Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ship Stability III by Capt Subramaniampdf PDF Free
Ship Stability III by Capt Subramaniampdf PDF Free
Born in Sept. 1942, Capt. H. Subramaniam was educated in the Lawrence School,
Lovedale, one of the best schools in India. He passed out of the T.S. Dufferin in 1960
winning several prizes including 'Runner-up for
the President's Gold Medal' for all round
proficiency. He then served at sea until Aug 1968
when he took to teaching at the L.B.S. Nautical
SHIP STABILITY · III
& Eng. College, Bombay. In Dec 1990, he took
over charge as the Principal of the same college.
In Nov 1991, he was transferred to command
the T.S. Rajendra which conducted three-year
B.Sc. (Nautical Sciences) degree courses,
approved by Bombay University, for pre-sea
cadets. In July 1992, he did a stint of four months
in command of a bulk carrier from India to Japan,
Australia and back to prove to himself that he
'Practices what he teaches'. In Aug 1993, he was
in charge of the transfer of training from T.S .
Rajendra to a new shore based nautical
academy called T.S. Chanakya. Having
established T.S. Chanakya, he again took over
charge as the Principal of the LBS College, in
May 1995, by then renamed 'L.B.S. College of Advanced Maritime Studies & Research '.
He has thus been associated with ~II the four great maritime training institutions
in Indian hist ry - he was a cadet on T.S. Dufferin, the last Captain Superintendent
of T.S. Rajen la, the first Captain Superintendent of T.S. Chanakya and Principal of
L.B.S. College. He retired from Govt service on 30th September 2002 after 34 glorious
years including ~ 2 years as head of maritime training institutions.
His achieveme1111ts/distinctions includ~
Extra Mastel· certificate (UK); external examiner of Masters and Mates since
NUTSHELL SERIES
1977; member of the 'Extra Masters Examination Board' of India since its inception
ti n 1985; nautical ~ssessor in a formal investigation into a major ship collision; leader
of the Indian delegation to the IMO on two occasions; qualified 'Lead Assessor'
BOOKS
through Lloyds Register's QSM; examiner in two subjects and overall moderator for
Nautical Science degree exams of Bombay University; Chief Examiner of Extra
Masters from Dec. 99 to Dec. 01 ; Chairman of the committee on HRD for In, and
Water Transport, Govt. of India; Member of the Executive Committee governing the
BY · CAPT. H. SUBRAMANIAM
EXTRA MASTER, F.R.Met.S., M.R.I.N., F.N.I., F.C.M.M.I., M.I.Mar.Tech., M.I.Met.S.
Indian Institute of Port Management at Kolkata; Chairman of the Northern Academic
Council of the Govt. of India for the inspection of maritime training institutes; title of
'Principal Emeritus' of LBS College on retirement; 'Man of the year Award' in 2001 by
Sailor Today magazine for his 'Conception and implementation of IN Dos'; 'Lifetime
Achievement Award' in 2002 by Marine World magazine; Chairman of the Nautical
Institute , India (West) Branch ; Master of the Company of Master Mariners of India.
is qualifications, experience and devotion to teaching enable him to put each
su 1)ect in a 'Nutshell'. All his eight books in the Nutshell Series - PRACTICAL
NA IGATION, MARI NE METEOROLOGY, SHIPBORNE RADAR & ARPA, SHIP
STABILITY I, II & Ill , NAUTICAL WATCHKEEPING & SPHERICAL TRIGONOMETRY
have been great successes.
VIJAYA PUBLICATIONS
SHIP STABILITY - Ill
NUTSHELL SERIES
BOOKS
BY
CAPT. H. SUBRAMANIAM
Extra Master, F.R.Met.S., M.R.l.N., F.N.I., F.C.M.M.I., M.l.Mar.Tech., M.l.Met.S.
Principal Emeritus,
L.B.S. College of Advanced Maritime Studies & Research,
Mumbai.
VIJAVA PUBLICATIONS
~ 9122 25217044; e-mail: h_subramaniam@hotmail.com
2 CHAITRA, 550 ELEVENTH ROAD,
CHEMBUR, MUMBAI 400 071.
First edition: Mar 1986
Reprinted:
Sep 1988, Mar 1991, Mar 1995
Aug 1997, Aug 1999, Oct 2000
Aug 2004
Copyright
All rights reserved
Printed and published by Mrs Vijaya Harry for Vijaya Publications of 2 Chaitra,
550 l l 1h Road, Chembur, Mumbai 400 071 at the Book Centre Ltd., 6th Road,
Sion East, Mumbai 400 022.
Capt/Dr.P.S.VANCHISWAR 15th Feb 1986 Stability III deals with the subject
Ph.D., Extra Master at the Master's level. The author ' s
Resident Professor, practical - method of calculating the
World Maritime Universi~y, stability particulars of a ship in a
Malmo, Sweden. damaged condition is unique. His chapter
on stability of ships carrying bulk
grain is certainly what a shipmaster
needs to know. His decision to include
F 0 R E W0 R D chapters on shear force and b~n~ing
moment, in this book on ship stability,
will be welcomed by all students for the
Enthusiasm, perseverance & dedication Certificate of· Competency as Master F.G.
are the qualities that come to my mind The author's expertise in teaching is
when I think of Captain H. Subramaniam. clearly evident in thi~ book.
Enthusiasm because of the way in which
he goes about, not only his work, but I con~tatulate the author for his
also his 'hobby' of writing technical efforts and hope that he will continue
books! Perseverance because of his to write on other maritime subjects.
starting to write the next book as soon
the earlier one is complete, thereby
writing six books in less than ten
years! Dedication to his work because he
does not let his book writing interfere
Q'J~~
(P.S.Vanchiswar)*
with his main occupation - teaching. In
fact, I have heard from those who have
had the good fortune to have been his
students, that his dedication to
teaching is total.
CONTENTS
The subject of Ship Stability has been
covered in three parts:
Chapter Page
Ship Stability I (Nutshell Series Book
4) consists of 18 chapters and adequately 33 Bilging of an end compartment. 1
covers the syllabuses for Second Mate Exercise 31.
F . G & Navigational Watch Keeping Officer.
34 Bilging of an intermediate 20
Ship Stability II (Nutshell Series compartment. Exercise 32.
book 5) starts with chapter 19 and goes
on to chapter 32 such that both, Ship 35 'Bilging of a side compartment. 33
S~ability I and II, cover the syllabuses Exercise 33.
, for First Mate F.G & Mate H. T.
36 Bilging - Practical shipboard 44
Ship Stability III (Nutshell Series calculations. Exercise 34.
Book 6) starts with chapter -'33 and goes
on to chapter 49 such that all three, 37 Calculation of list by GZ curve. 64
Ship Stability I, II and III, cover more Exercise 35.
than the syllabuses for Master F,G. apd
Master Home Trade. 38 Angle of loll by GZ curve. 75
Exercise 36.
As far as possible, a practical
approach has been maintained to enable 39 List when initial GM is zero. 80
ship's officers to put the knowledge to
practical use on board ship. 40 - Dynamical stability. Stability 84
requirements under Loadline
It is hoped that Marine Engineers also Rules. Exercise 37.
may find these books useful.
41 Effect of beam and freeboard 94
on stability.
48 SF and BM in box-shaped vessels. 171 The increase in draft, and the effect
Exercise 41. on GM, resulting from bilging an end
compartment is the same as that caused
49 SF and BM in ships. 188 by bilging an amidships compartment of
similar dimensions. Since the student is
Answers to exercises ••••••••••••••• 194 expected to have studied the effects of
bilging amidships compartments in
Appendices Chapter 32 in Ship Stability II,
needless repetition has been avoided
I Hydrostatic table - m.v.VIJAY 204 here.
The bilging of an end compartment
II KN Table - m.v.VIJAY 205 causes the COB of the ship to be
longitudinally displaced away from the
III Hydrostatic table - m.v.VICTQRY 206 bilged compartment. Since the position
of the COG of the ship remains
IV . Cross curves - m.v.VICTORY 207 unaffected by bilging, the consequent
longitudinal s~aration of the COB and
V Table of heeling moments the COG (i.e., BG) results in a trimming
cargo of bulk grain - m.v.VIJAY 208 moment (W.BG). Bilging an end comp-
artment, therefore, causes a change in
VI Grain loading diagram - the trim of the ship.
No: 3 LH and TD - m.v.VIJAY 209 The foregoing statement can be
illustrated simply by the worked
VII KN table for loading bulk grain examples that follow. However, before
- m.v.VIJAY 210 proceeding with the worked examples, it
is necessary to know the theorem of
parallel axes as applicable to
rectangles. The theorem of parallel axes
-oOo- with respect to other regular shapes is
explained in qhapter 41, · before the
worked examples on centre of pressure.
2 3
Th~orem of parallel axes: If I*GG is the Example l
moment of inertia of an area about an
axis passing through its geometric A box-shaped vessel 100 m long & 12 m
centre, and ZZ is an axis parallel to wide floats at an even keel draft of 6 m
GG, then in SW . The compartment at t~e forward
end, 10 m long and 12 m broad, is empty.
