FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM INDEXPage

NO. 1652178/2021
of 1
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

To : Daniel Newhouse (x. 501) From: Dan Hoeg

Subject : Re: Meeks and Jamaica RFP

The deal fell through early on. I don't believe they were used.

I couldn't find any information on what kind of credits they were.

Dan Hoeg

From: Daniel Newhouse <dnewhouse@peeblescorp.com>

Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:50:58 +0000
To: Dan Hoeg<dan@danhoeg.com>
Cc: R. Donahue Peebles<RDPeebles@peeblescorp.com>
Subject: RE: Meeks and Jamaica RFP

Dan, did they use the tax credits? And in what form?  
  
From: Dan Hoeg [mailto:dan@danhoeg.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 7:37 AM
To: R. Donahue Peebles
Cc: Daniel Newhouse
Subject: Meeks and Jamaica RFP 
  
Don and Dan, 
 
I’m not sure if you two are aware, but Rep. Meeks might be under Federal investigation relating to the GJDC
and this Jamaica Site. So that might be an extra consideration for you. It’s not well sourced, and most cite
the same NYPost article: 
‐ NYPost:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/queens/meeks_money_probe_uknt7GxOclGKuCMcgpTx8M 
‐ TRD: http://therealdeal.com/blog/2012/07/31/queens-development-agency-undergoes-federal-
probe/ 
‐ MyFoxNews: http://www.myfoxny.com/story/19154371/rep-gregory-meeks 
‐ Meeks, “GJDC Should Be Doing More”: http://www.qchron.com/editions/south/meeks-says-the-
gjdc-should-be-doing-more/article_33d8edbc-cc76-5ddd-bfcd-d05711adc953.html 
 
Regarding equity and TCs, the last time this property went to RFP, the “developer got $21MM in tax credits”. 
 
Lastly, GJDC bought the smaller site (the other Jamaica RFP) in 2004 for $2.7MM. If Greater Jamaica fails to
chose a developer by the building it purchased from the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, the Port
Authority would retake the building. 
 
Regards, 
dansig.png

 
 
D a n H o e g 
T H E H O E G C O R P O R A T I O N 
O : 6 4 6 6 2 7 2 1 4 8 
C : 9 5 4 2 5 3 6 9 1 6 
E : d a n @ d a n h o e g . c o m 
 
3 Please consider the environment when printing emails. 
 
  

about:blank 11/5/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM Page
INDEX NO.1 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

“GOOD THOUGHT; MAYBE WE CAN GET MICHELLE OBAMA INVOLVED.”

I can see that as being a massive plus

dansig.p
ng

Dan Hoeg
THE HOEG CORPORATION
O: 646 627 2148
C: 954 253 6916
E: dan@THEHOEGCORPORATION.COM

P Please consider the environment when printing emails.

Unless otherwise expressly stated, this e-mail should not and cannot be construed to form a contract or binding agreement of any kind. Nothing in this
message should be regarded as a digital or electronic signature or writing. As such, any signatures contained herein are for purely illustrative purposes only
and do not convey intent to be contractually bound. Only express words of agreement can be construed as such; this email is not a contract and not
intended to create any rights, obligations, or warranties.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and/or
intended. If you have received this email in error, please notify The Hoeg Corporation via info@thehoegcorporation.com. This message contains confidential
information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute nor copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the
intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. Additionally, this email is protected by all applicable attorney - client and attorney work - product privileges.

From: R. Donahue Peebles [mailto:RDPeebles@peeblescorp.com]

Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 1:22 PM
To: Dan Hoeg
Cc: Daniel Newhouse
Subject: Re: Follow-Up from Proposal Interview/Presentation

good work. See my comments:

Regards,

Don Peebles

On Mar 23, 2013, at 7:35 PM, "Dan Hoeg" <dan@thehoegcorporation.com> wrote:

RDP: DANIEL N. SUGGESTED WE USE THE KRAMER, LEVIN MARK UP OF THE CHAMBERS
CONTRACT AS A TEMPLATE. THAT'S A GOOD IDEA SO USE THAT AS A TEMPLATE. I THINK WE TELL
THEM WE WILL USE THE SAME CONTRACT AS 346 BROADWAY AND CHAMBERS STREET WITH
JUST PROPERTY SPECIFIC CHANGES. DANIEL WILL SEND YOU THIS CONTRACT AND YOU CAN
SHOW OUR CHANGES TO THE CHAMBERS CONTRACT IN REDLINE.

