Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seminar
Outline ~n
~
A~B i\1 (?) I
7
A ·G'1Grosriem:cs.
TMroumt lnc.
c.R§sistivity Imaging :M.etfiodS .71:
Apparent Resistivity
2;r
K=--------
5
Geometric Factor
4n-
K=-------------------------------
N 6
........................
,~ . ~' tlJ otu~·:
8
·[
1-1 .,- .at . &2 96 110
0.0
•···········.J
8~9
2 .6
•••
••••• •••• •••• •••••••• ••
•• • •• • ••• •••• • •• • • ••
•
1
- ~I
,-
........
a a • • • • • • • • • a •• • • • • a . a
• • • • • • • •
• •• •• • •• • •••••• • •• •
• • • • • • • • • • • •
476
l6 i
102 ~- H6
7
•• Cia):
altwater: 0. 1 -
I -
I
100
• Fresh water: 10 - 100
• andstone:
lluvium: I - 1.000
•• Lime tone: I -
10 -
1.000
10.000 10
• Gravel: 100 - 10,000.
11
A B
.10 llQ
::
6
~ 8000
"'
;; I i
~
;;
a ~t-+t
l.l I
~ I I
100
I I I "10 10
10 100 Ohm-m
D<vlli (lll)
Sdtlunlbo2er .·\nil) .\8 ~ { Ill)
ltt~;tii Qn =3 Rl..IS -09~o
14
. _r:t
=-AG'1Ttldi'OII('('fl
1(]), 2(]), 3(]) and 4(]) Gt"f).•;dr,C'C.'S.Inc.
AGI Earthlmager 20
Resistivity and IP inversion software
--. -...-...--
~·
16
A 2 0 survey ca n be do ne:
17
''
73 67
g
£a. 146 22
"
0
219 075
29 1 0.26
Data counesy of Jason Green"'ood and Peter warzensk1 at the US Geolog1cal urvey m t Petersburg. Florida
19
~ :liS 889
~
§
i ~-~-~
\;
iii
:! lO ~8 1
~1 6 '0
20
21
?A.G'TMmnml
n
1(]), 2(]), 3(]) antf4(]) 1 i:ieosrientY'S, Inc
AGI Earthlmager 30
Resistivity Data Inversion Software
..~1.1- 1.-l :! ~
·-; .-: an ~
!9 , ..
Mt--."' l.oJlO•AppbU
:~e~aon ,_ o.S. R.MS • s.J"'- L2 • 1. 1
22
-o.oo·
·LlSI
z ·2 701
1066 y
-40j~
5.33 -- --
X 2.67 ~~- 99
~.samvny (ohm-m)
~111116'c:JII'u
ilJ:~~:'·JIIIi
~
23
24
25
.... - X
. -~
·I Jl
I
I
! j
z
! I
z
I. I
z
.I
I l I
I
I
·~·
' '
l..,
y \.
!
~ y
:, t
'
I
;
i
Condual..1tY Ch:m~t ICMI)
-600 -30.0 00 30 0 60.0
Why Inversion?
Meas ured
Data
Earth
Model
Measured
Data
Earth
Model
,___E_I_ectr_tc_C_u_r_re_n_tS_o_u_rce
_ __)] ! Fmrte Element Method
Data
Model Parameters
~··
'
JI.O ~0
,..
Oilrll4l
l .. ..
9J
61
Model Data
31
Inverse Problem
Inverse Problem -from Data to Model
~- -------------------------- _,
Electrode Location } li---o_a_m_pe<I_L_••_st_Sq_ua_res_---'
Reststtvtty DtstnbuliOn p(x. y z)
Model Parameters
!
l ..
JO
...
"., j ,.
..
.. 100
••
Data
f ....
1 "
Model 32
+
c
c
33
Modeling Mesh
Number of mesh divisions bt:twcen two electrodes = 2
0 15 30 60 90
00
2.5
S.3
SJ
11 .6
.s
~ 15.3
g dl
193
d2
'"
.o.