I*ZZ = I*GG + Ay2 Find the new drafts fwd and aft if this
compartment gets bilged.
where 'y' is the distance between the
axis GG and the axis ZZ.
Plan view at waterline
Case l
If L
y =
10m, . '8=6m&
12 m, I*ZZ = ?
G z ~----9,0: i,---~1} '
I*ZZ = I*GG + Ay 2
I0 m
r t•~t---12 m A
11
11
I0 m
l 5-+-m~-
11
Side elevation
11
= 180 + 8640
..__+-
8820 m 4 •
G z
d
Case 2
15 ml
If L = 8 m, B = 4 m & I I
+--4m~
y = 1 m, I *ZZ = ?
Before bilging, AB = AG = AF = 50 m.
I*ZZ = I*GG + Ay 2
r
8 m
V x 6 = 7200 m 3 ) unchanged by
= 100 x 12
W = 7200 x 1.025 = 7380 t ) bilging.
= BL3+ LB(y 2) '
TI G G
z
S = volume of lost bouyancy
z intact water-plane area
= 170.667 + 32
Since the COG is fwd of the new COB, the No te: If the transver.s e GM in the bilg.e·d
trim caused will be by the head. c o nditi o n is asked, the method of
-
TM = W.BG = 7380 x 5 = 36900 tm by head.
c alculation is the same as that in
Chapter 32, in Ship. Stability I I .
s = 0. 250 me<tre.
MCTC = W.BML = 7380(101.25) = 74.723 tm.
100L 100(100) New hydraft 6.000 + 0.250 = 6.250 m.
Tc =TM 7 MCTC= 36900 7 74.723 ~ 493.8 cm Note 1: The new ~OB will be the geo-
metric centre of the combined volume of
Tc = 4.938 m by the head. the rectangle 90 m long and the carg o
imme~sed in the bilged compartment. AB
Ta = AF(Tc) = 45(4.938) = 2.222 m. is not 45 mas was in example 1.
L 100
Note 2: Sinc e the water-plane is
6 T
Rectangle(its AB) =
fl F 90(12)6.25(45) = 6750(45) = 303 7 50 m 4.
•I •I bc
Submerged cargo(its AB)=
I I I (72 x 6.25)95 = 450(95) 42750
~~~~-;-;-~~-1L~~
I I
Total volume(its AB) = 4
7200(new AB) . . . . . . . . . . . . = 346500 m •
A I I
Cargo New AB = 346500 7 7200 = 48.125 metres.
Side elevation In this case, new AF also = 48.125 m.
Alternative 2
I5 m
B' F 1: F I
135 m
B1
t
20 m
Volume regained (its AB) =
300 x 75 ••••••••..•••• + 22,500 m
4
•
11
11
II
! New volume (new AB) = 4
24000 x new AB ••••..•• = 1,820,250 m •
A
11 New AB = 1,820,250 ~ 24000 = 75.844 m.
II
Side
.. elevation II BG = new AB - AG = 75.844 - 75 = 0.844 m
100
If in example 3, the bilging occurred in 12.649 m.
the LH (full of general cargo: p = 60%) be = b J100 - E = 2q/0:4 =
and not in the DB tank, find the new 100
drafts fwd and aft. 2
Area of cargo = 9.487 x 12.649 = 120 m •
Plan view at waterline
To find new AF, moments of area about A:
i
20 m i
F GBF ).Bl 20 m
J 1•
LL..L.L..LLJ.---=-.-r---
I 1I !
I*COF rect = 20(135 3 ) + (20)135(3.191 2) I'
12 Side elevation II
I
= 4128117.698 m4. I1
I*COF cargo area = II
12.649(9.4873) + 120(71.8092) I
12
= 619683.937 m4. s
I*COF lntact WP area = 4747801.635 m 4 • d
INTERMEDIATE CO~PARTMENT
Before bilging, AB
= 7380 t
= AG =
) bilging.
AF = 50 metres
I*COF large rect =
3
12(80 )+(12)80(6.1112 )=547,850 .548 m4. S = · volume of lost buoyancy
12 intact water-plane area
I*COF small rect = s = 10(12)6\65/100) = 468 = 0.417 m.
l?.(10 3)+120(48.8892) = 287,816.119 m4. 1200 - 120(65/100) 1122
12
New hydraft = 6.000 + 0.417 = 6.417 m.
I*COF int~ct WP •••••••= 835 I 6 66.667 m 4•
f 12 m
P lan view at waterline
~---_..;.._~'...L..L..L.+----f J .
----------80 m --------- 10 m 10 m
i
12 m
Side elevation
l
<.- - - - - 4 7 • 5 6 7 . m- - - -:>1(; - - 4 7 • 4 3 3 m - ~I 5 r.i
f
20 m
If in example 3, the permeability of the
hold was 60%, find the new drafts, fwd &
aft, after bilging.
~___..____,____~-f---".--1
· 120 20 40
J.
m-- - - --- -- - m m The following particulars, already cal-
culated in example 3, are unchanged by
I*COF intact WP = bilging: - V = 25,920 m 3 , W = 26,568 t,
I*CCF large rect + I*COF small rect. AG = 85.833 metres.
I*COF intact WP •• • ••• = 8986 , 666 . 667 m 4. New hydraft = 7 .2 00 + 0 . 514 = 7 . 714 m.
New BG = 1.310 m.
Tc TM 34804.08 = 65.7 cm o. 6 57 m
Since AG < new AB, MCTC 529.434
Tc will be by stern .
TM = W.BG = 26568 x 1.310 = 34,804.08 tm Ta = AF{Tc~ = 87.143{0.657) = 0.318 m.
L 180
Tc = -'lli.. ci'na MCTC = W.GML or W.BML
-
MCTC lOOL lOOL
Tf = Tc Ta = 0.657 - 0.318 = 0 . 339 m.
BML = I*COF intact WP Volume of displ.
Fwd Aft
I*COF intact WP area = I*COF large rect Final hydraft 7.714 m 7.714 m
+ I*COF small rect + Tf or Ta -0.339 +0 . 318
I *COF cargo area
Final drafts 7 . 375 m 8.03 2 m
32
33
E xerc i se 32
Bi l ging an i~termediate c o mpa rtment ~ HA P'I J;;.R 35
Example 1
L2
A vessel 200 m long & 20 m wide is box-
shaped and afloat in SW at an even keel
draft of 8 m. A DB tank on the starboard
w1 L1
side is rectangular, 12 m long, 10 m
w L wid e, 1.2 m deep & empty. Calculate the
list if this tank is now bilged, given
that KG = 7.5 rn and FSM = 820 tm.
81 '
' 8
v = 200 x 20 x 8 = 32000 m 3) ·Unchanged
w = 32000 x 1.0 25 = 32800 t ) by bilging
K E E L
c
..... = volume of lost buoyancy
intact water-plane area
New KB = new hydraft ~ 2 = 3.830 metres. KMT =KB+ BMT = 3.830 + 2.739 = 6.569 m
Total area (its dist) area lost (its GM fluid or GMF ••••••••••••••• = 1.015 m
distance) = balance area (its distance).
Tan ~ = BB1 = 0.128 = 0.12611
2880 x 8 - 60 x 2 = 2820(its distance) GMF 1.015
V 150 x 17 x 8 = 20400 m3) Unchanged After bilging & parallel sinkage, the
w = 20400 x 1.000 = 20400 t) by bilging area of the water-plane is constant at
all drafts. So F1 & Bi will be in the
S = volume of lost buoyancy same vertical line and the new KB will
intact water-plane area be half the new draft. New KB = 4.132 m.
1j100-p = 16/0."4" = 10.119 metres. Dist of Fl from stbd side = 8.640 metres
100
FF1 = 8.640 - 8.500 = 0.140 metre.
Breadth of cargo = be =
w2 \,.-i+-11-----------8----~r 7, Fwd
Final hydraft 5.000 m
Aft
5.000 m
I~
.~~c=J~·
----71
--+--~/
60 m
Ta or Tf -0.144 m
Final drafts 4. 8 56 m
+0.153 m
5.153 m.
I,..::------ 7 2 • 0 14
Example 3
Find the drafts, fwd & aft, in example 1 . -e- = 2.236° or 2° 14' to starboard.
Note 1: BM= I ~ V or I = BM(V). I*CL & Intact vol at 6.289 m draft, in FW, (its
I*COF have been obtained by multiplying AB) - vol lost(its AB) =new vol(its AB.)
BMT & BML by the volume of displacement
at 6.289 m draft in FW with the hull 12465.4(71.928) - 396(100) = 12069.4(AB)
considered to be intact.
New AB = 71.007 metres.
Note 2: The above values of I hold good
for the bilged condition also as they
depend only on the shape and area of the Exercise 34
intact water-plane, corresponding to Bilging DB tank - actual ship
W2 L2 in the foregoing figure.
l M.v.VIJAY is afloat in DW of RD 1.015
In the bilged condition, volume of dis- drawing 4.6 m fwd and 5.8 m aft. A DB
placement= 12069.4 m3. tank 20 m long, 18 m wide and 1.2 m
deep has AG = 90 m and is empty. If
New BMT = I*CL 7 V = 4.963 metres. this tank now gets bilged, find the
hydrostatic particulars referring to
KMT = n e w KB + new BMT = 3.446 + 4.963 appendix I of this book.
