Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
IWA-9000 Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Figures
IWA-3310-1 Surface Planar Flaws Oriented in Plane Normal to Pressure Retaining Surface . . . . 26
IWA-3320-1 Subsurface Planar Flaws Oriented in Plane Normal to Pressure Retaining Surface . 27
IWA-3330-1 Multiple Planar Flaws Oriented in Plane Normal to Pressure Retaining Surface . . . 28
IWA-3340-1 Nonplanar Elliptical Subsurface Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
IWA-3350-1 Parallel Planar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
IWA-3360-1 Laminar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
11
ARTICLE IWA-1000
SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITY
11
IWA-1320 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-1600
classification that determines the applicable rules of (m) the retention and maintenance of all basic calibra-
this Division. tion blocks used for ultrasonic examination of the
(e) If systems safety criteria permit a system to be components;
nonnuclear safety Class and an Owner optionally classi- (n) documentation of a Quality Assurance Program
fies and constructs that system, or a portion thereof, in accordance with the following:
to Class 2 or Class 3 requirements, the application of (1) Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part
the rules of IWA-1320(a) is at the option of the Owner 50; or
and is not a requirement of this Division. (2) ASME NQA-1, Parts II and III, Basic Require-
ments and Supplements.
(o) recording of regions in ferritic steel components
IWA-1400 OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITY where acceptance standards have been modified as
required in IWB-3410.2;
The responsibilities of the Owner of the nuclear (p) recording of regions in components where flaws
power plant shall include the following:
or relevant conditions exceeding the acceptance stan-
(a) determination of the appropriate Code class(es) dards have been evaluated by analysis to allow continued
for each component1 of the plant, and identification of operation as permitted by IWB-3132.3, IWB-3142.4,
the system boundaries for each class of components
IWC-3122.3, IWC-3132.3, IWE-3122.3, IWF-3112.3,
subject to inspection and the components exempt from IWF-3122.3, and IWL-3212. Any continued operation
examination requirements; time or cycle limits inherent in the analysis shall also
(b) design and arrangement of system components
be recorded.
to include allowances for adequate access and clearances
for conduct of the examination and tests;
(c) preparation of plans, schedules, and inservice
IWA-1500 ACCESSIBILITY
inspection summary reports, and submittal of these
plans and reports to the enforcement and regulatory Provisions for accessibility shall include the following
authorities having jurisdiction at the plant site; considerations:2
(d) preparation of written examination instructions (a) access for the Inspector, examination personnel,
and procedures, including diagrams or system drawings and equipment necessary to conduct the examinations;
identifying the extent of areas of components subject (b) sufficient space for removal and storage of struc-
to examination; tural members, shielding, and insulation;
(e) verification of qualification to the required level (c) installation and support of handling machinery
of responsibility of personnel who perform the examina- (e.g., hoists) where required to facilitate removal, disas-
tions; sembly, and storage of equipment, components, and
(f) possession of an arrangement with an Authorized other materials;
Inspection Agency to provide inspection services; (d) performance of examinations alternative to those
(g) performance of required examinations and tests; specified in the event structural defects or indications are
(h) recording of examination and test results that revealed that may require such alternative examinations;
provide a basis for evaluation and facilitate comparison (e) performance of necessary operations associated
with the results of subsequent examinations; with repair /replacement activities.
(i) evaluation of examination and test results;
(j) performance of repair /replacement activities in
accordance with written programs and plans; IWA-1600 REFERENCED STANDARDS
(k) maintenance of adequate inspection, examination, AND SPECIFICATIONS
test, flaw evaluation, and repair /replacement activity
records such as radiographs, diagrams, drawings, calcu- When standards and specifications are referenced in
lations, examination and test data, description of proce- this Division, their revision date or indicator shall be
dures used, and evidence of personnel qualifications; as shown in Table IWA-1600-1.
(l) retention of all inspection, examination, test, and
repair /replacement activity records and flaw evaluation 2 Design considerations other than access provisions may be needed
calculations for the service lifetime of the component for specific system components to render inservice inspections practi-
or system; cal (such as surface finish of components subject to crud or corrosion
product buildup, material selection to minimize activation in service,
and shielding from irradiation effects).
1 Classification criteria are specified in 10 CFR 50.
12
TABLE IWA-1600-1 98
REFERENCED STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
ASTM D 95 1970
ASTM E 29 1967
13
14
licensed to write boiler and pressure vessel insurance meeting Table IWA-2210-1 is required. Measurements
in that Province; of the near-distance test chart shall be made once
(3) by an Inspector employed by other enforcement before initial use with an optical comparator (10X or
authorities in the United States or Canada having juris- greater) or other suitable instrument to verify that the
diction over the designated plant. height of a representative lower case character, for the
(b) The Authorized Inspection Agency, including its selected type size, meets the requirements of Table
staff of Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector Supervi- IWA-2210-1.
sors and the Inspectors, shall meet the requirements of (c) Remote examination may be substituted for direct
ASME QAI-1. examination. The remote examination procedure shall
(c) The Authorized Inspection Agency shall be ac- be demonstrated to resolve the selected test chart char-
credited by ASME in accordance with the provisions acters.
set forth in ASME QAI-1. (d) Alternatives to the direct visual examination dis-
tance requirements of Section V may be used as
specified in Table IWA-2210-1.
IWA-2130 ACCESS FOR INSPECTOR (e) It is not necessary to measure illumination levels
on each examination surface when the same portable
The Owner shall arrange for an Inspector to have light source or similar installed lighting equipment is
access to all parts of the plant as necessary to make demonstrated to provide the illumination specified in
the required inspections. The Owner shall keep the Table IWA-2210-1 at the maximum examination dis-
Inspector informed of the progress of the preparatory tance.
work necessary to permit inspections and shall notify (f) The adequacy of the illumination levels from
the Inspector at a time reasonably in advance of when battery powered portable lights shall be checked before
the components will be ready for inspection. and after each examination or series of examinations,
not to exceed 4 hr between checks. In lieu of using
a light meter, these checks may be made by verifying
IWA-2200 EXAMINATION METHODS that the illumination is adequate (i.e., no discernable
(a) The three types of examinations used during degradation in the visual examination resolution of the
inservice inspection are defined as visual, surface, and procedure demonstration test chart characters.
volumetric. The examination method to be used is
specified in Tables IWB-, IWC-, IWD-, IWE-, IWF-, IWA-2211 VT-1 Examination
and IWL-2500-1. If a component must be examined
in a high radiation area, remotely controlled equipment VT-1 examinations are conducted to detect disconti-
may be advisable. nuities and imperfections on the surfaces of components,
(b) When preparation of a surface for nondestructive including such conditions as cracks, wear, corrosion,
examination is required, the preparation shall be by a or erosion.
mechanical method. Such surfaces shall be blended
into the surrounding area as may be required to perform IWA-2212 VT-2 Examination
the examination. The wall thickness shall not be reduced
below the minimum thickness required by design. Non- (a) VT-2 examinations are conducted to detect evi-
mandatory Appendix D may be used for such surface dence of leakage from pressure retaining components,
preparation. with or without leakage collection systems, as required
during the conduct of system pressure test.
(b) VT-2 examinations shall be conducted in accord-
ance with IWA-5000. For direct examination, the Table
98 IWA-2210 VISUAL EXAMINATIONS
IWA-2210-1 maximum examination distance shall apply
Visual examinations shall be conducted in accordance to the distance from the eye to the surfaces being
with Table IWA-2210-1 of Section V, Article 9 and examined.
the following;
(a) A written procedure and report of examination
IWA-2213 VT-3 Examination
results is required.
(b) For procedure demonstration, a near-distance vi- VT-3 examinations are conducted to determine the
sion test chart containing text with lower case characters general mechanical and structural condition of compo-
without an ascender or descender (e.g., a, c, e, o) nents and their supports by verifying parameters such
15
IWA-2213 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-2233
Maximum Procedure
Minimum Maximum Direct Demonstration Lower
Visual Illumination, Examination Case Character Height,
Examination fc Distance, ft in.
VT-1 50 2 0.044
VT-2 15 6 0.158
VT-3 50 4 0.105
as clearances, settings, and physical displacements; and IWA-2222 Liquid Penetrant Examination
to detect discontinuities and imperfections, such as loss
Liquid penetrant examination shall be conducted in
of integrity at bolted or welded connections, loose or
accordance with Section V, Article 6.
missing parts, debris, corrosion, wear, or erosion. VT-
3 includes examinations for conditions that could affect
operability or functional adequacy of snubbers and IWA-2223 Eddy Current Examination
constant load and spring type supports.
Eddy current examination for detection of surface
flaws shall be conducted in accordance with Appen-
IWA-2215 Replication dix IV.
Surface replication methods may be used for VT-1
and VT-3 examinations when the surface resolution is
at least equivalent to that of direct visual observation. IWA-2230 VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATION
A volumetric examination indicates the presence of
IWA-2216 Remote Visual Examination discontinuities throughout the volume of material and
may be conducted from either the inside or outside
In addition to the requirements of Section V, Article surface of a component.
9, when remote visual examination is substituted for
direct visual examination, the remote visual examination
system shall have the capability of distinguishing and IWA-2231 Radiographic Examination
differentiating between the colors applicable to the
requirements of VT-1 and VT-3 for the component Radiographic techniques, employing penetrating radi-
examinations being conducted. ation such as X-rays, gamma rays, or thermalized
neutrons, may be utilized with appropriate image-re-
cording devices, such as photographic film or papers,
IWA-2220 SURFACE EXAMINATION electrostatic systems, direct-image orthicons, or image
converters. For radiographic examinations employing
(a) A surface examination indicates the presence of
either X-ray equipment or radioactive isotopes and
surface discontinuities. It may be conducted by a mag-
photographic films, the procedure shall be as specified
netic particle, a liquid penetrant, or an eddy current
in Article 2 of Section V.
method.
(b) Any linear indication that exceeds the allowable
linear surface flaw standards shall be recorded. IWA-2232 Ultrasonic Examination
Ultrasonic examination shall be conducted in accord-
IWA-2221 Magnetic Particle Examination ance with Appendix I.
(a) Magnetic particle examination shall be conducted
in accordance with Section V, Article 7.
IWA-2233 Eddy Current Examination
(b) Magnetic particle examination of coated materials
shall be conducted in accordance with Section V, Article Eddy current examination shall be conducted in
7, Appendix I. accordance with Section V, Article 8, Appendix II.
16
IWA-2240 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-2316
98 IWA-2312 NDE Methods Listed in ANSI /ASNT IWA-2316 Alternative Qualifications of VT-2 98
CP-189 Visual Examination Personnel
(a) Qualifications shall be based on the methods, (a) In lieu of the requirements of IWA-2310 through
techniques, procedures, and equipment used for the IWA-2314, VT-2 visual examination personnel may be
NDE required by this Division. qualified by satisfying the following requirements:
17
18
(1) Twenty to 40% of the questions shall cover tions and when recording data. These activities shall
fundamentals and principles of the method and shall be conducted under the guidance of Level II or Level
be similar to published ASNT Level III questions. III personnel. Level I personnel shall not evaluate or
(2) Thirty to 50% of the questions shall cover appli- accept the results of a nondestructive examination.
cations and establishment of procedures and techniques
and shall be similar to published ASNT Level III questions.
(3) Twenty to 30% of the questions shall cover IWA-2340 LEVEL III EDUCATION
the capability to interpret codes, standards, and specifi-
cations for the method. Level III candidates shall have high school or equiva-
(c) The Specific Examination shall contain at least lent education.
30 questions covering equipment, techniques, proce-
dures, and administration of the Employer’s written
practice. The Specific Examination shall also cover the IWA-2350 LIMITED CERTIFICATION 98
NDE requirements of this Division, including acceptance
standards and referenced codes and standards. Limited certification in a method is permitted for
(d) The Practical Examination shall be in accordance personnel who are restricted to performing examinations
with ANSI /ASNT CP-189 rules. of limited scope, i.e., limited operations or limited
(e) An ASNT Level III certificate with current en- techniques within the method. Topics that are not
dorsements obtained by examination for the applicable relevant to the limited certification may be deleted from
method satisfies the Basic and Method Examination the ANSI /ASNT CP-189, Appendix VI, or Appendix
requirements. VII training outline and may be accompanied by a
(f) When an outside agency administers the examina- corresponding reduction in training hours, examination
tion and only a pass or fail grade is issued, the Employer content, and number of examination questions. Only
shall assign a grade of 80% for a pass grade. questions related to the limited training are required.
(g) Level III personnel shall be recertified using the In addition, the required experience may be reduced
written Method, Specific, and Practical Examinations by a corresponding amount. The specific methods and
and the Demonstration Examination. Alternatively, techniques covered by limited certification and the
Level III personnel may be recertified using only the training, examination, and experience requirements for
written Method and Specific Examinations, provided limited certification shall be defined in the written
the following conditions are met: practice and documented in the individual’s certification
(1) The Level III candidate was previously certified records.
or recertified using all the written examinations and
the Demonstration Examination.
(2) The Level III candidate is not being recertified IWA-2360 LEVEL I AND LEVEL II
due to interrupted service as defined in the Employer’s TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE
written practice.
(a) A candidate may be qualified directly to Level
(3) The Level III candidate is not being certified
II with no time as a Level I provided the required
by a new Employer.
training and experience consists of the sum of the
(h) For initial certification, the grades for the Basic,
hours required for Level I and Level II certification.
Method, Specific, Practical, and Demonstration Exami-
(b) NDE training course outlines and materials shall
nations shall be averaged to determine the overall grade.
be approved by a Level III. Previous training and
For recertification, the grades of applicable examinations
experience may be accepted if verified by a Level III.
administered in accordance with IWA-2323(g) shall be
averaged to determine the overall grade. The method of verification shall be documented in the
(i) An ACCP certificate with current endorsements candidate’s certification records.
obtained by examination satisfies the Basic Method,
Practical, and Demonstration examination requirements
for Level III NDE personnel. IWA-2370 LEVEL III EXPERIENCE
Candidates for Level III certification shall meet one
of the following criteria:
IWA-2330 LEVEL I RESPONSIBILITIES
(a) Graduate of a 4-year accredited engineering or
Level I personnel shall use written procedures when science college or university with a degree in engi-
performing specific setups, calibrations, and examina- neering or science, plus 1 year experience in NDE in
19
an assignment comparable to that of a Level II in the (3) identification of drawings showing items which
examination method. require examination;
(b) Completion with a passing grade of at least the (4) list of examination procedures;
equivalent of 2 full years of engineering or science (5) description of alternative examinations and
study at a university, college, or technical school, plus identification of components to be examined using
2 years experience in an assignment comparable to that alternative methods;
of a Level II in the examination method. (6) identification of calibration blocks used for
(c) Four years experience in an assignment compara- ultrasonic examination of components.
ble to that of a Level II in the examination method.
NDE Instructors shall meet the requirements of Ap- Supporting documents necessary for inspection plan
pendix VII. and schedule implementation such as diagrams or system
drawings showing boundaries and system classifications,
procedures, specifications, and other documents required
for implementation of the inservice examinations and
IWA-2400 INSPECTION PROGRAM tests shall be available at the plant site.
20
(1) Each inspection interval may be reduced or coincide with a plant outage. This adjustment shall
extended by as much as one year. Adjustments shall not alter the requirements for scheduling inspection
not cause successive intervals to be altered by more intervals.
than one year from the original pattern of intervals. If (4) The inspection interval for which an examina-
an inspection interval is extended, neither the start and tion was performed shall be identified on examination
end dates nor the inservice inspection program for the records.
successive interval need be revised. (e) In addition to IWA-2430(c) and (d), for plants
(2) Examinations may be performed to satisfy the that are out of service continuously for 6 months or
more, the inspection interval during which the outage
requirements of the extended interval in conjunction
occurred may be extended for a period equivalent to
with examinations performed to satisfy the requirements
the outage and the original pattern of intervals extended
of the successive interval. However, an examination accordingly for successive intervals.
performed to satisfy requirements of either the extended (f) The inspection frequency for inservice testing of
interval or the successive interval shall not be credited pumps and valves shall be in accordance with the
to both intervals. requirements of IWP and IWV.
(3) That portion of an inspection interval described (g) The inspection intervals for items installed by
as an inspection period may be reduced or extended repair /replacement activities shall coincide with re-
by as much as one year to enable an inspection to maining intervals, as determined by the calendar years
20.1
of plant service at the time of the repair /replacement (e) Superseded Code Cases approved for use in
activities. accordance with IWA-2441(a) through (d) may continue
(h) The inspection program of IWA-2431 may be to be used.
replaced by the inspection program of IWA-2432, and (f) The use of any Code Case and revisions to
vice versa, during the first 3 years of the service lifetime previously approved Code Cases are subject to accept-
of the plant. ance by the regulatory and enforcement authorities
(i) The inspection intervals for inservice examination having jurisdiction at the plant site.
of heat exchanger tubing shall be in accordance with
the requirements of IWB-2413.
(j) The inspection intervals for inservice examination IWA-2442 Annulled Section XI Code Cases
of Class CC components shall be in accordance with
Code Cases approved for use in accordance with
the requirements of IWL-2400.
IWA-2441 may be used after annulment for the duration
of that Inspection Plan.
IWA-2431 Inspection Program A
The inspection intervals shall comply with the follow- IWA-2443 Code Cases for Other Sections
ing, except as may be modified by IWA-2430(c):
1st Inspection Interval — 3 years following initial start In the course of preparation.
of plant commercial service
2nd Inspection Interval — 7 years following the 1st
inspection interval IWA-2500 EXTENT OF EXAMINATION
3rd Inspection Interval — 13 years following the 2nd
inspection interval Requirements for examination of welds apply only to
4th Inspection Interval — 17 years following the 3rd welds joining items and not welds correcting flaws in base
inspection interval material (including core closure welds in casting), unless
Successive Inspection Intervals — follow IWA-2432 otherwise stated.
21
IWA-2640 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-2641
22
ARTICLE IWA-3000
STANDARDS FOR EXAMINATION EVALUATION
IWA-3100 EVALUATION be rounded to the nearest 0.1 in. (2 mm) or 1⁄16 in.
(1.6 mm), respectively.
(a) Evaluation shall be made of flaws detected during
an inservice examination as required by IWB-3000 for
Class 1 pressure retaining components, IWC-3000 for
Class 2 pressure retaining components, IWD-3000 for IWA-3300 FLAW CHARACTERIZATION
Class 3 pressure retaining components, IWE-3000 for
(a) Flaws detected by the preservice and inservice
Class MC pressure retaining components, or IWF-3000
examinations shall be sized by the bounding rectangle
for component supports.
or square for the purpose of description and dimen-
(b) If acceptance standards for a particular compo-
sioning. The dimensions of a flaw shall be determined
nent, Examination Category, or examination method
by the size of a rectangle or square that fully contains
are not specified in this Division, flaws that exceed the
the area of the flaw.
acceptance standards for materials and welds specified in
(1) The length ø of the rectangle or one side of
the Section III Edition applicable to the construction
the square shall be drawn parallel to the inside pressure
of the component shall be evaluated to determine
retaining surface of the component.
disposition. Such disposition shall be subject to review
(2) The depth of the rectangle or one side of the
by the regulatory and enforcement authorities having
square shall be drawn normal to the inside pressure
jurisdiction at the plant site.
retaining surface of the component and shall be denoted
as a for a surface flaw and 2a for a subsurface flaw.
(3) The aspect ratio of a flaw shall be defined by
IWA-3200 SIGNIFICANT DIGITS FOR a /ø. The flaw aspect ratio shall not exceed 0.5. (See
Fig. IWA-3320-1, Flaw #3, as an example.)
LIMITING VALUES
(b) Flaws shall be characterized in accordance with
(a) All observed or calculated values of dimensions IWA-3310 through IWA-3390, as applicable.
of component thickness and of flaws detected by nonde- (c) The clad thickness dimension may be taken from
structive examinations to be used for comparison with the manufacturer’s drawings.
the evaluation standards of IWB-3000, IWC-3000, IWD- (d) Flaws detected by the inservice examinations
3000, or IWE-3000, whether obtained as decimals or (IWB-2500) of steam generator tubing (Examination
converted from fractions, shall be expressed to the Category B-Q) shall be described as a percentage of
nearest 0.1 in. (2 mm) for values 1 in. (25 mm) and wall thickness. The depth is the maximum radial dimen-
greater, and to the nearest 0.05 in. (1.3 mm) for values sion of the flaw. The wall thickness t is the nominal
less than 1 in. (25 mm). Rounding-off of values shall wall thickness, and the tube radius r is the mean radius
be performed in accordance with the Rounding-off as given by the specification to which the tubes were
Method of ASTM Recommended Practice E 29 and purchased. These flaws shall be compared with the
Metric Practice Guide E 380. standards of IWB-3521.
(b) Interpolation of percentage values for acceptance
standards, as required for intermediate flaw aspect ratios
in the tables of allowable flaw standards, shall be
IWA-3310 SURFACE PLANAR FLAWS
rounded to the nearest 0.1%.
(c) Interpolation of decimal or fractional dimensions (a) A continuous indication shall be considered as
specified in the tables of allowable flaw standards shall a surface planar flaw if the detected area of the flaw
23
IWA-3310 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-3380
is oriented primarily in any single plane, other than (b) The rules of IWA-3310 and IWA-3320 shall be
parallel to the surface of the component, and any portion applied to characterize the projected areas of the flaws
of the flaw penetrates a surface of the component, as as surface or subsurface flaws, respectively.
shown in Fig. IWA-3310-1. (c) The dimensions a and ø of such flaws shall be
(b) A subsurface indication shall be considered a those of a rectangle that contains the projected area
surface flaw if any portion of the flaw is less than of the flaw as shown in Fig. IWA-3340-1.
0.4d from the surface of the component nearest the
flaw. If the nearest surface of the component is clad,
S shall be measured to the clad–base metal interface. IWA-3350 PARALLEL PLANAR FLAWS
S is measured as shown in Fig. IWA-3310-1. The
(a) Discontinuous indications whose areas are ori-
thickness of the cladding used to establish the clad–
ented primarily in parallel planes, and other than parallel
base metal interface may be the nominal clad thickness
to the surface of the component, shall be considered
specified on design drawings of the component.
single planar flaws if the adjacent planes are within a
distance S, where S is determined as shown in Fig.
IWA-3350-1.
IWA-3320 SUBSURFACE PLANAR FLAWS (b) The dimensions a and ø of such flaws shall be
A continuous indication shall be considered a subsur- those of the square or rectangle that contains the detected
face planar flaw if the detected area of the flaw is area of all flaws within the flaw–plane adjacency limits
oriented primarily in any single plane other than parallel of IWA-3350(a), as shown in Fig. IWA-3350-1.
to the surface of the component, and if the distance
S from the flaw to the nearest surface of the component
is as shown in Fig. IWA-3320-1. If the nearest surface IWA-3360 LAMINAR FLAWS
of the component is clad, S shall be measured to the (a) Planar indications oriented within 10 deg. of a
clad–base metal interface. The thickness of cladding plane parallel to the surface of the component shall
used to establish the clad–base metal interface may be be considered laminar flaws, except where noted other-
the nominal clad thickness specified on design drawings wise in referenced figures of IWB-3500.
of the component. (b) The area of a laminar flaw shall be 0.75 times
the area of the square or rectangle that contains the
detected area of those flaws that either overlap or are
IWA-3330 MULTIPLE PLANAR FLAWS within a distance S of 1 in. (25 mm) of one another
(a) Discontinuous indications shall be considered sin- as shown in Fig. IWA-3360-1.
gle planar flaws if the distance between adjacent flaws
is equal to or less than the dimension S, where S is
determined as shown in Fig. IWA-3330-1. IWA-3370 RADIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATION
(b) The rules of IWA-3310 and IWA-3320 shall be (a) An indication detected by radiographic examina-
applied to characterize multiple planar flaws as surface tion shall be considered to be a linear flaw unless
or subsurface planar flaws, respectively. the indication can be characterized as surface planar,
(c) The dimensions a and ø of such multiple planar subsurface planar, or laminar by supplemental exami-
flaws shall be those of the square or rectangle that nation.
contains the detected area of all flaws within the (b) The supplemental examination of IWA-3370(a)
proximity limits defined in IWA-3330(a). may be by additional radiography, ultrasonic examina-
tion, or other methods provided they comply with the
rules of IWA-2240.
IWA-3340 NONPLANAR FLAWS
(a) A continuous indication whose detected area is
IWA-3380 MULTIPLE NONALIGNED
not oriented in a single plane (such as two or more
COPLANAR FLAWS
intersecting inclined planes, curvilinear geometry, or
combinations of nonplanar geometry) shall be resolved (a) Discontinuous indications that are coplanar and
into two planar flaws by projection of the flaw area nonaligned in the through-wall direction of the section
into planes normal to the maximum principal stresses, thickness t, and with at least one indication characterized
as shown in Fig. IWA-3340-1. as a surface flaw, shall be considered single planar
24
IWA-3380 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-3400
surface flaws if the separation distances S1 and S2 that are aligned to reduce the net section thickness
between the individual flaws are equal to or less than may be treated as separate and individual planar flaws
the dimensions specified in Flaw #1 of Fig. IWA- if the following requirements are met.
3380-1. (1) The a dimensions for the flaw aspect ratio,
(b) The dimensions a and ø of the combined single a /ø of the individual flaws do not exceed the allowable
flaw of IWA-3380(a) shall be defined by the size of flaw standards for the respective Examination Category
the bounding square or rectangle that contains the applicable to the component.
individual nonaligned flaws as delineated in Fig. IWA- (2) The additive flaw depth dimensions within the
3380-1. bounding parallel planes shown in Fig. IWA-3390-1
(c) Discontinuous indications that are coplanar and are not in excess of the following limits:1
nonaligned in the through-wall direction of the section (a) two surface flaws (one a1 on the inner and
thickness and characterized as subsurface flaws shall the other a2 on the outer surface of the component),
be considered single planar subsurface flaws if the (a1+a2) ≤ (as+a′s) /2 within planes A–A′ and B–B′;
separation distances S1, S2, S3, and S4 are equal to or (b) two subsurface flaws, (a1+a2) ≤ (ae+a′e) /2
less than the dimensions specified in Flaw #2 of Fig. within planes C– C′ and D–D′;
IWA-3380-1. (c) two surface and one subsurface flaws:
(d) The dimensions a and ø of the combined single (1) (a1+a3) ≤ (as+ae) /2 within planes E–E′
flaw of IWA-3380(c) shall be defined by the size of and F–F′
the bounding square or rectangle that contains the (2) (a1+a2+a3) ≤ (as+ ae+a′s) /3 within planes
individual nonaligned flaws as delineated in Fig. IWA- F–F′ and G–G′
3380-1. (3) (a2+a3) ≤ (a′s+ae) /2 within planes G–G′
(e) Flaw interaction within a group containing a and H–H′
greater number of individual flaws than shown in Fig.
IWA-3380-1 shall be governed by the same criterion
of IWA-3380(a) or (c). However, in all cases, the initial IWA-3400 LINEAR FLAWS DETECTED BY
characterization of flaw interactions shall not require SURFACE OR VOLUMETRIC
a recharacterization even if the bounding square or EXAMINATIONS
rectangle reduces the separation distance S to another (a) Linear flaws detected by surface (PT /MT) or
adjoining flaw to within the flaw interaction distance. volumetric (RT) examination methods shall be consid-
ered single linear surface flaws provided the separation
distance between flaws is equal to or less than the
IWA-3390 MULTIPLE ALIGNED SEPARATE dimension S, where S is determined as shown in Fig.
FLAWS IWA-3400-1.
(b) The overall length ø of a single and discontinuous
(a) Discontinuous flaws, as shown in Fig. IWA- linear flaw shall be determined as shown in Fig. IWA-
3390-1, that are coplanar in the through-wall direction 3400-1.
of the section thickness, that are located within two
parallel planes 1⁄2 in. (13 mm) apart (i.e., normal to 1 The flaw depth dimensions as and ae are the allowable flaw
the pressure retaining surface of the component), and standards for surface and subsurface flaws, respectively.
25
Fig. IWA-3310-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
26
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Fig. IWA-3320-1
27
Fig. IWA-3330-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
28
29
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
30
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
31
Fig. IWA-3380-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
32
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Fig. IWA-3390-1
33
Fig. IWA-3400-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
34
ARTICLE IWA-4000
REPAIR /REPLACEMENT ACTIVITIES
IWA-4100 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1400(a) as Code Class 1, 2, 3, MC, or CC, and their
associated supports.
A99 IWA-4110 SCOPE
(b) The requirements of this Article do not apply
(a) The requirements of this Article apply regardless to the following, except as provided in IWA-4120(c)
of the reason for the repair /replacement activity1 or through (g):
the method that detected the condition requiring the (1) valve operators, controllers, position indicators,
repair /replacement activity. pump impellers, pump drivers, or other accessories and
(b) This Article provides requirements for repair / devices unless they have been classified as Code Class
replacement activities1 associated with pressure re- 1, 2, or 3 pressure retaining items in accordance with
taining components and their supports, including appur- IWA-1320;
tenances, subassemblies, parts of a component, core (2) instruments or permanently-sealed, fluid-filled
support structures, metal containments and their integral tubing systems furnished with instruments, but do apply
attachments, and metallic portions of Class CC contain- to instrument, control, and sampling piping when classi-
ments and their integral attachments. Repair /replace- fied as Code Class 1, 2, or 3 in accordance with
ment activities include welding, brazing, defect removal, IWA-1320;
and removing, adding, and modifying items or systems. (3) rupture disk material (the requirements of this
These requirements are applicable to procurement, de- Article do apply to the portion of a rupture disk holder
sign, installation, examination, and pressure testing of that forms the pressure boundary);
items within the scope of this Division. (4) orifice plates not exceeding 1⁄2 in. nominal
(c) This Article provides requirements for repair / thickness that are used only in flow-measuring service;
replacement activities performed on concrete contain- (5) other than component supports or core supports,
ments and post-tensioning system items for concrete material that is not associated with the pressure retaining
containments as specified in IWL-4000. function of a component, such as shafts, stems, trim,
spray nozzles, bearings, bushings, springs, wear plates,
IWA-4120 Applicability seals, packing, gaskets, valve seats, and ceramic insulat-
ing material and special alloys used as seal material
(a) The requirements of this Article apply to items in electrical penetration assemblies;
classified by the Owner in accordance with IWA- (6) component support items such as gaskets, seals,
bushing, springs, compression spring end plates, bear-
1 The term repair /replacement activity includes those activities pre- ings, retaining rings, washers, wear shoes, shims, slide
viously known as repair, replacement, modification, or alteration.
Those previous terms no longer have a unique meaning or significance plates, and hydraulic fluids. Requirements, if any, for
and are combined in the term repair /replacement activity. Reasons these items shall be stated in the Owner’s Requirements.
for repair /replacement activities may include the following: (c) When repair /replacement activities are performed
(a) discrepancies detected during inservice inspection, maintenance,
or service on items identified in IWA-4120(b), the Owner shall
(b) regulatory requirements change determine if installation of these items affects any
(c) design changes to improve equipment service inspection or test required by IWA-4530.
(d) changes to improve reliability
(e) damage (d) If items in IWA-4120(b)(6) are replaced in snub-
(f ) failure during service bers, the snubbers shall be examined and tested in
(g) personnel exposure accordance with IWA-4530.
(h) economics
(i) end of service life (e) If items identified in IWA-4120(b) require weld-
(j) addition of new items or systems ing to the pressure retaining portion of a component
35
or to a component support such installation shall comply (b) Repair /replacement activities shall be performed
with the requirements of this Article. and documented in accordance with the requirements
(f) Applicable Construction Code requirements, such of IWA-4142 and the technical requirements of IWA-
as design requirements for Class 1 valve stems, Owner 4400 and IWA-4520. A Repair /Replacement Plan, pres-
responsibilities for assuring adequacy of intervening sure testing, services of an Authorized Inspection
elements in the component support load path, and Agency, and completion of NIS-2 forms are not re-
nondestructive examination of springs for Class 1 com- quired.
ponent supports, shall be met for items identified in (c) If an item to be subjected to a repair /replacement
IWA-4120(b). activity does not satisfy the requirements of this Divi-
(g) Appendix J provides guidance in determining sion, the evaluation and corrective provisions of IWA-
applicability of this Article. 4160 apply.
(d) The tests of IWA-4530(b), (c), or (d) shall
be performed for repair /replacement activities of affect-
ing pump, valve, or snubber performance parameters.
IWA-4130 ALTERNATIVE REQUIREMENTS (e) Use of these alternative requirements, including
specifying the size of Class 1 items to which
IWA-4131 Small Items these requirements will be applied, shall be docu-
IWA-4131.1 Applicability. When repair /replacement mented by the Owner in the Repair/Replacement
activities involve the following items, the alternative program.
requirements of IWA-4131.2 may be used.
(a) Class 1 piping, tubing (except heat exchanger
tubing, and sleeves and welded plugs used for heat IWA-4132 Items Rotated From Stock
exchanger tubing), valves, fittings, and associated
supports, no larger than the smaller of (1) or (2) For snubbers and pressure relief valves rotated from
below: stock and installed on components (including piping
(1) NPS 1 (DN25); or systems), the following requirements may be used in
(2) the size and design such that, in the event lieu of those of IWA-4000, provided the rotation is
of postulated failure during normal plant operating only for testing the removed items:
conditions, the reactor can be shut down and cooled (a) Items being removed and installed shall be of
in an orderly manner, assuming makeup is provided the same design and construction.
by normal reactor coolant makeup systems operable (b) Items being removed shall have no evidence of
from on-site emergency power. failure at the time of removal.
(b) Class 2 and 3 piping, tubing (except heat ex- (c) Items being rotated shall be removed and installed
changer tubing, and sleeves and welded plugs used for only by mechanical means.
heat exchanger tubing), valves, and fittings, NPS 1 (d) Items being installed shall previously have been
(DN25) and smaller, and associated supports. in service.
(e) Preservice inspections and pressure tests shall be
IWA-4131.2 Requirements. For repair /replacement performed as required by IWA-4500.
activities involving items identified in IWA-4131.1, the (f) The Owner shall track the items to ensure trace-
following requirements may be used in lieu of those ability of inservice inspection and testing records.
of IWA-4000. (g) Use of an NIS-2 form is not required.
(a) Items shall be procured in accordance with the (h) Testing of removed snubbers and pressure relief
requirements of IWA-4142 and the technical require- valves, including required sample expansions, shall
ments of IWA-4200. For Section III items, the require- be performed in accordance with Subsections IWF
ments of NA-3700 or NCA-3800 need not be met, and IWV.
provided the Owner’s Quality Assurance Program
provides measures to assure that material is furnished
in accordance with the material specification and
IWA-4133 Mechanical Clamping Devices Used as
the applicable material requirements of Section III. A
Piping Pressure Boundary
Repair /Replacement Plan, possession of a Certifi-
cate of Authorization, and an agreement with an Author- Mechanical clamping devices used to replace piping
ized Inspection Agency are not required for the pressure boundary shall meet the requirements of Ap-
organization constructing or fabricating these items. pendix IX.
36
37
IWA-4150 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-4221
and, when required by IWA-2600, requirements for Requirements, and this Article, be maintained by the
reference points Owner, as applicable:
(c) the applicable weld procedure, heat treat- (1) Design Specification
ment, nondestructive examination, tests, and material (2) Design Report
requirements (3) Overpressure Protection Report
(d) the applicable examination, test, and accept- (4) Manufacturer’s Data Report
ance criteria to be used to verify acceptability (5) Material Certification
(4) description of the repair/replacement activities (6) Evaluation required by IWA-4160 or IWA-
to be performed; 4311
(5) intended life of the item after completion of (7) Repair /Replacement Program and Plans
the repair /replacement activity, when less than the (8) Report of Reconciliation
remainder of the previous design life of the item; (c) Revisions or updates to existing reports, records,
(6) whether application of the ASME Code Symbol and specifications shall be traceable to and from the
Stamp is required in accordance with IWA-4143; original record or report to provide a record of the
(7) documentation in accordance with IWA-4180 current status of the item. The review and certification
and IWA-6000. requirements for these revisions or updates shall be in
(d) The Repair /Replacement Program, Plans, and accordance with the Owner’s Requirements and the
evaluations required by IWA-4160 shall be subject to Construction Code.
review by enforcement and regulatory authorities having (d) Form NIS-2 shall be completed for all repair /
jurisdiction at the plant site. replacement activities.
38
IWA-4221 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4224.3
earliest Construction Code used for other systems that requirements of the earlier Construction Code are recon-
perform a similar function. ciled.
(c) As an alternative to (b) above, the item may
meet all or portions of the requirements of different
Editions and Addenda of the Construction Code, or
Section III when the Construction Code was not Section IWA-4224 Reconciliation of Material
III, provided the requirements of IWA-4222 through IWA-4224.1 Identical Material Procured to a Later
IWA-4226, as applicable, are met. Construction Code Edition or Addenda of the Construction Code, Sec-
Cases may also be used. A Report of Reconciliation, tion III, or Material Specification
if required, shall be prepared. All or portions of later (a) Materials, including welding materials, may meet
different Construction Codes may be used as listed the requirements of later dates of issue of the material
below: specification and later Editions and Addenda of the
(1) Piping, piping subassemblies, and their sup- same Construction Code or Section III when the Con-
ports: B31.1 to B31.7 to Section III. struction Code was not Section III, provided the materi-
(2) Pumps, valves, and their supports: from B31.1 als are the same specification, grade, type, class, or
to Draft Code for Pumps and Valves for Nuclear Power alloy, and heat-treated condition, as applicable.
to Section III. (b) Differences in the specified material tensile and
(3) Vessels and their supports: Section VIII to yield strength shall be compared and evaluated. If the
Section III. replacement material has a lower strength, a comparison
(4) Atmospheric and 0-15 psig (0–103 kPa) storage shall be made of the allowable stresses. If the tensile
tanks and their supports: Section VIII, API 620, or or yield strength is reduced and allowable stresses are
API 650 to Section III. reduced, the effect of the reduction on the design shall
be reconciled. For welding materials, any reduction in
specified tensile strength shall be evaluated to ensure
IWA-4222 Reconciliation of Code and Owner’s that the strength of the filler metal meets or exceeds
Requirements the strength of the base materials.
(a) Code Requirements and Owner’s Requirements
may be technical or administrative. IWA-4224.2 Identical Material Procured to an
(1) Only technical requirements that could affect Earlier Construction Code Edition or Addenda or
materials, design, fabrication, or examination, and affect Material Specification
the pressure boundary, or core support or component (a) Materials, including welding materials, may meet
support function, need to be reconciled. the requirements of earlier dates of issue of the material
(2) Administrative requirements, i.e., those that do specification and earlier Editions and Addenda of the
not affect the pressure boundary or core support or same Construction Code, provided the materials are
component support function, need not be reconciled. the same specification, grade, type, class, or alloy, and
Examples of such requirements include quality assur- heat-treated condition, as applicable.
ance, certification, Code Symbol Stamping, Data Re- (b) Differences in the specified material tensile and
ports, and Authorized Inspection. yield strength shall be compared and evaluated. If the
(b) The administrative requirements of either the replacement material has a lower strength, a comparison
Construction Code of the item being replaced or the shall be made of the allowable stresses. If the tensile
Construction Code of the item to be used for replacement or yield strength is lower and allowable stresses are
shall be met. lower, the effect of the reduction on the design shall
be reconciled. For welding materials, a lower specified
tensile strength shall be evaluated to ensure that the
A99 IWA-4223 Reconciliation of Components strength of the filler metal meets or exceeds the strength
of the base materials.
(a) Reconciliation of later Editions or Addenda of (c) Material examination and testing requirements
the Construction Codes or alternative Codes as permitted from the Construction Code of the component shall
by IWA-4221 is not required. The Owner shall evaluate be met.
any changes in weight, configuration, or pressure-tem-
perature rating in accordance with IWA-4311. IWA-4224.3 Use of a Different Material
(b) An earlier Edition and Addenda of the same (a) Use of materials of a specification, grade, type,
Construction Code may be used, provided all technical class, or alloy, and heat-treated condition, other than
39
that originally specified, shall be evaluated for suitability beyond the design-related issues defined in IWA-4223,
for the specified design and operating conditions in IWA-4224, and IWA-4225, shall be performed.
accordance with IWA-4311. (a) Material, fabrication, and examination require-
(b) Material examination and testing requirements ments (e.g., NX-2000, NX-4000, and NX-5000 of Sec-
shall be reconciled to the Construction Code require- tion III) shall be reviewed to reconcile the details
ments of the component. applicable to design with the design of the replace-
ment item.
IWA-4224.4 Substitution of Material Specifications
(b) All requirements related to the later portions shall
(a) When an SA or SB Specification is identified
be met, or any differences between the later design
as being identical, or identical except for editorial
provisions and the previous design shall be reconciled.
differences, to the corresponding ASTM A or B Specifi-
cation, either specification may be used.
(b) When an SFA Specification is identified as being IWA-4300 DESIGN
identical, or identical except for editorial differences,
to the corresponding AWS specification, either specifi- IWA-4310 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
cation may be used. IWA-4311 Material, Design, or Configuration
Changes
IWA-4225 Reconciliation of Parts, When a change is made to the design or configuration
Appurtenances, and Piping of an item or system, including material substitution,
Subassemblies the change shall meet the following requirements:
(a) Parts, appurtenances, and piping subassemblies (a) When an analysis is available, the change shall
may be fabricated to later Editions and Addenda of be evaluated to determine if a reanalysis is required.
the Construction Code and later different Construction If no reanalysis is performed, an evaluation shall be
Codes, as permitted by IWA-4221(b), provided materials performed and documented. The evaluation or reanalysis
are reconciled in accordance with IWA-4224. The shall document that the proposed change meets the
Owner shall evaluate any changes in weight, configura- Owner’s Requirements, and the Construction Code or
tion, or pressure-temperature rating in accordance with alternative provisions of this Division. The evaluation
IWA-4311. or reanalysis shall be traceable in accordance with
(b) An earlier Edition and Addenda of the same IWA-4180(c).
Construction Code may be used, provided all technical (b) When an analysis is unavailable (e.g., proprietary
requirements of the original Construction Code of the design, standard B16.5 flanges or fittings, standard
component being replaced are met, except as permitted B16.34 valve), an evaluation or a new analysis shall
by IWA-4224. Failure to meet the technical requirements be performed to document that the proposed change
of the original Construction Code may not be accepted meets the Owner’s Requirements and the Construction
by reconciliation. Code or alternative provisions of this Division. The
evaluation or new analysis shall be maintained in the
same manner as a Design Report in accordance with
IWA-4226 Reconciliation of Design Requirements IWA-4180(b) and IWA-4311(a).
IWA-4226.1 Design to All Requirements of a Later (c) Analyses shall be reviewed and certified in ac-
Edition or Addenda of the Construction Code. When cordance with the requirements of the Construction
an item is designed to all requirements of a later Code and Owner’s Requirements. Evaluations shall be
Edition or Addenda of the Construction Code, or Section certified as required for analyses.
III when the Construction Code was not Section III, (d) For any design or configuration change that devi-
reconciliation beyond the design-related issues defined ates from the Owner’s Requirements, Design Specifica-
in IWA-4223, IWA-4224, and IWA-4225 is not re- tion, or Design Report, the affected documents shall
quired. be revised or updated in accordance with IWA-4180(c).
A99
IWA-4226.2 Design to Portions of the Require-
ments of a Later Edition or Addenda of the Construc- IWA-4320 PIPING
tion Code. When an item is designed to portions of
IWA-4321 Class 1 Mechanical Joints
the requirements of a later Edition or Addenda of the
Construction Code, or Section III when the Construction (a) Flanged joints may be used in Class 1 piping
Code was not Section III, the following reconciliation systems.
40
(b) Expanded joints shall not be used in Class 1 as practical to the original nameplate. This nameplate
piping systems. shall contain the revised ratings and a reference to the
(c) Threaded joints in which the threads provide the rerating documentation.
only seal shall not be used in Class 1 piping systems. (f) An ASME Certificate of Authorization is not
If a seal weld is employed as the sealing medium, the required.
stress analysis of the joint shall include the stresses in
the weld resulting from the relative deflections of the
mated parts. IWA-4332 Flaw Evaluation A99
(d) Flared, flareless, and compression-type tubing Inservice flaws that were previously evaluated and
fittings may be used for tubing sizes not exceeding 1 accepted by the analytical evaluation provisions of
in. O.D. within the limitations of applicable standards IWB-3000, IWC-3000, or IWE-3000, or known wall
and requirements of IWA-4321(d)(2) and (3). In the thinning, shall be evaluated or analyzed in accordance
absence of such standards or specifications, the Owner with IWA-4311.
shall determine that the type of fitting selected is
adequate and safe for the Design Conditions in accord-
ance with the following requirements. IWA-4333 Examination A99
(1) The fitting pressure-temperature ratings shall
be reconciled with the specified design and operating If rerating results in a design condition for which the
conditions. Construction Code or Owner’s Requirements requires a
(2) Fittings and their joints shall be suitable for different examination than was originally performed,
the tubing with which they are to be used, in accordance that examination shall be performed.
with the minimum wall thickness of the tubing and
method of assembly recommended by the manufacturer.
(3) Fittings shall not be used in services that IWA-4334 Pressure Test Requirements A99
exceed the manufacturer’s maximum pressure-tempera- Rerated items shall be subjected to a system leakage
ture recommendations. test in accordance with IWA-5000 for the new service
condition if the resulting test pressure would be higher
than the pressure of previous pressure tests.
A99 IWA-4330 RERATING
The provisions of this paragraph shall apply for
rerating whether or not there is accompanying physi- IWA-4400 WELDING, BRAZING, DEFECT A99
cal work. REMOVAL, AND
INSTALLATION
A99 IWA-4331 General Requirements IWA-4410 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A99
(a) The applicable design requirements of the Con- (a) Welding, brazing, defect removal, and installation
struction Code and Owner’s Requirements shall be met. activities shall be performed in accordance with IWA-
Later Editions and Addenda of the Construction Code 4420 or IWA-4430, and the other requirements of this
or a later, different Construction Code, either in its Subarticle, except that the requirements of IWA-4700
entirety or portions thereof, and Code Cases may be shall be used for heat exchanger tube plugging or
used, provided the requirements of IWA-4221 are met. sleeving.
(b) Overpressure protection shall be evaluated in (b) Welding electrodes, flux, and other welding mate-
accordance with the Construction Code and Owner’s rial shall be stored and handled in accordance with a
Requirements. written procedure. Absorption of moisture by fluxes
(c) The rerating shall be evaluated or analyzed in and cored, fabricated, or coated electrodes shall be
accordance with IWA-4311. The Owner’s Requirements minimized. When electrode storage and baking condi-
shall be reviewed and revised or updated when nec- tions are not specified by this Division, the precautions
essary. and recommendations of the electrode manufacturer
(d) Form NIS-2 shall be completed for the rerating. shall be followed. Alternative welding material control
(e) If a nameplate with pressure or temperature rating procedures may be used if accepted by the Inspector.
is attached to the item or piping system, the Owner (c) Procedures for welding material control shall be
or his designee shall attach a new nameplate as close included in the Repair /Replacement Program.
41
42
IWA-4440 WELDING AND WELDER welders at the discretion of the Repair /Replacement
QUALIFICATION (INCLUDING Organization;
WELDING OPERATORS) (3) evidence that the Quality Assurance Program is
acceptable to the Owner’s Authorized Nuclear Inservice
(a) All welding shall be performed in accordance
Inspector.
with Welding Procedure Specifications that have been
qualified by the Owner or Repair /Replacement Organi-
zation in accordance with the requirements of the codes
IWA-4450 MECHANICAL INSTALLATION
specified in the Repair /Replacement Plan.
(b) As an alternative to QW-201, a procedure qualifi- Fittings shall be installed in accordance with the
cation record (PQR) qualified by one Owner may be manufacturer’s recommendations.
used by another Owner. When this alternative is used,
the following requirements shall be met:
IWA-4451 Helical-Coil Threaded Inserts
(1) The Owner who performed the procedure quali-
fication test shall certify, by signing the PQR, that IWA-4451.1 Class 1, 2, and 3. Internal threads in
testing was performed in accordance with Section IX. pressure-retaining items may be replaced with helical-
(2) The Owner who performed the procedure quali- coil threaded inserts in accordance with the following
fication test shall certify, in writing, that the procedure requirements.
qualification was conducted in accordance with a Quality (a) The helical-coil threaded insert shall satisfy the
Assurance Program that satisfies the requirements of design requirements of the Construction Code for the
IWA-1400. specified loading to be applied to the threaded connec-
(3) The Owner accepting the completed PQR shall tion. For materials not listed in the Construction Code,
be responsible for obtaining any additional supporting primary stresses shall not exceed the lesser of 2⁄3 of
information needed for WPS development. the minimum specified yield strength or 1⁄4 of the
(4) The Owner accepting the completed PQR shall minimum specified tensile strength of the applicable
document, on each resulting WPS, the parameters appli- material.
cable to welding. Each WPS shall be supported by all (b) The supplier shall be evaluated for compliance
with NCA-3800 or 10CFR50, Appendix B.
necessary PQRs.
(c) Helical-coil threaded inserts shall be supplied
(5) The Owner accepting the completed PQR shall
with a Certified Material Test Report that provides
accept responsibility for the PQR by documenting the
traceability to the item, material specification, grade or
Owner’s approval of each WPS that references the PQR.
class, mechanical properties, and heat-treated condition.
(6) The Owner accepting the completed PQR shall
(d) Helical-coil threaded inserts shall be installed in
demonstrate technical competence in application of the accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
received PQR by completing a performance qualification
using the parameters of a resulting WPS.
(7) The Owner may accept and use a PQR only
IWA-4460 METAL REMOVAL PROCESSES
when it is received directly from the Owner that certified
the PQR. IWA-4461 Thermal Removal Processes
(c) All welders shall be qualified by the Repair / Thermal removal processes include oxyacetylene cut-
Replacement Organization in accordance with the ting, carbon arc gouging, plasma cutting, metal disinte-
requirements of the codes specified in the gration machining (MDM), and electrodischarge ma-
Repair /Replacement Plan. chining (EDM).
(d) Welders need not be employed directly by the
Repair /Replacement Organization, provided the use of IWA-4461.1 P-No.1. When thermal removal pro-
such welders is controlled by the Quality Assurance cesses are used on P-No. 1 materials, surface oxides
Program of the Repair /Replacement Organization. This shall be removed by mechanical processing prior to
Program shall include the following: welding on cut surfaces.
(1) requirements for complete and exclusive ad- IWA-4461.2 P-Nos. 3, 4, 5A, 5B, 5C, 6, 7, 9A, A99
ministration and technical supervision of all welders 9B, 9C, 10A, 10B, 10C, 10E Through 10K, and 11A
by the Repair /Replacement Organization; Materials
(2) requirements for contractual control that pro- (a) When preheat is less than that specified in Table
vides the necessary authority to assign and remove IWA-4461.1-1, material shall be removed by a mechani-
43
P-Nos. 10A,
P-No. 4 and P-Nos. 5A, 10B, 10C, and
P-No. 1 P-No. 1 (Group 3), P-Nos. 9A, 5B, 5C, and 10E Through
(Groups 1 and 2) P-No. 3, and P-No. 11A 9B, and 9C P-No. 6 P-No. 7 10K
200 [Note (1)] 200 250 300 None 200 [Note (1)]
required
NOTE:
(1) Applies only to material with a nominal section thickness of 3⁄4 in. and greater.
cal method from all thermally processed areas, in etched with a suitable etchant, and visually examined
accordance with the following: at 10X. All sectioned surfaces shall be free of cracks.
(1) When welding is to be performed, at least (e) Corrosion testing of the thermally cut surface
1/32 in. of material shall be removed from the cavity and heat affected zone shall be performed if the cut
to be welded. surface is to be exposed to corrosive media. Alterna-
(2) When welding is not to be performed, at least tively, corrosion resistance of the thermally cut surface
1⁄ in. of material shall be removed and the area shall may be evaluated. The Owner shall specify the accept-
16
be faired into the surrounding area. ance criteria.
(3) Resulting irregularities shall be removed to a
smooth surface by a mechanical method. This surface
shall show no visual evidence of irregularities. The IWA-4462 Mechanical Removal Processes
depth of material to be removed as required by IWA- (a) If a mechanical removal process is used in an
4461.2(a)(1) or (2) shall be measured from the smooth area where welding is not to be performed, the area
surface. shall be faired into surrounding area.
(b) When preheat is applied in accordance with Table (b) Where welding is to be performed, the cavity
IWA-4461.1-1, material shall be removed to bright shall be ground smooth and clean with beveled sides
metal by a mechanical method. and edges rounded to provide suitable accessibility for
IWA-4461.3 P-Nos. 8 and 43 Materials. If thermal welding.
removal processes are used on P-No. 8 and P-No. 43
materials, at least 1⁄16 in. (1.6 mm) of material shall
be mechanically removed from the thermally pro- IWA-4500 EXAMINATION AND TEST
cessed area. IWA-4510 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
IWA-4461.4 Alternative to Mechanical Processing. (In course of preparation.)
Mechanical processing of thermally cut surfaces for
materials identified in IWA-4461.2 and IWA-4461.3 is
not required when using a thermal metal removal
IWA-4520 EXAMINATION
process qualified as follows:
(a) The qualification test shall consist of two coupons (a) Welding or brazing areas and welded joints made
of the same P-No. material to be cut in production. for installation of items shall be examined in accordance
(b) The qualification coupons shall be cut using the with the Construction Code identified in the Repair /
maximum heat input to be used in production. Replacement Plan.
(c) The thermally cut surface of each coupon shall (b) These examinations may be performed concur-
be visually examined at 10X and shall be free of rently with the preservice inspections required by
cracks. The Owner shall specify surface roughness IWA-4530.
acceptable for the application and shall verify that the (c) Alternative examination methods, a combination
qualification coupon meets that criterion. of methods, or newly developed techniques may be
(d) Each qualification coupon shall be cross sec- substituted for the methods specified in the Construction
tioned, and the exposed surfaces shall be polished, Code or in this Division, provided the Inspector is
44
satisfied that the results are demonstrated to be equiva- (4) flange seating surface when less than half the
lent or superior to those of the specified method. flange axial thickness is removed and replaced
(5) pressure vessel welding when the remaining
wall thickness, after metal removal, is at least 90% of
the minimum design wall thickness
IWA-4530 PRESERVICE INSPECTION AND
(6) components or connections NPS3 1 and smaller
TESTING
(7) tube-to-tubesheet welds when such welds are
(a) When portions of items requiring preservice or made on the cladding
inservice inspection are affected by repair /replacement (8) seal welds
activities, or for items being installed, including welded (9) welded joints between non-pressure-retaining
joints made for installation of items, preservice inspec- items and the pressure-retaining portion of the compo-
tions shall be performed in accordance with IWB-2200, nents
IWC-2200, IWD-2200, IWE-2200, IWF-2200, or IWL- (10) valve discs or seats, except as required by
2200 prior to return of the system to service. The IWA-4530(b)
preservice inspection may be performed either prior to
or following the pressure test required by IWA-4540.
