Professional Documents
Culture Documents
General:
• Our work has been performed in accordance with the terms of our engagement as part of the signed Engagement Letter ('EL'), and comprises of this presentation and any oral
explanations given during the presentation of our findings as part of our deliverable
• This presentation necessarily represents only part of the information which we considered in carrying out our work, being that which we considered to be most relevant to our
understanding of your needs, in the light of this engagement.
• The information in this presentation will have been supplemented by matters arising from any oral presentation by us, and should be considered in the light of this additional
information. If you require any further information or explanations of our underlying work, you should contact us
• The information in this presentation is confidential and contains proprietary information of Ernst & Young Restructuring LLP. It should not be provided to anyone other than our client
without our written consent.
• Anyone who receives a copy of this presentation other than in the context of our oral presentation of its contents should note the above points. Under no circumstances shall we have
or accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any party other than our client in respect of the information contained in this document.
• The report does not constitute any legal opinion or advice from our side. We make no representation relating to matters of a legal nature, including, without limitation, matters of title
or ownership, legal description, encumbrances, liens, priority, easements and/or land use restrictions, the validity or enforceability of legal documents, present or future national or
local legislation, regulation, ordinance or the like, or legal or equitable defence.
• No person on the Ernst & Young team has any responsibility for making any management decisions, this responsibility remains solely remains with you and your management
• Our recommendations are based on our experience and are our best estimates, any timescales indicated in the report are dependent on the actions, skill base and support provided
• Our report is based upon facts as we know them, estimates, assumptions and other information developed from our research of the market, knowledge of the industry, and meetings
with the Industry experts within EY, during which EY was provided with certain information. The scope did not include auditing the information provided to us by the Client, Company or
market representatives. We make no assurances as to the completeness, integrity, validity or authenticity of the information provided to us. Accordingly, reliance on the financial and
operational information contained in this report should be limited to a general understanding of the market
• Estimates are based upon general economic conditions as they existed on the date of the analysis and recommendation and do not include an estimate of the potential of any sudden or
sharp rise or decline in general economic conditions. Events or transactions that may occur subsequent to the effective date of this report have not been considered Consequently, EY
does not represent that any estimate included in this report will be achieved. In addition, actual results achieved may vary materially from those presented
• There will usually be a difference between estimated and actual results, because events and circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and those differences may be material.
We take no responsibility for the achievement of projected results. If you require any further information or explanations, please do not hesitate to contact us
• As communicated to you, we have restricted our work to the specific; ‘scope of work’ referred to in our engagement agreement. It is our understanding that the specific ‘scope of work’
is sufficient for your purposes. We make no representation regarding the sufficiency of these procedures for your purposes
• We have not examined the implication of any business decisions that the Company is currently contemplating as a go forward approach
• We have not independently validated the information provided to us with the actual records maintained by any regulatory authorities or any other external source.
• Transactions and events which are not recorded and which are not disclosed to us may not have been identified in our work.
• As part of both primary and secondary research, we have taken Industry expertise and opinions of people who we believe would have a broad expertise in specific areas considered
within this report. These opinions have not been factually verified by us. These discussions have been conducted in complete confidence on a ‘no-name’ basis without disclosing the
nature or objective of our study.
• As part of secondary research we have taken the help of multiple publicly available information which we considered relevant. However, we have not factually verified the source for
those documents.
• The scope of our work did not involve our performing any audit tests or procedures for the purpose of performing any fraud investigation or any kind of statutory reporting relating to
any fraud noticed or reported during the year for any of the competitors referred to or benchmarked against as part of our report
• The report was prepared solely for [the purpose of client’s internal management analysis, and addressed issues specific to client] [client’s internal use]. The report was not prepared in
anticipation of being provided to third parties, and in carrying out its work and preparing the report, EY worked solely on the client’s instructions and for the client’s purposes, and did
not have the interest of anyone other than the client in its contemplation. Accordingly, EY would not have addressed issues of relevance to you or any other third party.
• EY, including its affiliates, partners, employees, agents, and subcontractors, accepts no responsibility and shall have no liability or duty of care in contract, tort or otherwise to you or
any other third party in relation to the contents of the report.