!S 6
I
Thickne of the lower layer (d2)
Thickne s incremental factor =
Thick ness of the upper layer (d I)
34
Median Depth
• Wenner array : 52% of a- pacing
• chlumberger: 19. 1% of AB spacing
• Gradient 19.1°oofAB spacing
• on-conventi onal: 19. 1% of the largest electrode pan
• Pole-pole: 60°o of AM eparation
• Dipole-Dipole: 14% - 25° o of the largest electrode span
• Pole-Dipole : 50°o - 60°o of M separation depending on AM/M
35
·'
~AG rAttmnmt
Modeling Mesh - Irregular -
~~_£:1'_ 1Grosricm-es. lnr.
• It is preferred but
NOT required to have
an equally-spaced
electrode layo ut.
• An irregular
electrode layout leads
to a distorted model
and a large numerical
modeling error.
s·.r ---------
. 20•- -ltJ''7C ---- __
B~~----------------~~~[~-~ --~-~
--··~·~040~0~0~0~0~0~0~0~0~0HO~O~O~O~O~O~ae~aa
\ ------------------------ -- A 1
B"• ------
A
• For a "true" infinity electrode (AB > 5 * . N), the infinity
electrode can be placed anywhere, either perpendicular or
parallel to the survey line.
• If the infinity electrode location does NOT satisfy AB > 5 *
AM , make sure the infinity electrode is installed in the shared
triangular area. Earth Imager will model the response of the
infinity electrode. 37
38
lr"'baa Seunos I
Forword Moderlo AesiStiV'It)llnvefSIOn )IP lnvets.on I Teua.n 1 CAP
~ofdoet.fNf!1MoRepe,t&ror•6
~ofdat.f1Yf!IMoRfa).Error •0
VA.~
PUIOer of ..n.ct ct.ta bdcM Min ~ • 0
DelnoooiYA<o ~of~trveAppRa:dltAII• 144
of-v.Mr tOtes of ~es -o
~
~
Mr>Appat,.. Res (ohm-ml Jv·DOilth ,.,.,... of reQnQII ddtl rernoYed • 0
~
~ofcl.cJk;Jtetreti'IO¥ed•O
Jl o.....otJonoiVe~ucal-
Me. Appal ... A (ohm-ml 1Pooirve Upward :iJ
Jmm :::J ~ofdBU~fi.goedfotranovM•lli
(25.3"'of92Ddlltlltx:ll'tsll0be~
"'" Eloettode Spaang (ml
Me. Rec,xocai Em~~ !"I
X [001':::J Z [001':::J
Js iJ
O"'ance Scoie Fac<ot
r R"""veNogotrveAI>OAes
Jl 0
r KeepAI r A~Spokea
I
Deld u ... Settrogs OK Cancel
39
Reciprocals
Original
I\ I
Reciprocal I
Reciprocal2
\I
000 oo.. jo
.... ..... •:o••••....•
&o to no .:oo
t&o 110
II ! ··::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::··
! ,.,
,,. ........
··=·~·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:··
Demo data: reciprocals.stg
"' 40
Rectprocal mea urement errors are a rigorous mea ure or data qu ali ty and hardware integrity.
41
Starting Model
• The default starting model is a homogeneous half space with a resistivity value
equal to the average of all apparent resistivity data .
• User options:
~ Start from raw data pseudosection in 20
~ Start from a homogenous half space of any resistivity value.
~ Input an a-priori model manually from the menu Settings I Input Resistivity
A-Priori Model.
~ Read a water conductivity file for CRP data inversion to constrain the water
layer.
,...
St.amgModel
_
.... ...
D~Factcr
,.... - •• ::J
Ito ::J R~Ohfrl.ln
I ::J
42
I ~J1
'l 216 186 J~l "0 >Ol !1'2 ... Obm-m
2000
1'03 9>6
I liB
"'
'"'9 lll
lUI 100
::=AG'TMmnmt
:1"1;1.Gcosdenres,/nc
Stop Criteria of Inversion
• Minimum Error Reduction . RMS error is often reduced by more than 50%
for the first few iterations. Then error reduction slows down at the later
iterations. If there is no apparent RMS error reduction , say the error reduction
is less than 5% , the inversion should stop. Settings
Stop Crlena
po ~
r L2Norm
r UseR~Er
r ~=r:!~
44
41
Starting Model
• The default starting model is a homogeneous half space with a resistivity value
equal to the average of all apparent resistivity data.
