Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. 1.1Personal Reflection
I am very excited to write this about me and what I truly think about the person I have come to know
after the course.
I am outgoing, dynamic and highly strung I am calm and very confident, and I am motivated with a
lot of energy that can come across as intimidating and aggressive to others.
I love to achieve the desired results that I set for myself in any situation. I love to be challenged which
pushes to do anything to the best of my ability. I always love to lead and push others into action
because I love to win.
I share goals and I can motivate others to work. I am mature and trusting I have no issues to delegate.
I am a very emotional person I do not shy away from expressing myself when I am disappointed and
frustrated. I cry and express myself when I am disappointed.
I love to have control over any situation, I handle confrontation with facts not with emotions, I am
very cautious of how I want the confrontation to end I handle them well.
I am a manager that generate action and thrive on pressure, I spot talent easy and delegate workload
accordingly making sure that I have a diverse team of people that are willing to work together.
I rise above all my problems with a smile and I soldier on. I am a straight talker who does not mind
being unpopular because of decisions that need to be taken.
I was happy to know, and I do agree that I generally command respect.
Respect and communication are key things to me, they both generate trust.
Strengths:
My positive energy and drive, the fact that I am always ready to challenge inactivity, ineffectiveness,
inefficiency and self-deception.
I welcome everyone’s contribution looking into merit without being bias with the focus on the
objective.
One of the things I had to understand with my management skills is that I do consider followers at any
situation- their ability and experience is more important to me. Their willingness to take responsibility
with accountability is what I emphasise in a Team.
I am willing to learn and trainable to better fit the style of the followers but clearly out line the
expectations and understand their readiness readiness
Weakness:
One of the most weakness I have had to overcome was Assumptions…
Assuming that people will easily adapt to my style of doing things without communication.
How difficult it was for me to improve on that personally meant:
I had to learn more flexible in my way of doing things
o I needed to read the situations better
Strive to get the teams to be more willing and able to improve in situations.
I have no as regards to intellectual or creative ability.
I am very likely to provocation, I can see when people when people try to undermine and want to
ridicule me.
I can see when people are irritated and impatient, I can also read when there is a tendency of
offending others.
I am very persuasive my scores reflect to that, I have the tendency to try to stand up for oneself
without being pushy, a hands-on approach to conflict and willingness to collaborate.
My Unique Attributes:
I am above average on numerical ability, I pay attention to detail and accuracy.
I can work independently and under pressure without any supervision, I have excellent
Communication & Presentation skills.
I am a positive team player, self-starter and results driven individual. I need to be challenged to
develop my potential further.
I am a creative and dynamic person with a proactive and can-do attitude and an open-minded
personality.
I have optimal interpersonal skills which allow me to relate well with people at all levels and with my
strong communication skills I am able to create trustworthy and fair relationships.
I have a lot of experience in Manufacturing: I am able to work under pressure, to collaborate with
cross functional teams and to handle deadlines as a result.
I am a vibrant self-motivated & target driven individual, a hard worker who is willing to work
independently under pressure without any supervision.
My daily objective is to achieve daily goals that I set for myself.
I am very organized with time management that never misses what needs to be done.
I can achieve thoroughness and accuracy when accomplishing any given task.
I am a very good problem solver and team collaborator who is willing to contribute to a creative team.
I am fluent in both oral and written English, I can communicate and motivate effectively.
A tendency to behave, contribute and interrelate with other in a particular way – when working in a
team.
o My results show that I am a Shaper (SH)
I challenge and drive the team forward to achieve its goals and objectives.
Shapers are dynamic and highly-motivated individuals with a lot of nervous energy and a great need
for achievement. They’re primarily interested in getting things done – as quickly as possible.
Shapers are best managed by a Co-ordinator who can channel their drive, or a Monitor Evaluator who
can help them to think before acting. As managers, Shapers work well when supported by an
Implementer (whose efficiency and task focus will be appreciated) or a Team worker, who can
smooth over any misunderstandings that might arise.
✔ Do...
Use a factual and goal-oriented approach. Talk in terms of what can be achieved and when the
deadline might be.
✖ Don’t...
Make personal attacks in arguments or allow yourself to get off-topic in discussions. Avoid ambiguity
wherever possible.
Question 2:
ANALYSIS:
o Core:
I joined the team when the project was on it’s early stages and immediately I had an issue with how
the project was being handled.
My understanding was that a Project lead should be identified so that they he/she can lead the team.
We needed to have a criteria and matrix that will be used to elect the Lead.
The above would eliminate people going to meetings to do their own things during with no
formalities in terms of work load delegation. We could not all agree on issues but there should be a
final stance which should be given by the leader.
o Structure:
The structure of this team is 4 Master Trainers from All the shops and 4 FPS coordinators from each
shop.
The Master Trainers will always lead because they had better benefits than the coordinators.
All members needed to be in the same level in position and with rate of pay because they all had the
same qualification and they were playing the same role.
o Culture:
The culture was all animals are equal but some more equal than others.
We all do the same thing but with pay we differ.
The norms are to only focus on your role and do your job even if you would know of something that
would help a fellow colleague to make their jobs easier.
Those that earned more have caused tension and there is no cohesiveness in any of team projects.
People will choose to be leads whenever the role suited them
This also causes trust issues that don’t get better because people keep repeating the same behaviour.
Everyone was always moody and by themselves with no team work.
o Pattern:
Every morning people will go to meetings with food and they would play games.
The junior members have grown increasingly quite because they know their views will not be taken
into consideration because of their roles within the company.
The seniors have become increasingly aggressive in tabling their suggestions because they feel there
is no leadership, they don’t respect the chairperson and their views.
The communication of the team has broken down and everyone feels the meetings were not important
and a waste of time.
o Performance:
The Content:
We started drafting minutes and reading them after the meeting with people signing on tasks that
needed to be performed.
Verbal:
We started communicating on delegating all that needed to be dome with timing on when we needed
to finish and submit tasks
Non-verbal
Roles were changed and everyone was at the same level and position which gave everyone equal
rights to perform.
Production:
We created a work environment where everyone was celebrated when they did right and corrected
when there was a need
Decisions:
We would vote on what needed to happen and object with resolutions on issues that we did not agree
on.
Output:
We became a team that was winning with passion knowing your role and contribution mattered.
2.2
I would make the two following g recommendations for the project team so that we are able to m
move forward.
Rules;
• Everything goes
• No submission should not be criticized
• Generate as many ideas as possible
• Build on one another’s ideas
SWOT Analysis: The team lists strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats
Potential- failure Analysis: To analyse potential failures or problems relating to the implementation of
the proposed plan.
Decision Trees : A tree will be drawn to assist the team in choosing the best alternative
Snow Ball : To categories ideas by pinning idea cards on the wall