Ms. Kamala Timilsina: Structural Report

You might also like

You are on page 1of 35

A

STRUCTURAL REPORT
OF
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
OF

Ms. KAMALA TIMILSINA


AT

TIKATHALI-01, LALITPUR

SUBMITTED TO:
LALITPUR MINICIPALITY
KATHMANDU
Table of Contents
1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................4

1.1 General....................................................................................................................................4

1.2 Project Location......................................................................................................................4

1.3 Access......................................................................................................................................4

1.4 Site Area..................................................................................................................................4

1.5 Anatomy of Building...............................................................................................................4

1.6 Description of the Building.....................................................................................................5

1.7 Scope and Limitation..............................................................................................................6

2 Load Cases.....................................................................................................................................6

2.1 Codes of Practices...................................................................................................................6

2.2 Load Pattern............................................................................................................................7

2.3 Loading Combinations (IS 1893: PART 1).............................................................................7

3 Design Parameters..........................................................................................................................8

3.1 Structural System....................................................................................................................8

3.2 Construction Materials:...........................................................................................................8

3.3 Construction Materials Properties:..........................................................................................8

4 Load Calculation............................................................................................................................8

4.1 Dead Load Intensities..............................................................................................................8

4.2 Live Load................................................................................................................................8

4.3 Seismic Load...........................................................................................................................8

5 Structural Analysis.......................................................................................................................10

5.1 Finite Element Modeling of the Building.............................................................................10

5.2 Load Assignments in ETABS...............................................................................................11

5.3 Output from ETABS.............................................................................................................13

5.4 Output from SAFE................................................................................................................18

6 Sample Design Calculation..........................................................................................................21

6.1 Column Design......................................................................................................................21


6.2 Beam Design.........................................................................................................................24

6.3 SLAB DESIGN.....................................................................................................................26

6.4 Structural Details...................................................................................................................27

7 Annex...........................................................................................................................................28

7.1 Story Drift.............................................................................................................................28

7.2 Acceptability Criteria............................................................................................................28

7.3 Torsion Irregularity Check....................................................................................................29

8 Structural Design Check List.......................................................................................................30


1 Introduction
1.1 General
The purpose of this report is to summarize design methodology, structural calculation and design
output of proposed residential building of MS. KAMALA TIMILSINA. The data inputs, analysis,
calculations and outputs are computer aided by the structural analysis software ETABS v16.2.1 and
SAFE v16.0.1. The seismic design of the building is done and the brief has been prepared.

1.2 Project Location


The proposed project is situated at Tikathali-01, Lalitpur.

1.3 Access
The site is connected via 7’ wide road in West direction.

1.4 Site Area


The Total Land Area of the proposed project (as per field measurement) is 1112.45 sq. ft.

The proposed building is a 4 storey Residential building.

1.5 Anatomy of Building


The vertical or gravity load carrying system of the building comprises a system of vertical columns
interconnected by horizontal beams, which supports the floors and roofing. The components of a
typical RCC-framed structure are:

 Foundation
 Column
 Beam
 Slab
 Staircase
 Wall

4
1.6 Description of the Building
Building Type Residential cum Storage Building
Location Balaju, Kathmandu, Nepal
Total Land Area 1112.45 sq. ft.
Plinth Area 565.00 sq. ft.
Structural system Special Moment Resisting Frame structure
Soil type Medium Soil
Seismic zone Zone V
Bearing Capacity 120 kN/m2
Foundation Isolated Foundation with Strap Beams
Number of storey 5
Top storey height 9’5”
Floor to floor height 9’5”
Width of wall at Partition &
4”Partition Wall, 9” Peripheral Wall
Peripheral
i. Dead Load
Type of loads ii. Live Load as per IS 875 part II
iii. Earthquake induced load as per IS 1893
Analysis Tools ETABS v16.2.1, SAFE v16.0.1
DESIGN SUMMARY
Main Beam - 9”x14”,
Size of Beam Secondary Beam - 9”x12”

Size of Column 14”x14”


Depth of Slab 5”
Type of Staircase Dog Legged Staircase
Column - M25
Beam - M20
Grade of Concrete
Footing – M20
Slab – M20
Fe500 (Main Longitudinal Bars)
Grade of Steel
Fe 415 (Stirrups)

5
1.7 Scope and Limitation
The report is based in the architectural drawing provided.

