Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved 2
Outline of Chapter 1
Aim of Chapter 1: Control Function of Management
3 4
1) Management and its components ① Objective setting
①. Objective Setting Objectives are a necessary for a company
• Without objectives, it is impossible …
– to assess whether the employees’ actions
meet the requirements;
②. Strategy Formulation – to make claims about an organization’s
success.
• Objectives can be:
– financial vs. non-financial
③. Management Control – quantified, explicit vs. implicit
– economic, social, environmental, or societal
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved 8
2) Employee control issues a. Employee Lack of Direction
• Three issues Employees do not know what the company
/ manager expected from them
i. Do employees understand what the manager
expect of them?
a. Lack of direction Less likely to
ii. Will employees work consistently hard and try complete the tasks
to do what is expected of them?
b. Lack of motivation Solution:
iii. Are employees capable of doing what is COMMUNICATION + REINFORCEMENT
expected of them?
c. Personal limitations
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
3) Management Control System Control alternatives
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Selection of Control method Depending on
Example: Movie Production
(i) Job nature, (ii) ability of people
Excellent
Action Control
Performance Measure: and/or Action Control
➢Movie completed within time limit Results Control (e.g., large projects)
RESULT and budgets
➢No. of tickets sold (sales revenue)
CONTROL
➢Comments from experts and
public
Results Control People Control
➢Awards
(e.g., movie director, (e.g., research lab)
entity manager)
Poor
ACTION Impossible to conduct action
CONTROL control during movie production High Low
17 Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
• Prevention / detection – Have the ability to make sure that the desirable
actions carried out by employee
– Preventing undesirable behaviors by ▪ Giving instructions (verbal, documents) to employee
employee
▪ Clear organizational structure: Flows of work process,
– Preventing not performed by employee procedure, division of duties, workplace layout
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Internal Control
Assessment on
Behavioral constraints on Employee
Actions taken by employee
• Physical constraints: Writing up action plans, investment proposals, or
– Locks, passwords, limited access to certain areas budgets
(warehouse, computer room & systems, office of i. Set objective and guidelines for the task
accounting and senior executives), camera etc. ii. Review proposal / budgets and approved by
• Administrative regulations / restriction managers
– Restriction of decision-making authority iii. Regularly check during the process
– Separation of duties, etc. Assigning more resources to a task than necessary
– Limited access to confidential information Are “backup” people or facilities necessary?
– Limited access to certain internal information Backup increase costs and result in waste
systems / meetings / projects etc. materials, unused facilities, workers idle etc.
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
B. Personnel / cultural controls Self Control
① People are self-controlled when they
①Employee will control their own behaviors – have a conscience that leads them to do what is right
▪ Personnel control – find self-satisfaction when they do a good job and see
▪ Self-monitoring their organization succeed
• Labels …
②Employee will control each other – Self-control (shaped by culture, religion, belief, value)
▪ Cultural controls – Intrinsic motivation 內心滿足感
▪ Mutual monitoring – Ethics and morality 外在 規則
– Trust and atmosphere 環境因素
③ Employee will be controlled by – Loyalty
▪ Human supervisors or control device (camera, – Habit, practice
tracking / speed control)
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Management Control
ACCT440 Spring 2021
Starts with people controls
• People controls …
– Must always be relied on to a certain extent
Chapter 4
– Have relatively few harmful side-effects
– Involve relatively low out-of-pocket costs
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Degree of Control Tightness A) Tight action controls (1 of 2)
• Internal Control on behaviour
Good control is said when there is …. – Physical constraints higher control costs
➢ a high probability that the task will be – Administrative constraints
▪ Restricting decision-making to higher organizational levels
completed by employee in time provides tighter controls if:
➢ a low probability that failure or unpleasant – Senior people makes more reliable decisions
– Avoiding subordinates violate the regulations by separation
events will occur of duties or limit access to particular area and computer
systems.
2 Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Tight results control (2 of 2) C) Tight people controls
– Measure of performance / result • The tightness of personnel controls depends
▪ Precision (minimize number of items to be measured ) on matching between people and organization
▪ Objectivity (freedom of “personal bias”, based on figures) – Selection and training
▪ Timeliness (“lag” between occurrence and measurement)
No / little control is required on the right people
▪ Understandability (both employee and boss understand
what is the expected result)
• Cultural controls are often more stable
– The reinforcements / bonus provided Peer pressure makes (i) employees follows the
▪ Links to results and rewards directly corporate culture, (ii) people follows the local culture
群眾壓力令人入鄉隨俗, 否則被迫離去
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Performance better ?
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Harmful side-effects
Costs of Control
Control costs include: Harmful side-effects arising from highly
Direct out-of-pocket costs spending on installation of tight control
control device and paying supervisors’ salary.
Operating delays caused by too tight or too loose 1) Behavioral displacement
control.
Non-financial costs – harmful side-effects from too- 2) Gamesmanship
tight control.
