Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 2 Trusses 31
2.1 Introduction 31
2.2 Trusses Configuration 31
2.3 Condition Equations 32
2.4 Stability and Determinancy 33
2.5 Methods of Analysis of Simple and Compound Trusses 45
2.6 Method of Joints 45
2.7 Method of Sections 58
2.8 Complex Trusses 80
2.9 Graphical Method of Joints (Maxwell Diagram) 84
Statics of Structures
1.1 SUPPORTS AND REACTIONS
Reaction forces are developed at supports of a structure to equilibrate the effect of the
applied forces. The supports through which a structure transmits its load to the supporting
foundation can be classified as follows:
Roller support:
This support provides restraint against linear movement in the direction normal to supporting
surface as shown in Fig. 1.1a. The magnitude of the resultant reaction force at node a is given
directly by Ra. The direction of Ra is perpendicular to the roller surface and the point of
application is at point a.
Hinge support:
It constrains all translations at the point of attachment, but the structure is free to rotate about
this point. The unknown independent reaction components are Ya and Xa as shown in Fig 1.1b.
Fixed support:
It constrains the point of attachment from translation and rotation. With this type of supports,
there are three unknowns. The unknowns are two reaction forces Xa and Ya in addition to a
fixing moment Ma as shown in Fig. 1.1c.
Guide support:
It constrains the structure from rotation and translation normal to the guide slot as shown in
Fig. 1.1d. Thus, while there is no reactive forces parallel to the slot, there is an unknown force
normal to the slot (Ra) and an unknown bending moment at the support (Ma).
a a
Ra Ra
Xa a Xa a
Ya Ya
Ma Ma
Xa a Xa a
Ya
A structure is considered geometrically stable if for any incipient movement, due to any
conceivable system of applied loads, an elastic resistance to this movement is immediately
developed. A structure is considered statically determinate if the external reactions and the
internal member forces can be determined only by considering the equations of statical
equilibrium without any references to the elastic properties of the structural members.
A rigid planar structure can be acted upon by a general system of forces that can be
combined into a single force and a single moment. For statical stability and determinancy,
the number and arrangement of reactions must be such that they keep the external forces in
equilibrium. Since there are three equations of static equilibrium ( Fx = 0, Fy = 0, M
= 0) for planar structures, there must be three components of reactions, which are neither
parallel nor concurrent. If the components of reactions are less than three, the structure is
unstable. If the number of reaction components is three, and if those components are neither
parallel nor concurrent, the structure is externally stable and determinate. If the number of
reaction components is greater than three, and if the components are arranged such that they
are neither parallel nor concurrent, the structure is externally stable and statically
indeterminate. The degree of external indeterminancy is defined as the number of unknown
reactions in excess of the number of the available equations of statics plus the number of
equations of construction.
The conditions are summarized in the following criteria:
possible that the reaction components are not properly arranged to ensure external stability.
These structures category are geometrically unstable.
Figures 1.2 to 1.4 gives the statical classification of several structures. The simple beam
shown in Fig. 1.2a is unstable because the number of reaction components is less than three (r
= 2). Since the beam shown of Fig 1.2b has no reaction to equilibrate the horizontal component
of the applied loading, the structure will move horizontally if any horizontal load acts on the
beam. On the other hand, the structures shown in Figs. 1.2c and 1.2d have the supports
arranged so that the lines of action of all three reactions intersect at one point. So, the structures
shown in Figs. 1.2a to 1.2d are geometrically unstable. The structures shown in Figs. 1.3a to
1.3f have three reaction components that are neither parallel nor concurrent. Therefore, they
are stable and statically determinate. Finally, the structures shown in Figs 1.4a to 1.4c have
more than three reaction components. These reaction components are neither parallel nor
concurrent, so these structures are stable and statically indeterminate.
(a) (b)
o
o
(c) (d)
(a) (b)
Link
(c) (d)
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 1.4 Stable and statically indeterminate structures
4 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
a b Hinge c Roller
(a) (b)
c = n – 1 ………………………………………………(1.1)
in which n is the number of sides which is connected with the hinge. For example, the hinge
given in Fig. 1.6a gives one condition equation because this hinge connects two sides. On the
other hand, the hinges shown in Figs 1.6b and 1.6c give two and three condition equations,
respectively.
n = 2; c = 1 n = 2; c = 1 n = 2; c = 1 n = 2; c = 1
n = 3; c = 2 n = 3; c = 2 n = 4; c = 3
The frames that contain closed panels require an internal classification in addition to the
external classification. Each closed panel requires three internal condition equations to be
solved. Let e be the number of internal condition equations for a closed panel. Then, the
following condition prevail for each closed panel.