Page 2
DRAFT
Table of Contents
Contents Page No
Executive summary 5
Annexures 61
Page 3
DRAFT
Abbreviations
Page 4
Executive Summary
DRAFT
Executive Summary
Performance for PP in Sept - Oct’ 19 Performance for Auto in Sep’ 19 Overall outlook for Nov’ 19
► Collections and sales have observed ► Inspite of a drop in product sales ► Focus on fulfiment of orders for
significant impact on account of high across OEMs, the ‘Auto’ BU was able to critical contracts for PPI (FRP – Shell
employee attrition in Sept - Oct 2019. garner INR 45 Cr. Of revenue on the India; SMC – Cummins) to secure
► Significant inventory build-up back of INR 12 Cr.of tooling sales capacity utilization
observed during Oct-19 (~20% lag in ► Plant at Hosur has been ► Product sales acros OEMs for ‘Auto’ in
sales vs. production during Oct-19 for operationalized with no additional September is expected to be in the
Roto / Blow moulding products) CAPEX – to cater to dispatches for range of INR 39-40 Cr. basis current
► Dispatches facing a lag on account of TVS, KIA and Hyundai in Karnataka run rate
pricing shifting to ex-works basis ► The Chennai II & Hosur unit have ► On account of major changes in
► Key distributrors for WST continue to outperformed in Sep’ 19 over the last corporate tax rates there is potential
remain impacted (~70% reduction in 18 months on the back of orders of latent demand picking up in auto
monthly avg sale); 74 distributors out mainly from KIA sector if benefits are passed to the
of 168 yielding negligible business consumer
► Outflow towards raw materials, stores ► Budget preparation and payments in ► Re-activate key distributors for WST
and consumables during reporting line with budgetary allocations and ► Control rising overdue payable
period stood at INR 13 Cr. i.e. 38% of have helped streamline procurement position through faster recovery of
total payments; significantly up from process. Payments related to material overdue receivables
22% of total payments earlier procurement and production have
been prioritized over fixed overheads ► Continue strict cash discipline and
► Outflows towards monthly fixed costs incorporate overhead reduction
continue to remain in check at INR ► Collections in the period 24th July – wherever possible
8.85 Cr during the reporting period. 15th October have been INR 141.10 Cr
► Prepare 13 week rolling cashflows in
► Yes Bank and Axis Bank continue to ► 75% of total payments have been line with current weekly budgets
adjust amounts towards overdues allocated towards production in
current period
80
Q1 FY20 – INR 135 Cr Q2 FY20 – INR 74 Cr
70 31
H1 FY20 – INR 209 Cr
Amounts in INR Cr.
40
30 9
53 9
45 13
20 43
25 3
10 18 22
13 INR 16 Cr.
13
- -5
-10
FY19 avg Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19
PPC PPI Projected
Plant wise revenue breakup – Oct ‘19 Product wise revenue breakup – Oct ‘19 Sales vs. Production (MT) – Oct ‘19
492
3% Roto 400
10% 5%
Kalol WST 129
9% BMC 104
Namakkal 11% 35% SMC
91
Uluberia Roto SMC 15
Nalagarh INR 16 Cr. PS/FMD 15% INR 16 Cr. PS 37
60
Butibori FRP
19
Kolhapur 26% Others 68% FRP 22
Guwahati 17% CSP
- 100 200 300 400 500
Production (MT) Sales (MT)
Note: Other Roto products primarily consists of environmental products, bio-gas systems, pallets, ice boxes and industrial containers.
Oct-19 revenues are until 21Oct2019
Page 11
DRAFT
Water Storage Tanks – Critical distributors need to be revived,
(impacted by ~70% during YTD FY20)
Critical Distributor Analysis Dispatches vs. opening order book as on 1Oct2019
Amounts in INR Cr. Values in Units
Plant wise revenue contribution Product wise revenue contribution Product wise price trends (INR / Ltr)*
1% 8.0
Uluberia 1% 11%
7.3
13%
Namakkal 28% 7.0 6.4
13% 1% 12% 7.1
Nalagarh WSPR
34% 39% 6.0
Butibori 11% 22%
13% CCWS 21% 43% 6.0
Oct’19 Oct’19 5.0
Kalol INR 11 Cr WSBM INR 11 Cr 4.2 4.0
Guwahati 15% 4.0
WSCC 3.9
24% 3.7
Kolhapur 18% 24%
3.0
28% WSPR CCWS WSBM WSCC
H1 FY20 H1 FY20 28%
INR 153 Cr INR 153 Cr Oct-19 H1 FY20 Avg
(*) Average prices across product categories have dipped between 3% - 8% on account of the company shifting dispatches from FOR
Page 12 basis to ex-works basis, which was duly factored in the product pricing
DRAFT
Collections from old debtors needs to ramp-up; significant
shortfall in the actual vs. budgeted collections during Oct-19
Weekly Collections – Oct ‘19 PPC Collection breakup – Oct ‘19
Budgeted 11.0 15.0 19.0 - -
Op. debtors 8.7
Actual 6.3 8.4 11.5 - -
20.0 Advances 6.1
18.0
16.0 Others 1.1
Amounts in INR Cr.