(b) Prior to returning a valve to service, a preservice
test shall be performed in accordance with IWV-1000
when the Owner determines that the repair /replacement
activity affects its performance parameters. IWA-4550 CLASS MC AND METALLIC
(c) During the first inservice test performed after a PORTIONS OF CLASS CC
pump is put into service, a new set of reference values CONTAINMENTS
shall be determined in accordance with IWP-1000 when Items subjected to repair /replacement activities shall
the Owner determines that the repair /replacement activ-
be tested in accordance with IWE-5000.
ity affects its performance parameters.
(d) For repair /replacement activities on a snubber,
preservice examinations and tests shall be performed
in accordance with IWF-5200, prior to returning the
snubber to service.
IWA-4600 ALTERNATIVE WELDING
METHODS
A99 IWA-4540 PRESSURE TESTING OF CLASS 1,
(a) When welding under water, the alternative re-
2, AND 3 ITEMS
quirements of IWA-4660 may be used in lieu of the
(a) Unless exempted by (b) below, repair/replacement welding and nondestructive examination requirements
activities performed by welding or brazing on a pressure- of the Construction Code or Section III.
retaining boundary shall include (a)(1) or (a)(2) below. (b) When postweld heat treatment is not to be per-
(1) A system hydrostatic test shall be performed formed, the following provisions may be used.
in accordance with IWA-5000 prior to, or as part of, (1) The welding methods of IWA-4620, IWA-
returning to service. 4630, or IWA-4640 may be used in lieu of the welding
(2) The following requirements shall be met. and nondestructive examination requirements of the
(a) The nondestructive examination methodol- Construction Code or Section III, provided the require-
ogy and acceptance criteria of the 1992 Edition or later ments of IWA-4610 are met.
of Section III shall be met prior to return to service. (2) For welding of Class MC metal containments
(b) The Owner’s Requirements shall be met and their integral attachments and metallic liners of
prior to return to service. Class CC containments and their integral attachments,
(c) A system leakage test shall be performed the welding methods of IWA-4620 or IWA-4650 may be
in accordance with IWA-5000. used, provided the requirements of IWA-4610 are met.
(b) The following are exempt from any pressure test:
(1) cladding
(2) heat exchanger tube plugging and sleeving 3 NPS (Nominal Pipe Size) — a designation assigned for the purpose
(3) piping, pump, and valve welding or brazing of convenient specification of pipe size. The actual inside and outside
that does not penetrate through the pressure boundary dimensions are listed in applicable ANSI Standards.
45
IWA-4610 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR the Owner’s Requirements and either the Construction
ALL MATERIALS Code or Section III.
(b) The original defect shall be removed:
(a) The area to be welded plus a band around the
(1) when welding is to be performed in accordance
area of at least 1-1⁄2 times the component thickness or
with IWA-4620; or
5 in. (127 mm), whichever is less, shall be preheated
(2) when welding is required in accordance with
and maintained at a minimum temperature of 350°F IWA-4630 or IWA-4640, and the defect penetrates the
(177°C) for the SMAW process and 300°F (149°F) for base material.
the GTAW process during welding. The maximum (c) The Repair /Replacement Program and Plans, and
interpass temperature shall be 450°F (232°C). Thermo- associated evaluation, shall be subject to review in
couples and recording instruments shall be used to accordance with IWA-4150(d).
monitor the process temperatures. Their attachment and
removal shall be in accordance with Section III. IWA-4611.2 Examination Following Defect Re- A99
(b) The welding procedure and the welders or weld- moval
ing operators shall be qualified in accordance with (a) After final grinding, the affected surfaces, includ-
Section IX and the additional requirements of this ing surfaces of cavities prepared for welding, shall be
Subarticle. examined by the magnetic particle or liquid penetrant
(1) Procedure Qualification method to ensure that the indication has been reduced
(a) The test assembly material for the welding to an acceptable limit in accordance with IWA-3000.
procedure qualification test shall be of the same P- This examination is not required when defect elimination
Number and Group Number, including a postweld heat removes the full thickness of the weld and back side
treatment that is at least equivalent to the time and of the weld joint is not accessible for removal of
temperature already applied to the material being examination materials.
welded. (b) Indications detected as a result of the excavation
(b) The techniques described for the following that are not associated with the defect being removed
shall be evaluated for acceptability in accordance with
welding procedures shall be used in the preparation of
IWA-3000.
the procedure qualification coupons.
(2) Performance Qualification. If the weld is to
be performed where physical obstructions impair the
IWA-4620 SIMILAR MATERIALS
welder’s ability to perform, the welder shall also demon-
strate the ability to deposit sound weld metal in the IWA-4621 General Requirements
positions required, using the same parameters and simu- (a) Repair /replacement activities on P-Nos. 1, 3,
lated physical obstructions as are involved in the repair / 12A, 12B, and 12C2 base materials and associated
replacement activity. welds may be performed without the specified postweld
(c) The neutron fluence in the weld area shall be heat treatments, provided the requirements of IWA-
taken into account when establishing the weld metal 4621(b) and (c) and IWA-4622 through IWA-4624
composition limits. are met.
(b) The maximum area of an individual weld based
on the finished surface shall be 100 sq in. (64,500 mm2),
A99 IWA-4611 DEFECT REMOVAL and the depth of the weld shall not be greater than
IWA-4611.1 General Requirements one-half of the base metal thickness.
(a) Defects shall be removed or reduced in size in (c) Peening may be used except on the initial and
accordance with this Paragraph. The component shall final weld layers.
be acceptable for continued service if the resultant
section thickness created by the cavity is at least the IWA-4622 Welding Qualifications
minimum design thickness. If the resulting section
(a) The test assembly cavity depth shall be at least
thickness is less than the minimum design thickness,
one-half the depth of the weld installed during the
the component shall be corrected by repair /replacement
repair/replacement activity but not less than 1 in.
activities in accordance with this Article. Alternatively,
(25 mm). The test assembly thickness shall be at least
the defect removal area and any remaining portion of
the flaw may be evaluated and the component accepted 2 P-Nos. 12A, 12B, and 12C designations refer to specific material
in accordance with the appropriate flaw evaluation classifications originally identified in Section III and subsequently
provisions of Section XI or the design provisions of reclassified in a later Edition of Section IX.
46
twice the test assembly cavity depth. The test assembly metal temperature of the item to be repaired. The
shall be large enough to permit removal of the required location and orientation of the test specimens shall be
test specimens. The test assembly dimensions sur- similar to that required in IWA-4622(d)(1), but shall
rounding the cavity shall be at least the test assembly be in the base material.
thickness, but not less than 6 in. (152 mm). The (c) Charpy V-notch tests of the weld metal of the
qualification test plate shall be prepared in accordance procedure qualification shall meet the requirements as
with Fig. IWA-4622-1. determined in IWA-4622(b).
(b) The test assembly base material for the welding (d) Charpy V-notch tests of the heat affected zone
procedure qualification test shall meet the impact test (HAZ) of the procedure qualification shall be made at
requirements of the Construction Code and Owner’s the same temperature as the base metal test in IWA-
Requirements. If such requirements are not in the 4622(b). Number, location, and orientation of the test
Construction Code and Owner’s Requirements, they specimens shall be as follows:
shall be determined by impact tests of the procedure (1) The specimens shall be removed from a loca-
qualification base material at or below the lowest service tion as near as practical to a depth of one-half the
46.1
47
IWA-4622 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-4624
thickness of the deposited weld metal. The coupons second layer shall be deposited with a 1⁄8 in. (3.2 mm)
for heat affected zone impact specimens shall be taken diameter electrode. Subsequent layers shall be deposited
transverse to the axis of the weld and etched to define with a welding electrode no larger than 5⁄32 in. (4 mm)
the heat affected zone. See Fig. IWA-4622-1. The diameter. Bead deposition shall be performed in a
notch of the Charpy V-notch specimen may be cut manner shown in Fig. IWA-4623.1-1, Step 3. The
approximately normal to the material surface in such completed weld shall have at least one layer of weld
a manner as to include as much heat affected zone as reinforcement deposited and then this reinforcement
possible in the resulting fracture. When the material shall be removed by mechanical means, making the
thickness permits, the axis of a specimen shall be finished surface of the weld substantially flush with
inclined to allow the root of the notch to align parallel the surface surrounding the weld.
to the fusion line. (e) The weld area shall be maintained at a tempera-
(2) The Charpy V-notch test shall be performed ture of 450°F–550°F (232°C–288°C) for a minimum
in accordance with SA-370. Specimens shall be in of 2 hr after completion of the weld in P-No. 1
accordance with SA-370, Fig. 11, Type A. A test shall materials. For P-No. 3 materials, the holding time shall
consist of a set of three full-size 10 mm × 10 mm be a minimum of 4 hr.
specimens. The lateral expansion and /or absorbed en-
ergy, as applicable, and the test temperature, as well IWA-4623.2 Gas Tungsten-Arc Welding. The pro-
as the orientation and location of all tests performed cedure shall include the requirements of IWA-4623.2(a)
shall be reported in the Procedure Qualification Record. through (c):
(e) The average of the three HAZ impact tests shall (a) The weld metal shall be deposited by the auto-
be equal to or greater than the average of the three matic or machine gas tungsten-arc weld process using
base metal tests. cold wire feed.
(b) The cavity shall be buttered with the first six
layers of weld metal as shown in Fig. IWA-4623.2-1,
IWA-4623 Welding Procedure Steps 1 through 3, with the weld heat input for each
IWA-4623.1 Shielded Metal-Arc Welding. The pro- layer controlled to within 610% of that used in the
cedure shall include the requirements of IWA-4623.1(a) procedure qualification test. Subsequent layers shall be
through (e): deposited with a heat input equal to or less than that
(a) The weld metal shall be deposited using low used for layers beyond the sixth in the procedure
hydrogen electrode meeting the coating moisture content qualification (see Fig. IWA-4623.2-1, Step 4). The
requirements of SFA-5-5. The maximum bead width completed weld shall have at least one layer of weld
shall be four times the electrode core diameter. reinforcement deposited and then this reinforcement
(b) All covered electrodes from hermetically sealed shall be removed by mechanical means, making the
containers shall immediately be used or placed into finished surface of the weld substantially flush with
holding or drying ovens operating between 225°F the surface surrounding the weld.
(107°C) and 300°F (149°C). Covered electrodes from (c) The weld area shall be maintained at a minimum
other than hermetically sealed containersshall be baked temperature of 300°F (149°C) for a minimum of 2 hr
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s after completion of the weld repair in P-No. 1 materials.
recommendations. After baking and before the elec- For P-No. 3 materials, the holding time shall be a
trodes are allowed to cool below 225°F (107°C), they minimum of 4 hr.
shall be transferred to holding or drying ovens operating
between 225°F (107°C) and 350°F (117°C).
IWA-4624 Examination
(c) Electrodes removed from the holding ovens in
IWA-4623.1(b) for a period in excess of 8 hr for (a) The initial layer shall be examined by the mag-
E70XX electrodes or 4 hr for E80XX and E90XX netic particle method after grinding or machining. Each
electrodes shall be reprocessed in accordance with subsequent layer shall be examined by the magnetic
IWA-4623.1(b). Electrodes shall not be rebaked more particle method if a final volumetric examination will
than once. not be performed.
(d) The cavity shall be buttered using a 3⁄32 in. (b) The weld shall be nondestructively examined after
(2.4 mm) diameter electrode as shown in Fig. IWA- the completed weld has been at ambient temperature for
4623.1-1, Step 1. The weld bead crown surface shall at least 48 hr. The nondestructive examination of the
be removed by grinding or machining before depositing welded region shall include both volumetric [except as
the second layer (see Fig. IWA-4623.1-1, Step 2). The permitted in IWA-4624(a)] and surface examination.
48
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Fig. IWA-4623.1-1
FIG. IWA-4623.1-1 TEMPER BEAD WELDING AND WELD TEMPER BEAD REINFORCEMENT
49
Fig. IWA-4623.2-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
50
IWA-4624 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4633.2
(c) Areas from which weld attached thermocouples 3 weld joints. The maximum bead width shall be four
have been removed shall be ground and examined by times the electrode core diameter.
a surface examination method. (b) All covered electrodes used for qualification test
and welding shall be from freshly opened, hermetically
sealed packages or heated ovens maintained between
IWA-4630 DISSIMILAR MATERIALS 225°F (107°C) and 350°F (177°C). Electrodes with-
drawn from hermetically sealed containers or ovens for
IWA-4631 General Requirements
longer than 8 hr shall be discarded or shall be baked once
(a) Repair /replacement activities on welds that join in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations
P-No. 8 or P-No. 43 material to P-No. 1, 3, 12A, 12B, and placed immediately back into the holding ovens.
and 12C material may be made without the specified If withdrawn again for longer than 8 hr, they shall be
postweld heat treatment, provided the requirements of discarded.
IWA-4631(b) and IWA-4632 through IWA-4634 are (c) The electrodes may be maintained in heated
met. ovens in the work area. The oven temperature shall be
(b) Repair /replacement activities in accordance with maintained between 225°F (107°C) and 350°F (177°C).
this paragraph are limited to those along the fusion Electrodes exposed to the atmosphere for more than 8
line of a nonferritic weld to ferritic base material where hr shall be discarded or shall be baked once in accord-
1⁄ in. (3.2 mm) or less of nonferritic weld deposit ance with the manufacturer’s recommendations and
8
exists above the original fusion line after defect removal. placed immediately back into the holding ovens. Elec-
If the defect penetrates into the ferritic base material, trodes exposed to the atmosphere for more than 8 hr
welding of the base material may be performed in after being baked once shall be discarded.
accordance with IWA-4633 provided the depth of the (d) All areas of the ferritic base material, exposed
weld in the base material does not exceed 3⁄8 in. The or not, on which weld metal is to be deposited, shall
repair /replacement activity performed on a completed be covered with a single layer of weld deposit using
joint shall not exceed one-half the joint thickness. The 3⁄
32 in. (2.4 mm) diameter electrodes. The weld bead
surface of the completed weld shall not exceed 100 crown surface shall be removed by grinding or machin-
sq in. (64,500 mm2). ing before depositing the second layer. The second
layer shall be deposited with 1⁄8 in. (3.2 mm) diameter
electrodes. Subsequent layers shall be deposited with
IWA-4632 Welding Procedure Qualification
welding electrodes no larger than 5⁄32 in. (4 mm) in
(a) The test assembly cavity depth shall be at least diameter. (See Fig. IWA-4633.1-1).
one-half the depth of the weld installed during the (e) After at least 3⁄16 in. (4.8 mm) of weld metal
repair/replacement activity but not less than 1 in. has been deposited, the weld area shall be maintained
(25 mm). The test assembly thickness shall be at least in the range of 450°F–550°F (232°C–288°C) for 4 hr
twice the test assembly cavity depth. The test assembly minimum.
shall be large enough to permit removal of the required (f) Subsequent to the above heat treatment, the bal-
test specimens. The test assembly dimensions sur- ance of the welding may be performed at a maximum
rounding the cavity shall be at least the test assembly interpass temperature of 350°F (177°C).
thickness, but not less than 6 in. (152 mm). The
qualification test place shall be prepared in accordance IWA-4633.2 Gas Tungsten-Arc Welding. The pro-
with Fig. IWA-4622-1. cedure shall include the requirements of IWA-4633.2(a)
(b) The ferritic base material and HAZ shall meet through (e):
the requirements of IWA-4622. (a) The weld shall be made using A-No. 8 weld
metal (QW-442) for P-No. 8 to P-No. 1 or P-No. 3
weld joints or F-No. 43 weld metal (QW-432) for
IWA-4633 Welding Procedure
either P-No. 8 or P-No. 43 to P-No. 1 or P-No. 3
IWA-4633.1 Shielded Metal-Arc Welding. The pro- weld joints.
cedure shall include the requirements of IWA-4633.1(a) (b) The weld metal shall be deposited by the auto-
through (f): matic or machine gas tungsten arc weld process using
(a) The weld metal shall be deposited using A-No. cold wire feed.
8 weld metal (QW-442) for P-No. 8 to P-No. 1 or P- (c) The cavity shall be buttered with the first six
No. 3 weld joints or F-No. 43 weld metal (QW-432) layers of weld metal as shown in Fig. IWA-4633.2-1,
for either P-No. 8 or P-No. 43 to P-No. 1 or P-No. Steps 1 through 3, with the weld heat input for each
51
Fig. IWA-4633.1-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
FIG. IWA-4633.1-1 TEMPER BEAD WELDING AND WELD TEMPER BEAD REINFORCEMENT OF DISSIMILAR
METAL WELDS OR BUTTERING
52
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Fig. IWA-4633.2-1
53
IWA-4633.2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-4643.2
layer controlled to within 610% of that used in the IWA-4643 Welding Procedure
procedure qualification test. Subsequent layers shall be
IWA-4643.1 Shielded Metal-Arc Welding. The pro-
deposited with a heat input equal to or less than that
cedure shall include the requirements of IWA-4643.1(a)
used for layers beyond the sixth in the procedure
through (g):
qualification (see Fig. IWA-4633.2-1, Step 4). The
(a) The welds shall be made using A-No. 8 weld
completed weld shall have at least one layer of weld
metal (QW-442) for austenitic stainless steel cladding
reinforcement deposited and then this reinforcement
or F-No. 43 weld metal (QW-432) for either austenitic
shall be removed by mechanical means, making the
stainless steel or nickel base cladding.
finished surface of the weld substantially flush with
(b) The maximum bead width shall be four times
the surface surrounding the weld.
the electrode core diameter.
(d) After at least 3⁄16 in. (4.8 mm) of weld metal
(c) All covered electrodes used for the qualification
has been deposited, the weld area shall be maintained
test and welding shall be from freshly opened, hermeti-
at a minimum temperature of 300°F (149°C) for a
cally sealed packages or heated ovens maintained be-
minimum of 2 hr in P-No. 1 materials. For P-No. 3
tween 225°F (107°C) and 350°F (177°C). Electrodes
materials, the minimum holding time shall be 4 hr.
withdrawn from hermetically sealed containers or ovens
(e) Subsequent to the above heat treatment, the bal-
for longer than 8 hr shall be discarded or shall be
ance of the welding may be performed at maximum
baked once in accordance with the manufacturer’s rec-
interpass temperature of 350°F (177°C).
ommendations and placed immediately back into the
holding ovens. If withdrawn again for longer than 8
hr, they shall be discarded.
IWA-4634 Examination (d) The electrodes may be maintained in heated
The weld as well as the preheated band shall be ovens in the work area. The oven temperature shall be
examined by the liquid penetrant method after the maintained between 225°F (107°C) and 350°F (177°C).
completed weld has been at ambient temperature for at Electrodes exposed to the atmosphere for more than 8
least 48 hr. The weld shall be volumetrically examined. hr shall be discarded or shall be baked once in accord-
ance with the manufacturer’s recommendations and
placed immediately back into the holding ovens. Elec-
trodes exposed to the atmosphere for more than 8 hr
IWA-4640 CLADDING after being baked once shall be discarded.
IWA-4641 General Requirements (e) All areas of the base material on which weld
metal is to be deposited shall be covered with a single
Repair /replacement activities on austenitic stainless layer of weld deposit using 3⁄32 in. (2.4 mm) diameter
steel and nickel base cladding on P-No. 1, 3, 12A, electrodes. The weld bead crown surface of the first
12B, and 12C base materials when the ferritic material layer shall be removed by grinding or machining before
is within 1 ⁄ 8 in. of being exposed may be performed by depositing the second layer. The second layer shall be
welding without the specified postweld heat treatments deposited with 1⁄8 in. (3.2 mm) diameter electrodes.
provided the requirements of IWA-4642 through IWA- Subsequent layers shall be deposited with electrodes
4644 are met. no larger than 5⁄32 in. (4 mm) diameter.
(f) After completion of welding or when at least
3⁄
16 in. (4.8 mm) of weld metal has been deposited,
IWA-4642 Welding Procedure Qualifications the weld area shall be maintained at a temperature of
450°F– 550°F (232°C–288°C) for a minimum of 2 hr in
(a) When the weld involves two different P-Number
P-No. 1 materials. For P-No. 3 materials, the minimum
or Group Number materials, the test assembly shall
holding time shall be 4 hr.
duplicate the combination.
(g) Subsequent to the above heat treatment, the bal-
(b) The test assembly base material shall be at least
ance of the welding, if any, may be performed at a
12 in. × 12 in. × 2 in. (305 mm× 305 mm × 51 mm)
maximum interpass temperature of 350°F (177°C).
thick, with a clad surface area of at least 8 in. × 8
in. (203 mm × 203 mm) in the area from which the IWA-4643.2 Gas Tungsten-Arc Welding. The pro-
bend test specimens will be removed. cedure shall include the requirements of IWA-4643.2(a)
(c) The guided bend test acceptance standards de- through (e):
scribed in Section IX for cladding shall also be applica- (a) The welds shall be made using A-No. 8 weld
ble to the HAZ of the base material. metal (QW-442) for austenitic stainless steel cladding
54
IWA-4643.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4652.1
or F-No. 43 weld metal (QW-432) for either austenitic other than hermetically sealed containers shall be baked
stainless steel or nickel base cladding. at the electrode manufacturer’s recommended baking
(b) The weld metal shall be deposited by the auto- temperature. After baking and before cooling below
matic or machine gas tungsten-arc weld process using 225°F (107°C), the electrodes shall be transferred to
cold wire feed. the holding or drying ovens and maintained at 225°F–
(c) The cavity shall be buttered with the first six 350°F (107°C and 177°C).
layers of weld metal as shown in Fig. IWA 4643.2-1, (2) The electrodes shall be maintained in heated
Steps 1 through 3, with the weld heat input for each ovens or heated portable containers in the work area
layer controlled to within 610% of that used in the until used. The oven temperature shall be maintained
procedure qualification test. Subsequent layers shall be between 225°F (107°C) and 350°F (177°C). Electrodes
deposited with a heat input equal to or less than that shall be used within 2 hr after removal from the holding
used for layers beyond the sixth in the procedure or drying ovens or heated portable containers. Electrodes
qualification (see Fig. IWA-4643.2-1, Step 4). removed from heated ovens for more than 2 hr, but
(d) After completion of welding, or when at least less than 4 hr, shall be returned to a holding oven and
3⁄
16 in. (4.8 mm) of weld metal has been deposited, held at a temperature between 225°F (107°C) and 350°F
the weld area shall be maintained at a minimum tempera- (177°C) for at least 8 hr before use. Electrodes removed
ture of 300°F (149°C) for a minimum of 2 hr in P- from heated ovens or heated portable containers for a
No. 1 materials. For P-No. 3 materials, the holding period in excess of 4 hr shall be rebaked in accordance
time shall be a minimum of 4 hr. with IWA-4651(c)(1) before use. Electrodes shall not
(e) Subsequent to the above heat treatment, the bal- be rebaked more than once.
ance of the welding, if any, may be performed at a (d) Welding materials shall be controlled so that they
maximum interpass temperature of 350°F (177°C). are identified as acceptable material until consumed.
(e) Welding material contaminated with oil, grease,
water, or other foreign material shall not be used.
IWA-4644 Examination
(f) All welding material shall conform to the material
The weld as well as the preheated band shall be testing requirements of NE-2000 for Class MC or CC-
examined by the liquid penetrant method and deposited 2500 for Class CC. For each lot of covered electrodes,
weld metal and HAZ shall be examined by the ultrasonic weld metal tests shall be made in accordance with test
method, after the completed weld has been at ambient requirements of NE-2431.1 for Class MC or CC-2612.1
temperature for at least 48 hr. for Class CC, and the coupons shall be tested in
the as-welded condition. Impact test requirements and
acceptance criteria shall be as required by the Construc-
IWA-4650 BUTTER BEAD — TEMPER BEAD tion Code and Owner’s Requirements for the component
WELDING FOR CLASS MC AND base metal to be welded.
FOR CLASS CC METALLIC (g) Controlled peening of welds may be performed
LINERS to minimize distortion, provided it is also used on the
welds made to qualify the welding procedure and the
IWA-4651 General Requirements
production test assembly. Peening shall not be used
(a) Repair /replacement activities on P-No. 1, Gr. on the initial layer of the weld metal or on the final
No. 1 and 2 material may be made without the specified layer. If peening is used, it shall be considered as an
postweld heat treatment, provided the requirements of essential variable in the welding procedure.
IWA-4651(b) through (h) and IWA-4652 through IWA- (h) Fabrication and welding shall be sequenced to
4655 are met. minimize the effects of restraint.
(b) The shielded metal-arc welding process (SMAW)
using low hydrogen electrodes meeting the coating
moisture content requirements of SFA-5.5 shall be used.
(c) The following requirements apply to low hydro-
IWA-4652 Welding Qualification
gen electrodes.
(1) After receipt from the electrode manufacturer IWA-4652.1 General Requirements. The welding
and before use, all covered electrodes from hermetically procedure and welders shall be qualified in accordance
sealed containers shall be immediately used or placed with Section IX and the additional requirements of
into holding or drying ovens operating between 225°F Section III, except as modified or supplemented by
(107°C) and 350°F (177°C). Covered electrodes from IWA-4652.2 through IWA-4652.4.
55
Fig. IWA-4643.2-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
56
IWA-4652.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4652.4
IWA-4652.2 Procedure Qualification. Welding pro- throat thickness, and for groove welds, the nominal
cedure qualification tests shall be performed in accord- thickness is the depth of the weld groove.
ance with Section IX for groove welds and the additional (5) restraint on the weld joint. The restraint shall
requirements of NE-4000 for Class MC or CC-4000 be maintained on the production test assembly for a
for Class CC. Impact test requirements and acceptance minimum of 48 hr after the completed weld has reached
criteria shall be as required by the Construction Code ambient temperature.
and Owner’s Requirements for the component base (6) weld sequencing (both fabrication steps and
material. order of bead sequence);
(7) weld position (see Section IX);
IWA-4652.3 Performance Qualification. The weld- (8) water backing and water temperature within
ers shall be qualified on a radiographically examined specified tolerances, as applicable;
groove weld test in accordance with Section IX and (9) actual weld electrode size to be used for the
by performance of the production test required by IWA- butter bead layer and the temper bead layer;
4652.4. The welder shall use the production Welding (10) range of electrode sizes to be used to complete
Procedure Specification and simulate typical physical the weld joint;
obstructions. (11) preheat and preheat maintenance within toler-
ances specified in the Welding Procedure Specification;
(12) peening, as applicable;
IWA-4652.4 Production Test. In addition to the (13) guides, templates, and fixtures used for weld
procedure qualification test requirements of IWA- placement, as applicable;
4652.2, one production test is required prior to any (14) maximum temper bead edge clearance (dimen-
welding. A production test simulates welding using the sion S) as shown in Figs. IWA-4652.4-1 and IWA-
variables listed in IWA-4652.4(a) and (b). A production 4652.4-2 and the minimum temper bead edge clearances;
test assembly may consist of one or more production (15) maximum weave width for the butter bead
tests. The variables listed in IWA-4652.4(a) and (b) layer.
shall be evaluated by performing a production test. (c) The production test shall be of sufficient size to
The production test assembly shall be evaluated by
permit removal of the test specimens required in IWA-
performing the examinations required by IWA-
4652.4(d).
4652.4(d).
(d) The production test shall be evaluated as follows:
(a) The production test base material that represents
(1) visual examination in accordance with IWA-
the pressure boundary shall be of the same material
2000 (VT-3) for compliance with the Welding Procedure
specification, type, class, group number, or grade as
Specification;
the pressure boundary material to be welded. All other
(2) surface examination and acceptance of the
material shall be of the same P-Number as those to
welds in the completed test assembly in accordance
be used in the repair /replacement activity. When the
with Subsection NE for Class MC or Subsection CC
original material is no longer manufactured, material
similar to the original material specification may be for Class CC;
substituted. Electrodes used for the production test shall (3) Examination of two cross sections for each
be the same specification and classification as those production test is required. The cross sections shall be
used for the weld and shall be treated as required by polished and suitably etched and examined at 10X
IWA-4651(c). magnification. Cross sections containing cracks or other
(b) The production test shall simulate the repair/ deleterious conditions shall be cause for rejection of
replacement weld. The following parameters shall be the production test.
recorded: (4) A minimum of two micro-hardness traverses
(1) all essential and supplementary essential vari- shall be taken from one cross section for each production
ables listed for the process in Section IX; test. The traverses shall be taken from areas of maximum
(2) nominal pressure boundary base metal anticipated hardness including the toe of the butter bead
thickness; layer as shown in Fig. IWA-4652.4-1. The indentation
(3) maximum nominal attachment base metal spacing of the heat affected zone (HAZ) microhardness
thickness; traverse shall consist of not less than ten indentations.
(4) weld joint geometry (including joint design Hardness values for the traverse shall be recorded. The
and fit up tolerances) and the maximum nominal weld maximum hardness for the pressure boundary HAZ
thickness. For fillet welds, the nominal thickness is the shall not exceed 400 KHN (500 g load).
57
Fig. IWA-4652.4-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
58
IWA-4653 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4655
FIG. IWA-4652.4-2 ILLUSTRATION OF THE TEMPER BEAD TECHNIQUE FOR REINFORCEMENT OF EXISTING
FILLET WELDS
59
IWA-4655 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-4663.1
MC or CC-4540 for Class CC, except as noted in (4) A change in the nominal background gas com-
IWA-4655(b). position.5
(b) Improper application of the temper bead or defects (5) For SMAW and FCAW, use of a larger diame-
in the butter bead or temper bead shall be corrected ter electrode than that used in qualification.
by application of a new butter bead and temper bead (6) For P-No. 1 material, a decrease in the mini-
as shown in Fig. IWA-4655-1. mum distance from the point of welding to the wetted
(c) The repair technique for undercut greater than surface in any direction, when the minimum distance
1⁄
32 in. (0.8 mm) is shown in Fig. IWA-4655-2. is less than 6 in.
(7) For P-No. 1 material, the supplementary essen-
tial variables of Section XI apply to non-impact-tested
base metal when the minimum distance from the point
IWA-4660 UNDERWATER WELDING of welding to the wetted surface in any direction is
less than 6 in.
IWA-4661 Scope and General Requirements (b) Additional nonessential variables:
(a) These requirements4 are for dry or wet underwater (1) For SMAW and FCAW, an increase in time
welding. of electrode exposure to the underwater environment.
(b) The terms and definitions of ANSI/AWS D3.6, (2) A change in the method of protecting, removing
“Specification for Underwater Welding,” shall be used. moisture from, or otherwise conditioning bare filler
(c) Welding of P-No. 1, P-No. 8, and P-No. 4X metal and bare electrodes in the underwater envi-
materials may be performed under water provided the ronment.
welding procedures and welders or welding operators IWA-4662.2 Performance Qualification. Welders
are qualified in accordance with Section IX as modified and welding operators for dry underwater welding shall
by IWA-4662, IWA-4663, or IWA-4665, as applicable. be qualified in accordance with Section IX and the
(d) Dry underwater welding may be performed with variables listed below. When a welder or welding
GMAW, GTAW, PAW, SMAW, or a combination of operator has not welded with a process in a dry
these processes. underwater environment for at least six months, the
(e) Wet underwater welding may be performed with qualifications for that underwater process shall expire.
GMAW (FCAW-type only), SMAW, or a combination (a) A change in welding mode (i.e., dry chamber,
of these processes. dry spot, or habitat).
(b) A change in the SFA specification AWS filler
metal classification, or if not conforming to an AWS
IWA-4662 Additional Variables for Dry filler metal classification, a change in the manufacturer’s
Underwater Welding trade name for the electrode or filler metal.
(c) Addition or deletion of supplementary coatings
IWA-4662.1 Procedure Qualification. Welding pro- for the filler metal or a change in the type of any
cedure specifications for dry underwater welding shall supplementary coatings.
be qualified in accordance with the requirements of (d) A change in depth beyond that qualified in accord-
Section IX for groove welds. The following variables ance with Table IWA-4662.1-1.
also apply. (e) For SMAW and GMAW, use of a larger diameter
(a) Additional essential variables: electrode than that used during performance qualifi-
(1) A change in the method for underwater trans- cation.
port and storage of filler material (e.g., from sealed
packages to exposed).
(2) Addition or deletion of waterproof or supple- IWA-4663 Additional Variables for Wet
mentary coatings for the filler metal or a change in Underwater Welding
the type of any waterproof or supplementary coatings.
IWA-4663.1 Procedure Qualification. Welding pro-
(3) A change in depth beyond that qualified in
cedure specifications for wet underwater welding shall
accordance with Table IWA-4662.1-1.
be qualified to the requirements of Section IX for
groove welds, except that for P-No. 1 base metals, the
4 ANSI/AWS D3.6, “Specification for Underwater Welding,” contains
additional technical information that the Owner or user may find
useful. Additional variables or controls may be considered for specific 5 Background gas is gas that displaces water and is not necessarily
applications. intended to shield the arc. The gas may or may not be breathable.
60
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Fig. IWA-4655-1
61
Fig. IWA-4655-2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
62
IWA-4663.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4663.2
TABLE IWA-4662.1-11
DEPTH LIMITATIONS FOR UNDERWATER WELDING Mn + Si Cr + Mo + V Ni + Cu
CE p C − + +
QUALIFICATION 6 5 15
Max. Depth Min. Depth NOTE: The chemical analysis for carbon equivalent calcula-
Type of Welding Qualified2 Qualified3 tions for the production base material may be obtained from
the mill test certificate or chemical analysis. If it is not practi-
Dry Welding D plus 33 ft D minus 33 ft
cal to obtain chemical analysis for Cr, Mo, V, Ni, and Cu, the
Wet Welding with A-No. 8 Fil- D plus 10 ft D minus 33 ft carbon equivalent may be determined by using 0.1 for the term
ler Metals
3 4
Cr + Mo + V Ni + Cu
Wet Welding with F-No. 4X Fil- D D minus 33 ft + .
5 15
ler Metals
Wet Welding with Other A-No. D plus 33 ft D minus 33 ft4 FIG. IWA-4663.1-1 CARBON EQUIVALENCY
8 and F-No. 4X Filler Metals CALCULATION
GENERAL NOTES:
(1) D is qualification test depth.
(2) For the maximum depth qualified, depth shall be measured from
the lower extremity of the test weldment with a tolerance of plus
or minus 9 in.
(3) For the minimum depth qualified, depth shall be measured from polarity) to electrode positive (reverse polarity), or
the upper extremity of the test weldment with a tolerance of plus
or minus 9 in. vice versa.
(4) Welds at depths less than 10 ft require qualification at the produc- (10) A change from wet backside to dry backside
tion weld minimum depth. for backing thickness less than 1⁄4 in. (6 mm).
(11) For P-No. 1 base metal carbon equivalents as
calculated in accordance with Fig. IWA-4663.1-1, an
increase in the carbon equivalent beyond that of the
supplementary essential variables of Section IX apply procedure qualification test coupon.
to nonimpact-tested base metal. The following variables (12) An increase in the time of electrode exposure
also apply. to water at qualification depth.
(a) Additional essential variables: (13) For P-No. 1 base materials, a change from
(1) A change in the method for underwater trans- multipass per side to single pass per side.
port and storage of filler material (e.g., from sealed (b) Additional nonessential variable: a decrease in
packages to exposed). included angle, a decrease in root opening, or an
(2) Addition or deletion of waterproof or supple- increase in root face.
mentary coatings for the filler metal or a change in
the type of any waterproof or supplementary coatings.
(3) A change in electrode diameter beyond the IWA-4663.2 Performance Qualification. Welders
range used in qualification. and welding operators for wet underwater welding shall
(4) A change in depth beyond that qualified in be qualified in accordance with Section IX and the
accordance with Table IWA-4662.1-1. variables listed below. For P-No. 1 base metals, if
(5) A change in the SFA specification AWS filler mechanical bend testing is attempted in lieu of radio-
metal classification, or, if not conforming to an AWS graphic examination and the coupons fail the require-
filler metal classification, a change in the manufacturer’s ments of QW-302.1, immediate retesting may be by
trade name for the electrode or filler metal. radiographic examination in accordance with QW-302.2.
(6) Addition of welding positions other than those When a welder or welding operator has not welded
qualified in accordance with Table IWA-4662.1-2. with a process in a wet underwater environment for
(7) A change from upward to downward, or vice at least six months, the qualifications for welding with
versa, in the progression specified for any pass of a that process underwater shall expire.
vertical weld. (a) A change in the SFA specification AWS filler
(8) A change from the stringer bead technique to metal classification, or, if not conforming to an AWS
the weave bead technique, or vice versa. For P-No. 8 filler metal classification, a change in the manufacturer’s
and P-No. 4X base metals, this variable applies only trade name for the electrode or filler metal.
to the vertical position. (b) Addition or deletion of waterproof or supplemen-
(9) A change from ac to dc, or vice versa, and, tary coating for the filler metal or a change in the
in dc welding, a change from electrode negative (straight type of any waterproof or supplementary coatings.
63
IWA-4663.2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-4664
TABLE IWA-4662.1-2
PROCEDURE AND PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION — TYPE POSITION LIMITATIONS
(c) A change from salt or borated water to fresh with the SFA specification most nearly matching that
water. material (e.g., for ferritic covered electrodes, SFA-5.1).
(d) Use of a larger diameter electrode than that used (b) The coupon shall be tested as follows:
during performance qualification. (1) The ferrite number shall be directly measured
(e) A change in depth beyond that qualified in accord- for austenitic stainless steel, QW-442, A-No. 8 filler
ance with Table IWA-4662.1-1. metal.
(f) Addition of welding positions other than those (2) One all-weld-metal specimen shall be tension
qualified in accordance with Table IWA-4662.1-2. tested.
(g) A change in polarity or type of power source (3) As-deposited chemical composition shall be
(e.g., rectifier, motor-generator, inverter). determined in accordance with the applicable SFA
(h) A change from stringer bead to weave technique. specification or the SFA specification most nearly
(i) A change in the welder’s view from beneath to matching the material.
above the water surface. (4) For ferritic weld metal, Charpy V-notch ab-
(j) A decrease in the included angle, a decrease in
sorbed energy shall be determined in accordance with
root opening, or an increase in the root face.
IWA-4665(b), and, when applicable, the Construction
Code.
IWA-4664 Filler Metal Qualification (c) Acceptance criteria:
(1) The ferrite number shall meet the requirements
Each filler metal heat, lot, waterproof coating type,
and supplementary coating type to be used in production of the Construction Code.
shall be tested in accordance with the following require- (2) The ultimate tensile strength shall meet the
ments. minimum tensile strength specified for either of the
(a) An all-weld-metal coupon shall be prepared using base metals to be joined.
the production welding procedure at a depth such that (3) The chemical composition shall meet the appli-
the depth of the production weld will be within the cable SFA specification requirements for the as-depos-
depth limitations of Table IWA-4662.1-1. ited chemical composition. For material that does not
(1) For material that conforms to an SFA specifi- conform to an SFA specification, the chemical composi-
cation, the coupon shall be prepared in accordance with tion shall meet the requirements specified in the WPS.
the applicable SFA specification. (4) Charpy V-notch absorbed energy shall meet
(2) For material that does not conform to an SFA the requirements of IWA-4665(c) and, when applicable,
specification, the coupon shall be prepared in accordance the Construction Code.
64
IWA-4665 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4711.1
IWA-4665 Alternative Procedure Qualification (c) Ultrasonic, eddy current and visual surface indica-
Requirements tions shall be evaluated using the surface examination
acceptance criteria of the Construction Code, Section
(a) As an alternative to the bend test requirement
III, or this Division.
of Section IX, Charpy V-notch tests may be used when
(d) Personnel performing visual examinations shall
qualifying procedures for wet underwater welding of
be qualified in accordance with IWA-2200 for perform-
P-No. 1 base material.
ance of VT-1 visual examinations and shall have re-
(b) Charpy V-notch tests of the weld metal and heat
ceived additional training in examination of weldments
affected zone (HAZ) of the procedure qualification shall
for fabrication conditions, including dimensional re-
be performed at 32°F. Number, location, and orientation
quirements and fabrication flaws.
of the test specimens shall be as follows.
(1) The specimens shall be removed from a loca- IWA-4666.2 Volumetric Examination. In lieu of
tion as near as practical to a depth of one-half the any required volumetric examination, the following
thickness of the deposited weld metal. The coupons apply:
for HAZ impact specimens shall be taken transverse (a) When practical, a volumetric examination shall
to the axis of the weld and etched to define the HAZ. be conducted with an ultrasonic examination procedure.
The notch of the Charpy V-notch specimen shall be The ultrasonic examination shall be conducted in accord-
cut approximately normal to the material surface in ance with Section V, Article 5. Indications shall be
such a manner as to include as much HAZ as possible evaluated using the volumetric acceptance criteria of
in the resulting fracture. When the material thickness the Construction Code, Section III, or this Division.
permits, the longitudinal specimen axis shall be perpen- (b) When ultrasonic volumetric examination is not
dicular to the fusion line. practical, a nondestructive surface examination shall be
(2) The Charpy V-notch test shall be performed performed on the root pass and on the finished weld.
in accordance with SA-370. Specimens shall be in When it is impractical to perform a surface examination
accordance with SA-370, Fig. 11, type A. A test shall on either the root or the finished weld, the provisions
consist of a set of three full-size 10 mm x 10 mm of IWA-4666.1 apply.
specimens. The absorbed energy and the test tempera-
ture, as well as the orientation and location of the
tests performed, shall be reported in the Procedure
IWA-4700 HEAT EXCHANGER TUBING
Qualification Record.
(c) The averages of the three weld metal impact IWA-4710 PLUGGING
tests and the three HAZ impact tests shall each be at
IWA-4711 Explosive Welding
least 25 ft. lbs.
(d) Charpy V-notch tests of the weld metal are not If explosive welding is used to weld plugs to Class
required for austenitic (A-No. 8) or nickel-base (F-No. 1 heat exchanger tubes or heat exchanger tubesheet
4X) filler material. bore holes, the requirements of IWA-4711.1 through
IWA-4711.4 shall be met. These requirements may be
used for Class 2 and Class 3 heat exchangers.
IWA-4666 Examination
IWA-4711.1 General Requirements
When it is impractical to perform the nondestructive
(a) Material used in manufacturing plugs shall be
examinations required by this Division or the Construc-
produced in compliance with requirements of a SA
tion Code because of the underwater environment, the
or SB material specification or any other material
following alternative requirements apply.
specification that has been approved for Section III.
IWA-4666.1 Surface Examination. In lieu of any (b) Each plug shall be traceable to a Certified Material
required surface examination, the following apply: Test Report that indicates the mechanical properties
(a) When practical, a surface examination shall be and chemistry.
conducted with an ultrasonic or eddy current surface (c) Records shall be maintained by the Owner, and
examination procedure qualified for the underwater shall include the following:
environment. (1) plugging procedure
(b) When ultrasonic and eddy current surface exami- (2) welding procedure qualifications
nation is not practical, the surface shall be visually (3) welding operator performance qualifications
examined with a procedure meeting the requirements (4) material certifications
of IWA-2200. (5) location of all plugged tubes or holes
65
IWA-4711.1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-4711.2.1
(6) results of heat exchanger examinations required (12) any change in the nominal plug configuration;
by this Subparagraph (13) a change of 10% or more in the nominal or
(7) specific tubes or holes plugged by each welding average clearance (stand-off) between the tube or hole
operator and the plug. Stand-off shall be determined by consider-
(d) Records of the procedure and welder qualification ing the nominal plug diameter in the bonding area and
shall include the results of all tests required by IWA- the nominal, or, if the tubes of the heat exchanger had
4711.2, and shall be certified by the Repair /Replacement been expanded, the average value of tube inside diame-
Organization. The Procedure Qualification Records shall ters in the bonding area. Such average values should
include a description of all essential and nonessential be determined by measuring a sufficient number of
variables [IWA-4711.2.1(a) and (b)]. The operator per- production tubes of equal size, which have been simi-
formance qualification record shall also list the proce- larly expanded.
dure number and revision that was used for testing; (b) Nonessential Variables
the record of operator experience shall be kept current. (1) a change in the P-Number of tubesheet material
for tube plugging (when plug is not joined to tubesheet);
IWA-4711.2 Welding Qualification (2) a change in the tubesheet cladding (when the
IWA-4711.2.1 Procedure Qualifications. The plug is not joined to the cladding) when the explosive
Welding Procedure Specification for plugging shall be charge is installed within one tube diameter of the
qualified as a new procedure specification and shall be cladding metal;
completely requalified if any of the essential variables (3) for tube plugging, a change in the tube-to-
listed below are changed. Nonessential variables may be tubesheet seal welding procedure when the explosive
changed without requalification, provided the Welding charge is installed within one tube diameter of the
Procedure Specification is amended to show these tube-to-tubesheet seal weld [see IWA-4711.2.1(c)(3)].
changes. (c) Test Assembly
(a) Essential Variables (1) The procedure qualification shall be made on
(1) a change in the P-Number classification (Sec- a test assembly that simulates the conditions to be used
tion IX, QW-422) of any of the materials being joined. in production with respect to position, tube hole pattern,
This includes the tube, plug, tubesheet, or tubesheet and the essential variables listed in this Subparagraph.
cladding. If the plug is to be joined to any part of (2) The test assembly tubesheet thickness shall be
the tubesheet cladding, this cladding must be duplicated as thick as the production tubesheet, except that it need
in the procedure qualification. Materials not listed under not be l in. greater than the length of the explosive plug.
a P-Number require separate qualification. (3) When the explosive charge in the heat ex-
(2) a decrease in the nominal design tube wall changer is to be placed less than one tube diameter
thickness of 10% or more (if the plug is welded to from cladding or a tube-to-tubesheet weld, the qualifica-
the tube); tion test assembly shall also contain cladding or tube-
(3) a change in the tubesheet hole pattern; to-tubesheet welds, as applicable.
(4) a decrease in the proximity of two simultane- (4) The minimum number of explosive welds re-
ously detonated parts; quired for procedure qualification shall be 10 welds
(5) any increase in the number of plugs to be made consecutively.
simultaneously detonated; (d) Examination of Test Assembly
(6) a change in detail controlling explosive densi- (1) When cladding or welds are required per IWA-
ties and charge-to-mass ratios; 4711.2.1(c)(3), such cladding and tube-to-tubesheet
(7) a change in the type of explosive; welds shall be examined by the liquid penetrant method
(8) a change of 10% or more in the explosive and shall comply with the acceptance standards of
charge mass; NB-5000.
(9) a decrease of 15% or more in the tubesheet (2) Each plug weld and tube-to-tubesheet weld
ligament; (when applicable) shall be sectioned longitudinally to
(10) the deletion of cleaning of the tube, plug, or reveal four cross-sectional faces, 180 deg. apart. After
hole contact surfaces, or a change in the cleanliness polishing and etching the four faces, each explosive
requirements (including surface oxide removal) for such weld joint area shall be metallographically examined
surfaces prior to explosive welding; at 50X or greater magnification for the length of
(11) a change of whether or not the tubes had been the explosive bond. The bonding shall be considered
expanded into contact with the tubesheets in the areas acceptable if there is a minimum of five times the
where bonding occurs; nominal tube wall thickness of continuous bond between
66
IWA-4711.2.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4712.2
the plug and tube or tubesheet on each cross-sectioned (f) nondestructive examination
face. Each tube-to-tubesheet weld examination (if appli- (g) method of verifying that both ends of the same
cable) shall be considered acceptable if it is free from tube or tubesheet bore hole are to be plugged
explosively produced cracks as determined visually
using 10X magnification. IWA-4711.4 Examination. The final nondestructive
(3) Suitable mechanical tests may also be used to examination shall be made visually in accordance with
add further assurance that the bond length is adequate. IWA-2200, looking for proper installation and correct
Details of such tests should also be included in the location.
Procedure Qualification Record.
(4) Ligament distortion caused by explosive weld-
ing is unacceptable when the adjacent tube I.D. is
reduced below the diameter of the tube plug. IWA-4712 Fusion Welding
(5) The procedure shall be considered qualified if The requirements of IWA-4712.1 through IWA-
all 10 of the required, consecutively made explosive 4712.5 shall be met when manual, machine, or automatic
welds are found to be acceptable. welding is used to join plugs to Class 1 heat exchanger
IWA-4711.2.2 Performance Qualifications. Tube tubes of P-Nos. 8 and 4x material or tubesheet holes
plugging by explosive welding shall be performed by of austenitic stainless steel or nickel base material.
welding operators who have first been qualified in
accordance with the following requirements. IWA-4712.1 Material Requirements
(a) Required Tests. The welding operator shall pre- (a) Material shall be in accordance with the require-
pare (if applicable), install, and detonate consecutively ments of an SA, SB, SFA, or any other material
a minimum of five plugs in conformance with an specification accepted for use by Section III. Material
explosive plug Welding Procedure Specification. Ac- produced to a weld filler metal chemistry shall meet
ceptance of these plug welds qualifies the operator the filler material requirements of NB-2000.
for welding with all other explosive plug welding (b) Material shall be traceable to a Certified Material
procedures. Test Report (CMTR).
(b) Examination of Test Assembly. The five plugs
IWA-4712.2 Welding Qualifications. Welding Pro-
shall be examined in accordance with the requirements
cedure Specifications (WPS) and welders or welding
of IWA-4711.2.1(d). All five welds must meet these
operators shall be qualified in accordance with Section
acceptance standards for performance qualification to
IX and the additional requirements and exceptions of
be accepted.
this Subparagraph.
(c) Renewal of Qualification. Renewal of qualifica-
(a) Procedure Qualification
tion of an explosive plug welding operator’s perform-
(1) Welds shall be made using the shielded metal-
ance is required when the operator has not used the
arc welding (SMAW), gas tungsten-arc welding
process for six months or longer, or when there is
(GTAW), or gas metal-arc welding (GMAW) process.
specific reason to question his ability to make quality
Short-circuiting arc GMAW shall not be used.
welds in accordance with the procedure. Renewal of
(2) A separate qualification is required for any
qualification shall be identical to the initial qualification,
change in the P-Number, A-Number, or F-Number of
except that only one tube plug explosive weld need
the plug, tube, sleeve, filler metal, or cladding. A
be made.
separate qualification is also required when the material
IWA-4711.3 Plugging Procedure Specification. The has no P-Number, A-Number, or F-Number. If the
written plugging procedure specification shall delineate plug is welded to the cladding, the cladding shall be
all the requirements of the repair /replacement activity, considered base material.
including the following: (3) The following essential variables, in addition
(a) safety requirements to those specified by Section IX, apply and shall be
(b) plug material, dimensions, and certification re- listed on the WPS:
quirements (a) a change of more than 1⁄16 in. in the extension
(c) essential and nonessential variables of the explo- or recess of either the tube relative to the tubesheet
sive welding process or the plug relative to the material being joined (tube,
(d) preparation or cleaning of the plug, tube, and sleeve, or tubesheet) (see Fig. IWA-4712.2-1);
tubesheet bore hole, if required (b) 10% change in the plug thickness at the
(e) detonation of the charge weld location;
67
Fig. IWA-4712.2-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
68
IWA-4712.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4721.2
(c) 10% change in the nominal wall thickness (d) An addition or deletion of preplaced metal
of the tube or sleeve, when the plug is welded to the inserts.
tube or sleeve; (5) Essential variables for welding operators shall
(d) decrease of 10% or more in the specified be in accordance with Section IX, QW-360.
width of the ligament between tube holes when the (6) Renewal of qualification is required when the
specified width is less than 3⁄8 in. (10 mm) or three welder or welding operator has not performed plugging
times the specified tube wall thickness, whichever is using the process for which he is qualified for 6 months
greater. or longer, or when there is a specific reason to question
(4) The tubesheet in the test assembly shall be at his ability to make quality welds in accordance with
least as thick as the production tubesheet, but need the WPS. Renewal of qualification shall be identical
not exceed 11⁄2 in. (38 mm). to the initial qualification, except that only one weld
(5) The welding of the procedure qualification test need be made.
assembly shall simulate the welding position of the
IWA-4712.3 Plugging Procedure. Each plug opera-
production tubesheet. tion shall be performed in accordance with a procedure
(6) In lieu of the examination and test requirements delineating the requirements of the complete repair /
of Section IX, five consecutive welds of the test assem- replacement activity, including the following:
bly shall be examined using a liquid penetrant method (a) plug material, dimensions, and material certifica-
in accordance with IWA-2200 and shall meet the accept- tion requirements;
ance standards of NB-5350. These welds shall then be (b) the preparation necessary for the joint to be
cross sectioned longitudinally through the center of plugged, including examination requirements and a
each plug. The thickness of the assembly may be means for removal of surface oxide;
reduced to facilitate sectioning. One section of each (c) requirements for preparation (sizing) of the tube
plug shall be polished, etched with a suitable etchant, or tubesheet hole I.D. prior to setting plugs, including
and visually examined at 10X magnification. The weld examination requirements;
throat and minimum leakage path shall not be less (d) requirements for inserting the plug into position
than that required by the Construction Code and Owner’s for welding, including examination requirements;
Requirements. The welds shall be free of cracks and (e) the qualified WPS;
lack of fusion. Porosity shall not reduce the weld (f) requirements for final examination.
throat below the required minimum thickness in the
leakage path. IWA-4712.4 Examination. Final examination of heat
(b) Performance Qualification exchanger plugs and welds shall consist of a VT-1
(1) The test assembly for performance qualification visual examination.
for welders and welding operators shall be the same IWA-4712.5 Records. Records shall be maintained
as for any welding procedure qualification in accordance by the Owner in accordance with IWA-4180 and IWA-
with the requirements of IWA-4712.2(a) 6000, and shall include the following:
(2) For welders and welding operators, five consec- (a) Welding Procedure Specification (WPS)
utive acceptable welds shall be made and examined in (b) Procedure Qualification Record (PQR)
accordance with IWA-4712.2(a)(6). The performance (c) performance qualification records
qualification shall be made in accordance with a WPS (d) Certified Material Test Reports (CMTR)
that has been qualified in accordance with the require- (e) location of plugged tubes or tubesheet holes
ments of IWA-4712.2(a). (f) results of examinations required by IWA-4712
(3) Welders and welding operators shall be tested
under conditions that simulate the weld area access.
Such simulated conditions shall include radiation protec-
IWA-4720 SLEEVING
tion gear.
(4) Essential variables for welders shall be as IWA-4721 General Requirements
follows:
IWA-4721.1 Sleeves. The sleeves shall meet the
(a) A change from one welding process to any
requirements of IWA-4200. The exemptions of IWA-
other welding process.
4130 shall not apply.
(b) A change in F-number of filler material.
(c) A change in P-number of either of the base IWA-4721.2 Sleeving Procedure Specification.
materials. Each sleeving operation shall be performed in accord-
69
IWA-4721.2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-4722.2.1
ance with a sleeving procedure specification (SPS) that IWA-4721.3.2 Sleeving Performance Qualifi-
defines the following: cation
(a) sleeve and tube materials and dimensions; (a) Sleeve attachment processes shall be performed
(b) requirements for preparation of the tube inside by welders, brazers, or equipment operators that have
surface prior to insertion of the sleeve, including exami- been qualified in accordance with this Subsubarticle.
nation requirements and acceptance criteria; (b) Manual process qualification shall be performed
(c) requirements for inserting the sleeve into position, under conditions simulating the restricted access of the
including examination requirements and acceptance cri- production joint.
teria; (c) Renewal of performance qualification is required
(d) the essential and nonessential variables of IWA- when the welder, brazer, or equipment operator has
4721.3 and the welding or brazing process used; not used the process for more than 6 months, or when
(e) required sleeve attachment dimensions; there is any reason to question his ability to make
(f) requirements for final examination and acceptance quality attachments in accordance with SPS. Renewal of
criteria; qualifications shall be identical to the initial qualification
(g) the sequence of operations. except that only one sleeve attachment shall be made.