DH:      I will use 346 broadway as a template. I mentioned to him that being explicit that the
contract is a “Draft Transactional Document” can help prevent it from being binding
in any way.

I also must be explicit that I’m not acting in any legal capacity and I’m not
representing you as an attorney.UNDERSTOOD

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM Page
INDEX NO.2 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

RDP: Also, Lender Letters of Support from a lender and a Harlem-based Community Facility
User will be critical. LET'S FOCUS ON THEM THIS WEEK. I ASKED DANIEL N TO SPEAK WITH HIG
AND APOLLO FOR DEBT AND EQUITY LETTERS FOR A CONDO. PLEASE GET A STATUS FROM
DANIEL AND KEEP ME IN THE LOOP. 

DH:      I will follow up with him on this and get him the underwriting for Monday.  Will we also
be reaching out to an 80/20 lender to provide the EDC with options moving forward?

YES, WE WILL REACH OUT TO GOLDMAN SACHS

11. Environmental Issues: We must be mindful of the current use of the property and get an
indemnity from the EDC for environmental issues.
DH: Site is E-designated, which will require environmental remediation (Stage I and II) prior to
residential development. WE NEED TO PRICE THIS BASED UPON THEID REPORT.

RDP: WHO IS THE EDC SUGGESTING PAY FOR IT?

DH:       The RFP’s proposed contract has the Purchaser assuming full environmental risk,
costs, etc.

I’m not sure the EDC knows that this site is E-120 (Underground Gasoline Storage
Tanks, Possible Subsurface Contamination).  It came up during my research before
the RFEI.  The EDC made no mention of it in the RFP or RFEI, but we would have to go
through an OER process to get a green light from the DOB. OER process varies in
length, but certainly won’t be less than 90 days, could be up to 150 days if the Phase
II shows up ground contamination.

The E-designation cleanup grant is capped at $5,000, but we receive LEED credits
and state and federal credits (the site is in the NYS Environmental Zone and Federal
Empowerment Zone), which vary depending on amount of remediation.

WE MUST ACCOUNT FPR THIS COST IN OUR PRICING.

12. Community Space: We will need a line item for the build out of community space should
we provide it.
DH: A letter of support, commitment, etc. would be helpful from a Harlem based possible
tenant.  Ines Dickens’ input here would be very helpful. Then we could use her
recommendation verbatim.
RDP: OK I WILL CALL HER AND FIND OUT HER PREFERENCE. 

DH:       For your reference, when I introduced you to CM Dickens, she told us that she
wanted to see a “culinary arts learning center”. 

I’ve identified “Harlem Seeds”, a food-justice organization, as a possible tenant that

could work within our programming (youth oriented, not for homeless, indigent,
etc.).  Inez has attended some of their events.

Harlem Seeds: www.harlemseeds.org

“Harlem Seeds’ mission is to inspire young people to live long healthy lives; by
empowering them to make appropriate food and lifestyle choices. Healthy living is a
right, not a privilege. Educating our young people about growing foods in a

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM Page
INDEX NO.3 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

sustainable environment and using their harvest to fuel their bodies, by exercising,
and interacting with each other with the expectation of developing positive
community leaders as they mature.”

 GOOD THOUGHT; MAYBE WE CAN GET MICHELLE OBAMA INVOLVED.

<image001.png>

Dan Hoeg
THE HOEG CORPORATION
O: 646 627 2148
C: 954 253 6916
E: dan@THEHOEGCORPORATION.COM

P Please consider the environment when printing emails.

Unless otherwise expressly stated, this e-mail should not and cannot be construed to form a contract or
binding agreement of any kind. Nothing in this message should be regarded as a digital or electronic
signature or writing. As such, any signatures contained herein are for purely illustrative purposes only and
do not convey intent to be contractually bound.  Only express words of agreement can be construed as
such; this email is not a contract and not intended to create any rights, obligations, or warranties.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed and/or intended. If you have received this email in error,
please notify The Hoeg Corporation via info@thehoegcorporation.com. This message contains
confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named
addressee you should not disseminate, distribute nor copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your
system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or
taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Additionally, this
email is protected by all applicable attorney - client and attorney work - product privileges.

