Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NOVEMBER 1993
Abstmct The magnetic field dependence of to the anisotropy energy density EK), 8 is the easy axis
magnetization and Young's modulus of pubannealed orientation to the axis of the applied field H and stress 0. F
Fe,,,Si,,B,, are reported. Coercivity and anisotropy is a function whose value varies between zero and 912. The
energy density were measured as a function of annealing general features of the model are independent of sample
current and the tensile stress applied during annealing. It geometry and the detailed domain structure; therefore the
is shown that pulse annealing can remove the internal model can be used b interpret results for amorphous wires..
stresses more effectively than furnace annealing. The nonnalised modulus ratio E/Es is shown in Fig. 1for
Coercivity and anisotropy energy density fall by a few
selected values of 0. Of particular significance are the
percent for annealing currents up to 1 A. Currents
between 1 A and 1.5 A reduce both quantities by nearly values of the ratio at H=O and the minimum, E-/Es. These
an order of magnitude. Higher annealing currents result are determined mainly by 8 and the dimensionless ratio
in sharp increases in the parameters , as crystallization
begins. p = A.: EslK . (2)
1.5
1
0 a=367 MPa
I
-1.0
.......*
indicates that the easy axis distribution is not significantly 05 1.0 1.5
changed. Above 1.15 A K starts to decrease, so the ratio I (A)
E,@, increases; finally K increases again, as
crystallization sets in, leading to a rapid increase in E&E, Fig. 4. Anisotropy energy density as a function of annealing current at
zero and 367 MPa tensile stress
3414
0.8
LLY
\ 0.6 0 1=0.67 A
W W
0.4 y 0 1=1.54 A
A 1=1.31 A
0 1=1.36 A
0 1=1.54 A
0.2 f I I I I I 0.2
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0 0.5 1.o 1.5 2.0 2.5
H (kA/m) H (kA/m)
Fig. 5. Normalised Young's modulus as a function of applied field for Wires Fig. 6. Normalised Young's modulus as a function of applied field for
annealed at zero stress. wires annealedunder 367 MPa of tensile stress.
samples is close to its minimum value, and occurs at lower amorphous wires. It can remove most of the casting stress,
H. This shows that the easy axis direction has been pulled to and can reduce the anisotropy energy by an order of
near 45' . At the slightly higher current of 1.36 A there is magnitude. The simultaneous application of tensile stress
hardly any AE effect at all, in spite of the low anisotropy. during annealing enables the coercivity to be decreased even
This can only be explained by assuming that the easy axis is more, resulting in a value as low as 0.2 Nm. Its effect on the
very close to the wire axis ( 8 4 9 , consistent with anisotropy elastic modulus is complicated by the competing effects of
dominated by the mechanical component. At the higher mechanically induced anisotropy and crystallization.
current of 1.54 A E-ES falls again, showing that 8 is
between 45' and 90° . This can be attributed to the now
stronger, competing effect of crystallization.
Such pronounced changes of anisotropy direction under the ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
combined influences of stress and current during the The authors thank Del Atkinson for helpful discussions, and
annealing process show how delicate may be the balance Mike Harriman for technical help.
between the various competing sources of anisotropy. The
elastic modulus ratio is a sensitive indicator of these REFERE"
changes; taken in conjunction with M(H) curves it can be
used to deduce important information about the anisotropy
magnitude and direction. [l] S. Atalay and P.T. Squire, "Comparative measurements of the field
dependence of Young's modulus and shear modulus in Fe-based amorphous
One of the main motives for this study was to inhibit wires," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 70, pp 6516-6518, November 1991.
crystallization by using a short, high temperature anneal. (21 D. Atkinson, M.R.J. Gibbs, P.T. Squire, S. Atalay and D.G. Lord, "The
The evidence from X-ray data supports the assertion, based effect of annealing and crystallion on the magnetoelastic properties of
here on the magnetic and magnetoelastic behaviour, that FeSi-B amaphous wire," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 73, pp 3411-3417, April 1993.
[3] A. Mitra, M. Vazquez, A. Hernando and C. GomezcPolo, "Flash annealing
significant crystallization does not occur below an annealing of Cwich amorphous alloy," IEEE Truns. Mugn., vol. 26, pp 1415-1417,
current of 1.51 A . Comparison with the effect of fumace September 1990.
annealing [2] c o n f i i s the success of the pulse annealing [4] P.T. Squire, "Phenomenological model for magnetisation, magnetastriction
method. and AE effect in field-annealed amorphous ribbons," J. Mu@. Mu@. Muter. ,
vol. 87, pp 299-310, 1990.
The results reported here are selected from a much more [5] S. Atalay, "Magnetoelastic properties of iron-based amorphous wires,"
extensive data set. In particular, the annealing current pulse Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bath, 1992.
length and annealing stress were varied. The values chosen [6] J.Yamasaki, F.B. Humphrey, K. M d u i , H. Kawamura, T. Takamure and
for this report represent the best results that were obtained. R MalmhBU, "Large Barkhausen discontinuities in &based amorphous wires
with negative magnetacitriction," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 63, pp 3949-3951, April
However, the trends reported could be reproduced under 1988.
different conditions, so we believe the main effects to be
reproducible.
IV.CONCLUSIONS
Pulsed current annealing is a convenient method of
improving the magnetic and magnetoelastic properties of