54 55
2 In question 1, find the drafts fwd & · 135 m, KG 4 m) gets bilged. Sine~ the ·
aft after bilging. ~op of this tahk was below the orig-
inal water line, _the ship's water-
3 If in question 2, KG = 8 m, FSM = plane area is not adversely affected.
1200 tm, and a weight of 50 t is Referring to Appendix I of this book,
shifted 10 m to ~ stbd, find the list. find i) the new hydrostatic partic-
ulars & ii) the . new drafts fwd & ~ aft.
4 M.v.VIJAY i s in SW drawing 6.0 m fwd
& 5.0 m aft. A DB tank of AG 20 m, 21 PART B - Bilging of a cargo 'hold.
m long, 16 m wide and 1 m deep, has
HFO of RD 0.95 in it to a sounding of Stability calculations, after a cargo
0.40 m. Calculate the hydrostatic hold gets bilged, are complex & tedious.
particulars, referring to appendix I Such ealculations are not always
of this book, if this tank now gets solvable on board owing to the limit-
bilged. Note: As usual on ships, ations of the information available to
assume that the KG of this tank = 5 m the shipmaster. However; an idea of the
.regard less of the sounding. possible calculations that can be made,
to a fair amount of accuracy, is given
5 In question 4, find the new drafts here in the following worked examples.
fwd and aft after bilging.
Though an empty hold has been bilged,
6 If in question 5, KG = 7.5 m and ~SM in the worked examples that follow, the
before bilging was 8500 tm, find the student who has studied the earlier
list when a weight of 80 t is shifted chapters on bilging, should be able to
10 m to port. solvb similar such problems even when
the bi : ged compartment has cargo in it.
7 M.v.VTJAY is in SW at an even keel
draft of 4.6 m. A DB tank 20 m long, Example S
10 m wide and 1.2 m deep is full of
SW ballast. The AG of the tank is 100 M.v.Vijay is afloat in SW at drafts of
m. Find the new hydrostatic parti- 4.11 m fwd & 5.11 m aft. No 2 LH, AG 104
culars if this tank gets bilged, m, is 20 m long, 18 rn wide & empty. No 2
referring to appendix I of this book. DB tank, one metre deep, is situated
directly below No 2 LH. While corning
8 In question 7, find the new drafts alongside, a tug collides with this ship
fwd and aft. causing No 2 LH to get bilged above the
level of the tank top. Calculate the
9 M.v.VIJAY, at 6 m even ke~l draft in hydrostatic particulars after the
sw, collides with a barge. The fore accident, assuming that No 2 LH is
peak tank, full with 102 t of FW (AG r.ectangula r.
56. 57
F~d 4.11 m, aft 5.11 m, trim one metre excess of 5.204 m draft will be very
by stern, Mean 4.61 m, AF = 72.011 m small, the water-plane area may be
considered to be constant.
Correction = AF (trim) = 0.51 m.
L From hydrostatic table, considering the
h u 11 to be intact:
Initial hydraft = 5.11 0.51 = 4.6 m.
TPC at 5.204 m draft = 22.142.
W = 9013 t, vol of displ = 8793.171 m3 •
vol lost= 20(18)(4.&-l) = 1296 m3. TPC = l.025A or A = 22.142(100)
Sum of the two volumes = 10089.171 m3 • 100 1.025
If the hull was intact and the vol- -WP area at 5.204 m draft = 2160 .1 95 m2.
ume . of displacement was 10089.171 m3, w Area lost in No 2 LH = 360 rn 2.
would have been 10341.4 t and the draft, Intact water-plane area = 1800.195 rn2.
as per hydrostatic table, would have
been 5.204 metres. Sinkage in excess of 5.204 rn draft
= 58456.089
111 I
- 20(18 3) = 48736.089 m 4. I*COE\1 intact WP = I*COF - Ah2
12
= 2074151.633 - 1804.878(6.425 2 )
BMT = I = 48736.089 = 5.542 metres
4
v 8793.171 = 1999645.142 m •
I*COF1 entire WP = -I*COF + Ah 2 KML =new KB+ new BML = 2.799 + 227.409
Fwd Aft
Final hydraft 5.325 m 5. 3 25 m
Tf or Ta +l.267 m -1.10.9 m
Final drafts 6.592 m 4.216 m
Example 7
If ~ in example 6, 150 t of FW is
CHAPTER 37 Origin of the formula:
MI
CALCULATION OF
LIST BY GZ CURVE
If the COG of the ' ship i s now ·Shifted Hence the upsetting arm curve may be
transversely from G to G1, parallel to drawn as follows:
the keel , and the vertica J. through G,1
cuts GZ at Y: angle Y = 90 °, ~~gle YGG1 GG1 is . laid off upwards from the 0° heel
= angle of heel = -f:t- & GY = GGi (Cos {1.). position on the x-axis, arriving at a
Since GY is the reduction of GZ due to point call~d X. 0.8(GG1) is laid off
transverse shift of COG, the formula may upwards from the 40° heel position on
be stated as: the x-axis, arriving at Y. Points X and
Y are joined by a straight line which
Red of GZ or upsetting lever GG1 .Cos ~ represents the upsetting lever at any
angle of heel upto about 30°. The angle
This upsetting lever may be allowed of heel at which the righting arm curve
for in either of two ways: (GZ curve) and the upsetting arm curve
(line XY .) intersect, is the list.
Method l
Method 2
The curve of statical stability is
drawn, as usual, for the final fluid KG The curve of statical stability is drawn
of the ship, as shown in chapters 23 and only after the value of GZ, at each
24 (Ship Stability II). The GG~ is angle of heel, is reduced by GG1(Cos ~).
calculated by the formula GG1 = dw/W. The GZ at 0° heel wou ld nece ssarily be
negative. The angle of heel at which the
If GG1(cos B) is plotted for values of~ modified GZ curv~ cuts the x-axis is the
from 0° to 40°, it will be noticed that angle of list.
this curve very nearly coincides with a
straight line drawn from GG1 at 0° heel Example l
to 0.8(GG1) at 40° heel, as illustrated
in the following figure wherein GG1 is M.v.VIJAY is in SW displacing 13000 t.
assumed to be 1.000 m. Hence GG1 Cos B KG = 7.788 m, FSM = 1372 tm. A tracto~
at 0° = 1.000, at 10° = 0.985, at 20° = weighing 50 t is to be shifted 10 m to
0.940, at 30° = 0.866 & at 40° = 0.766 ~ starboard . Calculate the resultant list.
u
UJ
0
E E E E E
0
r
E
Fluid KG
KM (appendix I )
=
=
7 .894
8.139
m
m
0 Lr\ 0
'° '°
18 7.
rl
0
0
00
Q"\
.
~
Q"\
0
. .
'°
00
0
'°
r--. 00
0 0
Initial fluid GM = 0.245 m
0 ... Note: Though the normal practice is to
0 10 20 30 40 subtract FSC from the solid GM in order
68 69
to obtain the fluid GM, the above change a perpendicular is erected at 57.3° heel
in procedure has been adopted for and the initial fluid Gr' laid off t.:.pward
convenience, in this case, because the
fluid KG may be required, later on, in Initial fluid GM
case the the list by formula e~ceeds 5°.
N
r-
.
0. 245m . LO
....
c:
w
entire curve of statical stability just 2
w
to compute the value of list. 0
N :::i:
Method 1
0.7 Ot--~-'-~~~---'~~""-~~5=--~~~~~~~~~---.t-
10
E H E E L in degrees
<D
<D
CX)
LIST 4. 5° to port
0
I
0.5 :E 0
(.!) LIST = 4 t o port.
.....
" =>
.......
4-
.......
.....
"' - 0.15
0.3 ......
.....
c:
>--<
Exercise 35
List by GZ cur~e
y
1 M.v.VIJAY is in a SW dock, displacing
12575 t: KG 7.6 m: FSM 1372 tm.
Calculate the list, to the nearest
o"'-~5~~1~
0~~--'-20~~~3~0~~-,-4~0~~-.~50:----=5='7.3
degree, if a 125 t locomotive is
loaded on the upper deck (KG 16 m)
HE E L 1n degrees
6 m to starboard of the centre line.
74
2 75
M.v.VIJAY has W = 8000 t, KG= 7.354
metres, FSM = 1082 tm. The following CHAPTER 38
transverse shiftings were done:
-oOo- Heel 0 5 10 15 20
KN (m) 0 0.756 1 . 501 2.227 2 . 974
76 77
He el 25 30 40 45 60
KN ( m) 3. 699 6
4.393 5.647 6.134 7.165
Find, to the nearest degree, C/J
""
the angle Q)
of loll by: ( i ) formula & (ii) GZ curve. c
c
0 l/")
.w CV")
KG s9 l id ......
= 8.690 m KM = 8.250 m Li'\
CV")
F SC = 998/16635 = 0.060 m KB = 4.252 m \0
KG fluid . . .. ..
= 8.750 m BM = 3.998 m
\0
.-I
KM . . . . . . ... .