From: R. Donahue Peebles [mailto:RDPeebles@peeblescorp.com]

Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 6:45 PM
To: Dan Hoeg
Cc: Daniel Newhouse
Subject: Re: Follow-Up from Proposal Interview/Presentation

See my comments below.

Regards,

Don Peebles

On Mar 23, 2013, at 4:38 PM, "Dan Hoeg" <dan@thehoegcorporation.com> wrote:

The modified financial models with your changes will follow shortly.  Some of your comments
will require further discussion, I have marked them below.

Please do not insure or commit to any expenditure without consultants without my prior
approval.
Confirmed, I haven’t. I don’t believe any consultants have contributed to this RFP response,
excluding The Hoeg Corporation and ARQ.   However, I must note again that this RFP
response requires a Legal Team’s contract mark-up/redline that was not done for the RFEI. 

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM Page
INDEX NO.4 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

This is a necessary item.DANIEL N. SUGGESTED WE USE THE KRAMER, LEVIN MARK UP OF THE
CHAMBERS CONTRACT AS A TEMPLATE. THAT'S A GOOD IDEA SO USE THAT AS A TEMPLATE. I
THINK WE TELL THEM WE WILL USE THE SAME CONTRACT AS 346 BROADWAY AND CHAMBERS
STREET WITH JUST PROPERTY SPECIFIC CHANGES. DANIEL WILL SEND YOU THIS CONTRACT AND
YOU CAN SHOW OUR CHANGES TO THE CHAMBERS CONTRACT IN REDLINE.

Also, Lender Letters of Support from a lender and a Harlem-based Community Facility User
will be critical. LET'S FOCUS ON THEM THIS WEEK. I ASKED DANIEL N TO SPEAK WITH HIG AND
APOLLO FOR DEBT AND EQUITY LETTERS FOR A CONDO. PLEASE GET A STATUS FROM DANIEL
AND KEEP ME IN THE LOOP. 

Please give me a list or budget for any consultants so I can review and approve.
Consultants Listed on RFP:
- ARQ – Architectural work (I’m unaware of your arrangement)
- Tutor Perini – No contribution
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel – No contribution

Major Current Cost for RFP submission will be printing (~$1000) and folders (~$120, already
purchased).
 OK
I would like to see these updates by the end of the day this Monday. Please check your
template against others we have used in the past so we can minimize omissions. It is
important that we try and cover all potential expenses on the front end of our underwriting.
Please try and send the changes in a red-lined or highlighted version so I can quickly see the
changes.
I’ll have these updates done shortly, but some items will require discussion.  This pro forma
was based on the most recent 346 Broadway template I was given, if there are any newer
ones you can forward them to me and I will incorporate relevant changes.

346 AS A TEMPLATE IS THE MOST RECENT AND INCORPORATE MY COMMENTS.

Additionally, do you have a draft of the RFP submission? This needs to be done as well as draft of the
format of the actual printing of the submission. You should consider ordering the printing of the cover
pages and dividing pages so it's not left until the last minute.
Yes, we have a current draft version.  We expect we will print a week before the deadline, then  insert
other deliverables (architectural, letters of support, etc.).  The only deliverables we will need to insert this
time will be the architectural renderings and plans and letters of support. I have already ordered (Hoeg
Corp. expensed) 7 white-leather covered, stitch bounded 3 ring binders, 5 for the NYC EDC and 2 for
internal purposes.  We can emboss the cover if you’d prefer.  
WHAT EVER YOU THINK LOOKS THE MOST PROFESSIONAL.

Given the fact that Daniel Newhouse is out of the office next week please report these items to me. I am
going to take the lead on the oversight of this RFP submission going forward so you can report to me.
Please use Barron,  Daniel N and Kevin as resources. I want the RFP submission completed two business
days before the deadline.
We plan to submit the RFP Monday, April 8th.

GOOD; MAYBE WE HOLD IT UNTIL THE 11Th SO OUR PRICING DOES NOT GET OUT TO OUR COMPETITORS.