The stability of the frames that contain closed forms can also be determined by cutting the
structure more than one part and by determining the stability of each portion, the whole stability
of the structure is evaluated.
EXAMPLE 1.1
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
r1 r2
a
a b c b
c
b'
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
3+c=3+1=4
r=3
3+c>r unstable
Structure (b)
3+c=3+2=5
r=5
3+c=r stable and statically determinate
For structure (c), the node b can moves a short distance perpendicular to the line ac without
any resistance of members ab or bc. Hence, the structural system (c) is geometrically unstable
since the shape of the structure can be altered without any change in length of any member.
The structure (c) is said to be the critical form. This situation does not exist in the stable
structure (d) since the two arcs r1 and r2 have no common tangent and any incipient movement
of b will generate an immediate resistant from the various parts of the structure.
EXAMPLE 1. 2
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
Structure (a) has no resistance against horizontal loads, so this structure is unstable
Structure (b)
3+c=3+2=5
r=4
3+c>r unstable
Structure (c)
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r stable and statically determinate
Structure (d)
3+c=3+0=3
r=5
3+c<r stable and statically indeterminate to
the second degree
Statics of structures 7
EXAMPLE 1.3
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
a b c
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
3+c=3+2=5
r=5
3+c=r
It is noticed that the part abc of the structure (b) has a critical form, so this structure is
unstable. On the other hand, structures (a) and (c) are stable and statically determinate.
Structure (d)
3+c=3+3=6
r=5
3+c>r unstable
EXAMPLE 1.4
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
8 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
These structures are unstable because the reaction components are concurrent.
Structure (d)
3+c=3+2=5
r=5
3+c=r stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 1.5
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
a b
a
b
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r stable and statically determinate
Structure (b)
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r stable and statically determinate
Statics of structures 9
Structure (c)
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r
The part ab couldn’t resist any load has a vertical component, so this part is unstable.
Structure (d)
3+c=3+2=5
r=6
3+c<r
The part ab couldn’t resist any load has a horizontal component, so this part is unstable.
EXAMPLE 1.6
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
b c
a d
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
Structure (b)
The part abcd couldn’t resist any lateral loads. So the
3 +c=4 c
structure is unstable. Another way for detecting the stability of
b r =4
the structure by dividing it into two portions as shown in figure
and assuming that the upper portion resting on the lower one. It d
is noticed that the upper portion is stable and statically a
determinate while part ab of the lower portion is unstable. So
the structure is unstable
e
d f
Structure (c) 3+c=4 f
When the structure is divided into two portions and b r=4
assuming that the upper portion is resting on the lower one as shown
3+c=4
in figure. It is noticed that, portion bdef is stable and statically b r=4
determinate. On the other portion, part ahg is a critical form, so the a h g
structure is unstable.
Structure (d)
3+c=4
When the structure is divided into two portions and assuming r=4
that the upper portion is resting on the lower one as shown in
figure. It is noticed that, each of the two portions is stable and
statically determinate. So, the structure is stbale and statically 3+c=4
r=4
determinate.
EXAMPLE 1.7
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy.
a c
b
(a) (b)
c
e=3 e=3
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Statics of structures 11
The part abc on the structure (b) has a critical form, so this structure is unstable. On the other
hand, structure (a) is stable and statically determinate.
Structure (c)
3+c=3+1=4 external condition equation is given by hinge at c
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
It is also noticed that each closed form has three condition equations (e = 3 ), so the structure
is internally stable and statically determinate.
Structure (d)
When the structure is divided into two portions and 3 + c = 3; r = 3
assuming that the upper portion carrying the lower one
as shown in figure. It is noticed that, each of the two
portions is stable and statically determinate. So, the 3+c=5
structure is stable and statically determinate. r=5
EXAMPLE 1.8
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
e =3
e =3
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
12 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
Since each closed form has three condition equations, then the structure is internally stable
and statically determinate
3+c =4
Structure (b) r= 4
Dividing the structure into three portions and assuming that each
portion resting on the lower one as shown in figure. It is noticed that,
each portion is stable and statically determinate. So, the structure is
3+c =4
stable and statically determinate. r= 4
3+c =3 3+c =3
r= 3 r= 3
Structure (c)
3+c=3+4=7
r=7
3+c=r stable and statically determinate
Structure (d)
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 1.9
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Statics of structures 13
Structure (a)
3+c=4
Dividing the structure into three portions as shown in r=4
figure. It is noticed that, each portion is stable and statically 3+c=3
determinate. So, the structure is stable and statically r=3
determinate.