. . = 8.250 m 0
GM fl u id ..... .
= 0 . 50 0 m 3
CV")
~
Tan e- = = 0 .500 1 3 l/")
BM --t N
0
l/")
,...__
e-- by formula 26.5 7 ° i • e • / 27° ans ( i ) •
""
N
0
.e- KN KG S in -e GZ L H
N
~
H
0
~ H
0 0 0 - 0 H
5 0.7 56 0. 7 6 3 -0. 0 07 > . ~
0
10
15
l. 5 0 1 l . 519 -0.0 18 :> . Q)
l/")
,...-l
2.22 7 2.265 -0. 0 38 L H
00
20 2.974 2.993 -0.019 c
<(
25 3.699 3.698 +0.001
30 4.393 4.375 +0.018
40 5.647 5.624 0
+0.023 .-I
45 6 .134 6.187 -0.053
60 7 . 165 7. 578 -0.413 m
.-I
From the curve on the following page , Cl)
the angle of 1011 · = 24.75°. H
""
0. CV") N .-I .-I N CV")
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Answer (ii) = 25°. Ctl
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w + + + I I I I
-oOo-
78 79
Heel 20 - 30 40 60°
KN 2.974 4.459 5.799 7.330 m
GG1 = BM Tan 3 B-
2
or Tan B = 1iffi
However, this formula is based on the
'Wall sided formula' and is1 as such,
subject to its limitations.
KN KG Sin -& = GZ
CHAPTER 40 -e KN KGSin e- GZ
0 0 0 0
DYNAMICAL 5 0.796 0.549 0.247
10 1. 57 5 1.094 0.481
STABILITY 20 3.112 2 .154 o. 958
30 4.641 3.149 1.492
45 6.546 4.453 2.093
60 7.615 5.454 2.161
Dynamical stability, at any angle of 75 7.923 6.083 1.840 m
heel, is the work done in heeling the
ship to that angle. It is expressed in From the curve of statical stability _on
tonne-metre-radians. It is the product the next page:
of the displacement of the ship and the
area under the curve of statical Heel GZ SM Product
stability upto the angle of heel for for area
which it is desired to calculate the
dynamical stability. 0 0 l 0
It may be possible to calculate the 5 0 . 247 4 0.988
area under the curve directly from the 10 0.481 2 0 . 962
GZ values, without actually drawiQg the 15 0 . 725 4 2 . 900
GZ curve, provided sufficient values of 20 0 . 958 2 1 . 916
GZ are available, at constant intervals 25 1. 225 4 4.900
of heel, for the application of 30 1.492 2 2.984
Simpson's Rules. However, if the given 35 1.800 4 7.200
intervals of heel are unsuitable - too 40 1. 97 5 1 1. 97 5
few or irregular - the curve of statica l SOP 23 . 825
stability would have to be drawn and the
values of GZ read off at the desired Area upto 40° = 5(23.825) metre - degrees
intervals of heel. 3 ·
~
from the curve of statical stability
drawn for example 1.
N
c.!l Heel GZ SM Prod for area
E
0 1 0
N
N
. 0
5
0
0. 24 7 4 0.988
~
~ II 10 0.481 2 0.962
4 2.900
~ N 15 0.725
.:> c.!l 0
N 20 0. 958 2 1. 916
E
. ~ 25 1. 225 4 4.900
1.492
30 1.492 1
,...,.~ SOP 13.158
Q) 0
rl M OR
J Heel
30
GZ
1.492
SM
1
Prod for area
1.492
0
,..., 35 1.800 4 7. 200
0
N
1.975 1 _l_. 97 5
40
SOP 10.667
GZ in metres
I 88
I 89
SOP oo to 40° heel = 23.825
SOP 30° to 40° heel = 10.667 The angle of flooding is that angle
SOP oo to 30° heel = 13.158 of heel at which any non-watertight
openings in the hull would immerse.
Area up to 3b 0
= 2_( 13 .158) metre-degrees Small openings through which progressive
3 flooding cannot take place are excluded.
The angle of flooding is usually well
= 5(13.158) -metre-radians over 40°. If it is les~ than 40°, it
3(57.3) would be clear~y stated in the ship's
stability information booklet supplied
Dynamical stability at 30° by the shipyard.
In most ships, the non-watertight
= 15400 x 5 x 13.158 openings that would imme~se first, as a
3 x 57.3 result of heel, would be the hatch
coamings. Hatch covers are weathertight,
= 5893.927 tonne-metre-radians not __ watertight. Coami ngs of cowl type
ventilators, whose tops are likely to
Note: A less accurate result would be immerse before the hatch coamings, are
obtained by using a common interval of usually provided with metal/wooden lids
10°, and applying Simpson's Second Rule, and canvas covers which may be put on,
giving an answer of 5854.620 tonne- after unsQipping the cowls, to prevent
metre-radians. progressive flooding.
Some shipyards state the value o.f tl}e
angle of flooding in the GZ or KN tables
STABILITY REQUIREMENTS AS PER LOADLINE against the displacement of the ship. An
RULES 1968 (UK) AND 1979 (INDIA) idea of the value of the angle of flood-
ing may be obtained by inspecti~g the
1) Initial GM to be not less than 0.15 m cross-sectional drawings of the ship but
2) Maximum GZ to be not less than 0.20 m
3) Max GZ to occur at a heel of not less ( i) The volume- ·. ·of
than 30°. displacement must be
4) The area under the GZ curve, in metre constant at both the
radians, shall be not less than: waterlines:
(a) 0.055 upto 30° heel.
(b) 0.090 upto 40° heel or the angle (ii) Changes in the
of flooding, whichever is less. breadth of the ship
(c) 0.030 between 30° and 40° or the at various points
angle of flooding, whichever is less. along her length,
superstructure, etc
-oOo- would make consider-
able difference.
90
91
_Example 3
..!;_Omplies with the stability requ~rements
Verify whether, in example 1, m.v.VIJAY of the Loadline Rules.
meets all the stability requirements
under the Loadline Rules. The Rules require that the area under
the curve between 30° and 40° or the
1) Solid GM = 8.034 - 6.100 angle of flooding, whichever is less, is
=
FSC = 3050/15400 • • • • • l• • • • =
1.934 m atleast 0.03 mr. In this case, the . area
0.198
Initial GM fluid . .. . . . . . .
= 1. 736
m
m
betwen 30° and the angle of flosuJing
Minimum required .........
Requiremen·t ( 1 ) is satisfied.
= 0 .150 m
(i.e 30°) is zero!
example,
Hence, in this
the ship does NOT satisfy all
the stability requirements under the
2) As per curve drawn in example 1, Loadline Rules. She complies with re-
Maximum GZ 2.200 m quirements 1, 2, 3, 4(a) and 4(b) but
Required vai~~·:··· ;· ····· : not 4(c).
0. 200· m
Requirement (2) f~-~~~f~fle~.
Example 5
3) As .per curve drawn in example 1,
Maximum GZ occurs at - 55° If in example 1, the angle of flooding
Maximum GZ should occ~;·::·~-~r-> 30° was given as 35°, state whether the ship
Requirement (3) is satisfied. meets all the stability requirements
under the Loadline Rules.
4) As calculated in examples l and 2,
(a) A~e~ upto 30° heel .•• = 0.383 Referring to the calculations made in
mr
Minimum required •..•. = 0.055 mr examples 1, 2 & 3, the ship complies
Requirement 4(a) is satisfied. with requirements 1, 2, 3 & 4(a).
( b) Area upto 40° heel ••• = 0.693
mr
Minimum required ••••• = 0.090 mr Requirement 4(b): Area under the curve,
Requirement 4(b) is satisfied. upto the angle of flooding, to be at
( c) Area between 30° & 40° = 0.310 least 0.09 mr.
mr
Minimum required ••••• = 0.030 mr
Requirement 4(c) is satisfied. Heel GZ SM Prod for area
25 1.225 -1 - 1.225
The ship complies with all the stability 30 1.492 +8 +11.936
requirements of the Loadline Rules. 35 1.800 +5 + 9.000
SOP +19 . 711
Example 4
Area 30° - 35° = 5(19.711) metre degrees
If, in example 3, the angle of' flooding 12
was ·given a~ 30°, state whether the ship
= , 0.143 metre radi an s
92 93
Exercise 37
Dynam stability & LL Rules requirements.
Ship A's deck edge immerses at 15° heel. Effect of beam on GZ:-
Ship B has the same breadth as ship A Ship c, having the same freeboard as
but has a greater freeboard. As seen ship A, has greater beam (breadth). For
from the following figure, the GZ values ship-shapes, BM = I/V & for box-shapes,
of ship B are the same as that of ship A 2
it is . simplified as BM= B /12d, as
until 15° - the heel at which A's deck explained in chapter 19 of Ship
edge immerses. On heeling further, the Stability II. Hence the GZ values of
GZ of ship B is greater than that of ship C are greater than those of ship A,
ship A for the same angle of heel. This at all angles of heel.
fact shows up clearly on inspecting
96 97
From appendi x I,
w ( t) draft MCTC tm AB m AF m
SW 10052.6 5.073 166 . 212 72.013 71.887
FW 9807.4 5.073 162.158 72.013 71.887
Tf = Tc Ta = 2 .8 56 - 1 . 466 = 1.390 m
100 101
L- f'c - -x
pressure, may be considered to act. x-
l
Pressure and thrust were explained in I
I
Chapter , 2 in SHIP STABILITY I. I*XX :;:
BL 3
I
Calculation of pressure and thrust on TI I '
curvi - linear, immersed areas was done in y
Chapter 20 in SHIP STABILITY II. It is
presumed that the student has gone
X-;v--X
~B-
through those chapters and, therefo r e,
needless repetition is avoided here.
