UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR

INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

LOGBOOK ASSESSMENT

Student Name : __________________________________________________

Student ID No. : __________________________________________________

Company Name : __________________________________________________

(place of INTRA)

Evaluator Name : __________________________________________________

Evaluator ID No. : __________________________________________________

………………………………………… …………………….
University Supervisor’s Signature Date

LOGBOOK ASSESSMENT Page 1of 8

Effective Date: January 2014
 UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

W* SCORE
GRADING

EVALUATION CRITERIA
Good Average Poor
(4-5) (3) (1-2)

A) Task Comprehensive
Good explanation Poor explanation
(CLO1) explanation of 1
of task. of task.
task.

B) Activities / Work Develop and Develop and Develop and

Produced organize work organize work organize work
process well and process process 4
(CLO1)
creatively satisfactorily. unsatisfactorily.

C) Comment / Conclusion Appropriate

Fair conclusions / Poor conclusions /
(CLO4) conclusions / 3
recommendation. recommendation.
recommendation

D) Verification Minimum of 14 More than 8 Less than 8

(CLO2) signatures signatures signatures 2

TOTAL SCORE

*W - Weightage

LOGBOOK ASSESSMENT Page 2of 8

Effective Date: January 2014
 UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

REPORT ASSESSMENT

Student Name : __________________________________________________

Student ID No. : __________________________________________________

Company Name : __________________________________________________

(place of INTRA)

Evaluator Name : __________________________________________________

Evaluator ID No. : __________________________________________________

………………………………………… …………………….
University Supervisor’s Signature Date

LOGBOOK ASSESSMENT Page 3of 8

Effective Date: January 2014
 UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

GRADING *W SCORE
EVALUATION
CRITERIA
Good Average Poor
(4-5) (3) (1-2)

A) Format & Informative Inadequate No summary; No 3

Organization summary; table summary; table table of contents; No
of contents in of contents not in page numbering;
o Students abide by logical sequence; sequence; page unsuitable sub-titles.
the format given page numbering; numbering;
o Report is suitable sub- acceptable sub-
effectively titles. titles.
organized
o Title page
o Abstract
o Acknowledgement
o Table of Content
o List of Figures
o List of Tables
o References &
Appendices

(CLO4)

B) Company Main ideas are Main ideas are No main idea 2

Information clearly presented; presented to presented; Ideas are
Ideas are some extent; presented in an
o Location of the presented in an Ideas are not order that distracts
company interesting presented in an from clear
o Company’s manner; Ideas are order that adds communication;
organization chart supported by clarity; Some Ideas are not
o Nature of information and ideas are supported by
company’s logic. supported by information and are
business/activities information and illogical.
o Company’s logic.
products/ services

(CLO4)

LOGBOOK ASSESSMENT Page 4of 8

Effective Date: January 2014
 UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

C) Technical Section Main ideas are Main ideas are No main idea
clearly presented; presented to presented; Ideas are
(CLO1) Ideas are some extent; presented in an
presented in an Ideas are not order that distracts
Objective of the interesting presented in an from clear 1
project / training manner; Ideas are order that adds communication;
supported by clarity; Some Ideas are not
Schedule of the information and ideas are supported by 1
project/training logic; supported by information and are
(eg. Gantt Chart) Appropriate information and illogical;
conclusions are logic; Inappropriate
Description of the based upon Conclusions do conclusions are 3
project/training evidence not follow from presented.
presented. ideas presented.
Explanation on 3
trainee’s involvement
in the project/training

Technical 2
documentation such as
drawing, diagram,
flowchart and
programming

D) Language / writing / Generally error Sentence Errors in sentence 2

convention / vocabulary. free in regards to structure, structure,
sentence punctuation, punctuation,
structure, capitalization, capitalization,
punctuation, spelling, and spelling, and
capitalization, standard usage standard usage
spelling, and errors are impair readability.
(CLO4) standard usage. noticeable, but
do not seriously
impair
readability.

E) Conclusion / Appropriate Conclusions / Inappropriate 3

Recommendation conclusions / recommendation conclusions /
recommendation do not follow recommendation are
are based upon from ideas presented.
evidence presented.
(CLO1) presented.

TOTAL SCORE

*W - Weightage

LOGBOOK ASSESSMENT Page 5of 8

Effective Date: January 2014
 UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT

Student Name : __________________________________________________

Student ID No. : __________________________________________________

Company Name : __________________________________________________

(place of INTRA)

Evaluator Name : __________________________________________________

Evaluator ID No. : __________________________________________________

………………………………………… …………………….
University Supervisor Signature Date

LOGBOOK ASSESSMENT Page 6of 8

Effective Date: January 2014
 UNIVERSITI KUALA LUMPUR
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

Grading Scales: 1=Very poor 2= Poor 3=Satisfactory 4=Good 5=Excellent

GRADE AWARDED
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
(Kindly Circle)
A) PROFESIONALISM
o Dress professionally
o Speak with enthusiasm 1 2 3 4 5
o Punctual
o Good time management
STAGE SKILLS (CLO4)

B) VOCAL
o Loud enough to be heard
o Words are pronounced clearly 1 2 3 4 5
o Usage of fillers are minimized
o Uses a variety of tone
C) DELIVERY
o Maintain eye contact
o Effective gestures 1 2 3 4 5
o Maintain good posture
o Handle visual aid effectively
SCORE /15
A) LANGUAGE
LANGUAGE (CLO4)

o Use English throughout the Presentation 1 2 3 4 5

o Language used is appropriate
B) VOCABULARY
o Technical terms and abbreviation are clearly defined 1 2 3 4 5
o Word choice is relevant

SCORE /10
A) COMPANY BACKGROUND
Able to explain
o Nature of company business/activities 1 2 3 4 5
o Company structure 1 2 3 4 5
o Company products/ services 1 2 3 4 5
B) PROJECT/TRAINING DESCRIPTION
CONTENT (CLO1)

Able to explain
o Objective of project/training 1 2 3 4 5
o Trainee placement in the organization 1 2 3 4 5
o Schedule of project/training (eg. Gantt Chart) 1 2 3 4 5
o Involvement in the project/training 1 2 3 4 5
C) TECHNICAL SECTION
Student is
o Fluent on the topic/ technical areas discussed 1 2 3 4 5
o Able to clarify technical terms used during training 1 2 3 4 5
o Able to clarify technical process they are involved in 1 2 3 4 5
o Able to give constructive or productive inputs to the training or project 1 2 3 4 5
o Able to explain problem faced 1 2 3 4 5
o Able to provide solution to problem faced 1 2 3 4 5
o Able to provide explanation/justification when asked 1 2 3 4 5
o Confident in answering questions 1 2 3 4 5
SCORE /75
TOTAL SCORE /100

LOGBOOK ASSESSMENT Page 7of 8

Effective Date: January 2014