3+c=4
r=4
Structure (b)
3+c=3+3=6
r=6
3+c=r stable and statically determinate
Structure (d)
3+c=3+3=6
r=7
3+c<r stable and statically indeterminate to the first degree
EXAMPLE 1.10
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
(a) (b)
c d
b
e=3
(c)
(d)
a e
SOLUTION
14 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Structure (b)
Dividing the structure into two portions and assuming that 3+c=5
the upper portion is resting on the lower one as shown in figure. r=7
It is noticed that, the lower portion is stable and statically
determinate while the upper portion is stable and statically
3+c=3
indeterminate to the second degree. By summing the two r=3
portions once again, the structure is stable and statically
indeterminate to the second degree.
Structure (c)
Dividing the structure into two portions and
assuming that the upper portion resting on the lower one as 3+c=4
r=4
shown in figure. It is noticed that, the upper portion is
stable and statically determinate while lower portion is
unstable. Then, the structure is unstable. 3+c=4
r=3
Structure (d)
3+c=3+1=4 external condition equation is given by the hinge at d
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate.
EXAMPLE 1.11
Classify each of the following structures with respect to stability and statical determinancy
a
Statics of structures 15
(c) (d)
SOLUTION
Structure (a)
3+c=3+3=6
r=5
3+c>r unstable.
Structure (b)
3+c=3+3=6
r=6
3+c=r
In this structure, the column ab couldn’t resist any lateral loading, so the structure is unstable.
Structure (c)
3+c=3+1=4 (the condition equation is given by the hinge at a)
r=3
3+c>r unstable.
It is noticed that the condition equation given by the hinge at a couldn’t be used to find the
additional reaction component. Moreover, the part abc couldn’t resist any lateral loading. So,
the structure is unstable
The equations of static equilibrium play a vital role in determining the reactions for any
structure. If the structure is statically determinate externally, these equations provide all whate
16 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
is needed for the solution, whereas for statically indeterminate cases, the equations of
equilibrium remain applicable, but they are not sufficient for the solution.
In determining the reactions, a free-body diagram (FBD)of the entire structure is
constructed. All given forces are shown to act in their prescribed direction, and each unknown
reaction component is assumed to act in a specified direction. The equations of static
equilibrium are applied in consistency with the assumed directions, and these equations are
solved for the unknown reactions. If the solution yields a positive reaction component, then
the assumed direction is correct, whereas a negative result indicates that the opposite direction
is correct. In the latter case, care must be exercised in subsequent calculations. If the negative
sign is retained, then the originally assumed direction must also be retained. However, the
direction can be reversed on the free-body diagram and a positive sign can then be used in
subsequent steps.
EXAMPLE 1.12
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. 20 kN 50 kN 30 kN
a b e
c d
3m 3m 2m 4m
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
The reaction at b has two unknown components, whereas the reaction at point e has only a
single unknown component as shown in the figure.
20 kN 50 kN 30 kN
b e
Xb
Yb Ye
Determination of Reactions
Px = 0: (→+) Xb = 0
Me = 0: Yb 9 – 20 12 – 50 6 – 30 4 = 0
Yb = 73.3 kN
Py = 0: (+) Ye + Yb – 20 – 50 –30 = 0
Ye + 73.3 – 20 – 50 –30 = 0
Ye = 26.7 kN
The positive sign indicates that the reaction components act in the assumed direction on the
free-body diagram.
Statics of structures 17
EXAMPLE 1.13
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. 40 kN/m
60 kN.m
a d
b c
3m 2m 1m
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
The distributed load is replaced by a resultant concentrated force applied at its centroidal
position. The unknown reaction components are also shown.
