Intrapersonal communication

Intrapersonal communication is a communicator's internal use of languages or thoughts. It can be

useful to envision intrapersonal communication occurring in the individual's mind, which
contains a sender, receiver, and feedback loop. It can be based on emotions, feelings, thinking,
and planning. Humans communicate with themselves most time while thinking. In Intrapersonal
communication, a person himself is a sender and receiver. While thinking in a conflict scenario,
the person resolved the conflict himself after thinking is the type of intrapersonal
communication. The basis of interpersonal communication is self-concept or self-awareness.
Interpersonal communication involves three factors; belief, value, and attitude. These three
factors combine to develop behavior. Behavior forms our physical actions and opinions.
Interpersonal communication also develops our perception of the outer environment. It also
developed expectations about ourselves. Intrapersonal communication comprises three types in
which internal discourse, solo-vocal communication, and sole-written communication. When we
pray or meditate, the main thoughts are in our minds, and then there is the stability of the
thoughts we will select the best of them: internal discourse. A lot of the time, it happens when we
talk to ourselves. When we are rehearsing in our mind or loudly to communicate with others, it is
solo vocal communication. Generally, solo written communication is not intended to
communicate with others. When we write personal blogs or diaries, we are communicating as
solo written communication.

Pragmatic language
Sometimes we do not precisely say what we mean, yet we still manage to understand each other.
If we ask is it raining? When I come inside soaking wet and "I say great job jack," the person
probably assumes that I am being sarcastic rather than complimenting him. We can figure out
what is going on because we do not just look at words and sentences for meaning. We also look
at the context. We do not have 100% complete information about everything that is going on
when we are talking to peoples, so we often need to make some assumptions about the context to
understand each other. There are four main assumptions that pragmaticist talks about when it
comes to communication. The first is quality, quantity, relevance, and manner. In some context,
a sentence could be a statement of admiration at your friend's detective power, but in other
contacts like if your friend has done something unwise, calling him wise illustrates how much
they are not wise. That is because most of the time, we assume that people are trying to
communicate high-quality information. We know that people can live, but we usually assumed
that they are telling the truth, so when the context and the words do not match, we can deduce
more truth like sarcasm. English is a universal language, and with the globalization of the world's
economy, it is becoming even more critical to speak English. When it comes to pragmatic failure
in intercultural communication, learning English from a grammar book is not enough. Many
peoples often have a clear understanding of the word, but they cannot understand the statement's
real meaning. This is where intercultural communication can break down. There are rules that
native speakers understand, but we will not learn them from grammar books or dictionaries.
Peoples from two different cultures may teach the same language but do not always understand
each other or offend each other. People get confused or rendered the best way to avoid this
misunderstanding is to watch and listen to the native speaker whenever we can.

Conflict Resolving
Conflict is psychology cal state of mind when people are in the state of dilemma whether to do or
not to do a thing, is a state of conflict. Two peoples cannot be accepted to agree on everything at
all the time, so conflict arises. Like the conflict, it is natural, and they are not to be such a
significant matter. Conflicts are multidimensional and universal. I saw a situation at my work
when two workers are bargaining for the work and usability of the machines simultaneously, but
one worker refused to work with another. This causes conflict in the scenario. Conflict workers
take it personally and get mad. In this conflict situation controlling the defensive response is
most important. The other worker told him that if the conflict is taking long, they do not get the
order on time, the customer would not have them, so it is needed to do the business entirely. He
Appeals to their mutual self-interest that they both need the company to succeed to keep their
jobs.

On the other hand, control of your emotions is also essentially needed to resolve the conflicts. It
is not about being good self-righteousness because it is not healthy, so we let it go and move
forward rather than dwell on the insult. Sometimes putting yourself in other shows may be the
best conflict resolution in the workplace. For example, if the worker understands the other
worker's responsibilities, it is an excellent technique to put himself in the other person's shoes.
Active listening is the keep important in conflict resolution. We must keep ourselves an open-
ended question that requires more than yes or no answer, and then we listen and do not interrupt
on do not judge the other person to feel like they have been heard.