The depth 'z' of the centre of I*XX :;: Bn3
pressure (COP) below the water surface 36
(WS) may be calculated by the formula:
z == I*ws
Ad
IE-- D--+1
Where:
iT D 4 + fTD 4 = 5 rT D 4
I*ZZ = I*GG + Ad 2 64 16 64
where 'd' is the distance between axis X----- -----X
GG and axis ZZ.
D I
I
Example 1: G I_ _ _ G
1
I*ZZ = I*GG + Ad 2 y
= LB 3 + LB(B/2) 2
12 y ------------y
G
~~-i - .
rD/3
t
- I - - -- G
Worked example 1
x __ L - -- x
bottom of the tank) when the tank has SW
in it to a sounding of 9 metres.
<E-- · 15 m~
= 15(9 3 )+15(9)(4.5 2 )
I~XX = I*GG + Ad 2 = BD 3 + BD( 2 D/ 3 ) 2 = BD3 12
36 2 4 15(9)(4.5) K
104
105
z = Depth of COP below WS = 6.000 m
Sounding ... ... ... ... = 9.000 m Worked example 4
KP (height of COP above bottom) 3~000 m
One bulkhead ~f a tank consists of a
~orked example 2 triangle, apex ' downwards, which is 14 m
broad and 12 m high. Calculate KP
Calculate KP (height of the COP above (height of the COP above the bottom of
the bottom of the tank) in worked the tank) when the saunaing is 9 metres.
example 1, when the sounding is 10 m.
By similar triangles,
breadth of water sur- +--- - 14 rn _ _ ...,..
W +----- 15 m ------;> S face = 10.5 metres.
z = I*ws = I*GG + Ad z 'I'
Ad Ad 5 m A = 10.5(9) = 47.25 m2
..[,
G- - - - . - - - G ,2
= 15(10 3 )+15(10)5 Z 5 t rn
12 J, z = I*ws = I*GG + Ad z
15(10)(5) K Ad Ad
9m
t
4m Alternative method:
J l A
D K E
14 m
By similar triangles, BC = 3.5 metres. w - - -s
Let F & J be the geometric centres of
t riangles ABC & ADE . To calculate the 6 m
posit ~ on of G, the geometric centre of
trapezoid BCED (immersed area) :
'l'
t
Taking moments about A, 3 4.5 m
m 3 m
J i
Area ADE(AJ)-Area ABC(AF)= Area BCED(AG) D 5. 25 m R 3.5 m Q 5. 25 m E
108 109
I*ws BCQR = 3.5(9 3 ) = 850.500 m4 • ~~~
Exercise 38
~~~~~
12 One side of a tank is a vertical Note 1: Problem 6 does not fall into
bulkhead consisting of an isosceles any of the above c~t~gories because the
triangle, 12 m broad & 6 m high, over immersed area is neither rectangular nor
a rectangle 12 m broad & 8 m high. tr ia ngula r.
Calculate the th~ust and . the KP Note 2: Where the tank is more than full
(height of the COP above the bottom) (where ws is above , the top of the tank),
when the tank has salt water in it to the COP is higher than when the tank is
a sounding of 15 metres. just full.
Note 3: COP is always below the geo-
13 Calculate the thrust & KP of the tank metric centre of the immersed area,
in question 12, when the tank has FW regardless of the sounding.
in it to a sounding of 11 metres.
COP OF CURVI-LINEAR SHAPES
14 Calculate the thrust & ~P (heig~t of
the COP above the bottom) of the The position of the COP of a curvi-
v~rtical bulkhead, whose shape is linear shape may be found by using
given below, when run up with SW to a Simpson's Rules. Since it is expected
head of 3 metres (sounding = 7 m). that the student would have already
studied the use of Simpson's Rules to
w s find areas, volumes, first moment and
=
geometric centres, explained in chapter
J2
2 m __ m
2·--
..__~-"--2-,m-J_
20 in Ship Stability II, needless
repetition has been avoided here.
The calculation of the position of
the COP by Simpson's Rules may be done
using either horizontal ordinates or
J2m 2ml vertical ordinates.
O, 3, 5, 6, 5, 3 and 0 m respectively.
= 2(316) = 105.333 m3. Find the KP and the thrust when the hold
3 x 2 is filled with SW td a sounding of 13 m.
1/2 botto~ area = 1(2)50.5 = 37.875 m2. the bottom) and the thrust when the
8 forepeak tank in question 1 is filled
with SW to a sounding of 12 metres.
1/2 1st mom*ws = 1(2)487.3 = 365.475 m 3 •
8 3 Find the KP and the thrust when the
tank in question 1 is run up with DW
1/2 2nd mom*ws =i(2}4843.3= 3632.475 m 4 • (RD 1.015) to a sounding of 8 metres.
8
4 The half-breadths of a watertight
Total 1/2 area = 37+37.875 = 74.875 m 2 . bulkhead, at 2.5 metre vertical
Total half first mom*ws = 548.208 m 3 • intervals from the bottom, are:
Total half second mom*ws = 4583.608 m4 •
1, 2.9, 4.2, 5.1 & 5.7 ,m.
z = I*ws = 2(4583.608) = 8.361 metres.
Ad 2(548.208) Find the KP and the thrust when the
hold is flooded with SW to a sounding
KP = sounding - z = 13 - 8.361 = 4.639 m of 11.5 metres.
7I 4. 8 I 2. 9 5 I 2I 1 • 65 and 1. 3 m.
122 123
main compartments, tanks, store ro oms and 8 . A diagram or table giving the hydro -
accommodation for passengers and crew. static particulars - displacement , TPC,
MCTC, AB, AF, KB, KMT, KML, water-plane
3. The capacity and the position of the areas and transverse cross-sectional
COG (vertical and longitudinal) of every areas for a range of drafts from the
compartment available for cargo, fuel, light waterline to the deepest permiss-
stores and spaces for domestic water, ible waterline. In the case of tables,
feed water and water ballast. In the the tabular interval shall be small
case of a vehicle ferr y, t he KG of •a eno ug h for accurate interpolation . In
compartment sha ll be that estimated for case the ship has a raked keel, the base
the carriage of vehicles and not the line for vertical distances shall be
volumetric centre of the compartment. constant for all the particulars given/
used in calculat i ons, including KG.
4. The estimated weight and position of
the COG (vertical and longitudinal) of: 9. Diagrams or tables to enable the
(a) passengers and their effects and (b) construction of the GZ curve, mentioning
crew and their effects , allowin g for clearly the KG assumed in the given
their distribut io n i n the spac es the y information . The allowance made for the
wo uld normal ly oc cupy, including the stability and buoyancy provided by
h ighest d e c ks to wh i ch they have access. enclosed superstructures must be c learly
st~ted. A s~mple calculation to show how
5. The estimated weight and position of t he GZ curve is to be drawn.
the COG (vertical and longitudinal) of
th e ma ximum quantity of deck cargo that 10. Supplementary information to allow
may reasonably be expected to be carried for the volume of timber deck cargo
on exp o sed decks. If such deck cargo is while drawing the GZ curve.
likely to a bsor b wa t er d u ri ng passage,
the arriva l condition shall allow for 11. Calculation of GM and construction
such increase in weight. In the case of of the GZ curve shall include FSC.
timber deck cargo, the absorption shall
be assumed to be 15% by weight. 12. Complete separate calculations, each
with a profile diagram to scale showing
6. Information to enable calculation of the disposition of the main components
the F SC of each tank in wh ich l i quids of deadweight, under the following
may be carried. A sa mple calculatio n to conditions:
show how the informa tion is to be used.
(a) Light condition - with and without
7. A diagram showing the load line mark permanent ballast, if any.
and load lines with their corresponding
freeb oards . (b) Ballast conditio n - depart ur e port.
130
131
( c) Ballast condition arrival port.
15. A copy ·of the report on the inclin-
ing test and the calculation therefrom,
( d) Loaded condition - departure port. shall be included in the stability
( e ) Loaded booklet. .The inclining test on one ship
condition arrival port. may be acceptable for sister ships also .
( f ) Service condition - departure port.
16. The stability information booklet
must have the approval of the
( g ) Service condition arrival port. government.
In the departure condition, fuel, FW and
consumable stores are to · be assumed
full and in the arrival condition, they
are to be 10% of their capacity.