• U er options:
~ Start from raw data pseudosection in 20
~ Start from a homogenous half space of any resistivity value.
~ Input an a-priori model manually from the menu Settings I Input Re istivity
A-Priori Model.
~ Read a water conductivity file for CRP data inversion to constrain the water
layer.
;..
'"'
...£j(l
''" »--~Ted~ H111D
$I~ Modal ~
~fo'odfl~~
~~Set. .
....
• .......,:.e~
1.......... ::::J
R~OivrH!t
fpr-t;t~
a.s.· . .
,.
I OJ
42
• RMS Error(%). RMS would depend on the noise level in the data. For a
clean data set, 3% RMS error would be an acceptable objective.
\ ( d;·a/c- d~"""·' J2
L dmem
RMS = ~ I I I X I 00%
Advanced Features
46
47
Survey (J)esign
0 Electrode spacing
0 Depth of investigation
0 !ide-along vs roll-along
0 3D electrode layout
0 Electrode geometry file (geo)
0 Command file (cmd)
0 Array types
0 ignal strength vs. noi e level
0 Smooth model effect
"
00
1
,.
1,1 I '
10
~
13
~
16 19
I
I I
22 25
li
28 Otwnm
1000
"83
I 200
I[ 116
I I
I
~ 1:)3
I 100
I
193 I 20
231
!
I.,......,..._ ~omd AellsaMty • 100 ()tm.m
10
49
Slide-along : The entire cable slides forward. Subsections Band Care sampled with the same
command file as that of Subsection A.
Disadvantage Zones 1 & 2 are sampled twice unnecessanly Zones 3 and 4 are missing a large number
of data points. A slide-along survey 1s slow with compromised model resolution at the bottom.
Roll-along: Part of the cable(<= 25% ) is rolled over. Subsections Band Care sampled
with an automatically reduced command file of Subsection A.
Advantages. No duplicate measurements, fewer missmg data po1nts. A roll-along survey is faster than a
slide-along survey and has a better model resolution at the bottom of the section.
51
In the roll-along mode, AGI Super ting automatically kips the data points al ready samp led.
Slide-along vs Roll-along
.·.·.·.·.·
........ .·.·.·. .
"'
. . .....
.... . .·.·.· ....·.
·.•.·
... ..... ...... ..·.··.· ·...· ·.·.·.·.· .
)Ill- X
• Roll-along in this direction
.. 1
. .
28 ·29 66 ·1 .. -28 Layout out even number of
.... lines of cables
53
• --<: • e -<:- e
• • • •
An ideal 3D layout • • • •
is a square grid of
electrodes.
• • • •
• • • •
--r-•
a
•
_L . •- <
j.-2a--j
Xiunjin J ~mg mul Alt1b l..t~guumwm , ( 'ompc~rnon of]/) und Jj) n!\1\11\'tty mwgmj! methotA pn!.\t!nled at the SAC iii/~
-tpnl J t.i, 2006, Sttullh!, JU 55
..
14 . 26. 14. o. 12. 11, o.
o.
15, 28, 15, o. 10
.....
16, 2 13, 0, 12, 0,
16, 30,
17. 4. 14. 0, 13, 0,
17. 32.
18, 34. 18 . . 15. 2, 13. 0,
19. 36. 19, 16, 2, 12. 0,
20, 38, 20, 10 17. 2. 11, o.
21, 40, 21, 8, 18. 2. 10, 0,
22, 42. 22, 8, 19, 2. 9, o.
23, 44. 23, 8, 20, 2. 8. 0,
24, 46, 24. 8,
25, 48, 25, 8,
26, so. 26. 8,
27. 52. 27. 8, • Z is negative below the ground surface
28. 54. 28. 8.