1m 60 kN
60 kN.m
a d Xd
Ya
Yd
Determination of Reactions
Px = 0: (→+) Xd = 0
Md = 0: Ya 6 – 60 5 + 60 = 0
Ya = 40 kN
Py = 0: (+) Yd + Ya – 60 = 0
Yd + 40 – 60 = 0
Yd = 20 kN
EXAMPLE 1.14
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. 40 kN 60 kN 10 kN/m
4
a 3 f
b d e
3m 1m 2m 2m 3m
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
48 kN 50 kN
40 kN 2.5 m
Xa a 36 kN
e
Ya Ye
18 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Determination of Reactions
Px = 0: (→+) – Xd + 36 = 0
Xd = 36 kN
Me = 0: Ya 8 – 40 5 – 48 2 + 50 0.5 = 0
Ya = 33.9 kN
Py = 0: (+) Ye + Ya – 40 – 48 – 50 = 0
Ye + 33.9 – 40 – 48 – 50 = 0
Ye = 104.1 kN
EXAMPLE 1.15
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. 15 kN 10 kN 15 kN
5 kN/m
a f i
b c d e g h
6m 2 2 2 2 2 3m 2
SOLUTION
Free-Body Diagram
The structure is separated into three separate free bodies, and the unknown reactions and
internal forces at the hinges are shown in the figure.
15 kN
c e
Xc Xe
40 kN
4m Yc Ye 10 kN 15 kN
Xa f i
a b c Xc Xe e
Ya Yb Yf Yi
Determination of Reactions
Free body ce
The free body diagram ce is treated as a simply supported beam and thus inherently use the
equilibrium conditions. The reactions (internal forces transferred at hinges) are
Xc = Xe = 0 ; Yc = Ye = 7.5 kN
Px = 0: (→+) Xa = 0
Statics of structures 19
Mb = 0: Ya 6 – 40 2 + Yc 2 = 0
Ya 6 – 40 2 + 7.5 2 = 0
Ya = 10.8 kN
Py = 0: (+) Yb + Ya – Yc – 40 = 0
Yb + 10.8 – 7.5 – 40 = 0
Yb = 36.7 kN
Mi = 0: Yf 7 – Ye 9 – 10 5 – 15 2 = 0
Yf 7 – 7.5 9 – 10 5 – 15 2 = 0
Yf = 21.1 kN
Py = 0: (+) Yi + Yf – Ye – 10 –15 = 0
Yi + 21.1 – 7.5 – 10 –15 = 0
Yi = 11.4 kN
EXAMPLE 1.16
Calculate the reactions for the beam shown. 40 kN 15 kN/m 40 kN
10 kN/m
a c d e 20 kN
b f
SOLUTION 4m 4m 1 5m 2m
Free-Body Diagram
The structure is broken into two separate free bodies, and the unknown reactions and internal
forces at the hinge are shown in figure.
37.5 kN
1.67m 40 kN
Xd d
40 kN e f 20 kN
2m 40 kN Yd
c Ye
a
Xc d Xd
Ya Yc
Determination of Reactions
Px = 0: (→+) Xd – 20 = 0
Xd = 20 kN
Me = 0: Yd 5 + 40 2 – 37.5 1.67 = 0
20 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Yd = – 3.5 kN
Py = 0: (+) Ye + Yd – 37.5 – 40 = 0
Ye – 3.5 – 37.5 – 40 = 0
Ye = 81 kN
Px = 0: (→+) Xc – Xd = 0
Xc – 20 = 0
Xc = 20 kN
Mc = 0: Ya 8 + Yd 1 – 40 6 – 40 4 = 0
Ya 8 –3.5 1 – 40 6 – 40 4 = 0
Ya = 50.4 kN
Py = 0: (+) Yc + Ya – Yd – 40 – 40 = 0
Yc + 50.4 + 3.5 – 40 – 40 = 0
Yc = 26.1 kN
EXAMPLE 1.17
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. d
20 kN
40 kN.m 2m
a b c f
2m
SOLUTION e
3m 2m 2m
Free-Body Diagram
The reactions of the link members are shown in their components that are function of the force
in the link member and the inclination of the link.
2/2.83 F Fd
d
d
2 2/2.83 F d
2
83
40 kN.m 20 kN
2.
a c f
Ya
2.
