Market A Market B Market C

Rs. income Respondent 1 58 58 48

Rs. income Respondent 2 64 69 57
Rs. income Respondent 3 55 71 59
Rs. income Respondent 4 66 64 47
Rs. income Respondent 5 67 68 49

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Market A 5 310 62 27.5
Market B 5 330 66 26.5
Market C 5 260 52 31

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit F>F_critical
Between Groups 520 2 260 9.176471 0.003818 3.885294
Within Groups 340 12 28.33333

Total 860 14
F>F_critical
reject null hypothesis
Markets are different
Restaurant Population (1000s) Sales (Rs.1000s) 1. Correlation
1 2 58 Population (1000s)
2 6 105 Population (1000s) 1
3 8 88 Sales (Rs.1000s) 0.95012295520441
4 8 118
5 12 117 Population of the area is highly po
6 16 137 Higher the population, higher wou
7 20 157
8 20 169 2. Regression
9 22 149 Regression Statistics
10 26 202 Multiple R 0.95012295520441
R Square 0.90273363000636
Adjusted R Square 0.89057533375715
3. Sales revenue in areas of similar poplation are Standard Error 13.8293166859393
seen to differ probably because the per unit Observations 10
prices are different or the income levels of the
population is different
ANOVA
df
Regression 1
Residual 8
Total 9

Coefficients
Intercept 60
Population (1000s) 5
 Sales (Rs.1000s)

on of the area is highly positively correlated to sales

he population, higher would be the revenue ideally

Significant R spquare value, p value is also significant

y=60+5*x y->sales revenue, x->population

SS MS F Significance F
14200 14200 74.24837 2.549E-05
1530 191.25
15730

Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%
9.226034809703 6.503336 0.000187 38.72473 81.27527 38.72473 81.27527
0.580265238041 8.616749 2.549E-05 3.661906 6.338094 3.661906 6.338094
Customer Annual Income Payments Per
Age Marital Status Mortgage Amount ($)
Number ($) Year

1 37 SINGLE 1,72,125.70 4,73,402.96 24

2 31 SINGLE 1,08,571.04 3,00,468.60 12
3 37 MARRIED 1,24,136.41 3,30,664.24 24
4 24 MARRIED 79614.04 2,30,222.94 24
5 27 SINGLE 68087.33 2,82,203.53 12
6 30 MARRIED 59959.8 2,51,242.70 24
7 41 SINGLE 99394.05 2,82,737.29 12
8 29 SINGLE 38527.35 2,38,125.19 12
9 31 MARRIED 1,12,078.62 2,97,133.24 24
10 36 SINGLE 2,24,899.71 6,22,578.74 12
11 31 MARRIED 27945.36 2,15,440.31 24
12 40 SINGLE 48929.74 2,52,885.10 12
13 39 MARRIED 82810.92 1,83,045.16 12
14 31 SINGLE 68216.88 1,65,309.34 12
15 40 SINGLE 59141.13 2,20,176.18 12
16 45 MARRIED 72568.89 2,33,146.91 12
17 32 MARRIED 1,01,140.43 2,45,360.02 24
18 37 MARRIED 1,24,876.53 3,20,401.04 4
19 32 MARRIED 1,33,093.15 4,94,395.63 12
20 32 SINGLE 85268.67 1,59,010.33 12
21 37 SINGLE 92314.96 2,49,547.14 24
22 29 MARRIED 1,20,876.13 3,08,618.37 12
23 24 SINGLE 86294.13 2,58,321.78 24
24 32 MARRIED 2,16,748.68 6,34,609.61 24
25 44 SINGLE 46389.75 1,94,770.91 12
Total Amount Paid Default on Customer Binary(Martit Annual Income
Age
($) Mortgage? Number al Status) ($)

5,81,885.13 YES 1 37 0 1,712,125.00

4,89,320.38 NO 2 31 0 108,571.0
4,93,541.93 YES 3 37 1 124,136.0
4,49,682.09 YES 4 24 1 79,614.0400
5,20,581.82 NO 5 27 0 68,087.3300
3,56,711.58 YES 6 30 1 59,959.8000
5,24,053.46 NO 7 41 0 99,394.0500
4,68,595.99 NO 8 29 0 38,527.3500
3,99,617.40 YES 9 31 1 112,078.0000
12,33,002.14 NO 10 36 0 224,899.0000
2,85,900.10 YES 11 31 1 27,945.3600
3,36,574.63 NO 12 40 0 48,929.7400
2,62,537.23 NO 13 39 1 82,810.9200
2,53,633.17 NO 14 31 0 68,216.8800
4,24,749.80 NO 15 40 0 59,141.1300
3,56,363.93 NO 16 45 1 72,568.8900
3,88,429.41 YES 17 32 1 101,140.0000
3,60,783.45 YES 18 37 1 124,876.0000
8,61,874.67 NO 19 32 1 133,093.0000
3,08,656.11 NO 20 32 0 85,268.6700
3,42,339.27 YES 21 37 0 92,314.9600
4,72,668.98 NO 22 29 1 120,876.0000
3,80,347.56 YES 23 24 0 86,294.1300
9,15,640.13 YES 24 32 1 216,748.0000
3,85,288.86 NO 25 44 0 46,389.7500

CORRELATION
Age
Binary(Martital Status)
Annual Income ($)
Age 1
Binary(Mart-0.116 1
Annual Inc 0.107 -0.165337564 1
Mortgage -0.023 0.1101804133 0.407894447388
Payments P-0.358 0.2812267463 0.245740924746
Total Amou-0.041 -0.031235638 0.216130671134
 (Binary)D
Payments Per Total Amount Paid efault on
Mortgage Amount ($)
Year ($) Mortgage
? SUMMAR
Y OUTPUT
473,402 24.0 581,885.0 1
300,468 12.0 489,320.0 0 Regression Statistics
330,664 24.0 493,541.0 1 Multiple R
230,222 24.0 449,682.0 1 R Square
282,203 12.0 520,581.0 0 Adjusted R
251,242 24.0 356,711.0 1 Standard E
282,737 12.0 524,053.0 0 Observatio
238,125 12.0 468,595.0 0
297,133 24.0 399,617.0 1 ANOVA
622,578 12.0 1,233,002.0 0
215,440 24.0 285,900.0 1 Regression
252,885 12.0 336,574.0 0 Residual
183,045 12.0 262,537.0 0 Total
165,309 12.0 253,633.0 0
220,176 12.0 424,794.0 0 Coefficients
233,146 12.0 356,363.0 0 Intercept
245,360 24.0 388,429.0 1 Age
320,401 4.0 360,783.0 1 Binary(Mar
494,395 12.0 861,874.0 0 Annual In
159,010 12.0 308,656.0 0 Mortgage
249,547 24.0 342,339.0 1 Payments
308,618 12.0 472,668.0 0 Total Amou
258,321 24.0 380,347.0 1
634,609 24.0 915,640.0 1 INFERENCE
194,770 12.0 385,288.0 0
The model as a whole is significa
Also the Adijusted R-squared say
Among the variables, we see tha
Mortgage Amount ($)Payments Per Year
Total Amount Paid ($)

1
0.117771311620405 1
0.919590654668374 -0.024696171 1
 Apart from mortage, payments and total amt paid all variables are significant
Mortgage amount and total amount paid are highly correlated and hence one of them can be removed
Regression Statistics Annual Income,age,marital status doesn't play a prominent role as its coefficient value is less
0.886914 Total amount and mortage amount also have low coefficient values
0.786617
0.715489
0.27023
25

df SS MS F Significance F
6 4.84556 0.807593 11.05921 3.295E-05
18 1.31444 0.073024
24 6.16

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat
-0.267072 0.4767 -0.560251
-0.00739 0.010754 -0.687162
0.104006 0.13369 0.777969
-1.11E-07 2.377E-07 -0.465542
3.943E-06 1.575E-06 2.504478
0.048311 0.010321 4.680878
-2.2E-06 8.231E-07 -2.677434
P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%Upper 95.0%
0.582215 -1.268581 0.734438 -1.268581 0.734438
0.500739 -0.029984 0.015204 -0.029984 0.015204
0.446694 -0.176865 0.384878 -0.176865 0.384878
0.647127 -6.1E-07 3.888E-07 -6.1E-07 3.888E-07
0.022101 6.354E-07 7.252E-06 6.354E-07 7.252E-06
0.000186 0.026627 0.069994 0.026627 0.069994
0.01537 -3.93E-06 -4.75E-07 -3.93E-06 -4.75E-07

INFERENCE

The model as a whole is significant as we can see from F value

Also the Adijusted R-squared says that the model is able to explain around 70% of the error, which is good ( but may vary from company
Among the variables, we see that payments per year is the variable with importance as P value is very less
 one of them can be removed
fficient value is less

( but may vary from company to company)

 Year 2
Year 1 sale Year 3 sale
Model Weight Price sale
(units) (units)
(units)
Fierro 7B 17.9 2200 50 40 45
HX 5000 16.2 6350 30 35 35
Durbin Ultralight 15 8470 20 25 26
Schmidt 16 6300 15 15 10
WSilton Advanced 17.3 4100 45 25 35
bicyclette vélo 13.2 8700 20 26 30
Supremo Team 16.3 6100 30 30 40
XTC Racer 17.2 2680 48 35 36
D’Onofrio Pro 17.7 3500 20 25 26
Americana #6 14.2 8100 36 30 30
 Hotel Overall Comfort Amenities In-House Dining
Muri Beach Odyssey 94.3 94.5 90.8 97.7
Pattaya Resort 92.9 96.6 84.1 96.6
Sojourner’s Respite 92.8 99.9 100 88.4
Spa Carribe 91.2 88.5 94.7 97
Penang Resort and Spa 90.4 95 87.8 91.1
Mokihana Hōkele 90.2 92.4 82 98.7
Theo’s of Cape Town 90.1 95.9 86.2 91.9
Cap d’Agde Resort 89.8 92.5 92.5 88.8
Spirit of Mykonos 89.3 94.6 85.8 90.7
Turismo del Mar 89.1 90.5 83.2 90.4
Hotel Iguana 89.1 90.8 81.9 88.5
Sidi Abdel Rahman Palace 89 93 93 89.6
Sainte-Maxime Quarters 88.6 92.5 78.2 91.2
Rotorua Inn 87.1 93 91.6 73.5
Club Lapu-Lapu 87.1 90.9 74.9 89.6
Terracina Retreat 86.5 94.3 78 91.5
Hacienda Punta Barco 86.1 95.4 77.3 90.8
Rendezvous Kolocep 86 94.8 76.4 91.4
Cabo de Gata Vista 86 92 72.2 89.2
Sanya Deluxe 85.1 93.4 77.3 91.8
 Hotel Overall Comfort Amenities In-House Dining
Muri Beach Odyssey 94.3 94.5 90.8 97.7
Pattaya Resort 92.9 96.6 84.1 96.6
Sojourner’s Respite 92.8 99.9 100 88.4
Spa Carribe 91.2 88.5 94.7 97
Penang Resort and Spa 90.4 95 87.8 91.1
Mokihana Hōkele 90.2 92.4 82 98.7
Theo’s of Cape Town 90.1 95.9 86.2 91.9
Cap d’Agde Resort 89.8 92.5 92.5 88.8
Spirit of Mykonos 89.3 94.6 85.8 90.7
Turismo del Mar 89.1 90.5 83.2 90.4
Hotel Iguana 89.1 90.8 81.9 88.5
Sidi Abdel Rahman Palace 89 93 93 89.6
Sainte-Maxime Quarters 88.6 92.5 78.2 91.2
Rotorua Inn 87.1 93 91.6 73.5
Club Lapu-Lapu 87.1 90.9 74.9 89.6
Terracina Retreat 86.5 94.3 78 91.5
Hacienda Punta Barco 86.1 95.4 77.3 90.8
Rendezvous Kolocep 86 94.8 76.4 91.4
Cabo de Gata Vista 86 92 72.2 89.2
Sanya Deluxe 85.1 93.4 77.3 91.8