29, 8,
• A string can be either a borehole or a surface line
29, 56,
30, 58, 30, 8, 10 57
.t:,
I :... Dlpo!Mipolo 3000
..
_... 2000
0
400 ... ... • .. 1500
~~--~ ~---.~
.t: ... 1000
600
Dipole-Dipole array
gives the best
~ ...,___
: khlurnbqer "" 2!50 resolution
. . .-. .
clolodloobgolh""''!hlho_ l _botlomalh- drltedandgroullld. TMinCif'IWy~565 il •t.::ll.nmMwdh
--~10,1W8 ~COYOondh-•11201ooOOYty. Tho1wo_..
60
61
Array Types
Reference
• tum mer. P.. Maurer. II., and Green. A. G., 2004. Experimental design: Electrical resistivitydata
set that provide optimum sub urface information, Geophysics. vol. 69, 120-139. Th1s paper
concluded that mixed non-standard dipole-dipole array and grad1ent array has the best resollllion.
• Gharibi M. and Bentley L.R.. 2005, Resolution of3-D electrical resistivity imaging from
inversions of2-D orthogonal lines, Joumal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysic , Vol. I0
No. 4, 339-349. This paper concluded that "3D electrical resistivity 1maging usmg sets of orthogonal of
2-D survey lines provides an efficient and cost effective tool for site characterization ... •
• Zhou, B., and Greenhalph, .A.. Cro -hole resistivity tomography using different electrode
configurations, Geophysical Pro pectin g. 2000, 48, 887-912. This paper concluded that the bipole-
bipole array 1s an ideal array for cross borehole resistivity tomography.
• Wilkinson et al. . 2006. Optimization of array configuration and panel combinations for the
detection and imaging of abandoned mine haft using 3D cross-hole electrical resistivity
tomography, Journal of Environ. and Eng. Geophysics (JEEG). V II , No 3, 213- 221.
• Yang, X. and Lagmanson, M., 2006, Comparison of2D and 3D electrical resi tivity imaging
method , the proceedings of the SAGEEP2006, Seattle, WA. Tins paper concluded that 3D
mversion ofcombmed 2D data sets collected along closely-spaced paral/e//mes prowdes
acceptable 3D resolution .
• )qui t, J. and Roth. M.. 2005, Improved 3D pole-dipole resistivity surveys using radial
measuremem pair , Geophysical Research Letter , Vol 32, L21416.
62
1000
• A model of I00 Ohm-m
200
background .
100 • A I 000 Ohm-m
20 resistive object
10 • I OOhm-m
cond uctive object.
63
(Data CIJrocessing
Copynght C by Advanced Geosciences Inc All rights res9Mid. Thts publication, or parts thereof. may not be refXDduced ir1 any fofm
WTfhout 'Wriffen permissiOn of Advanced GeosCiences. Inc_ 64
• Read Data
• Start Inversion
65
67
This is a 3D sample Universal Resistivity Data File for testing purpose only.
Top two lines are comments and the third line defines the length unit.
Unit: meters
:Geometry
;ID, X, Y, Z
Open Un•vrl"kkl RemliYIIY Dele f •I• [? ] ~
1' 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
..:J (i;] 0' .
2, 0.00, 1.00, 0.00
3, 0.00, 2.00, 0.00
4, 0.00, 3.00, 0.00
5, 0.00, 4.00, 0.00
6, 0.00, 5.00, 0.00
7, 1.00, 5.00, 0.00
8, 1.00, 4.00, 0.00
:Measurements
;A , B, M, N, V/l(ohm), l(mA), Error(%), Chargeability(mVN)
1, 2, 3, 4, -1.0e-01
1, 2, 4, 5, -9.0e-02
1, 2, 5, 6, -7.5e-02
1, 2, 7, 8, 8.0e-02 Earthlmager also processes data in a OAT format
69
• When a raw data file , e.g., StingCave1 .stg , is read into Earthlmager, a
folder StingCave1 is created if it does not exist and a new trial subfolder is
also created . The current trial number would be always the largest.