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM Page
INDEX NO.5 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

A helpful tool would be a schedule showing the major steps from now to the actual submissions.
I have been working off the following schedule.

The NYC EDC Deadline is April 11th; Internal deadlines for the Final Draft: (1) April 1st – Final Draft (2) April 2
- 4th - Final Executive Review and Changes, (3) April 5th - Print and Assemble Final Copies (4) April 8 –
Delivery to NYC EDC.

 GOOD SCHEDULE

P1. Average Price psf: increase it to $1,500

P2. Agent Commissions on condo sales: use 6%

P3. Parking Revenue: increase it to :175,000 per space.

P4. There should be a marketing budget: use $1,000,000 as a plug. This will not move much for the larger
building as some of the marketing costs will be covered from the agent commissions.

?5. Development Fee should be increased to 4.5%. THIS IS THE STANDARD FOR ALL OF OUR DEALS; NO
DEVIATIONS WITHOUT MY SPECIFIC APPROVALS. THE BOLD IS FOR ALL OF THE TEAM TO UNDERSTAND.
Development fee is 5% of TDC as per your last email (“The DCB should be modified to reflect a 5%
developers fee on all costs including land as we are having to win an RFP to get the site.”) Please confirm
which you prefer.

5% IS BETTER

P6. Acquisition Fee: use 2%. This is the standard.

7. Real Estate Taxes: they seem low but let's ask for an abatement from the EDC pursuant with the
property being in an enterprises or empowerment zone. Please confirm the property is located in the
zone. Also, go to the EDC site on tax exemptions and abatements. I don't think we have to do 80/20 to
get the abatement but I am not sure.
I will look into this.

8. Mortgage Recording Taxes: this has been a miss on all of our budgets. The EDC can wave or abate
them under certain circumstances. Please check and see if this property is eligible. If so we should ask for
it in our response. 
I will look into this.

?9. LTV Calculations: use 70% of the total acquisition/pre-development cost for debt (there will not be a
separate acquisition loan; just acquisition Pre-development and then a construction loan) this will be
outstanding for 12 months. Then a construction loan for 70% LTV of total project costs including agent
commissions. This loan will close at construction commencement and be outstanding for the duration of
construction and be paid down with the proceeds from unit closings for a period of 6 months after
completion. Please calculate the interest expenses according to this schedule and LTV level.
Should we incorporate the increased property appraisal value after a successful upzoning?

FOR INTERNAL PURPOSES, YES IN ONE MODEL. DO IT BOTH WAYS.

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM Page
INDEX NO.6 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

P10. We need to propose a date to deliver the site vacant by the EDC. We should propose to let the
current user remain in operations throughout the Pre-development phase. 
We are proposing to allow him remain on a short-term, terminable-at-will basis between closing and the
construction start date.  We will qualify it so that it cannot interfere with our right to investigate and
prepare the site.

OK

P11. Environmental Issues: We must be mindful of the current use of the property and get an indemnity
from the EDC for environmental issues.
Site is E-designated, which will require environmental remediation (Stage I and II) prior to residential
development. 

WHO IS THE EDC SUGGESTING PAY FOR IT?

P12. Community Space: We will need a line item for the build out of community space should we provide
it.
A letter of support, commitment, etc. would be helpful from a Harlem based possible tenant.  Ines
Dickens’ input here would be very helpful. Then we could use her recommendation verbatim.

OK I WILL CALL HER AND FIND OUT HER PREFERENCE. 

P13. Also, prepare a DCB for our internal use for  building with the new zoning; one with air
right purchases to get us to 220,000 sf and one without any air rights purchases.

P14. I believe we can pay $150 psf of FAR based upon the rezoning so that puts us in the $24
million range. We can test this pricing in the various scenarios over the next few days.
Pricing has been tested, and return is significantly lower as-of-right (obviously), but still gives
justifiable returns.  I will structure the new models with a Purchase Price/IRR sensitivity
analysis.

THANKS

<image001.png>

Dan Hoeg
THE HOEG CORPORATION
O: 646 627 2148
C: 954 253 6916
E: dan@THEHOEGCORPORATION.COM

P Please consider the environment when printing emails.

From: R. Donahue Peebles [mailto:RDPeebles@peeblescorp.com]

Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 2:50 PM
To: Dan Hoeg
Cc: Daniel Newhouse
Subject: Re: Follow-Up from Proposal Interview/Presentation

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM Page
INDEX NO.7 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

Daniel,

This is a good start. I have identified a few items that should be modified. They are as follows:

1. Average Price psf: increase it to $1,500

2. Agent Commissions on condo sales: use 6%

3. Parking Revenue: increase it to :175,000 per space.

4. There should be a marketing budget: use $1,000,000 as a plug. This will not move much for the larger
building as some of the marketing costs will be covered from the agent commissions.

5. Development Fee should be increased to 4.5%. THIS IS THE STANDARD FOR ALL OF OUR DEALS; NO
DEVIATIONS WITHOUT MY SPECIFIC APPROVALS. THE BOLD IS FOR ALL OF THE TEAM TO UNDERSTAND.

6. Acquisition Fee: use 2%. This is the standard.

7. Real Estate Taxes: they seem low but let's ask for an abatement from the EDC pursuant with the
property being in an enterprises or empowerment zone. Please confirm the property is located in the
zone. Also, go to the EDC site on tax exemptions and abatements. I don't think we have to do 80/20 to
get the abatement but I am not sure.

8. Mortgage Recording Taxes: this has been a miss on all of our budgets. The EDC can wave or abate
them under certain circumstances. Please check and see if this property is eligible. If so we should ask for
it in our response. 

9. LTV Calculations: use 70% of the total acquisition/pre-development cost for debt (there will not be a
separate acquisition loan; just acquisition Pre-development and then a construction loan) this will be
outstanding for 12 months. Then a construction loan for 70% LTV of total project costs including agent
commissions. This loan will close at construction commencement and be outstanding for the duration of
construction and be paid down with the proceeds from unit closings for a period of 6 months after
completion. Please calculate the interest expenses according to this schedule and LTV level.

10. We need to propose a date to deliver the site vacant by the EDC. We should propose to let the
current user remain in operations throughout the Pre-development phase. 

11. Environmental Issues: We must be mindful of the current use of the property and get an indemnity
from the EDC for environmental issues.

12. Community Space: We will need a line item for the buildout of community space should we provide
it.

13. Also, prepare a DCB for our internal use for  building with the new zoning; one with air right purchases
to get us to 220,000 sf and one without any air rights purchases.

14. I believe we can pay $150 psf of FAR based upon the rezoning so that puts us in the $24 million range.
We can test this pricing in the various scenarios over the next few days.

I would like to see these updates by the end of the day this Monday. Please check your template against
others we have used in the past so we can minimize omissions. It is important that we try and cover all
potential expenses on the front end of our underwriting. Please try and send the changes in a red-lined
or highlighted version so I can quickly see the changes.

Additionally, do you have a draft of the RFP submission? This needs to be done as well as draft of the
format of the actual printing of the submission. You should consider ordering the printing of the cover
pages and dividing pages so it's not left until the last minute. A helpful tool would be a schedule showing

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM Page
INDEX NO.8 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

the major steps from now to the actual submissions.

Given the fact that Daniel Newhouse is out of the office next week please report these items to me. I am
going to take the lead on the oversight of this RFP submission going forward so you can report to me.
Please use Barron,  Daniel N and Kevin as resources. I want the RFP submission completed two business
days before the deadline.

Regards,

Don Peebles

On Mar 22, 2013, at 2:43 PM, "Dan Hoeg" <dan@thehoegcorporation.com> wrote:

Attached is the As of Right Condo analysis.
<image001.png>

Dan Hoeg
THE HOEG CORPORATION
O: 646 627 2148
C: 954 253 6916
E: dan@THEHOEGCORPORATION.COM

P Please consider the environment when printing emails.

Unless otherwise expressly stated, this e-mail should not and cannot be construed to form a
contract or binding agreement of any kind. Nothing in this message should be regarded as
a digital or electronic signature or writing. As such, any signatures contained herein are for
purely illustrative purposes only and do not convey intent to be contractually bound.  Only
express words of agreement can be construed as such; this email is not a contract and not
intended to create any rights, obligations, or warranties.

