Date Developed: Document No.

:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 1 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 2 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 3 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 4 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 TESDA Regional Training Center- Mariveles

ON THE JOB TRAINING EVALUATION

FORM SY: 2021

Dear Trainees:

The following questionnaire is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the

On the Job Training (OJT). Each appropriate box corresponds to your
rating for each question asked. The result of this evaluation shall serve as
a basis for improving the design and management of the OJT to maximize
the benefits of the said program. Thank you for your cooperation.

Legend: 5 – Outstanding
4 – Very good / Very satisfactory
3 – Good/ Adequate
2 – Fair/ Satisfactory
1- Poor/ Unsatisfactory
NA – not applicable

Ite Questi Ratin

m on gs
No.
INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 1 2 3 4 5 NA

Conducted an orientation about the 

1
immersion program, the requirements and
preparations needed and its expectations?

Provided the necessary assistance such as 

2
referrals or recommendations in finding the
company for your immersion?

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 5 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Showed coordination with the Industry partner 
3 assignment and its challenges?

In-school preparations adequate to undertake 

4 Industry partner assignment and its
challenges?

5 Monitored your progress in the
Industry/company?

Supervision been effective in achieving your 

6
immersion program objectives and providing
feedback when necessary?

Conduct assessment of your immersion 

7
program upon
completion?

8 Provided with the result of the Industry and 

assessment of your immersion program?

TOTAL
AVERAGE RATING: Equivalent Rating:

Comments /
Suggestions:

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 6 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Item Question Ratings
No.

INDUSTRY PARTNER/ COMPANY 1 2 3 4 5 NA

1 Was the Industry partner appropriate for 

your type of training required and/or
desired?
2 Has the Industry partner designed the
training to meet your objectives and 
expectations?

3 Has the Industry partner showed coordination

with CCS in the design and supervision of the 
immersion program?

4 Has the Industry partner and its staff welcomed

you and treated you with respect and 
understanding?

5 Has the Industry partner facilitated the

training, including the provision of the 
necessary resources such as facilities and
equipment needed to achieve your
6 Has the Industry partner assigned a supervisor
to oversee your work or training? 

7 Was the supervisor effective in supervising you

through regular meeting, consultations and 
advise?

8 Has the training provided you with the

necessary technical and administrative 
exposure of real world problems and practices?

9 Has the training program allowed you to 

develop self- confidence, self-motivation and
positive attitude towards work?

10 Has the experience improved your personal 

skills and human relations?

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 7 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
11 Are you satisfied with your training? 

TOTAL

Equivalent Very Good

Rating:

AVERAGE RATING: 4

Comments / Suggestions:

Signature:_

Host Industry Partner:

PrintedName:
Supervisor: NORMAN TOLENTINO BUAN

Period of Training:_

OJT Instructor:

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 8 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 TRAINING SESSION EVALUATION REPORT
INSTRUCTIONS:
This post-training evaluation instrument is intended to measure how
satisfactorily your trainer has done his job during the whole duration of
your training. Please give your honest rating by checking on the
corresponding cell of your response. Yours answers will be treated with
utmost confidentiality.
TRAINER/INTRUCTORS
1 2 3 4 5
Name of trainer: Ian Mars P. Acut
1. Orient the trainees

2. Discusses clearly the unit of competencies and
outcomes to be attained at the start of every 
module
3. Exhibits mastery of the subject/course he/she is
teaching 
4. Motivates and elicits active participation from the
students or trainees 
5. Keep records of evidence/s of competency
attainment of each student/trainees 
6. Instill value of safety and orderliness in the 
classrooms and workshops
7. Instills the value of teamwork and positive work 
values
8. Instills good grooming and hygiene 

9. Instills value of time 

10. Quality of voice while teaching 

11. Clarity of language / dialect used in teaching 

12. Provides extra attentions to trainees and students 

with specific learning needs
13. Attends classes regularly and promptly 

14. Shows energy and enthusiasm while teaching 

15. Maximizes use of training supplies and materials 

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 9 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
16. Dresses appropriately