2 Load Cases
2.1 Codes of Practices

Following codes of practices developed by Bureau of Indian Standards and Nepal National Building
Codes were followed in the analysis and design of building:

1. Nepal National Building Codes

a. NBC 101 (Material Specifications)

b. NBC 102 (Unit Weight of Materials)

c. NBC 103 (Occupancy Loads)

d. NBC 105 (Seismic Design of Buildings)

e. NBC 110 (Plain and Reinforced Concrete)

2. Indian Standard

a. IS 456:2000 (Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete)

b. IS 1893 (part 1):2002 (Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures)

c. IS 13920: 1993 (Code of practice for ductile detailing of reinforced concrete


structures subjected to seismic forces)

d. IS 875 (part 1):1987 (to assess dead loads)

e. IS 875 (part 2):1987 (to assess live loads)

f. SP 16, SP 24 and SP 34 (design aids and hands book)

6
2.2 Load Pattern
TABLE: Load Patterns
Name Type Self Weight Multiplier Auto Load
       
Dead Dead 1  
Live Load Live 0  
Floor Finish Dead 0  
9inch wall load Dead 0  
5inchwall load Dead 0
Parapet Load Dead 0  
Seismi
EQx c 0 IS1893 2002
Stair load Dead 0
Seismi
EQy c 0 IS1893 2002
`

2.3 Loading Combinations (IS 1893: PART 1)


LOAD COMBINATIONS
i. 1.5 (DL)
ii. 1.5 (DL + LL)
iii. 1.2 (DL + LL + EQx+0.3EQy)
iv. 1.2 (DL + LL - EQx+0.3EQy)
v. 1.2 (DL + LL + EQy+0.3EQx)
vi. 1.2 (DL + LL – EQy+0.3EQx)
vii. 1.5 (DL + EQx+0.3EQy)
viii. 1.5 (DL - EQx+0.3EQy)
ix. 1.5 (DL + EQy+0.3EQx)
x. 1.5 (DL - EQy+0.3EQx)
xi. 0.9DL + 1.5EQx+0.3EQy
xii. 0.9DL - 1.5EQx+0.3EQy
xiii. 0.9DL + 1.5EQy+0.3EQx
xiv. 0.9DL - 1.5EQy+0.3EQx

7
3 Design Parameters
3.1 Structural System
Since, the building has number of plane frames along both directions; 3D frame analysis has been
done. The frames are analyzed as Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF).
3.2 Construction Materials:
External Wall Materials : 4” Brick Masonry
Internal Wall Materials : 4” Brick Masonry
Brick : 1st class Local bricks of compressive strength of 100 kg/cm2
Sand : Specification as per IS Code
Aggregate : Specification as per IS Code
Grade of Concrete : Column – M25, Beam – M20
Grade of Steel : Fe500 TMT Steel
3.3 Construction Materials Properties:
AAC Block Masonry = 7.36 kN/m3, IS : 875 (Part 1) - 1987
Brick Masonry density = 19.2 kN/m3, IS : 875 (Part 1) - 1987

4 Load Calculation
4.1 Dead Load Intensities
8” AAC Block Masonry = 5.37 KN/m
6” AAC Block Masonry = 4.35 KN/m
Partition Load intensities = 1.00 KN/m2
Floor Finish = 1.20 KN/m2
Parapet wall = 2.40 kN/m
Stair load = 9.50 kN/m and 8.5KN/m