IWA-4721.4 Sleeving by a Combination of Pro-
cesses. If a combination of processes is used for sleeve
IWA-4721.3 Qualification installation, either at opposite ends of a single sleeve
IWA-4721.3.1 Sleeving Procedure Specification or as a sequence of processes in a single attachment,
Qualification. The SPS shall be qualified in accordance IWA-4722, IWA-4723, IWA-4724, or IWA-4725, as
with this Subsubparagraph, and shall be requalified applicable, apply to each process used. The SPS shall
for any change in an essential variable. Nonessential require that the processes used during production sleev-
variables may be changed without requalification pro- ing be performed in the same sequence as used during
vided the SPS is amended to show the changes. qualification.
(a) The following essential variables apply to all IWA-4721.5 Records. The following records, in
sleeve installation processes, in addition to those listed addition to those required by IWA-4180 and IWA-
for each sleeve attachment process in IWA-4722, IWA- 6000, shall be maintained by the Owner:
4723, IWA-4724, and IWA-4725: (a) SPS;
(1) a change in the P-Number classification of any (b) procedure qualification for the attachment process;
of the materials being joined. This includes the tube, (c) performance qualification for each welder, brazer,
sleeve, tubesheet, or equivalent P-Number for tubesheet and equipment operator;
cladding. Materials not having a P-Number classification (d) location records of all sleeved tubes and sleeves;
require a separate qualification. (e) results of all required sleeve installation examina-
(2) a change of 10% or more in nominal tube or tions.
sleeve design wall thickness in the area of the joint;
(3) deletion of tube cleaning prior to sleeve in-
sertion; IWA-4722 Explosive Welding
(4) a change in sleeve attachment location from IWA-4722.1 General Requirements. When explo-
within the tubesheet to beyond the tubesheet or vice sive welding is used for sleeve attachment, the require-
versa; ments of IWA-4722.2 through IWA-4722.4 shall be met.
(5) a change in sleeve attachment location from
IWA-4722.2 Explosive Welding Qualification
within the sludge pile to beyond the sludge pile or
vice versa; IWA-4722.2.1 Procedure Qualification
(6) the addition or deletion of postweld or post- (a) Essential Variables
braze heat treatment; (1) a decrease in the distance between the two
(7) a change of more than 10% in the nominal closest simultaneously detonated charges;
tube or sleeve diameter. (2) a decrease in the distance between the two
(b) The following nonessential variable applies to closest individually detonated charges;
all sleeve installation processes, in addition to those (3) an increase in the number of sleeves to be
listed for each sleeve attachment process in IWA-4722, simultaneously welded;
IWA-4723, IWA-4724, and IWA-4725: a change in (4) a change of 10% or more in the explosive
the method of tube cleaning prior to sleeve insertion. density or charge-to-mass ratio;
70
IWA-4722.2.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4723.2.1
(5) a change in the type of explosive; (3) Each tube-to-tubesheet weld shall be examined
(6) a change of 10% or more in the explosive at 10X or greater magnification. The weld shall be
charge mass; acceptable if it is free from explosively produced cracks.
(7) for sleeve attachment within the tubesheet, a (4) Ligament distortion caused by explosive weld-
decrease of 15% or more in the tubesheet ligament; ing is unacceptable when the adjacent tube I.D. is
(8) for sleeve attachment within the tubesheet, a reduced below the diameter of the tube sleeve or
change from a tube that is expanded into contact with minimum diameter specified in the SPS, whichever is
the tubesheet in the area of the weld to a tube that less. Ligament distortion shall not adversely affect the
is not expanded, or vice versa; structural integrity of the tubesheet assembly.
(9) any change in the sleeve design configuration; (5) The procedure shall be qualified if five consecu-
(10) a change of 10% or more in the nominal or tive explosive welds are found to be acceptable.
average clearance (stand-off) between the tube and the
IWA-4722.2.2 Performance Qualification. Explo-
sleeve.
sive welding shall be performed by welding operators
(b) Nonessential Variables
that have been qualified in accordance with the fol-
(1) a change in the P-Number of the tubesheet
lowing:
material when sleeve is not joined to tubesheet;
(a) The welding operator shall prepare, install, and
(2) a change in the tubesheet cladding material
weld a minimum of five sleeve attachments in confor-
when the sleeve is not joined to the cladding and the
mance with an SPS. Acceptance of five consecutive
explosive charge is installed not less than one tube
sleeve welds qualifies the operator for welding using
diameter from the cladding;
any other qualified explosive SPS.
(3) a change in the tube-to-tubesheet joint configu-
(b) The five sleeve welds shall be examined in
ration when the explosive charge is installed not less
accordance with, and meet the acceptance standards
than one tube diameter from the tube-to-tubesheet
of, IWA-4722.2.1(e).
seal weld.
(c) Test Assembly. The procedure shall be qualified IWA-4722.3 Sleeving Procedure Specification. The
using a test assembly that simulates the conditions that SPS shall delineate the requirements of the explosive
will be encountered in production with respect to the welding process.
essential variables.
(d) Test Assembly Within Tubesheet IWA-4722.4 Examination. A final examination of
(1) The test assembly tubesheet thickness shall be the welded sleeve attachment shall confirm that the
at least as thick as the production tubesheet, except attachment is in the correct location and conforms to
that it need not be more than 1 in. greater than the the Construction Code and Owner’s Requirements.
length of the sleeve attachment.
(2) When the explosive charge in the heat ex- IWA-4723 Fusion Welding
changer is to be placed less than one tube diameter
from cladding or a tube-to-tubesheet weld, the qualifica- IWA-4723.1 General Requirements. When fusion
tion test assembly shall contain cladding or tube-to- welding is used for sleeve attachment, the requirements
tubesheet welds, as applicable. of IWA-4723.1.1 through IWA-4723.4 shall be met.
(e) Examination of Test Assembly IWA-4723.1.1 Procedure Qualification. Welds
(1) When cladding or welds are required to be shall be made using the gas tungsten-arc welding
included in the test assembly by IWA-4722.2.1(d)(2), (GTAW), gas-metal arc welding (GMAW), or laser
such cladding and tube-to-tubesheet welds shall be beam welding (LBW) process.
examined by the liquid penetrant method and shall
comply with the acceptance standards NB-5350. IWA-4723.2 Fusion Welding Qualification
(2) Each sleeve weld and tube-to-tubesheet weld, IWA-4723.2.1 Procedure Qualification
when applicable, shall be sectioned longitudinally. After (a) Essential Variables
polishing and etching two faces of a single half-section, (1) For sleeve welds within the tubesheet, when
each explosive weld joint area shall be examined at the ligament thickness between the holes is 3⁄8 in.
50X or greater magnification to determine the length (10 mm) or less, a reduction in ligament thickness of
of the explosive bond. The bond shall be acceptable 10% of the ligament thickness or three times the
if the length of continuous bond between the sleeve specified wall thickness, whichever is less;
and tube on each cross-sectioned face is at least five (2) A change in any essential variable listed for
times the nominal tube wall thickness. the specific welding process in QW-250.
71
IWA-4723.2.1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-4724.4
(b) Test Assembly. The procedure shall be qualified IWA-4723.3 Sleeving Procedure Specification. The
using a test assembly that simulates the conditions that SPS shall delineate all the requirements of the fusion
will be encountered in production with respect to the welding process, including the variables of QW-250.
essential variables.
(c) Test Assembly Within Tubesheet. The test assem- IWA-4723.4 Examination. The welded sleeve attach-
bly tubesheet thickness shall be at least as thick as ment shall be examined to confirm that the attachment
the production tubesheet except that it need not be is in the correct location and conforms to the Construc-
more than 1 in. (25 mm) greater than the length of tion Code and Owner’s Requirements.
the sleeve attachment.
(d) Examination of Test Assembly
(1) Five consecutive welds shall be examined by IWA-4724 Brazing
a liquid penetrant method in accordance with IWA- IWA-4724.1 General Requirements. When brazing
2200 and shall meet the acceptance standards of NB- is used for sleeve attachment, IWA-4724.2 through
5350. Welds inaccessible for liquid penetrant examina- IWA-4724.4 shall be met.
tion may be sectioned longitudinally through the center
of the sleeve prior to performing the liquid penetrant IWA-4724.2 Brazing Qualification
examination.
(2) The five consecutive welds shall also be sec- IWA-4724.2.1 Procedure Qualification. The braz-
tioned longitudinally through the center of each sleeve. ing procedure shall be qualified as required by QB-
The thickness of the assembly may be reduced to 200 and the following:
facilitate sectioning. (a) An additional essential variable is a change in
(3) The two faces of a single half-section shall the designed sleeve installation from free tubes to tubes
be polished, etched with a suitable etchant, and visually that are locked to the tube support plate.
examined at 10X magnification. The weld throat and (b) Test Assembly. The procedure shall be qualified
minimum leakage path shall not be less than that using a test assembly that simulates the conditions that
required by the Construction Code and Owner’s Re- will be encountered in production with respect to the
quirements. The weld shall be free of cracks and lack essential variables.
of fusion. Porosity shall not reduce the weld throat (c) Test Assembly Within Tubesheet. The test assem-
thickness below the required minimum leakage path. bly tubesheet thickness shall be at least as thick as
the production tubesheet except that it need not be
IWA-4723.2.2 Performance Qualification. Weld- more than 1 in. greater than the length of the sleeve
ing shall be performed by welders and welding operators attachment.
that have been qualified in accordance with the fol- (d) Examination of Test Assembly
lowing: (1) Each test specimen shall be examined to con-
(a) The test assembly for the performance qualifica- firm that the braze bond area conforms to the Construc-
tion for welders and welding operators shall be the tion Code and Owner’s Requirements.
same as for any welding procedure qualification in (2) The minimum number of braze joints required
accordance with the requirements of IWA-4723.2.1. for procedure qualification shall be five braze joints
(b) The essential variables for welders and welding made consecutively.
operators shall be in accordance with QW-350 and
IWA-4724.2.2 Performance Qualification. Each
QW-360, respectively, for the process to be employed.
brazer and brazing operator shall be qualified as required
(c) For welders, five consecutive acceptable welds
by QB-300, and each test specimen shall be examined
shall be made and examined in accordance with IWA-
to confirm that the braze bond area conforms to the
4723.2.1(d). For welding operators, one acceptable weld
Construction Code and Owner’s Requirements.
shall be made and examined in accordance with IWA-
4723.2.1(d). The performance qualification shall be IWA-4724.3 Sleeving Procedure Specification. The
made in accordance with a SPS qualified in accordance SPS shall delineate all the requirements of the brazing
with IWA-4723.2.1. process, including the variables of QB-200.
(d) Welders shall be tested under simulated access
conditions. The qualification test mock-up shall effec- IWA-4724.4 Examination. A final examination of
tively simulate the conditions that will be encountered the brazed sleeve attachment shall confirm that the
in production with respect to the essential variables. attachment is in the correct location and conforms to
(e) Retest shall be performed as required by QW-320. the Construction Code and Owner’s Requirements.
72
IWA-4725 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-4725.4
73
ARTICLE IWA-5000
SYSTEM PRESSURE TESTS
74
IWA-5212 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-5222
TABLE IWA-5210-1
REFERENCE PARAGRAPHS FOR SYSTEM PRESSURE TEST AND VISUAL EXAMINATIONS
(VT-2) REQUIREMENTS
(c) The system test conditions shall be maintained for insulated systems, and 10 min for noninsulated
essentially constant during the course of the visual systems or components.
examination, except as provided in IWA-5245. (c) system pneumatic tests — 10 min holding time
(d) When conducting system pressure tests described required after attaining the test pressure.
in IWA-5211(b) and (c), the requirements of IWA-
5260 shall be met.
(e) When portions of a system are subject to system IWA-5214 Preservice Test
pressure tests associated with two different system A preservice system pressure test is not required
functions, the visual examination need only be per- by this Article, except following repair /replacement
formed during the test conducted at the higher of the activities as required by IWA-5120.
test pressures of the respective system function, except
as permitted in IWA-5222.
(f) A system hydrostatic test [IWA-5211(b)] and
IWA-5220 TEST PRESSURIZATION
accompanying visual examination are acceptable in lieu
BOUNDARIES2
of the system leakage test [IWA-5211(a)] and visual
examination. IWA-5221 System Leakage Test Boundary 98
(g) The system test pressure and temperature may
The boundary subject to test pressurization during a
be obtained by using any means that comply with the
system leakage test [IWA-5211(a)] shall extend to those
plant Technical Specifications.
pressure retaining components under operating pressures
during normal system service in accordance with IWB-
IWA-5213 Test Condition Holding Time 5222, IWC-5222, and IWD-5240.
The holding time after pressurization to test condi-
tions, before the visual examinations commence, shall IWA-5222 System Hydrostatic Test Boundary
be as follows:
(a) system leakage tests — no holding time required (a) The boundary subject to test pressurization during
after attaining test pressure and temperature; except a system hydrostatic test [IWA-5211(b)] shall be defined
that for tests required by IWA-4540, a 10 min holding by the system boundary (or each portion of the bound-
time for noninsulated systems or components, or 4 hr ary) within which the components have the same mini-
for insulated systems or components, is required after mum required classification and are designed to the
attaining test pressure and temperature.
(b) system hydrostatic tests — 4 hr holding time 2 The boundary limits are generally defined by the location of the
required after attaining the test pressure and temperature safety class interface valves within the system.
75
IWA-5222 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-5245
same pressure rating as governed by the system function nents) for evidence of leakage, or other areas to which
and the internal fluid operating conditions, respectively. such leakage may be channeled, shall be required.
(b) Systems which share safety functions for different (c) Discoloration or residue on surfaces examined
modes of plant operation, and within which the compo- shall be given particular attention to detect evidence
nent classifications differ, shall be subject to separate of boric acid accumulations from borated reactor coolant
system hydrostatic tests of each portion of the system leakage.
boundary having the same minimum required design
pressure ratings.
(c) Systems designed to operate at different pressures
under several modes of plant operation or post-accident IWA-5243 Components With Leakage Collection
conditions shall be subject to a system hydrostatic test Systems
within the test boundary defined by the operating mode
with the higher pressure. Where leakages from components are normally ex-
(d) Where the respective system design pressure rat- pected and collected (such as valve stems, pump seals,
ings on the suction and discharge sides of system or vessel flange gaskets) the VT-2 visual examination
pumps differ, the system hydrostatic test boundary shall shall be conducted by verifying that the leakage collec-
be divided into two separate boundaries (such as suction tion system is operative.
side and discharge side test boundaries). In the case
of positive displacement pumps, the boundary interface
shall be considered as the pump. In the case of centrifu-
gal pumps, the boundary interface shall be the first IWA-5244 Buried Components
shutoff valve on the discharge side of the pump. (a) For buried components surrounded by an annulus,
the VT-2 visual examination shall consist of an examina-
tion for evidence of leakage at each end of the annulus
IWA-5240 VISUAL EXAMINATION and at low point drains.
(b) For buried components where a VT-2 visual
IWA-5241 Noninsulated Components examination cannot be performed, the examination re-
(a) The VT-2 visual examination shall be conducted quirement is satisfied by the following:
by examining the accessible external exposed surfaces of (1) The system pressure test for buried components
pressure retaining components for evidence of leakage. that are isolable by means of valves shall consist of
(b) For components whose external surfaces are inac- a test that determines the rate of pressure loss. Alterna-
cessible for direct VT-2 visual examination, only the tively, the test may determine the change in flow
examination of the surrounding area (including floor between the ends of the buried components. The accept-
areas or equipment surfaces located underneath the able rate of pressure loss or flow shall be established
components) for evidence of leakage shall be required. by the Owner.
(2) The system pressure test for nonisolable buried
components shall consist of a test to confirm that flow
IWA-5242 Insulated Components during operation is not impaired.
(3) Test personnel need not be qualified for VT-
(a) For systems borated for the purpose of controlling 2 visual examination.
reactivity, insulation shall be removed from pressure
retaining bolted connections for VT-2 visual examina-
tion. For other components, a VT-2 visual examination
may be conducted without the removal of insulation
IWA-5245 Elevated Temperature Tests
by examining the accessible and exposed surfaces and
joints of the insulation. Essentially vertical surfaces of The visual examination of system components requir-
insulation need only be examined at the lowest elevation ing a test temperature above 200°F (93°C) during the
where leakage may be detectable. Essentially horizontal system pressure test may be conducted after the pressure
surfaces of insulation shall be examined at each insula- holding period of IWA-5213 is satisfied, and the pres-
tion joint. sure is lowered to the level corresponding with a
(b) When examining insulated components, the exam- temperature of 200°F (93°C), in accordance with allow-
ination of the surrounding area (including floor areas able cooldown rates established by fracture prevention
or equipment surfaces located underneath the compo- criteria.
76
IWA-5250 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-5400
A99 IWA-5250 CORRECTIVE ACTION and that are conducted within a period not exceeding
2 weeks.
(a) The sources of leakage detected during the con-
duct of a system pressure test shall be located and
evaluated by the Owner for corrective action as follows. IWA-5264 Ranges
(1) Buried components with leakage losses in ex-
cess of limits acceptable for continued service shall be (a) Analog pressure gages used in testing shall have
corrected by repair /replacement activities. dials graduated over a range of at least 1.5 times, but
(2) If leakage occurs at a bolted connection in a not more than 4 times, the intended maximum test
system borated for the purpose of controlling reactivity, pressures.
one of the bolts shall be removed, VT-3 examined, (b) Digital pressure measuring instruments used in
and evaluated in accordance with IWA-3100. The bolt testing shall be selected such that the intended maximum
selected shall be the one closest to the source of leakage. test pressure shall not exceed 70% of the calibrated
When the removed bolt has evidence of degradation, all range of the instrument.
remaining bolting in the connection shall be removed,
VT-3 examined, and evaluated in accordance with IWA-5265 Location
IWA-3100.
(3) Components requiring correction shall have (a) When testing an isolated component, the pressure
repair /replacement activities performed in accordance measuring instrument or sensor shall be connected close
with IWA-4000. to the component.
(b) If boric acid residues are detected on components, (b) When testing a group of components or a multi-
the leakage source and the areas of general corrosion component system, the pressure measuring instrument
shall be located. Components with local areas of general or sensor shall be connected to any point within the
corrosion that reduce the wall thickness by more than pressure boundary of the components or system such
10% shall be evaluated to determine whether the compo- that the imposed pressure on any component, including
nent may be acceptable for continued service, or whether static head, will not exceed 106% of the specified test
repair /replacement activities will be performed. pressure for the system; even though the specified test
pressure may not be achieved at the highest elevations
in the system.
IWA-5260 INSTRUMENTS FOR SYSTEM
HYDROSTATIC TESTS
IWA-5300 TEST RECORDS
IWA-5261 Type
The record of the visual examination conducted
Any pressure measuring instrument or sensor, analog
during a system pressure test shall include the procedure
or digital, including the pressure measuring instrument documenting the system test condition and system
of the normal operating system instrumentation (such
pressure boundary. Any source of leakage or evidence
as control room instruments), may be used, provided of structural distress shall be itemized, and the location
the requirements of IWA-5260 are met. and corrective action documented.
IWA-5262 Accuracy
The pressure measuring instrument or sensor used
IWA-5400 PRESSURE TESTING OF CLASS A99
77
77.1
78
(b) The inservice inspection summary report shall identifying film artifacts that might appear as material
be submitted within 90 calendar days of the completion discontinuities in the reproduction.
of each refueling outage.
79
applied stress () — a stress resolvable into membrane bobbin coil — a circular inside diameter eddy current
and bending components and including pressure, ther- coil wound such that the coil is concentric with the
mal, discontinuity, and residual effects acting at the tube during examination
flaw location buried component or support — a component or support
appurtenance — an item to be attached to a stamped that is buried or concrete encased
component that has work performed on it requiring cold shutdown — see plant technical specifications
verification by an Inspector
commercial service — nuclear power plant operation
assess — to determine by evaluation of data compared
commencing with the date the power unit is determined
with previously obtained data such as operating data
by the Owner to be available for the regular production
or design specifications
of electricity
Authorized Inspection Agency — an organization that
is empowered by an enforcement authority to provide component — an item in a nuclear power plant such
inspection personnel and services as required by this as a vessel, pump, valve, or piping system
Section component standard support — a support consisting
Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector — a person who of one or more generally mass-produced units usually
is employed and has been qualified by an Authorized referred to as catalog items
Inspection Agency to verify that examinations, tests, component support — a metal support designed to
and repair /replacement activities (that do not include transmit loads from a component to the load-carrying
welding or brazing) are performed in accordance with building or foundation structure. Component supports
the requirements of this Section include piping supports and encompass those structural
Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector Supervisor — elements relied upon to either support the weight or
a person who is employed by an Authorized Inspection provide structural stability to components.
Agency to supervise Authorized Nuclear Inservice In- constant load type support — spring type support
spectors and who is qualified as an Authorized Nuclear that produces a relatively constant supporting force
Inservice Inspector throughout a specified deflection
Authorized Nuclear Inspector — an employee of an
construction — an all-inclusive term comprising materi-
Authorized Inspection Agency who has been qualified
als, design, fabrication, examination, testing, inspection,
in accordance with NCA-5000 of Section III
and certification required in the manufacture and instal-
beltline region — the region of the reactor vessel (shell lation of items
material including welds, heat affected zones, and plates
or forgings) that directly surrounds the effective height Construction Code — nationally recognized Codes,
of the active core and adjacent regions of the reactor Standards, and Specifications (e.g., ASME, ASTM,
vessel that are predicted to experience sufficient neutron USAS, ANSI, API, AWWA, AISC, MSS, AWS) includ-
radiation damage to be considered in the selection of ing designated Cases, providing construction require-
the most limiting material with regard to radiation ments for an item
damage core support structures — those structures or parts of
bending stress (b) — component of primary stress structures that are designed to provide direct support
proportional to distance from centroid of solid section. It or restraint of the core (fuel and blanket assemblies)
excludes discontinuity stresses and stress concentrations. within the reactor pressure vessel
80
crack arrest fracture toughness (KIa) — the critical examination category — a grouping of items to be
value of the stress intensity factor (KI) for crack arrest examined or tested
as a function of temperature explosive welding — a solid state welding process
crack tip — the extremity of the flaw. The boundary wherein coalescence is produced by the application of
between the flaw and the adjacent material at the pressure by means of an explosive
intersection of the two flaw faces. fabrication — actions such as forming, machining,
critical flaw size — the flaw size that will cause assembling, welding, brazing, heat treating, examination,
failure under a specified load calculated using fracture testing, inspection, and certification, but excluding de-
mechanics. The minimum critical flaw size for normal sign, required to manufacture components, parts, or
or upset conditions (Service Level A and B) is ac; the appurtenances
minimum critical initiation flaw size for emergency and Faulted Conditions — those operating conditions associ-
faulted conditions is ai. ated with extremely low probability postulated events
defect — a flaw (imperfection or unintentional disconti- (Service Level D)
nuity) of such size, shape, orientation, location, or flaw — an imperfection or unintentional discontinuity
properties as to be rejectable that is detectable by nondestructive examination
design life — the period of time for which a component flaw aspect ratio (a /ø) — the ratio of flaw depth (a)
is designed to meet the criteria set forth in the Design for surface flaws, or one-half of the flaw depth (2a)
Specification for subsurface flaws, to the length of the flaw (ø),
design lifetime — see design life where a, 2a, and ø are the dimensions of the rectangle
circumscribing the flaw. (See Figs. IWA-3310-1 through
Design Report — the design document which shows
IWA-3390-1.)
that the allowable limits stated in the construction code
are not exceeded for the loadings specified in the design flaw depth — the depth is the maximum through-
specification thickness dimension (a or 2a) of the rectangle circum-
scribing the flaw when drawn normal to the surface
Design Specification — a document prepared by the
of the component
Owner or Owner’s Designee which provides a complete
basis for construction in accordance with the construc- fracture initiation — level at which the applied stress
tion code intensity (KI) is equal to or exceeds the fracture tough-
ness (KIc)
discontinuity — a lack of continuity or cohesion; an
interruption in the normal physical structure of material general corrosion — an approximately uniform wastage
or a product of a surface of a component, through chemical or
electrochemical action, free of deep pits or cracks
dissimilar metal weld — a weld between (a) carbon
or low alloy steels to high alloy steels, (b) carbon or hanger — an item that carries the weight of components
low alloy steels to high nickel alloys, or (c) high alloy or piping from above with the supporting members
steels to high nickel alloys being mainly in tension
Emergency Conditions — those operating conditions hot functional testing — a series of preoperational tests,
which have a low probability of occurrence (Service prior to reactor criticality, to ensure that the equipment
Level C) meets the design parameters at normal system tempera-
tures and pressures
enforcement authority — a regional or local governing
hot standby — see plant technical specifications
body, such as a State or Municipality of the United
States or a Province of Canada, empowered to enact imperfection — a condition of being imperfect; a depar-
and enforce Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code legislation ture of a quality characteristic from its intended con-
dition
engineering evaluation — an evaluation of indications
that exceed allowable acceptance standards to determine indication — the response or evidence from the applica-
if the margins required by the Design Specifications tion of a nondestructive examination
and Construction Code are maintained inservice examination — the process of visual, surface,
evaluation — the process of determining the significance or volumetric examination performed in accordance
of examination or test results, including the comparison with the rules and requirements of this Division
of examination or test results with applicable acceptance inservice inspection — methods and actions for assuring
criteria or previous results the structural and pressure-retaining integrity of safety-
81
IWA-9000 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWA-9000
related nuclear power plant components in accordance is a time integral of neutron flux at a given location
with the rules of this Section in a component.
inservice life — the period of time from the initial nondestructive examination — an examination by the
use of an item until its retirement from service visual, surface, or volumetric method
inservice test — a test to determine the operational nonplanar flaw — a flaw oriented in more than one
readiness of a component or system plane. It may be curvilinear or a combination of two
inspection — verification of the performance of exami- or more inclined planes. (See Fig. IWA-3340-1.)
nations and tests by an Inspector normal operating conditions — the operating conditions
Inspection Program — the plan and schedule for per- during reactor startup, operation at power, hot standby,
forming examinations or tests and reactor cooldown to cold shutdown conditions. Test
Inspector — an Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector, conditions are excluded.
except for those instances where so designated as an normal plant operation — the conditions of startup,
Authorized Nuclear Inspector hot standby, operation within the normal power range,
installation — those actions required to place and attach and cooldown and shutdown of the plant
components to their supports and join items of a nuclear open ended — a condition of piping or lines that
power system by welding or mechanical means permits free discharge to atmospheric or containment
item — a material, part, appurtenance, piping subassem- atmosphere
bly, component, or component support operational readiness — the ability of a component
KI — see stress intensity factor or system to perform its intended function when required
KIa — see crack arrest fracture toughness overpressure protection — the means by which compo-
nents, or groups of components, are protected from
KIc — see plane strain fracture toughness
overpressure, as required by the applicable Construction
KId — dynamic initiation fracture toughness obtained Code, by the use of pressure relieving devices or other
under fast or rapidly applied loading conditions design provisions
KIR — the crack growth resistance (fracture toughness) Owner — the organization legally responsible for the
expressed in units corresponding to KI. The value of construction and /or operation of a nuclear facility in-
KIR defined in Appendix G is the lesser of KIc and cluding but not limited to one who has applied for,
KIa for the material and temperature involved. or who has been granted, a construction permit or
laminar flaw — planar flaws that are oriented within operating license by the regulatory authority having
10 deg. of a plane parallel to the surface of the lawful jurisdiction
component. (See Fig. IWA-3360-1.) Owner’s Requirements — those technical requirements
linear flaw — a flaw having finite length and narrow prepared by or for the Owner that define the material,
uniform width and depth. (See Fig. IWA-3400-1.) design, fabrication, and examination requirements for
lowest service temperature — the minimum temperature an item in excess of Construction Code requirements
of the fluid retained by a component or, alternatively, when a Construction Code is specified, or in place of
the calculated volumetric average metal temperature a Construction Code when one is not specified
expected during normal operation, whenever the pres- planar flaw — a flat two-dimensional flaw oriented in
sure within the component exceeds 20% of the preopera- a plane other than parallel to the surface of the compo-
tional system hydrostatic test pressure nent. (See Fig. IWA-3310-1.)
material — metallic materials manufactured to an SA, plane strain fracture toughness (KIc) — the material
SB, or SFA specification or any other material specifica- toughness property measured in terms of the stress
tion permitted by this Section or Section III intensity factor, KI, which will lead to nonductile crack
membrane stress (sm) — the component of normal propagation
stress which is uniformly distributed and equal to the post-tensioning — a method of prestressing concrete
average value of stress across the thickness of the in which the tendons are tensioned after the concrete
section under consideration has cured
multiple flaws — two or more proximate discontinuous prestressed concrete — reinforced concrete in which
flaws. They may be planar, coplanar, or separate. there have been introduced internal stresses of such
neutron fluence — the number of fast neutrons per magnitude and distribution that the stresses resulting
unit area received by a cross-sectional component. This from loads are counteracted to a desired degree
82
IWA-9000 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS IWA-9000
RTNDT — the reference nil-ductility transition tempera- support — (1) an item used to position components,
ture established in NB-2330 from drop weight and resist gravity, resist dynamic loading, or maintain equi-
Charpy V-notch tests to account for the effect of librium of components; (2) an item that carries the
irradiation weight of a component or piping from below with the
reconciliation — the process of evaluating and justifying supporting members being mainly in compression
use of alternative Construction Code requirements or support part — a part or subassembly of a component
revised Owner’s Requirements support or piping support
regulatory authority — a federal government agency, surface flaw — a flaw that either penetrates the surface
such as the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commis- or is less than a given distance from the surface. (See
sion, that is empowered to issue and enforce regulations Fig. IWA-3310-1.)
affecting the design, construction, and operation of tendon — an assembly of prestressing steel, anchorages,
nuclear power plants and couplings, which imparts prestressing forces to
reinforced concrete — concrete containing reinforce- concrete
ment and designed so that the two materials act together terminal ends — the extremities of piping runs that
in resisting force connect to structures, components, or pipe anchors,
relevant condition — a condition observed during a each of which acts as a rigid restraint or provides at
visual examination that requires supplemental examina- least 2 degrees of restraint to piping thermal expansion
tion, corrective measure, correction by repair /replace- test — a procedure to obtain information through
ment activities, or analytical evaluation measurement or observation to determine the operational
Repair /Replacement Organization — the organization readiness of a component or system while under con-
that performs repair /replacement activities under the trolled conditions
provisions of the Owner’s Quality Assurance Program.
text information — information stored on the recording
The Owner may be the Repair /Replacement Organi-
media to support recorded eddy current data. Examples
zation.
include tube and steam generator identifications, opera-
rerating — a nonphysical change to an item or piping tor name, date of examination, and examination results.
system done by changing its design ratings (e.g., internal
unbonded tendons — tendons in which the prestressing
or external pressure or temperature). Rerating covers
steel is permanently free to move relative to the concrete
pressure boundary items, core supports, and component
to which they are applying prestressing forces
supports
unit of data storage — each discrete physical recording
safety function — a function that is necessary to ensure
medium on which eddy current data and text information
(1) the integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary,
are stored. Examples include tape cartridge and
(2) the capability to shut down the reactor and maintain
floppy disk.
it in a safe shutdown condition, or (3) the capability
to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents that variable spring type support — a spring type support
could result in potential offsite exposures comparable to providing a variable supporting force throughout a
the guideline exposures of 10CFR100 specified deflection
seal weld — a nonstructural weld intended to prevent verify — to determine that a particular action has been
leakage, where the strength is provided by a separate performed in accordance with the rules and requirements
means of this Section either by witnessing the action or by
stress — the intensity of the internal forces or compo- reviewing records
nents of forces that act on a plane through a given vibration control and sway brace — a spring type
point. Stress is expressed in force per unit area. support providing a variable restraining force along
stress intensity factor (KI) — a measure of the stress- its axis
field intensity near the tip of an ideal crack in a linear welded joint category — the location of a joint in a
elastic medium when deformed so that the crack faces vessel used for specifying required examinations. The
are displaced apart, normal to the crack plane (opening categories are designated as A, B, C, and D as defined
mode or mode I deformation). KI is directly proportional in NE-3351.
to applied load and depends on specimen geometry. yield strength (sy) — the stress at which a material
Structural Integrity Test — the initial or subsequent exhibits a specified limiting deviation from the linear
pressure test of a containment structure to demonstrate proportionality of stress to strain. The deviation is
the ability to withstand the prescribed loads expressed in terms of strain (generally 0.2%).
83
SUBSECTION IWB
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1
COMPONENTS OF LIGHT-WATER
COOLED PLANTS
85
IWB-3132.1 Acceptance by Volumetric or Surface Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
IWB-3132.2 Acceptance by Repair /Replacement Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
IWB-3132.3 Acceptance by Analytical Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
IWB-3133 Repair /Replacement Activity and Reexamination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
IWB-3134 Review by Authorities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3140 Inservice Visual Examinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3141 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3142 Acceptance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3142.1 Acceptance by Visual Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3142.2 Acceptance by Supplemental Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3142.3 Acceptance by Corrective Measures or Repair /Replacement Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3142.4 Acceptance by Analytical Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3143 Repair /Replacement Activity and Reexamination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3144 Review by Authorities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3200 Supplemental Examinations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
IWB-3400 Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
IWB-3410 Acceptance Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
IWB-3410.1 Application of Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
IWB-3410.2 Modification of Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
IWB-3420 Characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
IWB-3430 Acceptability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
IWB-3500 Acceptance Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
IWB-3510 Standards for Examination Category B-A, Pressure Retaining Welds in
Reactor Vessel, and Examination Category B-B, Pressure Retaining Welds
in Vessels Other Than Reactor Vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
IWB-3510.1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
IWB-3510.2 Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
IWB-3510.3 Allowable Linear Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
IWB-3512 Standards for Examination Category B-D, Full Penetration Welds of
Nozzles in Vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
IWB-3512.1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
IWB-3512.2 Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
IWB-3514 Standards for Examination Category B-F, Pressure Retaining Dissimilar
Metal Welds in Vessel Nozzles, and Examination Category B-J, Pressure
Retaining Welds in Piping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
IWB-3514.1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
IWB-3514.2 Allowable Flaw Standards for Ferritic Piping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
IWB-3514.3 Allowable Flaw Standards for Austenitic Piping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
IWB-3514.4 Allowable Flaw Standards for Dissimilar Metal Welds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
IWB-3514.6 Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
IWB-3514.7 Allowable Linear Flaw Standards for Ferritic Piping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
IWB-3515 Standards for Examination Category B-G-1, Pressure Retaining Bolting
Greater Than 2 in. in Diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
IWB-3515.1 Allowable Flaws for Surface Examinations of Studs and Bolts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
IWB-3515.2 Allowable Flaws for Volumetric Examinations of Studs and Bolts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
IWB-3515.3 Allowable Flaws for Volumetric Examinations of Threads in Stud Holes . . . . . . . . . 141
IWB-3516 Standards for Examination Category B-K Welded Attachments for Vessels, Piping,
Pumps, and Valves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
IWB-3516.1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
IWB-3516.2 Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
IWB-3517 Standards for Examination Category B-G-1, Pressure Retaining Bolting
Greater Than 2 in. in Diameter, and Examination Category B-G-2,
Pressure Retaining Bolting 2 in. and Less in Diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
86
IWB-3517.1 Visual Examination, VT-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
IWB-3518 Standards for Examination Category B-L-1 and B-M-1, Pressure Retaining
Welds in Pump Casings and Valve Bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
IWB-3518.1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
IWB-3519 Standards for Examination Category B-L-2, Pump Casings, and Examination
Category B-M-2, Valve Bodies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
IWB-3519.1 Visual Examination, VT-3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
IWB-3520 Standards for Examination Category B-N-1, Interior of Reactor Vessel,
Examination Category B-N-2, Welded Core Support Structures and Interior
Attachments to Reactor Vessels, and Examination Category
B-N-3, Removable Core Support Structures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
IWB-3520.1 Visual Examination, VT-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
IWB-3520.2 Visual Examination, VT-3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
IWB-3521 Standards for Examination Category B-Q, Steam Generator Tubes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
IWB-3521.1 Allowable Flaws for U-Tube Steam Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
IWB-3521.2 Allowable Flaws for Straight-Tube Steam Generators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
IWB-3522 Standards for Examination Category B-P, All Pressure Retaining Components . . . . . 146
IWB-3522.1 Visual Examination, VT-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
IWB-3523 Standards for Examination Category B-O, Pressure Retaining Welds in
Control Rod Drive Housings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
IWB-3523.1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
IWB-3523.2 Allowable Flaw Standards for Surface Examination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
IWB-3523.3 Allowable Flaw Standards for Volumetric Examination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
IWB-3600 Analytical Evaluation of Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
IWB-3610 Acceptance Criteria for Ferritic Steel Components 4 in. and Greater in
Thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
IWB-3611 Acceptance Criteria Based on Flaw Size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
IWB-3612 Acceptance Criteria Based on Applied Stress Intensity Factor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
IWB-3613 Acceptance Criteria for Flanges and Shell Regions Near Structural
Discontinuities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
IWB-3620 Acceptance Criteria for Ferritic Components Less Than 4 in. in
Thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
IWB-3630 Acceptance Criteria for Steam Generator Tubing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
IWB-3640 Evaluation Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Austenitic Piping . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
IWB-3641 Evaluation Procedures Based on Flaw Size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
IWB-3641.1 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
IWB-3641.2 Evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
IWB-3641.3 Acceptance Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
IWB-3642 Evaluation Procedure Based on Applied Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152
IWB-3650 Evaluation Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Flaws in Ferritic
Piping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
IWB-3651 Evaluation Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
IWB-3652 Acceptance Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
IWB-3700 Analytical Evaluation of Plant Operating Events. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
IWB-3710 Scope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
IWB-3720 Unanticipated Operating Events. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
IWB-3730 Fracture Toughness Criteria for Protection Against Failure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
IWB-3740 Operating Plant Fatigue Assessments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
87
IWB-5220 System Leakage Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
IWB-5221 Pressure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
IWB-5222 Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
IWB-5230 Hydrostatic Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
IWB-5240 Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
Figures
IWB-2500-1 Vessel Shell Circumferential Weld Joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
IWB-2500-2 Vessel Shell Longitudinal Weld Joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
IWB-2500-3 Spherical Vessel Head Circumferential and Meridional Weld Joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
IWB-2500-4 Shell-to-Flange Weld Joint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
IWB-2500-5 Head-to-Flange Weld Joint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
IWB-2500-6 Typical Tubesheet-to-Head Weld Joints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
IWB-2500-7(a) Nozzle in Shell or Head. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
IWB-2500-7(b) Nozzle in Shell or Head. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
IWB-2500-7(c) Nozzle in Shell or Head. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
IWB-2500-7(d) Nozzle in Shell or Head. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
IWB-2500-8 Similar and Dissimilar Metal Welds in Components, Nozzles, and Piping. . . . . . . . . 121
IWB-2500-9 Pipe Branch Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
IWB-2500-10 Pipe Branch Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
IWB-2500-11 Pipe Branch Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
IWB-2500-12 Closure Stud and Threads in Flange Stud Hole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
IWB-2500-13 Welded Attachment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127
IWB-2500-14 Welded Attachment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
IWB-2500-15 Welded Attachment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
IWB-2500-16 Pump Casing Weld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
IWB-2500-17 Valve Body Welds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
IWB-2500-18 Control Rod Drive Housing Welds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
IWB-2500-20 Extent of Weld Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
IWB-3610-1 Characterization and Proximity Rules for Analytical Evaluation of Clad
Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
IWB-3641-1 Weld Material–Base Material Interface Definition for Flaw Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
Tables
IWB-2411-1 Inspection Program A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
IWB-2412-1 Inspection Program B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
IWB-2500-1 Examination Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
IWB-3410-1 Acceptance Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
IWB-3510-1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
IWB-3510-2 Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
IWB-3510-3 Allowable Linear Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
IWB-3512-1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
IWB-3512-2 Component Thickness vs Flaw Location. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
IWB-3514-1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
IWB-3514-2 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
IWB-3514-3 Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
IWB-3514-4 Allowable Linear Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
IWB-3515-1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
IWB-3518-1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
IWB-3518-2 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
88
IWB-3641-1 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth to Thickness Ratio for
Circumferential Flaws — Normal Operating (Including Upset and Test)
Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
IWB-3641-2 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth to Thickness Ratio for
Circumferential Flaws — Emergency and Faulted Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
IWB-3641-3 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth to Thickness Ratio for
Axial Flaws — Normal Operating (Including Upset and Test) Conditions. . . . . . . 155
IWB-3641-4 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth to Thickness Ratio for
Axial Flaws — Emergency and Faulted Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
IWB-5230-1 Test Pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
89
ARTICLE IWB-1000
SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITY
1 The exemptions from examination in IWC-1220 may be applied 2 Inpiping is defined as having a cumulative inlet and a cumulative
to those components permitted to be Class 2 in lieu of Class 1 by outlet pipe cross-sectional area neither of which exceeds the nominal
the regulatory authority having jurisdiction at the plant site. OD cross-sectional area of the designated size.
91
ARTICLE IWB-2000
EXAMINATION AND INSPECTION
92
IWB-2411 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-2420
93
IWB-2430 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWB-2500
94
TABLE IWB-2500-1
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
B1.20 Head Welds IWB-2500-3 Volumetric IWB-3510 Accessible length of Same as for Permissible
B1.21 Circumferential all welds2 1st Interval
B1.22 Meridional
B1.30 Shell-to-Flange Weld IWB-2500-4 Volumetric IWB-3510 Weld2 Same as for See Note 3
1st Interval
B1.40 Head-to-Flange Weld IWB-2500-5 Volumetric and surface IWB-3510 Weld2 Same as for See Note 4
95
1st Interval
B1.50 Repair Welds1 IWB-2500-1 Volumetric IWB-3510 All weld repair areas Same as for Permissible
B1.51 Beltline region and -2 1st Interval
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS
NOTES:
(1) Material (base metal) weld repairs where repair depth exceeds 10% nominal of the vessel wall. If the location of the repair is not positively
and accurately known, then the individual shell plate, forging, or shell course containing the repair shall be included.
(2) Includes essentially 100% of the weld length.
(3) When using Inspection Program B, the shell-to-flange weld examination may be performed during the first and third periods, in which
case 50% of the shell-to-flange weld shall be examined by the end of the first period, and the remainder by the end of third period.
During the first period, the examination need only be performed from the flange face, provided this same portion is examined from
the shell during the third period.
(4) Deferral is not permissible for the head-to-flange weld. However, during the first and second periods, the examination need only be
performed from the flange face, provided these same portions are examined from the head during the third period.
Table IWB-2500-1
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY B-B, PRESSURE RETAINING WELDS IN VESSELS OTHER THAN REACTOR VESSELS
B2.20 Head Welds IWB-2500-3 Volumetric IWB-3510 All welds4 One weld per head Not permissible
B2.21 Circumferential
B2.22 Meridional
96
B2.31 Circumferential
B2.32 Meridional
B2.40 Tubesheet-To-Head Weld IWB-2500-6 Volumetric IWB-3510 Weld4 Weld1,4 Not permissible
B2.50 Head Welds Volumetric IWB-3510 All welds4 One weld1 per head Not permissible
B2.51 Circumferential IWB-2500-1,-3
B2.52 Meridional IWB-2500-3
NOTES:
(1) The examination may be limited to one vessel among the group of vessels performing a similar function.
(2) The weld selected for examination is that weld intersecting the circumferential weld.
(3) The initially selected welds are to be examined in the same sequence during successive inspection intervals, to the extent practical.
(4) Includes essentially 100% of the weld length
ASME B&PVC
A99 TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
Pressurizer
B3.30 Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds IWB-2500-74 Volumetric IWB-3512 All nozzles1 Same as for 1st Interval Not permissible
97
Steam Generators (Primary Side)
NOTES:
(1) Includes nozzles with full penetration welds to vessel shell (or head) and integrally cast nozzles, but excludes manways and handholes
either welded to or integrally cast in vessel.
(2) Deferral is permissible during the first and second intervals. During the third and fourth intervals at least 25% but not more than 50%
of the nozzles shall be examined by the end of the second period, and the remainder by the end of the interval.
(3) During the third and fourth intervals, if the nozzle weld is examined by the straight beam ultrasonic method from inside the nozzle bore,
the remaining examinations required from the shell inside diameter may be performed at or near the end of the interval.
(4) The examination volumes shall apply to the applicable Figure shown in Figs. IWB-2500-7(a) through (d).
Table IWB-2500-1
Pressurizer
B3.110 Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds IWB-2500-74 Volumetric IWB-3512 All nozzles1 Same as for 1st Inteval Not permissible
98
B3.130 Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds IWB-2500-74 Volumetric IWB-3512 All nozzles1 Same as for 1st Interval Not permissible
NOTES:
(1) Includes nozzles with full penetration welds to vessel shell (or head) and integrally cast nozzles, but excludes manways and handholes
either welded to or integrally cast in vessel.
(2) At least 25% but more than 50% of the nozzles shall be examined by the end of the first inspection period, and the remainder by the
end of the inspection interval.
(3) If the nozzle weld is examined by the straight beam ultrasonic method from inside the nozzle bore, the remaining examinations required
from the shell inside diameter may be performed at or near the end of the interval.
(4) The examination volumes shall apply to the applicable Figure shown in Figs. IWB-23500-7(a) through (d).
(5) For PWRs in the second and successive inspection intervals, these examinations may be deferred to the end of the interval, provided no
repair/replacement activities have been performed on the examination item, and no flaws or relevant conditions requiring successive
inspections in accordance with IWB-2420(b) are contained in the examination item.
EXAMINATION CATEGORY B-F, PRESSURE RETAINING DISSIMILAR METAL WELDS IN VESSEL NOZZLES
Pressurizer
B5.40 NPS 4 or Larger
99
Nozzle-to-Safe End Butt Welds IWB-2500-8 Volumetric and surface IWB-3514 All welds Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
B5.50 Less Than NPS 4
Nozzle-to-Safe End Butt Welds IWB-2500-8 Surface IWB-3514 All welds Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
B5.60 Nozzle-to-Safe End Socket Welds
IWB-2500-8 Surface IWB-3514 All welds Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS
NOTES:
See Notes at end of Examination Category B-F.
Table IWB-2500-1
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY B-F, PRESSURE RETAINING DISSIMILAR METAL WELDS IN VESSEL NOZZLES (CONT’D)
Steam Generator
B5.70 NPS 4 or Larger
Nozzle-to-Safe End Butt Welds IWB-2500-8 Volumetric and surface IWB-3514 All welds Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
B5.80 Less Than NPS 4
Nozzle-to-Safe End Butt Welds IWB-2500-8 Surface IWB-3514 All welds Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
B5.90 Nozzle-to-Safe End Socket Welds IWB-2500-8 Surface IWB-3514 All welds Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
Heat Exchangers
B5.100 NPS 4 or Larger
100
Nozzle-to-Safe End Butt Welds IWB-2500-8 Volumetric and surface IWB-3514 All welds Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
B5.110 Less Than NPS 4
Nozzle-to-Safe End Butt Welds IWB-2500-8 Surface IWB-3514 All welds Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
B5.120 Nozzle-to-Safe End Socket Welds IWB-2500-8 Surface IWB-3514 All welds Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
NOTES:
(1) Deferral is not permissible during the first interval. However, during successive intervals, the examinations may be performed conicident
witht the vessel nozzle examinations required by Examination Category B-D.
(2) For PWRs in the second and successive inspection intervals, these examinations may be deferred to the end of the interval, provided no
repair/replacement activities have been performed on the examination item, and no flaws or relevant conditions requiring successive inspections
in accordance with IWB-2420(b) are contained in the examination item.
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D) 98
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY B-G-1, PRESSURE RETAINING BOLTING, GREATER THAN 2 in. IN DIAMETER
101
Steam Generators All bolts, studs, Same as for 1st Permissible
B6.90 Bolts and Studs IWB-2500-12 Volumetric IWB-3515 nuts, bushings, interval
B6.100 Flange Surface,4 when Surfaces Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 and flange
B6.110 connection disassembled Surfaces Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 surfaces
Nuts, Bushings, and Washers
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS
NOTES:
See Notes at end of Examination Category B-G-1.
Table IWB-2500-1
98 TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY B-G-1, PRESSURE RETAINING BOLTING, GREATER THAN 2 in. IN DIAMETER (CONT’D)
102
Valves All bolts, studs, Same as for 1st Permissible
B6.210 Bolts and Studs IWB-2500-12 Volumetric IWB-3515 nuts, bushings, interval
B6.220 Flange Surface,4 when connection Surfaces Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 and flange
B6.230 disassembled Surfaces Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 surfaces
Nuts, Bushings, and Washers
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
NOTES:
(1) Bolting may be examined:
(a) in place under tension;
(b) when the connection is disassembled;
(c) when the bolting is removed.
(2) Bushings and threads in base material of flanges are required to be examined only when the connections are disassembled. Bushings may
be inspected in place.
(3) For heat exchangers, piping, pumps, and valves, examinations are limited to components selected for examination under Examination
Categories B-B, B-J, B-L-2, and B-M-2.
(4) Examination includes 1 in. annular surface of flange surrounding each stud.
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY B-G-2, PRESSURE RETAINING BOLTING, 2 in. AND LESS IN DIAMETER
Reactor Vessel
B7.10 Bolts, Studs, and Nuts Surface Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 All bolts, studs, Same as for 1st Not permissible
and nuts interval
Pressurizer
B7.20 Bolts, Studs, and Nuts Surface Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 All bolts, studs, Same as for 1st Not permissible
and nuts interval
Steam Generators
B7.30 Bolts, Studs, and Nuts Surface Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 All bolts, studs, Same as for 1st Not permissible
and nuts interval
Heat Exchangers
B7.40 Bolts, Studs, and Nuts Surface Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 All bolts, studs, Same as for 1st Not permissible
and nuts interval
103
Piping
B7.50 Bolts, Studs, and Nuts Surface Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 All bolts, studs, Same as for 1st Not permissible
and nuts interval
Pumps
B7.60 Bolts, Studs, and Nuts Surface Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 All bolts, studs, Same as for 1st Not permissible
and nuts interval
Valves
B7.70 Bolts, Studs, and Nuts Surface Visual, VT-1 IWB-3517 All bolts, studs, Same as for 1st Not permissible
and nuts interval
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS
NOTES:
(1) Bolting may be examined:
(a) in place under tension;
(b) when the connection is disassembled;
(c) when the bolting is removed.
(2) For heat exchangers, piping, pumps, and valves, examinations are limited to components selected for examination under Examination
Categories B-B, B-J, B-L-2, and B-M-2.
Table IWB-2500-1
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
B9.10 NPS4 or Larger IWB-2500-8 Surface and volumetric IWB-3514 Same as for 1st Not permissible
B9.11 Circumferential Welds Welds1,3,4,5,6 interval
B9.20 Less Than NPS 4 IWB-2500-8 Surface IWB-3514 Welds1,3,4 Same as for 1st Not permissible
B9.21 Circumferential Welds interval
B9.30 Branch Pipe Connection Welds IWB-3514 Same as for 1st Not permissible
B9.31 NPS 4 or Larger IWB-2500-9, Surface and volumetric Welds1,3,4,5,6 interval
B9.32 Less Than NPS 4 -10, and -11 Surface Welds1,3,4
B9.40 Socket Welds IWB-2500-8 Surface IWB-3514 Welds1,3 Same as for 1st Not permissible
interval
104
NOTES:
(1) Examinations shall include the following:
(a) All terminal ends in each pipe or branch run connected to vessels.
(b) All terminal ends and joints in each pipe or branch run connected to other components where the stress levels exceed either of the
following limits under loads associated with specific seismic events and operational conditions:
(1) primary plus secondary stress intensity range of 2.4Sm for ferritic steel and austenitic steel
(2) cumulative usage factor U of 0.4
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
(c) All dissimilar metal welds not covered under Category B-F.
(d) Additional piping welds so that the total number of circumferential butt welds (or branch connection or socket welds) selected for
examination equals 25% of the circumferential butt welds (or branch connection or socket welds) in the reactor coolant piping system.
This total does not include welds excluded by IWB-1220. These additional welds may be located in one loop (one loop is defined for
both PWR and BWR plants in the 1977 Edition).
(2) The initially selected welds are to be examined in the same sequence during successive inspection intervals, to the extent practical.
(3) Includes essentially 100% of weld length.
(4) For circumferential welds with intersecting longitudinal welds, surface examination of the longitudinal piping welds is required for those
portions of the welds within the examination boundaries of intersecting Examination Category B-F and B-J circumferential welds.
(5) For circumferential welds with intersecting longitudinal welds, volumetric examination of the longitudinal piping welds is required for those
portions of the welds within the examination boundaries of intersecting Examination Category B-F and B-J circumferential welds. The
following requirements shall also be met:
(a) When longitudinal welds are specified and locations are known, examination requirements shall be met for both transverse and parallel
flaws at the intersection of the welds and for that length of longitudinal weld within the circumferential weld examination volume.
(b) When longitudinal welds are specified but locations are unknown, or the existence of longitudinal welds is uncertain, the examination
requirements shall be met for both transverse and parallel flaws within the entire examination volume of intersecting circumferential welds.
(6) For welds in carbon or low alloy steels, only those welds showing reportable preservice transverse indications need to be examined by the
ultrasonic method for reflectors transverse to the weld length direction except that circumferential welds with intersecting longitudinal
welds shall meet Note (5).
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY B-K, WELDED ATTACHMENTS FOR VESSELS, PIPING, PUMPS, AND VALVES
Pressure Vessels
B10.10 Welded Attachments IWB-2500-13, Surface7 IWB-3516 Each welded attach- Same as for 1st Not permissible
-14, and -15 ment and each iden- interval
tified occurrence4
Piping
B10.20 Welded Attachments IWB-2500-13, Surface IWB-3516 Each welded attach- Same as for 1st Not permissible
-14, and -15 ment and each iden- interval
tified occurrence5
Pumps
B10.30 Welded Attachments IWB-2500-13, Surface IWB-3516 Each welded attach- Same as for 1st Not permissible
-14, and -15 ment and each iden- interval
tified occurrence5
105
Valves
B10.40 Welded Attachments IWB-2500-13, Surface IWB-3516 Each welded attach- Same as for 1st Not permissible
-14, and -15 ment and each iden- interval
tified occurrence5
NOTES:
(1) Weld buildup on nozzles that is in compression under normal conditions and provides only component support is excluded from examination.
Examination is limited to those welded attachments that meet the following conditions:
(a) the attachment is on the outside surface of the pressure retaining component;
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS
EXAMINATION CATEGORY B-L-1, PRESSURE RETAINING WELDS IN PUMP CASINGS; B-M-1, PRESSURE RETAINING
Table IWB-2500-1
Valves
B12.30 Valves, Less Than NPS 4
Valve Body Welds (B-M-1) IWB-2500-17 Surface WIB-3518 All welds3,4 Same as for 1st Permissible
interval
106
B12.40 Valves, NPS 4 or Larger
Valve Body Welds (B-M-1) IWB-2500-17 Volumetric IWB-3518 All welds3,4 Same as for 1st Permissible
interval
B12.50 Valve Body, Exceeding NPS 4 Internal Visual, VT-3 IWB-3519 Internal surface3 Same as for 1st See Note 2
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
NOTES:
(1) Examinations are limited to at least one pump in each group of pumps performing similar functions in the system, e.g., recirculating
coolant pumps.