14.0
12.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Amounts in INR Cr.
10.0 3.3
8.0 PPI Collection breakup – Oct ‘19
2.3
6.0
2.1
4.0 7.9 Op. debtors
5.6
2.0 4.0
- - - Advances
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5
Others
PPC PPI Others Shortfall Total
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
17.5 7.7 1.0 18.8 45 Amounts in INR Cr.
Account wise collections breakup PPC debtors ageing (30Sept19) PPI debtors ageing (30Sept19)
3 13%
SBI TRA Not Due Not Due
27%
Other SBI 2 0-30 days 32% 8%
0-30 days
Yes 30-60 days 30-60 days 43%
INR 26 Cr. INR 32 Cr. INR 85 Cr. 9%
Axis 60-90 days 60-90 days
IDBI 90-180 days 90-180 days
16% 11%
21 >180 days >180 days
18%
4% 16%
3%
50% 45%
Capacity Utilisation 200 Dispatch in INR lac
168.56
39%
40% 160
35% 132.60
32%
30% 27% 120 110.11
24% 105.12
23% 56.87
21% 33.22 84.12
20% 15% 17% 18% 80
15% 52.30 62.49
13% 47.38 29.49 31.71
11% 11% 40.90
10% 8% 8% 7% 6% 40 21.55
18.87 13.16
9.88 5.28
1% 13.50
0% 0 3.26
Roto Mould Blow Mould Fibre Plastic Sheet Roto Mould Blow Mould Fibre Plastic Sheet
Reinforced Sections Moulded Reinforced Section Moulded
Plastic Compoud Plastic Compund
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Production Data in the form of MIS is provided to the EY team on a daily basis
Page 15
Production data from 16th Sep’19 to 13th Oct’19 – Namakkal -
DRAFT
improved capacity utilisation of blow moulding facilities
Production in MT Dispatch in MT
60 56 80 79
50
39 60
38 36
40
31 40 38
30 24 40
30
20 24
20 18 20
10 20 14
10
0 0
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Production Data in the form of MIS is provided to the EY team on a daily basis
Page 16
Production data from 16th Sep’19 to 13th Oct’19 – Uluberia –
DRAFT
improved capacity utilisation due to RM availability
Production in MT Dispatch in MT
70 64 63 90
79
60 54 80
51
50 70 62
60 53
40
30 50
30 22 38
40
20 25
8 30
10 15
0 20 11
0 8
10
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
0
Roto Mould Blow Mould Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Roto Mould Blow Mould
Capacity Utilisation Dispatch in INR lac
70% 66% 66% 250
Production Data in the form of MIS is provided to the EY team on a daily basis
Page 17
Production data from 16th Sep’19 to 13th Oct’19 – Nalagarh –
DRAFT
improved capacity utilisation due to RM availability
Production in MT Dispatch in MT
40 36 50 44
35 32
40
30 26
30
25 30
18 23 23
20
14 20
15
12
10 7
10 5
5 1 3
- -
- 0
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
140
40% 37%
35% 116.29
35% 32% 120
30% 27% 100
25% 80 73.06
18% 18% 61.02
20% 55.19
60
15%
40
10% 23.32
5% 20 9.15 4.71
0% 0% 2.21
0% 0
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Production Data in the form of MIS is provided to the EY team on a daily basis
Page 18
Production data from 16th Sep’19 to 13th Oct’19 – Butibori –
DRAFT
prioritisation of roto moulding in line with regional firm orders
Production in MT Dispatch in MT
25 24
30
20 25
20 25
14 20 18
15 13
15 12
10
6 10
6
5 3 3 3
5 2
- - -
- 0
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Roto Mould Blow Mould
Roto Mould Blow Mould
40% 37% 60
35% 33% 46.26
31% 50
30%
23% 40
25%
29.05
20% 30
15%
10% 20
10% 11.51
10 7.52 6.30 6.59
5% 5.17
0% 0% 0%
0% 0
Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14 Week 11 Week 12 Week 13 Week 14
Roto Mould Blow Mould Roto Mould Blow Mould
Production Data in the form of MIS is provided to the EY team on a daily basis
600
All Values are in INR Cr.
