Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
2
During the early ages of between 1972 and 2000, its reported that almost more than half
of the population who happened to be aware of the wolves existence had a positive attitude
towards wolves .however a number of research done on the human feelings towards the creature
reveals that, its all dependent on a few more issues of which may include; period of animate
existence, one’s level of information, area of residence more specifically those residing on the
farmland, or even having inclination towards a given category of concern affecting human
A very few number of those who specifically were involved in the arming activities had a
positive attitude towards the wolf. This was due to the high risk of preying on the tamed animals.
Most farmers were involved in the livestock farming and the wolves were a danger to these kind
of farming, as such they bare did like the presence of wolves. Frequent growing concern of
among the people living in their permanent residential areas implies that the attitude from the
rural dwellers was adversely negative. Staying close to wolves for rural dwellers also meant that
the reduced opportunity to do hunting and even reduced safety of the people in general.1
1
Eriksson, Max. "Rurality and collective attitude effects on wolf policy." Sustainability 8,
Stauder, Julia, Filippo Favilli, Agnieszka Elzbieta Stawinoga, Andrea Omizzolo, and Thomas
Philipp Streifeneder. "The attitude of society to the return of the wolf in South Tyrol
Wolves are extensively found in the rural settings and as such they mainly tend to
influence rural life more than the city life. Nearness to these animals and direct knowledge of
them has been found to greatly culminate into a negative attitudes towards the wolves hence we
can conclude that due to urban and rural perfect latitudinal divide it can be said that the attitude
in the urban settings is way towards positive. It can also be noted that although the general feel
of the public towards wolves was positive, the area of residence really did influence this feeling.
Those who found themselves staying in the wolves dwelling places tend to be having more
negative attitude, while those who stayed away from wolves have been found to be more
positive.2
Bibliography
2
Wolf, Andrew MD, Elizabeth TH Fontham, Timothy R. Church, Christopher R. Flowers,
Carmen E. Guerra, Samuel J. LaMonte, Ruth Etzioni et al. "Colorectal cancer screening
for average‐risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society." CA: a
Vervaecke, Hilde, Heidi Arnouts, Lijske Vanheukelom, Peter Galbusera, and Joachim Mergeay.
"Attitudes towards the return of the wolf (canis lupus lupus) in Belgium." In 19th
Stauder, Julia, Filippo Favilli, Agnieszka Elzbieta Stawinoga, Andrea Omizzolo, and Thomas
Philipp Streifeneder. "The attitude of society to the return of the wolf in South Tyrol
Carmen E. Guerra, Samuel J. LaMonte, Ruth Etzioni et al. "Colorectal cancer screening
for average‐risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society." CA: a
Eriksson, Max. "Rurality and collective attitude effects on wolf policy." Sustainability 8, no. 8
(2016): 711.
Vervaecke, Hilde, Heidi Arnouts, Lijske Vanheukelom, Peter Galbusera, and Joachim Mergeay.
"Attitudes towards the return of the wolf (canis lupus lupus) in Belgium." In 19th
Torres, Rita Tinoco, Diana Lopes, Carlos Fonseca, and Luís Miguel Rosalino. "One rule does not
fit it all: patterns and drivers of stakeholders perspectives of the endangered Iberian
Stauder, Julia, Filippo Favilli, Agnieszka Elzbieta Stawinoga, Andrea Omizzolo, and Thomas
Philipp Streifeneder. "The attitude of society to the return of the wolf in South Tyrol