(2) Examination is required only when a pump or valve is disassembled for maintenance, repair, or volumetric examination. Examination
of the internal pressure boundary shall include the internal pressure retaining surfaces made accessible for examination by disassembly.
If a partial examination is performed and a subsequent disassembly of that pump or valve allows a more extensive examination, an
examination shall be performed during the subsequent disassembly. A complete examination is required only once during the interval.
(3) Examinations are limited to at least one valve within each group of valves that are of the same size, constructural design (such as
globe, gate, or check valves), and manufacturing method, and that perform similar functions in the system (such as containment
isolation and system overpressure protection).
(4) Includes essentially 100% of weld length.
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
B13.30 Interior Attachments Beyond Accessible Visual, VT-3 IWB-3520.2 Welds Same as for 1st Permissible
Beltline Region (B-N-2) welds interval
107
B13.40 Core Support Structure (B-N-2) Accessible Visual, VT-3 IWB-3520.2 Surfaces Same as for 1st Permissible
surfaces interval
B13.60 Interior Attachments Beyond Accessible Visual, VT-3 IWB-3520.2 Welds Same as for 1st Permissible
Beltline Region (B-N-2) welds interval
B13.70 Core Support Structure2 (B-N-3) Accessible Visual, VT-3 IWB-3520.3 Surfaces Same as for 1st Permissible
surfaces interval
NOTES:
(1) Areas to be examined shall include the spaces above and below the reactor core that are made accessible for examination by removal of
components during normal refueling outages.
(2) The structure shall be removed from the reactor vessel for examination.
(3) At 1st refueling outage, and subsequent refueling outages at approximately 3 year intervals.
Table IWB-2500-1
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
Reactor Vessel
B14.10 Welds in CRD Housing IWB-2500-18 Volumetric or surface IWB-3523 10% peripheral CRD Same as for 1st Permissible
housings interval
108
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY B-P, ALL PRESSURE RETAINING COMPONENTS
1st Deferral of
Item Parts Test Examination Acceptance Inspection Successive Examination to
No. Examined Requirements Method1 Standard Interval Inspection Intervals End of Interval
Reactor Vessel
B15.10 Pressure Retaining Boundary System leakage Visual, VT-2 IWB-3522 Each refueling outage2 Same as for Not permissible
test (IWB- 1st interval
5220)
Pressurizer
B15.20 Pressure Retaining Boundary System leakage Visual, VT-2 IWB-3522 Each refueling outage2 Same as for Not permissible
test (IWB- 1st interval
5220)
Steam Generators
B15.30 Pressure Retaining Boundary System leakage Visual, VT-2 IWB-3522 Each refueling outage2 Same as for Not permissible
test (IWB- 1st interval
5220)
109
Heat Exchangers
B15.40 Pressure Retaining Boundary System leakage Visual, VT-2 IWB-3522 Each refueling outage2 Same as for Not permissible
test (IWB- 1st interval
5220)
Piping
B15.50 Pressure Retaining Boundary System leakage Visual, VT-2 IWB-3522 Each refueling outage2 Same as for Not permissible
test (IWB- 1st interval
5220)
Pumps
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS
B15.60 Pressure Retaining Boundary System leakage Visual, VT-2 IWB-3522 Each refueling outage2 Same as for Not permissible
test (IWB- 1st interval
5220)
Valves
B15.70 Pressure Retaining Boundary System leakage Visual, VT-2 IWB-3522 Each refueling outage2 Same as for Not permissible
test (IWB- 1st interval
5220)
NOTES:
(1) Visual examination of IWA-5240.
(2) The system leakage test (IWB-5220) shall be conducted prior to plant startup following reactor refueling outage.
Table IWB-2500-1
TABLE IWB-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
110
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
NOTES:
* The extent and frequency of examination shall be governed by the plant Technical Specification.
** In the course of preparation.
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-1
111
Fig. IWB-2500-2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
112
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-3
113
Fig. IWB-2500-4 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
114
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-5
115
Fig. IWB-2500-6
116
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
117
Fig. IWB-2500-7(b) 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
118
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-7(c)
119
Fig. IWB-2500-7(d) 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
120
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-8
FIG. IWB-2500-8 SIMILAR AND DISSIMILAR METAL WELDS IN COMPONENTS, NOZZLES, AND PIPING
121
Fig. IWB-2500-8 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
FIG. IWB-2500-8 SIMILAR AND DISSIMILAR METAL WELDS IN COMPONENTS, NOZZLES, AND PIPING
(CONT’D)
122
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-9
123
Fig. IWB-2500-10 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
124
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-11
125
Fig. IWB-2500-12 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
126
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-13
127
Fig. IWB-2500-14 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
128
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-15
129
Fig. IWB-2500-16 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
130
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-17
131
Fig. IWB-2500-18 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
132
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-2500-20
133
ARTICLE IWB-3000
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
134
IWB-3122.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-3133
(b) A component whose visual examination detects (b) When flaws are detected by a required volumetric
the relevant conditions described in the standards of or surface examination, the component is acceptable
Table IWB-3410-1 shall be unacceptable for service, for continued service provided the requirements of
unless such components meet the requirements of IWB- IWB-3112(b) or the acceptance standards of Table
3122.2 or IWB-3122.3 prior to placement of the compo- IWB-3410-1 are met.
nent in service. (c) Volumetric and surface examination results shall
be compared with recorded results of the preservice
IWB-3122.2 Acceptance by Supplemental Exami-
examination and prior inservice examinations. Accept-
nation. A component containing relevant conditions
ance of the components for continued service shall be in
shall be acceptable for service if the results of supple-
accordance with IWB-3132, IWB-3133, and IWB-3134.
mental examinations (IWB-3200) meet the requirements
of IWB-3110.
IWB-3122.3 Acceptance by Corrective Measures IWB-3132 Acceptance
or Repair / Replacement Activity. A component con- IWB-3132.1 Acceptance by Volumetric or Surface
taining relevant conditions is acceptable for service Examination. A component whose volumetric or sur-
if the relevant conditions are corrected by a repair / face examination either reconfirms the absence of flaws
replacement activity or by corrective measures to the or detects flaws that are acceptable under the provisions
extent necessary to meet the acceptance standards of of IWB-3131(b) are acceptable for continued service.
Table IWB-3410-1. Confirmed changes in flaws from prior examinations
shall be recorded in accordance with IWA-1400(h),
IWA-2220(b), and IWA-6230. A component that does
not meet the acceptance standards of Table IWB-3410-
IWB-3123 Repair / Replacement Activity and 1 shall be corrected in accordance with the provisions
Reexamination of IWB-3132.2 or IWB-3132.3.
The repair / replacement activity and reexamination IWB-3132.2 Acceptance by Repair / Replacement
shall comply with the requirements of IWA-4000. Reex- Activity. A component whose volumetric or surface
amination shall be conducted in accordance with the examination detects flaws that exceed the acceptance
requirements of IWA-2200; the recorded results shall standards of Table IWB-3410-1 is unacceptable for
demonstrate that the area subjected to the repair / replace- continued service until the additional examination re-
ment activity meets the acceptance standards of Table quirements of IWB-2430 are satisfied and the component
IWB-3410-1. is corrected by a repair / replacement activity to the
extent necessary to meet the acceptance standards of
IWB-3000.
IWB-3124 Review by Authorities
(a) The Repair / Replacement Program and the reex-
amination results shall be subject to review by the IWB-3132.3 Acceptance by Analytical Evaluation.
enforcement authorities having jurisdiction at the A component whose volumetric or surface examination
plant site. detects flaws that exceed the acceptance standards of
(b) Evaluation of examination results may be subject Table IWB-3410-1 is acceptable for continued service
to review by the regulatory authority having jurisdiction without a repair / replacement activity if an analytical
at the plant site. evaluation, as described in IWB-3600, meets the accept-
ance criteria of IWB-3600. The area containing the
flaw shall be subsequently reexamined in accordance
IWB-3130 INSERVICE VOLUMETRIC AND with IWB-2420(b) and (c).
SURFACE EXAMINATIONS
IWB-3131 General IWB-3133 Repair / Replacement Activity and
Reexamination
(a) The volumetric and surface examinations required
by IWB-2500 and performed in accordance with IWA- The repair / replacement activity and reexamination
2200 shall be evaluated by comparing the examination shall comply with the requirements of IWA-4000. Reex-
results with the acceptance standards specified in Table amination shall be conducted in accordance with the
IWB-3410-1, except where IWB-3131(b) is applicable. requirements of IWA-2200. The recorded results shall
135
IWB-3133 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWB-3200
demonstrate that the area subjected to the repair / replace- IWB-3142.4 Acceptance by Analytical Evaluation.
ment activity meets the acceptance standards of Table A component containing relevant conditions is accept-
IWB-3410-1. able for continued service if an analytical evaluation
demonstrates the component’s acceptability. The evalua-
tion analysis and evaluation acceptance criteria shall
IWB-3134 Review by Authorities be specified by the Owner. A component accepted for
(a) The Repair / Replacement Program and the reex- continued service based on analytical evaluation shall
amination results shall be subject to review by the be subsequently examined in accordance with IWB-
enforcement authorities having jurisdiction at the 2420(b) and (c).
plant site.
(b) Analytical evaluation of examination results as
required by IWB-3132.4 shall be submitted to the
regulatory authority having jurisdiction at the plant site.
136
IWB-3400 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-3430
TABLE IWB-3410-1
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
Examination Acceptance
Category Component and Part Examined Standard
B-A, B-B Vessel welds IWB-3510
B-D Full penetration welded nozzles in vessels IWB-3512
B-F, B-J Dissimilar and similar metal welds in piping and IWB-3514
vessel nozzles
B-G-1 Bolting greater than 2 in. in diameter IWB-3515
IWB-3517
B-G-2 Bolting 2 in. in diameter and less IWB-3517
B-K Welded attachments for vessels, piping, pumps, and IWB-3516
valves
B-L-1, B-M-1 Welds in pumps and valves IWB-3518
B-L-2, B-M-2 Pump casings and valve bodies IWB-3519
B-N-1, B-N-2, B-N-3 Interior surfaces and internal components of reac- IWB-3520
tor vessels
B-O Control rod drive housing welds IWB-3523
B-P Pressure retaining boundary IWB-3522
B-Q Steam generator tubing IWB-3521
IWB-3400 STANDARDS (c) Modified standards shall not allow greater flaw
sizes than those contained in this Article for the applica-
IWB-3410 ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
ble examination category.
The acceptance standards referenced in Table IWB- (d) Modified acceptance standards shall be filed with
3410-1 shall be applied to determine acceptability for the regulatory and enforcement authorities having juris-
service. The following conditions shall apply. diction at the plant site.
IWB-3410.1 Application of Standards
(a) The acceptance standards for ferritic steel compo-
nents shall only be applicable to those components
whose material properties are in accordance with those
stated in the referenced table.
(b) The acceptance standards for ferritic steel compo-
nents shall be applicable where the maximum postulated IWB-3420 CHARACTERIZATION
defect that determines the limiting operating conditions
Each detected flaw or group of flaws shall be charac-
conforms with the recommendations stated in Section
terized by the rules of IWA-3300 to establish the
III, Division 1 — Appendices.
dimensions of the flaws. These dimensions shall be
IWB-3410.2 Modification of Standards used in conjunction with the acceptance standards of
(a) Where less than the maximum postulated defect IWB-3500.
is used, as permitted by Appendix G of Section III,
Division 1 — Appendices, or operating conditions are
modified from those originally assumed, the acceptance
standards of this Article shall be modified.
(b) The Owner shall be responsible for modification
of acceptance standards as necessary to maintain the
equivalent safety margins1 of the acceptance standards
of this Article. IWB-3430 ACCEPTABILITY
Flaws that do not exceed the dimensions of allowable
1 For safety margins included in the acceptance standards, refer to flaws of IWB-3500 for the respective examination
report listed under 8(f)(1) of the Organization of Section XI. category shall be acceptable.
137
IWB-3500 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWB-3510.3
TABLE IWB-3510-1
ALLOWABLE PLANAR FLAWS
Material: Ferritic steels that meet the requirements of NB-2331 and G-2110(b) of Section III
IWB-3500 ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS (d) Surface flaws within cladding are acceptable.
IWB-3510 STANDARDS FOR EXAMINATION
IWB-3510.2 Allowable Laminar Flaws
CATEGORY B-A, PRESSURE
(a) The areas of allowable laminar flaws as defined
RETAINING WELDS IN REACTOR
by IWA-3360 within the boundary of the examination
VESSEL, AND EXAMINATION
zones delineated in the applicable figures specified in
CATEGORY B-B, PRESSURE
IWB-3510-1(a) shall not exceed the limits specified in
RETAINING WELDS IN VESSELS
Table IWB-3510-2.
OTHER THAN REACTOR VESSELS
(b) Laminar flaws that join with a planar flaw shall
IWB-3510.1 Allowable Planar Flaws be governed by the standards of Table IWB-3510-1.
(a) The size of allowable planar flaws within the
boundary of the examination volumes specified in Figs. IWB-3510.3 Allowable Linear Flaws
IWB-2500-1 through IWB-2500-6 shall not exceed the (a) The size of allowable linear flaws as detected
limits specified in Table IWB-3510-1. by a surface examination (MT /PT) or volumetric exami-
(b) Where a flaw extends or lies beyond the examina- nation (RT) within the examination boundary shown
tion volumes as detected by the procedures used to in Figs. IWB-2500-1 through IWB-2500-6 shall not
examine the specified volumes, the overall size of the exceed the limits specified in Table IWB-3510-3.
flaw shall be compared with the standards specified in (b) Where a flaw extends beyond the examination
Table IWB-3510-1. boundaries, or separate linear flaws lie both within and
(c) Any two or more coplanar aligned flaws character- beyond the boundaries but are characterized as a single
ized as separate flaws by IWA-3330 are allowable, flaw by IWA-3400, the overall flaw size shall be
provided the requirements of IWA-3390 are met. compared with the standards of Table IWB-3510-3.
138
IWB-3512 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-3514.1
139
Table IWB-3512-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Table IWB-3512-2
TABLE IWB-3512-1
ALLOWABLE PLANAR FLAWS
Material: Ferritic steels that meet the requirements of NB-2331 and G-2110(b) of Section III
TABLE IWB-3512-2
COMPONENT THICKNESS VS FLAW LOCATION
Component Thickness, t
Location of Flaw Barrel Type Nozzle Flange Type Nozzle Set-On Type Nozzle Integrally Cast Nozzle
[Note (1)] [Fig. IWB-2500-7(a)] [Fig. IWB-2500-7(b)] [Fig. IWB-2500-7(c)] [Fig. IWB-2500-7(d)]
Shell (or head) adjoining region ts ts ts n/a
Attachment weld region ts ts ts n/a
Nozzle cylinder region (tn1 + tn2)/2 (tn1 + tn2)/2 tn1 n/a
Nozzle inside corner region Smallest of tn1, tn2, or ts Smallest of tn1, tn2, or ts Smaller of tn1 or ts Smaller of tn1 or ts
NOTE:
(1) See Figs. IWB-2500-7(a) through (d) for definition of the examination volume for each of the examination regions.
140
IWB-3514.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-3515.3
(1) Surface flaws that do not penetrate through 2500-8 through IWB-2500-11 shall not exceed the limits
the nominal clad thickness into base metal need not specified in Table IWB-3514-4.
be compared with the standards of IWB-3514.1(a). (b) Where a flaw extends beyond the boundaries of
(2) The size of allowable surface flaws that pene- the examination surfaces in Figs. IWB-2500-8 through
trate through the cladding into base metal shall not IWB-2500-11, or where discontinuous linear flaws lie
exceed the standards of IWB-3514.1(a), except that the both within and beyond the boundaries and are character-
depth a of the flaw shall be the total depth minus the ized as a single flaw by the rules of IWA-3400, the
nominal clad thickness. size of allowable overall linear flaws shall not exceed
the limits specified in Table IWB-3514-4.
IWB-3514.2 Allowable Flaw Standards for Ferritic
Piping
(a) The size of allowable flaws shall not exceed the
limits specified in Table IWB-3514-1.
(b) Where flaws on the outer surface of piping as
detected by the surface examination method during an IWB-3515 Standards for Examination Category
inservice examination exceed the allowable standards B-G-1, Pressure Retaining Bolting
of IWB-3514.7, the indications may be examined by Greater Than 2 in. (51 mm) in
the volumetric method. The acceptance of these flaws Diameter
shall be governed by the allowable flaw standards for
the volumetric examination method in Table IWB- IWB-3515.1 Allowable Flaws for Surface Examina-
3514-1. tions of Studs and Bolts. Allowable surface flaws in
vessel closure studs and pressure retaining bolting shall
IWB-3514.3 Allowable Flaw Standards for Austen- not exceed the following limits:
itic Piping (a) nonaxial flaws, 1⁄4 in. in (6 mm) length
(a) The size of allowable flaws shall not exceed the (b) axial flaws, 1 in. (25 mm) in length
limits specified in Table IWB-3514-2.
(b) Where flaws on the outer surface of piping as
detected by the surface examination method during an IWB-3515.2 Allowable Flaws for Volumetric Ex-
inservice examination exceed the allowable standards, aminations of Studs and Bolts
the flaws may be examined by the volumetric method. (a) The size of allowable nonaxial flaws in vessel
The acceptance of these flaws shall be governed by the closure studs and pressure retaining bolting within the
allowable flaw standards for the volumetric examination boundary of the examination volume shown in Fig.
method in Table IWB-3514-2. IWB-2500-12 shall not exceed the limits specified in
Table IWB-3515-1.
IWB-3514.4 Allowable Flaw Standards for Dissim- (b) Any two or more subsurface flaws, at any diame-
ilar Metal Welds ter of the stud which combine to reduce the net diameter
(a) The size of allowable flaws in the carbon or low are acceptable, provided the combined flaw depths do
alloy steel end of a dissimilar metal weld joint shall not exceed the sum of the allowable limits specified
be governed by the standards of IWB-3514.2. in Table IWB-3515-1 for the corresponding flaw aspect
(b) The size of allowable flaws in the high alloy ratios, divided by the number of flaws.
steel or high nickel alloy end, and the weld metal of (c) Any flaw detected by the volumetric examination
a dissimilar metal weld joint shall be governed by the shall be investigated by a surface examination. If con-
standards of IWB-3514.3. firmed to be a surface flaw, the standards of IWB-
3515.1 shall apply. If not a surface flaw, the standards
IWB-3514.6 Allowable Laminar Flaws. The area of IWB-3515.2(a) and (b) shall apply.
of allowable laminar flaws, as defined by IWA-3360,
within the boundary of the examination zones shown
in Figs. IWB-2500-8 through IWB-2500-11, shall not IWB-3515.3 Allowable Flaws for Volumetric Ex-
exceed the limits specified in Table IWB-3514-3. aminations of Threads in Stud Holes. The size of
allowable flaws within the boundary of the examination
IWB-3514.7 Allowable Linear Flaw Standards for volume in Fig. IWB-2500-12 and oriented on a plane
Ferritic Piping normal to the axis of the stud shall not exceed 0.2 in.
(a) The size of an allowable linear flaw within the (5 mm) as measured radially from the root of the
boundaries of the examination surfaces in Figs. IWB- thread.
141
TABLE IWB-3514-1
ALLOWABLE PLANAR FLAWS
Material: Ferritic steels that meet the requirements of NB-2300 and the specified minimum yield strength of 50 ksi or less at 100°F
Preservice Examination
0.00 7.4 9.2Y 6.7 8.4Y 5.7 7.2Y 4.7 5.8Y 3.7 4.6Y
0.05 7.9 9.6Y 7.2 8.7Y 6.2 7.5Y 5.0 6.1Y 4.0 4.8Y
0.10 8.7 10.4Y 7.9 9.5Y 6.8 8.1Y 5.5 6.6Y 4.3 5.2Y
0.15 9.6 11.5Y 8.8 10.5Y 7.5 9.0Y 6.1 7.3Y 4.8 5.8Y
0.20 9.6 11.5Y 9.9 11.8Y 8.4 10.1Y 6.9 8.2Y 5.4 6.5Y
0.25 9.6 11.5Y 9.9 11.8Y 9.5 11.4Y 7.8 9.3Y 6.1 7.3Y
0.30 9.6 11.5Y 9.9 11.8Y 9.5 11.4Y 8.8 10.5Y 6.9 8.2Y
0.35 9.6 11.5Y 9.9 11.8Y 9.5 11.4Y 8.8 11.8Y 6.9 9.3Y
0.40 9.6 11.5Y 9.9 11.8Y 9.5 11.4Y 8.8 11.8Y 6.9 10.4Y
142
0.45 9.6 11.5Y 9.9 11.8Y 9.5 11.4Y 8.8 11.8Y 6.9 11.6Y
0.50 9.6 11.5Y 9.9 11.8Y 9.5 11.4Y 8.8 11.8Y 6.9 11.6Y
Inservice Examination
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
0.00 11.1 13.8Y 10.0 12.6Y 8.5 10.8Y 7.0 8.7Y 5.5 6.9Y
0.05 11.8 14.4Y 10.8 13.0Y 9.3 11.2Y 7.5 9.1Y 6.0 7.2Y
0.10 13.0 15.6Y 11.8 14.2Y 10.2 12.1Y 8.2 9.9Y 6.4 7.8Y
0.15 14.4 17.2Y 13.2 15.7Y 11.2 13.5Y 9.1 10.9Y 7.2 8.7Y
0.20 14.4 17.2Y 14.8 17.7Y 12.6 15.1Y 10.3 12.3Y 8.1 9.7Y
0.25 14.4 17.2Y 14.8 17.7Y 14.2 17.1Y 11.7 13.9Y 9.1 10.9Y
0.30 14.4 17.2Y 14.8 17.7Y 14.2 17.1Y 13.2 15.7Y 10.3 12.3Y
0.35 14.4 17.2Y 14.8 17.7Y 14.2 17.1Y 13.2 17.7Y 10.3 13.9Y
0.40 14.4 17.2Y 14.8 17.7Y 14.2 17.1Y 13.2 17.7Y 10.3 15.6Y
0.45 14.4 17.2Y 14.8 17.7Y 14.2 17.1Y 13.2 17.7Y 10.3 17.4Y
0.50 14.4 17.2Y 14.8 17.7Y 14.2 17.1Y 13.2 17.7Y 10.3 17.4Y
NOTES:
(1) For intermediate flaw aspect ratios a/ ø and thickness t, linear interpolation is permissible. Refer to IWA-3200(b) and (c).
(2) t is nominal wall thickness or actual wall thickness as determined by UT examination.
(3) The total depth of a subsurface flaw in 2a.
(4) Y p(S/t)/(a/t) pS/a. If S < 0.4d, the flaw is classified as a surface flaw. If Y > 1.0, use Y p 1.0.
TABLE IWB-3514-2
ALLOWABLE PLANAR FLAWS
Material: Austenitic steels that meet the requirements for the specified minimum yield strength of 35 ksi or less at 100°F
Surface Subsurface Surface Subsurface Surface Subsurface Surface Subsurface Nom. Wall Flaw
Flaw, Flaw,3,4 Flaw, Flaw,3,4 Flaw, Flaw,3,4 Flaw, Flaw,3,4 Thickness,1,2 Length,
a/t, % a/t, % a/t, % a/t, % a/t, % a/t, % a/t, % a/t, % t, in. ø, in.
Preservice Examination
0.00 9.4 9.4Y 8.5 8.5Y 8.0 8.0Y 7.6 7.6Y 0.312 or less 1⁄
8
0.05 9.6 9.6Y 8.6 8.6Y 8.2 8.2Y 7.7 7.7Y
0.10 9.8 9.8Y 8.8 8.8Y 8.3 8.3Y 7.8 7.8Y 1.0 3⁄
16
0.15 9.9 9.9Y 8.9 8.9Y 8.4 8.4Y 7.9 7.9Y
0.20 10.0 10.0Y 9.1 9.1Y 8.6 8.6Y 8.1 8.1Y 2.0 1⁄
4
0.25 10.0 10.0Y 9.2 9.2Y 8.7 8.7Y 8.2 8.2Y
0.30 10.0 10.0Y 9.4 9.4Y 8.9 8.9Y 8.3 8.3Y 3.0 and over 1⁄
4
0.35 10.0 10.0Y 9.5 9.5Y 9.0 9.0Y 8.5 8.5Y
143
0.40 10.0 10.0Y 9.7 9.7Y 9.1 9.1Y 8.6 8.6Y
0.45 10.0 10.0Y 9.8 9.8Y 9.3 9.3Y 8.7 8.7Y
0.50 10.0 10.0Y 10.0 10.0Y 9.4 9.4Y 8.9 8.9Y
Inservice Examination
0.00 11.7 11.7Y 10.6 10.6Y 10.0 10.0Y 9.5 9.5Y 0.312 or less 0.2
0.05 12.0 12.0Y 10.7 10.7Y 10.2 10.2Y 9.6 9.6Y
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS
0.10 12.2 12.2Y 11.0 11.0Y 10.4 10.4Y 9.7 9.7Y 1.0 0.25
0.15 12.4 12.4Y 11.1 11.1Y 10.5 10.5Y 9.9 9.9Y
0.20 12.5 12.5Y 11.4 11.4Y 10.7 10.7Y 10.1 10.1Y 2.0 0.45
0.25 12.5 12.5Y 11.5 11.5Y 10.9 10.9Y 10.2 10.2Y
0.30 12.5 12.5Y 11.7 11.7Y 11.1 11.1Y 10.4 10.4Y 3.0 and over 0.65
0.35 12.5 12.5Y 11.9 11.9Y 11.2 11.2Y 10.6 10.6Y
0.40 12.5 12.5Y 12.1 12.1Y 11.4 11.4Y 10.7 10.7Y
0.45 12.5 12.5Y 12.2 12.2Y 11.6 11.6Y 10.9 10.9Y
0.50 12.5 12.5Y 12.5 12.5Y 11.7 11.7Y 11.1 11.1Y
NOTES:
(1) For intermediate flaw aspect ratios a/ ø and thickness t, linear interpolation is permissible. Refer to IWA-3200(b) and (c).
(2) t is nominal wall thickness or actual wall thickness as determined by UT examination.
(3) The total depth of a subsurface flaw in 2a.
(4) Y p(S/t)/(a/t) pS/a. If S < 0.4d, the flaw is classified as a surface flaw. If Y > 1.0, use Y p 1.0.
Table IWB-3514-2
IWB-3516 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWB-3518.1
144
IWB-3518.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-3519.1
TABLE IWB-3514-4
ALLOWABLE LINEAR FLAWS
Material: Ferritic steels that meet the requirements of NB-2300 and specified
minimum yield strength of 50 ksi or less at 100°F
(b) Where a flaw extends beyond the boundaries of (2) The size of an allowable surface flaw that
the examination surfaces and volumes, or separate penetrates through the cladding into base material shall
flaws are detected that lie both within and beyond the not exceed the standards of IWB-3518.1(a), except that
boundaries but are characterized as a single flaw by the dimension a of the flaw shall be the total depth
the rules of IWA-3300, the overall flaw shall be com- minus the nominal clad thickness.
pared with the standards of IWB-3518.1(a).
(c) Any two or more coplanar aligned flaws character-
ized as separate flaws by IWA-3300 are allowable, IWB-3519 Standards for Examination Category
provided the requirements of IWA-3390 are met. B-L-2, Pump Casings, and
(d) Where a flaw is detected by the radiographic Examination Category B-M-2, Valve
examination method and exceeds the allowable surface Bodies
flaw standards of Table IWB-3518-1 or Table IWB-
IWB-3519.1 Visual Examination, VT-3. The follow-
3518-2 (as applicable), a supplemental examination by
ing relevant conditions4 shall require correction to meet
a surface examination method may be performed, with
the requirements of IWB-3122 prior to service or IWB-
acceptance in accordance with Table IWB-3518-1 or
3142 prior to continued service:
Table IWB-3518-2. If acceptable by surface examina-
(a) corrosion or erosion that reduces the pressure
tion, the flaw shall then be compared with the allowable
retaining wall thickness5 by more than 10%;
subsurface flaw standards of Table IWB-3518-1 or
Table IWB-3518-2.
(e) A surface flaw in cladding detected by volumetric 4 Relevant conditions are defined in IWA-9000; they do not include
examination of austenitic clad ferritic base material fabrication marks, material roughness, casting irregularities, and other
conditions acceptable by material, design, and manufacturing specifi-
shall be governed by the following standards. cations of the component.
(1) Surface flaws that do not penetrate through the 5 Wall thickness is determined either from design information, con-
nominal clad thickness into base material are allowable. struction drawings, or by measurement on the component.
145
IWB-3519.1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWB-3522.1
146
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Table IWB-3518-1
TABLE IWB-3518-1
ALLOWABLE PLANAR FLAWS
Material: Ferritic steels that meet the requirements of NB-2300 and the
specified minimum yield strength of 50 ksi or less at 100°F
Thickness Range: 2 in. or greater
Volumetric
Volumetric (UT) Volumetric (RT) (RT)
and Surface Method
Aspect Surface Subsurface Nominal Wall Subsurface
Ratio,1 Flaw,2 Flaw,2–4 Thickness,1 Surface Flaw, Flaw,
a/ ø a/t, % a/t, % t, in. Length, ø, in. Length, ø, in.
147
IWB-3522.1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWB-3523.1
TABLE IWB-3518-2
ALLOWABLE PLANAR FLAWS
Material: Austenitic stainless steels that meet the requirements for the specified
minimum yield strength of 35 ksi or less at 100°F
Thickness Range: 2 in. and greater
Volumetric
(RT) and
Surface
Volumetric (UT)2,3 Method Volumetric (RT)
Preservice Examination
Inservice Examination
(3) The allowable flaws for inservice examinations are based on the following equations:
(4) Y p (S / t ) / (a / t ) p S / a. If S < 0.4d, the flaw is classified as a surface flaw. If Y> 1.0, use Y p 1.0
(5) The total depth of a subsurface flaw is 2a.
the conduct of system pressure tests shall require correc- (e) discoloration or accumulated residues on surfaces
tion to meet the requirements of IWB-3142 and IWA- of components, insulation, or floor areas that may be
5250 prior to continued service: evidence of borated water leakage9 [IWA-5242(c)]; or
(a) leakage from noninsulated components (IWA- (f) leakages or flow test results from buried compo-
5241); nents (IWA-5244) in excess of limits established by
(b) leakage in excess of permissible levels defined the Owner.
by the Owner from components provided with leakage
limiting devices (IWA-5243);
(c) leakage9 from insulated components or inaccessi- IWB-3523 Standards for Examination Category
ble components that will require location of leakage B-O, Pressure Retaining Welds in
source (IWA-5242); Control Rod Drive Housings
(d) areas of general corrosion of a component re-
sulting from leakage [IWA-5250(b)]; IWB-3523.1 Allowable Planar Flaws
(a) The size of an allowable planar flaw within the
9 The leakage is the through-wall leakage that penetrates the pressure boundary of the examination surfaces and volumes
retaining membrane. delineated in Fig. IWB-2500-18 shall not exceed the
148
IWB-3523.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-3611
limits specified in IWB-3523.2 and IWB-3523.3, as (3) Category 3 — A subsurface flaw that lies in
applicable. both the ferritic steel and the cladding shall be treated
(b) Where a flaw extends beyond the boundaries of as either a surface or a subsurface flaw depending on
the examination surfaces and volumes, or separate the relationship between S and d as shown in Fig.
flaws are detected that lie both within and beyond the IWB-3610-1.
boundaries but are characterized as a single flaw by (4) Category 4 — A subsurface flaw that lies
the rules of IWA-3300, the overall flaw size shall be entirely in the ferritic steel and terminates at the weld
compared with the standards of IWB-3523.1(a). metal interface shall be treated as either a surface or
(c) Any two or more coplanar aligned flaws character- subsurface flaw depending on the relationship between
ized as separate flaws by IWA-3300 are allowable, S and d as shown in Fig. IWB-3610-1.
provided the requirements of IWA-3390 are met. (5) Category 5 — A subsurface flaw contained
entirely in the ferritic steel shall be treated as either
IWB-3523.2 Allowable Flaw Standards for Surface a surface or a subsurface flaw depending on the relation-
Examination ship between S and d as shown in Fig. IWB-3610-1.
(a) The size of allowable flaws shall not exceed 3⁄16 (c) When examination results do not permit accurate
in. (4.8 mm) for the preservice examination and 1⁄4 in. determination of the flaw category, the more conserva-
(6 mm) for the inservice examination. tive category shall be selected.
(b) Where a flaw on the outer surface of the housing (d) The component containing the flaw is acceptable
exceeds the allowable standards, the housing may be for continued service during the evaluated time period
examined using the volumetric method, and the accept- if the following are satisfied:
ance standards of IWB-3523.3 shall apply. (1) the criteria of IWB-3611 or IWB-3612;
(2) the primary stress limits of NB-3000, assuming
IWB-3523.3 Allowable Flaw Standards for Volu- a local area reduction of the pressure retaining mem-
metric Examination brane that is equal to the area of the detected flaw(s)
(a) The depth of an allowable preservice flaw shall as determined by the flaw characterization rules of
not exceed 10% of weld thickness; the length shall IWA-3000.
not exceed 60% of weld thickness. (e) The evaluation procedures shall be the responsi-
(b) The depth of an allowable inservice flaw shall bility of the Owner and shall be subject to approval
not exceed 12.5% of weld thickness; the length shall by the regulatory authority having jurisdiction at the
not exceed 75% of weld thickness. plant site.
149
Fig. IWB-3610-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
150
IWB-3612 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-3640
IWB-3612 Acceptance Criteria Based on Applied (b) For normal conditions (including upset and test
Stress Intensity Factor conditions) excluding those described in IWB-3613(a):
A flaw exceeding the limits of IWB-3500 is accept-
KI < KIa / √ 10
able if the applied stress intensity factor and the flaw
size af satisfy the following criteria.
(a) For normal conditions: where
KIp the maximum stress intensity factor for normal
KI < KIa / √ 10 conditions for the flaw size af
KIap the available fracture toughness based on crack
arrest for the corresponding crack tip temper-
where
ature
KIp the maximum applied stress intensity factor for
(c) For emergency and faulted conditions:
normal (including upset and test) conditions for
the flaw size af (defined in IWB-3611)
KI < KIc / √ 2
KIap the available fracture toughness based on crack
arrest for the corresponding crack tip temper-
ature where
(b) For emergency and faulted conditions: KIp the maximum applied stress intensity factor for
the flaw size af under emergency and faulted
KI < KIc / √ 2 conditions
KIcp the available fracture toughness based on frac-
ture initiation for the corresponding crack tip
where temperature
KIp the maximum applied stress intensity factor for
the flaw size af under emergency and faulted
conditions
KIcp the available fracture toughness based on frac- IWB-3620 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR
ture initiation for the corresponding crack tip FERRITIC COMPONENTS LESS
temperature THAN 4 in. IN THICKNESS
These criteria are in the course of preparation. In
the interim, the criteria of IWB-3610 may be applied.
IWB-3613 Acceptance Criteria for Flanges and
Shell Regions Near Structural
Discontinuities
IWB-3630 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR
The following criteria shall be used for the evaluation STEAM GENERATOR TUBING
of flaws in areas such as vessel-flange and tophead-
flange intersections (NB-3213.2 and NB-3213.3) where Evaluation of cracks, wastage, or intergranular corro-
the bolt-up loads play a significant role. A flaw ex- sion in steam generator tubes that exceed the allowable
ceeding the limits of IWB-3500 is acceptable if the flaw standards of IWB-3521 shall be performed by
applied stress intensity factor satisfies the following analyses acceptable to the regulatory authority having
limits. jurisdiction at the plant site.
(a) For conditions of bolt-up and pressurization not
exceeding 20% of the Design Pressure, during which
the minimum temperature is not less than RTNDT + 60°F: IWB-3640 EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR
KI < KIa / √ 2 AUSTENITIC PIPING
Piping containing a flaw exceeding the allowable
where flaw standards of IWB-3514.3 may be evaluated to
KIp the maximum stress intensity factor correspond- determine its acceptability for continued service in
ing to the final size af (defined in IWB-3611) accordance with the evaluation procedures and accept-
KIap the available fracture toughness based on crack ance criteria of IWB-3641 or IWB-3642. The evaluation
arrest for the corresponding crack tip temper- procedures and acceptance criteria shall be the responsi-
ature bility of the Owner and shall be subject to approval
151
IWB-3640 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWB-3642
of the regulatory authority having jurisdiction at the ing to flaw length øf for normal operating (in-
plant site. cluding upset and test) conditions
aop the maximum allowable flaw depth correspond-
ing to the flaw length øf for postulated emer-
gency and faulted conditions
IWB-3641 Evaluation Procedures Based on Flaw
(b) The time interval selected for flaw growth analysis
Size
(i.e., evaluation period) shall be either until the next
Evaluation procedures based on flaw size may be inspection or until the end of service lifetime of the item.
used subject to the following: (c) Using the applied stress values, such as those
(a) The evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria referenced by Appendix C, and the øf flaw parameter
are applicable to austenitic pipe NPS 4 (DN100) or defined in IWB-3641.2(a), the maximum allowable flaw
greater and portions of adjoining pipe fittings within depth, an, of a circumferential flaw under normal op-
a distance of √ rt of the weld center line (where r is erating conditions shall be calculated from Table IWB-
the nominal outside radius and t is the nominal thickness 3641-1 for flaws in base material and associated welds.
of the pipe). Similarly, the maximum allowable flaw depth, ao, of
(b) The evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria a circumferential flaw under emergency and faulted
are applicable to pipe and pipe fittings (and associated conditions shall be calculated from Table IWB-3641-
weld materials) which: 2 for flaws in base material and associated welds. The
(1) are made of wrought stainless steel, Ni–Cr– weld-base metal interface is defined in Fig. IWB-3641-
Fe alloy, or cast stainless steel (with ferrite level less 1. Alternatively, the equations given in C-3300 and C-
than 20% or 20FN); 3400 may be used in lieu of Tables IWB-3641-1 through
(2) have a specified minimum yield strength less IWB-3641-4.
than 45 ksi (310 MPa); and (d) Using the stress ratio and øf flaw parameter, the
(3) have Sm values given in Table I-1.2 of Sec- maximum allowable flaw depth of an axial flaw under
tion III. normal conditions an shall be calculated from Table
(c) For cast stainless steel materials, adequate tough- IWB-3641-3. Similarly, the maximum allowable flaw
ness for the pipe to reach limit load after aging shall depth of an axial flaw under emergency and faulted
be demonstrated. conditions ao shall be calculated from Table IWB-
3641-4.
IWB-3641.1 Methodology
(a) A flaw growth analysis shall be performed on IWB-3641.3 Acceptance Criteria. Piping containing
the detected flaw to determine its maximum growth a flaw exceeding the allowable flaw standards of IWB-
due to fatigue and stress corrosion cracking mechanisms, 3514.3 is acceptable for continued service until the end
or both, where applicable, during a specified evaluation of the evaluation period if the following criteria are
period. satisfied:
(b) The calculated maximum flaw dimensions at the (a) For circumferential flaws
end of the evaluation period shall be compared with (1) af < an (Table IWB-3641-1) and
the calculated maximum allowable flaw dimensions for (2) af < ao (Table IWB-3641-2)
both normal operating conditions and emergency and (b) For axial flaws
faulted conditions to determine the acceptability of the (1) af < an (Table IWB-3641-3) and
item for continued service. (2) af < ao (Table IWB-3641-4)
IWB-3641.2 Evaluation
(a) The flaw shall be evaluated by analytical proce-
IWB-3642 Evaluation Procedure Based on
dures such as those described in Appendix C to calculate
Applied Stress
the following critical flaw parameters:
af p the maximum depth to which the detected flaw The piping containing a flaw exceeding the allowable
is calculated to grow at the end of the evaluation flaw standards of IWB-3514.3 is acceptable for contin-
period ued service until the end of the evaluation period if
øf p the maximum length to which the detected flaw the evaluation procedures provide a safety margin, based
is calculated to grow at the end of the evaluation on load, equivalent to a factor of 3 for normal operating
period (including upset and test) conditions and a factor of
anp the maximum allowable flaw depth correspond- 1.5 for emergency and faulted conditions.
152
Table IWB-3641-1 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS Fig. IWB-3641-1
TABLE IWB-3641-1
ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION PERIOD FLAW
DEPTH1 TO THICKNESS RATIO
FOR CIRCUMFERENTIAL FLAWS — NORMAL OPERATING (INCLUDING UPSET AND TEST) CONDITIONS
3 4
P + Pb Z P
(5) Stress Ratio p m for base metal and GMAW and GTAW welds; and Pm + Pb + e for SAW and SMAW welds
Sm Sm 2.77
153
IWB-3650 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWB-3652
TABLE IWB-3641-2
ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION PERIOD FLAW
DEPTH1 TO THICKNESS RATIO
FOR CIRCUMFERENTIAL FLAWS —
EMERGENCY AND FAULTED CONDITIONS
3 4
P + Pb Z P
(5) Stress Ratio p m for base metal and GMAW and GTAW welds; and Pm + Pb + e for SAW and SMAW welds
Sm Sm 2.77
IWB-3650 EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND (a) The evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR are applicable to ferritic piping NPS 4 or greater and
FLAWS IN FERRITIC PIPING portions of adjoining pipe fittings within a distance
Ferritic piping containing a flaw exceeding the accept- of √ R2 t from the weld center line, where R2 is the
ance standards of IWB-3514.2 may be evaluated by outside radius and t is the thickness of the pipe.
analytical procedures to determine acceptability for (b) The evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria
continued service to the next inspection or to the end are applicable to seamless or welded wrought carbon
of service lifetime. The pipe containing the flaw is steel piping and pipe fittings that have a specified
acceptable for continued service during the evaluated minimum yield strength not greater than 40 ksi, and
time period if the criteria of IWB-3652(a) or (b) are their associated weld materials.
satisfied. The evaluation shall be the responsibility of
the Owner and shall be subject to the approval of the
regulatory authority having jurisdiction at the plant site. IWB-3652 Acceptance Criteria
The evaluation shall be submitted to the enforcement
authorities having jurisdiction at the plant site. A ferritic pipe containing a flaw exceeding the accept-
ance standards of IWB-3514.2 may be evaluated by
analytical procedures such as those described in Appen-
IWB-3651 Evaluation Procedures
dix H and are acceptable for continued service during the
Evaluation procedures based on flaw size or applied evaluated time period when the critical flaw parameters
stress such as those defined in Appendix H may be satisfy the criteria in IWB-3652(a) or (b).
used, subject to the following. (a) Flaw Size Criteria
154
IWB-3652 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-3652
TABLE IWB-3641-3
ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION
PERIOD FLAW DEPTH1 TO THICKNESS RATIO FOR AXIAL FLAWS —
NORMAL OPERATING (INCLUDING UPSET AND TEST) CONDITIONS
where
or
af p the maximum depth to which the detected flaw
is calculated to grow by the end of the evaluation
sh ≤ Sa for axial flaws
period
øf p the maximum length to which the detected flaw
is calculated to grow by the end of the evaluation where
period Pbp the maximum applied pipe primary bending
anp the maximum allowable flaw depth correspond- stress
ing to the flaw length ø f for normal operating shp the maximum applied pipe hoop stress
(including upset and test) conditions Scp the allowable pipe bending stress for a pipe with
aop the maximum allowable flaw depth correspond- a circumferential flaw
ing to the flaw length øf for postulated emer- Sap the allowable pipe hoop stress for a pipe with
gency and faulted conditions an axial flaw
Tables of allowable flaw depths are given in Appendix Equations for these values are given in Appendix H.
H. The allowable flaw depths for the flawed pipe, an The allowable stress for the flawed pipe, Sc or Sa , is
and ao , are functions of the actual pipe stresses, the a function of the actual pipe stresses, the required
required safety margins, the pipe material properties, safety margins, the pipe material properties, the end-
155
IWB-3652 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWB-3730
TABLE IWB-3641-4
ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION
PERIOD FLAW DEPTH1 TO THICKNESS RATIO FOR
AXIAL FLAWS — EMERGENCY AND FAULTED CONDITIONS
of-evaluation-period flaw length and depth, flaw orienta- (b) Appendix E provides procedures and criteria that
tion, and the pipe failure mode. may be used to evaluate the integrity of the reactor
vessel beltline for the out-of-limit condition.
(c) The evaluation procedures shall be the responsi-
bility of the Owner and shall be subject to acceptance
IWB-3700 ANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF
by the regulatory authority having jurisdiction at the
PLANT OPERATING EVENTS plant site.
IWB-3710 SCOPE
This Subarticle provides rules for evaluation of events
IWB-3730 FRACTURE TOUGHNESS
and conditions for pressure boundary components and
CRITERIA FOR PROTECTION
associated structures in operating plants.
AGAINST FAILURE
(a) During reactor operation, load and temperature
conditions shall be maintained to provide protection
IWB-3720 UNANTICIPATED OPERATING
against failure due to the presence of postulated flaws
EVENTS
in the ferritic portions of the reactor coolant pressure
(a) When an operating event causes an excursion boundary. Appendix G provides procedures that may
outside the normal operating pressure and temperature be used to define these load and temperature conditions.
limits defined in the plant Technical Specifications, an (b) For reactor vessels with material upper shelf
engineering evaluation shall be performed to determine Charpy impact energy levels less than 50 ft-lb, service
the effects of the out-of-limit condition on the structural and test conditions may be evaluated, using current
integrity of the Reactor Coolant System. geometry and material properties, to provide protection
156
IWB-3730 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-3740
157
ARTICLE IWB-5000
SYSTEM PRESSURE TESTS
158
IWB-5240 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1 COMPONENTS IWB-5240
159
SUBSECTION IWC
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2
COMPONENTS OF LIGHT-WATER
COOLED PLANTS
161
IWC-3125 Review by Authorities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
IWC-3130 Inservice Visual Examinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
IWC-3131 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
IWC-3132 Acceptance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
IWC-3132.1 Acceptance by Supplemental Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
IWC-3132.2 Acceptance by Corrective Measures or Repair /Replacement Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
IWC-3132.3 Acceptance by Analytical Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
IWC-3133 Repair /Replacement Activity and Reexamination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194
IWC-3134 Review by Authorities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3200 Supplemental Examinations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3400 Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3410 Acceptance Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3410.1 Applications of Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3420 Characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3430 Acceptability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3500 Acceptance Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3510 Standards for Examination Category C-A, Pressure Retaining Welds in
Pressure Vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3510.1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3510.2 Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3510.3 Conditionally Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3510.4 Allowable Linear Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
IWC-3511 Standards for Examination Category C-B, Pressure Retaining Welds of
Nozzles in Vessels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
IWC-3511.1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
IWC-3511.2 Allowable Linear Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
IWC-3511.3 Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
IWC-3512 Standards for Examination Category C-C, Welded Attachments for
Vessels, Piping, Pumps, and Valves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
IWC-3512.1 Allowable Linear Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
IWC-3513 Standards for Examination Category C-D, Pressure Retaining Bolting
Greater Than 2 in. in Diameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
IWC-3513.1 Allowable Flaws for Volumetric Examinations of Studs and Bolts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
IWC-3513.2 Allowable Flaws for Surface Examinations of Studs and Bolts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
IWC-3514 Standards for Examination Category C-F-1, Pressure Retaining Welds in
Austenitic Stainless Steel or High Alloy Piping, and C-F-2, Pressure
Retaining Welds in Carbon or Low Alloy Steel Piping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
IWC-3515 Standards for Examination Category C-G, Pressure Retaining Welds in
Pumps and Valves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
IWC-3516 Standards for Examination Category C-H, All Pressure Retaining
Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
IWC-3600 Analytical Evaluation of Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
IWC-3610 Acceptance Criteria for Ferritic Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
162
Figures
IWC-2500-1 Vessel Circumferential Welds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
IWC-2500-2 Typical Tubesheet-to-Shell Circumferential Welds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
IWC-2500-3 Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
IWC-2500-4 Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
IWC-2500-5 Welded Attachments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
IWC-2500-6 Pressure Retaining Bolting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
IWC-2500-7 Welds in Piping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
IWC-2500-8 Welds in Pump Casings and Valve Bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
IWC-2500-9 Branch Connection Welds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
IWC-2500-10 Pipe Branch Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
IWC-2500-11 Pipe Branch Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
IWC-2500-12 Pipe Branch Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
IWC-2500-13 Pipe Branch Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
Tables
IWC-2411-1 Inspection Program A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
IWC-2412-1 Inspection Program B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
IWC-2500-1 Examination Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
IWC-3410-1 Acceptance Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
IWC-3510-1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
IWC-3510-2 Allowable Laminar Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
IWC-3510-3 Allowable Linear Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
IWC-3511-1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
IWC-3511-2 Allowable Linear Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198
IWC-3513-1 Allowable Planar Flaws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199
163
ARTICLE IWC-1000
SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITY
165
166
167
IWC-2500 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWC-2500
168
ASME B&PVC
TABLE IWC-2500-1
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
Examination
Item Requirements / Examination Acceptance Frequency of
No. Parts Examined Fig. No. Method5 Standard Extent of Examination Examination4
C1.10 Shell Circumferential Welds IWC-2500-1 Volumetric IWC-3510 Welds1 at gross structural Each inspection
discontinuity2 only interval
C1.20 Head Circumferential Welds IWC-2500-1 Volumetric IWC-3510 Head-to-shell weld1 Each inspection
interval
C1.30 Tubesheet-to-Shell Weld IWC-2500-2 Volumetric IWC-3510 Tubesheet-to-shell weld1 Each inspection
interval
169
NOTES:
(1) Includes essentially 100% of the weld length.
(2) Gross structural discontinuity is defined in NB-3213.2. Examples are junctions between shells of different thicknesses, cylindrical shell-to-conical shell junctions,
shell (or head)-to-flange welds, and head-to-shell welds.
(3) In the case of multiple vessels of similar design, size, and service (such as steam generators, heat exchangers), the required examinations may be limited to one
vessel or distributed among the vessels.
(4) The vessel areas selected for the initial examination shall be reexamined in the same sequence over the service lifetime of the component, to the extent practical.
(5) For welds in vessels with nominal wall thickness of 0.2 in. or less, a surface examination may be applied in lieu of a volumetric examination. The examination
shall include the weld and 0.5 in. on either side of the weld. The acceptance standard for the examination shall be those specified for piping in IWC-3514.
Table IWC-2500-1
Examination
Item Requirements / Examination Acceptance Frequency of
No. Parts Examined Fig. No. Method Standard Extent of Examination4 Examination3
C2.10 Nozzles in Vessels ≤ 1⁄2 in. Nominal
Thickness
C2.11 Nozzle-to-Shell (Nozzle to Head or IWC-2500-3 Surface IWC-3511 All nozzles at terminal ends1 of Each inspection
Nozzle to Nozzle) Weld piping runs2 interval
170
C2.31 Reinforcing Plate Welds to IWC-2500-4(c) Surface IWC-3511 All nozzles at terminal ends1 of Each inspection
Nozzle and Vessel piping runs2 interval
C2.32 Nozzle-to-Shell (Nozzle to Head or IWC-2500-4(c) Volumetric IWC-3511 All nozzles at terminal ends1 of Each inspection
Nozzle to Nozzle) Welds piping runs2 interval
NOTES:
(1) Includes nozzles welded to or integrally cast in vessels that connect to piping runs (manways and handholes are excluded).
(2) Includes only those piping runs selected for examination under Examination Category C-F.
(3) The nozzles selected initially for examination shall be reexamined in the same sequence over the service lifetime of the component, to the extent practical.
(4) In the case of multiple vessels of similar design, size, and service (such as steam generators, heat exchangers), the required examinations be limited to one vessel
or distributed among the vessels.
(5) The telltale hole in referencing plate shall be examined for evidence of leakage while vessel is undergoing the system leakage test (IWC-5220) as required by
Examination Category C-H.
EXAMINATION CATEGORY C-C, WELDED ATTACHMENTS FOR VESSELS, PIPING, PUMPS, AND VALVES
Examination
Item Requirements / Examination Acceptance Frequency of
No. Parts Examined1 Fig. No. Method Standard Extent of Examination2,3 Examination6
Pressure Vessels
C3.10 Welded Attachments IWC-2500-5 Surface IWC-3512 100% of required areas of each Each identified
welded attachment occurrence
and each in-
spection in-
terval4
Piping
C3.20 Welded Attachments IWC-2500-5 Surface IWC-3512 100% of required areas of each Each identified
welded attachment occurrence
and each in-
spection in-
terval5
Pumps
C3.30 Welded Attachments IWC-2500-5 Surface IWC-3512 100% of required areas of each Each identified
welded attachment occurrence
171
and each in-
spection in-
terval5
Valves
C3.40 Welded Attachments IWC-2500-5 Surface IWC-3512 100% of required areas of each Each identified
welded attachment occurrence
and each in-
spection in-
terval5
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS
NOTES:
(1) Examination is limited to those welded attachments that meet the following conditions:
(a) the attachment is on the outside surface of the pressure retaining component;
(b) the attachment provides component support as defined in NF-1110;
(c) the attachment weld joins the attachment either directly to the surface of the component or to an integrally cast or forged attachment to the component; and
(d) the attachment weld is full penetration, fillet, or partial penetration, continuous, or intermittent.
(2) The extent of the examination includes essentially 100% of the length of the attachment weld at each attachment subject to examination.
(3) Selected samples of welded attachments shall be examined each inspection interval.
(4) For multiple vessels of similar design, function, and service, only one welded attachment of only one of the multiple vessels shall be selected for examination.
(5) For piping, pumps, and valves, a sample of 10% of the welded attachments associated with the component supports selected for examination uner IWF-2510 shall
be examined.
(6) Examination is required whenever component support member deformation, e.g., broken, bent, or pulled out parts, is identified during operation, refueling,
maintenance, examination, or testing.
Table IWC-2500-1
TABLE IWC-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY C-D, PRESSURE RETAINING BOLTING GREATER THAN 2 in. IN DIAMETER
Examination
Table IWC-2500-1
Pressure Vessels
C4.10 Bolts and Studs IWC-2500-6 Volumetric IWC-3513 100% bolts and studs at each Each inspection
bolted connection of com- interval
ponents required to be
inspected
Piping
C4.20 Bolts and Studs IWC-2500-6 Volumetric IWC-3513 100% bolts and studs at each Each inspection
bolted connection of com- interval
ponents required to be
inspected
Pumps
172
C4.30 Bolts and Studs IWC-2500-6 Volumetric IWC-3513 100% bolts and studs at each Each inspection
bolted connection of com- interval
ponents required to be
inspected
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
Valves
C4.40 Bolts and Studs IWC-2500-6 Volumetric IWC-3513 100% bolts and studs at each Each inspection
bolted connection of com- interval
ponents required to be
inspected
NOTES:
(1) The examination may be performed on bolting in place under load or upon disassembly of the connection.
