Evaluation 1

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1
Stevie Higbee 20405487

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Bachelor of Science in Mathematics for Secondary Education

PROGRAM: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SEC-490 8/17/2020 11/29/2020

COURSE: _____________________________________________________ START DATE: ____________________________ END DATE: _____________________
Pahranagat Valley High School

COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Nevada
SCHOOL STATE: ___________________________________
Mike Sparrow
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Ted Weisman
GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

EVALUATION 1 TOTAL
POINTS 85.5 points 85.5 %
10.00 1000 855 100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
100
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(The GCU Faculty (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Supervisor should create a this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
plan with the Teacher Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this disposition in
future evaluations)
No Evidence 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
performance of the Teacher Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this disposition and consistently exceeds this
disposition or expectations disposition and expectations this disposition and disposition and expectations for expectations for a Teacher disposition and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.
High Expectations Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should believe that all students could learn and should set and support realistic expectations for student success. 1.00
These expectations should be communicated in positive ways. 85
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
SH welcomed students into the classroom. She was positive and engaged with her student interactions. She asked multiple questions of students, both as a group and individually. For the
lesson observe SH modeled the skills using Google Sheets and students used the platform to build on previous math knowledge and tasks. She provided direct feedback where necessary, in
addition to her whole group instruction. All students had their own chromebook and were able to access the content/program. SH integrated previous knowledge with future tasks by having
students complete equations and select a portfolio problem for an upcoming lesson.
Respect for the Diversity of Others Score No Evidence
Teacher candidates should be sensitive to individual learning and the social needs of students and embrace the cultural diversity of
the community. They should develop and maintain educational communities marked by respect for others. They should interact
with their students, fellow educators, administrators, parents, and other community members with courtesy and civility and 80 1.00
establish relationships characterized by respect and rapport.
Evidence
SH addressed both individual and whole group needs. She was positive in all of her interactions and listened when students expressed concerns or issues. Specifically, when a student expressed
that she was lost, SH provided direct instruction and feedback to support the student.


future evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Fairness Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should promote social justice and equity, maintain appropriate standards of confidentiality, and exercise
fairness in all areas including assessment. 85 1.00
Evidence
SH consistently demonstrated positivity and awareness in all of here interactions with students and her co-teacher. When presented with challenges or questions, SH maintained a high level of
professionalism as well as an upbeat demeanor. She treated all students fairly and made a clear effort to address an concerns or questions that arose in the class.
Professional Conduct Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should exercise sound judgment and ethical behavior. They should be a positive role model within their
community. 80
Evidence 1.00
SH maintained a positive and kind demeanor at all times.


future evaluations)
Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this disposition and consistently exceeds this 1.00
teaching. teaching.
Reflection Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should recognize that reflection combined with experience leads to growth as a professional. Educators should
be thoughtful about their professional practice, critically examine it, and seek continual improvement. 85
Evidence
((The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this disposition. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions for
SH explicitly acknowledged areas that she has learned and grown in terms of comfort with technology. She made adjustments to her lesson to address questions raised by students and created
an environment where students felt comfortable to express uncertainty. During the lesson, she sought feedback from her co-teacher and immediately utilized that information to support her
instruction.
Curiosity Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should promote and support curiosity and encourage active inquiry.
80
Evidence
SH promoted inquiry by not only asking multiple questions of varying levels of difficulty, she explicitly encouraged students to explore the program and prepare questions for future classes. In
addition, she identified her own learning and discussed the value of the content moving forward.


future evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Honesty Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should model integrity by their words and actions.
90 1.00
Evidence
SH is a consummate professional in all of her interactions and communications. She treats all of her students fairly and endeavors to meet at their level while maintaining high expectations of all.
Compassion Score No Evidence 1.00

Teacher candidates should demonstrate professional friendliness, warmth, and genuine caring in their relationships with others
while providing intellectual, emotional, and spiritual support. 95
Evidence
SH endeavors to create a positive and open learning environment, where students can express themselves and ask question. She provided direct feedback when necessary, as well as whole class
guidance. SH actively listens to her students, offers praise, and communicates clearly.


future evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Advocacy Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates understand the impact of community involvement and servant leadership as it applies to the welfare of others in
the educational setting. 85 1.00
Evidence
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, engaging in volunteer opportunities, extra-curricular activities, and working with the community looks very different. SH understands the relationships between
school and the community and does what she can in her limited capacity to exhibit servant leadership and impact the community in a positive way.
Dedication Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates should be committed to the profession of teaching and learning.
90
1.00
Evidence
SH works regularly with her co-teacher to create and deliver content for their students. She is highly engaged in lesson-planning and learning best practices for her own instruction. She asks
questions and seeks to increase her foundational and pedagogical knowledge.

INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.
Total Scored Percentage:

85.5 %
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1:
(Optional)
Attachment 2:
(Optional)
AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating / Mentor Teacher. The GCU Faculty
Supervisor and Cooperating /Mentor Teacher should collaboratively review the performance in each category prior to the evaluation meeting.
I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.
GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date
Ted J Weisman (Sep 11, 2020 07:49 PDT) Sep 11, 2020

Evaluation 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Evaluation 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 1

Stevie Higbee 20405487

Bachelor of Science in Mathematics for Secondary Education

SEC-490 8/17/2020 11/29/2020

Pahranagat Valley High School

FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

Stevie Higbee 20405487

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

High Expectations Score No Evidence

Stevie Higbee 20405487

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Fairness Score No Evidence

Professional Conduct Score No Evidence

Stevie Higbee 20405487

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Reflection Score No Evidence

Curiosity Score No Evidence 1.00

Stevie Higbee 20405487

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Honesty Score No Evidence

Compassion Score No Evidence 1.00

Stevie Higbee 20405487

GCU Professional Dispositions of Learners Scoring Guide

Advocacy Score No Evidence

Dedication Score No Evidence

Stevie Higbee 20405487

Total Scored Percentage:

AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date

You might also like