Points 87: Clinical Practice Evaluation 1

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1
Richard Henriquez 20728308

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Master of Education in Secondary Education

PROGRAM: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SEC-590 1/21/2021 5/5/2021

COURSE: _____________________________________________________ START DATE: ____________________________ END DATE: _____________________
Monte Vista High School

COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________
California
SCHOOL STATE: ___________________________________
Linda Fellers
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Jeffrey Miles
GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

EVALUATION 1 TOTAL
POINTS 87 points 87 %
10.00 1000 870 100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(The GCU Faculty (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Supervisor should create a this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
plan with the Teacher Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
performance of the Teacher Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this disposition and consistently exceeds this
disposition or expectations disposition and expectations this disposition and disposition and expectations for expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.
High Expectations Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should believe that all students could learn and should set and support realistic expectations for student success. 1.00
These expectations should be communicated in positive ways. 82
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Mr. Henriquez strives to differentiate instruction based on students’ needs, turning mistakes into learning opportunities both for individual students, and the whole class. He creates positive
interactions, and uses several learning strategies to support student’s learning. Richard should continue to work towards engaging all students through the use of a randomization tool or
technique.
Respect for the Diversity of Others Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should be sensitive to individual learning and the social needs of students and embrace the cultural diversity of
the community. They should develop and maintain educational communities marked by respect for others. They should interact
with their students, fellow educators, administrators, parents, and other community members with courtesy and civility and 90 1.00
establish relationships characterized by respect and rapport.
Evidence
Mr. Henriquez demonstrates respect for the diversity of others in many ways including learning to pronounce all students’ names correctly, incorporating diverse cultures through classroom
assignments and projects, and including multicultural literature in the classroom lessons.


future evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Fairness Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality, and exercise
fairness in all areas including assessment. 95 1.00
Evidence
Richard creates a safe learning environment that promotes respect and positivity. He models listening and respecting others opinions, ideas, and concerns.
Professional Conduct Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should exercise sound judgment and ethical behavior. They should be a positive role model within their
community. 90
Evidence 1.00
Mr. Henriquez strives to communicate with parents/guardians in a timely and respectful manner that represents the
best interests of the students. He maintains a kind and positive demeanor and presents himself as a positive role model within his community.


future evaluations)
Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this disposition and consistently exceeds this 1.00
teaching. teaching.
Reflection Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a professional. Educators should
be thoughtful about their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek continual improvement. 83
Evidence
((The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
Richard analyzes strengths and weaknesses of lesson planning and delivery regularly, making necessary adjustments. He should continue working to modify instruction based on students’
understanding, and seek out professional feedback and learning opportunities
Curiosity Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry.
79
Evidence
Richard gives ample wait time for all learners to comprehend questions and answers. He should continue to work towards asking open-ended and higher-order thinking questions throughout
instruction, and varying his teaching style. Work to include real-world examples and encourage personal connections in lessons


future evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Honesty Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions.
95 1.00
Evidence
Richard demonstrates honesty in all teaching responsibilities. He models high morals in regard to trustworthiness, fairness, and truthfulness, and follows through with commitments to others.
Compassion Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their relationships with others
while providing intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support. 85
Evidence
Mr. Henriquez demonstrates compassion when he calls students by name, actively listens to students and answering questions patiently. He offers praise, communicates clearly and kindly to all
students, and creates a positive rapport by smiling and being actively engaged in conversations.


future evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Advocacy Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the welfare of others in
the educational setting. 83 1.00
Evidence
Richard values others through being an active listener. Work to build community by getting to know students on a personal level and provide opportunities for
students to interact and build relationships with each other as well. Provide clear expectations, then encourage and model the expectations given.
Dedication Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning.
88
1.00
Evidence
Mr. Henriquez positively interacts with staff, students, families and other stakeholders. He understands and adheres to teacher responsibilities, putting students’ wants, needs and interests first.
Continue working to differentiate instruction and provide engaging lessons.

INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.
Total Scored Percentage:

87 %
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1:
(Optional)
Attachment 2:
(Optional)
AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating / Mentor Teacher. The GCU Faculty
Supervisor and Cooperating /Mentor Teacher should collaboratively review the performance in each category prior to the evaluation meeting.
I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.
GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date

Jeffrey Miles
Jeffrey Miles (Feb 19, 2021 13:24 PST) Feb 19, 2021

Points 87: Clinical Practice Evaluation 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Points 87: Clinical Practice Evaluation 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Richard Henriquez 20728308

Master of Education in Secondary Education

SEC-590 1/21/2021 5/5/2021

Monte Vista High School

FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

Richard Henriquez 20728308

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

High Expectations Score No Evidence

Respect for the Diversity of Others Score No Evidence

Richard Henriquez 20728308

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Fairness Score No Evidence

Professional Conduct Score No Evidence

Richard Henriquez 20728308

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Reflection Score No Evidence

Curiosity Score No Evidence 1.00

Richard Henriquez 20728308

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Honesty Score No Evidence

Compassion Score No Evidence 1.00

Richard Henriquez 20728308

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Advocacy Score No Evidence

Dedication Score No Evidence

Richard Henriquez 20728308

Total Scored Percentage:

AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date

You might also like