Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EN 102
Response Essay
4 February 2020
Don’t Be Fake
Is The Daily Show fake news? The Daily Show brings insightful humor and comedy to
today's top headlines and issues. Jason Zinser, a teacher for evolutionary biology and
environmental philosophies at the University of North Florida, argues this question in his article
“The Good, the Bad, and The Daily Show.” Zinser’s article explains the effects of watching The
Daily Show and how “fake” news affects the people watching (363-379). Zinser’s purpose was to
tell whether fake news is harmful or helpful. On the one hand, Zinser correctly argues that
everyone needs to be informed on issues and making those issues comical will help individuals
today be interested; on the other hand, Zinser is correct that important information can easily
come from a skit but is wrong that fictional aspects should be added.
In a democratic state, citizens need to be informed about current issues going on in the
world. Zinser agrees with that statement and goes on to state, “The dissemination of news is
extremely important for them to be informed” (364). I agree that sharing information on current
issues on news shows is important, and this is a point that needs to be emphasized since many
people believe all news they see, even if it is fake news. In other words, accurately informing the
community about relevant issues will help guide the future courses of the country. For instance,
when it comes to elections, individuals need to know information about politics to vote, and
news shows are supposed to be a great source of information. Therefore, I believe that no matter
what source individuals get their information from, they need to know the basics of what is
Keeping viewers tuned into news shows is difficult. However, using comedy and humor
can be helpful. Zinser compares by saying, “Like sneaking vegetables onto a pizza, The Daily
Show delivers the news in a way better suited to our ever-shrinking attention spans” (370). I
agree that comedy and humor hold more viewers’ attention based on my experience in today's
world. The Daily Show informs us in simpler ways for us to be intrigued by what we are
learning. The Daily Show gives enough information for people to know about and understand
certain issues that are going on around the world. This is helpful for viewers who are just
watching for entertainment because the show can sneak in important news facts.
Regardless of the reason people tune in, those who watch are being informed about the
world; however, they are also consuming some fictional elements. Zinser states, “The jokes and
skits are based on, and peppered with, real news items and real stories. Whether people tune in to
be entertained, to be informed, or both, the fact is The Daily Show shapes people’s perspective on
the world” (366). I agree that it is important for people to be informed about world issues, even if
the information has to be comical for them to tune in. Although I agree with Zinser up to a point,
I cannot accept his overall conclusion that news stories should only be “peppered” with facts. If
there are only a couple of facts, viewers are not getting enough information to understand what is
actually going on. In addition, a comedian does not have the qualifications or credibility to talk
about newsworthy events. They create jokes and skits with real elements, but fictional parts are
also added to make it comical for individuals to watch. Overall, comedy skits are great, what
individuals who want to know about world issues but need to learn about them through
entertainment. The idea of making the news stories into jokes and skits helps people today stay
tuned into news issues. However, individuals can be misled because comedians are not telling
the whole story or are adding their own fictional spin. Therefore, I agree with Zinser’s
conclusion that The Daily Show is helpful to entertain individuals but may not always be truly
informative.
Work Cited
Zinser, Jason. "The Good, the Bad, and The Daily Show." They Say I Say with Readings, by
Gerald Graff et al., 2nd ed., New York, W.W. Norton and Company, 2012, pp. 363-379.