83
2
2 2/2.83 F e
e
2/2.83 F e Fe
Statics of structures 21
Determination of Reactions
Mc = 0: Ya 5 + 20 2 – 40 = 0
Ya = 0
Me = 0: 2/2.83 Fd 4 – 40 = 0
Fd = 14.1 kN
EXAMPLE 1.18
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. 40 kN.m 60 kN 20 kN/m
c b d e
4m
a f
SOLUTION 2m 5m 3m 3m
120 kN 3m
40 kN.m 60 kN
d
b
7
4 4
2/4.47 F a 2 3
a f Xf
Fa Yf
4/4.47 F a
Determination of Reactions
Mf = 0: 4/4.47 Fa 10 + 40 – 60 8 = 0
Fa = 49.2 kN
Px = 0: (→+) – Xf + 2/4.47 Fa = 0
– Xf + 2/4.47 49.2 = 0
Xf = 22 kN
EXAMPLE 1.19
Calculate the reactions for the frame shown. al
onH
m
20 kN kN/ d 30 kN 1.5 m
12
1.5 m
c b e 10 kN
4m
a f
SOLUTION 2m 6m 4m
72 kN
20 kN 30 kN
10 kN
3m
Free body diagram
Xa
a f
Yf
Ya
Determination of Reactions
Px = 0: (→+) Xa – 30 – 10 = 0
Xa = 40 kN
Mf = 0: Ya 10 – 20 12 – 72 7 – 30 5.5 – 10 4= 0
Ya = 94.9 kN
Py = 0: (+) Yf + Ya – 20 – 72 = 0
Yf + 94.9 – 20 – 72 = 0
Yf = – 2.9 kN
EXAMPLE 1.20
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. 15 kN 50 kN
b c
a
4m
10 kN/m
d
1m 3m 3m
SOLUTION
Statics of structures 23
15 kN 50 kN c
Xb b
Yb
Mc (left) = 0
40 kN
Free-Body Diagram 2m
Mc (bottom) = 0
Xd d
Yd
Determination of Reactions
Mc (left)= 0: Yb 6 – 15 7 – 50 3 = 0
Yb = 42.5 kN
Mc (bottom)= 0: Xd 4 – 40 2= 0
Xd = 20 kN
Py = 0: (+) Yd + Yb – 15 – 50 = 0
Yd + 42.5 – 15 – 50 = 0
Yd = 22.5 kN
Px = 0: (→+) Xb + Xd – 40 = 0
Xb + 20 – 40 = 0
Xb = 20 kN
EXAMPLE 1.21
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. 20 kN
15 kN/m 18 kN/m
b c d
4m
a 1m
SOLUTION
2m 4m
30 kN 60 kN
20 kN
1m c 2m
36 kN
Determination of Reactions
Mc (left)= 0: Ya 2 – Xa 5 – 30 1 = 0 ……………………….………(a)
Xa = 14 kN; Ya = 50 kN
Py = 0: (+) Ye + Ya – (15 6) = 0
Ye = 40 kN
Px = 0: (→+) – Xe + Xa + 20 – 36 = 0
Xe = – 2 kN
EXAMPLE 1.22
Calculate the reactions for the frame shown. 30 kN
40 kN 8k
N/ m
20 kN d 35 kN
3m
b
c e f
3m
80 kN
g 3m
a
SOLUTION 2m 3m 3m 6m 2m
30 kN 53.67 kN
40 kN d
20 kN 35 kN
3m
e
80 kN
Free body diagram M e (bottom)
=0
Xa a Md (right) = 0 Xg
g
Ma
Yg
Ya
Determination of Reactions
Me (bottom)= 0: Xg 6 + 80 3 = 0
Xg = – 40 kN
Md (right)= 0: Yg 6 – Xg 9 - 80 6 – 35 8 – 53.67 3 = 0
Yg 6 + 40 9 – 80 6 – 35 8– 53.67 3 = 0
Yg = 93.5 kN
Statics of structures 25
Ma = 0: Ma – Yg 12 – 80 3 – 35 8 +35 14 + 53.67 9+ 30 6 +
40 3 – 20 2 = 0
Mg = 129 kN.m
Px = 0: (→+) Xa – Xg – 80 = 0
Xa = 40 kN
EXAMPLE 1.23
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. 8 kN/m
a b c
3m
d e f 15 kN
g
30 kN 40 kN
SOLUTION 3m 2m 2m 2m
Free-Body Diagram
40 kN
Ma 2.5 m
a b c
Xa
2/3.61F be 2/3.61Fcf 3/3.61F be 3/3.61F cf
Ya
b c
3/3.61Fbe 3/3.61Fcf 2/3.61F be 2/3.61F cf
2
3/3.61Fbe 3/3.61Fcf
3
1
3.6
Determination of Reactions
EXAMPLE 1.24
Calculate the reactions for the structure shown. 8 kN/m
10 kN
15 kN d e f 10 kN
12 kN/m
3m
c b g j
i
4m
a h k
SOLUTION 2m 3m 6m 2m 4m
24 kN 48 kN