500
400 332
300 217
191 173
200 166
100 236 200
139 122 105
-
(131) (137) (149) (136) (148)
-100
-200
Mar-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19
Inventory Receivables Payables
Split of Debtors – Jul’ 19* Split of Creditors – Jun’ 19* Split in Inventory – Sep’19
3% 0% 2%
9% 29%
12% 21% RM
Related Party Not Due
10%
PPI-NG 0-30 Days
SFG
45% PPC 31-60 Days
18%
PPI-G 14% 61-90 Days FG
PPM-NG 91-180 Days
28% Stores &
PPM-G > 180 Days
spares
22% 18%
13% 56%
(*) The company has yet to provide information on the ageing of debtors and creditors as of Sep-19.
Page 21 Further, inventory details as represented here is as per management information maintained and we are Table of Contents
yet to review the same
Cash flow
Summary
DRAFT
Cash flow from 16th Sept to 13th Oct 2019 – cash buildup
observed on account of lag in payments despite collections
Amounts in INR Crore
Page 23
DRAFT
Weekly collections during 16th Sept to 13th Oct 2019 fell short of budgeted
collection on account of high employee attrition and festivities during Oct-19
Amounts in INR Crore
Actual Collections
(*) These amounts primarily relate to certain duty draw backs and tax refunds.
Budgetary Variance
Week 11 (16Sep – 22Sep) Week 12 (23Sep - 29Sep) Week 13 (30Sep – 6Oct) Week 14 (7Oct – 13Oct) Total (16Sep – 13Oct)
Particulars
Budget Actual Shortfall Budget Actual Shortfall Budget Actual Shortfall Budget Actual Shortfall Budget Actual Shortfall
PPC (B2C) 9.50 7.54 1.96 9.50 8.16 1.34 7.0 7.49 -0.49 9.0 3.94 5.06 35.00 27.13 7.87
PPI (B2B) 4.82 2.14 2.68 5.00 2.16 2.84 4.0 2.70 1.30 6.0 1.46 4.54 19.82 8.46 11.36
Total 14.32 9.68 4.64 14.50 10.32 4.18 11.00 10.19 0.81 15.00 5.40 9.60* 54.82 35.59 19.23
(*) As explained by the company, collections during Week 14 (7 – 13 Oct 2019) suffered on account of ongoing festivities (Navratri and Dussera)
Page 24
DRAFT
While certain banks have adjusted overdues during the reporting
period, ~50% of total payments could be routed for production
Amounts in INR Crore
Particulars Week 2 – Week 10 % of Total Payments Week 11 –Week 14 % of Total Payments
LC Repayment 11.48 12% - 0%
Production & Dispatch Expenses 33.36 34% 16.79* 49%
Other Operating Expenses 29.13 30% 13.23** 39%
Recovery of Bank Dues 23.95 24% 4.00$ 12%
Grand Total 97.92 100% 34.01 100%
(*) INR 13 Cr. (38% of total payments during Week 11-14) has been towards procurement of raw materials, stores and consumables (vs. INR 21.54 Cr i.e. 22%
of total payments during Week 2-10) , thus directly translating into production. This has been primarily driven by advance payments in lieu of discontinued LCs
(**) Of these amounts, INR 2.38 Cr was paid towards industrial all risk insurance policy for 4 months and an amount of INR 2.6 Cr was paid towards GST.
Accordingly, the monthly fixed costs (post considering proportionate amount of insurance premium paid) amounts to INR 8.85 Cr during the reporting period.