• A clean dataset (STG), inversion settings file (IN I) and inversion output file
(OUT) are saved in the current trial folder.
• The automatic file saving feature is on by default, but it can be disabled for
the purpose of learning and program testing .
• The current trial folder may be accessed from a tool button on Earth Imager.
Troal
LJ ~arthiJna9er20\demo\cave\trial~ Go
"
~ C:\MyPro]ects\Cave Detectoo X Name Size
X Name cave_trial4.inl 1 KB
StJngCavel ~cave_tnal4.out 210 KB
5tJnQ(ave2 cave_trl.ol4.stQ 2SKB
l:!!)stnq<:avel.sto [!)cave_trlal4 _InvRes~ .dat 16KB
l:!!) stnqCave2.sto it) cave_trial4_lnvRes6.dat 16KB
tria/2 lnvertedRes4.bmp 1,102 KB
troal3 ) )
stnqCave2
1.33 MB My Computer
trial!
tria/2
70
71
;:
•luur,.hon
.v =~==-~=
~~~~.-. ... ,.. . .,....st
....... 111.._.,_.,_,,./1 •I
,. ........,.. ...,
~fti<Mt._._..._.I!Jrw .. .
..................
~o~.-.-"-.._.DI"'' -o
.....
........ _...............
,____......,..._.
~fll.-o,W .... fll~-·
~,
.................
~
.. ., .......... .
............................
, ... ,. . . ... . .
.. egative apparent risis_t.iyjt;
'"
'w.altt r t'ktt oCI11tHttd ( IIITMII (MA. )
..· ~~i~
.. 0
.. ......
"::~" .....................................
................................ ... ............................
. . ...... ...............•
10- 15 ··:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:-::: · 1 k-Oh
k-Ohm ··::::::::::::::::··
72
73
74
75
Processing Steps:
• Read Data
• Choose default surface settings
• Read Terrain File
• Start Inversion
Survey Tips:
76
; Terrain File
unit=Meters
2
0 5 15 20 25 ; Case 2: Tape measure
;X, Elevation
Case 1 Horizontal distance
0, 240.95
3, 241 .18
5 10 35 6, 241 .42
~
9, 241.65
20 25 45 50 12, 242.44
15, 243.24
Terrain Correction
76
19
",.
____
n.....-c.~
w-..l'!fle-·-~
, ........
-.eM.._ .......,...,......,.....
~-.:. "'
II!
19
II
.........
--·
....._,..,_ f . . . . . . . . ~~
-..-..~-
"
_._
80
Rf'laf'h f' 1\todt l S f'n drhi~ Snrion Rthrivt 1\todtl Stnsithi ry Sf'<'fion
10
. ,. ,,
llEoOI
.! )J
,,....,
111!.01
! no
'"
171
Jll
• The model blocks near electrodes
have the highest resolution . '"
• Cross borehole resistivity imaging has ltet~•O
'" 00
RMJ•JISO~
OJ 130
MormU::uJU•7411S9jj
a better resolution at the depth.
j4U)4 6J.E..03 74Ull 16£..01 IJE.oOI
R•IUtvt Snuda"f'll.J
81
2D ERT Setup
Surface electrodes
/ • • •
Borehole 1 Borehole 2 -
. ----------------------- _ . -+ Aspect Ratio, 0 / . should be
greater than 1.5.
Borehole -+ For efficient mode ling and
good re olu tion. electrode in
Electrodes- -
.. -------- --- --- -- ----- ---
------------------------
different boreholes shou ld be
aligned at the same depth as close
as po ible .
-+ urface electrodes are not
•
·---- --- ---- ------- --- ---
req ui red but may be used to
improve near- urface resolu ti on.
82
----·
-----·
----- ..