(4) Capacities and COG (vertical and (b) The intact stability characteristics
longitudinal) of tanks and compartments. of any ship carrying bulk grain shall be
shown to meet, throughout the voyage, at
(5) Curves or tables of grain heeling least the following criteria after
moments for every compartment, filled or t aking into account the he~li ng moments
partly fil led, o r combination ~he 7eof, d ue t o a ssumed shift of g ra in as
incl u ding effects o f temporary fittings. described in Part B:
136
137
(i) The angle of heel due to the assumed
shift o f gra in shall be not greater than In Part B of chapter VI of SOLAS 74,
12°. The Ad ministration granting the the method of calculating the list unde r
document o f author isation under regulat- the assumed conditions of grain shift is
ion 10 may require a lesser angle of il lustrated by a diagram and some
heel if it considers that experience accompanying notes .
shows it to be necessary. (For example,
the permissible angle of heel might be
limited to that at which the deck edge
would immerse in still water.) ~ Residual dynamical stability /{
C\j /
/
(ii) In the statical stability diagram, /
the net ~ or residual area between the
heeling arm curve and the righting arm
curve upto the angle of heel of maximum ~
difference between the ordinates of the
two curves, or 40° or the angle of B
flooding (B-f), whichever is the least, y
shall in all conditions of loading be 'A40
not less than 0.075 metre radians.
0 HEEL in degrees 40 57.3
(iii) The initial fluid GM shall be not
less than 0.30 metre.
the hatch coaming of the upper deck to appendix II but, in accordance with
the surface of the grain) after trimming chapter VI of SOLAS 74, it g ives the KN
level. One curve gives the volume of values at 12° and ~t 40° also.
grain while another curve gives its KG.
For volumetric heeling moment, two The stability calculation, using the
curves are given here one curve for information pr o vided, is illustrated by
loading in the lower hold alone and the the following worked examples:
other for loading in the lower hold and
tween deck in common. When the hold is Example 1
partly filled, if any centre line
division is expected to be fitted to M.v.VIJAY is in SW, loaded down to her
restrict shift of grain, the volumetric marks with grain o f SF 1.5. The KM, for
heeling moment would be considerably the load displacement of 19943 tonnes,
less and hence another pair of curves is 8.704 m. KG= 7.679 m, FSM = 1284 tm.
would be given - one for the lower hold All lower holds and tween decks are full
alone and the other for the lower hold and loaded in common. Using appendices
and tween deck loaded in common. V and VII of this book, verify whether
As per chapter VI of SOLAS 74, the the ship satisfies the requirements of
volumetric heeling moment of a partly Regulation 4 of chapter VI of SOLAS 74,
filled compartment must be multiplied by given that the angle of flooding at the
1.12 to compensate for the vertical rise load displacement is over 40°.
of the COG resulting from the transverse
shift of grain. Hence the value of the
volumetric heeling moment obtained from FSC = FSM/W = 1284/19943 0.064 metre.
the grain loading diagram, in appendix KG solid .... .. . . . . . . . .
. = 7.679 metres
VI of this book, must be multiplied by
1.12 whenever the compartment is partly
KG fluid ............... = 7.743 metres
KM for load displacement = 8. 704 metres
filled. GM fluid . . . .... .. . . ... . = 0.961 metre.
While calculating the volumetric The initial GM fluid > 0 . 3 metre .
heeling moments, in accordance with
chapter VI of SOLAS 74, the shipyard From appendix v, total volume tric heel-
would have assumed a shift of grain ing moment (common loading of all LH and
surface to be: 15 degrees in filled
TD spac es) = 5414 quadro metres.
compartments; 25 degrees in partly
filled compartments. GG1 = volumetric heeling moment
SF of grain loaded x W
Appendix VII of this book is the KN
table of m.v.VIJAY to be used when = 5414 = 0.181 metre.
loading grain. This is similar t o l . 5 ( 19943)
14 2 143
Approximate calculation:
0
Tan B- = GGi =-
0.181
-- 0.188345 '°
(")
GM 0 . 961 - - - - - --
\ r---
Lf}
B-o
H \
KN KG Sin B- = GZ m >
oo
> \
0 0.000 7.743 Sin 0.000 E
5 0.811 7.743 Sin 50 0.136 \ µ.. i:Q w.,.
0
12 1.925 7.743 Sin 12° 0.315 -;t
c
20 3 .120 7.743 Sin 20° 0 . 472 0
30 4. 47 5 7.743 Sin 30° 0.604 ·rl
.j.J
40 5.608 7.743 Sin 40° 0.631 rO
rl
\
60 7.268 7.743 Sin 60° 0.562 ::J
7.743 0.248 0
75 7. 7 27 Sin 7 5° rl \ (/)
Q) 0
0
-;t
0
(")
0
. N
0
. 0
. 0
0
.
145
144
Sum of the areas = 10.20014 + 0.58625
The residual area may be calculated with 10.78639 metre degrees
a fair amount of accuracy as follows : 0.18824 metre radians
Measure off distance DC, the upsetting This is > 0.075 metre radians.
lever at the computed list, and lay it
off as EF at 40°. In this case, DC= EF The ship in this condition, therefore,
= 0.180 m. BE is the upsetting lever at meets all the requirements of Regulation
40° and so BF= 0.180 - 0.145 = 0.035 m. 4 of chapter VI of SOLAS 1974.
CF = DE = 40 - 6.5 = 33.5 degrees.
Example 2
Area of triangle CFB = (33.5 x 0.035)/2
= 0.58625 metre degrees. M.v.VIJAY is displacing 11943 t in SW.
KG= 7.18 m, FSM = 700 tm. A consignment
The a rea under the curve between CF & FG of 2000 t of bulk grain, SF 1.25, is
may be calculated using Simpson's Rules. offered for shipment. No: 3 is the only
empty hold available. Verify whether the
The residual area required is the sum of ship would meet all the requirements of
the two areas calculated as above. regulation 4 of chapter VI of SOLAS 74
without fitting any shifting boards on
CF may be divided into six equal parts the centre line. Use the relevant
and the seven ordinates measured off. In appendices of this book where necessary.
this case, the interval would be 33.5/6
= 5.583°, starting from 6.5°, and the Volume of g~ain = 2000 x 1.25 = 2500 m 3 •
ordinates would thus be measured off at
6.5, 12.08, 17.67, 23.25, 28.83, 34.42 & Entering the grain loading diagram of
40 degrees. No 3 (appendix VI) with the volume of
grain as 2500 m 3 , the ullage is found to
Station Ordinate SM Area be 5.75 m. Entering the same diagram
degrees metre function with ullage as 5.75 m, the KG of grain
and the volumetric heeling moment are
6 . 50 o. ooo l 0 . 000 found to be 5.15 m and 4275 m4 •
1 2 .0 8 0.135 4 0 . 540
17 . 6 7 0.255 2 0 .5 10 Note: The tween deck hatchway must be
23.25 0.345 4 1.38 0 properly closed and either battened down
28.83 0.410 2 0 . 8 20 or overstowed with suitable cargo so
34.42 0.445 4 1. 780 that the bulk grain in the lower hold
40.00 0.451 l 0 .451 cannot shift into the tween deck space
SOP 5.481 during rolling. If this is not done, the
volumetric heeling moment must be taken
Area = 5.583(5.481) 7 3 = 10.20014 m deg
146 147
from the other curve which is meant for From appendix VI I, righting lever:
common loading. This would give 6950 m4!
ftO KG Sin
KN ft = GZ m
Taking moments by keel for the final KG,
0 0.000 6.939 Sin oo 0.000
11943(7.18) + 2000(5.15) = l3943(New KG) 5 0. 7 93 6.939 Sin 50 0.188
12 1 .892 6.939 Sin 12 ° 0.449
New KG . .... ....... . .. . . .... . = 6.889 m 2o 3 .137 6.939 Sin 20° 0.764
FSC = FSM .
w = 700 13943 . = 0.050 m 30 4.696 6.939 Sin 30° l . 227
Final KG fluid . . . . . . . . . . . . .. = 6.939 m 40 6.011 6.939 Sin 40° l . 551
KM for f 'inal w of 13943 . .... 8.076 m 60 7.722 6.939 Sin 60° l . 713
Final GM fluid . . . .. . . . ... . . . 1.137 m 75 8.001 6.939 Sin 7 5° 1.298
The initial Fluid GM > 0.3 metre. Upsetting lever at oo GG1 = 0. 27 5 m
& at 40° = 0.8GG1 = 0.8(0.275) = 0.220 m
Note: The rise of COG, due to transverse
shift of grain in a partly filled The values of the righting arm and the
compartment, is to be compensated for by upsetting arm obtained above, plotted on
multiplying the transverse heeling the next page, illdicate that the list
moment by 1.12 in accordance with caused by the assumed shift of grain
chapter VI of SOLAS 74. would be 6.5° which is well below the
maximum allowed - 12°.
Transverse volumetric heeling ' moment,
from appendix VI, = 4275 quadro metres. From the curves plotted on the next page
it will be seen that:
Volu10etric heeling moment to be used
Maximum difference between the righting
= 4275 x 1.12 = 4788 quadro metres. ·arm and the up-setting arm occurs at
about 55°. The angle of flooding is
GG1 = volumetric heeling moment known to be over 40°. Hence the residual
SF x W area is to be calculated between the
angle of list (i.e., 6.5°) and 40°.
