You are on page 1of 54

Grinding and Finishing

Illegitimi non carborundum

ver. 1

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 1
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Overview

• Processes
• Analysis

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 2
Singh/Melkote/Colton
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 3
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Horizontal Grinding

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 4
Singh/Melkote/Colton
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 5
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Horizontal grinding Vertical grinding

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 6
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Centered grinding

Centerless grinding

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 7
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Creep Feed Grinding

• Full depth and stock is removed with


one or two passes at low work speed
• Very high forces are generated
• High rigidity and power

Advantages
• Increased accuracy
• Efficiency
• Improved surface finish
• Burr reduction
• Reduced stress and fatigue

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 8
Singh/Melkote/Colton
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 9
Singh/Melkote/Colton
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 10
Singh/Melkote/Colton
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 11
Singh/Melkote/Colton
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 12
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding Wheels

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 13
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding Wheels

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 14
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding Wheel Information

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 15
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Correctly Mounted Wheel

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 16
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding Wheel Surface

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 17
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grind Wheel Dressing

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 18
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding Wheel Dressing

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 19
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding Chips

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 20
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Chip formation geometry

l D
t

q
V
t
d l

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 21
Singh/Melkote/Colton
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Chip geometry

• As with rolling contact length, the chip length,


l
– D = wheel diameter, d = depth of cut

l  Dd
• Material removal rate, MRR
– v = workpiece velocity, d = depth of cut, b = width
of cut
MRR  v  d  b
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 23
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Material removal rate

• The chips have a triangular cross-section,


and ratio (r) of chip thickness (t) to chip width
w
(w)

w
r   10 to 20 t
l
t
• So, the average volume per chip
1 1 1
Volchip  w  t  l  wtl
2 2 4
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 24
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Chips

• The number of chips removed per unit time


(n), where c = number of cutting edges
(grains) per unit area (typ. 0.1 to 10 per mm2,
and V = peripheral wheel velocity

n V bc

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 25
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Combining

MRR  v  d  b  n Volchip
1
v  d  b  Vbc  wtl
4
w  r t l  Dd

1
vd b V cb r t t  Dd
4
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 26
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Chip thickness

4v  d
t 
2

V cr Dd
or

4v d
t
V cr D

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 27
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Specific grinding energy, u

• Consist of chip formation, plowing, and sliding

u  uchip  u plowing  usliding

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 28
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Total grinding force

• Get force from power

Power  u  MRR

Fgrinding V  u  v  d  b
v  d b
Fgrinding  u 
V

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 29
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Total grinding force

• From empirical results, as t decreases, the


friction component of u increases
1 1
u or u  K1 
t t
substituting

1 v  d b
Fgrinding  K1  
t V
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 30
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Total grinding force

Substituting for t

v  d b
1
Fgrinding  K1  
4v d V

V cr D
rearranging

d cr v
Fgrinding  K1  b   Dd
4V
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 31
Singh/Melkote/Colton ME 6222: Manufacturing Processes and
Systems Prof. J.S. Colton © GIT 2006
Force on a grain

• The force per grain can be calculated

Fgrain  u  Area
1
w  rt
Fgrain  u  wt and
u  K1 
1
2 t
1 1
Fgrain  K1    r  t  t
t 2
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 32
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Force on a grain

substituting for t, and rearranging

K1 4v d
Fgrain   r 
2 V cr D

vr d
Fgrain  K1 
V c D

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 33
Singh/Melkote/Colton ME 6222: Manufacturing Processes and
Systems Prof. J.S. Colton © GIT 2006
Grinding temperature
• Temperature rise goes with energy delivered
per unit area

Energy input
T  K2 
area

u bl  d 1
T  K2   K2  K1   d
bl t
1
T  K1  K2  d 
4v d
Vcr D
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 34
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding temperature

• Rearranging
3 𝑉𝑐𝑟
∆𝑇 = 𝐾1 𝐾2 𝑑 4 𝐷
4𝑣

• Temperatures can be up to 1600oC, but for a


short time.

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 35
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding – Ex. 1-1

• You are grinding a steel, which has a specific


grinding energy (u) of 35 W-s/mm3.
• The grinding wheel rotates at 3600 rpm, has a
diameter (D) of 150 mm, thickness (b) of 25 mm, and
(c) 5 grains per mm2. The motor has a power of 2
kW.
• The work piece moves (v) at 1.5 m/min. The chip
thickness ratio (r) is 10.
• Determine the grinding force and force per grain.
• Determine the temperature (K2 is 0.2oK-mm/N).
Room temperature is 20oC.
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 36
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding – Ex. 1-2

• First we need to calculate the depth of cut.


We can do this from the power.

Power  u  MRR  u  v  d  b
W s m 6 mm
2
min
2000 W  35 3
1.5  d  25 mm 10 2

mm min m 60 sec

d  91.4 106 m

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 37
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding – Ex. 1-3

• Now for the total grinding force

v  d b
Fgrinding  u 
V
mm 3
W s 1500  91.4  10 mm  25 mm
Fgrinding  35  min
mm3 3600 rev 150 mm  m
min rev 1000 mm

Fgrinding  70.7 N

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 38
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding – Ex. 1-4

• Next, the force per grain


1 w  rt
Fgrain  u  wt and
2
1
Fgrain  u  r  t  t
2
we need t
mm
4v d 4  1500 91.4 103 mm
t  min
V cr D 3600  150
mm grains
5  10 150 mm
min mm2
t  1.32 103 mm
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 39
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding – Ex. 1-5

• Substituting
1 1
Fgrain  u  r  t  t  35  10  1.32 10
2 2
3 2
 
4
Fgrain  3.05 10 J / mm

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 40
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding – Ex. 1-6

• For the temperature, we need K1 and K2. K2 is


given, so we need to calculate K1.