4.2 Live Load


All rooms for storage use = 2.0 kN/m2 {IS 875 (Part 2) 1987-Table 1}
Toilet and bath rooms = 3.0 kN/m2 {IS 875 (Part 2) 1987-Table 1}
Corridors, passages, staircases
including fire escapes and store
rooms = 3.0 kN/m2 {IS 875 (Part 2) 1987-Table 1}
Terrace with access provided = 1.5 kN/m2 {IS 875 (Part 2) 1987-Table 2}
Terrace with access not provided = 0.75 kN/m2 {IS 875 (Part 2) 1987-Table 2}
(Except for Maintenance)

4.3 Seismic Load


Lateral load acting on the buildings is seismic load and wind load. But seismic load is predominant
in case of RCC building situated on Kathmandu valley.
So, the seismic load is calculated by seismic coefficient method as per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002
Seismic Load = As per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002
Seismic coefficient method considers the calculation of base shear of the building considering
different factors. It also realizes each storey as a lumped mass system and distributes the base shear
to all lump mass systems.

8
Seismic coefficient is calculated as per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002.
Seismic Zone Factor Z Cl 6.4.2, Table 2 0.36  
Importance Factor I Cl 6.4.2, Table 6 1.2  
Response Reduction Factor R Cl 6.4.2, Table 7 5  
Height of the building h Refer Drawing 11.4 m
Time Period of the building Along X Tx Cl 7.6.1 0.465 Sec
Time Period of the building Along Y Ty Cl 7.6.1 0.465 Sec
Soil Type Type II  
Spectral Acceleration Coefficient Sa/g Cl 6.4.5, Fig 2 2.5  
Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah Cl 6.4.2 0.09  
Seismic Weight of Building W From ETABS 2189.87 kN
Base Shear VB Cl 7.5.3 197.09 kN

9
5 Structural Analysis
5.1 Finite Element Modeling of the Building
The space frame is modeled using Integrated Building Design Software ETABS v16.2.0 and the
foundation system is modeled using SAFE v16.0.1. The loads are taken as per above
calculations and design data considered.
Figure 5.4.4 shows the finite element model of the building, modelled with ETABs v16
software:

Figure 5-5.1-i: 3D model of building

10
5.2 Load Assignments in ETABS

Figure 5.2- : Terrace Live Load

Figure 5.2- iii: Typical Floor Live Load

11
Figure 5.2-iii: Typical Floor Finish Load

Figure 5.2- iv: 4" Wall Load

12
5.3 Output from ETABS

Figure 5.3-v: Joint Reaction for 1.5(LL+DL)

Figure 5.3-vi: AFD for 1.5(DL+LL)

13
Figure 5.3- vii: In plane shear diagram for 1.5(DL+LL)

Figure 5.3- viii: Inplane moment diagram for 1.5(DL+LL)

14
15
Figure 5.3-ix: Longitudinal Reinforcement Demand Frame 1

Figure 5.3- x: Longitudinal Reinforcement Demand Frame 2

Figure 5.3-xi: Longitudinal Reinforcement Demand Frame 3

16
Figure 5.3-xii: Longitudinal Reinforcement Demand Frame C

Figure 5.3xiiiii: Longitudinal Reinforcement Demand Frame A

17
5.4 Output from SAFE

Figure 5.4-xiv: Punching Shear

Comment: Strap Beams are provided. So punching shear is not shown as not applicable

18
Figure 5.4-xv: Soil Pressure Diagram under Service Load

Comment: 300 mm thick sub base grading material (as per DoR Specification) compacted at 95% is
proposed below the raft foundation so as to improve the bearing capacity of the existing soil.