($) as mentioned in the previous slides, amounts were adjusted by Yes Bank during the reporting period of INR 1.4 Cr being towards LC repayment against
overdrawn LCs (INR 0.93 Cr) and interest repayments (INR 0.39 Cr) and that by Axis Bank INR 2.6 Cr is towards loan recovery against facility availed
amounting to INR 240 Cr as per company
Page 25
DRAFT
Summary of budgeted vs. actual payments recommended by EY
Amounts in INR Crore
Shortfall in Shortfall in
Particulars Budgeted* Requested Recommended Paid
Request Recommendation
Duty & Taxes 3.51 2.68 2.64 2.89 0.83 0.04
Rent & Storage 0.12 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.10 0.01
Insurance 0.00 2.39 2.38 2.38 -2.38 0.00
Selling & Distribution 0.70 0.80 0.39 0.43 -0.10 0.42
Administrative & other Expenses 0.64 0.74 0.39 0.34 -0.10 0.35
Petty Cash 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.05 -0.04 -
Consultancy & Professional Fee 0.46 0.42 0.30 0.19 0.04 0.12
Salary & Employee Expenses 6.65 3.69 3.95 5.79 2.96 -0.25
Power & Fuel & Other Utility 0.62 1.32 1.28 0.80 -0.70 0.04
Labour & Mfg Expenses 3.82 3.61 2.83 2.42 0.21 0.79
Transporter - 0.66 0.08 0.56 -0.66 0.58
Raw Material 16.97 18.92 15.62 10.32 -1.95 3.30
Stores and Consumables 4.28 6.87 4.16 3.05 -2.59 2.71
LC Repayment - - - - - -
Interest - - - 0.09 - -
Others - - 0.04 - - -0.04
Total 37.79 42.18 34.12 29.36 -4.39 8.06
Shortfall in Request = Budget – Request Received | Excess request is on account unfulfilled requests from previous weeks being rolled
over in future budgets
Shortfall in recommendation = Request Received – Recommendation | This is primarily on account of delays in providing underlying
documents for EY review and recommendations along with certain payments not being recommended due to inadequate rationale
(*) based on collections forecast for the week plus available bank balance at the time of the meeting
Page 26
DRAFT
Detailed view of weekly payments from 16th September to 13th
October 2019 Amounts in INR Lakhs
* Includes Payment of INR 233 lacs towards plant insurance for four months
Page 27 Table of Contents
3
Auto Division
I. Business Analysis
II. Business cash flow monitoring
III. Financial analysis & working
capital assessment
Business overview
DRAFT
Drop in sales for the largest Auto OEMs over the last 15 months
indicate major sectoral stress…
Maruti Suzuki sales snapshot TATA Motors sales snapshot
42%
58%
15%
32%
An assessment of the 6 largest Auto OEMs indicate an average drop in sales of 30% across the board in the 15 month
period starting June’ 18. TATA Motors seems to be the most affected by the macro slowdown with sales falling over 50%
while Hyundai seems to be the least affected with a 16% drop in sales over the period
Source: EY analysis
Page 30
DRAFT
For SBAPL sectoral stress is indicative in the offtake volumes
across key OEMs in Q1 and Q2 FY ‘20
55% drop 58% drop
60 15.0%
13.0%
50 9 10.7%
4 11.0%
3 1
Revenue in INR Cr.
40 12
7 9.0%
9.2% 9.5% 1
EBITDA%
30 7.6% 7.0%
7.2%
6.50%
5.0%
20
2.2% 3.0%
10
1.0%
43 45 41 41 35 33 34
0 (1.0%)
Q3'18-19 (avg pm) Q4'18-19 (avg pm) Q1'19-20 (avg pm) Jul'19 Aug'19 Sep' 19 Oct' 19 (Estm.)
► The Indian automobile industry has witnessed a plunge in domestic sales in excess of 30% (basis initial reports from SIAM) in
the recent few months (August’19 being the 5th consecutive month for drop in sales in FY 19-20)
► The sudden dip in profitability for Sep’ 19 is on account of significant tooling sales for KIA Motors (INR 11.57 Cr), which is
mainly related to development of moulds for future supply work to KIA. The development was done at cost but other fixed
expenses allocated to tooling for mould development incurred a net loss of INR 1.08 Cr
► The expected sales and EBITDA assessment in October’ 19 is based on orders available from OEMs and projections based on
achievement of actual sales till 17th October 2019.
While the profitability for the month has been impacted on account of mould development expenses for KIA, it is essential to
ensure business continuity for future orders of KIA. This was a one time activity for the month of September
Page 32
DRAFT
Breakdown of sales for the month of Sep’ 19
Chennai - I 3% Hyundai
6%
23% 2%
Chennai - II incl. 19% 2% TVS Motor
2% 20%
Paint shop Mahindra & Mahindra
3%
Chennai - III/
3% Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
Precitech
Hosur 3% KIA Motors India Pvt Ltd
General Motors
3%
Pune incl. LRTM 13% SINTEX LOGISTICS LLC
4%
Sohna 25% 15% FAURECIA
6% 4% SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC
Pithampur
11% SEOYON E-HWA Automotive
5% India
SUZUKI MOTOR GUJARAT
PVT LTD
Breakup of tooling sales by customer Borgwarner
13% 15%
100%
4% SMRC AUTOMOTIVE
Moth PRODUCTS INDIA
90%
Rane TRW
erson TATA Motors
2%
2%
80%
Others
70% Hyundai
Note on Tooling sales for Kia Motors
96% 22% • Total mould development and tooling sales to KIA ~ INR 11.57 Cr
60%
Kia • Total RM/ BOP/ Consumable consumption – INR 11.66 Cr.