= 4788 0.275 metre
1.25 x 13943 As done in example 1, points A, B, C, D,
E, F and G may be inserted on the graph
Approximate calculation of list: on the next page and the residual area
calculated in two parts and added
Tan e = GG1/GM = 0.275 7 1.137 = 0.2418 6 together.
Sign convention for BM: All clockwise SI Units of BM would be 'Nm' or 'kN m'.
moments to the left, and anti-clockwise
to the right, of the chosen point are Example 1
termed positive. In other words, behdi.ng
moments that tend to cause the bea~ t0 A light beam 8 m long is supported at
sag are considered positive. its ends. If a mass of 10.1937 kg is
placed at its centre, draw the SF and BM
Clockwise moments to the right ·, and diagrams to scale.
an ti ~ c lockwise to the ·1ef t, of the
chosen point are termed negative. In Gravitational force = mass x g
other words, bending moments that tend
to cause the beam to hog are considered = 10.1937(9.81) = 100 N.
negative.
P = SO N Q = SO N
( )
Negative bending moment Since the load is at the centre of the
beam, the reactions (upward) at the ends
Beam tends to hog (forces P and Q in the above figure)
would be equal to 50 N Bach.
1S4
Calculation of SF:
The SF diagram:
Consider point A. To its left, there are The values of SF, calculated for each of
no forces. So the SF ?t A should be
the chosen points, may be graphically
zero. However, at a point just. one mm
depicted and is called the SF diagram:
away from A, the force to its left would
be +SON. So the SF at A may be said . to
be _ changing from ~er9 to +SO N.
Consider point B. The moment of the only At point A, the area uncovered so far =
force to the left, about point B, is + BM at A = zero.
(SO x 1) = SO N m = BM at B.
At point B, the area uncovered so far =
Consider point c. The sum of moments of (SO x l) = 50 N m = BM at B.
all the fqrces to the left, about point
C, is ( 50 x 2) = 100 N m = BM at , c. At. point c, the area uncovered so far =
(SO x 2) = 100 N m = BM at c.
Consider point D. The sum of moments of
all the forces to the left, about point At point D, the area uncovered so far =
D, is (SO x 3) = 150 N m = BM at D. (50 x 3) = lSO N m = BM at D.
Consider point E. The sum of moments of At point · E, the area uncovered so far =
alJ the forces to the left, about point (SO x 4) = 200 N m = BM at E.
E, is (50 x 4) = 200 N m = BM at E.
At point F, the area uncovered so far =
,Consider point F. The sum of moments of (50 x 4) - (SO x 1) = 150 N m = BM at F.
all the forces to the left, about F, is
(SO x 5) - (100 x 1) = 150 N m = BM at ~ At point G, the area uncovered so far =
(SO x 4) - (SO x 2) = 100 N m = BM at G.
Consider point G. The sum of moments of
all the forces to the left, aoout G, is At point H, the area uncovered so far =
(50 x 6) - (100 x 2) = 100 N m = BM at G. (SO x 4) - (50 x 3) = so N m = BM at H.
Consider point H. The sum of moments of At point I I the area uncovered so far =
all the forces to the left, about H, is (SO x 4) - (50 x 4) = 0 N m = BM at I .
(SO x 7) - (100 x 3) = 50 N m = BM at H~
The values of BM at each of the chosen
Consider point I. The sum of moments of points may be expressed, in the form of
all the forces to the left, about I, is a table, as shown below. Commencing from
(50 x 8) - (100 x 4) = 0 N m = BM at I. the left end of the beam, at one metre
intervals, BM in N m is:
Calculation of BM: Method 2:
Point A B C D E F G H I
The BM at any point on the beam is the BM 0 SO 100 150 200 150 100 50 0
area under the SF curve U?to that point.
Cover up the SF diagram with a paper. The values of BM, calculated for each
Keeping its left edge vertical, move it of the__ chosen points , may be graphically
slowly to the right , the r eby uncovering depicted -as illustrated in the following
the SF diagram f r om t h~ l eft . fi g ure:
158 159
P = 80 N Q = 40 N
b-zm~c~ 4m--~I
w x y z
A
l
120 N
B
To fi n d P & Q the reactio ns at each end1 Note: The SF curve c o n s ists of two hori-
moments abo u t poi nt A: z o ntal strai g ht lines . So th e BM c u rve
c o nsists of tw o sl oping st r a i g ht li nes,
( 120 X 2) = (Q X 6) I so Q = 4 0 N.
as mentioned earli e r in this chapter.
163
162
At C, SF = (+2 - 0.8) = +1.2 kN. Tlie
The scale used should be clearly -0.8 kN is the weight o f t h e two-metre
mentioned on the diagrams. In this book,
the scale has sometimes been omitted section AC which acts at B.
intentionally as the diagrams are only
It is now obviou s that f or every 1 metre
to illustrate the nature of the curves
of length, the SF changes by -0.4 kN.
so that the student understands their
construction.
The SF, in kN, at each point would be:
Example 3 A: O & +2; B: +1.6; C: +1.2; D: +0.8;
E: +0.4; F: O; G: -0.4; H: -0.8; I: -1.2
A uniform bar of length 10 m and mass
407.747 kg is supported at its ends. J: -1.6; K: -2 & O.
Draw the SF and BM curves to scale.
p 2 kN Q = 2 kN
t
A
B
'
c D E F G H I J
K
I After drawing the SF curve,
of BM may be computed,
the values
as described
earlier in this chapter, and the results
Calculation of SF obtained, in kN m, would be:
B C D E F G H I J K
At A, SF is changing from 0 to +2 kN. A
1.8 3.2 4.2 4.8 5.0 4.8 4.2 3.2 1.8 0
0
At B, SF = (+2 - 0.4) = +1.6 kN. The The values of BM may now be plotted to
-0.4 kN is the weight of the one-metre scale, and joined toget her , as shown in
section AB, which acts at the mid poin~
of AB, which is to the left of point B. the above diagram.
164 165
Example 4 0 0
1.[)
Force of gravi ty= 6.116(9.81) = 60 kN. ....... N
+ N
I
Load per m run = 60/12 = 5 kN.
00 0
NN '<;)'
I + I
p, 20 kN Q 40 kN
...-! N
I N
t1l I
(!)
B D E F J K L 0 1-lO
....... [I) +.J .......
A c I M I S:: <l.J
O E
I
+J
~ s:: 1.[)
1.[) (!) 0 •
60 kN I S:: +.JN
0 ~ I
....... (!)
·o-i s::
0~00
.......
To find P' 1& Q, the reactions at c & I, ·o-i -
~ 1.[)
moments abb ut point C:
1.[) N
+ I
Note: For this purpose, the entire grav-
itational force is considered to act at u 00 0
point G, the COG of the beam. In the ....... ....... .......
I + I
rest of the problem, the load will be
considered separately per metre run.
1.[)
I N
(Q x 6) (60 x 4) so Q = 40 kN . Cl>
I
....-4
0... 0 0
(P + Q) = 60 so p = 60 40 20 kN. E
m
x
The values of P and Q are inserted in [:Ll
'Following the procedure explained in the Total force · ddwnwa"i'd's =' 9oo···N".: c· ~ ·s? totai
earlier examples, the v~lues of SF and force upwards : also "=' 906 ' N •. ··_He'nce _,'. t'h,e
BM may be calcula~ed f~i a number of reaction at each support =· 450 ' N, · ~-pr~ad
pdints and the diagrams drawn as illust-
over 2 m.
rated in the ~revious page.
Wei.ght/m run in holds: 1 & 4 2 &. 3 · Not e : In the case o( an actual ship 1 the
Ca ego loaded =. .. .. . . 19.8 10.0 t/m weights curve would be very complex and
the load per metre can be deduced at
Barge alone = 164/40 = 4.1 4.1 t/m
Total weight (- ) =.. .. 23.9 14.1 t/m each location only after drawing
weights curve and the buoyancy curve.
the
Buatyancy = +160/40 •• = +19.0 +19.0 t/m
Loatd . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
= -04.9 +04.9 t/m
At any point, SF is the area enclosed by
4 3 2 1
. the loads curve, upto that point.
SF at A= 0. SF at B = -4.9 x 5 = -24.5
198 t 100 t 100 t 198 t tonnes (or -24.5 x 9.81 = -240.345 kN).
Point E F G H I
SF 0 +24.5 +49 +24.5 0
BM -490 -428. 7 5 -245 -61.25 0
24 m
A B c D H
A B C D E F G H I J K L M
Buoyancy/m run = 400 ~ 24 = 16.667 t/m (ii) The air pressure at a nozzle may
be ~oo kN/square metre though the cross
Weight of the empty barge per metre run sectional area of the nozzle may be only
= 112 7 24 = 4.667 t/m a few square ce n t imetre s!