19
Figure 5.4-xvi: Displacement/Settlement under Service Load

Figure 5.4- xvii: Top Reinforcement


20
6 Sample Design Calculation
6.1 Column Design

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Sway Special (Summary)


Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 C6 42 C2(14"X14") 1.5(DL-EQy-0.3EQx) 2667 2844.8 0.759

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
355.6 355.6 65.2 28.1

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters


ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3


Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors


K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0 0 0 0 0
Minor Bend(M2) 0 0 0 0 0

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3


Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 0 0 0 0 0
Minor, Vu3 0 0 0 0 0

21
Joint Shear Check/Design
Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio


Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)


Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
0 0 0 0 0 0

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)


Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0 0 0 0 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0 0 0 0 No 0

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

Section
    Group

22
FLOO Column 1 1 2 2 2
COLUMN ETABs  
R Size 2 6 0 5 8

1
4       2865.13
A1 1 2841 14"X14" 2
1
4       2865.13
2 1726   2
C1
1
        2412.74
3 1366   2
1
        2412.74
4 1683   2
1
        2412.74
A2 1 2375 14"X14" 2
1
        2412.74 C2
2 2158   2
3 1833   4 8       2060.88
4 1739   4 8       2060.88
A3 1 1859 14"X14" 4 8       2060.88
2 1189   4 8       2060.88 C3
3 1774   4 8       2060.88
1 1696 14"X14" 4 8       2060.88
B4 2 1012   4 8       2060.88 C3
3 1098     8       1608.50
1
4       2865.13
1 2720 14"X14" 2
1
4       2865.13
2 1531   2
C1 C1
1
        2412.74
3 1125   2
1
        2412.74
4 1134   2
1
        2412.74
C2 1 2226 14"X14" 2
1
        2412.74 C2
2 1919   2
3 1512   6 6       1884.96
4 1728   6 6       1884.96
C3 1 1815 14"X14" 4 8       2060.88
2 1384   4 8       2060.88 C3
3 1770   4 8       2060.88
C4 1 1702 14"X14" 4 8       2060.88
2 1012   4 8       2060.88 C3
3 1377   4 8       2060.88

23
6.2 Beam Design

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Sway Special (Summary)


Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 C6 42 C2(14"X14") 1.5(DL-EQy-0.3EQx) 2667 2844.8 0.759

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
355.6 355.6 65.2 28.1

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters


ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3


Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors


K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0 0 0 0 0
Minor Bend(M2) 0 0 0 0 0

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3


Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 0 0 0 0 0
Minor, Vu3 0 0 0 0 0

24
Joint Shear Check/Design
Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio


Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)


Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
0 0 0 0 0 0

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)


Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0 0 0 0 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0 0 0 0 No 0

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

25
6.3 SLAB DESIGN

fy 500 N/mm2
fck 20 N/mm2
d' 20 mm
DESIGN OF TWO WAY SLAB

Type Se lf Partition Moment Spacing Spacing


lx Ly d D FF LL BM dreq D AstFinal Ф

Check
Slab of Weight Load Coefficient require provided
No. Pane kN/m
(m) (m) (mm) (mm) kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 Value (kNM) (mm) d+d' (mm2) (mm) ( ") ( ")
l 2

Slab at ground floor level


3.50 4.07 107.00 127.00 0.0572 7.80 54 74 OK 241.90 8 6.0
3.50 4.07 107.00 127.00 0.043 5.87 47 67 OK 219.37 8 9.02 6.0
13 4 3.18 1.00 1.25 2.00
3.50 4.07 107.00 127.00 0.047 8.66 57 77 OK 284.60 8 6.95 6.0
3.50 4.07 107.00 127.00 0.035 6.45 49 69 OK 233.83 8 8.46 6.0

26
DEFLECTION CHECK (IS 456:2000, cl 23.2.1)

a b c d a*b*c*d l/d Check


cl 23.2.1 a cl 23.2.1 b cl 23.2.1 c cl 23.2.1 d
23 1 1.6 1 36.8 33 OK

Ast required 284.60 mm2


Ast provided 329.83 mm2
fs 250 N/mm2
6.4 pt 0.31 % Structural
Details
Foundation Details
Type of foundation: Isolated with Strap Beams
Concrete Grade: M20
Reinforcement Grade: Fe500 – Longitudinal Reinforcement
Grade: Fe 415 - Stirrups
Clear Cover: 50 mm
**Refer Structural Drawing**