(2) The examination of bolting for vessels, pumps, and valves may be ocnducted on one vessel, one pump, one valve among a group of vessels, pumps, and valves in
each system required to be examined and which are similar in design, size, function, and service. In addition, where the one component to be examined contains
a group of bolted connections of similar design and size (such as flange connections, manway covers), the examination may be conducted on one bolted connection
among the group.
(3) The examination of flange bolting in piping systems required to be examined may be limited to the flange connections in pipe runs selected for examination under
Examination Category C-F.
(4) The areas selected for the initial examination shall be reexamined in the same sequence over the service lifetime of the component, to the extent practical.
ASME B&PVC
TABLE IWC-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY C-F-1, PRESSURE RETAINING WELDS IN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL OR HIGH ALLOY PIPING
Examination
Item Requirements / Examination Acceptance Frequency of
No. Parts Examined1 Fig. No. Method Standard Extent of Examination2 Examination4
C5.30 Socket Welds IWC-2500-7 Surface IWC-3514 100% of each weld requiring Each inspection
examination interval
173
≥ NPS 2
C5.41 Circumferential Weld IWC-2500-9 to -13, Surface IWC-3514 100% of each weld requiring Each inspection
NOTES:
See Notes at end of Examination Category C-F-1.
Table IWC-2500-1
EXAMINATION CATEGORY C-F-1, PRESSURE RETAINING WELDS IN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL OR HIGH ALLOY PIPING
NOTES:
(1) Requirements for examination of welds in piping ≤ NPS 4 apply to PWR high pressure safety injection and auxiliary feedwater systems in accordance with the
exemption criteria of IWC-1220.
(2) The welds selected for examination shall include 7.5%, but not less than 28 welds, of all dissimilar metal, austenitic stainless steel or high alloy welds not exempted
by IWC-1220. (Some welds not exempted by IWC-1220 are not required to be nondestructively examined per Examination Category C-F-1. These welds, however,
shall be included in the total weld count to which the 7.5% sampling rate is applied.) The examinations shall be distributed as follows:
(a) the examinations shall be distributed among the Class 2 systems prorated, to the degree practicable, on the number of nonexempt dissimilar metal, austenitic
stainless steel, or high alloy welds in each system (i.e., if a system contains 30% of the nonexempt welds, then 30% of the nondestructive examinations
required by Examination Category C-F-1 should be performed on that system);
(b) within a system, the examinations shall be distributed among terminal ends, dissimilar metal welds, and structural discontinuities [See Note (3)] prorated, to
the degree practicable, on the number of nonexempt terminal ends, dissimilar metal welds, and structural discontinuities in that system; and
(c) within each system, examinations shall be distributed between line sizes prorated to the degree practicable.
174
(3) Structural discontinuities include pipe weld joints to vessel nozzles, valve bodies, pump casings, pipe fittings (such as elbows, tees, reducers, flanges, etc., conforming
to ANSI B16.9), and pipe branch connections and fittings.
(4) The welds selected for examination shall be reexamined in the same sequence, during subsequent inspection intervals over the service lifetime of the piping component,
to the extent practical.
within the examination boundaries of intersecting circumferential welds. The following requirements shall also be met:
(a) When longitudinal welds are specified and locations are known, examination requirements shall be met for both transverse and parallel flaws at the intersection
of the welds and for that length of longitudinal weld within the circumferential weld examination volume.
(b) When longitudinal welds are specified but locations are unknown, or the existence of longitudinal welds is uncertain, the examination requirements shall be
met for both transverse and parallel flaws within the entire examination volume of intersecting circumferential welds.
EXAMINATION CATEGORY C-F-2, PRESSURE RETAINING WELDS IN CARBON OR LOW ALLOY STEEL PIPING
Examination
Item Requirements / Examination Acceptance Frequency of
No. Parts Examined1 Fig. No. Method Standard Extent of Examination2,5 Examination4
C5.50 Piping Welds ≥ 3⁄8 in. Nominal Wall
Thickness for Piping > NPS 4
C5.51 Circumferential Weld IWC-2500-7 Surface and volumetric IWC-3514 100% of each weld requiring Each inspection
examination6,7 interval
C5.70 Socket Welds IWC-2500-7 Surface IWC-3514 100% of each weld requiring Each inspection
examination interval
175
≥ NPS 2
C5.81 Circumferential Weld IWC-2500-9 to -13, Surface IWC-3514 100% of each weld requiring Each inspection
inclusive examination6 interval
NOTES:
See Notes at end of Examination Category C-F-2.
Table IWC-2500-1
EXAMINATION CATEGORY C-F-2, PRESSURE RETAINING WELDS IN CARBON OR LOW ALLOY STEEL PIPING (CONT’D)
NOTES:
(1) Requirements for examination of welds in piping ≤ NPS 4 apply to PWR high pressure safety injection and auxiliary feedwater systems in accordance with the
exemption criteria of IWC-1220.
(2) The welds selected for examination shall include 7.5%, but not less than 28 welds, of all carbon and low alloy steel welds not exempted by IWC-1220. (Some
welds not exempted by IWC-1220 are not required to be nondestructively examined per Examination Category C-F-2. These welds, however, shall be included in
the total weld count to which the 7.5% sampling rate is applied.) The examinations shall be distributed as follows:
(a) the examinations shall be distributed among the Class 2 systems prorated, to the degree practicable, on the number of nonexempt carbon and low alloy steel
welds in each system (i.e., if a system contains 30% of the nonexempt welds, then 30% of the nondestructive examinations required by Examination Category
C-F-2 should be performed on that system);
(b) within a system, the examinations shall be distributed among terminal ends and structural discontinuities [see Note (3)] prorated, to the degree practicable,
on the number of nonexempt terminal ends and structural discontinuities in that system; and
(c) within each system, examinations shall be distributed between line sizes prorated to the degree practicable.
(3) Structural discontinuities include pipe weld joints to vessel nozzles, valve bodies, pump casings, pipe fittings (such as elbows, tees, reducers, flanges, etc., conforming
176
to ANSI B16.9), and pipe branch connections and fittings.
(4) The welds selected for examination shall be reexamined in the same sequence, during subsequent inspection intervals over the service lifetime of the piping component,
to the extent practical.
(5) Only those welds showing reportable preservice transverse indications need to be examined by the ultrasonic method for reflectors transverse to the weld length
(7) For circumferential welds with intersecting longitudinal welds, volumetric examination of the longitudinal piping welds is required for those portions of the welds
within the examination boundaries of intersecting circumferential welds. The following requirements shall also be met:
(a) When longitudinal welds are specified and locations are known, examination requirements shall be met for both transverse and parallel flaws at the intersection
of the welds and for that length of longitudinal weld within the circumferential weld examination volume.
(b) When longitudinal welds are specified but locations are unknown, or the existence of longitudinal welds is uncertain, the examination requirements shall be
met for both transverse and parallel flaws within the entire examination volume of intersecting circumferential welds.
Examination
Item Requirements / Examination Acceptance Frequency of
No. Parts Examined Fig. No. Method Standard Extent of Examination Examination3
Pumps
C6.10 Pump Casing Welds2 IWC-2500-8 Surface IWC-3515 100% welds in all components1 Each inspection
in each piping run examined interval
under Examination
Category C-F
Valves
C6.20 Valve Body Welds2 IWC-2500-8 Surface IWC-3515 100% welds in all components1 Each inspection
in each piping run examined interval
under Examination
Category C-F
177
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS
NOTES:
(1) In case of multiple pumps and valves of similar design, size, function, and service in a system, the examination of only one pump and one valve among each group
of multiple pumps and valves is required.
(2) The examination may be performed from either the inside or outside surface of the component.
(3) The pumps and valves initially selected for examination shall be reexamined in the same sequence over the service lifetime of the component, to the extent practical.
Table IWC-2500-1
Table IWC-2500-1
178
NOTES:
(1) Visual examination of IWA-5240.
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS Fig. IWC-2500-1
179
Fig. IWC-2500-2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
180
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS Fig. IWC-2500-3
181
Fig. IWC-2500-4 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
182
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS Fig. IWC-2500-4
183
Fig. IWC-2500-5 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
184
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS Fig. IWC-2500-6
185
Fig. IWC-2500-7 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
186
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS Fig. IWC-2500-8
187
Fig. IWC-2500-9 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
188
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS Fig. IWC-2500-10
189
Fig. IWC-2500-11 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
190
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS Fig. IWC-2500-12
191
Fig. IWC-2500-13 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
192
ARTICLE IWC-3000
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
193
IWC-3122.1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWC-3133
changes in flaws from prior examinations shall be 2200 shall be evaluated by comparing the examination
recorded in accordance with IWA-1400(h) and IWA- results with the acceptance standards specified in Table
6230. A component that does not meet the acceptance IWC-3410-1. Acceptance of components for continued
standards of IWC-3410 shall be corrected in accordance service shall be in accordance with IWC-3132, IWC-
with the provisions shown in IWC-3122.2 or IWC- 3133, and IWC-3134.
3122.3.
IWC-3122.2 Acceptance by Repair /Replacement
Activity. A component whose examination detects flaws
that exceed the acceptance standards of Table IWC-
3410-1 is unacceptable for continued service until the IWC-3132 Acceptance
additional examination requirements of IWC-2430 are (a) A component whose examination confirms the
satisfied and the component is corrected by a repair / absence of relevant conditions described in the standards
replacement activity to the extent necessary to meet of Table IWC-3410-1 shall be acceptable for continued
the acceptance standards of IWC-3000. service.
IWC-3122.3 Acceptance by Analytical Evaluation. (b) A component whose examination detects relevant
A component whose examination detects flaws that conditions described in the standards of Table IWC-
exceed the acceptance standards of Table IWC-3410- 3410-1 shall be unacceptable for continued service
1 is acceptable for continued service without a repair / unless such components meet the requirement of IWC-
replacement activity if an analytical evaluation, as 3132.1, IWC-3132.2, or IWC-3132.3.
described in IWC-3600, meets the acceptance criteria
of IWC-3600. The area containing the flaw shall be IWC-3132.1 Acceptance by Supplemental Exami-
subsequently reexamined in accordance with IWC- nation. Components containing relevant conditions shall
2420(b) and (c). be acceptable for continued service if the results of
supplemental examination (IWC-3200) meet the require-
IWC-3124 Repair /Replacement Activity and ments of IWC-3120.
Reexamination
The repair /replacement activity and reexamination IWC-3132.2 Acceptance by Corrective Measures
shall comply with the requirements of IWA-4000. Reex- or Repair /Replacement Activity. A component con-
amination shall be conducted in accordance with the taining relevant conditions is acceptable for continued
requirements of IWA-2200; the recorded results shall service if the relevant conditions are corrected by a
demonstrate that the area subjected to the repair /replace- repair /replacement activity or by corrective measures
ment activity meets the acceptance standards of Table to the extent necessary to meet the acceptance standards
IWC-3410-1. of Table IWC-3410-1.
194
IWC-3134 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS IWC-3510.4
195
Table IWC-3410-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Table IWC-3510-1
TABLE IWC-3410-1
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
TABLE IWC-3510-1
ALLOWABLE PLANAR FLAWS
Material: Ferritic steels that meet the requirements of NC-2300 and
with specified minimum yield strength of 50 ksi or less at 100°F
Thickness, t, in.1,2
196
IWC-3510.4 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS IWC-3512.1
NOTES:
(1) Applicable to linear flaws detected by an examination method
where flaw depth dimension a is indeterminate.
(2) For intermediate thickness, linear interpolation is permissible.
Refer to IWA-3200. IWC-3512 Standards for Examination Category
C-C, Welded Attachments for Vessels,
Piping, Pumps, and Valves
IWC-3512.1 Allowable Linear Flaws
(b) Where a flaw extends beyond the examination (a) The size of an allowable flaw within the boundary
boundaries, or separate linear flaws lie both within and of the examination surfaces in Fig. IWC-2500-5 shall
beyond the boundaries but are characterized as a single not exceed the allowable flaw standards of this Article
flaw by IWA-3400, the overall flaw size shall be for the applicable supported pressure retaining compo-
compared with the standards of Table IWC-3510-3. nent to which the attachment is welded.
(b) Where a flaw extends beyond the boundaries of
the examination surfaces, or separate flaws are detected
IWC-3511 Standards for Examination Category
that lie both within and beyond the boundaries but are
C-B, Pressure Retaining Welds of
characterized as a single flaw by the rules of IWA-
Nozzles in Vessels
3000, the overall flaw size shall be compared with the
IWC-3511.1 Allowable Planar Flaws standards of IWC-3512.1(a).
(a) The size of allowable planar flaws in the nozzle (c) Where a flaw detected by a surface examination
and weld areas within the boundary of the examination method exceeds the allowable standards of IWC-
volume specified in Fig. IWC-2500-4 shall not exceed 3512.1(a), an optional volumetric examination may be
the limits specified in Table IWC-3511-1. conducted, in which case the allowable flaw standards
(b) The size of allowable planar flaws in the vessel for the volumetric examination method for the applicable
shell (or head) material adjoining the nozzle and weld supported pressure retaining component to which the
areas and within the boundary of the examination attachment is welded shall apply.
197
IWC-3513 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWC-3513.1
TABLE IWC-3511-1
ALLOWABLE PLANAR FLAWS
Material: Ferritic steels that meet the requirements of NC-2300 and
with specified minimum yield strength of 50 ksi or less at 100°F
Thickness, t, in.1,2
NOTES:
(1) Dimensions of a and ø are defined in IWA-3300. For intermediate flaw aspect ratios a / ø and tickness t, linear interpolation is permissible.
Refer to IWA-3200(b).
(2) See Fig. IWC-2500-4 for the appropriate component thickness, t.
(3) The total depth of a subsurface flaw is 2a.
(4) Y p (S /t ) / (a /t ) p S /a. If Y ≤ 0.4, the flaw is classified as a surface flaw. If Y > 1.0,use Y p 1.0.
(5) rn is the radius of the nozzle bore.
198
IWC-3513.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS IWC-3610
199
ARTICLE IWC-5000
SYSTEM PRESSURE TESTS
200
IWC-5230 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 2 COMPONENTS IWC-5240
IWC-5240 TEMPERATURE
(a) The system test temperature during a system
hydrostatic test in systems containing ferritic steel com-
ponents shall meet the requirements specified by fracture
prevention criteria.
(b) In systems containing ferritic steel components
for which fracture toughness requirements were neither
specified nor required in the construction of the compo-
nents, the system test temperature shall be determined
by the Owner.
(c) No limit on system test temperature is required
for systems comprised of components constructed en-
tirely of austenitic steel materials.
201
SUBSECTION IWD
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 3
COMPONENTS OF LIGHT-WATER
COOLED PLANTS
Figure
IWD-2500-1 Welded Attachments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
203
Tables
IWD-2411-1 Inspection Program A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
IWD-2412-1 Inspection Program B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
IWD-2500-1 Examination Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
204
ARTICLE IWD-1000
SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITY
205
2nd 7 33 67
IWD-2400 INSPECTION SCHEDULE 10 100 100
IWD-2410 INSPECTION PROGRAM 3rd 13 16 34
Inservice examinations and system pressure tests may 17 40 50
20 66 75
be performed during either system operation or plant 23 100 100
outages.
4th 27 8 16
30 25 34
IWD-2411 Inspection Program A 33 50 67
37 75 100
(a) The required examinations in each examination 40 100 ...
category shall be completed during each inspection
interval in accordance with Table IWD-2411-1, with
the exception of welded attachments examined as a
result of component support deformation under Exami-
nation Category D-A.
(b) Following completion of Program A after 40 (b) If items are added to the Inspection Program,
years, successive inspection intervals shall follow the during the service lifetime of a plant, examination shall
10 year inspection interval of Program B. be scheduled as follows:
(1) When items are added during the first period
of an interval, at least 25% of the examinations required
IWD-2412 Inspection Program B
by the applicable Examination Category and Item Num-
(a) The required examinations in each examination ber for the added items shall be performed during each
category shall be completed during each inspection of the second and third periods of that interval.
interval in accordance with Table IWD-2412-1, with (2) When items are added during the second period
the exception of welded attachments examined as a of an interval, at least 25% of the examinations required
result of component support deformation under Exami- by the applicable Examination Category and Item Num-
nation Category D-A. If there are less than three items ber for the added items shall be performed during the
to be examined in an Examination Category, the items third period of that interval.
may be examined in any two periods, or in any one (3) When items are added during the third period
period if there is only one item, in lieu of the percentage of an interval, examinations shall be scheduled in
requirements of Table IWD-2412-1. accordance with IWD-2412(a) for successive intervals.
206
207
TABLE IWD-2500-1
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
EXAMINATION CATEGORY D-A, WELDED ATTACHMENTS FOR VESSELS, PIPING, PUMPS, AND VALVES
Examination
Table IWD-2500-1
Pressure Vessels
D1.10 Welded Attachments IWD-2500-1 Visual, VT-1 IWD-3000 100% of required areas of each Each identified
welded attachment occurrence
and each
inspection
interval
Piping
D1.20 Welded Attachments IWD-2500-1 Visual, VT-1 IWD-3000 100% of required areas of each Each identified
welded attachment occurrence
and each
inspection
interval
Pumps
D1.30 Welded Attachments IWD-2500-1 Visual, VT-1 IWD-3000 100% of required areas of each Each identified
welded attachment occurrence
208
and each
inspection
interval
Valves
D1.40 Welded Attachments IWD-2500-1 Visual, VT-1 IWD-3000 100% of required areas of each Each identified
welded attachment occurrence
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
and each
inspection
interval
NOTES:
(1) Examination is limited to those welded attachments that meet the following conditions:
(a) the attachment is on the outside surface of the pressure retaining component;
(b) the attachment provides component support as defined in NF-1110;
(c) the attachment weld joins the attachment either directly to the surface of the component or to an integrally cast or forged attachment to the component; and
(d) the attachment weld is full penetration, fillet, or partial penetration, continuous, or intermittent.
(2) The extent of the examination includes essentially 100% of the length of the attachment weld at each attachment subject to examination.
(3) Selected samples of welded attachments shall be examined each inspection interval. All welded attachments selected for examination shall be those most subject
to corrosion, as determined by the Owner, such as the welded attachments of the Service Water or Emergency Service Water systems. For multiple vessels of
similar design, function and service, the welded attachments of only one of the multiple vessels shall be selected for examination. For welded attachments of piping,
pumps, and valves, a 10% sample shall be selected for examination. This percentage sample shall be proportional to the total number of nonexempt welded
attachments connected to the piping, pumps, and valves in each system subject to these examinations.
(4) Examination is required whenever component support member deformation, e.g., broken, bent, or pulled out parts, is identified during operation, refueling,
maintenance, examination, or testing.
TABLE IWD-2500-1 (CONT’D)
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
D2.10 Pressure retaining components System leakage Visual, VT-2 IWD-3000 Pressure retaining boundary Each inspection
test (IWD-5221) period
209
D2.20 Pressure retaining components System hydrostatic Visual, VT-2 IWD-3000 Pressure retaining boundary Each inspection
test (IWD-5222) interval1
NOTES:
(1) The system hydrostatic test (IWD-5222) shall be conducted at or near the end of each inspection interval or during the same inspection period of each inspection
interval of Inspection Program B.
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 3 COMPONENTS
Table IWD-2500-1
Fig. IWD-2500-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
210
ARTICLE IWD-3000
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
211
ARTICLE IWD-5000
SYSTEM PRESSURE TESTS
IWD-5200 SYSTEM TEST REQUIREMENTS (b) The test presure for a pneumatic test conducted
in accordance with IWA-5211(c) shall be the system
IWD-5210 TEST
leakage test pressure of IWC-5221.
(a) Pressure retaining components shall be tested at (c) In the case of atmospheric storage tanks, the
the frequency stated in, and visually examined by the hydrostatic head, developed with the tank filled to its
methods specified in Table IWD-2500-1, Examination design capacity, shall be acceptable as the test pressure.
Category D-B: (d) For 0–15 psi (0–103 kPa) storage tanks, the test
(1) System Leakage Test, IWA-5211(a) pressure shall be 1.1PG, Design Pressure of vapor or
(2) System Hydrostatic Test, IWA-5211(b) gas space above liquid level for which overpressure
(b)(1) The system pressure tests and visual examina- protection is provided by relief valve.
tions shall be conducted in accordance with IWA-5000 (e) For the purpose of the test, open ended1 portions
and this Article. The contained fluid in the system of suction or drain lines from a storage tank extending
shall serve as the pressurizing medium. to the first shutoff valve shall be considered as an
(2) Alternatively, steam systems may use either extension of the storage tank.
water or gas as the pressurizing medium. When gas (f) For open ended portions of discharge lines beyond
is the pressurizing medium, the test procedure shall the last shutoff valve in nonclosed systems (e.g., service
include methods for detection and location of through- water systems), confirmation of adequate flow during
wall leakage from components of the system tested. system operation shall be acceptable in lieu of system
hydrostatic test.
(g) Open ended vent and drain lines from components
extending beyond the last shutoff valve and open ended
IWD-5220 PRESSURE safety or relief valve discharge lines, including safety
IWD-5221 System Leakage Test or relief valve piping which discharges into the contain-
ment pressure suppression pool, shall be exempt from
The nominal operating pressure during system opera- hydrostatic test.
tion shall be acceptable as the test pressure for the (h) The pressure measuring instrument used for mea-
system leakage test. suring system hydrostatic or pneumatic test pressure
shall meet the requirements of IWA-5260.
98 IWD-5222 System Hydrostatic Test
(a) The system hydrostatic test pressure shall be at IWD-5230 TEMPERATURE
least 1.10 times the system pressure Psv for systems
(a) The system test temperature during a system
with Design Temperature of 200°F or less, and at least
hydrostatic test in systems constructed of ferritic steel
1.25 times the system pressure Psv for systems with
components shall satisfy either the requirements of
Design Temperature above 200°F (93°C). The system
fracture prevention criteria, as applicable, or the test
pressure Psv shall be the lowest pressure setting among
temperature determined by the Owner.
the number of safety or relief valves provided for
overpressure protection within the boundary of the
1 Discharge lines to structural compartments (e.g., service water pump
system to be tested. For systems (or portions of systems)
intake structures) and collection tanks, sumps, and basins that are
not provided with safety or relief valves, the system open (or may become open) to the atmosphere are considered
design pressure Pd shall be substituted for Psv. open ended.
212
IWD-5230 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 3 COMPONENTS IWD-5240
IWD-5240 BOUNDARIES
(a) The pressure retaining boundary includes only
those portions of the system required to operate or
support the safety function up to and including the
first normally closed valve (including a safety or relief
valve) or valve capable of automatic closure when the
safety function is required.
(b) Items outside the boundaries of IWD-5240(a),
and open ended discharge piping, are excluded from
the examination requirements.
213
SUBSECTION IWE A99
215
Figure
IWE-2500-1 Examination Areas for Moisture Barriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
Tables
IWE-2411-1 Inspection Program A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
IWE-2412-1 Inspection Program B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
IWE-2500-1 Examination Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222
IWE-2500-2 Ultrasonic Thickness Measurements for Augmented Examinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224
216
217
IWE-1232 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWE-1242
(3) the vessel is leak rate tested after completion or repeated loss of protective coatings has resulted in
of construction or repair /replacement activities to the substantial corrosion and pitting. Typical locations of
leak rate requirements of the Design Specifications. such areas are those exposed to standing water, repeated
(b) Portions of Class CC metallic shell and penetra- wetting and drying, persistent leakage, and those with
tion liners that are embedded in concrete or otherwise geometries that permit water accumulation, condensa-
made inaccessible during construction or as a result of tion, and microbiological attack. Such areas may include
repair /replacement activities are exempted from exami- penetration sleeves, stiffeners, surfaces wetted during
nation, provided: refueling, concrete-to-steel shell or liner interfaces, em-
(1) all welded joints that are inaccessible for exam- bedment zones, leak chase channels, drain areas, or
ination are examined in accordance with CC-5520 and, sump liners.
prior to being covered or otherwise obstructed by (b) interior and exterior containment surface areas
adjacent structures, components, parts, or appurtenances, that are subject to excessive wear from abrasion or
are tested for leak tightness in accordance with CC- erosion that causes a loss of protective coatings, defor-
5536; and mation, or material loss. Typical locations of such areas
(2) the containment is leak rate tested after comple- are those subject to substantial traffic, sliding pads or
tion of construction or repair /replacement activities to supports, pins or clevises, shear lugs, seismic restraints,
the leak rate requirements of the Design Specifications. surfaces exposed to water jets from testing operations
or safety relief valve discharges, and areas that experi-
ence wear from frequent vibrations.
IWE-1240 SURFACE AREAS REQUIRING (c) interior and exterior containment surface areas
AUGMENTED EXAMINATION identified in accordance with IWE-2420(b).
98 IWE-1241 Examination Surface Areas
IWE-1242 Identification of Examination Surface 98
Surface areas likely to experience accelerated degra-
Areas
dation and aging require the augmented examinations
identified in Table IWE-2500-1, Examination Category Surface areas requiring augmented examination shall
E-C. Such areas include the following: be determined in accordance with IWE-1241, and shall
(a) interior and exterior containment surface areas be identified in the Owner’s Inspection Program.
that are subject to accelerated corrosion with no or Examination methods shall be in accordance with
minimal corrosion allowance or areas where the absence IWE-2500(b).
218
ARTICLE IWE-2000
EXAMINATION AND INSPECTION
219
220
221
ASME B&PVC
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
E1.11 Accessible Surface Areas IWE-2310 General Visual IWE-3510 100% 100% N/A
During each During each
Inspection Period Inspection Period
E1.12 Wetted Surfaces of Submerged Areas IWE-2310 General Visual IWE-3510 100% 100% Permissible
E1.20 BWR Vent System IWE-2310 General Visual IWE-3510 100% 100% Permissible
222
Accessible Surface Areas1,2
E1.30 Moisture Barriers3 IWE-2310 General Visual IWE-3510 100% 100% N/A
Fig. IWE-2500-1 During each During each
NOTES:
(1) Examination shall include all accessible interior and exterior surfaces of Class MC components, parts, and appurtenances, and metallic
shell and penetration liners of Class CC components. The following items shall be considered for examination:
(a) integral attachments and structures that are parts of reinforcing structure, such as stiffening rings, manhole frames, and reinforcement
around openings.
(b) surfaces of attachment welds between structural attachments and the pressure retaining boundary or reinforcing structure, except for
nonstructural or temporary attachments as defined in NE-4435 and minor permanent attachments as defined in CC-4543.4.
(c) surfaces of containment structural and pressure boundary welds, including longitudinal welds (Category A), circumferential welds
(Category B), flange welds (Category C), and nozzle-to-shell welds (Category D) as defined in NE-3351 for Class MC and CC-3840
for Class CC; and surfaces of Flued Head and Bellows Seal Circumferential Welds joined to the Penetration.
(d) pressure-retaining bolted connections, including bolts, studs, nuts, bushings, washers, and threads in base material and flange ligaments
between fastener holes. Bolted connections need not be dissassembled for performance of examinations, and bolting may remain in
place under tension.
(2) Includes flow channeling devices within containment vessels.
(3) Examination shall include moisture barrier materials intended to prevent intrusion of moisture against inaccessible areas of the pressure retaining metal containment shell or liner at
concrete-to-metal interfaces and at metal-to-metal interfaces which are not seal-welded. Containment moisture barrier materials include caulking, flashing, and other sealants used for
this application.
E4.11 Visible Surfaces IWE-2310(c) Detailed Visual IWE-3511 100% of surface 100% of surface Not permissible
IWE-2500(b)(1) areas identified by areas identified by
IWE-2500(b)(2) IWE-12421 IWE-12422
223
E4.12 Surface Area Grid IWE-2500(b)(2) Ultrasonic Thickness IWE-3511 100% of gridline 100% of gridline Not permissible
Gridline Intersections and Minimum Wall IWE-2500(b)(3) intersections and intersections and
Thickness Location IWE-2500(b)(4) minimum wall minimum wall
thickness locations thickness locations
during each during each
inspection period, inspection period,
established in established in
accordance with accordance with
IWE-2500(b)(3)2 IWE-2500(b)(3)2
and and
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS MC COMPONENTS
IWE-2500(b)(4)2 IWE-2500(b)(4)2
NOTES:
(1) Containment surface areas requiring augmented examination are those identified in IWE-1240.
(2) The extent of examination shall be 100% for each inspection period until the areas examined remain essentially unchanged for the next
inspection period. Such areas no longer require augmented examination in accordance with IWE-2420(c).
Table IWE-2500-1
ASME B&PVC
Table IWE-2500-2
NOTES:
(1) Location and size of area to be examined shall be determined by the Owner.
(2) Gridline spacing shall not exceed 12 in., and need not be less than 2 in.
(3) Gridline spacing shall be selected such that a minimum of 100 measurements are obtained from within each augmented examination area, unless this requires selecting gridline
spacing of less than 2 in.
(4) In lieu of examining 100% of the gridline intersections within the augmented examination area, an alternate examination plan may be developed as follows:
(a) A sample area from within the augmented examination area may be selected for examination. The location and size of the sample area shall be determined by the Owner, but
224
shall consist of areas subject to the most severe service conditions within the larger augmented examination area. 100% of the gridline intersections within the sample area
shall be examined, and gridline spacing shall be selected such that a minimum of 100 measurements are obtained from within the sample area.
(b) If the sample area exceeds 100 contiguous square feet, the Owner may develop a sampling plan for examination of gridline intersections within the sample area. Locations
of ultrasonic thickness measurements to be taken at gridline intersections shall be selected at random throughout the sample area. The minimum number of measurements
remaining gridline intersections within the sample area shall be examined, and additional UT examinations from outside the sample area shall be required. These additional
UT examinations shall be performed on another area from within the larger augmented examination area that is at least as large as the initial sample area. If any of these
subsequent examinations reveal that the thickness of the base metal is reduced by more than 10% of the nominal plate thickness, additional areas from within the larger
augmented examination area shall be examined until subsequent examinations of additional areas reveal no measurements where metal loss exceeds 10% of the nominal plate
thickness, or until the entire augmented examination area has been examined.
(5) When an ultrasonic thickness measurement performed at a gridline intersection reveals that the thickness of the base metal is reduced by more than 10% of the nominal plate
thickness, the minimum wall thickness shall be determined and located within each adjoining grid.
(6) Measurements need not be obtained at locations where obstructions interfere with gridline intersections.
225
ARTICLE IWE-3000
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
226
IWE-3122.3 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS MC COMPONENTS IWE-3511.2
Specifications, the component is acceptable by engi- for service following the preservice examination and
neering evaluation. each inservice examination.
(b) When flaws or areas of degradation are accepted
by engineering evaluation, the area containing the flaw
IWE-3430 ACCEPTABILITY
or degradation shall be reexamined in accordance with
IWE-2420(b) and (c). Flaws or areas of degradation that do not exceed
(c) When portions of later editions of the Construc- the allowable acceptance standards of IWE-3500 for
tion Code or Section III are used, all related portions the respective examination category shall be acceptable.
shall be met.
227
228
REPAIR PROCEDURES
IWE-4100 SCOPE
The rules of IWA-4000 apply.
229
ARTICLE IWE-5000
SYSTEM PRESSURE TESTS
IWE-5200 SYSTEM TEST REQUIREMENTS performed in accordance with the Repair /Replacement
Program and Plan:
IWE-5210 GENERAL (a) welds of attachments to the surface of the pressure
Except as noted in IWE-5240, the requirements of retaining boundary;
IWA-5000 are not applicable to Class MC or Class (b) weld cavities, the depth of which does not pene-
CC components. trate the required design wall by more than 10%;
and
(c) welds attaching penetrations that are NPS 1
(DN25) or smaller.
IWE-5220 TESTS FOLLOWING REPAIR /
REPLACEMENT ACTIVITIES IWE-5240 VISUAL EXAMINATION 98
98 IWE-5221 Leakage Test During the pressure test required by IWE-5220, a
Except as noted in IWE-5222, repair /replacement detailed visual examination (IWE-2310) shall be per-
activities performed on the pressure retaining boundary formed on areas affected by repair/replacement activ-
of Class MC or Class CC components shall be subjected ities.
to a pneumatic leakage test in accordance with the
provisions of Title 10, Part 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Appendix J, Paragraph IV.A. IWE-5250 CORRECTIVE ACTION 98
230
ARTICLE IWE-7000 98
REPLACEMENTS
231
SUBSECTION IWF
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1, 2, 3, AND MC
COMPONENT SUPPORTS OF
LIGHT-WATER COOLED PLANTS
233
IWF-3200 Supplemental Examinations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243
IWF-3400 Acceptance Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243
IWF-3410 Acceptance Standards — Component Support Structural Integrity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243
Figure
IWF-1300-1 Illustrations of Typical Support Examination Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236
Tables
IWF-2410-1 Inspection Program A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
IWF-2410-2 Inspection Program B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
IWF-2500-1 Examination Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
234
ARTICLE IWF-1000
SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITY
235
Fig. IWF-1300-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
236
REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPONENT SUPPORTS Fig. IWF-1300-1
237
ARTICLE IWF-2000
EXAMINATION AND INSPECTION
2nd 7 33 67
IWF-2200 PRESERVICE EXAMINATION 10 100 100
238
IWF-2410 REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPONENT SUPPORTS IWF-2500
239
IWF-2510 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWF-2520
240
TABLE IWF-2500-1
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
Examination
Item1 Requirements / Examination Acceptance Extent and Exami- Frequency of
No. Support Types Examined Fig. No. Method Standard nation Examination4
F1.10 Class 1 Piping Supports IWF-1300-1 Visual, VT-3 IWF-3410 25% of Class 12 Each inspection
interval
F1.20 Class 2 Piping Supports IWF-1300-1 Visual, VT-3 IWF-3410 15% of Class 22 Each inspection
interval
F1.30 Class 3 Piping Supports IWF-1300-1 Visual, VT-3 IWF-3410 10% of Class 32 Each inspection
interval
F1.40 Supports Other Than Piping Supports IWF-1300-1 Visual, VT-3 IWF-3410 100% of the supports3 Each inspection
(Class 1, 2, 3, and MC) interval
241
REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPONENT SUPPORTS
NOTES:
(1) Item numbers shall be categorized to identify support types by component support function (e.g., A p supports such as one directional rod hangers; B p
supports such as multi-directional restraints; and C p supports that allow thermal movement, such as springs).
(2) The total percentage sample shall be comprised of supports from each system (such as Main Steam, Feedwater, or RHR), where the individual sample sizes
are proportional to the total number of non-exempt supports of each type and function within each system.
(3) For multiple components other than piping, within a system of similar design, function, and service, the supports of only one of the multiple components
are required to be examined.
(4) To the extent practical, the same supports selected for examination during the first inspection interval shall be examined during each successive inspection
interval.
Table IWF-2500-1
ARTICLE IWF-3000
STANDARDS FOR EXAMINATION EVALUATIONS
IWF-3112 Acceptance
IWF-3120 INSERVICE EXAMINATIONS
IWF-3112.1 Acceptance by Examination. Compo-
nent supports whose examinations do not reveal condi- IWF-3121 General
tions described in IWF-3410(a) shall be acceptable for Inservice nondestructive examinations performed dur-
service. ing or at the end of successive inspection intervals
IWF-3112.2 Acceptance by Correction. A support to meet the requirements of Table IWF-2500-1 and
whose examination detects conditions described in IWF- conducted in accordance with the procedures of IWA-
3410(a) is unacceptable for service until such conditions 2200 shall be evaluated by comparing the results of
are corrected by one or more of the following: examinations with the acceptance standards specified
(a) adjustment and reexamination in accordance with in IWF-3400.
IWF-2200 for conditions such as
(1) detached or loosened mechanical connections;
IWF-3122 Acceptance
(2) improper hot or cold settings of spring supports
and constant load supports; IWF-3122.1 Acceptance by Examination. Compo-
(3) misalignment of supports; or nent supports whose examinations do not reveal condi-
(4) improper displacement settings of guides tions described in IWF-3410(a) shall be acceptable for
and stops. continued service. Verified changes of conditions from
(b) repair /replacement activities in accordance with prior examinations shall be recorded in accordance with
IWA-4000 and reexamination in accordance with IWA-6230.
IWF-2200.
IWF-3122.2 Acceptance by Correction. A support
IWF-3112.3 Acceptance by Evaluation or Test whose examination detects conditions described in IWF-
(a) As an alternative to the requirements of IWF- 3410(a) is unacceptable for continued service until such
3112.2, a component support or a portion of a compo- conditions are corrected by one or more of the following:
nent support containing relevant conditions that do not (a) adjustment and reexamination in accordance with
meet the acceptance standards of IWF-3410 shall be IWF-2200 for conditions such as
acceptable for service without corrective measures if (1) detached or loosened mechanical connections;
an evaluation or test demonstrates that the component (2) improper hot or cold settings of spring supports
support is acceptable for service. and constant load supports;
242
IWF-3122.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPONENT SUPPORTS IWF-3410
(3) misalignment of supports; or examinations that detect surface flaws that exceed IWF-
(4) improper displacement settings of guides 3400 criteria may be supplemented by either surface
and stops. or volumetric examinations.
(b) repair /replacement activities in accordance with
IWA-4000 and reexamination in accordance with
IWF-2200. IWF-3400 ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
IWF-3122.3 Acceptance by Evaluation or Test IWF-3410 ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS —
(a) As an alternative to the requirements of IWF- COMPONENT SUPPORT
3122.2, a component support or a portion of a compo- STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY
nent support containing relevant conditions that do not (a) Component support conditions which are unac-
meet the acceptance standards of IWF-3410 shall be ceptable for continued service shall include the fol-
acceptable for service without corrective measures if lowing:
an evaluation or test demonstrates that the component (1) deformations or structural degradations of fas-
support is acceptable for service. teners, springs, clamps, or other support items;
(b) If a component support or a portion of a compo- (2) missing, detached, or loosened support items;
nent support has been evaluated or tested and determined (3) arc strikes, weld spatter, paint, scoring,
to be acceptable for service in accordance with IWF- roughness, or general corrosion on close tolerance ma-
3122.3(a), the Owner may perform corrective measures chined or sliding surfaces;
to restore the component support to its original design (4) improper hot or cold settings of spring supports
condition. The requirements of IWF-2220 are not appli- and constant load supports;
cable after corrective measures of IWF-3122.2(a) are (5) misalignment of supports;
performed. (6) improper clearances of guides and stops.
(c) Records and reports shall meet the requirements (b) Except as defined in IWF-3410(a), the following
of IWA-6000. are examples of nonrelevant conditions:
(1) fabrication marks (e.g., from punching, layout,
bending, rolling, and machining);
IWF-3200 SUPPLEMENTAL (2) chipped or discolored paint;
EXAMINATIONS (3) weld spatter on other than close tolerance
machined or sliding surfaces;
Examinations that detect conditions that require evalu- (4) scratches and surface abrasion marks;
ation in accordance with the requirements of IWF-3100 (5) roughness or general corrosion which does not
may be supplemented by other examination methods reduce the load bearing capacity of the support;
and techniques (IWA-2000) to determine the character (6) general conditions acceptable by the material,
of the flaw (that is, size, shape, and orientation). Visual Design, and /or Construction Specifications.
243
ARTICLE IWF-5000
INSERVICE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR
SNUBBERS
244
SUBSECTION IWL
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS CC
CONCRETE COMPONENTS OF
LIGHT-WATER COOLED PLANTS
245
IWL-2525.2 Sample Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
IWL-2526 Removal and Replacement of Corrosion Protection Medium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
Tables
IWL-2500-1 Examination Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
246
IWL-2521-1 Number of Tendons for Examination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
IWL-2525-1 Corrosion Protection Medium Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
247
ARTICLE IWL-1000
SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITY
249
ARTICLE IWL-2000
EXAMINATION AND INSPECTION
250
IWL-2310 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS CC COMPONENTS IWL-2421
(4) to determine the condition of concrete surfaces completed within this stated time interval, examination
affected by repair/replacement activities, in accordance of those portions may be deferred until the next regularly
with IWL-5250. scheduled plant outage.
(c) Visual examinations shall be performed directly (c) The 10 year and subsequent examinations shall
or remotely, with adequate illumination, by personnel commence not more than 1 year prior to the specified
with visual acuity sufficient to detect evidence of degra- dates and shall be completed not more than 1 year
dation. after such dates. If plant operating conditions are such
(d) The Owner shal define qualification requirements that examination of portions of the concrete cannot be
for personnel performing examinations of concrete and completed within this stated time interval, examination
tendon anchorage hardware, wires, or strands. of those portions may be deferred until the next regularly
(e) The Owner shall define requirements for visual scheduled plant outage.
examination of tendon achorage hardware, wires, or
strands.
IWL-2420 UNBONDED POST-TENSIONING
SYSTEMS
IWL-2320 RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER
(a) Unbonded post-tensioning systems shall be exam-
The Responsible Engineer shall be a Registered ined in accordance with IWL-2520 at 1, 3, and 5 years
Professional Engineer experienced in evaluating the following the completion of the containment Structural
condition of structural concrete. The Responsible Engi- Integrity Test and every 5 years thereafter.
neer shall have knowledge of the design and Construc- (b) The 1, 3, and 5 year examinations shall commence
tion Codes and other criteria used in design and con- not more than 6 months prior to the specified dates
struction of concrete containments in nuclear power and shall be completed not more than 6 months after
plants. such dates. If plant operating conditions are such that
The Responsible Engineer shall be responsible for examination of portions of the post-tensioning system
the following: cannot be completed within this stated time interval,
(a) development of plans and procedures for examina- examination of those portions may be deferred until
tion of concrete surfaces; the next regularly scheduled plant outage.
(b) approval, instruction, and training of concrete (c) The 10 year and subsequent examinations shall
examination personnel; commence not more than 1 year prior to the specified
(c) evaluation of examination results; dates and shall be completed not more than 1 year
(d) preparation or review of Repair /Replacement after such dates.
Plans and procedures;
(e) review of procedures for pressure tests following
repair/replacement activities; IWL-2421 Sites With Multiple Plants
(f) submittal of a report to the Owner documenting re- (a) For sites with multiple plants, the examination
sults of examinations, repair /replacement activities, and requirements for the concrete containments may be
pressure tests. modified if the containments utilize the same pre-
stressing system and are essentially identical in design,
if post-tensioning operations for each subsequent con-
IWL-2400 INSERVICE INSPECTION tainment constructed at the site were completed not
SCHEDULE more than 2 years apart, and if the containments are
similarly exposed to or protected from the outside
IWL-2410 CONCRETE
environment.
(a) Concrete shall be examined in accordance with (b) When the conditions of IWL-2421(a) are met,
IWL-2510 at 1, 3, and 5 years following the completion the inspection dates and examination requirements may
of the containment Structural Integrity Test CC-6000 be as follows.
and every 5 years thereafter. (1) For the containment with the first Structural
(b) The 1, 3, and 5 year examinations shall commence Integrity Test, all examinations required by IWL-2500
not more than 6 months prior to the specified dates shall be performed at 1, 3, and 10 years and every
and shall be completed not more than 6 months after 10 years thereafter. Only the examinations required by
such dates. If plant operating conditions are such that IWL-2524 and IWL-2525 need be performed at 5 and
examination of portions of the concrete cannot be 15 years and every 10 years thereafter.
251
IWL-2421 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IWL-2522
(2) For each subsequent containment constructed not examined during earlier inspections. The number
at the site, all examinations required by IWL-2500 of tendons to be examined during an inspection shall
shall be performed at 1, 5, and 15 years and every be as specified in Table IWL-2521-1.
10 years thereafter. Only the examinations required by (b) One tendon of each type (as defined in Table
IWL-2524 and IWL-2525 need be performed at 3 and IWL-2521-1) shall be selected from the first year inspec-
10 years and every 10 years thereafter. tion sample and designated as a common tendon. Each
common tendon shall be examined during each inspec-
tion. A common tendon shall not be detensioned unless
IWL-2500 EXAMINATION required by IWL-3300. If a common tendon is deten-
sioned, another common tendon of the same type shall
REQUIREMENTS
be selected from the first year inspection sample.
Examination shall be performed in accordance with (c) If a containment with a stranded post-tensioning
the requirements of Table IWL-2500-1. system is constructed with a predesignated number of
detensionable tendons, one tendon of each type shall
be selected from among those that are detensionable.
IWL-2510 SURFACE EXAMINATION The remaining tendons shall be selected from among
those that cannot be detensioned.
(a) Concrete surface areas, including coated areas,
except those exempted by IWL-1220(b), shall be visu- IWL-2521.1 Exemptions. The following require-
ally examined in accordance with IWL-2310(a) for ments shall apply to tendon anchorages that are not
evidence of conditions indicative of damage or degra- accessible for examination because of safety or radiolog-
dation, such as defined in ACI 201.1. Selected areas, ical hazards or because of structural obstructions.
such as those that indicate suspect conditions, shall be (a) After the process of randomly selecting tendons
visually examined in accordance with IWL-2310(b). to be examined, any inaccessible tendons shall be
(b) Tendon anchorage areas, including coated areas, designated as exempt and removed from the sample.
except those exempted by IWL-1220(a), shall be visually (b) Substitute tendons shall be selected for all tendons
examined in accordance with IWL-2310(b) for evidence designated as exempt. Each substitute tendon shall be
of conditions indicating damage or degradation. Selected selected so that it is located as close as possible to
areas, such as those that indicate suspect conditions, the exempted tendon, and shall be examined in accord-
shall be subject to additional examinations, if specified ance with IWL-2520.
by the Responsible Engineer. (c) Each exempted tendon shall be examined in
(c) For containments with unbonded post-tensioning accordance with IWL-2524 and IWL-2525 to the extent
systems, the concrete surfaces and tendon end anchorage that the end anchorages of the exempt tendon are
areas shall be examined for corrosion protection medium accessible either during operation or at an outage.
leakage, and the tendon end caps shall be examined
for deformation.
(d) The examination shall be performed by, or under IWL-2522 Tendon Force and Elongation
the direction of, the Responsible Engineer. Measurements
(e) Visual examinations may be performed from (a) The prestressing force in all inspection sample
floors, roofs, platforms, walkways, ladders, ground sur- tendons shall be measured by lift-off or an equiva-
face, or other permanent vantage points, unless tempo- lent test.
rary close-in access is required by the inspection plan. (b) Equipment used to measure tendon force shall
be calibrated in accordance with a calibration procedure
prior to the first tendon force measurement and following
IWL-2520 EXAMINATION OF UNBONDED the final tendon force measurement of the inspection
POST-TENSIONING SYSTEMS period. Accuracy of the calibration shall be within
1.5% of the specified minimum ultimate strength of
IWL-2521 Tendon Selection
the tendon. If the post-test calibration differs from the
(a) Tendons to be examined during an inspection pretest calibration by more than the specified accuracy
shall be selected on a random basis except as noted tolerance, the results of the examination shall be eval-
in IWL-2521(b) and (c). The population from which uated.
the random sample is drawn shall consist of all tendons (c) During retensioning of a tendon, the tendon elon-
of a particular type (as defined in Table IWC-2521-1) gation shall be measured.
252
TABLE IWL-2500-1
EXAMINATION CATEGORIES
L1.11 All Accessible Surface Areas IWL-2510 General Visual IWL-3210 IWL-2510 IWL-2410 NA
253
EXAMINATION CATEGORY L-B, UNBONDED POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM
L2.30 Anchorage Hardware and Surrounding Concrete IWL-2524 Detailed Visual IWL-3221.3 IWL-2524.1 IWL-2420 NA
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS CC COMPONENTS
254
IWL-2526 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS CC COMPONENTS IWL-2526
TABLE IWL-2525-1
CORROSION PROTECTION MEDIUM ANALYSIS
where
B p milliliters NaOH
NA p normality of H2SO4 solution
NB p normality of NaOH solution
W p weight of sample in grams
(3) The base number shall be at least 50% of the as-installed value, unless the as-installed value is 5 or
less, in which case the base number shall be no less than zero. If the tendon duct is filled with a mixture of
materials having various as-installed base numbers, the lowest number shall govern acceptance.
255
ARTICLE IWL-3000
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
256
IWL-3221.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS CC COMPONENTS IWL-3310
ment from the previous examination, indicate a prestress IWL-3222 Acceptance by Evaluation
loss such that predicted tendon forces meet the minimum
Items with examination results that do not meet the
design prestress forces at the next scheduled examina-
acceptance standards of IWL-3221 shall be evaluated
tion; and
as required by IWL-3300.
(d) the measured tendon elongation varies from the
last measurement, adjusted for effective wires or strands,
by less than 10%. IWL-3223 Acceptance by Repair /Replacement
Activity
IWL-3221.2 Tendon Wire or Strand Samples. The Repair /replacement activities to reestablish accept-
condition of wire or strand samples is acceptable if: ability of the condition of an item shall be completed
(a) samples are free of physical damage; as required by IWL-3300. Acceptable completion of
(b) sample ultimate tensile strength and elongation the repair /replacement activity shall constitute accept-
are not less than minimum specified values. ability of the item.
257
ARTICLE IWL-4000
REPAIR /REPLACEMENT ACTIVITIES
The Repair /Replacement Plan shall be developed Damaged reinforcing steel shall be corrected by any
under the direction of a Responsible Engineer (IWL- method permitted in the original Construction Code or
2300). in Section III, Division 2, with or without removal of
the damaged reinforcing steel.
IWL-4220 CONCRETE
IWL-4240 POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM
(a) The Repair /Replacement Plan shall specify re-
quirements for removal of defective material. (a) Welding of bearing plates and shim plates of
(b) The affected area shall be visually examined the post-tensioning system shall meet the applicable
to assure proper surface preparation of concrete and requirements of IWA-4000. The corrosion protection
reinforcing steel prior to placement of concrete. medium shall be restored following the repair /replace-
(c) When removal of defective material exposes rein- ment activity.
forcing steel, the reinforcing steel shall receive a detailed (b) The following items, as applicable, shall be con-
visual examination as defined in IWL-2310(b). Reinforc- tained in the Repair /Replacement Plan:
ing steel is acceptable when the Responsible Engineer (1) requirements for removal of items;
determines that there is no evidence of damage or (2) surface preparation required prior to installation
degradation sufficient to warrant further evaluation or of items;
repair. When required, reinforcing steel shall be repaired (3) examinations required prior to installation of
in accordance with IWL-4230. Repair /replacement ac- items;
258
IWL-4240 REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS CC COMPONENTS IWL-4300
IWL-4300 EXAMINATION
Areas of repair /replacement activities shall be exam-
ined in accordance with IWL-2000 to establish a new
preservice record and shall meet the acceptance stan-
dards of IWL-3000.
259
ARTICLE IWL-5000
SYSTEM PRESSURE TESTS
260
SUBSECTION IWP
INSERVICE TESTING OF PUMPS
IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
261
ARTICLE IWP-1000
REQUIREMENTS
263
SUBSECTION IWV
INSERVICE TESTING OF VALVES
IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
265
ARTICLE IWV-1000
REQUIREMENTS
267
MANDATORY APPENDICES A99
I-Supplements
I-Supplement 1 Calibration Block Material and Thickness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
I-Supplement 2 Calibration Blocks for Clad Welds or Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
I-Supplement 3 Calibration Blocks for Examination of Parts With Curved Surfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
I-Supplement 4 Alternative Weld Calibration Block Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282
I-Supplement 5 Electronic Simulators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
I-Supplement 6 Pulse Repetition Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
I-Supplement 7 Instrument Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
I-Supplement 8 Scan Overlap and Search Unit Oscillation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
I-Supplement 9 Scan Angles. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
I-Supplement 10 Recording Criteria. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284
I-Supplement 11 Geometric Indications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
I-Supplement 12 Flaw Sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
269
270
III-Supplement
III-Supplement 1 Austenitic and Dissimiliar Metal Welds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310–312
IV-Supplements
IV-Supplement 1 Equipment Characterization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
IV-Supplement 2 Qualification Requirements for Surface Examination of Piping and Vessels . . . . . . . 323
IV-Supplement 3 Qualification Requirements for Surface Examination of Bolting — Center Bore
Holes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324
IV-Supplement A Data Acquisition Procedure Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325
IV-Supplement B Data Analysis Procedure Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326
271
VI-Supplements
VI-Supplement 1 Content of Initial Training Course . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
272
273
VII-Supplements
VII-Supplement 1 Minimum Content of Initial Training Courses for the Ultrasonic Examination
Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350
VIII-Supplements
VIII-Supplement 1 Evaluating Electronic Characteristics of Ultrasonic Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
VIII-Supplement 2 Qualification Requirements for Wrought Austenitic Piping Welds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366
VIII-Supplement 3 Qualification Requirements for Ferritic Piping Welds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367
VIII-Supplement 4 Qualification Requirements for the Clad /Base Metal Interface of Reactor Vessel . . 367
VIII-Supplement 5 Qualification Requirements for Nozzle Inside Radius Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369
VIII-Supplement 6 Qualification Requirements for Reactor Vessel Welds Other Than Clad /Base
Metal Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369
VIII-Supplement 7 Qualification Requirements for Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
274
Figures
I-S4 Alternative Calibration Block. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283
III-3230-1 Example of Physical Restrictions to the Weld Examination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 303
III-3230-2 Recommended Design for Basic Piping Calibration Blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304
III-3430-1 Allowable Notch Configurations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307
III-S1-1 ........................................................................... 310
III-S1-2 ........................................................................... 310
III-S1-3 ........................................................................... 311
III-S1-4 ........................................................................... 311
III-S2-1 Linearity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
2.3.2-1 Instrument Linearity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
VIII-S1-1A System Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
VIII-S1-1B Test Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
VIII-S1-2A Frequency Response Curve. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
VIII-S4-1 Definition of Statistical Parameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
275
Tables
I-2000-1 Required Supplements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281
III-2120-1 Maximum Nominal Search Unit Sizes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
III-3430-1 Surface Notch Depths for Ultrasonic Calibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 306
III-S3-1 Specified Limits for Echo Amplitude. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
IV-3110-1 ........................................................................... 317
VII-4110-1 Required Experience for Initial Certification for Ultrasonic Examination (Hours) . . . 345
VII-4220-1 Initial Training Hours (Classroom /Laboratory) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346
VIII-3110-1 Component Qualification Supplements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
VIII-S2-1 Performance Demonstration Detection Test Acceptance Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366
VIII-S4-1 Performance Demonstration Detection Test Acceptance Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368
VIII-S6-1 Detection and Sizing Test Flaws and Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
VIII-S6-2 Performance Demonstration Detection Test Acceptance Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
VIII-S7-1 Flaw Locations and Orientations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
VIII-S8-1 Maximum Notch Dimensions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
IX-3200-1 Stress Limits for Design and Service Loadings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385
276
APPENDIX I
ULTRASONIC EXAMINATIONS
277
ARTICLE I-1000
INTRODUCTION
I-1100 SCOPE
This Appendix provides rules for the ultrasonic exam-
ination required by IWA-2232.
279
ARTICLE I-2000
EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS
I-2100 VESSELS GREATER THAN 2 in. I-2200 VESSELS NOT GREATER THAN
(51 mm) IN THICKNESS 2 in. (51 mm) IN THICKNESS
98 I-2110 REACTOR VESSELS AND ALL PIPING WELDS
I-2210 VESSELS
(a) Ultrasonic examination procedures, equipment,
and personnel used to detect and size flaws in reactor Ultrasonic examination of vessels not greater than
vessels greater than 2 in. (51 mm) in thickness shall 2 in. in thickness shall be conducted in accordance
be qualified by performance demonstration in accord- with Appendix III, as supplemented by Table I-2000-1.
ance with Appendix VIII for the following specific
examinations and no other I-2000 requirements apply.
(1) Shell and Head Welds Excluding Flange Welds
(2) Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds
(3) Nozzle Inside Radius Section
(4) Clad /Base Metal Interface Region I-2220 WELDS IN PIPING
(b) Ultrasonic examination of reactor vessel-to-flange Ultrasonic examination procedures, equipment, and
welds, closure head-to-flange welds, and integral attach- personnel used to detect and size flaws in piping welds
ment welds shall be conducted in accordance with shall be qualified by performance demonstration in
Article 4 of Section V, except that alternative examina- accordance with Appendix VIII and no other I-2000
tion beam angles may be used. These examinations requirements apply.
shall be further supplemented by Table I-2000-1.
(c) Ultrasonic examination of reactor vessel CRD
housing welds (if applicable) shall be conducted in
accordance with Appendix III, as supplemented by
Table I-2000-1.
(d) Appendix M provides guidance that may be I-2300 BOLTS AND STUDS
used for validation of mathematical models used with
Ultrasonic examination procedures, equipment, and
procedure qualification in accordance with Appendix
personnel used to detect flaws in bolts and studs
VIII.
shall be qualified by performance demonstration in
accordance with Appendix VIII and no other I-2000
requirements apply.
280
I-2500 APPENDIX I — MANDATORY I-2500
TABLE I-2000-1
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTS
Reactor Vessel
Flange and Reactor Vessel Other Other
Attachment CRD Housing Vessels Vessels ≤ 2
Welds Welds > 2 in. Thick in. Thick Other
Supplement I-2110(b) I-2110(c) I-2120 I-2210 I-2400
1 — Calibration Block X X X
Material and Thickness
2 — Calibration Blocks for X X X X
Clad Welds/
Components
3 — Calibration Blocks for X X X
Curved Surfaces
4 — Alternative Calibration X X X X
Block Design
5 — Electronic Simulators X X X X
6 — Pulse Repetition Rate X X X X
7 — Instrument Calibration X X X
8 — Scan Overlap and X X
Search Unit Oscillation
9 — Scan Angles X
10 — Recording Criteria X X X X X
11 — Geometric Reflectors X X X X
12 — Flaw Sizing X X X X X
281
APPENDIX I — SUPPLEMENTS
SUPPLEMENT 1 — CALIBRATION BLOCK (b) For calibration blocks for examination surfaces
MATERIAL AND THICKNESS with diameters greater than 20 in. (508 mm), one of
the following shall be applied.
(a) The material from which the blocks are fabricated
(1) A calibration block of essentially the same
shall be one of the following:
curvature as the examination surface; or
(1) a nozzle dropout from the component;
(2) A single curved calibration block to calibrate
(2) a component prolongation; or
the examination for surfaces in the range of curvature
(3) material of the same material specification,
from 0.9 to 1.5 times the calibration block diameter; or
product form, and heat treatment condition as one of
(3) A flat calibration block may be used. When
the materials being joined.
the contact technique is used with a search unit having
(b) Where two or more base material thicknesses
a flat contact surface (i.e., does not conform to the
are involved, the calibration block thickness shall be
examination surface), the following additional require-
of a size sufficient to contain the entire examination path.
ments apply:
(a) The minimum radius to be examined shall
be determined and the search unit contact area and
frequency shall be selected so that the minimum radius
SUPPLEMENT 2 — CALIBRATION BLOCKS is greater than the critical radius as determined by
FOR CLAD WELDS OR COMPONENTS Appendix A of Article 5 of Section V.
Calibration blocks shall be clad using the same (b) For determining the maximum allowable
method (i.e., rollbonded, manual weld deposited, auto- search unit contact area for the frequency and couplant
matic wire deposited, or automatic strip deposited) as selected, Appendix A shall be applied for both straight
used to clad the component to be examined. In the beam and angle beam examinations and for convex,
event the cladding method is not known, the calibration concave, or compound curvatures.
shall be performed using a calibration block clad by (c) When rectangular search units are used, the
a manual weld deposited method. When the parent width of the search unit face tangent to the minimum
material on opposite sides of a weld are clad by radius shall be used instead of the transducer diameter
different methods, the cladding on the calibration block in Table A-10, Article 5, of Section V.
shall be applied by the method used on the side of
the weld from which the examination will be conducted.
If the examination will be conducted from both sides SUPPLEMENT 4 — ALTERNATIVE WELD
of the weld, the calibration block shall provide for CALIBRATION BLOCK DESIGN
calibration for both methods of cladding.
The alternative calibration block design of Fig. I-S4
may be used in lieu of a separate block for each weld
thickness as required by Articles 4 and 5 of Section
V provided that the following requirements are met.
SUPPLEMENT 3 — CALIBRATION BLOCKS
(a) The calibration block thickness shall equal or
FOR EXAMINATION OF PARTS WITH
exceed the maximum weld thickness to be examined.
CURVED SURFACES
(b) The calibration block material requirements shall
(a) The rules of the referenced Article or Appendix be as specified by Supplement 1 and Articles 4 and
shall be applied for selecting calibration blocks for 5 of Section V.
examination surfaces in materials with diameters 20 (c) Calibration for examinations that include the
in. and less. clad–base metal interface shall employ additional re-
282
APPENDIX I — MANDATORY Fig. I-S4
283
Supplement 4 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 10
flectors as required by Fig. I-S4. The instrument gain Section V, shall be met at the beginning and end of
setting required to establish reference levels shall be the weld examinations performed during one outage.
based upon maximum allowable planar flaws located
at the clad–base metal interface.
284
Supplement 11 APPENDIX I — MANDATORY Supplement 12
285
APPENDIX II
OWNER’S REPORT FOR
INSERVICE INSPECTIONS
287
APPENDIX II — MANDATORY Form NIS-1
289
Form NIS-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
290
APPENDIX II — MANDATORY Form NIS-1
1. The name and address of the Owner of the nuclear power plant.
2. The name and address of the nuclear power plant where the inservice examinations
and tests were performed.
3. The Owner’s designated unit identification number.
4. The Owner’s Certificate of Authorization number taken from the Certificate held
during the time of the examinations and tests covered by the Form NIS-1, if appli-
cable.
5. The date determined by the Owner that the nuclear power plant was originally
available for regular production of electricity.
6. The National Board number assigned to the unit or reactor vessel, if applicable.
7. The name of the item inspected, (e.g., reactor, steam generator, reactor coolant
pump).
8. The name of the manufacturer or installer of the item taken from the appropriate
Data Report representing the item, or from plant records when no Data Report exists
for the item.
9. The serial number assigned to the item by the manufacturer or installer, taken from
the appropriate Data Report, or from plant records when no Data Report exists for
the item.
10. The identification number assigned to the item by the State or Province of Canada
in which the item is operated.
11. The National Board number assigned to the item by the manufacturer of the item
being examined or tested, if applicable.
12. The date the examinations and tests represented by this Form were started.
13. The date the examinations and tests represented by this Form were concluded.
14. The inspection period represented by this Form as determined from Tables IWX-
2411-1 and IWX-2412-1.
15. The dates the current inspection interval commenced and is expected to conclude.
See IWA-2430.
16. The Edition and Addenda of Section XI applicable to the examinations and tests
represented by this Form.
17. Same as line 16.
18. The date and revision level of the inspection plan followed during the examinations
and tests represented by this Form.
291
Form NIS-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
19. A summary of all activities performed during the time documented by this Report,
including the status of work completed for the inspection interval. (This block will
normally refer to an attachment containing the required information.)
20. A summary of the examination and test results. (This may be included as an
attachment.)
21. A summary of corrective measures for items that did not meet the acceptance criteria
of IWX-3000. (This may be included as an attachment.)
22. The Owner’s Certificate of Authorization number provided by the Society, if appli-
cable.
23. The expiration date taken from the Owner’s Certificate of Authorization provided
by the Society, if applicable.
24. The date (month, day, year) the Form NIS-1 was signed.
25. The name of the Owner of the nuclear power plant.
26. The signature of the individual representing the Owner, who certified the accuracy
of the Form NIS-1 and its attachments.
27. The name of the jurisdiction (State or Province) where the examinations and tests
were performed.
28. The name of the Inspector’s employer, the Authorized Inspection Agency.
29. The address of the Authorized Inspection Agency (City /Town and State or Province).
30. The date the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector began activities verifying that
the examinations and tests represented by this Form NIS-1 were completed.
31. The last date the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector verified the activities
represented by this Form NIS-1.
32. The Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector’s signature.
33. The Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector’s National Board Commission Number,
including endorsements, jurisdiction name, and Certificate of Competency number
held in the State or Province where inspections represented by this Form NIS-1
were performed.
34. The date (month, day, year) the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector signed the
Form NIS-1.
292
APPENDIX II — MANDATORY Form NIS-2
293 A99
9. Remarks (23)
Applicable Manufacturer’s Data Reports to be attached
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I certify that the statements made in the report are correct and that this conforms to the requirements of
the ASME Code, Section XI.
E
Signed (27) Date , 19
Owner or Owner’s Designee, Title
PL
CERTIFICATE OF INSERVICE INSPECTION
I, the undersigned, holding a valid commission issued by the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Inspectors and the State or Province of (28) and employed by (29)
M
of (30) have inspected the components described
in this Owner’s Report during the period (31) to (32) , and state that
to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Owner has performed examinations and taken corrective measures
described in this Owner’s Report in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code, Section XI.
SA
By signing this certificate neither the Inspector nor his employer makes any warranty, expressed or implied,
concerning the examinations and corrective measures described in this Owner’s Report. Furthermore, neither
the Inspector nor his employer shall be liable in any manner for any personal injury or property damage or a
loss of any kind arising from or connected with this inspection.
Date (35) 19
294
FORM NIS-2
1. The name and address of the Owner of the nuclear power plant.
2. The date this Form was prepared.
3. The number representing this Form in relation to the number of forms comprising
attachments to the initial Form NIS-2, which will commence with sheet number
one (1).
4. The name and address of the nuclear power plant where the repair/replacement
activity was performed.
5. The Owner’s designated unit identification number.
6. A unique identification of the repair/replacement activity enabling the work to be
identified.
7. The name and address of the organization responsible for completing the repair/
replacement activity. When the organization responsible for the repair/replacement
activity holds a Certificate of Authorization, the name and address of the organization
shall be the same as shown on the Certificate of Authorization.
8. The symbol representing the Certificate of Authorization (e.g., N, NPT, NA).
9. The number from the Certificate of Authorization held by the organization responsi-
ble for completing the repair/replacement activity.
10. The expiration date of the Certificate of Authorization taken from the certificate
held by the organization responsible for completing the repair/replacement activity.
11. The unique designation of the system in the nuclear power plant, by name, including
the ASME Class of system.
12. (a) The Section of the ASME Code or other standard, (e.g., ANSI B31.1, Draft
Pump and Valve Code) that the item was manufactured in accordance with,
including the year of publication, the designation of the addenda of the standard
in effect, and any applicable Cases identified by number.
(b) The Edition and Addenda of Section XI used for the repair/replacement activity.
(c) Applicable Section XI Code Cases associated with the repair/replacement ac-
tivity.
13. The name of the item taken from the Data Report provided by the manufacturer or
from plant records when no Data Report exists for the item.
14. The name of the manufacturer of the item taken from the Data Report describing
the item. Alternatively, the name of the manufacturer or the installer of the item
taken from the plant records when no Data Report exists for the item.
15. The serial number of the item taken from the Data Report provided by the manufac-
turer or from plant records when no Data Report exists for the item.
16. The National Board Number assigned to the item by the manufacturer taken from
the Data Report or item, if applicable.
295
17. Other appropriate identification, (e.g., State or Province number, plant assigned
designator) taken from drawings or other records.
18. The year the item was manufactured, taken from the Data Report representing the
item or its nameplate as appropriate, or the date of installation taken from plant
records when no Data Report exists for the item.
19. Indicate the action taken on the item: corrected, removed, or installed.
20. Indicate if the item bears an ASME Code Symbol Stamp.
21. A brief narrative of the work performed.
22. Indicate the appropriate pressure test completed following the repair/replacement
activity, or denote exemption. Record the test pressure and temperature of the
component during the pressure test, if applicable.
23. Additional information necessary to describe the repair/replacement activity not
otherwise covered in the Form NIS-2. Manufacturer’s Data Reports for newly
installed items included in the repair/replacement activity should be identified and
attached to this Form. Describe any change to the original construction requirements.
NOTE: Manufacturer’s Data Reports for the item being removed need not be
included.
25. The type of ASME Code Symbol Stamp held by the Owner or the Owner’s designee,
if applicable.
26. The number taken from the ASME Certificate of Authorization that granted authority
to possess the ASME Code Symbol Stamp discussed in line 25, if applicable.
27. The signature of the individual and title representing the Owner who certified the
accuracy of the contents of the Form NIS-2 and its attachments, including the date
this document was signed.
28. The name of the jurisdiction (State or Province) where the repair/replacement activity
was performed.
29. The name of the Inspector’s employer, the Authorized Inspection Agency.
30. The address of the Authorized Inpsection Agency (City /Town and State or Province).
31. The date the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector began verifications that the
activities represented by this Form NIS-2 were completed.
32. The last date the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector verified the activities
represented by this Form NIS-2.
33. The Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector’s signature.
34. The Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector’s National Board Commission Number,
including endorsements, and if applicable, the jurisdiction name and Certificate of
Competency number held in the State or Province where inspections represented
by this Form NIS-2 were performed.
35. The date (month, day, year) the Authorized Nuclear Inservice Inspector signed the
Form NIS-2.
296
ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION OF
VESSELS NOT GREATER THAN 2 INCHES
IN THICKNESS
297
299
300
301
III-3100 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION the side of the block may produce a higher amplitude
signal at a longer beam path; this beam path shall not
A99 III-3110 SCREEN HEIGHT LINEARITY be used for calibration.)
The ultrasonic instrument shall provide screen height (c) For contact examination, the temperature differ-
linearity within 5% of full range for at least 80% of ence between the examination and basic calibration
the full screen height (FSH) (base line to maximum block surfaces shall not exceed 25°F (14°C).
calibrated screen points). Reject or clipping controls (d) For immersion examination, the temperature dif-
shall be set in the off or minimum position for calibration ference between the examination and calibration
and examination. couplants shall not exceed 25°F (14°C), or appropriate
compensation for angle changes shall be made.
(e) Calibration shall be performed from the surface
A99 III-3120 AMPLITUDE CONTROL (clad or unclad) of the calibration block which corres-
LINEARITY ponds to the component surface to be examined.
302
indication locations on the screen and record them on III-3300 CALIBRATION CONFIRMATION
the calibration data sheet.
(c) Sensitivity levels shall be established using the III-3310 INSTRUMENT
notch and shall be applicable to that region of the Instrument calibration for screen height and amplitude
calibrated sweep length providing complete examination control linearity shall be verified at the beginning and
of the weld and heat affected zone (HAZ). To establish end of the weld examinations performed during one
calibration, maximize the signal amplitude from the outage.
calibration position and notch that give the greatest
reflection. The response shall be set to 80% of FSH.
Without changing the gain control, determine the peak
indication amplitudes from the remaining points in the
examination region and construct a distance–amplitude
III-3320 SYSTEM CALIBRATION
correction (DAC) curve. This curve shall be the primary
CONFIRMATION
reference level.
(d) When the calibration is limited to the half-V path Complete ultrasonic examination system calibration,
due to material attenuation or examination technique establishing the DAC curve, shall be performed within
selection, sensitivity shall be established by setting the one day prior to use of the system for examination of
back surface notch at 80% of FSH; no DAC curve is those welds for which the calibration is applicable, and
required. at least once each week during the examination.
303
III-3330 SYSTEM CHECK the weld from which the examination will be conducted.
If the examination will be conducted from both sides,
A system calibration check, which is the verification
calibration reflectors shall be provided in both materials.
of the instrument sensitivity and sweep range calibration,
(c) Where the examination is to be performed from
shall be performed:
only one side of the joint, the calibration block material
(a) at the start and finish of each examination;
shall be of the same specification as the material on
(b) at intervals not to exceed 12 hr;
that side of the joint.
(c) with any change in examination personnel, except
(d) If material of the same specification is not avail-
when using mechanized equipment.
able, material of similar chemical analysis, tensile prop-
erties, and metallurgical structure may be used.
A99 III-3331 Corrective Actions (e) When the component material is clad, and the
cladding is determined to be important to the examina-
(a) If the calibration point has decreased 20% or 2 tion, the block shall be clad by the same welding
dB of its amplitude, all data sheets since the last procedure as the production part. When the automatic
calibration check shall be marked void. A new calibra- method is impractical, a manual method shall be used.
tion shall be made and recorded and the voided examina-
tion areas shall be reexamined.
(b) If the calibration point has increased more than
20% or 2 dB of its amplitude, recorded indications III-3420 SURFACE FINISH A99
taken since the last valid calibration or calibration check The finish on the surfaces of the block shall be
may be reexamined with the correct calibration and representative of the surface finish of the vessel.
their values changed on the data sheets.
(c) If the calibration point has moved on the sweep
line more than 10% of the sweep division reading, III-3430 CALIBRATION REFLECTORS A99
correct the sweep range calibration and note the correc-
tion in the examination record. If recordable reflectors Basic calibration blocks shall contain circumferential
are noted on the data sheets, those data sheets shall and longitudinal notches whose sides are perpendicular
be voided, a new calibration shall be recorded, and to the surface, at least 1.0 in. long, on the O.D. and
the examination areas shall be reexamined. I.D. surfaces. Allowable notch configurations are shown
in Fig. III-3430-1. Notch width W shall be no greater
than 1⁄4 in. Notch depth d shall be as specified in Table
III-3430-1. The reflecting surface of the notch shall be
III-3400 BASIC CALIBRATION BLOCKS
90 deg. ⫾2 deg. to the block surface. The blocks shall
A99 III-3410 MATERIAL generally conform to the design shown in Fig. III-
3230-1. Alternate block layout may be used, provided
The basic calibration blocks shall be made from
similar beam paths are utilized. Additional reflectors
material of the same wall thickness within 25% as the
may be installed; however, they shall not interfere with
component to be examined.
establishing the primary reference.
The basic calibration block shall be curved for surface
curvatures less than 20 in. diameter. A single curved
basic calibration block may be used to calibrate the
examination surfaces in the range of curvature from 0.9 III-3440 RETENTION AND CONTROL A99
to 1.5 times the basic block diameter. For examination of Basic calibration blocks shall be retained by the
welds with surface curvatures greater than 20 in. diame- Owner.
ter, a block of essentially the same curvature, or a flat
basic calibration block shall be used.
III-3500 CALIBRATION DATA RECORD A99
A99 III-3411 Material Specification
The following data shall be recorded on a calibration
(a) The calibration blocks for similar metal welds data sheet:
shall be fabricated from one of the materials being (a) calibration sheet identification and date of cali-
joined by the weld. bration;
(b) Calibration blocks for dissimilar welds shall be (b) names of examination personnel;
fabricated from the material specified for the side of (c) examination procedure number and revision;
304
NOTES:
(1) Length and arc shall be adequate to provide required angle beam calibration.
(2) All side drilled holes are optional in accordance with III-3230(d).
(3) For vessels less than 1 in. nominal wall thickness:
(a) stagger notch I.D./O.D. locations;
(b) a 1⁄2 t hole may be used in lieu of 1⁄4 t and 3⁄4 t side drilled holes.
305
306
307
308
309
310–312
313
ARTICLE IV-1000
SCOPE
IV-1100 METHODS ADDRESSED qualified in accordance with this Appendix. The organi-
zation may contract implementation of the program.
When eddy current examination is used as a surface (c) Performance demonstration requirements apply
examination method in accordance with IWA-2223, to procedures and equipment for acquisition and analysis
this Appendix provides requirements for performance and to personnel who are responsible for detecting,
demonstration of eddy current systems. sizing, and reporting of flaws.
(d) The performance demonstration requirements
specified in this Appendix apply to the acquisition
process but do not apply to personnel involved in the
acquisition process. Such personnel shall be trained
and qualified by their employer for the specific tasks
IV-1200 GENERAL they perform. The requirements for training and qualifi-
cation of such personnel shall be described in the
(a) This Appendix specifies performance demonstra- employer’s written practice (IWA-2300).
tion requirements for eddy current examination proce- (e) This performance demonstration is applicable
dures, equipment, and personnel used to detect and only to materials whose acceptance standard is 1⁄8 in.
size flaws in piping and components. This Appendix (3.2 mm) or more in length.
does not include performance demonstration require- (f) Equipment characterization described in Supple-
ments for steam generator heat exchanger tubing exami- ment 1 is optional. When Supplement 1 is selected,
nation. both the original and substitute equipment shall be
(b) Each organization (i.e., Owner, or vendor) shall characterized.
have a written program that complies with this Appen- (g) Equipment and techniques qualified in accordance
dix. Each organization that performs eddy current exami- with this Appendix may be used in procedures without
nation shall use procedures, equipment, and personnel regard to the organization that qualified the procedure.
314
ARTICLE IV-2000
GENERAL SYSTEM AND PERSONNEL
REQUIREMENTS
315
IV-2320 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IV-2320
316
ARTICLE IV-3000
QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Data sets for detection and sizing shall meet the Piping and Vessels (Surface) 2
requirements of the appropriate supplement listed in Bolting — Center Bore Hole (Surface) 3
Table IV-3110-1.
(b) The acquisition procedure, analysis procedure,
equipment and analysis personnel shall be considered
qualified upon successful completion of the performance
demonstration specified in the appropriate supplement the demonstrated ranges identified in the Data Acquisi-
listed in Table IV-3110-1. tion Procedure Specification shall be considered equiva-
(c) Once a procedure has been qualified, subsequent lent. When the procedure allows more than one value
analyst qualifications may be performed using prere- or range for an essential variable, the qualification test
corded data acquired using the qualified procedure. shall be repeated at the minimum and maximum value
for each essential variable with all other variables
remaining at their nominal values. Changing essential
variables may be accomplished during successive proce-
IV-3120 ESSENTIAL VARIABLES dure qualifications involving different personnel. Each
(a) An essential variable is a procedure, software, data analyst need not demonstrate qualification over
or hardware item that, if changed, could result in the entire range of every essential variable.
erroneous examination results. Further, any item that (c) When the procedure does not specify a range for
could decrease the signal to noise ratio to less than 2:1 essential variables and establishes criteria for selecting
shall be considered an essential variable. (Nonmandatory values, the criteria must be demonstrated.
sample Data Acquisition Procedure Specification and
Data Analysis Procedure Specification Forms are pro-
vided in supplements A and B for the purpose of IWA-3130 REQUALIFICATION
documenting the essential variables.) When a change in an acquisition technique or analysis
(b) Any two procedures with the same essential technique causes an essential variable to exceed a
variables (IV-2100 and IV-2200) are considered equiva- qualified range, the acquisition or analysis technique
lent. Equipment with essential variables that vary within shall be requalified for the revised range.
317
ARTICLE IV-4000
ESSENTIAL VARIABLE TOLERANCES
IV-4100 INSTRUMENTS AND PROBES equivalent to those qualified. When the performance
demonstration results meet the acceptance requirements
The qualified acquisition procedure may be modified
of IV-3000, the algorithm shall be considered qualified.
to replace instruments or probes of similar make, model,
and manufacturer without requalification. Other equip-
ment may be substituted, provided the performance
constraints for essential variables are met (e.g., 2:1
signal-to-noise ratio is maintained). The qualified acqui- IV-4300 CALIBRATION METHODS
sition procedure may also be modified to replace instru- Alternative calibration methods may be demonstrated
ments or probes without requalification, when the range equivalent to those described in the qualified acquisition
of essential variables defined in the Data Acquisition
procedure or analysis procedure without requalification.
Procedure Specification are met, provided the equipment
This demonstration of equivalence shall be conducted
is evaluated using Supplement 1.
as follows.
(a) Calibrate the system in accordance with the alter-
native methods.
IV-4200 COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM
(b) The alternative calibration method is acceptable
ALGORITHMS when the system complies with the essential variables
Computerized system algorithms that are altered may defined in the Data Acquisition or Data Analysis Proce-
be used when the altered algorithms are demonstrated dure Specification.
318
ARTICLE IV-5000
RECORD OF QUALIFICATION
319
APPENDIX IV — SUPPLEMENTS
320
Supplement 1 APPENDIX IV — MANDATORY Supplement 1
Sample Rate(samples/second)
Digitization Rate(samples/in.) p
Probe Speed(in./second)
321
Supplement 1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 1
three successive notches compared to a single notch expected in the bore hole. A 1.27 mm (0.050 in.) deep
of equal depth. notch of 2 mm (0.008 in.) width, and of varying length
(b) The measurement is performed for each eddy from a minimum length equal to the coil width and
current examination frequency and mode of coil opera- up to the coil width +13 mm (0.5 in.), at increments
tion, e.g., absolute or differential. A 1.27 mm (0.050 of 2.5 mm (0.1 in.) is scanned perpendicular to the
in.) deep notch of 0.2 mm (0.008 in.) width, and coil preferred direction. The gain setting is adjusted
minimum length equal to the coil width +25 mm (1.0 for an 80% scale peak signal from the signal having
in.) is scanned perpendicular to the preferred direction. the largest amplitude.
(c) A curve is plotted for the signal amplitude as a (b) When used as an essential variable, the axial
function of the probe displacement. The effective scan length coefficient shall be specified, for absolute and
field width in mm (in.) is determined by subtracting differential modes, as a maximum amplitude attenuation
the crack length from the measured distance between for each length relative to the longest one.
corresponding signal amplitude points for a given attenu-
ation below the maximum amplitude. The effective Example: ALC−2.5 mm p 0 dB
scan field width can be a negative value for one or
all of the four points measured on the curve. ALC−5.0 mm p −2 dB
(d) When used as an essential variable, the effective
scan field width shall be specified, for absolute and
differential modes, as the maximum distance to a point 3.3.1.4 Transverse Width Coefficient
on the curve used to determine the minimum value of (a) The Transverse Width Coefficient (TWC) is a
four points, equally spaced, selected to define the curve measure of the dependency of transverse crack width
on either side of the minimum and maximum signal on the amplitude of the eddy current signal. The
amplitudes. measurement is performed for each of the examination
frequencies, absolute/differential coil mode and nominal
Example: ESFW−12db p − 0.08 in. fill factors expected in the bore hole. A 1.27 mm
(0.050 in.) deep notch of the same length as the total
coil width, and 0.2 mm (0.008 in.) to 0.6 mm (0.02
3.3.1.2 Fill Factor Coefficient. The Fill Factor
in.) wide, at increments of 0.1 mm (0.004 in.), is
Coefficient (FFC) is a measure of the drop in the
scanned parallel to the coil preferred direction. The
effective magnetic field perpendicular to a tube. The
gain setting is adjusted for an 80% full scale peak
measurement is performed for each eddy current exami-
signal from the signal having the largest amplitude.
nation frequency and absolute/differential coil configu-
(b) When used as an essential variable, the transverse
ration. A 1.27 mm (0.050 in.) notch of 0.2 mm (0.008
width coefficient shall be specified, for absolute and
in.) width, and of a minimum length equal to the coil
differential modes, as a maximum amplitude attenuation
width +25 mm (1.0 in.) is scanned perpendicular to
for each defect width relative to the largest one.
the coil preferred direction.
(a) The gain setting is adjusted for an 80% full scale
peak signal for the signal having the largest amplitude. Example: TWC−0.5 mm p 0.5 dB
The measurements are performed for three or more fill
factors (ratio of square of OD probe diameter to ID TWC−0.2 mm p −1.0 dB
hole diameter) between the largest and smallest to be
encountered in bore holes.
3.3.1.5 Direct Current Saturation Strength
(b) When used as an essential variable, the fill factor
(a) The Direct Current Saturation Strength (DCSS)
shall be specified, for absolute and differential modes,
concerns only probes delivered with a supplemental
as the amplitude attenuation from the largest fill factor
coil or magnet designed to suppress the influence of
to the smallest fill factor.
possible magnetic variations. The direct current satura-
Example: FCC 0.85 to 0.70 p −5 dB
tion strength is measured in air with a gauss meter
3.3.1.3 Axial Length Coefficient located at the center of the coil at a nominal distance
(a) The Axial Length Coefficient (ALC) is a measure from the bore hole inner surface. It is expressed in
of the influence of the axial crack length on the millitesla.
amplitude of the eddy current signal. The measurement (b) When used as an essential variable, the direct
is performed for each of the examination frequencies, current saturation strength coefficient and direction shall
absolute/differential coil modes, and nominal fill factors be specified as a minimum requirement.
322
Supplement 1 APPENDIX IV — MANDATORY Supplement 2
323
Supplement 2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 3
(1) The demonstration specimen shall include one (a) Specimens shall be fabricated from materials of
crack or notch at each of the following locations: the same base material nominal composition (UNS
(a) on the weld Number) and heat treatment (e.g., solution annealed,
(b) in the heat-affected zone precipitation hardened, solution heat treated and aged)
(c) at the fusion line of the weld as those to be examined.
(d) in the base material (b) The effect of the presence of corrosion products
(2) The demonstration shall include the effects of must be evaluated if the bore hole of the bolt is not
coating thickness, when applicable. thoroughly cleaned prior to examination [IV-3120(b)].
(c) Defect Conditions
(1) The crack shall be located in the bore hole
and oriented circumferentially.
3.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (2) The length of the crack open to the surface
shall not exceed 1⁄4 in.
All flaws in each of the four identified areas must (3) The crack used for qualification may be located
be detected with a minimum 2:1 signal-to-noise ratio in a block with different geometry if the qualification
at the minimum digitization rate (for digital systems) demonstrates that cracks can be detected in the bore
or maximum scanning speed (for analog systems) per- hole. The alternative block shall be demonstrated by
mitted by the procedure. showing equivalent response in both geometries (bore
hole and block) using calibration discontinuities speci-
fied by the qualified procedure.
SUPPLEMENT 3 — QUALIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS FOR SURFACE 2.0 CONDUCT OF PERFORMANCE
EXAMINATION OF BOLTING — CENTER DEMONSTRATION
BORE HOLES
Specimen identification and crack locations shall be
1.0 SPECIMEN REQUIREMENTS obscured so as to maintain a “blind test.”
This Supplement applies only to surface examination
of the center bore hole of studs or bolts with eddy
current examination. Specimens to be used in the 3.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
qualification test for examination of the center bore Examination procedures, equipment, and personnel
hole surface shall meet the following requirements shall be considered qualified when the qualification
unless a set of test specimens is designed to accommo- crack has been detected with a minimum 2:1 signal-
date specific limitations stated in the scope of the to-noise ratio. The notch axial location shall be correctly
examination procedure. Specimens shall conform to the identified to within 6 1⁄2 in. or 5% of the bolt or stud
following requirements: length, whichever is greater.
324
APPENDIX IV — MANDATORY
1. SCOPE:
2. INSTRUMENT:
Manufacturer:
Model:
Software/Mfg./Version:
3. PROBE:
Size:
Manufacturer:
Part No.:
4. CABLES
Probe Cable Extension Cable
Type: Type:
Length: Length:
5. FREQUENCIES/MODES
Mode: Mode:
Frequencies/Channels: Frequencies/Channels:
1. 5. 1. 5.
2. 6. 2. 6.
3. 7. 3. 7.
4. 8. 4. 8.
6. CALIBRATION METHOD:
7. DATA RECORDING
Equipment Manufacturer: Model:
Media: Format:
8. DIGITIZING RATE
Samples Per Inch:
9. SCAN PATTERN
Pitch: Direction:
325
1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
1. CALIBRATION METHOD
Amplitude to Depth:
a) Frequency/Mix/Channel:
b) Frequency/Mix/Channel:
Other:
3. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Flaw Depth Threshold:
Voltage Threshold:
Signal to Noise Threshold:
Other:
4. INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer:
Software/Mfg./Version:
326
APPENDIX V
SUBMITTAL OF TECHNICAL INQUIRIES TO THE
BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL COMMITTEE
327
V-3000 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 V-6000
(b) Statement of Need. Provide a brief explanation (a) Inquiry. Provide a condensed and precise ques-
of the need for the revision(s) or addition(s). tion, omitting superfluous background information, and,
(c) Background Information. Provide background in- when possible, composed in such a way that a “yes”
formation to support the revision(s) or addition(s) in- or a “no” Reply, possibly with brief provisos, is accept-
cluding any data or changes in technology that form able. The question should be technically and editorially
the basis for the request that will allow the Committee correct.
to adequately evaluate the proposed revision(s) or addi- (b) Reply. Provide a proposed Reply that will clearly
tion(s). Sketches, tables, figures, and graphs should be and concisely answer the Inquiry question. Preferably,
submitted as appropriate. When applicable, identify any the Reply should be “yes” or “no” possibly with brief
pertinent paragraph in the Code that would be affected provisos.
by the revision(s) or addition(s) and paragraphs in the (c) Background Information. Provide any background
Code that reference the paragraphs that are to be revised information that will assist the Committee in understand-
or added. ing the proposed Inquiry and Reply.
V-6000 SUBMITTALS
V-4000 CODE CASES Submittals to and responses from the Committee
shall meet the following:
Requests for Code Cases shall provide a Statement
(a) Submittal. Inquiries from Code users shall prefera-
of Need and Background Information similar to that
bly be submitted in typewritten form; however, legible
defined in V-3000(b) and V-3000(c), respectively, for
handwritten inquiries will also be considered. They
Code revisions or additions. The proposed Code Case shall include the name, address, telephone number, and
should identify the Code Section and Division and be fax number, if available, of the inquirer and be mailed
written as a Question and Reply in the same format to the following address:
as existing Code Cases. Requests for Section XI Code
Cases should also indicate the applicable Code Edi- Secretary
tion(s) and Addenda to which the proposed Code Case ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee
applies. 345 East 47th Street
New York, NY 10017
(b) Response. The Secretary of the ASME Boiler
and Pressure Vessel Committee or of the appropriate
Subcommittee shall acknowledge receipt of each prop-
V-5000 CODE INTERPRETATIONS
erly prepared inquiry and shall provide a written re-
Requests for Code interpretations shall provide the sponse to the inquirer upon completion of the requested
following: action by the Code Committee.
328
APPENDIX VI 98
329
ARTICLE VI-1000
INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE
331
ARTICLE VI-2000
QUALIFICATION LEVELS
332
ARTICLE VI-3000
WRITTEN PRACTICE
333
ARTICLE VI-4000
QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
VI-4200 TRAINING
VI-4400 INTERUPTED SERVICE
Visual examination personnel shall successfully com-
plete the training program outlined in Supplement 1. The requirements of VII-4400 apply.
334
ARTICLE VI-5000
QUALIFICATION RECORDS
335
APPENDIX VI — SUPPLEMENTS
336
9.0 APPENDIX VI — MANDATORY 11.0
337
APPENDIX VII
QUALIFICATION OF NONDESTRUCTIVE
EXAMINATION PERSONNEL FOR
ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION
339
ARTICLE VII-1000
INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE
341
ARTICLE VII-2000
QUALIFICATION LEVELS
342
ARTICLE VII-3000
WRITTEN PRACTICE
343
VII-3500 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 VII-3500
344
ARTICLE VII-4000
QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
VII-4121 Option 1
VII-4123 Option 3
Graduate of a 4 year accredited engineering or science
High school graduate, or equivalent, plus 4 years
college or university with a degree in engineering or
experience in an assignment comparable to that of a
science, plus 2 years experience in NDE in an assign-
Level II in the ultrasonic examination method. At least
ment comparable to that of an NDE Level II in the
2 years of this experience shall be in nuclear applications
ultrasonic examination method. At least 1 year of this
and shall include the actual performance of examinations
experience shall be in nuclear applications and shall
and evaluation of examination results.
include the actual performance of examinations and
evaluation of examination results.
VII-4130 EXPERIENCE RECORDS
(a) The records maintained by the Employer to sub-
VII-4122 Option 2
stantiate experience for initial certification to each level
Completion with a passing grade of at least the shall include the activity performed, the number of hours
equivalent of 2 full years of engineering or science performing the method, and the level of certification.
study at a university, college, or technical school, plus (b) Documented experience with the current Em-
3 years experience in an assignment comparable to that ployer may be used for certification in accordance with
of a Level II in the ultrasonic examination method. At this Appendix, subject to acceptance by a Level III.
least 2 years of this experience shall be in nuclear (c) Experience during previous employment may be
applications and shall include the actual performance accepted where such experience is supported by docu-
of examinations and evaluation of examination results. mentation. The documentation may be a copy of an
345
VII-4130 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 VII-4230
346
VII-4240 APPENDIX VII — MANDATORY VII-4330
VII-4310 EXAMINATION QUESTIONS AND (a) Candidates shall demonstrate to the satisfaction
TEST SPECIMENS of a Level III that they are familiar with and can
perform the applicable UT examinations using suitable
(a) For each written examination administered as calibration blocks and written UT procedures prepared
part of the qualification examination, a “question bank” for examination of plant components.
containing at least twice the minimum number of (b) The Practical Examination shall include examina-
questions required per examination shall be available. tion of a specimen set that complies with VII-4310(b).
Qualification examinations shall be assembled from the Alternately, successful completion of a UT performance
question bank using a random selection process. The demonstration in accordance with Appendix VIII may
random selection process shall be controlled by the serve as this Practical Examination.
employer’s written practice, such that no individual (c) An assessment report containing at least ten
takes the same examination more than once. check points shall be used to evaluate the candidate’s
(b) For each Practical Examination that does not use performance using longitudinal and shear wave tech-
specimens prepared for UT performance demonstrations niques. The following check points shall be included:
(i.e., Appendix VIII) and is administered as part of (1) scanning technique;
the qualification examination, a “specimen bank” con- (2) equipment set-up and calibration;
taining at least five flaws shall be available. Grading (3) selection of search unit;
units, as defined in Appendix VIII, may be used to (4) data recording (Level I and II);
produce the specimen bank. The flaws in the specimen (5) NDE report (Level II); and
bank shall be simulated flaws not exceeding the stan- (6) evaluation in terms of the recording criteria.
dards of IWB-3500, actual flaws, or a mixture of both. (d) A description of the specimens and the calibration
The specimen or grading unit set for each Practical blocks, the procedures used, the assessment report, and
Examination shall be assembled from the specimen the examination report prepared by the candidate shall
bank using a random selection process. Blank (sound) be retained as part of the certification records.
test specimens or grading units shall be included in
the specimen set so that no more than one-third of the
specimens or grading units in the set contain flaws
VII-4330 LEVEL III QUALIFICATION
required to be detected. The specimens or grading units
EXAMINATIONS
shall be masked such that flawed and blank specimens
or grading units cannot be identified and the flaw (a) Level III Examinations shall be in accordance
locations are not visible. with IWA-2300, except that the Demonstration Exami-
347
nation shall meet VII-4323 Level II Practical Examina- VII-4350 GRADING OF EXAMINATIONS
tion rules. In addition, the Specific Examination shall
(a) A passing grade of 80% is required for each
be a written examination containing at least 30 questions.
examination. When the examinations are graded by an
Forty to 60% of the questions shall cover Section XI
outside agency, a grade of 80% shall be assigned for
UT examination, evaluation, and acceptance criteria.
those examinations the candidate passed unless actual
Necessary data such as graphs, tables, specifications,
numerical grades are provided, in which case the numeri-
procedures, and Codes shall be furnished.
cal grades shall be recorded.
(b) Level III personnel shall be recertified using the
(b) The Level I and II Practical Examinations and
written Method, Specific, and Practical Examinations
the Level III Demonstration Examinations shall be
and the Demonstration Examination. Alternatively,
graded such that failure to accurately detect, locate,
Level III personnel may be recertified using only the interpret, evaluate, or record, as applicable for the
written Method and Specific Examinations provided the examination, 80% of the known conditions in the test
following conditions are met: specimen set shall cause the candidate to fail the
(1) The Level III candidate was previously certified examination. In addition, a maximum false call rate of
or recertified using all the written examinations and 10% shall be imposed (i.e., no more than 10% of the
the Demonstration Examination. blank test specimens shall be reported as flawed).
(2) The Level III candidate is not being recertified
due to interrupted service as defined in the Employer’s
written practice. VII-4360 REEXAMINATION
(3) The Level III candidate is not being recertified
by a new Employer. (a) Those individuals failing to pass a qualification
examination must receive additional training as deter-
mined by a Level III. This determination shall be based
on the topics or subjects on which the individual failed
to attain a passing grade.
VII-4340 ADMINISTRATION OF (b) The reexamination questions shall be assembled
EXAMINATIONS by a random selection process or the examination shall
contain at least 30% different or reworded questions.
VII-4341 Level I and II General, Specific, and
The Practical or Demonstration Examination test speci-
Practical Examinations
men set shall contain at least 50% different flaws
The General, Specific, and Practical Examinations from those used during the most recent Practical or
shall be approved, administered, and graded by a Level Demonstration Examination that was not passed by the
III. The candidate shall perform the Practical Examina- candidate.
tions using procedures, techniques, and equipment com- (c) No individual shall be reexamined more than
plying with Section XI requirements on specimens not twice within any consecutive 12 month period.
used for training.
348
349
APPENDIX VII — SUPPLEMENTS
350
Supplement 1 APPENDIX VII — MANDATORY Supplement 1
351
APPENDIX VIII
PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATION FOR
ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION SYSTEMS
353
ARTICLE VIII-1000
SCOPE
355
ARTICLE VIII-2000
GENERAL EXAMINATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
356
ARTICLE VIII-3000
QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
3 4
examination procedure allows more than one value or
ip1
RMS p range for an essential variable, the qualification test
n shall be repeated at the minimum and maximum value
for each essential variable with all other variables
remaining at nominal values. Changing the essential
where variable may be accomplished during successive person-
mi p measured flaw size nel performance demonstrations. Each examiner need
ti p true flaw size not demonstrate qualification over the entire range of
n p number of flaws measured every essential variable.
357
VIII-3130 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 VIII-3140
VIII-3140 REQUALIFICATION
When a change in an examination procedure causes
an essential variable to exceed a qualified range, the
examination procedure shall be requalified for the re-
vised range.
358
ARTICLE VIII-4000
ESSENTIAL VARIABLE TOLERANCES
359
VIII-4120 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 VIII-4300
360
ARTICLE VIII-5000
RECORD OF QUALIFICATION
VIII-5100 GENERAL
The organization’s performance demonstration pro-
gram shall specify the documentation that shall be
maintained as qualification records. Documentation shall
include identification of personnel, NDE procedures,
and equipment and specimens used during qualification,
and results of the performance demonstration.
361
APPENDIX VIII — SUPPLEMENTS
362
APPENDIX VIII — MANDATORY Fig. VIII-S1-1A
363
Fig. VIII-S1-1B 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
364
APPENDIX VIII — MANDATORY Fig. VIII-S1-2A
365
Supplement 2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 2
366
Supplement 2 APPENDIX VIII — MANDATORY Supplement 4
(a) The minimum number of flaws shall be ten. if the results of the performance demonstration satisfy
(b) Flaws in length sizing sample sets shall meet the following criteria:
the requirements of para 1.2(c)(1), when given in (a) The RMS error of the flaw lengths estimated by
conjunction with a detection test. When the length ultrasonics, as compared with the true lengths, shall
sizing test is administered independently, the flaw depth not exceed 0.75 in. (19 mm);
requirements do not apply. (b) The RMS error of the flaw depths estimated by
(c) Flaws in the depth sizing sample set shall be ultrasonics, as compared with the true depths, shall not
distributed as follows: exceed 0.125 in. (3.2 mm).
Flaw Depth Minimum
(% Wall Thickness) Number of Flaws
5–30% 20% SUPPLEMENT 3 — QUALIFICATION
31–60% 20%
REQUIREMENTS FOR FERRITIC
61–100% 20%
PIPING WELDS
The remaining flaws shall be in any of the above Qualification of examination procedures, equipment,
categories. and personnel for ferritic pipe examination shall be
accomplished by satisfying the requirements of Supple-
2.0 CONDUCT OF PERFORMANCE ment 2, except that the sample material shall be ferritic
DEMONSTRATIONS and 75% of the sample set defects shall be mechanically
or thermally induced fatigue cracks. In addition, the
The specimen inside surface and identification shall set shall include pipe specimens not thicker than 0.1
be concealed from the candidate. All examinations shall in. (2.5 mm) more than the minimum thickness, nor
be completed prior to grading the results and presenting thinner than 1.0 in. (25 mm) less than the maximum
the results to the candidate. Divulgence of particular thickness for which the examination procedure is appli-
specimen results or candidate viewing of unmasked cable.
specimens after the performance demonstration is pro-
hibited.
2.1 Detection Test. Flawed and unflawed grading SUPPLEMENT 4 — QUALIFICATION
units shall be randomly mixed. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CLAD /BASE
METAL INTERFACE OF REACTOR VESSEL
2.2 Length and Depth Sizing Test
(a) For the length sizing test, the regions of each 1.0 SPECIMEN REQUIREMENTS
specimen containing a flaw to be sized shall be identified Qualification test specimens shall meet the require-
to the candidate. The candidate shall determine the ments listed herein unless a set of specimens is designed
length of the flaw in each region. to accommodate specific limitations stated in the scope
(b) For the depth sizing test, 80% of the flaws shall of the examination procedure. The same specimens
be sized at a specific location on the surface of the may be used to demonstrate both detection and sizing
specimen identified to the candidate. For the remaining qualifications.
flaws, the regions of each specimen containing a flaw
to be sized shall be identified to the candidate. The 1.1 Detection Specimens. Detection specimens,
candidate shall determine the maximum depth of the which may be full-scale mock-ups, shall conform to
flaw in each region. the following requirements.
(a) Specimens shall have sufficient volume to mini-
mize spurious reflections. Specimen length and width
3.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA shall be at least 12 in. (305 mm). There shall be at
3.1 Detection Acceptance Criteria. Examination pro- least 10 sq ft (0.9 m2) of clad surface in the specimen set.
cedures, equipment, and personnel are qualified for (b)(1) When the examination procedure requires the
detection when the results of the performance demon- examination to be performed from the vessel I.D. (clad
stration satisfy the acceptance criteria of Table VIII- surface), the specimen minimum thickness shall be 3
S2-1 for both detection and false calls. in. (76 mm) or the maximum thickness of the vessel
(whichever is less).
3.2 Sizing Acceptance Criteria. Examination proce- (2) When the examination procedure requires the
dures, equipment, and personnel are qualified for sizing examination to be performed from the vessel O.D.
367
Supplement 4 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 4
368
Supplement 4 APPENDIX VIII — MANDATORY Supplement 6
3.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA that ratio for the vessel nozzles to be examined. If
the examination procedure requires the examination be
3.1 Detection Acceptance Criteria. Examination pro-
performed from the inside surface, the specimen shall
cedures, equipment, and personnel are qualified for
have the minimum nozzle diameter covered by the
detection if the results of the performance demonstration
procedure. Each of the flaws presented for demonstration
satisfy the acceptance criteria of Table VIII-S4-1. Addi-
shall be correctly identified in accordance with Supple-
tionally, the number of false calls shall not exceed
ment 4, 2.1 with no false calls. Demonstrations on
A /10 rounded to the next whole number where A is
clad nozzle mockups may be used for examination of
the total scan area of specimens in the test measured
unclad nozzles. Demonstrations performed on unclad
in square feet.
nozzle mockups shall not be used for examinations of
3.2 Sizing Acceptance Criteria. Examination proce- clad nozzles.
dures, equipment, and personnel are qualified for sizing (b) For depth sizing, a minimum of three additional
if the results of the performance demonstration satisfy flaws as in (a) above shall be added to the test set.
the following criteria: Their depths shall be evenly distributed over the ranges
(a) no flaw is undersized for depth by more than of Supplement 4, 1.1(e)(3)(a), 1.1(e)(3)(b), and
0.2 in.; 1.1(e)(3)(c). The sizing results from these flaws shall
(b) flaw lengths estimated by ultrasonics shall be the be combined with the sizing results from Clad /Base
true length −1⁄4 in. (−6 mm), +1 in. (+25 mm); Metal Interface qualification, and combined results shall
(c) performance demonstration results reported by meet the acceptance criteria of Supplement 4, 3.2.
the candidate, when plotted on a two-dimensional plot
(Fig. VIII-S4-1) with the depth estimated by ultrasonics
plotted along the ordinate and the true depth plotted
along the abscissa, satisfy the following statistical pa- SUPPLEMENT 6 — QUALIFICATION
rameters: REQUIREMENTS FOR REACTOR VESSEL
(1) slope of the linear regression line is not less WELDS OTHER THAN CLAD /BASE METAL
than 0.7; INTERFACE
(2) the mean deviation of flaw depth is less than
0.25 in.; 1.0 SPECIMEN REQUIREMENTS
(3) correlation coefficient is not less than 0.70. Qualification test specimens shall meet the require-
ments listed herein unless a set of specimens is designed
to accommodate specific limitations stated in the scope
SUPPLEMENT 5 — QUALIFICATION of the examination procedure. The same specimens
REQUIREMENTS FOR NOZZLE INSIDE may be used to demonstrate both detection and sizing
RADIUS SECTION qualification.
Demonstration on clad /base metal interface of reactor 1.1 Detection Specimens. Detection specimens,
vessel plate specimens (Supplement 4) qualifies exami- which may be full-scale mock-ups, shall conform to
nation procedures, equipment, and personnel for nozzle the following requirements.
inside radius section examination when the following (a) Specimens shall have sufficient volume to mini-
requirements are met. mize spurious reflections. Specimen length and width
(a) For detection, a minimum of three additional shall be at least 12 in. (305 mm). There shall be
flaws at the inside radius section in one or more full- at least 10 sq ft (0.93 m) of scan surface in the
scale nozzle mock-ups (Supplement 7) shall be added specimen set.
to the test set. The specimens shall comply with Supple- (b) The specimen set shall contain at least one sample
ment 4, 1.1, but flaws may be either notches or cracks. that is at least 90% of the maximum thickness to be
Flaws shall be located in the radial axial plane of the examined. The specimen set shall contain one or more
nozzle inside radius section as shown in Fig. IWB- flaws in each of the locations and size ranges shown
2500-7. If the examination procedure requires the exami- in Table VIII-S6-1.
nation to be performed from the vessel O.D. surface, (c) When the examination procedure requires the
at least one nozzle in the specimen set shall be at examination to be performed from the vessel I.D. (clad
least 90% of the maximum thickness, tn2 in Fig. IWB- surface), the cladding on the mockup shall be of the
2500-7, to be examined and the ratio of the nozzle same type as the cladding on the component to be
thickness to shell thickness shall be within 630% of examined, with the following exceptions:
369
Supplement 6 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 6
(1) demonstration on shielded metal arc weld prior to grading and presenting the results to the
(SMAW) single-wire cladding is transferable to multi- candidate. Divulging particular specimen results or can-
ple-wire or strip-clad processes; didate viewing of unmasked specimens is prohibited.
(2) demonstration on multiple-wire or strip-clad is (b) When a flaw is reported within 1⁄2 in. (13 mm)
considered equivalent but is not transferable to SMAW- of its true location (x and y), it shall be considered
type clad. detected. All other reported flaws shall be considered
(d) The surface condition of the test specimens shall false calls.
be representative of the general condition of the vessel
scanning surface. 2.2 Length and Depth Sizing Test
(e) The detection test matrix shall include flaws with (a) For the length sizing test, the regions of each
the following description. specimen containing a flaw to be sized shall be identified
(1) Flaw Type. At least 50% of the flaws shall be to the candidate. The candidate shall determine the
cracks. The balance of flaws may be cracks, fabrication length of the flaw in each region.
defects (e.g., slag inclusions), or machined notches. (b) For the depth sizing test, 80% of the flaws shall
Machined notches shall meet the following require- be sized at a specific location on the surface of the
ments: specimen identified to the candidate. For the remaining
(a) notches shall be perpendicular to the surface flaws, the regions of each specimen containing a flaw
within 62 deg.; to be sized shall be identified to the candidate. The
(b) notches shall have a maximum width of candidate shall determine the maximum depth of the
0.010 in. and shall be plugged to their full depth with flaw in each region.
an insert of the parent material prior to cladding.
(2) No more than 10% of the flaws shall emanate
from the outer (unclad) surface. A weld direction shall
be established whether or not the specimen contains a
3.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
weld. A minimum of 40% of the flaws shall be oriented
parallel to the weld direction (within 610 deg.) and 3.1 Detection Acceptance Criteria. Examination pro-
a minimum of 40% shall be oriented perpendicular to cedures, equipment, and personnel are qualified for
the weld direction (within 610 deg.). detection if the results of the performance demonstration
(3) Flaws for the detection test matrix shall be satisfy the acceptance criteria of Table VIII-S6-2. Addi-
selected from the detection test flaws included in Table tionally, the number of false calls shall not exceed
VIII-S6-1. The flaws selected shall provide a demonstra- A /10 rounded to the next whole number where A is
tion of the minimum and maximum metal path ranges the total scan area of specimens in the test measured
to be demonstrated as well as a uniform distribution in square feet.
of flaw sizes and locations.
(4) The number of flaws in the detection test 3.2 Sizing Acceptance Criteria. Examination proce-
matrix shall be selected from Table VIII-S6-2. The dures, equipment, and personnel are qualified for sizing
rules of IWA-3000 shall be used for determining if the results of the performance demonstration satisfy
whether closely spaced flaws should be treated as the following criteria:
separate flaws. (a) no flaw is undersized for depth by more than
1.2 Sizing Specimens 0.2 in.;
(a) The sizing test matrix shall contain a minimum (b) flaw lengths estimated by ultrasonics shall be the
of ten flaws, at least half of which shall be cracks. true flaw length −1⁄4 in. (−6 mm), +1 in. (+25 mm);
(b) Sizing specimens shall conform with the require- (c) performance demonstration results reported by
ments of 1.1(b), 1.1(c), 1.1(d), and 1.1(e), except that the candidate, when plotted on a two-dimensional plot
the test matrix shall be selected from the sizing and (Fig. VIII-S4-1) with the depth estimated by ultrasonics
detection test flaws included in Table VIII-S6-1. plotted along the ordinate and the true depth plotted
along the abscissa, satisfy the following statistical pa-
rameters:
2.0 CONDUCT OF PERFORMANCE
(1) slope of the linear regression line is not less
DEMONSTRATIONS
than 0.70;
2.1 Detection Test (2) the mean deviation of flaw depth is less than
(a) Flaw locations shall be obscured so as to maintain 0.25 in.;
a “blind test.” All examinations shall be completed (3) correlation coefficient is not less than 0.70.
370
APPENDIX VIII — MANDATORY Fig. VIII-S4-1
371
Supplement 7 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 8
TABLE VIII-S6-1
DETECTION AND SIZING TEST FLAWS AND LOCATIONS
SUPPLEMENT 7 — QUALIFICATION flaws shall be combined with the sizing results from
REQUIREMENTS FOR NOZZLE-TO-VESSEL the reactor vessel weld qualification and the combined
WELD results shall meet the acceptance criteria of Supplement
6, 3.2.