3) Operating delays
Higher control cost is sure
Tighter control 4) Negative attitudes
Better performance is not guarantee
2 Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Human side effect from tight control Human side effect from tight control:
1) Behavioral displacement 2) Gamesmanship
• With results controls, it occurs when the results’ measures • Refers to the actions managers take to improve their
are incongruent with the organization’s true objectives, often personal performance indicators without producing
due to:
– Employee poor understanding of the desired results,
any positive economic effects to the company
or – Data manipulation
– over-emphasis on “measured” results ▪ Trying to “look good” by achieving the control indicators
▪ Ignore what is not counted but also important to the – Data management: eg. affecting the reported results
company through accounting methods
• With action controls, it can be manifested by: – Falsification: reporting incorrect data intentionally
– Means-ends inversion – Creation of slack resources 浪費資源
▪ Employees pay more attention to what they do but lose ▪ Consumption of resources in excess of what is required
sight on the target because the cost is not paid by myself.
– Rigid, non-adaptive, and bureaucratic behavior
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Human side effect from tight control Human side effect from tight control
3) Operating delays 4) Negative attitudes
• Job tension, conflict, frustration, resistance
• Mostly associated with action controls, notably, – Often coincident with many harmful behaviors,
such as gaming, lack of effort, absenteeism, and turnover
delays caused by:
– Lengthy review processes 評審時間長 • Action controls often “irritate” employees
– It is difficult for people to enjoy following a strict set of procedures
– Cumbersome authorization layers in for a long period of time
Bureaucratic organizations 官僚架構有過多管理層
• Results controls
• When responsiveness is important, operational – Lack of employee commitment to the performance targets
delays can be quite costly 對於急於回應事件,管理延 ▪ For example, when targets are too difficult, not meaningful and
uncontrollable, unfair evaluations or inappropriate method of
誤可能引致大損失, For examples, late confirm to
evaluation
customer and lose orders, late delivery etc.
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
▪ Government agencies, banking systems, labor unions, – Power distance potentially affects 當地人對權力認同程度
financial markets, accounting rules, regulations, etc. ▪ Degree of centralization of decision-making 中央集權
Evaluate the center (business unit) by comparing actual sales ▪ “Standard” or “engineered” expense centers (EEC)
▪ Inputs and outputs can be measured in monetary terms
against budgets on regular basis
▪ There is a ‘causal’ relationship between inputs and outputs
Evaluate the manager including financial and non-financial ▪ An example: Manufacturing costs linked to production volume,
measures ▪ “Managed” or “discretionary” expense centers (DEC)
▪ Outputs produced are difficult to measure
Managers of revenue centers are held accountable for ▪ Relationship between inputs and outputs is hard to establish
generating revenues (a financial measure of outputs) but ▪ For example, R&D, human resources departments
ignore expenditures
3 4
2B. Discretionary expense centers
2A. Engineered expense centers
• A common form for administrative and support units, R&D units
Usually found in The units perform • Budgetary control is implemented.
manufacturing repetitive tasks for • Divisional managers are allowed to participate in the planning.
operations, warehousing which standard costs 1.Incremental budgeting
& distribution. can be developed 2.Zero-based budgeting
5 6
Investment centres and Profit centers Investment centers and Profit centers
7 8
3. Profit centers 3. Measuring profitability
Managers of profit centers are held accountable for achieving targeted
profits Comprehensive
• It incorporates many aspects of performance
(human, revenue, cost control, expenditure)
As a measure of Aware 提防
performance, profit is ...
• Higher short-term profit but lower long-term
profit
9 10
11 12
Advantages of delegation Difficulties with delegation
Loss of control if the division is far from head office
The quality of decisions at operational level may
improve Increased friction and cause communication problems
Provide training ground for low-level managers Additional costs on control and duplicated activities.
13 14
15
Outline 1. Objectives of a transfer pricing system
– Cross-division activities and transfer price goods or service
Division A Division B
transfer price
1) Four objectives achieved from a transfer pricing
system It should provide each responsibility center (division) with the
relevant information it needs to determine the optimum trade-off
2) Introduce 3 transfer pricing methods. between company costs and revenues.
3) Main characteristics and management control of It should induce goal-congruent decisions
shared service centers It should help measure the economic performance of the
4) Management control on cross-functional teams individual responsibility center.
5) Summary The system should be simple to understand and easy to
administer.
2 3
6 7
12 13
4. Cross-functional Project Management control and
cross-functional team
• Managers from different responsibility centers work together
in cross-functional teams on a project or an event. • Frequent formal meetings for project task
• Ensure cooperation and coordination between project • Importance of team leaders – cooperation, motivation….
members • Reduce the distance between cross-functional team members
• Challenges the traditional way of managing responsibility if possible
centers • Top management support cross-functional activities
• Need for additional control mechanisms that support the • Project evaluation based on financial and non-financial
horizontal management of cross-functional teams factors
• Bonuses tied to cross-functional team’s outcome and
company performance
14 15
Summary
A transfer pricing scheme is needed for:
➢Goods (intermediate or finished goods) provided from one
responsibility center to another one.
➢Shared service provided to other responsibility centers
Management control:
Budgeting
Top managers decide
(i) The structure of the organization and division of responsibilities.
