Brief Description : AFP Development Support and Security Project Proponent : AFP Category : Peace and Culture Project Location : Talayan Would the project be at any risk from environmental or human-made hazards? : No Are the project’s demands on the natural resources assured of being met for the life of the project? : No
Program Components :
Program Component Activities Location Beneficiaries Desired Output Responsible Person
AFP Development Support to Talayan MTF-ELAC, Local 4 meetings per LCE/POC Focal Support and Security AFP Security Council year Operations (Maintenanc e of AFP Camps and Checkpoints) Support to Talayan MTF-ELAC 4 meeting per LCE/POC Focal MTF-ELAC year (MTF-ELAC Meetings) Support to Talayan CCA Subsidized meal LCE Civilian allowance of 20 Active CCA Auxiliary (Procuremen t of Food supplies) Support to Talayan IDPs 100% IDPs will AFP/DRMMO IDPs due to be served combat operations (Relief Operations)
Support to AFP 1, 200, 000.00 IRA 2022-2026 Operations (Maintenance of AFP Camps and Checkpoints) Support to MTF-ELAC 1, 200, 000.00 (MTF-ELAC Meetings) Support to Civilian 3, 000, 000.00 Active Auxiliary (Procurement of Food supplies) Support to IDPs due to 3, 000, 000.00 combat operations (Relief Operations) Total Cost 8, 400, 000.00
Justification of the Project : To prevent armed conflict and/or insurgency.
Target Beneficiaries : MTF-ELAC
Target Outputs or Success Indicators : 0% Hostility
Objectives Desired Output / Success Indicators Means of verification
Outcome To minimize 4 Meetings Attendance sheet, arm conflict per year pictures, minutes by 70% at the end of 2026
Possible Risks or External Factors that Could Frustrate the Realization of the Project :
Expected Private Sector Response : Easy access to lgu transactions
Doing Aquaculture as a Business for Small- and Medium-Scale Farmers. Practical Training Manual. Module 2: The Economic Dimension of Commercial Aquaculture
Eugene and John Jilka v. Saline County, Kansas, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Committee, Its Review Committee, and United States of America, 330 F.2d 73, 10th Cir. (1964)