10 kN
15 kN 48 kN
e 3m 10 kN
1.5m
Free body diagram i 2m
Me (left) = 0
Xa Xh
a h k
Ya Yh Yk
Mi (right) = 0
Determination of Reactions
Mi (right)= 0: Yk 4 – 48 2 = 0
Ya = 24 kN
Mh = 0: Ya 9 – 15 11 – (8 9) 4.5 – 10 7 + 10 2 + 48 4
– Yk 6 = 0
Ya 9 – 15 11 – (8 9) 4.5 – 10 7 + 10 2 + 48 4
– 24 6 = 0
Ya = 54.6 kN
Statics of structures 27
Me (left)= 0: Xa 7 – Ya 3 + 15 5 + 24 1.5 = 0
Xa 7 – 54.6 3 + 15 5 + 24 1.5 = 0
Xa = 7.5 kN
Px = 0: (→+) – Xh + Xa – 10 = 0
– Xh + 7.5 – 10 = 0
Xh = – 2.5 kN
Py = 0: (+) Yh + Ya + Yk – 15 – (8 9) – 10 – 48 = 0
Yh + 54.6 + 24 – 15 – (8 9) – 10 – 48 = 0
Yh = 66.4 kN
28 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Problems
Calculate the reactions for the following structures:
20 kN
10 kN/m 6 kN/m
a c a
b b c
1
7m 2 3m 5m 2m
(1) (2)
30 kN 40 kN
20 kN 15 kN/m
1 15 kN/m
b 1 a
a c e f c
d b d e
30 kN.m
2m 2m 2m 4m 2m 1.5 m 1.5 m 1.5 m 2.0 m
(3) (4)
N/m d
20 kN
8k 2m
30 kN
8 kN/m
b d e g
a
c f b
c
6m 3m 5m 2m 3m 2m
10 kN
1m 4m
(5) (6)
20 kN
10 kN/m 40 kN.m 10 kN/m
a b e
f
c d
40 kN 40 kN
3m
3m 20 kN
a b
d e c
f
3m 3m 2m 4m
6m 2m 3m 2m
(7) (8)
60 kN
30 kN/m
e 40 kN
b f 20 kN/m
c d
b e
80 kN c d
2.5 m
6m
60 kN 2.5 m
a g a
1.5 m 5m 3m 2m 3m 3m 2m 4m 4m
(9) (10)
Statics of structures 29
20 kN/m 20 kN
20 kN d
10 kN/m 30 kN g
30 kN.m e f
c f 2m
a g
10 kN/m
b d c b
4m 2m
20 kN a
e h h
2m
i
3m 4m 3m 4m 2m
1m 8m 2m
(11) (12)
20 kN
10 kN/m 20 kN/m
b d d
a c b
c
2m
4m
a 40 kN
10 kN/m
10 kN/m
e 2m
1m 2m 4m e
2m 4m
(13) (14)
60 kN 30 kN/m
f
b 15 kN
c e 60 kN 30 kN/m
4m b f
20 kN c e g
a d g
20 kN 4m
a d
3m 3m 2m 4m 2m
6m 2m 4m 2m
(15) (16)
H al
m on
20 kN kN/ d 30 kN 1.5 m 20 kN/m
20 e
f
10 kN 1.5 m 25 kN
c b e
4m
4m
a d
a f b c
3m 3m 3m 2m
2m 6m 4m
(17) (18)
30 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
90 kN 20 20 kN/m
kN h
e /m 20 kN j
20 kN 10 kN i
3m
2m
d c f g f g
3m 40 kN 2m
b h 20 kN
e
i 2m c d
a 1.5 m
3m 3m
(19) (20)
2
Statically Determinate Trsses
2.1 Introduction
Trusses consist of straight members joined together at their ends by joints assumed
incapable of resisting any moment, that is, frictionless pins. However, the joints of actual
trusses used in construction do possess a certain amount of rigidity leading to a certain amount
of restraint rotation. The assumption of joints behaving as frictionless pins greatly simplifies
the analysis of a truss. Furthermore, extensive theoretical and experimental investigations
indicate that the error introduced by this assumption is insignificant when loaded at their joints.
To avoid eccentricity at joints, the centroidal axis of each member is straight and coincides
with the line connecting the joint centers at all ends of the members. Simple analysis of an
idealized truss results in purely axial forces in the members of the truss that is either tensile or
compressive.