Motors
50%
Asian Auto • Travelling expenses accounted for customer visits ~ INR ~ 20 Lacs
40% 74% with Salary cost ~ INR 2.5 Lacs
30% • Other fixed cost incl. ~ INR 78 Lacs
Tooling Sales
Page 33
DRAFT
Growth in sales for Chennai – I is largely driven on account of
tooling sales to Hyundai for Sep’ 19
INR Lacs
1,039 1,014 1,003
INR Lacs
941
Avg p.m. Q1 FY '20 Jul' 19 Aug' 19 Sep' 19 Avg p.m. Q1 FY '20 Jul' 19 Aug' 19 Sep' 19 Avg p.m. Q1 FY '20 Jul' 19 Aug' 19 Sep' 19
FY' 19 Avg p.m. FY' 19 Avg p.m. FY' 19 Avg p.m.
1% 5% 139 27%
1,195 127
1,057 1,061 1,089 114 115
102
861 873
801
INR Lacs
738
INR Lacs
INR Lacs
615 648
Avg p.m. Q1 FY '20 Jul' 19 Aug' 19 Sep' 19 Avg p.m. Q1 FY '20 Jul' 19 Aug' 19 Sep' 19 Avg p.m. Q1 FY '20 Jul' 19 Aug' 19 Sep' 19
FY' 19 Avg p.m. FY' 19 Avg p.m. FY' 19 Avg p.m.
Page 34
XX% MoM sales decline between Aug and Sep’ 19 XX% MoM sales growth between Aug and Sep’ 19
DRAFT
Plant and customer wise split in share of OEM sales for Sep’ 19
Socomec Others
30% 22%
TATA Motors TVS Motor
Mahindra & Mahindra 7% Mahindra & Mahindra 17%
19% 55%
SINTEX LOGISTICS LLC
Force Motors Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
95%
31% 66%
General Motors
16%
LRTM business unit largely supplies to export customers in US via Sintex Logistics LLC
SU2i,
Chennai - I Hyundai INR 49 Cr. 100%
New Alto
Swift
11% 8% ME 3
Wheeler
13% S110
4% S201
30%
Pune Mahindra INR 17 Cr. 7%
U308
27% W501
XUV500 &
TUV300
K1,
Pune FOTON INR 14 Cr. 100%
T-Cross,
Pune Volkswagen INR 37 Cr. 100%
4% Q502
10%
26% Q5 BSVI
12% Nexon BS6
Pune TATA Motors INR 78 Cr. X445
16% 16% TIAGO TIGOR
Tiago
16%
Others
IAC
20%
MTWL
41%
7% Piaggio
Pithampur Miscellaneous INR 17 Cr.
VECV
18%
VECV Bus
8% 7%
VW
T1N,
Pithampur FORCE Motors INR 26 Cr. 100%
AH2
19%
HCI
9%
Chennai - I Hyundai INR 6 Cr.
2%
QXI
71%
SU2i
Nexon
Refresh
14% 12%
Q5 BSVI
X445
6%
MG Motors
46% 42%
MTWL
Pithampur Miscellaneous INR 12 Cr.
12% Shakti
Pumps
• ‘Word of mouth’ information floating around in the Industry with regards to a dip in the financial health of
Sintex BAPL (‘SBAPL’) . Consequently, many of the OEMs did not want to consider SBAPL as a potential
bidder for new RFQs
• Additionally, in certain cases we understand that there was a ‘conscious call’ from the Mgmt. on account of
low profitability associate with certain products
• DRAFT ‘Communication Mail’ to be sent to all OEMs on the existing • DRAFT prepared – To be
stability in the financial health of SBAPL and that we remain circulated post signing of
committed to fulfilling their schedules the ICA
• Have ‘Face to Face’ meeting with key stakeholders across OEMs to • Tentative list for meeting
ensure that they continue to give robust delivery schedules and key stakeholders being
include SBAPL as part of new RFQs to be initiated prepared
RM/ PM/ Paints & Thinners/ On account of a tighter procurement cycle and rigorous monitoring on
14.7%
BOP payments – Key RM cost conservation up by ~ 15%
Other variable Mfg. Reduction on account of a more stringent sales & operations planning
4.9%
expenses basis order book strength
Other fixed Mfg. expenses 12.2% Basis cost reduction initiatives undertaken by the Mgmt.