Column Details
Size: 14”x14”
Concrete Grade: M25
Reinforcement Grade: Grade: Fe500 – Longitudinal Reinforcement
Grade: Fe 415 - Stirrups
Clear Cover: 40 mm
**Refer Structural Drawing**

Beam Details
Primary beam size: 9”x14”
Secondary beam size: 9”x12”
Concrete Grade: M20
Reinforcement Grade: Fe500 – Longitudinal Reinforcement
Grade: Fe 415 - Stirrups
Clear Cover: 25 mm
**Refer Structural Drawing**

Slab Details
Thickness: 5”
Concrete Grade: M20
Reinforcement Grade: Fe500
Clear Cover: 15 mm
**Refer Structural Drawing**

Staircase Details
Waist slab thickness: 5”
Concrete Grade: M20
Reinforcement Grade: Fe500
Clear Cover: 15 mm
**Refer Structural Drawing**

27
7 Annex
7.1 Story Drift
As per Clause no. 7.11.1 of IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016, the storey drift in any storey due to specified
design lateral force with partial load factor of 1.0, shall not exceed 0.004 times the storey height.
From the frame analysis the displacements of the mass centres of various floors are obtained and are
shown in Table 4 along with storey drift. Since the building configuration is same in both the
directions, the displacement values are same in either direction.

7.2 Acceptability Criteria


TABLE: Story Drifts            
Directio
Story Load Case/Combo n Drift Label X Y Z
          m m m
Story 0.00174 11.379
4 EQx 1 X 2 12 5.7912 0 2
Story 0.00250
3 EQx 1 X 9 12 5.7912 0 8.5344
Story 0.00276
2 EQx 1 X 6 12 5.7912 0 5.6896
Story 0.00163
1 EQx 1 X 3 7 0 0 2.8448
Story 0.00169 11.379
4 EQx 2 X 5 5 4.6736 4.318 2
Story 0.00214
3 EQx 2 X 9 12 5.7912 0 8.5344
Story 0.00234
2 EQx 2 X 9 12 5.7912 0 5.6896
Story 0.00137
1 EQx 2 X 2 7 0 0 2.8448
Story 0.00202 11.379
4 EQx 3 X 9 12 5.7912 0 2
Story 0.00286
3 EQx 3 X 9 12 5.7912 0 8.5344
Story 0.00318
2 EQx 3 X 3 12 5.7912 0 5.6896
Story 0.00189
1 EQx 3 X 4 7 0 0 2.8448
Story 0.00114 11.379
4 EQy 1 Y 9 12 5.7912 0 2
Story 0.00122
3 EQy 1 Y 3 12 5.7912 0 8.5344
Story 0.00146
2 EQy 1 Y 4 12 5.7912 0 5.6896
Story 0.00096
1 EQy 1 Y 3 6 4.6736 0 2.8448
Story 0.00126 11.379
4 EQy 2 Y 2 12 5.7912 0 2
Story 0.00130
3 EQy 2 Y 7 12 5.7912 0 8.5344
Story EQy 2 Y 0.00156 12 5.7912 0 5.6896

28
2 1
Story 0.00100
1 EQy 2 Y 4 6 4.6736 0 2.8448
Story 0.00112 11.379
4 EQy 3 Y 9 7 0 0 2
Story 0.00124
3 EQy 3 Y 7 7 0 0 8.5344
Story 0.00150
2 EQy 3 Y 3 7 0 0 5.6896
Story 0.00099
1 EQy 3 Y 5 7 0 0 2.8448