17. Shows empathy

18. Demonstrates self-control


This post training evaluation instrument is intended to measure how

satisfactory you trainer prepared and facilitated your training. Please give
your honest rating by checking on the corresponding cell of your response.
Your answers will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Use the following rating scales:
5 – Outstanding
4 - Very Good/ Very Satisfactory
3 - Good/Adequate
2 - Fair/Satisfactory
1 - Poor/Unsatisfactory

(please rate)
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Workshop layout conforms with the components of
a CBT Workshop 

2. Number of CBLM is sufficient


3. Objectives of very training session is well explained

4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified

DESIGN AND DELIVERY 1 2 3 4 5

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 10 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 1. Course contents are sufficient to attain objectives

2. CBLM are logically organized and presented

3. Information Sheet are comprehensive in providing the
required knowledge 

4. Examples, illustrations and demonstration help you

learn 

5. Practice exercises like Task/Jobs Sheets are

sufficient to learn required skills 

6. Valuable knowledge are learned through the contents

of the course. 

7. Training Methodologies are effective


8. Assessment Methods and evaluation system are
suitable for the trainees and the competency 

9. Recording of achievements and competencies

acquired is prompt and comprehensive 

10. Feedback about performance of learners are given

immediately 

TRAINING FACILITIES AND RESOURCES 1 2 3 4 5

1. Training Resources are adequate

2. Training Venue is conductive and appropriate

3. Equipment, Supplies, and Materials are Sufficient

4. Equipment, Supplies , and Materials are suitable and
appropriate 

5. Promptness is providing Supplies and Materials


SUPPORT STAFF 1 2 3 4 5
1. Support Staff are accommodating


Comments / Suggestions:

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 11 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
RATER 1 (please rate)
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Preparation layout conforms 
with the components of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient

3. Objective of every training
session is well explained 

4. Expected activities/outputs
are clarified 

RATER 2
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Preparation layout conforms

with the components of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient

3. Objective of every training
session is well explained 

4. Expected activities/outputs
are clarified 

RATER 3
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Preparation layout conforms

with the components of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient

3. Objective of every training
session is well explained 

4. Expected activities/outputs
are clarified 

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 12 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
RATER 4
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Preparation layout conforms

with the components of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient

3. Objective of every training
session is well explained 

4. Expected activities/outputs
are clarified 

RATER 5
PREPARATION 1 2 3 4 5
1. Preparation layout conforms 
with the components of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient

3. Objective of every training
session is well explained 

4. Expected activities/outputs
are clarified 

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 13 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Average Ratings

PREPARATION Average

1. Workshop layout conforms with

the components of a CBT
4.8
workshop
2. Number of CBLM is sufficient
4.6
3. Objectives of every training
session is well explained 5

4. Expected activities/outputs are

clarified 5

4.85
General Average

RANGE:
4.50 – 5.00 = Outstanding
3.50 - 4.49 = Very Good/Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.49 = Good/Satisfactory
1.50 – 2.49 = Fair/Adequate
0.00 – 1.49 = Poor/Unsatisfactory

General Interpretation:

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 14 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 The average rating for workshop layout is 4.8 which means
Outstanding and number of CBLM is 4.6 which is also Outstanding and also
Objectives of every training session is 5 which mean Outstanding, for
expected activities/outputs with an average score of 5 means Outstanding.
Finally, the general average is 4.85 thus the result shows it is Outstanding.