Page 42
DRAFT
Cost reduction initiatives implemented as part of way forward
approach in Sohna plant
Category Savings (INR Lacs) Comments
Reduction in lease 1.44 • Reduction in area of usage in Manesar warehouse used for MSIL
shipments
Page 43
DRAFT
Cost reduction initiatives implemented as part of way forward
approach in Pune plant
Category Savings (INR Lacs) Comments
• VFD installation
Power cost 0.78
• Provisioning of centralized auxiliary equipment
• Line Balancing
RM/ Consumable cost 0.75
• Productivity and Throughput improvements
Page 44
DRAFT
Cost structure for product sales for the month of Sep’ 19 and
MoM comparison with Sep’ 19
39%
14% 3%
100% 2% 2%
5%
5% 4%
12%
7%
6%
Revenue RM Bought out Packing Paints/ Stores & Power and Other variable Freight Other fixed Admin. & EBITDA
Consumption parts Material Thinners/ spares/ Fuel charges Mfg. expenses expenses Mfg. expenses Corp.
Others Consumables overheads
4.7% 7.7% 37.4% 15.6% 16.6% 9.7% 32.6% 5.6% 0.9% 11.4% 42.7% 94 bp
Notes
• While product sales has a margin of 6.3% for the month of Sep’ 19, overall EBITDA for the month is ~ 2.25% on account of an INR 1
Cr. of net loss in project sales.
• However, this was a 1 time activity for the month and profitability is expected to increase for Oct’ 19
bp – Basis points
Page 45 Table of Contents
Working Capital Analysis
DRAFT
Movement in working capital between 30th June to 30th Sep –
period of monitoring
Aggregate WC 4,693 3,341 4,315 4,884
Split of Debtors – 30th Sep’ 19 Split of Creditors – 30th Sep’ 19 Split in Inventory – 30th Sep’ 19
3% 3% 10%
Not Due 18%
Not Due
6%
Page 47
DRAFT
Related party receivable position as on 30th Sep, 2019
All figures are in INR lacs
4% 4% 3%
96 100
% 96% 97%
%
BAPL Rototech Sintex Logistics LLC is based out of US and handles export sales for Sintex Auto division. The
entity takes FG as input, does assembling and minor job work and markets the product in mainland
Sintex Logistics LLC US. The company is in the process of recovering all balance dues from Sintex logistics in the
normal course of business
Page 48
DRAFT
Receivable/Payable Position (Non Related Party) as on 30th Sep,
2019
Outstanding Debtor Position (Non Related Party) as on 31st August 2019 All figures are in INR lacs
De-Centralized process pre 24th July Centralized process from 24th July
Chennai - I
Page 51
DRAFT
Overall status of inflows and outflows for the period - 24th July
15th October
INR Lacs
• The payments process has been centralized and w.e.f 20th September, 2019 payments are now being made from the TRA A/c being maintained with SBI
• Collections from customers are being received in the current a/c no. 6407 being maintained with Kotak Bank. However, the balance at the end of the day is
auto swept to the TRA A/c.
• CAPEX has been incurred towards purchasing Trolley’s and toilet renovation, roof cleaning, shed painting at plants
• Salary and Employee payments include salaries and reimbursements. Approx. 8%-12% increments have been given to the employees across locations.