7.3 Torsion Irregularity Check

TABLE: Story Max/Avg


Displacements      
Load Directio Maximu Averag
Story Case/Combo n m e Ratio
      mm mm  
Story
4 EQx 1 X 24.607 22.575 1.09
Story
3 EQx 1 X 19.652 15.28 1.286
Story
2 EQx 1 X 12.515 9.871 1.268
Story
1 EQx 1 X 4.646 3.679 1.263
Story
4 EQx 2 X 20.835 20.558 1.013
Story
3 EQx 2 X 16.696 15.19 1.099
Story
2 EQx 2 X 10.584 9.801 1.08
Story
1 EQx 2 X 3.903 3.652 1.069
Story
4 EQx 3 X 28.379 24.591 1.154
Story
3 EQx 3 X 22.607 15.37 1.471
Story
2 EQx 3 X 14.445 9.941 1.453
Story EQx 3 X 5.389 3.706 1.454
29
1
Story
4 EQy 1 Y 13.567 13.372 1.015
Story
3 EQy 1 Y 10.35 10.266 1.008
Story
2 EQy 1 Y 6.889 6.843 1.007
Story
1 EQy 1 Y 2.74 2.725 1.006
Story
4 EQy 2 Y 14.248 13.367 1.066
Story
3 EQy 2 Y 10.815 10.262 1.054
Story
2 EQy 2 Y 7.194 6.839 1.052
Story
1 EQy 2 Y 2.857 2.723 1.049
Story
4 EQy 3 Y 13.867 13.376 1.037
Story
3 EQy 3 Y 10.655 10.27 1.038
Story
2 EQy 3 Y 7.106 6.846 1.038
Story
1 EQy 3 Y 2.83 2.726 1.038

The Story Max/Avg Displacement is less more 1.500 for some diaphragms under lateral forces
acting with design eccentricity. So, according to IS 1893 (Part1):2002 Clause 7.1, the building is
considered as torsionally irregular. But, the ratio is under 1.4000 hence extreme torsion irregularity
doesn’t exist.

30
8 Structural Design Check List

AS PER SUBMITTED
BUILDING ELEMENTS REMARKS
DESIGN

GENERAL

Building Structure Type RCC Frame Structure

Number of storey applied for permit (in Nos.) 4

Number of storey considered in structural design (in Nos.) 4

If Computer Aided Design (CAD) is used, please state the


ETABS, SAFE
name of the software package

☐Yes
Provision for further extension
☒No

Total height (h) of structure with extension (in m) 11.379

NBC 101-1994 MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS

☐Structural Aluminium
☐Brick Masonry
Materials to be used in structure(tick the listed materials ☐Timber
that will be used in structure element) ☐Structural Steel
☒RCC (Reinforcement Bar)
☐Stone Masonry

NBC 102-1994 UNIT WEIGHT OF MATERIALS

Specify the design unit weight of materials: Steel (in KN/m3) 78.5

Specify the design unit weight of materials: RCC (in KN/m3) 25

Specify the design unit weight of materials: Brick Masonry


19.2
(in KN/m3)

NBC 103-1994 OCCUPANCY LOAD (IMPOSED LOAD)

For Residential buildings

Occupancy Load (Uniformly Distributed load in kN/m2) for


2.0
Rooms and Kitchens

Occupancy Load (Uniformly Distributed load in kN/m2) for


3.0
Corridor, Staircase, Store

Occupancy Load (Uniformly Distributed load in kN/m2) for


3.0
Balcony

NBC 104-1994 WIND LOAD

31
Wind Zone 1 NOT APPLICABLE

Basic wind speed (in m/s) 47 NOT APPLICABLE

NBC 105-1994 SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS IN NEPAL

☒Seismic Coefficient Approach


Method adopted for earthquake resistant design ☐Response Spectrum Method
☐Others

Adopted Code for Seismic Design IS:1893-2002

☐Type I (Hard)
Subsoil category ☒Type II (Medium)
☐Type III (Soft)