83
Borehole Arrays
n n n n
Same Stnng
A- M
Pole-Pole
Cross Stnng
N
Same String
AB - MN
Dipole-
Dipole
Cross Stnng
nn n n
Same String
A - MN
Pole-Dipole
A
Cross Stnng
~
Same String
AM - BN
Bipole-
Bipole
Cross Stnng
Reference:
• Z hou. B , and GreenhaJ ph. SA Cross-hole re ismi ty tomography usmg d1fterent electrode confi guration •
Geophysical Prospecung. 2000. 48 887-912
• Wii ~Jnson et al . :!.006, Opumization of array configurations and panel combinataon for the detecti on and amag1ng of
abandoned mme hafts using 30 cross-hole electrical resisuvaty tomography. Journal of Environ and Eng Geophy ic
(JEEG). VII. oJ 213 221 84
..
ltfllWl..~t · l !.n~
.. .........
... ..
1..-nriM ..ct I Rl lbw lbt• ' n lttr .....
.... ..
oforn~liOO
........
............······
u
.. .. ..... • NegativeAppRes
.. i. . ... ....
. .....
.....
..
• mall ignal from
- ............................
...•....•.
the dipole-dipole array
• Bad electrode
lnfonnntlon f7(1
J,.J ::::=-~= ::
i
..
IOO :
,...,.cldictllbeow,_,~.
,.,._cldolc.below*"Yft •29
~r:tfd.ttecm:r"'-x~tError-6
JO
..
I'Vrlberoff'lt'glllve:~d&ta•l)7
l .,. : ,..._of~.._of~·O
-, : ~of~~-o
"" 85
86
Processing Steps:
Case 3- Mixed land and underwater
• Read Data Water Segment #1
• Choose default surface settings
for freshwater or conductive earth
settings for saltwater.
• Read an underwater terrain file.
• Start In version
87
Data for a lard to sea resistMty lmagong profile was oquued USK1!l the
was processed usi1g
fJt:;l SUperStrng R8/1P rElSIStiVity II11CQing system. Data
rhe Eanhlmoger software 1he eleCtrodes crt sea were s~rrp~y placed crt the
baHom. no other connecflon was needed 1he Eorfhlmoger soltwore provided
the terraon correcflon bath under and above wo1er
BeaverHoles.stg
00
10 .. .. .. ., "'' 116 ot.o-·
600
Ill
"'
16 <
Data counesy of Da\e Welch. Net I 0 Anderson & \ssociates. acramemo, California 89
GPS
90
:.·
~
.,
~ Depth and
.
- .
'
t
t
rem perature
. I
~fl 4G£~'m"'"
Earthlmager 2D CRP Module (.iiYJ#rll't"'f'&.blt"
-~-
~ ~~~ I
The CRP mapping of the coastal areas of Anguilla British West Indies (BWI), were used
to evaluate and thicknes over the lime tone to determine the fea ibility of:
I) constructing horizontal beach wells for salt water su pply intake
2) map the depth to limestone and the physical characteristics of the limestone to aid in
the design of storm water drainage wells
3) to provide the bathymetry and ea bottom sedi ment distribution as part of our
analysis of beach erosion.
00
140 16
§;
5 211 073
d 411 034
561 016
Inversion result with Eanhlmager 2D CRP module. The horizontal coordi nates can be
ei ther linear di tance or Lat/Long or UTM.
93
Data courtesy of Ocean Earth Technolog1es. Palm Harbor. Florida http 1/'h\\W snettles com,
95
100
! "'
! I~J
"'
,...
...
~
97
i
1
98
Xianjin Yang, 1999, Stochastic Inversion of JD ERT Data, PlrD tlresis, tire University ofA rizona 99
-80 -40 0 40 80
Percent Difference
of Conductivity.