1 1 1 1
Fgrain  u   r  t  t  K1    r  t  t  K1   r  t
2 t 2 2
1
3.0510 N  K1  10 1.32106 m
1

2
3 N
K1  46.2 10
m
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 41
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Grinding – Ex. 1-7

• substituting

1
T  K2  K1   d
t
K m N 1 6
T  0.2  46.2  
 91.4  10 m  640K
N m 1.32 10 m6

T  Tinitial  T  20  640  660C

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 42
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Honing and Superfinishing

Honing tool used to improve


the surface finish of bored or
ground holes.

Schematic
illustrations of the
superfinishing
process for a
cylindrical part.
(a) Cylindrical
mircohoning, (b)
Centerless
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
microhoning.
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Lapping

(a) Schematic illustration of the lapping process. (b)


Production lapping on flat surfaces. (c) Production lapping
on cylindrical surfaces.

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Polishing Using Magnetic
Fields

Schematic illustration of polishing of balls and rollers


using magnetic fields. (a) Magnetic float polishing of
ceramic balls. (b) Magnetic-field-assisted polishing of
rollers. Source: R. Komanduri, M. Doc, and M. Fox.

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Abrasive-Flow Machining
Schematic illustration of
abrasive flow machining to
deburr a turbine impeller.
The arrows indicate
movement of the abrasive
media. Note the special
fixture, which is usually
different for each part
design. Source: Extrude
Hone Corp.

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Robotic Deburring

A deburring operation on a robot-held die-cast


part for an outboard motor housing, using a
grinding wheel. Abrasive belts or flexible
abrasive radial-wheel brushes can also be used
for such operations. Source: Courtesy of
Acme Manufacturing Company and
Manufacturing Engineering Magazine,
Society of Manufacturing Engineers.

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Conformal Hydrodynamic Nanopolishing:
Case-study
Applications Challenges
• Most processes can polish only flat
• Optics
surfaces; concave/profiled surfaces
• Defence & Nuclear are difficult to superfinish
• Electronics • Concave surface on hard brittle
• Industrial materials, such as single crystal
sapphire can not be finished via form
Existing Methods grinding due to process-induced
• Diamond Turning cracks
• Precision Grinding • Diamond turning center can be used
for non ferrous materials but it is a
• Lapping super-precision machine-tool (The
• Ion Beam Polishing equipment cost is ~ 20 crores besides
• Spot Hydrodynamic Polishing the expensive operational cost)
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton 1
Conformal Hydrodynamic
Nanopolishing Process and Machine
Process Description
• Improvement over existing
spot hydrodynamic polishing
methods
• Superfinish hard and brittle
concave surfaces, specially,
sapphire and hardened steels
• Mitigates existing surface
microcracks
• Polishing action due to
elastohydrodynamic film in
the slurry submerged
rotating conformal contact
(silicone ball in the cavitynd
being polished) 12st Generation Conformal Hydrodynamic Nanopolishing Machin
Delivered to Precison Engineering Division BARC
Generation (designed and fabricated in the Machine Tools Lab
at IIT Bombay)
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton 2
Novelty and Technology Breakthrough
• Existing hydrodynamic polishing employs spot polishing unable to
polish small cavities (< 6mm in dia)
– More than 3 degrees of freedom required to polish the entire cavity
effectively
– Small actuation system and polishing tool is required
• Conformal contact has a rotating soft tool which conforms to the shape
of the cavity
• Axis of this tool is inclined at 45˚ and the workpiece is rotated inside a
slurry filled tank which ensures non-zero relative motion between tool
and workpiece at every location in the cavity
• The entire cavity can be polished at once which will be much cheaper
and faster than programming the tool path
• Alternative to expensive Diamond Turning
• Can finish wide range of materials ceramics (sapphire, glass) and
hardened steels
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 3
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Technology Outcomes
• Superfinished surfaces in
steels (< 3nm 3D surface
roughness)
• Crack-free surface of < 100
nm 3D surface roughness in
single crystal sapphire
cavity
• Process knowhow and
machine transferred to
Precision Engineering Nanometric finish on hardened steel
Division, BARC for strategic
applications in a nuclear
device
• The superfinished obtained
at a fraction of cost of
Diamond turning
• It can also be used by gem
polishers which could
reduce the health hazard by
reducing the dust inhalation Crack-free superfinished surface on single
and automation is possible
crystal sapphire cavity
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton 4
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Economics of Grinding and Finishing
Operations

Increase in the cost of


machining and finishing a
part as a function of the
surface finish required.
This is the main reason
that the surface finish
specified on parts should
not be any finer than
necessary for the part to
function properly.
ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II
Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs.
Singh/Melkote/Colton
Summary

• Overview of processes
• Analysis of process
• Example problem

ME 338: Manufacturing Processes II


Instructor: Ramesh Singh; Notes: Profs. 54
Singh/Melkote/Colton

You might also like