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and/or intended. If you have received
this email in error, please notify The Hoeg Corporation via info@thehoegcorporation.com.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual
named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute nor copy
this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by
mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you
are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Additionally, this email is protected by all
applicable attorney - client and attorney work - product privileges.

From: R. Donahue Peebles [mailto:RDPeebles@peeblescorp.com]

Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 2:21 PM
To: Dan Hoeg
Cc: Daniel Newhouse
Subject: Re: Follow-Up from Proposal Interview/Presentation

Please send me the DCB and pro forma for the full development.

Regards,

Don Peebles

On Oct 25, 2012, at 3:08 PM, "Dan Hoeg" <dan@danhoeg.com> wrote:

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM Page
INDEX NO.9 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

I was thinking a hurdle structure would be more appropriate, but if we go with

that strategy then we should at least include a clawback for hitting built-FAR
milestones.

Chart based on PSF payouts and our cost per your plan.
SF $10 PSF $15 PSF $20 PSF $25 PSF
200,000 2MM 3MM 4MM 5MM
300,000 3MM 4.5MM 6MM 7.5MM
400,000 4MM 6MM 8MM 10MM
500,000 5MM 7.5MM 10MM 12.5MM
600,000 6MM 9MM 12MM 15MM
660,000 6.6MM 9.9MM 13.2MM 16.5MM

From: R. Donahue Peebles [mailto:RDPeebles@peeblescorp.com]

Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 2:41 PM
To: Daniel Newhouse; Dan Hoeg
Subject: RE: Follow-Up from Proposal Interview/Presentation

Agreed. That’s my thinking

From: Daniel Newhouse

Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:14 AM
To: Dan Hoeg; R. Donahue Peebles
Subject: RE: Follow-Up from Proposal Interview/Presentation

I agree with Don’s formula. Additional FAR profit should well exceed the $25, so
in my opinion, I don’t see them taking that view.  

From: Dan Hoeg [mailto:dan@danhoeg.com]

Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:09 AM
To: R. Donahue Peebles
Cc: Daniel Newhouse
Subject: RE: Follow-Up from Proposal Interview/Presentation

Kevin and I have started underwriting with a $10MM acquisition price.  My

concern is that GJDC will see us paying a bonus based on FAR we build as a
disincentive for us to maximize FAR.

<image001.png>

From: R. Donahue Peebles [mailto:RDPeebles@peeblescorp.com]

Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:56 AM
To: Daniel Newhouse
Cc: Dan Hoeg
Subject: Re: Follow-Up from Proposal Interview/Presentation

When we reply we should address price. My thinking is we pay $10 million at

closing and something on the back end tied to developed FAR after
completion. Maybe based upon $25 per FAR. Let me know your thoughts. 

Regards,

Don Peebles 

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/2021 04:48 PM PageNO.
INDEX 10 of 10
652178/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2021

On Oct 23, 2012, at 9:44 AM, "Daniel Newhouse"

<dnewhouse@peeblescorp.com> wrote:
Fyi

From: Mikki Columbus

Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 1:42:09 PM
To: Daniel Newhouse
Cc: Susan M Deutsch (susanmdeutsch@gmail.com); Justin Rodgers;
Andrew Manshel
Subject: Follow-Up from Proposal Interview/Presentation
Mr. Newhouse,

We wanted to thank Mr. Peebles and your team for coming out to
Jamaica yesterday to discuss your proposal and answer some of
our questions.

As discussed in the meeting, please provide the following additional

information:
·         A press kit for Genesis Companies
·         An example of a KIMCO urban, multi-story retail projects
·         An updated proforma, including sources, uses and revised
purchase price

As we progress in the interview process we are looking to respond

back to teams with additional questions in the next couple of
weeks. Your prompt reply is appreciated.

Again, thank you for your continued interest and we look forward to
hearing from you.

Best regards,
Mikki

Mikki Columbus
Senior Project Manager, Planning and Development
Greater Jamaica Development Corporation
90-04 161st Street, 7th Floor
Jamaica, NY 11432
p: 718.291.0282 x146
f: 718.658.1405
ww.gjdc.org

Please consider our environment before printing

<2040 FDB - Simple Analysis As of Right.xlsx>

mhtml:file://C:\Users\Daniel\AppData\Roaming\CDTPL\Temp\e0db4095-cd66-4a7e-9c68... 11/7/2015