Recommendation:

Training Evaluation Report

Title of the Report

PRE-TEST AND POST-TEST ANALYSIS

Executive summary

The purpose of the Pre-test and Post-test is to determine the

trainee’s based knowledge, the readiness for a new learning and to
assess the effectiveness of the training process. This training
evaluation consists of objective aimed at assessing of the trainee’s
computer systems servicing skills, determining the trainee’s
knowledge and effectiveness of the competency-based learning
materials provided in the training.
The average mean and since the data gathered is less than 30,
T-test probability distribution fits for the data analysis. Trainee’s pre-
test and post-test results are compared and shown in a group. Since
the trainees have shown visible learning from the duration of the
training and the post-test score is increasing then it is recommended
that they will proceed to the next competency.
Rationale

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 15 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 The purpose of the pre-test is to determine the underpinning
knowledge and the readiness for new learning. On the other hand, the
post-test is to determine the effectiveness of the training program.
Objectives
The following are the underlying objectives of the training.
To determine if the CBT approach effectively enhance the skills of
the trainees in computer systems servicing.
To find out if the CBT approach effectively improves the
underpinning knowledge and work attitude of trainees to computer
systems servicing.
To assess the quality of the training program in terms of
attainment of the computer systems servicing competency
standards.
To investigate whether the training activity needs to be redesign or
discontinued.
To evaluate whether the CBT lay-out and resources effectively
improve the trainee’s competency in computer systems servicing
underpinning knowledge, skills and attitude.

Methodology

The training program evaluation was administered through

varied assessment materials. This is done to comprehensively obtain
information or feedback on the effects of training program, assess the
value of the training in the light of that information and improve the
training program as a whole. The following are the common evaluation
methods used throughout the training program.

Written Test (Pre-test, Post-test, Self-Check, et al…)

Demonstration with questioning
Observation with questioning
Self-Checklist/Evaluation
Performance Checklist
Rating Sheets
Document Review
Portfolio
Group Discussion

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 16 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Results and discussion

SCORE
PERFECT SCORE: 40

NO Name of Trainee PRE-TEST SCORE POST-TEST SCORE

1 Ambe, Raul Sorobin 32 33

2 Asuncion, Jessica 30 34
3 Asuncion, Jances 34 30
4 Atig, Jessa Melon 31 31
5 Aton, Flordeliz Cabrillas 32 30
6 Baghari, Camille Faith 32 33
Galimba
7 Basa, Rizalyn Aquino 29 36
8 Branola, Saralyn 28 32
9 Carulasan, Richlyn 29 31
10 Montecillo, Arjay 35 36

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 17 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
11 Nable, Karen 31 33
12 Nacion, Angel Ortaliza 30 38
13 Pancho, Ferlyn 35 35
14 Romaguera, Raquel 31 32
15 Villamon, Fe Salva 30 36

i. Data interpretation

Comparing the results for the data interpretation for both the
Pre-test and Post-test, the table of
values shows that most of the trainee got a higher score in
Post-test compared to Pre-test. This means that the training is
effective because their scores improved.
ii. Data analysis

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 18 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Data analysis shows that the total number of
test conducted on 15 trainees have a mean value of
31.27 for Pre-test score and
33.33 for Post-test score, Standard Deviation of 2.12 for
Pre-test Score and Standard Deviation of 2.44 for Post-
test Score.
The table shows that the t Statistics is equal to
-2.48 which refers to the difference between the pre-test
and the post-test score. The P-Value is 0.020 which is
smaller than 0.05, this means that the Confidence
Interval of 95% between (-3.779, -0.354) has a greater
chance of having this data to be true and valid, this
means that the test score has no significant difference.

iii. Conclusion
As shown in the above mentioned analysis of data,
the intervention made during the Competency Based
Training in Computer Systems Servicing NC II is
effectively increased the learnings and skills of the trainee.

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 19 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
Recommendation
Competency Based Training in Computer
Systems Servicing NC II is therefore recommended for use as a
medium of instructions in University of Southern
Philippines Foundation Senior High School students while
using Competency Based Learning Materials.

Date Developed: Document No.:

December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 20 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 21 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 22 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 23 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 24 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 25 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 26 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning
 Date Developed: Document No.:
December 2020
Computer Systems
Servicing NC II Page 27 of 31
COC1 Developed by: Revision No.:
JARVEN T.
SAGUIN
Supervised Work Based Learning