Demonstration on reactor vessel plate specimens
(Supplement 6) qualifies examination procedures, equip-
ment, and personnel for nozzle-to-vessel weld examina-
tion when the following requirements are met. SUPPLEMENT 8 — QUALIFICATION
(a) For detection, a minimum of three additional REQUIREMENTS FOR BOLTS AND STUDS
flaws in one or more full-scale nozzle mock-ups shall
1.0 SPECIMEN REQUIREMENTS
be added to the test set. The specimens shall comply
with Supplement 6, 1.1, but flaws may be either notches Qualification test specimens shall meet the require-
or cracks. Flaw locations and orientations shall be ments listed herein, unless a set of specimens is designed
selected from the choices shown in Table VIII-S7-1. to accommodate specific limitations stated in the scope
At least one subsurface flaw shall be included and of the examination procedure.
there shall be no more than one flaw from each category. 1.1 Specimens shall conform to the following require-
(1) For demonstrations performed from the vessel ments.
shell, the specimen shall be at least 90% of the maximum (a) The qualification process shall be performed with
thickness to be examined. a full-scale section bolt or stud that is sufficient to
(2) For examinations performed from the bore of contain the beam path and demonstrate the scanning
the nozzle, at least one flaw parallel to the weld technique.
shall provide a metal path distance within 10% of the (b) The qualification specimen shall be of similar
equivalent path length to the weld centerline of the chemical composition, tensile properties, and metallurgi-
thickest component to be examined. cal structure as the bolt or stud to be examined. The
(3) Each of the flaws presented for demonstration scan surface of the qualification specimen shall have
shall be correctly identified, in accordance with Supple- a configuration similar to the bolt or stud to be examined.
ment 6, 2.1, with no false calls. (c) Circumferentially oriented notches shall be lo-
(b) For length sizing, a minimum of three additional cated in the qualification specimen at the minimum
flaws as in (a) above shall be added to the test set. and maximum qualified metal paths. Notches located
All flaws shall be sized to the acceptance standards of within one diameter of the end of the bolt or stud
Supplement 6. opposite the search unit are suitable for demonstrating
(c) For depth sizing, a minimum of three additional the maximum metal path distance. These notches are
flaws as in (a) above shall be added to the test set. required on the outside threaded surface and the inner
Their depths shall be evenly distributed over the ranges bore hole surface of bored studs with maximum depths
of Supplement 6, 1.1. The sizing results from these and reflective areas as specified in Table VIII-S8-1.
372
Supplement 8 APPENDIX VIII — MANDATORY Supplement 10
SUPPLEMENT 9 — QUALIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS FOR CAST AUSTENITIC
TABLE VIII-S7-1 PIPING WELDS
FLAW LOCATIONS AND ORIENTATIONS
(In the course of preparation)
Parallel to Weld Perpendicular to Weld
ID Surface X X
OD Surface X X SUPPLEMENT 10 — QUALIFICATION
Subsurface X X REQUIREMENTS FOR DISSIMILAR
METAL PIPING WELDS
1.0 SPECIMEN REQUIREMENTS
Qualification test specimens shall meet the require-
(d) Additional notches may be located within the
ments listed herein, unless a set of specimens is designed
range specified in (c) above, provided they do not
to accommodate specific limitations stated in the scope
interfere with the detection of other notches.
of the examination procedure (e.g., pipe size, weld
joint configuration, access limitations). The same speci-
2.0 CONDUCT OF PERFORMANCE mens may be used to demonstrate both detection and
DEMONSTRATIONS sizing qualification.
Specimen identification and notch locations shall be 1.1 General. The specimen set shall conform to the
obscured so as to maintain a “blind test.” A flaw shall following requirements.
be considered detected when the notch, as defined in (a) Specimens shall have sufficient volume to mini-
1.1, is found. The notch axial location correlation shall mize spurious reflections that may interfere with the
be 61⁄2 in. (613 mm) or 65% of the bolt or stud interpretation process.
length, whichever is greater. (b) The specimen set shall include the minimum and
maximum pipe diameters and thicknesses for which
the examination procedure is applicable. Pipe diameters
3.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
within a range of 0.9 to 1.5 times a nominal diameter
3.1 Examination procedures, equipment, and person- shall be considered equivalent. Pipe diameters larger
nel are qualified for detection when each qualification than 24 in. (610 mm) shall be considered to be flat.
notch (as described in 1.1) has been detected and its When a range of thicknesses is to be examined, a
response equals or exceeds the reporting criteria speci- thickness tolerance of 625% is acceptable.
373
Supplement 10 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 10
(c) The specimen set shall include examples of the 1.3 Length Sizing Specimens. The specimen set
following fabrication condition: shall include length sizing specimens that meet the
(1) geometric conditions that normally require dis- following requirements.
crimination from flaws (e.g., counterbore or weld root (a) All length sizing flaws shall be oriented circumfer-
conditions, cladding, weld buttering, remnants of previ- entially.
ous welds, adjacent welds in close proximity); (b) The minimum number of flaws shall be ten.
(2) typical limited scanning surface conditions (c) All flaw depths shall be greater than 10% of the
(e.g., diametrical shrink, single-side access due to nozzle nominal pipe wall thickness. At least 1⁄3 of the flaws,
and safe end external tapers). rounded to the next higher whole number, shall have
(d) All flaws in the specimen set shall be cracks. depths between 10% and 30% of the nominal pipe
(1) At least 50% of the cracks shall be in austenitic wall thickness. However, flaw depth shall exceed the
material. At least 50% of the cracks in austenitic nominal clad thickness when placed in cladding. At
material shall be contained wholly in weld or buttering least 1⁄3 of the flaws, rounded to the next whole number,
material. At least 10% of the cracks shall be in ferritic shall have depths greater than 30% of the nominal
material. The remainder of the cracks may be in either pipe wall thickness.
austenitic or ferritic material.
1.4 Depth Sizing Specimens. The specimen set shall
(2) At least 50% of the cracks in austenitic base
include depth sizing specimens that meet the following
material shall be either IGSCC or thermal fatigue cracks.
requirements.
At least 50% of the cracks in ferritic material shall
(a) The minimum number of flaws shall be ten.
be mechanically or thermally induced fatigue cracks.
(b) Flaws in the sample set shall not be wholly
(3) At least 50% of the cracks shall be coincident
contained within cladding and shall be distributed as
with areas described in (c) above.
follows:
Flaw Depth Minimum
1.2 Detection Specimens. The specimen set shall (% Wall Thickness) Number of Flaws
include detection specimens that meet the following 10–30% 20%
31–60% 20%
requirements. 61–100% 20%
(a) Specimens shall be divided into grading units.
Each grading unit shall include at least 3 in. (76 mm) The remaining flaws shall be in any of the above
of weld length. If a grading unit is designed to be categories.
unflawed, at least 1 in. (25 mm) of unflawed material
shall exist on either side of the grading unit. The
2.0 CONDUCT OF PERFORMANCE
segment of weld length used in one grading unit shall
DEMONSTRATION
not be used in another grading unit. Grading units need
not be uniformly spaced around the pipe specimen. The specimen inside surface and identification shall
(b) Detection sets shall be selected from Table VIII- be concealed from the candidate. All examinations shall
S2-1. The number of unflawed grading units shall be be completed prior to grading the results and presenting
at least twice the number of flawed grading units. the results to the candidate. Divulgence of particular
(c) Flawed grading units shall meet the following specimen results or candidate viewing of unmasked
criteria for flaw depth, orientation, and type. specimens after the performance demonstration is pro-
(1) All flaw depths shall be greater than 10% of hibited.
the nominal pipe wall thickness. At least 1⁄3 of the
2.1 Detection Test. Flawed and unflawed grading
flaws, rounded to the next higher whole number, shall
units shall be randomly mixed.
have depths between 10% and 30% of the nominal
pipe wall thickness. However, flaw depths shall exceed 2.2 Length Sizing Test
the nominal clad thickness when placed in cladding. (a) The length sizing test may be conducted sepa-
At least 1⁄3 of the flaws, rounded to the next whole rately or in conjunction with the detection test.
number, shall have depths greater than 30% of the (b) When the length sizing test is conducted in
nominal pipe wall thickness. conjunction with the detection test, and less than ten
(2) At least 30% and no more than 70% of the circumferential flaws are detected, additional specimens
flaws, rounded to the next higher whole number, shall shall be provided to the candidate such that at least
be oriented axially. The remainder of the flaws shall ten flaws are sized. The regions containing a flaw to
be oriented circumferentially. be sized shall be identified to the candidate. The
374
Supplement 10 APPENDIX VIII — MANDATORY Supplement 11
candidate shall determine the length of the flaw in 1.1 General. The specimen set shall conform to the
each region. following requirements.
(c) For a separate length sizing test, the regions of (a) Specimens shall have sufficient volume to mini-
each specimen containing a flaw to be sized shall be mize spurious reflections that may interfere with the
identified to the candidate. The candidate shall determine interpretation process.
the length of the flaw in each region. (b) The specimen set shall consist of at least three
specimens having different nominal pipe diameters and
2.3 Depth Sizing Test overlay thicknesses. They shall include the minimum
(a) For the depth sizing test, 80% of the flaws shall and maximum nominal pipe diameters for which the
be sized at a specific location on the surface of the examination procedure is applicable. Pipe diameters
specimen identified to the candidate. within a range of 0.9 to 1.5 times a nominal diameter
(b) For the remaining flaws, the regions of each shall be considered equivalent. If the procedure is
specimen containing a flaw to be sized shall be identified applicable to pipe diameters of 24 in. (610 mm) or
to the candidate. The candidate shall determine the larger, the specimen set must include at least one
maximum depth of the flaw in each region. specimen 24 in. (610 mm) or larger but need not
include the maximum diameter. The specimen set must
include at least one specimen with overlay thickness
within −0.1 in. to +0.25 in. (−2.5 mm to +6 mm) of
3.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA the maximum nominal overlay thickness for which the
procedure is applicable.
3.1 Detection Acceptance Criteria. Examination pro- (c) The surface condition of at least two specimens
cedures, equipment, and personnel are qualified for shall approximate the roughest surface condition for
detection when the results of the performance demon- which the examination procedure is applicable.
stration satisfy the acceptance criteria of Table VIII- (d) Flaw Conditions
S2-1 for both detection and false calls. (1) Base metal flaws. All flaws must be cracks in
or near the butt weld heat-affected zone, open to the
3.2 Sizing Acceptance Criteria inside surface, and extending at least 75% through the
(a) Examination procedures, equipment, and person- base metal wall. Flaws may extend 100% through the
nel are qualified for length sizing the RMS error of base metal and into the overlay material; in this case,
the flaw length measurements, as compared to the true intentional overlay fabrication flaws shall not interfere
flaw lengths, is less than or equal to 0.75 inch. with ultrasonic detection or characterization of the
(b) Examination procedures, equipment, and person- cracking. Specimens containing IGSCC shall be used
nel are qualified for depth sizing when the RMS error when available.
of the flaw depth measurements, as compared to the (2) Overlay fabrication flaws. At least 40% of the
true flaw depths, is less than or equal to 0.125 in. flaws shall be non-crack fabrication flaws (e.g., sidewall
(3.2 mm). lack of fusion or laminar lack of bond) in the overlay
or the pipe-to-overlay interface. At least 20% of the
flaws shall be cracks. The balance of the flaws shall
be of either type.
(e) Detection Specimens
SUPPLEMENT 11 — QUALIFICATION (1) At least 20% but less than 40% of the flaws
REQUIREMENTS FOR FULL STRUCTURAL shall be oriented within 620 deg. of the pipe axial
OVERLAID WROUGHT AUSTENITIC direction. The remainder shall be oriented circumferen-
PIPING WELDS tially. Flaws shall not be open to any surface to which
the candidate has physical or visual access. The rules
1.0 SPECIMEN REQUIREMENTS
of IWA-3300 shall be used to determine whether closely
Qualification test specimens shall meet the require- spaced flaws should be treated as single or multiple
ments listed herein, unless a set of specimens is designed flaws.
to accommodate specific limitations stated in the scope (2) Specimens shall be divided into base and over-
of the examination procedure (e.g., pipe size, weld lay grading units. Each specimen shall contain one or
joint configuration, access limitations). The same speci- both types of grading units.
mens may be used to demonstrate both detection and (a)(1) A base grading unit shall include at least
sizing qualification. 3 in. of the length of the overlaid weld. The base
375
Supplement 11 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 11
grading unit includes the outer 25% of the overlaid 2.0 CONDUCT OF PERFORMANCE
weld and base metal on both sides. The base grading DEMONSTRATIONS
unit shall not include the inner 75% of the overlaid
The specimen inside surface and identification shall
weld and base metal overlay material, or base metal-
be concealed from the candidate. All examinations shall
to-overlay interface.
be completed prior to grading the results and presenting
(2) When base metal cracking penetrates into the results to the candidate. Divulgence of particular
the overlay material, the base grading unit shall include specimen results or candidate viewing of unmasked
the overlay metal within 1 in. (25 mm) of the crack specimens after the performance demonstration is pro-
location. This portion of the overlay material shall not hibited.
be used as part of any overlay grading unit.
(3) When a base grading unit is designed to be 2.1 Detection Test. Flawed and unflawed grading
unflawed, at least 1 in. (25 mm) of unflawed overlaid units shall be randomly mixed. Although the boundaries
weld and base metal shall exist on either side of the of specific grading units shall not be revealed to the
base grading unit. The segment of weld length used candidate, the candidate shall be made aware of the
in one base grading unit shall not be used in another type or types of grading units (base or overlay) that
base grading unit. Base grading units need not be are present for each specimen.
uniformly spaced around the specimen.
(b)(1) An overlay grading unit shall include the 2.2 Length Sizing Test
overlay material and the base metal-to-overlay interface (a) The length sizing test may be conducted sepa-
of at least 6 sq in. (3871 mm2). The overlay grading rately or in conjunction with the detection test.
unit shall be rectangular, with minimum dimensions of (b) When the length sizing test is conducted in
2 in. (51 mm). conjunction with the detection test and the detected
(2) An overlay grading unit designed to be flaws do not satisfy the requirements of 1.1(f), additional
unflawed shall be surrounded by unflawed overlay specimens shall be provided to the candidate. The
material and unflawed base metal-to-overlay interface regions containing a flaw to be sized shall be identified
for at least 1 in. (25 mm) around its entire perimeter. to the candidate. The candidate shall determine the
The specific area used in one overlay grading unit shall length of the flaw in each region.
not be used in another overlay grading unit. Overlay (c) For a separate length sizing test, the regions of
grading units need not be spaced uniformly about the each specimen containing a flaw to be sized shall be
specimen. identified to the candidate. The candidate shall determine
(3) Detection sets shall be selected from Table the length of the flaw in each region.
VIII-S2-1. The minimum detection sample set is five (d) For flaws in base grading units, the candidate
flawed base grading units, ten unflawed base grading shall estimate the length of that part of the flaw that
units, five flawed overlay grading units, and ten unflawed is in the outer 25% of the base wall thickness.
overlay grading units. For each type of grading unit,
2.3 Depth Sizing Test. For the depth sizing test,
the set shall contain at least twice as many unflawed 80% of the flaws shall be sized at a specific location
as flawed grading units. on the surface of the specimen identified to the candi-
(f) Sizing Specimen date. For the remaining flaws, the regions of each
(1) The minimum number of flaws shall be ten. specimen containing a flaw to be sized shall be identified
At least 30% of the flaws shall be overlay fabrication to the candidate. The candidate shall determine the
flaws. At least 40% of the flaws shall be cracks open maximum depth of the flaw in each region.
to the inside surface.
(2) At least 20% but less than 40% of the flaws
shall be oriented axially. The remainder shall be oriented
circumferentially. Flaws shall not be open to any surface 3.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
to which the candidate has physical or visual access. 3.1 Detection Acceptance Criteria. Examination pro-
(3) Base metal cracking used for length sizing cedures, equipment, and personnel are qualified for
demonstrations shall be oriented circumferentially. detection when the results of the performance demon-
(4) Depth sizing specimen sets shall include at stration satisfy the acceptance criteria of Table VIII-
least two distinct locations where cracking in the base S2-1 for both detection and false calls. The criteria
metal extends into the overlay material by at least 0.1 shall be satisfied separately by the demonstration results
in. in the through-wall direction. for base grading units and for overlay grading units.
376
Supplement 11 APPENDIX VIII — MANDATORY Supplement 12
3.2 Sizing Acceptance Criteria. Examination proce- or, when appropriate, the same criteria for selecting
dures, equipment, and personnel are qualified for sizing values, as the examinations performed on the ferritic
when the results of the performance demonstration specimens.
satisfy the following criteria. (b) Austenitic Piping. Examinations of specimens
(a) The RMS error of the flaw length measurements, during a successful detection or length sizing demonstra-
as compared to the true flaw lengths, is less than or tion on dissimilar metal welded piping may be applied
equal to 0.75 inch (19 mm). The length of base metal toward a Supplement 2 demonstration when the follow-
cracking is measured at the 75% through-base-metal ing requirements are met.
position. (1) Grading units shall be defined as at least 6
(b) All extensions of base metal cracking into the in. (152 mm) continuous weld length. The grading unit
overlay material by at least 0.1 in. (2.5 mm) are reported shall contain only the austenitic-side base metal. The
as being intrusions into the overlay material. ferritic base metal, butt weld, and weld preparation
(c) The RMS error of the flaw depth measurements, buttering shall not be a part of the grading unit.
as compared to the true flaw depths, is less than or (2) The examinations performed on the austenitic
equal to 0.125 in. (3.2 mm). side of the dissimilar metal weld specimens shall use
the same ultrasonic procedure essential variable values,
or, when appropriate, the same criteria for selecting
SUPPLEMENT 12 — REQUIREMENTS FOR values, as the examinations performed on the austenitic
COORDINATED IMPLEMENTATION OF specimens.
SELECTED ASPECTS OF SUPPLEMENTS 2, 3,
10, AND 11
1.0 DETECTION AND LENGTH SIZING
(a) Ferritic Piping
(1) Examination personnel, equipment, and proce-
dure qualification requirements for detection and length
sizing for Supplements 2 and 3 are satisfied when the
2.0 DEPTH SIZING
following requirements are met.
(a) For detection qualification, at least three Examination personnel, equipment, and procedure
additional flawed grading units and six additional un- qualification requirements for depth sizing for more
flawed units in ferritic piping shall be added to the than one of Supplements 2, 3, 10, and 11 are met by
test set. A grading unit shall include at least 3 in. the following demonstration.
continuous weld length. All nine ferritic grading units (a) Specimens
shall be correctly identified. (1) The minimum number of flaws shall be ten.
(b) The demonstration shall meet the require- (2) The specimen set shall include at least four
ments of Supplement 2, except that for length sizing flaws from specimens specific to each of the Supple-
qualification, the minimum number of flaws shall be ments addressed by the demonstration. If Supplement
ten, and the specimen set shall include at least three, 3 is being addressed, the specimen set shall include
but not more than four, flaws in ferritic material. no more than five Supplement 3 flaws.
(2) Examinations of specimens during a successful (3) The overall flaw depth distribution shall meet
detection or length sizing demonstration on dissimilar the requirements of Supplement 2, 1.3(b).
metal welded piping may be applied toward a Supple- (4) Of the flaws specific to each of the Supplements
ment 3 demonstration when the following requirements addressed by the demonstration, no more than half,
are met. rounded to the next higher whole number, may be in
(a) Grading units shall include at least 6 in. any one of the depth categories of Supplement 2, 1.3(b).
(152 mm) continuous weld length. The grading unit (b) The demonstration shall be conducted in accord-
shall contain only the ferritic-side base metal and inside ance with the requirements of Supplement 2, 2.2(b).
surface clad. The austenitic base metal, butt weld, and (c) The examination procedure, equipment, and per-
weld preparation buttering shall not be a part of the sonnel are qualified for depth sizing under each of the
grading unit. Supplements addressed by the demonstration when the
(b) The examinations performed on the ferritic RMS error of the flaw depth measurements, as compared
side of the dissimilar metal weld specimens shall use to the true flaw depths, does not exceed 0.125 in.
the same ultrasonic procedure essential variable values, (3.2 mm).
377
Supplement 13 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Supplement 13
SUPPLEMENT 13 — REQUIREMENTS FOR (c) If near surface techniques applied from the outside
COORDINATED IMPLEMENTATION OF surface have not been demonstrated from the inside
SELECTED ASPECTS OF SUPPLEMENTS 4, surface in accordance with Supplement 4, three addi-
5, 6, AND 7 tional near-surface flaws shall be added for detection
and sizing from the outside surface.
1.0 GENERAL
(d) For detection and sizing, three additional flaws
(a) Candidates meeting the requirements of this Sup- shall be added to the test set for nozzle-to-vessel weld
plement in its entirety are considered qualified to Supple- examinations conducted from the nozzle bore.
ments 4, 5, 6, and 7. Detecting and sizing may be
performed separately.
(b) Demonstration from the inside surface of the 3.0 CONDUCT OF PERFORMANCE
vessel shall be performed first. DEMONSTRATIONS
Demonstrations on clad nozzle mock-ups may be
used to qualify the candidate for examination of unclad
2.0 SPECIMEN RULES nozzles. Demonstrations on unclad nozzle mock-ups
Specimens shall meet the following rules unless a shall not be used to qualify the candidate for examination
set of test specimens is designed to accommodate of clad nozzles.
specific limitations stated in the scope of the examination
3.1 Detection Test
procedure. The same specimens may be used to demon-
(a) Specimen identification and flaw locations shall
strate both detection and sizing qualification.
be concealed to maintain a “blind test.” All examinations
2.1 Clad /Base Metal Interface and Nozzle Inside shall be completed before grading and presenting the
Radius Section. Examinations from both the inside results to the candidate. Disclosure of specimen results
and outside surfaces of the vessel shall be qualified and viewing of unmasked specimens by the candidate
by demonstration on one combined sample set meeting are prohibited.
the rules of Supplement 4, 1.0, and the following: (b) A flaw is considered detected when it is reported
(a) For detection and sizing, a minimum of three within 1⁄2 in. (13 mm) of its true location (x and y).
additional clad /base metal interface flaws shall be added All other reported flaws shall be considered false calls.
to the test set for examination from the outside surface
3.2 Length and Depth Sizing Test
of the vessel. All three flaws shall be detected and
(a) For the length sizing test, the inside surface and
meet the sizing criteria of Supplement 4, 3.2.
specimen identification shall be concealed. The location
(b) Nozzle inside radius examinations from the out-
of each flaw shall be identified to the candidate. The
side surface of the vessel or nozzle shall be demonstrated
candidate shall determine the length of each flaw.
on an additional seven flaws for detection and ten flaws
(b) For the depth sizing test, 80% of the flaws shall
for sizing at the inside radius section in at least two
be sized at specific locations identified to the candidate.
full-scale mock-ups (Supplement 7). The mock-ups shall
The remaining flaws shall be identified to the candidate.
have different geometries (ratio of nozzle thickness to
The candidate shall determine the maximum depth of
vessel thickness) with at least two flaws each. The
each flaw.
specimens shall conform to Supplement 4, 1.1, except
that the flaws may be either notches or cracks. Flaws
shall be located in the radial axial plane of the nozzle
4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
inside radius section as shown in Fig. IWB-2500-7.
4.1 Detection Acceptance Criteria
2.2 Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds and Vessel Welds Other
than Clad /Base Metal Interface. Examinations for 4.1.1 Clad /Base Metal Interface and Nozzle
both the inside and outside surfaces of the vessel shall Inside Radius Section
be qualified by demonstration on one combined sample (a) Examination procedures, equipment, and person-
set selected from Table VIII-S6-1 and meeting the nel are qualified for detection when the results of
following: the performance demonstration satisfy the acceptance
(a) The number of flaws in the detection test set criteria of Table VIII-S4-1. Additionally, the number
shall be selected from Table VIII-S6-2. of false calls shall not exceed one-tenth of the total
(b) At least three flaws shall be contained in at least scan area of specimens in the test measured in square
one full-scale nozzle mock-up. feet, rounded to the next whole number.
378
Supplement 13 APPENDIX VIII — MANDATORY Supplement 13
(b) All clad /base metal interface flaws shall be de- (c) Performance demonstration results reported by
tected when the examination is conducted from the the candidate, when plotted on a two-dimensional plot
vessel’s outside surface. (Fig. VIII-S2-1) with the depth estimated by ultrasonics
(c) All nozzle inside radius flaws shall be detected plotted along the ordinate and the true depth plotted
with no false calls when the examination is conducted along the abscissa, satisfy the following statistical pa-
from the vessel’s outside surface. rameters:
(1) slope of the linear regression line is not less
4.1.2 Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds and Vessel Welds
than 0.7;
Other than Clad /Base Metal Interface
(2) the mean deviation of flaw depth is less than
(a) Examination procedures, equipment, and person-
0.25 in. (6 mm);
nel are qualified for detection when the results of
(3) correlation coefficient is not less than 0.70.
the performance demonstration satisfy the acceptance
criteria of Table VIII-S6-2. Additionally, the number 4.2.2 Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds and Vessel Welds
of false calls shall not exceed one-tenth of the total Other than Clad /Base Metal Interface. Examination
scan area of specimens in the test measured in square procedures, equipment, and personnel shall be consid-
feet, rounded to the next whole number. ered qualified for sizing if the results of the performance
(b) All nozzle-to-vessel flaws shall be detected when demonstration satisfy the following criteria:
the examination is conducted from the nozzle bore. (a) No flaw is undersized for depth by more than
(c) All near surface flaws shall be detected with no 0.2 in.
false calls when the examination from the outside (b) Flaw lengths estimated by ultrasonics shall be
surface is being demonstrated. the true length −1⁄4 in., +1 in. (−6 mm, +25 mm).
(c) Performance demonstration results reported by
4.2 Sizing Acceptance Criteria
the candidate, when plotted on a two-dimensional plot
4.2.1 Clad /Base Metal Interface and Nozzle (Fig. VIII-S2-1) with the depth estimated by ultrasonics
Inside Radius Section. Examination procedures, equip- plotted along the ordinate and the true depth plotted
ment, and personnel are qualified for sizing when the along the abscissa, satisfy the following statistical pa-
results of the performance demonstration satisfy the rameters:
following: (1) slope of the linear regression line is not less
(a) No flaw is undersized for depth by more than than 0.7;
0.2 in. (2) the mean deviation of flaw depth is less than
(b) Flaw lengths estimated by ultrasonics shall be 0.25 in.;
the true length −1⁄4 in., +1 in. (−6 mm, +25 mm). (3) correlation coefficient is not less than 0.70.
379
APPENDIX IX
MECHANICAL CLAMPING DEVICES FOR CLASS 2
AND 3 PIPING PRESSURE BOUNDARY
381
ARTICLE IX-1000
GENERAL
(a) Mechanical clamping devices used as piping pres- (4) piping larger than NPS 6 (DN150).
sure boundary may remain in service only until the (d) A Repair/Replacement plan shall be developed
next refueling outage, at which time the defect shall in accordance with IWA-4150, and shall identify the
be removed or reduced to an acceptable size. defect characterization method, design requirements,
(b) These clamping devices may be used on piping and monitoring requirements.
and tubing, and their associated fittings and flanges, (e) Welding performed as part of the fabrication and
and the welding ends of pumps, valves, and pressure installation of the clamping device shall be in accordance
vessels, except as prohibited by (c) below. with the requirements of IWA-4400. Welding shall be
(c) Clamping devices shall not be used on the fol- documented on an NIS-2 Form.
lowing: (f) The records required by IWA-4180 and the Re-
(1) Class 1 piping;
pair/Replacement plan shall be maintained by the Owner
(2) portions of a piping system that forms the
until the clamping device is removed.
containment boundary;
(3) piping larger than NPS 2 (DN50) when the
nominal operating temperature or pressure exceeds
200°F (93°C) or 275 psig (1900 kPa);
383
ARTICLE IX-2000
DEFECT CHARACTERIZATION
384
ARTICLE IX-3000
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
385
IX-3300 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 IX-3300
386
ARTICLE IX-4000
MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
387
ARTICLE IX-5000
PRESSURE TESTING REQUIREMENTS
388
ARTICLE IX-6000
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
The Owner shall prepare a plan for monitoring defect be specified in the Repair/Replacement Plan. When the
growth in the area immediately adjacent to the clamping examination reveals defect growth to a size that exceeds
device. The plan shall include the following activities the projected size determined by IX-3100(b), the defect
and requirements. shall be removed or reduced to an acceptable size.
(a) Except as permitted by (b) below, or where (b) Monitoring of the defect size need not be per-
precluded by the clamping device configuration, the formed for a circumferential crack.
area immediately adjacent to the clamping device shall (c) The clamping device shall be monitored for
be examined using a volumetric method. The examina- leakage at least weekly. Any leakage at any time shall
tion frequency shall not exceed three months, and shall be dispositioned.
389
NONMANDATORY APPENDICES A99
391
392
393
H-6000 Allowable Flaw Depths for Flawed Pipe Meeting the EPFM Criteria . . . . . . . . . 490
H-6100 Scope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490
H-6200 Evaluation Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490
H-6300 Circumferential Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490
394
H-7000 Allowable Flaw Depths for Flawed Pipe Meeting the LEFM Criteria . . . . . . . . . 494
H-7100 Scope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494
H-7200 Evaluation Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494
H-7300 Circumferential Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494
H-7400 Axial Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 495
395
K-4100 Scope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513
K-4200 Evaluation Procedure for the Applied J-Integral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513
K-4210 Calculation of the Applied J-Integral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513
K-4220 Evaluation Using Criterion for Flaw Extension of 0.1 in. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514
K-4300 Evaluation Procedures for Flaw Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514
K-4310 J-R Curve — Crack Driving Force Diagram Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514
K-4320 Failure Assessment Diagram Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 515
K-4321 Failure Assessment Diagram Curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 515
K-4322 Failure Assessment Point Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 515
K-4323 Evaluation Using Criterion for Flaw Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516
K-4330 J-Integral /Tearing Modulus Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516
K-4331 J-Integral at Flaw Instability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516
K-4332 Internal Pressure at Flaw Instability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518
K-4333 Evaluation Using Criteria for Flaw Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518
396
L-3320 Evaluation Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Ferritic Steel Components Less
Than 4 in. Thick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526
L-3330 Evaluation Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Austenitic Piping . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526
L-3331 Evaluation Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526
L-3332 Acceptance Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526
L-3340 Evaluation Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Ferritic Piping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526
L-3341 Evaluation Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 526
L-3342 Acceptance Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527
L-3400 Examination Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527
L-3410 Examinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527
L-3420 Successive Examinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527
L-3430 Personnel Qualifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527
Figures
A-3200-1 Linearized Representation of Stresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 407
A-3300-1 Elliptical Flaw Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408
A-3310-1 Membrane Stress Correction Factor for Subsurface Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409
A-3310-2 Bending Stress Correction Factor for Subsurface Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410
A-4200-1 Lower Bound KIa and KIc Test Data for SA-533 Grade B Class 1, SA-508 Class
2, and SA-508 Class 3 Steels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 415
A-4300-1 Reference Fatigue Crack Growth Curves for Carbon and Low Alloy Ferritic
Steels Exposed to Air Environments (Subsurface Flaws) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416
A-4300-2 Reference Fatigue Crack Growth Curves for Carbon and Low Alloy Ferritic
Steels Exposed to Water Environments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417
A-5300-1 Determination of Critical Flaw Sizes for Postulated Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 420
C-2200-1 Flaw Characterization — Circumferential Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 431
C-2200-2 Flaw Characterization — Axial Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 431
C-2400-1 Flaw Characterization — Skewed Axial Flaws Projected Into
Axial Plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 432
397
C-2400-2 Flaw Characterization — Skewed Circumferential Flaws Projected Into
Circumferential Plane. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433
C-2400-3 Flaw Characterization — Compound Skewed Flaw Projected Into Circumferential
and Axial Planes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 434
C-3210-1 Reference Fatigue Crack Growth Curves for Austenitic Stainless Steels in Air
Environments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436
C-3320-1 Cross Section of Flawed Pipe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 438
D-2000-1 Flat-Top Ground Weld Crown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445
D-2000-2 Smoothly Ground Weld Crown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445
G-2210-1 ........................................................................... 463
G-2214-1 ........................................................................... 465
G-2214-2 ........................................................................... 466
H-2200-1 Flaw Characterization — Circumferential Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476
H-2200-2 Flaw Characterization — Axial Flaws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476
H-2400-1 Flaw Characterization — Skewed Axial Flaws Projected Into Axial Plane . . . . . . . . 477
H-2400-2 Flaw Characterization — Skewed Circumferential Flaws Projected Into
Circumferential Plane. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478
H-2400-3 Flaw Characterization — Compound Skewed Flaw Projected Into Circumferential
and Axial Planes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479
H-4200-1 Flow Chart for Screening Criteria to Establish the Analysis Method . . . . . . . . . . . . 482
H-4221-1 Circumferential Flaw Geometry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483
H-4221-2 Axial Flaw Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483
H-5200-1 Flow Chart for Materials Meeting the Load Limit Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486
H-6200-1 Flow Chart for Materials for Which Ductile Flaw Extension May Occur Prior to
Limit Load. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491
H-7200-1 Flow Chart for Materials Meeting the Linear Elastic Fracture Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . 494
J-1000-1 Decision Tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
K-4310-1 Comparison of the Slopes of the Applied J-Integral Curve and the J-R Curve . . . . 514
K-4320-1 Failure Assessment Diagram for the One-Quarter Wall Thickness Flaw . . . . . . . . . . . 515
K-4330-1 Illustration of the J-Integral /Tearing Modulus Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517
Tables
A-3320-1 Coefficients G0 through G3 for Surface Crack at Point 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411
A-3320-2 Coefficients G0 through G3 for Surface Crack at Point 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412
E-1 Maximum Allowable Pressure as a Function of Tc−RTNDT for Isothermal Pressure
Transients (DTc /Dt <10°F /hr) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449
E-2 Evaluation Input for Plant and Event Specific Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics
Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450
H-4211-1 Material Properties for Carbon Steel Base Metals and Weldments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481
H-4212-1 Material Properties for Carbon Steel Base Metals and Weldments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483
H-5310-1 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth-to-Thickness Ratio for
Circumferential Flaws, Normal Operating (Including Upset and Test) Conditions
(Limit Load Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487
H-5310-2 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth-to-Thickness Ratio for
Circumferential Flaws, Emergency and Faulted Conditions (Limit Load
Analysis). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487
H-5410-1 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth-to-Thickness Ratio for Axial
Flaws, Normal Operating (Including Upset and Test) Conditions (Limit Load
Analysis). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489
H-5410-2 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth-to-Thickness Ratio for Axial
Flaws, Emergency and Faulted Conditions (Limit Load Analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489
H-6310-1 Load Multipliers for Carbon Steel Base Metals and Weldments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 490
398
H-6310-2 Load Multipliers for Carbon Steel Base Metals and Weldments for User-Specified
Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 492
H-6410-1 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth-to-Thickness Ratio for Axial
Flaws, Normal (Including Upset and Test) Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493
H-6410-2 Allowable End-of-Evaluation Period Flaw Depth-to-Thickness Ratio for Axial
Flaws, (Emergency and Faulted Conditions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493
K-4320-1 Coordinates of the Failure Assessment Diagram Curve of Fig. K-4320-1 . . . . . . . . . 516
L-3210-1 Postulated Surface Flaw Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 525
L-3420-1 Successive Inspection Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 527
399
APPENDIX A
ANALYSIS OF FLAWS
401
ARTICLE A-1000
INTRODUCTION
403
ARTICLE A-2000
FLAW MODEL FOR ANALYSIS
404
ARTICLE A-3000
METHOD FOR KI DETERMINATION
A-3200 STRESSES
A-3300 STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR
(a) For a surface or a subsurface flaw, the stresses EQUATIONS
at the flaw location shall be resolved into membrane
and bending stresses. Residual stresses and applied The detected flaw shall be represented by an ellipse
stresses from all forms of loading, including pressure or a semiellipse as illustrated in Fig. A-3300-1. The
stresses and cladding-induced stresses, shall be consid- stress intensity factors for the flaw model shall be
ered. For nonlinear stress variations through the wall, determined using the stresses and flaw geometry de-
the actual stress distribution may be approximated by scribed in A-3310 for subsurface flaws or A-3320 for
a linear distribution that accurately represents or bounds surface flaws.
the stress field over the flaw depth. An example of
linearization of a concave upward stress field is illus-
trated in Fig. A-3200-1. The linearized stress distribution A-3310 SUBSURFACE FLAW EQUATIONS
may then be characterized by the membrane stress, sm, Stress intensity factors for subsurface flaws shall be
and the bending stress, sb, as shown in Fig. A-3200-1. calculated using the membrane and bending stresses at
(b) For a surface flaw, the stresses normal to the the flaw location by the following equation.1
plane of the flaw at the flaw location may be represented
by a polynomial fit over the flaw depth by the following KI p [sm Mm + sb Mb]√ p a /Q (2)
relationship:
where
2 3
405
A-3310 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 A-3320
406
APPENDIX A — NONMANDATORY Fig. A-3200-1
407
Fig. A-3300-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
408
APPENDIX A — NONMANDATORY Fig. A-3310-1
409
Fig. A-3310-2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
410
APPENDIX A — NONMANDATORY Table A-3320-1
TABLE A-3320-1
COEFFICIENTS G0 THROUGH G3 FOR SURFACE CRACK AT POINT 1
411
Table A-3320-2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
TABLE A-3320-2
COEFFICIENTS G0 THROUGH G3 FOR SURFACE CRACK AT POINT 2
412
ARTICLE A-4000
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
A-4100 SCOPE where KIc and KIa are in units of ksi√ in. and T and
RTNDT are in units of °F.
This Article provides the rules and equations for
determining the material properties that are utilized in
the analyses.
A-4300 FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH
RATE
A-4200 FRACTURE TOUGHNESS
(a) The fatigue crack growth rate da /dN of the
(a) The fracture toughness of the material is deter- material is characterized in terms of the range of applied
mined by two properties KIa and KIc, which represent stress intensity factor DKI. This characterization is
critical values of the stress intensity factor KI. KIa is generally of the form:
based on the lower bound of crack arrest critical KI
values measured as a function of temperature. KIc is
based on the lower bound of static initiation critical da / dN p Co (DKI )n (1)
KI values measured as a function of temperature. The
KIa and KIc values used in the analysis should represent where
conservative values obtained preferably from the specific np the slope of the log (da /dN) versus log (D KI)
material and product form involved. The values so used Cop a scaling constant
should be justified on the basis of current technology and
should take into account material variability, testing Data should be obtained from specimens of the actual
techniques, and any other variables which may lower material and product form, considering material variabil-
these toughness values. ity, environment, test frequency, and other variables
(b) Lower bound KIa and KIc versus temperature that affect the data.
curves from tests of SA-533 Grade B Class 1, SA- (b) The fatigue crack growth behavior of the material
508 Class 2, and SA-508 Class 3 steel are provided is affected by the R ratio (Kmin /Kmax) and the environ-
in Fig. A-4200-1 for use if data from the actual product ment. Reference fatigue crack growth rates for carbon
form are not available. The temperature scale of this and low alloy ferritic steels for both air and light-
data should be related to the reference nil-ductility water reactor environments are given below.
temperature RTNDT , as determined for the material prior (1) Reference fatigue crack growth behavior of
to irradiation, according to the rules of NB-2331. The the material exposed to air environments (subsurface
curves in Fig. A-4200-1 are intended to be very conser- flaws) is given by Eq. (1) with n p 3.07 and
vative since the recommended procedure is to determine
the material fracture toughness from specimens of the
Co p 1.99 × 10−10S (2)
actual material and product form in question. Analytical
approximations for these curves are as follows:
S is a scaling parameter to account for the R ratio
KIc p 33.2 + 20.734 exp[0.02 (T − RTNDT)] and is given by S p 25.72 (2.88 − R)−3.07, where 0
≤ R ≤ 1 and DKI p Kmax − Kmin. For R < 0, DKI
depends on the crack depth, a, and the flow stress, sf.
KIa p 26.8 + 12.445 exp[0.0145 (T − RTNDT)] The flow stress is defined by sf p 1⁄2(sys + sult),
413
A-4300 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 A-4400
where sys is the yield strength and sult is the ultimate A-4400 IRRADIATION EFFECTS
tensile strength. For −2 ≤ R ≤ 0 and Kmax − Kmin ≤
(a) For materials that are subjected to fast neutron
1.12 sf √ pa, S p 1 and DKI p Kmax. For R < −2 fluence, the degradation of the material fracture tough-
and Kmax − Kmin ≤ 1.12 sf √ pa, S p 1 and DKI p ness due to irradiation must be accounted for. The
(1 − R) Kmax/3. For R < 0 and Kmax − Kmin > 1.12 degree of degradation depends upon the neutron fluence,
sf √ pa, S p 1 and DK p Kmax − Kmin. the irradiation temperature, and the relative sensitivity
The scaling constant Co from Eq. (2) produces fatigue of the particular steel. Radiation induced changes in
crack growth rates in units of in. /cycle where DKI is fracture toughness should be determined from surveil-
in units of ksi√ in. and is intended for use when data lance specimens of the actual material and product
form, irradiated according to the surveillance techniques
from the actual product form are not available. Reference
of ASTM E 185, Standard Practice for Conducting
fatigue crack growth rate curves given by Eqs. (1) and
Surveillance Test for Light-Water Cooled Nuclear
(2) are provided in Fig. A-4300-1.
Power Reactor Vessels.
(2) Reference fatigue crack growth behavior of
material exposed to light-water reactor environments is
given by Eq. (1) using DKI p Kmax − Kmin. If Kmin
is equal to or less than zero, use R p 0. Co and n (b) Where surveillance data are not available, the
are given by whichever of the following results in the effects of neutron irradiation should be considered
higher fatigue crack growth rate, da /dN: (1) n and Co for both KIa and KIc by shifting the reference
in A-4300(b)(1) for air environments, or (2) either of nil-ductility temperature RTNDT as a function of irradi-
the following, as applicable. ation.
414
APPENDIX A — NONMANDATORY Fig. A-4200-1
FIG. A-4200-1 LOWER BOUND KIa AND KIc TEST DATA FOR SA-533 GRADE B CLASS 1, SA-508 CLASS 2,
AND SA-508 CLASS 3 STEELS
415
Fig. A-4300-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
FIG. A-4300-1 REFERENCE FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH CURVES FOR CARBON AND LOW ALLOY FERRITIC
STEELS EXPOSED TO AIR ENVIRONMENTS (SUBSURFACE FLAWS)
416
APPENDIX A — NONMANDATORY Fig. A-4300-2
FIG. A-4300-2 REFERENCE FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH CURVES FOR CARBON AND LOW ALLOY FERRITIC
STEELS EXPOSED TO WATER ENVIRONMENTS
417
ARTICLE A-5000
ANALYSIS
418
A-5400 APPENDIX A — NONMANDATORY A-5400
(b) The minimum critical flaw size for emergency (5) The flaw penetration at which the calculated
and faulted conditions ai should be established using stress intensity factor exceeds the KIc profile corresponds
KIc data for flaw initiation considerations and KIa data to the critical flaw size for initiation ai , and the
for flaw arrest considerations. Each postulated incident penetration at which the stress intensity factor goes
should be considered for critical flaw size as follows. below the KIa curve corresponds to the critical flaw
(1) Determine the maximum end-of-period irradia- size for arrest aa. This comparison is illustrated in Fig.
tion profile through the thickness of the component at A-5300-1 for both an arrest and a nonarrest situation.
the observed flaw location. (6) Curves such as in Fig. A-5300-1 should be
(2) Determine temperature and stress profiles prepared for a number of selected times following each
through the thickness of the component at the observed postulated accident to establish the critical time.
flaw location as a function of time following the (7) For those transients where KI is monotonically
postulated incident. decreasing with time (e.g., where system repressuriza-
(3) Using the irradiated fracture toughness data, tion is limited), warm prestressing may be credited to
determine the flaw arrest KIa and flaw initiation KIc preclude flaw initiation or reinitiation at times in the
fracture toughness profiles through the thickness of the transient beyond the time of the peak stress intensity
component as a function of time following the postulated factor.
incident. (c) The smallest value of ai determined by the above
(4) Calculate stress intensity factors (using the procedure (and for which the flaw arrest penetration p
methods outlined in A-3000 or some other documented is greater than 0.75) after all postulated accidents
procedure) for various penetration depths of an assumed have been considered represents the minimum critical
flaw, geometrically similar to the ellipse or semiellipse initiation flaw size for emergency and faulted conditions
defined by the shape af /øf. at the location of the observed flaw.
419
Fig. A-5300-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
420
ARTICLE A-9000
GLOSSARY
bending stress correction factor (Mb) — a factor used flaw acceptance standards — specified values of flaw
in the stress intensity factor equation derived from length, depth, depth-to-component thickness ratio, or
relationships between flaw eccentricity ratio, ratio of areas as specified in IWA-3100
flaw depth to wall thickness, and flaw depth to wall flaw characterization — the process of circumscribing
thickness as a function of flaw depth to length ratios a flaw in a rectangle parallel to the component surface
(Figs. A-3300-4 and A-3300-5) or in the plane of the wall perpendicular to the compo-
clad or cladding — a layer, usually an austenitic alloy, nent surface for comparison with flaw acceptance stan-
on the surface of a component to minimize corrosion dards
flaw eccentricity (e) — the distance of the center line
coplanar flaws — two or more flaws which are oriented
of a flaw from the neutral axis, usually the center line
in the through-wall direction of a component lying in
of the wall of a component
the same plane. The flaws may be defined as surface
or subsurface, continuous or discontinuous, depending flaw eccentricity ratio (2e/t) — the ratio of twice the
on their proximity. (See Fig. IWA-3380-1.) flaw eccentricity to the component wall thickness
crack initiation — the onset of flaw extension due to flaw evaluation — the analytical process based on
an increase in component loading fracture mechanics used to determine whether a compo-
nent is or is not acceptable for continued service when
crack penetration (P) — the ratio of crack depth to it contains a flaw exceeding the specified acceptance
component thickness — 2a/t for subsurface flaws and standards
a/t for surface flaws
flaw length — the length (ø) of the rectangle circum-
cumulative fatigue crack growth — the total incremental scribing the flaw when drawn parallel to the surface
growth of a flaw over a period of time determined of the component
through use of the design transients flaw location — the site of a flaw in the wall of a
discontinuity stress — the stress distribution through component
a component wall resulting from gross structural discon- flaw major axis (ø or c) — the long dimension (length)
tinuities such as head-to-shell junctions where net bend- of a flaw
ing and membrane forces are produced
flaw minor axis (a, 2a) — the short dimension (depth)
end-of-life irradiation — the predicted fluence at the of a flaw
end of component life flaw orientation — the position of the plane of the
end-of-period flaw size — the maximum size (depth, flaw with respect to the plane perpendicular to the
af, and length, øf) to which a detected flaw is calculated maximum principal stress direction. For purpose of
to grow in a specified time period, such as the next analysis, the flaw plane is projected onto the perpendicu-
scheduled examination of the component or until end lar plane.
of component life flaw shape factor — the relationship between flaw
fatigue crack growth rate (da/dN) — the rate of flaw aspect ratio (a/ø) and the stress ratio [(sm + sb)/sy]
growth due to fatigue in terms of the range of the providing values of the flaw shape parameter (Q)
applied stress intensity factor flaw shape parameter (Q) — a value obtained from
flaw acceptance criteria — the equations or bases for the flaw shape factor and stress ratio
acceptance by fracture mechanics evaluations of flaws irradiation effect — the change in material properties
of a size exceeding the flaw acceptance standards due to neutron fluence
421
A-9000 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 A-9000
linear elastic fracture mechanics — the analytical proce- normal stress — the component of stress normal to
dure that relates the stress-field magnitude and distribu- the plane of reference, also referred to as direct stress
tion in the vicinity of a crack tip, resulting from the primary stress — any normal stress or shear stress
nominal stress applied to the structure, to the size of developed by an imposed loading that is necessary to
a crack that would cause nonductile failure. satisfy the laws of equilibrium of external and internal
membrane stress correction factor (Mm) — a factor used forces and moments
in the stress intensity equation derived from relationships R ratio (Kmin /Kmax) — the algebraic ratio of calculated
between flaw eccentricity ratio, ratio of flaw depth to stress intensity factor (minimum and maximum) in a
wall thickness, and flaw depth to wall thickness as a stress cycle
function of flaw depth to length ratios. (See Figs. A- residual stress — remaining tensile or compressive
3300-2 and A-3300-3.) stresses within a material under unloaded conditions
nonlinear stress distribution — the curvilinear stress secondary stress — the normal or shear stress developed
distribution across a component wall, resulting from the by the constraint of adjacent material or by self-
algebraic addition of stresses (e.g., bending, membrane, constraint of the structure. The basic characteristic of
residual). (See Fig. A-3200-1.) a secondary stress is that it is self-limiting.
422
APPENDIX B
FORMS
423
APPENDIX B — NONMANDATORY Form NIS-BA
425
Form NIS-BB 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
426
APPENDIX C
EVALUATION OF FLAWS IN AUSTENITIC
PIPING
427
ARTICLE C-1000
INTRODUCTION
429
ARTICLE C-2000
FLAW MODEL FOR ANALYSIS
430
Fig. C-2200-1 APPENDIX C — MANDATORY Fig. C-2200-2
431
Fig. C-2400-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
FIG. C-2400-1 FLAW CHARACTERIZATION — SKEWED AXIAL FLAWS PROJECTED INTO AXIAL PLANE
432
APPENDIX C — MANDATORY Fig. C-2400-2
433
Fig. C-2400-3 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
434
ARTICLE C-3000
ANALYSIS
C-3100 SCOPE test frequency, mean stress, and other variables that
affect the data should be considered.
This Article provides the methodology for flaw evalu-
(b) The fatigue crack growth behavior of austenitic
ation and describes the procedures to determine the
stainless steels is affected by temperature, R ratio
flaw size at the end of the evaluation period.
(Kmin /Kmax), and environment. Reference fatigue crack
growth rates for air and water environments are given
by the following.
C-3200 FLAW GROWTH ANALYSIS (1) Reference fatigue crack growth behavior of
cast and wrought austenitic stainless steels and their
(a) Having characterized the flaw in terms of an welds exposed to air environments (subsurface flaws)
equivalent axial and circumferential flaw, it is necessary are given by Eq. (1) with n p 3.3 and
to determine the maximum depth af and the maximum
length øf to which the detected flaw will grow by the
Co p C ( S ) (2)
end of the evaluation period. This Article describes
the procedures for the flaw growth analysis.
(b) Crack growth in austenitic piping can be due to where C is a scaling parameter to account for tempera-
cyclic fatigue flaw growth, SCC under sustained load, ture and is given by
or a combination of both. Flaw growth analysis should −4 T − 1.13 × 10−6 T 2 + 1.02 × 10−9 T 3]
be performed for normal operating conditions as defined C p 10 [−10.009 + 8.12 × 10
in A-5200 of Appendix A. Flaw growth is governed
by the applied stress intensity factor. The procedures where T is themetal temperature in °F (T ≤ 800°F). S
described in A-3000 can be used to calculate the stress is a scaling parameter to account for R ratio and is
intensity factor. given by
S p 1.0 when R ≤ 0
C-3210 FLAW GROWTH DUE TO
p 1.0 + 1.8R when 0 < R ≤ 0.79
FATIGUE
(a) Fatigue flaw growth rate in austenitic piping can p − 43.35 + 57.97R when 0.79 < R < 1.0
be characterized in terms of the range of the applied
stress intensity factor, KI. This characterization is of The scaling constant Co from Eq. (2) produces fatigue
the form: crack growth rates in the units of inches /cycle when
DK is in the units of ksi√ in. and is intended for use
da when data from actual product form is not available.
p Co (DKI )n (1)
dN Reference fatigue crack growth rate curves using Eqs.
(1) and (2) are provided in Fig. C-3210-1.
where n and Co are constants dependent on the material (2) Reference fatigue crack growth rates for austen-
and environmental conditions. These parameters should itic stainless steels exposed to water environments are
be based on flaw growth data obtained from specimens in the course of preparation.
of the same material specification and product form, (c) In order to determine the maximum potential for
or suitable alternative. Material variability, environment, fatigue flaw growth of the detected flaw during normal
435
Fig. C-3210-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
436
C-3210 APPENDIX C — NONMANDATORY C-3310
operating conditions, a cumulative fatigue flaw growth C-3230 FLAW GROWTH DUE TO A
study of the piping should be performed. The design COMBINATION OF FATIGUE AND
transients prescribed in the system Design Specification SCC
that apply during the evaluation period should be in-
When the service loading and the material and envi-
cluded. Each transient should be considered in approxi-
ronmental conditions are such that the flaw is subjected
mate chronological order as follows.
to both fatigue and SCC growth, the final flaw size af
(1) Determine DKI , the maximum range of KI
and øf are obtained by adding the increments in flaw
fluctuation associated with the transient.
size due to fatigue and SCC computed in accordance
(2) Find the incremental flaw growth corresponding
with the procedures described above. The cyclic and
to DKI from the fatigue flaw growth rate data.
sustained loads should be considered in approximately
(3) Update the flaw size and proceed to the next
chronological order.
transient.
(d) The above procedure, after all transients have
been considered, yields the final flaw size af and øf at
the end of the evaluation period considering fatigue C-3300 CIRCUMFERENTIAL FLAW
flaw growth alone. EVALUATION
The allowable end-of-evaluation period flaw sizes
for circumferential flaws are provided in Tables IWB-
3641-1 and IWB-3641-2. The allowable flaw sizes
specified in these tables are dependent on the applied
C-3220 FLAW GROWTH DUE TO STRESS stress level and the local piping material.