(ii) Authority of divisional managers to buy inside or outsource,
(iii) Guidelines on transfer pricing system (base of transfer pricing,
profit sharing)
16 1
Planning and budgeting Planning cycle
• Relatively broad processes of thinking
Strategic about the missions, goals, and strategies
Produce written plans that specify:
2 3
6 7
Motivation / Performance
Operational managers are allowed to participate in budgeting:
➢ The budgetee is both involved and has influence over setting the
budget
➢ Leads to better acceptance of budget targets, and hence, commitment
to achieve them by the operational managers
➢ Is an effective way of information sharing bringing together corporate
priorities and constraints with lower-level insights about business
potentials and risks
➢ But, potential for slack, bias (personal benefit), conservatism, … Easy Impossible
Goal Difficulty
8 9
Budget target’s difficulty level Budget target’s difficulty level- easy
In theory (lab experiments): In practice (field research)
“Good targets” are about 25–40% achievable Targets are about 80–90% achievable
Probability
Probability
Target Performance Target Performance
10 11
12 Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Budget gaming
Critique against budgeting
Budget gaming depends on:
• Show a better budget 1.公司制度是否存在玩弄手段機會, 2.個人,
• Creates internal gaming and myopia
that expected - 3. 回報金額大少
• Too resource consuming (time, data collection, exposure • Senior managers
effort, difficult to achieve a compromise….)
• Profitability of the business
• Calendar year is not an appropriate period.
(eg. Academic year start from September) • Show a worse budget • Uncertainty of the market
• Impossible to make a reliable budget that expected - • Reward system
• Makes organizations less flexible hedging • Personality
14 15
Types of budgets
1. Revenue budget (unit & $) and receipt schedules
2. Production budget for manufacturing companies
3. Purchase budget (units and $) and payment schedules
4. Marketing expenses, General and administrative
Incentive Systems and Behaviors
expenses (fixed and variable costs; non-cash items)
5. R&D expenses (People & result controls, budgetary
control)
6. Income Statement and balance sheet (targeted ROI)
7. Capital budget
8. Cash flow statement
Chapter 9
16
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Forms of rewards and punishments Positive and negative incentives
– Monetary
▪ Salary increases
▪ Bonuses • Positive incentives “rewards”
▪ Benefits – Things employees value
▪ Perquisites – Monetary
– Club ▪ No / low salary raise
memberships ▪ No / low bonus • Negative incentives “punishments”
– Vacation trips ▪ Benefits withdrew – Things employees want to avoid
– Non-monetary
▪ Promotion & titles – Non-monetary
▪ Autonomy ▪ No promotion
▪ Recognition ▪ Interference in job • Compensation package short-term
▪ Participation in from superiors
decisions ▪ Loss of job = salary + bonus + benefits + incentive
▪ Office assignments ▪ Assignment to
▪ Preferred parking unimportant tasks long-term
places ▪ Humiliation
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Key elements to be considered Proportion of variable pay
(At-risk pay)
Size of awards (fixed salary vs. at-risk pay) – Performance-based rewards impose risk on the
Level and type of measurement employees as performance is never fully
controllable
– Performance at the individual, group or company level
– Financial vs. non-financial performance; – Across firms, differences in the proportion of “at-
risk” pay are greater than differences in base pay
Single or multiple measures or performance criteria
– Performance not measurable Basic salary
Shape of the incentive-performance function (see p.12)
Use of “subjectivity” – mutual trust between
managers and employee, may cause employee Performance High basic salary + Low commission
frustration, demotivation and friction. measurable Low basic salary + High commission
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Group Bonus Bonus determination
• Objectively- Formal scheme (bonus formula)
• Team-based rewards are often used to – The performance-reward link is explicit
implement personnel / cultural controls
– Avoid bias in assessing and rewarding performance
– Group members monitor and sanction each other’s but
behaviors (mutual monitoring) advantage
– Performance reward scheme cannot be applied on jobs
– Free rider can also get group rewards disadvantage that are difficult to quantify performance. (e.g., R&D, HRM,
accounting)
• Group bonus rarely provides a direct incentive effect • Subjectively
on individual performance
– Allows performance to be evaluated on quality of
– Stock-based plans are more effective for motivating senior performance.
managers and less effective for lower-level employees – Lack of explicitness increases the employee's risk (due to
bias)
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Criteria for evaluating reward systems Criteria for evaluating reward systems
1) Rewards should be valued by employee 4. Rewards should be given in the right time, one-
– Rewards that have no value do not provide off or by installments (cash availability,
motivation employee needs, retention of employee..)
– Reward effect vary across individuals and are 5. Rewards should be durable for motivation
situational 6. Irreversible reward should be carefully given
2) Rewards should be large enough to have impact Promotions, for instance, are difficult to reverse
(encourage, avoid misbehavior)
7. A reward system should be cost efficiency: it is
3) Rewards should be understandable (Reason of not so time consuming or difficult to calculate
bonus) the amount of bonus
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Summary
Copyright © 2018, 2012, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved