NAKHON RATCHASIMA RING ROAD-

SECTION 3 (SOUTH SIDE)

GRAVITY AND MOVING LOAD ANALYSIS (OVER PASS-2)

Span Systems International Co., Ltd.

71/1 พหลโยธิน, Samsen Nai, Phaya Thai, Bangkok 10400
Tel.: (+66) 02 054 5294-5
Fax.: (+66) 02 045 2925

1|Page
CHAPTER – 1
1.1 Typical Geometry

 Span Length 132 m

 Span Length 132 m
 Number of Lanes 2.0
 Lane Width 3.5 m
 Shoulder Width 2.5 m
 Barrier 0.5 m

Fig.1.1: Modelling Grids 5-7 (from EJ to EJ-132m)

1.2 Box Girder Geometry

 Girder Width 12.8 m

 Total Depth 2.3 m
 Web Spacing 7.0 m
 Web Thickness, tw 0.45 m
 Top Slab Thickness, t top 0.23 m
 Bottom44.0m
Slab Thickness, 44.0m t top 0.18 m 44.0m
 Deck Overhang L 3.29 m
 Effective Length, s 3.05 m

2|Page
 Fig.1.2: Typical Box Girder Section

3|Page
CHAPTER – 2
Design Criteria

2.1 Materials

2.1.1 Concrete

Substructure Superstructure

Cap Beam, Column, Stair Grade-40 Precast Segment Grade-50

Footing Pile Cap Grade-40 Cast in place Girder Grade-50
Abutments Grade-40 Precast U-Girder Grade-50
Bored Piles Grade-30 Precast Box Girder Grade-50
R.C Driven Pile Grade-40 C.I.P Deck Slab Grade-40
Precast Driven Pile Grade-40 Safety Barrier Grade-30
Precast Skirts for Footings Grade-50 - -
Box Culvert Grade-40 - -

Table.1.1: Fundamental Properties of Concrete

Grade Cube Cylinder Modulus of Modulus of Equivalent

Strength @ Strength @ Elasticity Fracture Rectangular Stress
28 Days 28 Days (fc') E=4730 √ f 'c f r=0.63 √ f 'c Block Parameter
(fcu) (β)

(MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa)

50 50 42 30700 4.08 0.75
40 40 35 28000 3.73 0.8
30 30 25 23700 3015 0.85

2.1.2 Reinforcing Steel

Type Nominal Yield Ultimate Tensile Modulus of Bar Size
Strength, Strength, Elasticity
fy f u=1.5 f y E

(MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (mm)

SD24 240 360 200000 20-25
SD40 390 585 200000 24-25
SD50 490 735 200000 28-32

2.2 Design Loading

4|Page
2.2.1 Dead Load (DL)

Permanent Loads

 Reinforced Concrete Unit Weight 24.5 kN/m3

 Prestressed Concrete Unit Weight 25.0 kN/m3
 Unit weight of Structural Steel 78.5 kN/m3

Gravity Load (SDL)

 Asphalt wearing surface 1.436 kN/m2 (Area Load)

 Post and Rail 5.107 kN/m (Line Load)

2.2.2 Live Load

Design Vehicle

 Design Lane Load 9.3 kN/m

 Design Tandem Load 110 kN

Fig.2.1: Design Truck Load

 Pedestrian Load 5.0 kN/m2

 Dynamic Load Allowance, Im 33 %

2.3 Critical Load Configurations

5|Page
  Maximum negative moment at the left overhang (Traffic – 1)
(Putting the vehicle wheel load at the distance of 0.3m from the toe of the left barrier)

 Maximum negative moment at the Centerline of the slab (Traffic – 2)

(Putting two design tandem loads at the distance of 0.3m from the toe of the left and
right barrier respectively)

 Maximum positive moment at the Centerline of the slab (Traffic – 3)

(Putting two vehicle wheel loads at the distance of 0.3m from the centerline of the slab
at each side)

2.4 Load Combinations

 1.25DL+1.5SDL

 Strength Limit State -1 1.0 D+1.0 SDL+1.0 (LL+IM)

Service Limit State -1 1.0 D+1.0 SDL+1.0 Traffic-1

Service Limit State -2 1.0 D+1.0 SDL+1.0 Traffic-2
Service Limit State -3 1.0 D+1.0 SDL+1.0 Traffic-3

 Strength Limit State -1 1.25 D+1.5 SDL+1.75 (LL+IM)

Strength Limit State -1 1.25 D+1.5 SDL+2.3 Traffic-1

Strength Limit State -2 1.25 D+1.5 SDL+2.3 Traffic-2
Strength Limit State -3 1.25 D+1.5 SDL+2.3 Traffic-3

6|Page
CHAPTER – 3
Transverse Analysis for Design of Deck (SAP2000)

3.1 Traffic -1 Loading

3.1.1 Axial Force Diagram (kN)

3.1.2 Shear Force Diagram (kN)

3.1.3 Moment Diagram (kN-m)

7|Page
3.2 Traffic -2 Loading

3.2.1 Axial Force Diagram (kN)

3.2.2 Shear Force Diagram (kN)

3.2.3 Moment Diagram (kN-m)

8|Page
3.3 Traffic -3 Loading

\
3.3.1 Axial Force Diagram (kN)

3.3.2 Shear Force Diagram (kN)

3.3.3 Moment Diagram (kN-m)

9|Page
3.4 Envelope

3.4.1 Axial Force Diagram (kN)

Maximum Positive Axial Force 167.65 kN

Maximum Negative Axial Force -436.41 kN

3.4.2 Shear Force Diagram (kN)

Maximum Positive Shear 348.56 kN

Maximum Negative Shear -348.6 kN

3.4.3 Moment Diagram (kN-m)

Maximum Positive Moment 389.1 kN-m

Maximum Negative Moment -431.1 kN-m

10 | P a g e
3.5 Deformed Shapes

3.5.1 Traffic -1 Loading (Max: -9.83 mm)

3.5.2 Traffic -2 Loading (Max: -2.03 mm)

3.5.3 Traffic -3 Loading (Max: -9.38mm)

11 | P a g e
CHAPTER – 4

Longitudinal Analysis for Design of Deck (CSIBridge)

4.1 Structural Analysis

Fig.4.1: 3D Modelling from CSI Bridgev.21

12 | P a g e
4.2 Analysis Results (Dead Loading)

Deflection Limit = L/1000 mm = 44000/1000 = 44 mm

Fig.4.2: Deflection Results

13 | P a g e
 Fig.4.3: Axial Force Diagram (Dead Loading-N)

Fig.4.4: Shear Force Diagram (Dead Loading-KN)

14 | P a g e
 Fig.4.5: Moment Diagram (Dead Loading -KN-mm)

Fig.4.6: Torsion Diagram (Dead Loading -KN-mm)

15 | P a g e
4.3 Vehicle Live Loading Data (HL-93)

Fig.4.7: Vehicle Live Loading Data

a. One Lane a. Both Lanes

Fig.4.8: Vehicle Live Load Cases

16 | P a g e
4.4 Analysis Results

Fig.4.9: Deformed Shape (Envelope Max – 67.89 mm)

Fig.4.10: Axial Force Diagram (Envelope-N)

17 | P a g e
 Fig.4.11: Shear Force Diagram (Envelope-KN)

Fig.4.12: Concrete Box Shear Design Results(Envelope-KN)

18 | P a g e
 Fig.4.13: Moment Diagram (Envelope-KN-m)

Fig.4.14: Torsion Diagram (Envelope-KN-mm)

19 | P a g e
4.5 Stress Distribution Diagram

4.5.1 Stress Limits for Service Loading

Tension Limit
Compression Limit

Fig.4.15: Stress Diagram (S11-X-Direction) (Envelope)

(Tensile: 98.27 Ksc/ Compressive :360.62 Ksc)

Fig.4.16: Stress Diagram (S22-Y-Direction) (Envelope)

(Tensile: 151.9 Ksc/ Compressive :270 Ksc)

20 | P a g e