You are on page 1of 3

3472 JEEE TRANSACTIONSON MAGNETICS,VOL. 29, NO. 6.

NOVEMBER 1993

Pulse Annealing of FeSiB Amorphous Wires


S. Atalay, P.T. Squire and M.R.J.Gibbs
School of Physics, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK

Abstmct The magnetic field dependence of to the anisotropy energy density EK), 8 is the easy axis
magnetization and Young's modulus of pubannealed orientation to the axis of the applied field H and stress 0. F
Fe,,,Si,,B,, are reported. Coercivity and anisotropy is a function whose value varies between zero and 912. The
energy density were measured as a function of annealing general features of the model are independent of sample
current and the tensile stress applied during annealing. It geometry and the detailed domain structure; therefore the
is shown that pulse annealing can remove the internal model can be used b interpret results for amorphous wires..
stresses more effectively than furnace annealing. The nonnalised modulus ratio E/Es is shown in Fig. 1for
Coercivity and anisotropy energy density fall by a few
selected values of 0. Of particular significance are the
percent for annealing currents up to 1 A. Currents
between 1 A and 1.5 A reduce both quantities by nearly values of the ratio at H=O and the minimum, E-/Es. These
an order of magnitude. Higher annealing currents result are determined mainly by 8 and the dimensionless ratio
in sharp increases in the parameters , as crystallization
begins. p = A.: EslK . (2)

I. INTRODUCTION Equations (1) and (2), together with measurements of


coercivity and anisotropy energy, provide the basis for
It is well known that annealing of amorphous alloys can discussing the effects of annealing.
remove the intemal stresses which are induced during the
solidification process. In previous work we have reported the
reduction of the intemal stresses in Fe,7,Si,,B,, wires by DETAILS
11. EXPERIMENTAL
current [l] and furnace [2] annealing. Interpretation of
elastic moduli data showed that neither treatment completely Fe,,,Si,,B,, wires with a diameter of 1 2 5 p were supplied
removed the intemal stresses before the onset of by the Unitika Corporation. Flash annealing was performed
crystallization. as follows: An amorphous wire 10.6 cm long was clamped at
In contrast to fumace and steady current annealing, it has each end. A direct current pulse was passed through the
been shown that pulsed current annealing, achieved by sample. The current was calculated from the voltage pulse
passing a direct current through the sample for a short time, measured across a noninductive, zero-temperature-
can almost completely remove the intemal stresses in coefficient resistor in series with the sample. Annealing was
Co-based amorphous ribbons [3] One of the advantages of done at currents ranging from 0 to about 1.5 A, and with
such a treatment is that it can achieve very high heating and various tensile stresses applied. The pulse width was kept
cooling rates. This allows the amorphous phase to be constant at 100 ms. Further details are given in [5]. No
retained at temperatures unavailable in conventional reliable method was available for determining the
treatments. In this paper we report a study of the reduction temperature, so the pulse current has been used to specify the
of the intemal stresses in Fe-based amorphous wires by annealing conditions.
pulsed current annealing. The effect of a tensile stress
applied during the annealing is also studied because this can
significantly modify the induced anisotropy. 1

We have shown [1,2] that measurements of Young's a8 -


modulus as a function of applied field can be used to test
various features of the domain structure in amorphous wires, as -
that are not accessible to direct study. It is shown in [4] that 1

for field annealed amorphous ribbons 0.4 i \ I


--
E - 1
(1)
Es I+{hiEsF(O,H,o)lK) '

where E, is the saturation modulus, & is the saturation


magnetostriction, K is the anisotropy constant (proportional Fig. 1. Modulus ratios predicted by (l),(2) for various easy axis angles 9.
The value of fl is typicalof a well annealed Febased amorphous material.
Manusaipt received February 15,1993.
0018-9464/93$03.00Q 1993IEEE
3473

1.5
1

0 a=367 MPa

I
-1.0
.......*

0.0 0.5 1.o 1.5 2.0


I (A)
Fig. 2. M(H) loops of wires pulseannealed under 367 Mpa tensile stress
Fig. 3. Coercivity as a function of annealing current at zero and 367 MPa
tensile stress.
The magnetic field dependence of Young's modulus, E(H),
was measured by the vibrating reed method. The third mode towards unity. The minimum ratio E-ES =0.4 ,
was excited, and the samples had a free length of 2.5 cm, corresponding to the greatest modulus change, was obtained
resulting in resonant frequencies in the range 1.5-2.5 kHz. for the wire annealed at 1.51 A. Although very low
The M(H) loops were obtained using a dc digital system. The anisotropy energies were obtained by this method of
coercivity H,was measured directly from the M(H) loops, annealing, the modulus changes were found to be less than
and the anisotropy energy density was estimated from the those in furnace-annealed wires [l]. This suggests that the
area between the loops and the M axis. easy axis distribution following pulsed current annealing is
less favourable for a large AE effect Comparison of Figs. 1
and 5 indicates that for the optimum annealing current of
111. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1.51 A the easy axes are at close to 45' to the wire axis,
whereas for optimum AE effect they should be near 90°.
Fig. 2 shows the dc hysteresis loops of the pulse annealed The application of tensile stress during annealing has a
wires at currents between 0.5 A and 1.36 A. For this range pronounced effect on the modulus ratios (Fig. 6). Under
the Large Barkhausen Jump (LB J) characteristic of as-cast these conditions plastic flow could be induced. For currents
wires [6] is observed, the increase in the remanence ratio below 1.36 A the permanent axial strain was no more than
MJM, to almost one indicating the increase in core volume 1.5%. For higher currents this increased to as much as lo%,
as the stress in the outer shell is reduced. (At annealing with a corresponding decrease in diameter of 5%. This
currents greater than 1.36 A the LBJ disappeared, consistent deformation induces a mechanical anisotropy in the easy
with further reduction of intemal stress.) axis direction, which tends to align the magnetic moments
Figs. 3 and 4 show that H, and % remain almost constant along the wire axis. There is thus the possibility of an
until the annealing current reaches 1 A. Between 1.OA and interplay between opposing mechanisms for determining
1.5 A both parameters drop sharply. Above 1.5 A both H, the easy axis directions. The sensitivity of the resulting
and E, increase sharply, indicating that crystallization has behaviour to annealing conditions is evident in Fig. 6. For
occurred. The application of tensile stress during annealing an annealing current of 0.67 A the field dependence of EE,
affects H, more than E,. This is not altogether surprising , is very like that of the low-current, zero-stress annealed
since it has been found that in amorphous ribbons H, is a samples (Fig. 5). At 1.31A E,,,&, for the stress-annealed
very sensitive indicator of intemal stress. For 0=367 MPa
the minimum Q was observed in the wire annealed at a
current of 1.36 A ; the value of 0.2 Alm is the lowest that
has been reported for Fe-based amorphous wires.
Fig. 5 shows the magnetic field dependence of Young's
modulus, normalised to the value E, at saturation, for wire
annealed without tension. As explained in the Introduction,
the ratio E-Es is determined mainly by 8 and K. For wires
annealed below 1.15 A this ratio is almost equal to that for
as-cast wire. This can be understood by the constancy of E,
(Fig. 4) and therefore of K below this current. It also
" , i i 2
500

indicates that the easy axis distribution is not significantly 05 1.0 1.5
changed. Above 1.15 A K starts to decrease, so the ratio I (A)
E,@, increases; finally K increases again, as
crystallization sets in, leading to a rapid increase in E&E, Fig. 4. Anisotropy energy density as a function of annealing current at
zero and 367 MPa tensile stress
3414

0.8

LLY
\ 0.6 0 1=0.67 A
W W

0.4 y 0 1=1.54 A
A 1=1.31 A
0 1=1.36 A
0 1=1.54 A

0.2 f I I I I I 0.2
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0 0.5 1.o 1.5 2.0 2.5
H (kA/m) H (kA/m)

Fig. 5. Normalised Young's modulus as a function of applied field for Wires Fig. 6. Normalised Young's modulus as a function of applied field for
annealed at zero stress. wires annealedunder 367 MPa of tensile stress.

samples is close to its minimum value, and occurs at lower amorphous wires. It can remove most of the casting stress,
H. This shows that the easy axis direction has been pulled to and can reduce the anisotropy energy by an order of
near 45' . At the slightly higher current of 1.36 A there is magnitude. The simultaneous application of tensile stress
hardly any AE effect at all, in spite of the low anisotropy. during annealing enables the coercivity to be decreased even
This can only be explained by assuming that the easy axis is more, resulting in a value as low as 0.2 Nm. Its effect on the
very close to the wire axis ( 8 4 9 , consistent with anisotropy elastic modulus is complicated by the competing effects of
dominated by the mechanical component. At the higher mechanically induced anisotropy and crystallization.
current of 1.54 A E-ES falls again, showing that 8 is
between 45' and 90° . This can be attributed to the now
stronger, competing effect of crystallization.
Such pronounced changes of anisotropy direction under the ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
combined influences of stress and current during the The authors thank Del Atkinson for helpful discussions, and
annealing process show how delicate may be the balance Mike Harriman for technical help.
between the various competing sources of anisotropy. The
elastic modulus ratio is a sensitive indicator of these REFERE"
changes; taken in conjunction with M(H) curves it can be
used to deduce important information about the anisotropy
magnitude and direction. [l] S. Atalay and P.T. Squire, "Comparative measurements of the field
dependence of Young's modulus and shear modulus in Fe-based amorphous
One of the main motives for this study was to inhibit wires," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 70, pp 6516-6518, November 1991.
crystallization by using a short, high temperature anneal. (21 D. Atkinson, M.R.J. Gibbs, P.T. Squire, S. Atalay and D.G. Lord, "The
The evidence from X-ray data supports the assertion, based effect of annealing and crystallion on the magnetoelastic properties of
here on the magnetic and magnetoelastic behaviour, that FeSi-B amaphous wire," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 73, pp 3411-3417, April 1993.
[3] A. Mitra, M. Vazquez, A. Hernando and C. GomezcPolo, "Flash annealing
significant crystallization does not occur below an annealing of Cwich amorphous alloy," IEEE Truns. Mugn., vol. 26, pp 1415-1417,
current of 1.51 A . Comparison with the effect of fumace September 1990.
annealing [2] c o n f i i s the success of the pulse annealing [4] P.T. Squire, "Phenomenological model for magnetisation, magnetastriction
method. and AE effect in field-annealed amorphous ribbons," J. Mu@. Mu@. Muter. ,
vol. 87, pp 299-310, 1990.
The results reported here are selected from a much more [5] S. Atalay, "Magnetoelastic properties of iron-based amorphous wires,"
extensive data set. In particular, the annealing current pulse Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bath, 1992.
length and annealing stress were varied. The values chosen [6] J.Yamasaki, F.B. Humphrey, K. M d u i , H. Kawamura, T. Takamure and
for this report represent the best results that were obtained. R MalmhBU, "Large Barkhausen discontinuities in &based amorphous wires
with negative magnetacitriction," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 63, pp 3949-3951, April
However, the trends reported could be reproduced under 1988.
different conditions, so we believe the main effects to be
reproducible.

IV.CONCLUSIONS
Pulsed current annealing is a convenient method of
improving the magnetic and magnetoelastic properties of

You might also like