- - r _ _ Jar_ ,,,,_ - 函吶 心亮右 ~~J 帚

乙~Testing
F「 `、~· ('v· ·<..e~、一
":'<'~::,0&' _ _, t:.quauon tor t-1re Kes1stance o, a
Blllli!in.g
一
一.,.
~ requirements for the building
e rrorrn 缸 nee
~;;,:i品 such as walls, floors, suspended ceilings, Ire resistance required .
fir •9 m any building is given by
D l cotumns, beams, lintels, glazing and roofs are (Margaret Law):
published in BRE report.
L
• This may be useful for assessing the likel tf =瓦
y fire .
resistance of constructions used in
hotels, boarding
houses, industrial build"mgs, etc.
tr: Fire resistance period (min)
L: Total fire load (kg equivalent of wood)
~: Area of window opening (m2)
~: Area of walls and ceilings excluding windows (m2)
t:qua11on ror r-1re t<es1stance or a
Doors
B_u il!ljng
云 Rewnte: - ; •. · -. Floor area
- ne method for describing the performance of fire

,.、+，'
L~ doors is to define two types of door, i.e. fire resisting
｀－元氐＿－心 door and smoke control door.
A

鼻＇
• The performance of the fire resisting door can be
= !d 戸 assessed by the BS 476 furnace, but there is no
F「 Load density ' standard method for testing smoke control doors.
• The ·International Standards Organization (ISO) is
considering to develop tests for assessing such doors.
 ＾＂＂＇一 1ca"a5c uu• a• .. u11:.,a11, t''c:.~u, c
Smoke Contro l Tests Design of -Smoke Sea\
re Resistanc e Test and Smoke Control Test are two
different tests.
The door is latched or unlatched ?
—·
• Will the door use panic device?
- The test are conducted separately with the use of different
equipment
·The present of meeting edge for double-lea f door'i
_ Tests are conducted under different test conditions
• The profile of meeting edge: Plain or rebated?
• Under fire test, the door subjected to over 1,000°C and 20 Pa
• Under smoke test, the door subjected to 200°C and up to 50 Pa • Fire test evidence for the use of smoke seals?
_ The door with the same fire and smoke seal protection
subject to the fire resistant test and smoke control test
separately
1