178 f 179
At any point"/ cargo we'ight/m f ·un - ,rv 6 Loads curve of e ·xample i2: · . rl
= volume of 1 m length
(~ t" ~
of ore ~ SF
Buoyancy curve
= 1 x 6 x height of ore cargo +: b.5
Poi~t 1 A B c D N
N
Ore height 1m o.ooo 0 . :333 0.667 1.000 .-1 C() ·..:t ...j- 00 .-1
Ore cargo t/m 0 4 8 12
Barge alone 4.667 4. 667 4.667 4.667 A B c F G H I J K _L M
Total wt t/m 4.667 8.667 12.667 16.667 00 N 00
I .-1 I
Buoyancy t/m , 16.667 16.667 16.667 16.667 I
Load t/m +12 +8 +4 0
. {
Point J K L M
Ore height m 1.000 0.667 0.333 o.ooo Weights curve .
Cargo t/m 12 8 4 0
Barge alone 4.667 4.667 4.667 4.667
Total wt t/m 16.667 12.667 8.667 4.667 Calculating the area under the loads
· Buoyancy t/m 16.667 16.667 16.667 16.667 ' curve, the SF at each point is as under:
Load t/m 0 +4 +8 +12
A: o,
B: 20 ' C : 3 2 I D : 3 6, E: 3 2, F: 20,
1
4 3 2 1
SF
BM 225 t 134 t
216 t
125 t
A B C D E F G H I
At any point,
buoyancy/m = 1 x 5 x draft x 1.025 t/m.
Hold number 4
Point A B c
Draft (metres) 6 5.75 5.5
Bouyancy/m ( +) 30. 7 50 29.469 28.188
Weight t/m ( - ) 31. 87 5 31. 87 5 31. 87 5
Load t/m -1 .125 -2.406 - 3.687
Example 3 Point c D E
Draft (metres) 5.5 5.25 5
A box-shaped barge, 32 m long and 5 m Bouyancy/m ( +) 28.188 26.906 25.625
broad, is empty and afloat on an eve n Weight t/m ( - ) .20. 500 20. 500 20.500
keel. It has a f o ur identical holds and Load t/m +7.688 +6 .406 +5 .125
184
185
Hold number 2
The values of SF at each point:
Point E F G
Draft (metres ·) 5 4.75
Point A B c D
4.5 SF t 0 -7 . .063 -19.250 +8 . 93 8
Bouyancy/m ( +) 25.625 24. 344 23.062
Weight t/m ( - ) 30. 7 50 30. 7 50 30. 7 50
Load t/m E F G H I
-5.125 -6. 406 -7.688 +32 +8.938 -19 . 250 -7.063 0
Hold number l
The SF diagram of example 3:
Point G H ·r
Draft (metres) 4.5 4.25 4
Bouyancy/m ( +) 23.062 21.781 20 . 5
Weight t/m ( - ) 19.375 19.375 19.375
Load t/m +3. 68 7 +2.406 +l.125
A B C E F G H I
A B c D E
Point A B c D
BM tm 0 -12.418 -63 . 336 - 81. 8 7 6
We i ght s
curve E F . G H I
0 +81.876 +63.336 +12 . 4~8 0
~lEz~bt~{jzg~/
up on a . 'per metre basis' along the
ship's length. This was a very tedious
and time consuming process until the
~dvent of comput~rs. The weight of all
variable fa~ tors such as cargo, fuel,
stores, etc are then similarly dealt
with but sepafately so that future
changes in their values can be allowed
f6r simply. The weights curve is then Still water buoyancy curve
drawn, to scale, using the LOA as the
base line •. The wate rl ine at the proposed drafts fwd
& aft is drawn as a straight ~ine on the
The buoyancy curve ships profile containing the Bonjean
Curves and the transverse cross section~
The use of Bonjean Curves (explained al area, of the immersed p~rt of the
later in this chapter) s).mpli fies the hull, ·. nt each stad.on, is obtained. One
procedure of calcul~ting the values of Bonjea~ Curve, on a +arger scale, is
190 191
shown below. The desired waterline cuts explained in chapters 47 and 48, the
the station at a draft of 3.5 m. Hori- resultant load on the ship should be
zontal distance 'x', read off the scale zero - the area enclosed by the loads
of the drawing, is the transverse cross curve above and below the base line
sectional area of the immersed part of should be equal.
the hull at that station.
The SF & BM curves
4
The values of SF and BM are computed for
various locations, as done in chapters
3 47 and 48, and the SF and BM curves are
drawn to scale.
2
Wave conditions
despite the sagging or hogging condition values 6f SF & BM, t o allow for further
being considered, the total under water stresses resulting from wave action.
volume of the ship (volume of bouyancy)
is constant as shown below: Sample calculations are ma de by the
shipyard, and supplied t o the ship, for
Sagging condition: the various · departure a nd a rrival
c o nditions simil a r to those found in the
stability pa rticulais book of the ship .
Clearly mentioned therein wo uld be any
special stress related precauti o ns or
restrictions - for examp le: in a partly
loaded sea going conditi o n, whether a
particular hold should not be left
Hogging condition: empty; under full load, whether jump
loading is p ermitted and, if so, which
alternate holds may be left empty, etc.
In conclusion
(ii ) Final drafts forward 6.005 m·, Vessel meets all the requirements.
aft 5.997 m.
Dyn stab at 40° heel = 77881. 617 tmr.
5 (i ) 20° (ii) 24° Vessel meets all the require men ts.
198 199
· c D E
Exercise 41 (page 186) 4 A B
-25 -40 -45 -40
SF 0
1 -93.3 -180 -266.7
A B c D E F G BM 0 -26.7
SF 0 4.5 9 13.5 9 4.5 0
G H I
BM 0 6. 7 5 27 60.75 94.5 114.75 121.5 F
0 25 40
SF -25
H -333.3 -360 -333.3 -266.7
I J K L M BM
SF - 4.5 -~ -13.5 -9 -4.5 0 M
BM 114. 7 5 K L
94. 5 60.75 27 6. 7 5 0 J
0
45 40 25
SF 0
SF - all straight lines. BM is curved. -180 -93.3 -26.7
BM
curved.
Both, SF line and BM line, are
2 A B c D E F G
SF 0 1$ 36 54 72 0 -72
BM 0 18 72 162 288 c D E F.. G
360 288 1;::·
.J Pl B
~'.1 0 (lj
H I J K L M N f.:lF ~'.i 10 0 ·-·· 10
SF -144 -216 -108 0 108 216 144 BM i{j 1 :::; . ~:;:5 4 :2t:). 6 68 1 ~:;. ::::::::;4 w Q) 0
BM 72 -288 -612 -720 -612 -288 72
J K L. M
H I
0 p Q R s T u
SF 72 0 -72 -54 -36 -18 0 --10
bF 0 IZi 10
BM 288 360 288 162 • 72 18 0
13 . :::;;:::;A 26 . 668 13 . 3 3 4 0
BM (;'.) ((j
SF . - all straight lines. BM is curved.
Both , ~;F 1 i ne anc:I 0~1
'-" line , are c ur v ed .
3 A B c D E F
~ SF 0 300 600 150 -300 0
BM 0 1500 6000 9750 9000 7500
G H I J K
SF 300 -~50 -600 -300 0
BM 9000 9750 6000 1500 0
d W sw TPC fvCTC HB HF KB ™r ~
. 00
0
11.00 70941 68.58 1083.0 5.37F 1.96F 5.64 13.24 366 (/)
~
11.20 72315 68.74 1091.3 5.30F 1.72F 5.75 13.22 362
11.40 73693 68.91 1099.5 5.23F 1.47F 5.85 13.20 358
~
u
H
>
~ 0
11.60 75074 69.07 1107.8 5.16F 1.22F 5.95 13.18 354 . • r--.
>. ~
11.80 76458 69.24 1115.9 5.09F 0.98F 6.06 13.17 351 :E
I (fJ
.
12.00 77845 69.40 1124.0 5.02F 0.74F 6.16 13.16 347 I (j)
~
H 0
.w . '°
12.20 79237 69.56 1131.3 4.94F 0.53F 6.26 13.16 343 ~ ~ (/)
s8
1-1
12.40 80633 69.72 1138.4 4.87F 0.32F 6.37 13.16 340 ,_:i
H
0
.
~
0.....,
12.60 82032 69.88 1145.5 4.79F 0.12F 6.47 13 .16 336
(/) II 0
12.80 83434 70.03 1152.4 4.71F 0.08A 6.58 13.17 333 zH
• LI")
~ ~
13.00 84839 70.19 1159.1 4.62F 0.27A 6.68 13.18 329
(/) ~
13.20 86246 70.34 1165.8 4.54F 0.46A 6.79 13.19 326
~·~
13.40 87657 70.49 1172.3 4.46F 0.64A 6.89 13.21 323
13.60 89070 70.63 1178.8 4.38F 0.81A 7.00 13.22 320
13.80 90485 70.78 1185.1 4.29F 0.98A 7.10 13.25 316
14.00 91,904 70.92 1191.3 4.21F 1.14A 7.21 13.27 313
(/)
(/)
~
u
~
I
(/)
H
A
·o
.
•
"'
0
CV)
4
l LH 1357 6.60 123.66 260 - -- +--1429 m4 L H only l -- - - - - - .__ _.--.
l LH & TD 2474 8.66 124. 34 416
Appendix VII
m.v.VIJAY - KN Table