Normalized ratings
Hotel Overall Comfort Amenities In-House Dining
Muri Beach Odyssey 1.00 0.53 0.67 0.96
Pattaya Resort 0.85 0.71 0.43 0.92
Sojourner’s Respite 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.59
Spa Carribe 0.66 0.00 0.81 0.93
Penang Resort and Spa 0.58 0.57 0.56 0.70
Mokihana Hōkele 0.55 0.34 0.35 1.00
Theo’s of Cape Town 0.54 0.65 0.50 0.73
Cap d’Agde Resort 0.51 0.35 0.73 0.61
Spirit of Mykonos 0.46 0.54 0.49 0.68
Turismo del Mar 0.43 0.18 0.40 0.67
Hotel Iguana 0.43 0.20 0.35 0.60
Sidi Abdel Rahman Palace 0.42 0.39 0.75 0.64
Sainte-Maxime Quarters 0.38 0.35 0.22 0.70
Rotorua Inn 0.22 0.39 0.70 0.00
Club Lapu-Lapu 0.22 0.21 0.10 0.64
Terracina Retreat 0.15 0.51 0.21 0.71
Hacienda Punta Barco 0.11 0.61 0.18 0.69
Rendezvous Kolocep 0.10 0.55 0.15 0.71
Cabo de Gata Vista 0.10 0.31 0.00 0.62
Sanya Deluxe 0.00 0.43 0.18 0.73
 Regression
SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.865895539060659
R Square 0.749775084565149
Adjusted R Square 0.702857912921114
Standard Error 1.38787330162895
Observations 20

ANOVA
df
Regression 3
Residual 16
Total 19

Coefficients
Intercept 35.6967364821549
Comfort 0.109348527499748
Amenities 0.244268002183616
In-House Dining 0.247431197086944

Top 5 with regression Top 5 with Equal

Composite Score with Equal weightage
model weightage model
0.72 1.00 Muri Beach Odyssey Sojourner’s Respite
0.69 0.85 Pattaya Resort Muri Beach Odyssey
0.86 0.84 Sojourner’s Respite Pattaya Resort
0.58 0.66 Spa Carribe Theo’s of Cape Town
0.61 0.58 Penang Resort and Spa Penang Resort and Spa
0.56
0.63 As we can see if we go with the given ratings
0.56 model we get top 5 hotels who are not
completely same as if we consider hotels with
0.57 giving equal weightage to all the 3 factors. We
0.41 can see that Theo's of Cape town is 7th place
0.38 with overall rating but overall experience they
are giving is at 4th.
0.59
0.42
0.36
0.32
0.48
0.49
0.47
0.31
0.45
 Through Regression we can see that the major
factor contribution is by these 3 factors: Comfort,
Amenities and In House Dining. We can see that
Amenities and In house Dining are the factors that
the hotel chain should primarily be focused as they
contribute mostly to overall rating. So a customer
having better amenities and better in house dining
will give higher overall ratings.

SS MS F Significance F
92.34642 30.78214 15.98082 4.524E-05
30.81908 1.926192
123.1655

Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%
13.21538 2.70115 0.015735 7.681376 63.7121 7.681376 63.7121
0.129719 0.842966 0.411672 -0.165643 0.38434 -0.165643 0.38434
0.043315 5.63928 3.695E-05 0.152443 0.336093 0.152443 0.336093
0.062124 3.98288 0.00107 0.115735 0.379128 0.115735 0.379128

0.86
0.72
0.69
0.63
0.61