CORROSION CRACKING
(a) Flaw growth due to SCC is a function of the
material condition, environment, the stress intensity
C-3310 EVALUATION PARAMETERS
factor due to sustained loading, and the total time that
the flaw is exposed to the environment under sustained The applied stress levels to be used to determine
loading. The procedure for computing SCC flaw growth the allowable flaw sizes are the stresses defined in the
is based on experimental data relating the flaw growth ASME Code Piping Stress Reports. For example, for
rate (da /dt) to the sustained load stress intensity factor normal operating conditions, the value of Pm + Pb
KI. Sustained loads resulting from pressure and steady corresponds to the primary stress intensity value speci-
state thermal stresses as well as weld residual stresses fied on the left-hand side of Eq. (9) in NB-3652 and
should be included. Appropriate experimental data on the value of Pe corresponds to the thermal expansion
residual stress distribution for different pipe sizes and stress (bending or membrane or both, but without
flaw growth rate as a function of sustained KI should geometric stress concentrations) including the effects
be used. The procedure employed for determining the of weld shrinkage from a weld overlay repair. The
cumulative flaw growth is as follows. allowable design stress intensity Sm should be deter-
(1) Determine sustained stress intensity factor KI mined from Table I-1.0 of Section III, Division 1 or
for a given steady stress state condition. obtained from the Stress Report. The multiplier Z, when
(2) Find the incremental growth of the flaw depth applicable, is determined from Table IWB-3641-1 or
and length corresponding to the period for which the IWB-3641-2. With these parameters, for normal op-
steady state stress is applied. This can be obtained erating conditions the allowable flaw depth an corres-
from the relationship between da /dt and KI. A suffi- ponding to the flaw length øf should be determined
ciently small time interval should be selected to ensure from Table IWB-3641-1 using the appropriate material.
that the flaw size and the associated KI value do not Similarly, for emergency and faulted conditions, the
change significantly during this interval. parameters for Level C and D conditions described in
(3) Update the flaw size. NB-3655 and NB-3656 should be used to determine
(4) Continue the flaw growth analysis for the the allowable flaw depth ao from Table IWB-3641-2.
period during which the sustained stress exists until The use of Tables IWB-3641-1 and IWB-3641-2 is
the end of the evaluation period. determined by the material at the flaw location (local
(b) The above procedure yields the final flaw size, piping material). If the flaw is located in wrought base
af and øf at the end of the evaluation period considering metals, cast stainless steels meeting the requirements
SCC flaw growth alone. of IWB-3641(c), or any welds, Tables IWB-3641-1 and
437
C-3310 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 C-3320
1 2
6 Sm a
P ′b p 2 sin b − sin u (3)
p t
1 2
1 a P
bp p− u−p m
2 t 3 Sm
the results in Tables IWB-3641-1 and IWB-3641-2 can
be reproduced by taking
u p half flawangle
P ′b p SF (Pm + Pb ) − Pm (5)
P ′b is the failure bending stress as defined in paragraphs
(b) and (c) below.
where
For longer flaws penetrating the compressive bending
region where (u + b) >p (see Fig. C-3320-1), the For normal operating conditions
relation between the applied loads and the flaw depth
at incipient plastic collapse is given by
Pm p 0.5 Sm
1 2
6 Sm a
P ′b p 2− sin b (4)
p t (Pm + Pb) p table ordinate value × Sm
where SF p 2.77
p
11 − t − 3 S 2
a Pm For emergency and faulted conditions
bp
a m
2−
t
Pm p 1.0 Sm
up half flaw angle
(Pm + Pb ) p table ordinate value × Sm
P ′b is the failure bending stress as defined in C-3320(b)
and (c).
SF p 1.39
Equations (3) and (4) are solved by trial and error
for the allowable flaw depth using the measured flaw When using the actual piping stresses to determine
length and the applied loads with the appropriate factor an allowable flaw size, the values in Eq. (5) are given by:
of safety given in C-3320(b) or (c). Pmp piping membrane stress
(b) For wrought base metals, cast stainless steels Pbp piping bending stress
meeting the requirements of IWB-3641(c), gas tungsten- SFp 2.77 for normal operating conditions
arc welds (GTAW) and gas metal-arc welds (GMAW), SFp 1.39 for emergency and faulted conditions
438
C-3320 APPENDIX C — NONMANDATORY C-3420
(c) For shielded metal-arc welds (SMAW) and sub- C-3410 EVALUATION PARAMETERS
merged arc welds (SAW), the results in Tables IWB-
The stress ratio used in these tables is the ratio of
3641-1 and IWB-3641-2 can be closely approximated
the hoop stress PD /2t to the allowable design stress
by taking
intensity Sm, where P is the maximum pressure, D is
the nominal outside diameter of the pipe, and t is the
P ′b p Z1 (SF ) (Pm + Pb + Pe / SF ) − Pm (6) nominal thickness of the pipe. The maximum allowable
flaw depth for normal operating conditions an and the
where for normal operatingconditions maximum allowable flaw depth for emergency and
faulted conditions ao are determined as follows.
(a) Determine the nondimensional flaw length
Pm p 0.5 Sm øf√ Rt where øf is the end-of-evaluation period flaw
length, R is the mean radius of the pipe, and t is the
nominal thickness of the pipe.
(Pm + Pb + Pe / SF ) p table ordinate value × Sm /Z1 (b) Calculate the hoop stress ratio (PD /2t) /Sm corres-
ponding to the maximum pressure for normal operating
conditions and the hoop stress ratio corresponding
SF p 2.77 to the maximum pressure for emergency and faulted
conditions.
or for emergency and faulted conditions (c) Determine the maximum allowable flaw depth
an for normal conditions from the value of an /t specified
in Table IWB-3641-3. Similarly, the maximum allow-
Pm p 1.0 Sm able flaw depth ao for emergency and faulted conditions
should be determined from Table IWB-3641-4.
439
C-3420 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 C-3420
3 Sm
sh p (8)
M2
440
APPENDIX D
CONDITIONING OF CLASS 1 AND 2 PIPING WELDS
WHICH REQUIRE EXAMINATION
441
ARTICLE D-1000
INTRODUCTION
D-1100 GENERAL
(a) Piping weld joints should be designed (including
counterbores and surface conditions) and provided with
access to enable the performance of the required preser-
vice and inservice examinations. This applies to shop
fabrication, construction, and repair /replacement activi-
ties. Particular attention should be given to austenitic
and dissimilar metal welds that require ultrasonic exami-
nation.
(b) Workmanship samples or plastic replicas may be
used as references to facilitate the implementation of
surface conditioning requirements in a shop or field
environment.
443
ARTICLE D-2000
ULTRASONIC AND SURFACE EXAMINATION
CONDITIONING
D-2100 GENERAL (b) The flattened surface should have an overall slope
1⁄ of less than 6:1, or 10 deg., relative to the adjacent
(a) Undercut should not be greater than 32 in.
piping surface and should not exceed 1⁄16 in. (1.6 mm)
(0.8 mm) and should not entrap penetrant or magnetic
in height.
particles which could mask unacceptable indications.
(b) The surface finish should be 250 rms or better
for a distance of at least 2T1 plus 2 in. (25 mm) from
the edge of the weld crown on at least one side of
the weld where an ultrasonic examination is required.
This surface finish should not apply to the edges of
D-2300 ALL OTHER WELDS NOT
the weld crown when a flat-topped weld condition is ADDRESSED IN D-2200 (SEE
adequate to perform the required examination. Those FIG. D-2000-2)
edges should only not entrap penetrant which could (a) The weld should be blended flush with the adja-
mask unacceptable indications. cent base material.
(c) Caution should be used during surface condition- (b) If the weld cannot be blended flush then the
ing to avoid violating the minimum wall thickness conditions of D-2200 should apply, except the edge of
requirement. the weld crown should be blended smoothly and gradu-
ally to the adjacent base metal.
D-2200 FERRITIC WELDS WITH
ADEQUATE ACCESS —
GENERALLY AT LEAST 2T
PLUS 2 in. (51 mm) OF ACCESS D-2400 SURFACE EXAMINATION
FROM ONE SIDE OF THE CONDITIONS
WELD — AND ANY
INSTALLED COUNTERBORE Where a surface examination is required without an
ultrasonic examination, then the conditions in D-2200
AT LEAST 2T FROM THE
and D-2300 do not apply. However, the Owner may
WELD ROOT (SEE FIG. D-2000-
desire to have all applicable welds prepared similar to
1) the conditions in D-2200 and D-2300 in order to
(a) As a minimum, the weld should have an essen- minimize personnel radiation exposure during inservice
tially flat-topped crown with the unprepared edges of examination. As a minimum, the surface condition for
the weld less than 1⁄16 in. (1.6 mm) wide. at least 1⁄2 in. from each edge of the weld should
not entrap penetrant which could mask unacceptable
1T p nominal wall thickness indications.
444
Fig. D-2000-1 APPENDIX D — NONMANDATORY Fig. D-2000-2
445
APPENDIX E
EVALUATION OF UNANTICIPATED OPERATING
EVENTS
447
ARTICLE E-1000
INTRODUCTION
449
E-1300 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 E-1300
TABLE E-2
EVALUATION INPUT FOR PLANT AND
EVENT SPECIFIC LINEAR
ELASTIC FRACTURE MECHANICS ANALYSIS
Variable Value
450
APPENDIX F A99
451-458
459
ARTICLE G-1000 A99
INTRODUCTION
461
462
463
stress, where Mb is two-thirds of Mm for the axial 1⁄ -thickness outside surface defect, and (3) the calcu-
4
defect. lated results for the maximum allowable heatup rate
using a 1⁄4-thickness outside surface defect.
98 G-2214.3 Radial Thermal Gradient. The maximum
KI produced by a radial thermal gradient for a postulated
axial or circumferential inside surface defect of G-2120 G-2215 Allowable Pressure 98
is KIt p 0.953 × 10−3 × CR × t 2.5, where CR is the A99
The equations given in this Subarticle provide the
cooldown rate in F/hr., or, for a postulated axial or
basis for determination of the allowable pressure at
circumferential outside surface defect, KIt p 0.753 ×
any temperature at the depth of the postulated defect
10−3 × HU × t2.5, where HU is the heatup rate in F/hr.
during Service Conditions for which Level A and Level
The through-wall temperature difference associated
B Service Limits are specified. In addition to the
with the maximum thermal KI can be determined from
conservatism of these assumptions, it is recommended
Fig. G-2214-1. The temperature at any radial distance
that a factor of 2 be applied to the calculated KI values
from the vessel surface can be determined from Fig.
produced by primary stresses. In shell and head regions
G-2214-2 for the maximum thermal KI.
remote from discontinuities, the only significant loadings
(a) The maximum thermal KI and the temperature
are: (1) general primary membrane stress due to pres-
relationship in Fig. G-2214-1 are applicable only for
sure; and (2) thermal stress due to thermal gradient
the conditions in G-2214.3(a)(1) and (2).
through the thickness during startup and shutdown.
(1) An assumed shape of the temperature gradient
Therefore, the requirement to be satisfied and from
is approximately as shown in Fig. G-2214-2.
which the allowable pressure for any assumed rate of
(2) The temperature change starts from a steady
temperature change can be determined is:
state condition and has a rate, associated with startup
and shutdown, less than about 100°F /hr (56°C/hr. The
results would be overly conservative if applied to rapid 2KIm + KIt < KIc (1)
temperature changes.
(b) Alternatively, the KI for radial thermal gradient throughout the life of the component at each temperature
can be calculated for any thermal stress distribution at with KIm from G-2214.1, KIt from G-2214.3, and KIc
any specified time during cooldown for a 1⁄4-thickness from Fig. G-2210-1.
axial or circumferential surface defect. The allowable pressure at any temperature shall be
For an inside surface defect during cooldown determined as follows.
(a) For the startup condition,
KIt p (1.0359C0 + 0.6322C1 + 0.4753C2 + 0.3855C3) √ a (1) consider postulated defects in accordance with
G-2120;
(2) perform calculations for thermal stress intensity
For an outside surface defect during heatup factors due to the specified range of heat-up rates from
G-2214.3;
KIt p (1.043C0 + 0.630C1 + 0.481C2 + (0.401C3) √ a (3) calculate the KIa toughness for all vessel belt-
line materials from G-2212 using temperatures and
RTNDT values for the corresponding locations of inter-
The coefficients C0, C1, C2, and C3 are determined est; and
from the thermal stress distribution at any specified (4) calculate the pressure as a function of coolant
time during the heatup or cooldown using inlet temperature for each material and location. The
allowable pressure-temperature relationship is the mini-
(x) p C0 + C1 (x/a) + C2 (x/a)2 + C3 (x/a)3 mum pressure at any temperature determined from
(a) the calculated steady-state (KIt p 0) results
for the 1⁄4-thickness inside surface postulated defects
where x is a dummy variable that representsthe radial
using the equation
distance, in., from the appropriate (i.e., inside or outside)
冢冣
surface and a is the maximum crack depth, in.
KIa t⁄
(c) For the startup condition, the allowable pressure Pp Ri
2Mm
vs. temperature relationship is the minimum pressure
at any temperature, determined from (1) the calculated
steady state results for the 1⁄4-thickness inside surface (b) the calculated results from all vessel beltline
defect, (2) the calculated steady state results for the materials for the heatup stress intensity factors using the
464
FIG. G-2214-1
465
G-2215 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 G-2215
FIG. G-2214-2
1⁄ 2
KIa - KIt t the minimum pressure at any temperature, determined
Pp Ri from all vessel beltline materials for the cooldown
2Mm
stress intensity factors using the corresponding 1⁄4-
thickness inside-surface postulated defects.
Those plants having low temperature overpressure
protection (LTOP) systems can use the following load
(b) For the cooldown condition, and temperature conditions to provide protection against
(1) consider postulated defects in accordance with failure during reactor start-up and shutdown operation
G-2120; due to low temperature overpressure events that have
(2) perform calculations for thermal stress intensity been classified as Service Level A or B events. LTOP
factors due to the specified range of cooldown rates systems shall be effective at coolant temperatures less
from G-2214.3; than 200°F or at coolant temperatures corresponding
(3) calculate the KIa toughness for all vessel belt- to a reactor vessel metal temperature less than RTNDT
line materials from G-2212 using temperatures and + 50°F, whichever is greater.2,3 LTOP systems shall
RTNDT values for the corresponding location of inter-
est; and 2 The coolant temperature is the reactor coolant inlet temperature.
(4) calculate the pressure as a function of coolant 3 The vessel metal temperature is the temperature at a distance one
inlet temperature for each material and location using fourth of the vessel section thickness from the inside wetted surface
the equation. in the vessel beltline region. RTNDT is the highest adjusted reference
466
G-2215 APPENDIX G — NONMANDATORY G-2400
limit the maximum pressure in the vessel to 110% of G-2223 Toughness Requirements for Nozzles
the pressure determined to satisfy Eq. (1).
(a) A quantitative evaluation of the fracture toughness
requirements for nozzles is not feasible at this time,
but preliminary data indicate that the design defect size
for nozzles, considering the combined effects of internal
G-2220 NOZZLES, FLANGES, AND SHELL pressure, external loading and thermal stresses, may
REGIONS NEAR GEOMETRIC be a fraction of that postulated for the vessel shell.
DISCONTINUITIES Nondestructive examination methods shall be suffi-
G-2221 General Requirements ciently reliable and sensitive to detect these smaller
defects.
The same general procedure as was used for the (b) WRCB 175 provides an approximate method in
shell and head regions in G-2210 may be used for Paragraph 5C(2) for analyzing the inside corner of a
areas where more complicated stress distributions occur, nozzle and cylindrical shell for elastic stresses due to
but certain modifications of the procedures for determin- internal pressure stress.
ing allowable applied loads shall be followed in order (c) Fracture toughness analysis to demonstrate protec-
to meet special situations, as stipulated in G-2222 and tion against nonductile failure is not required for portions
G-2223. of nozzles and appurtenances having a thickness of 2.5
in. or less, provided the lowest service temperature is
not lower than RTNDT plus 60°F (+33°C).
G-2222 Consideration of Membrane and
Bending Stresses
(a) Equation (1) of G-2215 requires modification to
include the bending stresses which may be important
contributors to the calculated KI value at a point near G-2300 LEVEL C AND LEVEL D
a flange or nozzle. The terms whose sum must be <KIa SERVICE LIMITS
for normal and upset operating conditions are: G-2310 RECOMMENDATIONS
(1) 2KIm from G-2214.1 for primary membrane
stress; The possible combinations of loadings, defect sizes,
(2) 2KIb from G-2214.2 for primary bending stress; and material properties which may be encountered
(3) KIm from G-2214.1 for secondary membrane during Level C and Level D Service Limits are too
stress; diverse to allow the application of definitive rules, and
(4) KIb from G-2214.2 for secondary bending it is recommended that each situation be studied on
stress. an individual case basis. The principles given in this
(b) For purposes of this evaluation, stresses which Appendix may be applied, where applicable, with any
result from bolt preloading shall be considered as postulated loadings, defect sizes, and material toughness
primary. which can be justified for the situation involved.
(c) It is recommended that when the flange and
adjacent shell region are stressed by the full intended
bolt preload and by pressure not exceeding 20% of
the preoperational system hydrostatic test pressure, mini-
mum metal temperature in the stressed region should G-2400 HYDROSTATIC TEST A99
be at least the initial RTNDT temperature for the material TEMPERATURE
in the stressed regions plus any effects of irradiation
at the stressed regions. (a) For system and component hydrostatic tests per-
(d) Thermal stresses shall be considered as secondary formed prior to loading fuel in the reactor vessel, it
except as provided in NB-3213.13(b). The KI of G- is recommended that hydrostatic tests be performed at
2214.3(b) is recommended for the evaluation of thermal a temperature not lower than RTNDT plus 60°F. The
stress. 60°F margin is intended to provide protection against
nonductile failure at the test pressure.
(b) For system and component hydrostatic tests per-
temperature (for weld or base metal in the beltline region) at a
distance one fourth of the vessel section thickness from the vessel formed subsequent to loading fuel in the reactor vessel,
wetted inner surface as determined by Regulatory Guide 1.99, Rev. 2. the minimum test temperature should be determined
467
468
469
ARTICLE G-4000
BOLTING
470
APPENDIX H
EVALUATION OF FLAWS IN FERRITIC PIPING
471
ARTICLE H-1000
INTRODUCTION
H-1100 SCOPE (a) Determine the actual flaw configuration from the
measured flaw in accordance with IWA-3000 using
(a) This Appendix provides a method for determining
H-2000.
the acceptability for continued service of ferritic piping
(b) Resolve the actual flaw into circumferential and
containing flaws that exceed the acceptance standards of
axial flaw components using H-2000.
IWB-3514.2. The evaluation methodology is based on:
(c) Determine the stresses normal to the flaw at the
(1) limit load failure of the pipe cross section
location of the detected flaw for normal operating
(which is reduced by the flaw area) for ductile materials
(including upset and test) conditions and emergency
where the limit load is assured;
and faulted conditions.
(2) elastic-plastic fracture mechanics where ductile
(d) Perform a flaw growth analysis (described in H-
flaw extension may occur prior to reaching limit load;
3000) to establish the end of evaluation period flaw
and
dimensions a f and øl f .
(3) brittle fracture described by linear elastic frac-
(e) Obtain actual pipe material properties at the
ture mechanics.
temperature required for analysis, sy and JIc . When
(b) This Appendix provides a screening procedure
actual material properties are not available, minimum
to determine the failure mechanism based on metal
properties are given in Table H-4211-1 and Table H-
temperature, applied loads, flaw size, and the material
4212-1.
properties. Flaws are evaluated by comparing the maxi-
(f) Using the screening procedure described in
mum flaw dimensions at the end of the evaluation
H-4000, determine the failure mechanism for the mate-
period with the allowable flaw size, or by comparing
rial and temperature.
the actual pipe applied stress with the allowable stress
(g) Using the procedures described in either H-5000,
for the flaw size at the end of the evaluation period.
H-6000, or H-7000 for the three failure modes, deter-
(c) This Appendix provides rules for flaw modeling
mine the allowable flaw depths an and ao , or the
and evaluation. Flaw growth analysis is based on fatigue.
allowable applied stress Sc or Sa .
When stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is active, the
(h) Using the critical flaw parameters af and øf , or
growth shall be added to the growth from fatigue. Flaw
the piping stresses Pb or sh , apply the flaw evaluation
acceptance criteria of IWB-3652 include safety margins
criteria of IWB-3652 to determine the acceptability of
on failure for the three failure mechanisms described
the pipe for continued service.
above. The acceptance criteria shall be used to determine
acceptability of the flawed piping for continued service
until the next inspection (or until the end of service
lifetime) or to determine the time interval until a H-1300 NOMENCLATURE
subsequent inspection.
The following nomenclature is used.
apthe general depth dimension for a flaw, in.
afpthe maximum depth to which the detected
flaw is calculated to grow by the end of
the evaluation period, in.
anpthe maximum allowable flaw depth corres-
H-1200 PROCEDURE OVERVIEW
ponding to the flaw length øf for normal
The following is a summary of the analytical pro- operating (including upset and test) condi-
cedure. tions, in.
473
H-1300 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 H-1300
aopthe maximum allowable flaw depth corres- M2pparameter for circumferential collapse stress
ponding to the flaw length øf for postulated npmaterial constant in flaw growth equation
emergency and faulted conditions, in. NPSpnominal pipe size, in.
Apparameter to establish the Z-factor of Table ppinternal pressure, ksi
H-6310-1, dimensionless Pptotal axial load on pipe including pres-
Copmaterial constant in flaw growth equation sure, kips
CLporientation of a test specimen in the circum- Pmpthe primary membrane stress in the pipe at
ferential direction with longitudinal crack the flaw, ksi
plane orientation Pbpthe primary bending stress in the pipe at
CVNpCharpy V-notched absorbed energy, ft-lb the flaw, ksi
Dppipe outside diameter, in. P′bpbending stress at limit load for any combina-
da /dNpflaw growth rate, in. /cycle tion of primary and expansion stresses, ksi
EpYoungs modulus, ksi Peppipe expansion stress, ksi
E′pE /(1-m2), ksi Qpflaw shape parameter, dimensionless
Fpparameter for axial flaw stress intensity Rpmean radius of pipe, in.
factor R1pinside radius of pipe, in.
Fmpparameter for circumferential flaw mem- R2poutside radius of pipe, in.
brane stress intensity factor Scpallowable bending stress for a circumferen-
Fbpparameter for circumferential flaw bending tially flawed pipe, ksi
stress intensity factor Sapallowable hoop membrane stress for an axi-
J1mmpmeasure of toughness at 1 mm of crack ally flawed pipe, ksi
growth at upper-shelf temperature, in.- Sr′pa component of the screening criteria (SC),
lb /in.2 the ratio of the sum of the primary bending
JIcpmeasure of toughness due to crack extension and expansion stresses to the bending stress
at upper shelf, transition, and lower shelf at limit load, dimensionless
temperatures, in.-lb /in.2 Smpthe design stress intensity value as given
in Table I-1.1 of Section III, ksi
KIpmode I stress intensity factor, ksi √ in.
(SC)pscreening criteria parameter for determining
DKIpthe maximum range of KI fluctuation during
the analysis method, dimensionless
a transient, ksi√ in. (SF)psafety factor, dimensionless
K r′pa component of the screening criteria (SC), tppipe wall thickness, in.
the ratio of the stress intensity factor to the xpparameter a /t, dimensionless
material toughness, dimensionless Zpload multiplier for ductile flaw extension,
KImpmode I stress intensity factor for membrane dimensionless
loading, ksi√ in. apparameter (a /t) /(a /ø), dimensionless
KIbpmode I stress intensity factor for bending bpangle to neutral axis of flawed pipe, radians
loading, ksi√ in.
upone-half of the final flaw angle (see Fig.
H-4221-1), radians
KIrpstress intensity factor for residual stress,
mpPoisson’s ratio
ksi√ in. sf pflow stress as defined in Articles H-5320
øpgeneral flaw length dimension, in. and H-5420, ksi
øf pthe maximum length to which the detected sb′ preference limit load bending stress, ksi
flaw is calculated to grow by the end of søpreference limit load hoop stress, ksi
the evaluation period, in. shphoop stress in pipe at the flaw, ksi
øcritpcritical flaw length for stability of an axial sypmaterial yield stress at temperature as speci-
through-the-wall flaw, in. fied in Table H-4211-1, Table H-4212-1,
Mpapplied moment on the pipe, in.-kips or Table H-6310-2, ksi
474
ARTICLE H-2000
FLAW MODEL FOR ANALYSIS
475
Fig. H-2200-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 Fig. H-2200-2
476
APPENDIX H — NONMANDATORY Fig. H-2400-1
FIG. H-2400-1 FLAW CHARACTERIZATION—SKEWED AXIAL FLAWS PROJECTED INTO AXIAL PLANE
477
Fig. H-2400-2 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
478
APPENDIX H — NONMANDATORY Fig. H-2400-3
479
ARTICLE H-3000
FLAW GROWTH ANALYSIS
480
ARTICLE H-4000
SCREENING CRITERIA
481
Fig. H-4200-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
FIG. H-4200-1 FLOW CHART FOR SCREENING CRITERIA TO ESTABLISH THE ANALYSIS METHOD
482
H-4212 APPENDIX H — NONMANDATORY H-4221.1
TABLE H-4212-1
MATERIAL PROPERTIES FOR
CARBON STEEL BASE METAL AND WELDMENTS
1000 (KIc )2
JIc p
E
Alternatively, values for JIc shall be obtained from FIG. H-4221-1 CIRCUMFERENTIAL FLAW
Table H-4212-1. In the absence of specific data, the GEOMETRY
upper shelf temperature for ferritic piping steels shall
be 200°F (93°C). A lower temperature may be used
to define upper shelf behavior when determined from
valid heat specific Charpy V-notch tests.
where
S ′r p(pD / 2t) / sø (axial flaws)
KImp [P /(2pRt)](pa)0.5Fm
KIbp [M / (pR 2t) + Pe](pa)0.5 Fb
The relevant crack dimensions for this computation and
are shown in Fig. H-4221-1 and Fig. H-4221-2. The Fmp 1.10 + x[0.15241 + 16.772(xu / p)0.855
equations for KI and sb′ are given in H-4221.1 for − 14.944(xu / p)]
483
H-4221.1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 H-4221.2
where
bp
1
2
a
3 P
p− u−p m
t 2.4 Sm 4 xp a / t
M2p [1 + (1.61 / 4Rt)ø2]0.5
484
ARTICLE H-5000
ALLOWABLE FLAW DEPTHS USING LIMIT LOAD
CRITERIA
485
Fig. H-5200-1 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1
FIG. H-5200-1 FLOW CHART FOR MATERIALS MEETING THE LOAD LIMIT CRITERIA
486
Table H-5310-1 APPENDIX H — NONMANDATORY Table H-5310-2
TABLE H-5310-1
ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION PERIOD FLAW DEPTH-TO-THICKNESS RATIO
FOR CIRCUMFERENTIAL FLAWS, NORMAL OPERATING (INCLUDING UPSET AND
TEST) CONDITIONS (LIMIT LOAD ANALYSIS)
TABLE H-5310-2
ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION PERIOD FLAW DEPTH-TO-THICKNESS RATIO
FOR CIRCUMFERENTIAL FLAWS, EMERGENCY AND FAULTED CONDITIONS
(LIMIT LOAD ANALYSIS)
487
H-5320 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 H-5420
and the flaw depth at incipient plastic collapse is tions are given in Table H-5410-1 and for emergency
given by and faulted conditions in Table H-5410-2. Using the
maximum value of the normal operating condition
P′b p
2sf
p 1
2−
a
t 2
sin b
pressure circumferential stress during the evaluation
interval and the øf flaw parameter defined in H-3210,
the maximum allowable flaw depth an of an axial flaw
where under these conditions shall be determined from Table
H-5410-1. Similarly, the maximum allowable flaw depth
bp
p
a
31 − at − Ps 4
m
f
ao of an axial flaw under emergency and faulted condi-
tions shall be determined from Table H-5410-2, using
2− the maximum value of the applied circumferential stress
t
for these conditions. The allowable flaw depths an and
The allowable pipe bendingstress Sc is ao shall be used in the acceptance criteria of IWB-
3652(a) to determine the acceptability of the flawed
P ′b
3 4
1 pipe for continued service.
Sc p − Pm 1 −
(SF) (SF)
sh p sf / M 2
H-5410 ALLOWABLE FLAW DEPTHS
The allowable flaw depths an and ao, determined from
(TABULAR SOLUTION)
Eq. (4) above, shall be used in the acceptance criteria
Allowable flaw depths for a given final flaw length of IWB-3652(a) to determine the acceptability of the
under normal operating (including upset and test) condi- flawed pipe for continued service.
488
TABLE H-5410-1 ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION PERIOD FLAW DEPTH1-TO-THICKNESS RATIO FOR AXIAL
FLAWS, NORMAL OPERATING (INCLUDING UPSET AND TEST) CONDITIONS (LIMIT LOAD ANALYSIS
[Note (2)] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0
0.40 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.65 0.61 0.57 0.56 0.55 (4)
0.45 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.74 0.67 0.63 0.59 0.55 0.51 0.50 0.49 (4)
0.50 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.69 0.61 0.56 0.53 0.49 0.45 0.43 (4) (4)
0.55 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.74 0.62 0.54 0.49 0.38 0.42 0.38 (4) (4) (4)
0.60 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.55 0.47 0.42 0.46 0.34 0.31 (4) (4) (4)
0.65 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.60 0.46 0.38 0.33 0.30 0.27 (4) (4) (4) (4)
0.70 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.57 0.48 0.34 0.27 0.23 0.21 0.18 (4) (4) (4) (4)
0.75 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.50 0.38 0.30 0.19 0.15 0.12 0.11 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
0.80 0.75 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
NOTES:
(1) Flaw depth p an for a surface flaw (3) øf p end of evaluation period flaw length
2an for a subsurface flaw R p mean radius of the pipe
Linear interpolation is permissible (4) Table IWB-3514-1 shall be used.
(2) Stress Ratio p (pD /2t) Sm
489
TABLE H-5410-2 ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION PERIOD FLAW DEPTH1-TO-THICKNESS RATIO FOR AXIAL
FLAWS, EMERGENCY AND FAULTED CONDITIONS (LIMIT LOAD ANALYSIS)
0.80 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.65 0.63 0.61 (4)
0.90 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.74 0.67 0.63 0.59 0.57 (4) (4)
1.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.69 0.61 0.56 0.53 (4) (4) (4)
1.10 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.74 0.62 0.54 0.49 0.46 (4) (4) (4)
1.20 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.55 0.47 0.42 (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.30 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.60 0.46 0.38 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.40 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.69 0.57 0.48 0.34 0.27 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.50 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.50 0.38 0.30 0.19 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.60 0.75 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
NOTES:
(1) Flaw depth p an for a surface flaw (3) øf p end of evaluation period flow length
2an for a subsurface flaw R p mean radius of the pipe
Linear interpolation is permissible (4) Table IWB-3514-1 shall be used.
(2) Stress Ratio p (pD /2t)/ Sm
Table H-5410-2
ARTICLE H-6000
ALLOWABLE FLAW DEPTHS FOR FLAWED PIPE
MEETING THE EPFM CRITERIA
490
H-6310 APPENDIX H — NONMANDATORY H-6320
FIG. H-6200-1 FLOW CHART FOR MATERIALS FOR WHICH DUCTILE FLAW EXTENSION MAY OCCUR
PRIOR TO LIMIT LOAD
P ′b
from Step 1. Determine the allowable flaw
depth, using linear interpolation if necessary.
Sc p
1
1
(SF) Z 2 1
− Pe − Pm 1 −
1
Z(SF) 2
where
P′b p bending stress at incipient plastic collapse deter-
mined from H-5320
Zp load multiplier from Table H-6310-1 for speci-
H-6320 ALLOWABLE APPLIED STRESS fied material properties or from Table H-6310-
(ANALYTICAL SOLUTION) 2 for actual material properties
The allowable bending stress Sc in the flawed pipe (SF)p safety factor
for a given end of evaluation period flaw size for either p 2.77 for normal operating (including upset and
normal operating (including upset and test) conditions test) conditions
or emergency and faulted conditions shall be deter- p 1.39 for emergency and faulted conditions.
mined using The limits of applicability of this equation are
491
H-6320 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 H-6420
TABLE H-6310-2
LOAD MULTIPLIERS FOR CARBON STEEL BASE METALS AND WELDMENTS FOR
USER-SPECIFIED DATA
Material
Material Category Properties
[Note (1)] [Note (2)] Z Factor [Note (3)]
1 27.1 < sy ≤ 40.0
600 ≤ JIc < 1050 Z p 2.281M1 [1 + 0.0210A(NPS − 4)]/ sy0.46
JIc ≥ 1050 Z p 1.958M1 [1 + 0.0152A(NPS − 4)]/ sy0.46
2 27.1 ≤ sy ≤ 40.0
350 ≤ JIc < 600 Z p 2.566M1 [1 + 0.0184A(NPS − 4)]/ sy0.46
600 ≤ JIc < 1050 Z p 2.281M1 [1 + 0.0210A(NPS − 4)]/ sy0.46
JIc ≥ 1050 Z p 1.958M1 [1 + 0.0152A(NPS − 4)]/ sy0.46
NOTES:
(1) Material categories are defined in Table H-6310-1.
(2) sy and JIc are in units of ksi and in.-lb/in.2, respectively. sy p 0.2% offset yield strength at temperature
or the Section III, Appendix I value at temperature.
(3) M1 is the ratio of the flow stress (sf) used in the limit load calculation to the design stress (Sm). When
using Table H-5310-1 and H-5310-2 to evaluate the allowable flaw size, use M1 p 2.4 and Sm p 18.1
ksi. When a different Sm is used, the procedures of H-6320 shall be used. When Z is calculated to be
less than M1 /2.4, use Z p M1 /2.4.
A p [0.125(r/t − 0.25]0.25for 5 ≤ R/t ≤ 10
A p [0.4(R/t − 3.0]0.25 for 10 < R/t ≤ 20
0.75 ≥ a / t > values of Table IWB-3514-1 lb / in.2 or greater for normal operating (including upset
and test) conditions shall be obtained from Table H-
6410-1 and for emergency and faulted conditions in
The allowable pipe bending stress shall be used in the Table H-6410-2. Using the maximum value of the
acceptance criteria of IWB-3652(b) to determine the normal operating condition pressure circumferential
acceptability of the flawed pipe for continued service. stress during the evaluation interval and the øf flaw
parameter defined in H-3210, the maximum allowable
flaw depth, an , of an axial flaw under these conditions
shall be determined from Table H-6410-1. Similarly,
the maximum allowable flaw depth, ao , of an axial
H-6400 AXIAL FLAWS flaw under emergency and faulted conditions shall be
determined from Table H-6410-2, using the maximum
Allowable flaw depths for materials where JIc in the value of the applied circumferential stress for these
CL direction is not less than 600 in.-lb / in.2 shall be conditions. The allowable flaw depths an and ao shall
determined in accordance with H-6410. Alternatively, be used in the acceptance criteria of IWB-3652(a) to
equations for allowable flaw depths given in H-6420 determine the acceptability of the flawed pipe for
shall be satisfied using specified or actual (when avail- continued service.
able) material properties and actual piping system load-
ings. Tables of allowable flaw sizes for materials with
the specified properties given in H-4212 are in course
of preparation.
492
TABLE H-6410-1 ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION PERIOD FLAW DEPTH-TO-THICKNESS RATIO FOR AXIAL
FLAWS, NORMAL (INCLUDING UPSET AND TEST) CONDITIONS 1
Stress Ratio
[Note (2)] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8
0.40 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.70 0.66 0.63 0.61 0.59 0.58 0.57 0.56 0.45 (4)
0.45 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.62 0.57 0.54 0.52 0.50 0.49 0.48 0.39 (4) (4)
0.50 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.51 0.49 0.47 0.44 0.42 0.41 0.34 (4) (4) (4) (4)
0.55 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.62 0.48 0.43 0.39 0.37 0.36 0.29 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
0.60 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.51 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.26 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
0.65 0.75 0.75 0.70 0.38 0.33 0.28 0.23 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
0.70 0.75 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.27 0.19 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
0.75 0.75 0.60 0.38 0.15 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
0.80 0.75 0.50 0.12 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
NOTES:
(1) JIc ≥ 600 in.-lb/in.2 in the CL direction (4) Table IWB-3514-1 shall be used.
(2) Stress Ratio = (pD /2t)/18.1
(3) øf = end of evaluation period flaw length
R = mean radius of the pipe
t = thickness
493
TABLE H-6410-2 ALLOWABLE END-OF-EVALUATION PERIOD FLAW DEPTH-TO-THICKNESS RATIO FOR AXIAL
FLAWS, (EMERGENCY AND FAULTED CONDITIONS)1
0.80 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.70 0.66 0.63 0.61 0.59 0.58 0.57 0.56 0.45 (4)
0.90 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.62 0.57 0.54 0.52 0.50 0.49 0.48 0.39 (4) (4)
1.00 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.51 0.49 0.47 0.44 0.42 0.41 0.34 (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.10 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.62 0.48 0.43 0.39 0.37 0.36 0.29 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.20 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.51 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.26 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.30 0.75 0.75 0.70 0.38 0.33 0.28 0.23 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.40 0.75 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.27 0.19 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.50 0.75 0.60 0.38 0.15 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
1.60 0.75 0.50 0.12 (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)
NOTES:
(1) JIc ≥ 600 in.-lb/in.2 in the CL direction (4) Table IWB-3514-1 shall be used.
(2) Stress Ratio = (pD /2t)/18.1
(3) øf = end of evaluation period flaw length
R = mean radius of the pipe
t = thickness
Table H-6410-2
ARTICLE H-7000
ALLOWABLE FLAW DEPTHS FOR FLAWED PIPE
MEETING THE LEFM CRITERIA
H-7100 SCOPE
This Article provides the methodology for determin-
ing allowable flaw depths in flawed ferritic piping
meeting the linear elastic fracture mechanics criteria
of H-4000 when ductile crack extension does not occur
prior to fracture. Solutions are given for both axial
and circumferential flaws and are presented in the
form of equations that shall be used with the material
properties obtained in accordance with H-4211 or H-
4212, for circumferential and axial flaws, respectively.
Applied stresses shall include residual stresses.
494
H-7300 APPENDIX H — NONMANDATORY H-7400
KI p KIm + KIr
where
pR
KImp (SF) (pa / Q)0.5F
t
(SF)p safety factor
p 3.0 for normal operating (including upset and
test) conditions
p 1.5 for emergency and faulted conditions
and the other terms are defined in H-4221.2(a). Residual
stresses shall be included with a safety factor of 1.0.
495
APPENDIX J
GUIDE TO PLANT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES
AND SECTION XI REPAIR /REPLACEMENT
ACTIVITIES
497
ARTICLE J-1000
SCOPE
499
A99 500
501
ARTICLE J-3000
MAINTENANCE REQUIRING SUBSEQUENT
SECTION XI TEST OR EXAMINATION
(a) Maintenance activities within this category are (1) adjustment of packing, removal of bonnet, stem
not within the scope of Section XI but are performed and assembly or actuator, or disconnection of hydraulic or
controlled in accordance with the Owner’s procedures. electrical lines on valves, as required by Subsection
However, due to the nature of the work or item involved, IWV;
Section XI tests or examinations are required to be (2) changing oil, flushing the cooling system, ad-
performed subsequent to completion of the maintenance justing packing, adding packing rings or mechanical seal
work activity. maintenance on pumps, as required by Subsection IWP;
(b) The maintenance activities within this category (3) grinding or machining on valve disk seating
differ from the maintenance activities described in surfaces;
Article J-4000 in that these activities are performed on (4) removing arc strikes or weld spatter, in the
items within the Section XIx boundary and these activi-
area of previous PSI /ISI surface examinations;
ties affect the existing inspection, test, or examination
(5) preparing welds for NDE;
record required by this Division.
(6) adjustment of pressure relief device set points
(c) The following are some examples of maintenance
in accordance with the existing design requirements.
activities that may require subsequent Section XI test
or examination:
502
ARTICLE J-4000
MAINTENANCE NOT REQUIRING SUBSEQUENT
SECTION XI TEST OR EXAMINATION
503
APPENDIX K
ASSESSMENT OF REACTOR VESSELS WITH
LOW UPPER SHELF CHARPY IMPACT ENERGY
LEVELS
505
ARTICLE K-1000
INTRODUCTION
K-1100 SCOPE dures for Level C and D Service Loadings are provided
in K-5000.
This Appendix provides acceptance criteria and evalu-
ation procedures for determining acceptability for opera-
tion of a reactor vessel when the vessel metal tempera-
ture is in the upper shelf range. The methodology
is based on the principles of elastic-plastic fracture K-1300 GENERAL NOMENCLATURE A99
mechanics. Flaws shall be postulated in the reactor
apflaw depth that includes ductile flaw
vessel at locations of predicted low upper shelf Charpy
extension (in.)
impact energy, and the applied J-integral for these flaws aepeffective flaw depth that includes ductile
shall be calculated and compared with the J-integral
flaw extension and a plastic-zone correc-
fracture resistance of the material to determine accept-
tion (in.)
ability. All specified design transients for the reactor
ae*peffective flaw depth at onset of flaw
vessel shall be considered.
instability, including ductile flaw exten-
sion and a plastic-zone correction (in.)
aoppostulated initial flaw depth (in.)
⌬apamount of ductile flaw extension (in.)
⌬a*pamount of ductile flaw extension at onset
of flaw instability (in.)
C1, C2pmaterial constants used to describe the
power-law fit to the J-integral resistance
curve for the material, JR p C1 (⌬a)C2
Cmpmaterial coefficient for calculation of
K-1200 PROCEDURE
stress intensity factor due to radial ther-
The following analytical procedure shall be used. mal gradient [ksi-hour/(in.2-°F)]
(a) Reactor vessel flaws shall be postulated in accord- (CR)pcooldown rate (°F /hr)
ance with the criteria of K-2000. dpthermal diffusivity (in.2/hour)
(b) Loading conditions at the locations of the postu- EpYoung’s modulus (ksi)
lated flaws shall be determined for Level A, B, C, and E ′p E /(1-2) (ksi)
D Service Loadings. F1, F2, F3pgeometry factors used to calculate the
(c) Material properties, including E, y, and the J- stress intensity factor (dimensionless)
integral resistance curve (J-R curve), shall be determined F1*, F2*, F3*pgeometry factors used to calculate the
at the locations of the postulated flaws. Requirements stress intensity factor at onset of flaw
for determining the J-R curve are provided in K-3300. instability (dimensionless)
(d) The postulated flaws shall be evaluated in accord- JpJ-integral due to the applied loads (in.-
ance with the acceptance criteria of K-2000. Require- lb /in.2)
ments for evaluating the applied J-integral are provided JRpJ-integral fracture resistance for the mate-
in K-3200, and for determining flaw stability in K-3400. rial (in.-lb /in.2)
Three permissible evaluation methods are described in J0.1p J-integral fracture resistance for the mate-
K-3500. Detailed calculation procedures for Levels A rial at a ductile flaw extension of 0.10
and B Service Loadings are provided in K-4000. Proce- in. (in.-lb /in.2)
507
508
509
K-2400 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 K-2400
510
ARTICLE K-3000
ANALYSIS
511
512
K-4100 SCOPE lated with a safety factor (SF) on pressure using the
following:
This Article contains calculation procedures to satisfy
the acceptance criteria in K-2000 for Level A and B
Service Loadings. A procedure to satisfy the J-integral KIp p (SF) p (1 + Ri /2t) (pa) 0.5 F2 (2)
criteria for a specified amount of flaw extension of 0.1
in. is provided in K-4200. Procedures to satisfy the where
flaw stability criteria are provided in K-4300. These
procedures include axial and circumferential flaw orien- F2 p 0.885 + 0.233 (a /t) + 0.345 (a /t) 2
tations.
This equation for KIp is valid for 0.2 ≤ a /t ≤ 0.5, and
includes the effect of pressure acting on the flaw faces.
K-4200 EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR (c) For an axial or circumferential flaw of depth a,
THE APPLIED J-INTEGRAL the stress intensity factor due to radial thermal gradients
shall be calculated using the following:
K-4210 CALCULATION OF THE APPLIED
J-INTEGRAL
KIt p Cm (CR) t 2.5 F3 (3)
Calculation of the applied J-integral consists of two
steps: Step 1 calculates effective flaw depth, including where
a plastic-zone correction; and Step 2 calculates the J-
integral for small scale yielding based on this effective
F3 p 0.1181 + 0.5353 (a /t) − 1.273 (a /t) 2 + 0.6046 (a /t) 3
flaw depth.
Step 1.
(a) For an axial flaw of depth a, the stress intensity Ea
factor due to internal pressure shall be calculated with Cm p
[(1− v) d]
a safety factor (SF ) on pressure using the following:
For SA-302 Grades A and B, SA-533 Grade B, Class
KIp p (SF) p (1 + Ri /t) (pa) 0.5 F1 (1) 1, and SA-508 Classes 2 and 3 steels, and their
associated weldments, Cm equal to 0.0051 (ksi-hr)/(in.2-
where °F) can be used. Properties given in Part D of Section
II can be used to determine Cm for other materials.
F1 p 0.982 + 1.006 (a /t)2 This equation for KIt is valid for 0.20 ≤ a /t ≤ 0.50,
and 0 ≤ (CR) ≤ 100°F /hr.
This equation for KIp is valid for 0.2 ≤ a /t ≤ 0.5, and (d) The effective flaw depth for small scale yielding,
includes the effect of pressure acting on the flaw faces. ae, shall be calculated using the following:
(b) For a circumferential flaw of depth a, the stress
intensity factor due to internal pressure shall be calcu- ae p a + [1 /(6p)] [(K Ip + K It) / sy] 2
513
K-4210 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 K-4310
FIG. K-4310-1 COMPARISON OF THE SLOPES OF THE APPLIED J-INTEGRAL CURVE AND THE J-R CURVE
514
K-4310 APPENDIX K — NONMANDATORY K-4322
FIG. K-4320-1 FAILURE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR THE ONE-QUARTER WALL THICKNESS FLAW
be equal to the accumulation pressure for Level A and 4320-1. These curves are based on material properties
B Service Loadings, Pa; and the safety factor (SF) on which are characteristic of reactor pressure vessel steels.
pressure shall be 1.25. The applied J-integral shall be
plotted against crack depth on the crack driving force
K-4322 Failure Assessment Point Coordinates
diagram to produce the applied J-integral curve, as
illustrated in Fig. K-4310-1. The J-R curve shall be The flaw depth a for ductile flaw extension ⌬a is
plotted on the crack driving force diagram, and shall given by the following:
intersect the horizontal axis at the initial flaw depth,
ao. Flaw stability at a given applied load is verified a p 0.25t + ⌬a
when the slope of the applied J-integral curve is less
than the slope of the J-R curve at the point on the J- The failure assessment point coordinates, Sr′ and Kr′,
R curve where the two curves intersect. for ductile flaw extension ⌬a shall be calculated as
follows:
515
TABLE K-4320-1 pressure is given by Eq. (2). The stress intensity factor
COORDINATES OF THE FAILURE ASSESSMENT due to radial thermal gradients is given by Eq. (3).
DIAGRAM CURVES OF FIG. K-4320-1 (b) The reference limit-load pressure is given by the
following:
Kr For Axial Kr For Circum-
Sr Flaw Curve ferential Flaw Curve
y [1 − 0.91 (0.25 + (⌬a /t))2 (t /R i)]
0.000 1.000 1.000 Po p
1 + (R i /2t)
0.050 1.000 1.000
0.100 0.999 0.999
0.150 0.998 0.998 (c) For materials with yield strength y greater than
0.200 0.996 0.996 85 ksi (586 MPa), y in this equation shall be 85 ksi
0.250 0.993 0.994
(586 MPa). This equation for Po is valid for 0 ≤ ⌬a /t
0.300 0.990 0.991
0.350 0.987 0.986 ≤ 0.25.
0.400 0.981 0.978
0.450 0.973 0.965
0.500 0.960 0.943 K-4323 Evaluation Using Criterion for Flaw
0.550 0.939 0.908 Stability
0.600 0.908 0.856
0.650 0.864 0.788 Assessment points shall be calculated for each loading
0.700 0.807 0.706 condition in accordance with K-4322, and shall be
0.750 0.737 0.618 plotted on Fig. K-4320-1 as follows. A series of assess-
0.800 0.660 0.532
ment points for various amounts of ductile flaw exten-
0.850 0.581 0.452
0.900 0.505 0.383 sion, ⌬a, up to the validity limit of the J-R curve shall
0.950 0.435 0.323 be plotted. Pressure p equal to the accumulation pressure
1.000 0.374 0.274 for Level A and B Service Loadings, Pa, and safety
1.050 0.321 0.232 factor (SF) on pressure of 1.25 shall be used. When
1.100 0.276 0.198
one or more assessment points lie inside the failure
assessment curve, the acceptance criteria based on flaw
stability in K-2200(a)(2) are satisfied.
where (SF) is the required safety factor on pressure. K-4330 J-INTEGRAL / TEARING MODULUS
The procedure for calculating KIp, KIt, and Po for axial PROCEDURE
flaws is provided by K-4322.1, and for circumferential
flaws by K-4322.2. Use of this procedure shall be limited to a postulated
initial flaw depth of one-quarter of the wall thickness.
K-4322.1 Axial Flaws
(a) The stress intensity factor due to internal pressure
for axial flaws with a safety factor (SF) on pressure K-4331 J-Integral at Flaw Instability A99
is given by Eq. (1). The stress intensity factor due to (a) In Fig. K-4330-1, the onset of flaw instability
radial thermal gradients is given by Eq. (3). is the point of intersection of the applied and material
(b) The reference limit-load pressure is given by the curves plotted on a graph of the J-integral versus tearing
following: modulus (J versus T). The expression for the applied
J versus T curve is given by the following:
(2 / √ 3 )y[0.905 − 0.379 (⌬a /t)]
Po p
[0.379 + (R i /t) + 0.379(⌬a /t)] J p (1000 W t f2 /E)T (4)
(c) For materials with yield strength y greater than where f is a reference flow stress of 85 ksi.
85 ksi (586 MPa), y in this equation shall be 85 ksi (b) For axial flaws Eq. (5) applies:
(586 MPa). This equation for Po is valid for 0 ≤ ⌬a /t
≤ 0.10. W p 0.235[1 + (0.083 × 10−3)(CR)t 2 /((SF)Ps)] (5)
A99 K-4322.2 Circumferential Flaws
(a) The stress intensity factor due to internal pressure where Ps is the pressure under evaluation. Eq. (5) is
for circumferential flaws with a safety factor (SF) on valid for 6 ≤ t ≤ 12 in., 2.25 ≤ (SF) Ps ≤ 5.00 ksi,
516
and 0 ≤ (CR) ≤ 100°F /hr. For circumferential flaws TR p [E /(1000 f2)] dJR /da (7)
Eq. (6) applies:
W p 0.21[1 + (0.257 × 10−3)(CR)t 2 /((SF)Ps)] (6) The same values for E and f shall be used in Eqs.
(4) and (7). The J-integral versus tearing modulus JR
versus TR curve for the material is obtained by plotting
Eq. (6) is valid for 6 ≤ t ≤ 12 in., 2.25 ≤ (SF)Ps ≤ JR against TR for a series of increments in ductile flaw
9.00 ksi, and 0 ≤ (CR) ≤ 100°F /hr. Eqs. (4), (5), extension. Each coordinate for JR shall be evaluated
and (6) are based on material properties which are at the same ductile flaw extension as the coordinate
characteristic of reactor pressure vessel steels. for TR.
(c) The tearing modulus for the material is deter- (d) The value of the J-integral at the onset of flaw
mined by differentiation of the J-R curve with respect instability, J *, corresponds to the intersection of the
to flaw depth a. applied J versus T curve given by Eq. (4) with the
517
material JR versus TR curve, as illustrated in Fig. K- materials. This equation for K *It is valid for 0.2 ≤ a*e
4330-1. /t ≤ 0.5, and 0 ≤ (CR) ≤ 100°F /hr. The stress intensity
(e) The J-integral at the onset of flaw instability factor for small scale yielding due to internal pressure
may be determined analytically when a power-law curve at the onset of flaw instability, K *Ip, is given by the
fit to the J-R curve of the form following:
is available. The J-integral at the onset of flaw instability, (c) For a given value of K *Ip, the internal pressure
J *, is given by the following: at the onset of flaw instability for axial flaws is given
by the following:
J * p C1 (W t C2)C2
P * p K *Ip / [(1 + (R i ⁄ t))(a*e) 0.5 F *1]
(b) The stress intensity factor due to radial thermal F *2 p 0.885 + 0.233(a*e /t) + 0.345(a*e /t) 2
gradients at the onset of flaw instability, K *It, for axial
or circumferential flaws is given by the following: These equations for P* are valid for 0.2 ≤ a*e /t ≤ 0.5,
and include the effect of pressure acting on the flaw
K *It p Cm (CR)t 2.5 F *3 faces.
518
J1 < J0.1
K-5200 EVALUATION PROCEDURE
FOR THE APPLIED (b) For time-dependent Level C Service Loadings,
J-INTEGRAL evaluation shall be in accordance with K-5400.
A99 K-5210 CALCULATION OF THE APPLIED
J-INTEGRAL
K-5300 EVALUATION PROCEDURE
(a) Stress intensity factors shall be calculated as a FOR FLAW STABILITY
function of flaw depth, a for Level C and D Service
Loadings for each applicable stress component, as fol- (a) For Level C and D Service Loadings, flaw stabil-
lows. Calculate KI due to internal pressure, radial ity shall be evaluated by direct application of the flaw
thermal gradient through the vessel wall, and cladding/ stability requirements of K-3400. The applied J-integral
base metal differential thermal expansion. for Level C and D Service Loadings shall be calculated
(b) The effective flaw depth for small-scale yielding, in accordance with K-5210 for a series of flaw depths
ae shall be calculated using corresponding to increasing amounts of ductile flaw
extension, ⌬a. A flaw depth a equal to a0 + ⌬a shall
be used to calculate the applied J-integral. The J-integral
ae p a + [1/(6)](KI /y)2 resistance at each value of ⌬a shall be determined from
the J-R curve. Flaw stability at a given applied load
(c) The stress intensity factor for small-scale yielding, is verified when K-3400(a) and K-3400(b) are satisfied.
KI′, shall be calculated by substituting ae for a in (a) Acceptance criteria based on flaw stability for Level
above. C Service Loadings in K-2300(a)(2), and for Level D
(d) The J-integral due to applied loads for small- Service Loadings in K-2400(a), are satisfied when flaw
scale yielding shall be calculated using stability is verified for the range in a0 specified in K-
2300 and K-2400.
(b) For Level D Service Loadings, for the range in
J p 1000(KI′)2 /E′ a0 specified in K-2400, demonstrate that the total flaw
519
520
521
ARTICLE L-1000
INTRODUCTION
523
ARTICLE L-2000
FATIGUE USAGE EVALUATION
524
ARTICLE L-3000
FLAW TOLERANCE EVALUATION
525
L-3220 1998 SECTION XI — DIVISION 1 L-3341
526
L-3342 APPENDIX L — NONMANDATORY L-3430
L-3400 EXAMINATION
REQUIREMENTS
L-3420 SUCCESSIVE EXAMINATIONS
L-3410 EXAMINATIONS
Component locations of concern shall be examined
(a) The absence of any flaw exceeding the applicable in accordance with the successive inspection schedule
acceptance standard referenced in Table IWB-3410-1, requirements in Table L-3420-1.
at the component location of concern, shall be verified
by surface or volumetric examination. Otherwise, this
Appendix is not applicable, and the flaw shall be L-3430 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
evaluated in accordance with IWB-3400. Personnel performing surface or volumetric examina-
(b) Examinations shall be conducted in accordance tions required by L-3410 and L-3420 shall be qualified
with IWA-2220, IWA-2230, or IWA-2240, as appli- and certified in accordance with the applicable require-
cable. ments of IWA-2300.
527
ARTICLE L-4000
RECORDS AND REPORTS
L-4100 SCOPE
This Article provides record and report requirements
for evaluations and examinations required by L-2000
and L-3000.
528
APPENDIX M 98
529
ARTICLE M-1000 98
INTRODUCTION
M-1100 SCOPE
This Appendix provides criteria for validation of
mathematical models used to predict equivalence in
examination coverage and misorientation angle. This
Article will ensure that extensions of examination proce-
dures, based upon predictions of a mathematical model,
to geometries not specifically addressed in performance
demonstrations by the ultrasonic system, are valid.
531
ARTICLE M-2000
VALIDATION OF MATHEMATICAL MODELS
532