• Duty payments have been mainly towards GST, TDS, PF and ESIC dues
• Fund Transfers have been made to BOB Pune and SBI Sohna A/c which is mainly being utilised for making statutory payments
• Total payments made include Forex payments made of Rs. 144 lacs which where mainly towards Raw Material and Bought out parts
• Collections include Rs. 1365 lacs received from KIA motors towards project sales on 20th September, 2019
Page 52
DRAFT
Monthly Cashflows – Auto Division – 24th July 2019 to 15th Oct
2019
Particulars 24th to 31st Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19 1st to 15th Oct-19 Total
Opening Balance 225 365 682 2,260 225
Collections 1,117 5,529 5,329 2,135 14,110
Total Fund Available 1,342 5,894 6,011 4,395 14,335
Page 53
DRAFT
Status of Payments – Auto Division – 24th July to 15th Oct 2019
24 July - 29 July - 05 Aug - 12 Aug - 19 Aug - 26 Aug - 02 Sep - 09 Sep - 16 Sep - 23 Sep - 30 Sep - 07 Oct - 14 Oct -
Total
Particulars 28 July 04 Aug 11 Aug 18 Aug 25 Aug 01Sep 08 Sep 15 Sep 22 Sep 29 Sep 06 Oct 13 Oct 15 Oct
Opening Balance 225 645 920 1,072 1,252 539 681 450 419 2,353 2,260 2,299 2,035 225
Collections 755 1,224 1,019 1,630 929 1,088 942 538 2,732 700 1,327 450 777 14,111
Total Fund Available 980 1,869 1,939 2,702 2,181 1,627 1,623 988 3,151 3,053 3,587 2,749 2,812 14,336
Payments : Breakup 335 948 867 1,450 1,642 946 1,173 569 798 793 1,288 714 589 12,112
Raw Material 283 427 350 658 587 455 381 273 203 359 478 297 265 5,016
Duty & Taxes - 9 27 394 165 18 34 47 504 0 - 1 5 1,205
Bought Out Parts 1 104 102 120 270 139 148 94 17 149 197 64 160 1,567
Salary & Employee 0 141 160 2 71 9 391 9 1 7 315 35 8 1,148
Labour & Mfg Expenses - 32 52 106 121 106 6 70 25 76 31 40 26 692
Power & Fuel 2 7 86 10 71 8 82 20 9 53 4 92 3 447
Transporter 3 100 20 17 85 35 45 12 14 3 49 54 36 474
Packing Material - 10 21 42 37 31 11 10 2 51 22 28 18 284
Stores & Consumables 6 35 27 37 34 25 5 4 0 31 38 18 4 263
Administrative & other Expenses 11 27 12 33 34 9 13 15 4 19 34 16 9 233
Rent & Storage 28 28 - - 3 69 - 1 3 12 28 22 1 196
Insurance - - - - 0 4 37 0 0 - 2 - - 44
Repairs & Maintenance - 2 6 8 23 6 12 6 0 12 6 21 16 118
Projects - - - - 124 11 - - 11 13 78 8 0 246
Consultancy & Professional Fee - - 0 6 10 11 2 7 0 2 3 8 29 78
CAPEX - 12 3 17 8 11 5 0 1 - 3 8 9 78
Import / Export Expense - - - - - - - - - 2 1 - 0 3
Selling & Distribution - - - - - 0 - - - - - - - 0
Unapproved (PDC's / Cash
Withdrawn) 2 14 2 2 2 - - - 20
Closing Balance 645 920 1,072 1,252 539 681 450 419 2,353 2,260 2,299 2,035 2,224 2,224
• The payments process has been centralized and are now being made from the TRA A/c being maintained with SBI
• CAPEX has been incurred towards purchasing Trolley’s and toilet renovation, roof cleaning, shed painting at plants
• Salary and Employee payments include salaries and reimbursements
• Fund Transfers have been made to BOB Pune A/c which is mainly being utilised for making statutory payments
• Total payments made include Forex payments made of Rs. 129.39 lacs which where mainly towards Raw Material and Bought out parts
Page 54
DRAFT
Budget vs actual fund flow assessment – 24th July to 15th
October
Pending to be paid post
Requested Verified Pending for Rejected Processed
Categories Total Budget collection of overdue
(A+B+C) (A) clarifications (B) (C) (D)
receivables (A-D)
RM/BOP/PM 6,988 8,052 7,827 9 215 6,867 960
Stores & Consumables 267 293 292 0 1 263 29
14,110
11,614
2,496 lacs
INR lacs
Budgeted Actual
Page 55
DRAFT
Breakdown of inflows and outflows by plant for the period
24th July – 15th October
Sales Vs Collections share Plant wise payment share
141
3% 2%1%
Chennai I 4%
All Values in INR Cr.
6% 25%
Chennai II
Additional Collections
Pune
of INR 13 Cr.
128 Sohna
Chennai IIA 17%
Pithampur
Corporate
LRTM Pune 21%
Sales for the Collections for
period the period Hosur
21%
Category wise payment share
CAPEX 13%
Misc. payments incl. Admin Exp. Rent and Storage, Repairs and Maintenance, Consultancy and Professional Fees, Insurance
Page 56
DRAFT
Breakdown of payments to major raw material suppliers
Page 57
DRAFT
Average P2P timelines split by category of payments (In
Monitoring phase)
RM, PM, BOP Stores & consumables,
Page 58
DRAFT
Banking Arrangement – List of Bank Accounts
Page 62
DRAFT
Payment process – Documents required (2/2)
All payment requests for a particular day to be sent by EOD of previous day along with status of funds update from finance team
and payment recommendation as per defined matrix. In case payment request is more than fund availability, firm collection
details to be provided, failing which, excess payments will not be approved