Seismic Weight (W) (in kN) 2189.87

Fundamental Time Period of the building along X (Tx) (in


0.465
Seconds)

Fundamental Time Period of the building along Y(Ty) (in


0.6465
Seconds)

Seismic zoning factor (Z) 0.36

Importance Factor (I) 1.0

Response reduction factor (R) 5

Spectral acceleration coefficient (Sa/g) along X 2.5

Spectral acceleration coefficient (Sa/g) along Y 2.5

Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Along X (Ah) 0.09

Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Along Y (Ah) 0.09

Base Shear(VB) for Seismic Coefficient Along X 197.09

Base Shear(VB) for Seismic Coefficient Along Y 197.09

Maximum Inter-storey Drift (mm) 8.0

Corresponding Storey height for Maximum Inter- Storey


2884
Drift (h)(mm)

Maximum Inter-storey Drift Ratio 0.002766

NBC 106-1994 SNOW LOAD

☐Perennial
Snowfall type or condition ☐Occasional
☒No snowfall

32
NBC 107-1994 PROVISIONAL RECOMMENDATION ON FIRE SAFETY

☒Yes
Have you considered fire safety requirement?
☐No

NBC 108-1994 SITE CONSIDERATION FOR SEISMIC HAZARDS

Whether Distance of construction site from toe/beginning of ☐Yes


downward slope is within 50m? ☒No

Whether Distance of construction site from river bank is ☐Yes


within 50m? ☒No

☐Yes
Availability of soil test report
☒No

NBC 114-1994 CONSTRUCTION SAFETY

Are you sure that all safety measures will be fulfilled in the ☒Yes
construction site as per this code? ☐No

☒Safety hard hat


☒Safety goggles
Safety wares used ☒Safety boots
☒Safety belts
☒First aid facility

STRUCTURAL DATA FOR FRAMED RCC STRUCTURE

NBC 110-1994 PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE

☒M20
☒M25
Concrete grade in structure
☐M30
☐M35

☒Fe-415
Reinforcement Steel Grade ☒Fe-500
☐Fe-550

SLAB DESIGN

☐4 side continuous
☐1 short side discontinuous
☐1 long side discontinuous
☒2 adjacent side continuous
Boundary condition of slab ☐2 long side continuous
☐2 short side continuous
☐1 long side continuous
☐1 short side continuous
☐4 side discontinuous

Effective Thickness of slab (d) (in mm) 107

33
Short span of Critical slab panel (L) (in mm) 3500

Calculated short span to effective depth ratio (L/d) for the


32.71
corresponding slab

Basic (L/d) ratio 23

Required modification factor for tension reinforcement 1.42

Required Tension reinforcement(Ast) for short span bottom


284.60 mm2
reinforcement

Provided Tension reinforcement(Ast) for short span bottom


329.83 mm2
reinforcement

Actual Modification factor for tension reinforcement 1.6

CHECK FOR CRITICAL BEAM

Effective depth of beam (d) (in mm) 406.4

Critical span (L) (in mm) 4980

☐Cantilever
☐Simply supported
Support condition
☐One side continuous
☒Both side continuous

Basic (L/d) ratio 26

Calculated critical span to effective depth ratio (L/d) 13.26

CHECK FOR CRITICAL COLUMN

Critical column height (mm) 2844.8

Minimum size of column (mm x mm) 355.6 x355.6

☒Yes
Short column effect considered or not
☐No

Minimum area of longitudinal reinforcement provided (%) 1.35

Design Philosophy Limit State method

LOAD COMBINATIONS

1: DL 1.5

1: LL 1.5

2: DL 1.2

2: LL 1.2

2: EQ 1.2

34
3: DL 1.5

3: EQ 1.5

4: DL 0.9

4: EQ 1.5

Whether sample design calculations of foundations, columns, ☒Yes


beams and slabs are submitted
☐No

☐PILE
☒Strap
Type of Foundations ☐Isolated
☐Combined
☐Raft

Depth of foundation from ground level to the bottom of


NA
footing (in m)

35

You might also like