Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What’s News?
● Focus is how journalists contributed to the symbolic construction of the disaster
○ It does analysis on content of major news reports on heat wave
○ Focuses on how news outlets transformed the disaster into a mediated public
event
● Social scientists usually only survey news coverage to assess how journalists represent
issues and events for their audiences, but rarely analyze the conditions in which
reporters and editors produce their accounts
○ This only shows that news outlets distorts coverage and omit key issues and info
rather than illustrating how journalists do this
○ This also results in social scientists unifying the media and individual news
companies into one monolithic actor instead of viewing them as a differentiated
set of institutions
● News outlets refract the perspectives and agendas of political officials thru a layerd set
of processes adn reporting techniques
○ Process on p.192
● Exogenous pressure and internal constraints that affected the disaster reporting
○ Newspaper accounts focused on sights, images, adn issues, that made for good
copy, and marginalized others
■ Emphasized: photos of piles of dead bodies, coping strategies of people
during heatwave, natural conditions, use of water to combat heat effects
■ De-emphasized: social conditions that affected impact of disaster
● Articles of how people died alone were put in the back of the
newspapers
● Why and how did the media outlets focus on certain issues and topics: did an analysis
on Chicago Tribune
Discovering Disaster
● They changed from (papajohn) making light of the heat wave and telling Chicagoans to
stop complaining to making the heat wave a serious thing and put articles about it on the
front page, once the mortality rate started going up and more bodies were found at the
morgue due to heat. Heat wave became top priority
● Journalists often mimic, consume, and critique other work from other colleagues
because it is a safe bet and they are often reinforced. But doing this creates a “vicious
info cycle” that affirms the importance of issues that interest of other journalists, but
excludes alternative ideas that could be noteworthy
○ This happens at tribune
● There is homogenized news production b/c the journalists have to compete with each
other
● People had to fight to get their issue the most coverage by vying to get their article on
the front page
○ News paper outlets treated the heat wave as a disaster and gave it coverage;
television did lifestyle and human interest stories because that would get more
views
● The city gov’t criticized the chief medical examiner and questioned whether the death toll
counts were legitimate, they could not believe in one day, so many could die. So the
news outlets, and television, were reluctant to make the heat wave a public event.
Whose News? Official Sources and Journalistic Routines
● This confusion of the validity of the death toll stemmed from news outlets not being able
to have expertise in all the areas they cover and thus having to depend on city
organizations for information
○ They must also treat the info from these organizations as facts and not critique
them b/c that could damage the news outlets relationship with the organization
○ The news outlets did not know where to turn to get infoo about the heat wave,
and had to depend on organizations to make a unified account of the diffused
disaster
● The debate over the deaths became a public event b/c the journalists themselves
were interested in the debate
○ They produced papers that made it seem like the scientific debate over the
validity of the heat death criteria by Donoghue was still going on, but really it was
just journalistic fabrication
■ , a journalists Made it seem like the CDC (specifically semenza) was still
skeptical of the super high death toll; but semenza reported he was not
○ They were also attuned to journalists practices of producing issues and topics
that are dramatic and will get alot of views b/c of competition
■ Their own opinions and debate were the ones promulgating the debate
and confusion over validity, not the scientific communities. And b/c of their
position in society, it had huge effects on the public
○ The journalists and public did not have widespread access to the info that the
scientific community resolved the debate over validity
○ The journalists articles on the confusion and debate were everywhere
○ The news outlets never published the findings of the medical examiner and mire
prominently published their own cynical debates because they were attuned to
journalistic practices of producing issues and topics that are dramatic and will get
alot of views
Fast Thinking
● Naturalizing the disaster
○ The reporters have very little time for their field work which
■ limits their ability to critically think about the info.
■ Causes them to resort to conventional frames b/c the amount of time they
have to make sense of the info is limited
● Conventional frame was that given by city officias was that the
heat wave was a natural disaster and not linnked to social
conditions
○ The reporters’ job during the heatwave is to storytell b/c they did not see the
heatwave as a scientific matter. The reporters often slip from storytelling to
expository/explanation without prefacing to readers that their conclusions are
provisional or incomplete
■ They said that the cause of heat wave was naturalistic, but failed to
include social connditons too.
○ They newsoutlets have deep solid reporting and field work, but thin speculative
explanations adn analysis that are rushed adn not based on any solid
reasoniinng
■ They claimed those who died were not lonely or did not die alone, but
they did not do the sufficient research and analyses to justify them
making these claims
○ Their rushed and hurried time line does not allow for them to do the analyses adn
research that allows them to make such general interpretations. But they make
these interpretations anyways b/c that’s what the audience expects of them and
that’s what gets views
Fragmentation of Audiences
It targeted its audiences by eliminating, editing, excerpting, or repositioning certain heat wave coverage
for their ethnoracially or regionally different readers and by changing the graphics and photographs so
that the paper’s visual images resonated with particular readers who wanted news about people like
them.