Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/229005965
CITATIONS READS
0 111
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Gang-Ding Peng on 14 September 2015.
Creep strain ( µ ε)
400 800
300 600
200 400
Mechanical
100 200
Optical
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Fig. 3. Drying shrinkage of concrete prisms. Fig. 5. Creep of concrete cylinders after loading.
500 500
Optical measurement ( µ ε)
Optical measurement ( µ ε)
y = 0.7528x
y = 0.3762x
400 R2 = 0.9952 400
R2 = 0.9839
300 300
200 200
100 100
0 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Mechanical measurement (µε
µε)
µε Mechanical measurement (µε
µε)
µε
Fig. 4. Relationship between optical and mechanical Fig. 6. Relationship between optical and mechanical
measurements of drying shrinkage strain of concrete prisms. measurements of creep strain of concrete cylinders.
and the drying conditions of the ambient environment. same drying room, which were used to obtain the drying
The degree and rate of drying vary throughout the depth shrinkage strain. Mechanical measurement was obtained
of the prism. The portion of the prism, notably at the by using a demountable mechanical strain gauge
surface, that is exposed to the ambient environment (Demec), which has a resolution of 0.002 mm or 16.2
experienced the greatest and fastest amount of shrinkage. µε. Optical measurement was obtained from the
On the other hand, at the core of the prism, since the embedded FBG sensors, similar to the prior drying
water required a longer time to be transported to the shrinkage experiment.
surface via the pores, the shrinkage was smaller and Fig. 5 shows the creep strain of the concrete
slower than that at the surface. Although there was a cylinders obtained from optical and mechanical
difference in the shrinkage strain measured between the measurements. The first reading was taken immediately
two methods on the prism, the difference is small as after loading, at the age of 28 days from moulding. The
expected. The two measurements are more comparable creep strain was determined from the total strain taken
as measured along the axis of the prism, and their directly from the loaded cylinders, and subtracting the
shrinkage growth trends were remarkably similar. Fig. 4 instantaneous elastic strain and drying shrinkage strain
shows the relationship between the optical and taken from the companion unloaded cylinders. The creep
mechanical measurements of drying shrinkage strains. strain increased rapidly in the first week after loading,
They yielded a very high degree of correlation, and became more stable after 1 month. The difference in
indicating that both measurements agreed very well, with the creep strain between the optical and mechanical
the difference being only 100 µε. measurements was about 700 µε after 120 days of
loading, which is considered large. The high degree of
correlation between the optical and mechanical methods
5. CREEP can be seen in Fig. 6.
Total strain (µ ε)
loaded cylinder consists of both the creep and drying 1200
shrinkage strains. The drying shrinkage strain can be
800
separately measured from a companion unloaded
cylinder under the same environmental condition as the 400 Mechanical
loaded cylinder. The thermal strain can be discarded if Optical
the temperature is kept constant, which was the case in 0
our experiments. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Optical measurement ( µ ε)
respectively. The behaviour of the creep strain (including 1000 y = 0.5594x
the creep and drying shrinkage strain) is shown in the R2 = 0.9884
800
figure as subsequent data points after the onset of the
600
instantaneous elastic strain. Thus, the total strain curve
gives the complete history of the time-dependent 400