Infiltration tarted on
Day68 Day 133 3/1 1/ 1999 (Day 0)
Xia njin Yang, 1999, Stocltastic Inversion of JD ERT Data, PltD tlresis, tire University ofA rizona 100
Minford
UpperGalia
Sunbury
Berea
Sandstone
Cross-borehole
Electrical Resisttvity
-100 -50 0 50 100 Tomography (ERT)
Perce nt C ha nge(%) in Co nductivity
team enhanced remed18llon at Ponsmouth Gaseous DifTu!ion Plant "'as funded by US DOE and conducted by
Steam Tech Environmental Sel"\-tc~ under subcontract to Bechtel Jacobs Co LLC
f_,n/Jrecq••e. D.J.. and )~mg. X. ZOO/, /Jifferenu lm·~nion of£RT /)(lftl: 11 Fa+;t/m·enion ~Heth otlfor J-n in Situ
,\lonitoring. Journal of Em·ironmenwl and Engineering (,~,!IJph;•sic'i (J££G), J0/6, luue 1, pp. SJ-89. 101
0~~
~~~~
30 . .
60
""'
90
120
ft Plane K
Steam enhanced remedtatton at Visaha Pole Yard was funded by Southem Califomia Edison and conducted
102
parttally by Steam Tech En\lrOtunental ervtce
G
,",.,
'-
Ja. l- 1- F
~~~
-I- E El4
~ - I I
I' I I
EIJ 1-
014 ;
I ...._ El5 I
I I 1- Dl3 FIJ r
-I- h 815- .:::,. ~D?
1"-1
FI.J k- 1-
-I-
I D """
-h ~14
y ! I
Dl\ r-- F15 -I-
Dl2
A and tank at Oregon Graduate -1 BIJ-,V Cl5 'lo
Dll
Institute:, Beaverton. Oregon. The /1 I I
VI Cl4 1- ~ r-t c 1-1-
funding was provided by American v
Petroleum Institute:. 8 12 17 22 27
,' e ERT \\ell
A • ERT surface electrode
}tmg X. eta/. .!00 I ..A..!mutormj!, ofanln-SIItr Atr .\f'lttl'glll}! J:.xpertmem ( \mg 1~"/ec: tm:a/ Re...niiH~\ frmmgraph•~ the
Pnx;ttedmg\ C?{SA(i/:JJ~ fktl\'er, ("o/oraJo. 103
Ytmg X. et ul, 20(J/, .\lomtormg ojun /n-Suu Atr ~\iXtf"!(lll$l F.xJNrtmem u,mg Ue,·tru:al Re.\1\IH't~r /(nnOFlraphy, the 104
Pnx:eedmg\ ofSA<iFI:.P. lkm·er. Colorado.
oisy
Data
Air displaces the water
in the saturated sand
tank. Air does not
conduct electricity at
all. Resistivity changes
depend on the air
saturation.
105
0 2 3 4 Sm
}img Y. t!l lll, 2001, Almuwrm!( of au hlw5ilfll A1r .\jx1rgmf,: J..xpermu!lll ( '""K /~le<:tnt¥.11 RI!J>/\11\'fl}' /()mograplu: the
Pmt't'(.>Jmg\ (~fSACii~LI~ !Jem·er. ('o/orackJ 106
Apparent chargeability:
m =-
vs
a Vp
GI SuperSting
pparent chargeability in
seconds by SuperSting:
TX off
m,
f Vsdt
I
= --'--'---
pparent chargeability
in sLx windows
VP 107
• Read Data
• Change ettings
• tart Inversion
• Click and hold the left mouse button to rotate the image
• Click and hold the right mouse button to zoom in and out
• Click and hold the middle mou e button (wheel) to move
(translate) the image around.
110
......
..
..
''"
..,..
- ..,..
-
0.00
2.67
5 33
X
111
112
3D Survey Planner
-.
·~ ft1tt1 X
.
... '
115
~A·G'TMIXIIIreri
~n :J.Gro.,-;pt}N!S, fllc.
Combine Parallel 2D Lines for 3D Inversion
~ ....., .. 1 ~ 116
Abo.t Earthlmaoet ZD
• Your user name and password can be found from the Earth Imager
menu Help I Earth Imager User Group.
• Earth Imager User Group web link:
http://www.agi usa.com/fi les/eicust/earth imageruser.shtm I
117
~ ~ o-1 I I
~lc:Jioi:%1Eif:
120