The simplest form of a stable planar truss is a triangle arrangement of three members as
shown in Fig. 2.1a. Each additional joint can be obtained by adding two bars to the joints
already formed. Such a truss is called a simple truss. These trusses are always composed of
triangular shapes as shown in Figs. 2.1a and 2.1b.
e
e f
c d d
c c
a b
a b a b
(a) (b) (c)
A compound truss consists of two or more simple trusses joined so that relative motion of
the components is constrained. Three conditions of connectivity are required to prevent
relative translation and rotation. Two simple plane trusses are combined together by three
nonparallel nonconcurrent bars to form a compound truss as shown in Fig. 2.2a. Since two
32 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
bars can be replaced by a common hinge, a compound truss can also be formed by joining
together two plane trusses with a common hinge and bar, as shown in Figs. 2.2b and 2.2c.
Trusses that cannot be classified as either simple or compound are called complex trusses as
shown in Fig.2.2d.
a d a
Hinge
e f
b c b c
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
a b c
a b
(a) (b)
a
b c a c
e b e
(c) (d)
Based on the forgoing discussion, criteria can be developed concerning the statical
determinancy of truss structures. First, the truss can be checked for external determinancy and
stability according to the criteria developed in Chapter 1. In which, if r is taken as the actual
number of reaction components and c is the number of condition equations, then the following
criteria can be:
These conditions are necessary but not sufficient conditions for statical classification. The
condition equations should be properly added to enable the determination of the additional
reaction components.
For internal classification, in addition to the above definition for r and c, let m be the total
number of bars and j the total number of joints. Then, the following conditions prevail:
where c + 3 is the minimum required components of reactions. Care must be exercised in using
the above conditions. If m + c + 3 < 2j, the truss is definitely unstable, but if m + c + 3 2j, it
doesn’t necessarily follow that the truss is stable. It is possible that m bars are not properly
arranged to ensure internal stability. Such trusses are said to have critical form.
34 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.1
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
e d e
d
c a c
a
b
b
Truss 1 Truss 2
d e d e
a c a b c
b
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 7 + 0 +3 = 10
2j = 10
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Trusses 2, 3, and 4
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r
m + c + 3 = 6 + 1 +3 = 10
2j = 10
m + c + 3 = 2j
Although the stability conditions are theoretically satisfied for Trusses 2, 3, and 4, Truss 2 is
geometrically unstable because it has a critical form. In this form, point b can move
perpendicular to line ac without any resistance. Also, the intermediate hinge at b couldn’t be
used to determine the additional horizontal reaction at c. On the other hand Trusses 3 and 4
are stable and statically determinate.
EXAMPLE 2.2
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
c e c e
a f f
a
b d b d
Statically determinate trusses 35
Truss 1 Truss 2
c e e
c
b
a f
a f b d
d
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 +3 = 12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Trusses 2, 3, and 4
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r
m + c + 3 = 8 + 1 +3 =
12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j
Studying the condition equations of trusses 2, 3, and 4 leads to the following conclusion:
c c
o c
Mo = 0
Fy = 0 Mo = 0
b o a
a a b
b
The additional horizontal reaction at support a can only be determined from the condition
equation of Truss 3, so, Truss 3 is stable and statically determinate while Trusses 2 and 4 are
unstable.
36 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.3
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
b d g i d g
b i
Truss 1
e Truss 2 e
a h a h
c f c f
Me= 0
b d g i
b d g i
Truss 3 e
Truss 4
a c f h
a h
c
Me= 0 f Mc = 0, Mg= 0
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3+c=3+1=4
r=3
3+c>r externally unstable
Truss 2
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 13 + 0 +3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 3
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 12 + 1 +3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 4
3+c=3+2=5
r=5
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 11 + 2 +3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Statically determinate trusses 37
EXAMPLE 2.4
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
f e
e f
d d
Fx = 0 Fx = 0
Truss 1 Truss 2
c c
a b a b
e f e f
d d
Truss 3 Truss 4
c c
a b a b
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3+c=3+1=4
r=3
3+c>r geometrically unstable
Truss 2
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 1 + 3 = 13
2j = 12
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the first
degree
Trusses 3 and 4
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and determinate
EXAMPLE 2.5
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
b d b d M =0
d
Truss 1 Mc = 0
Truss 2
a e a c e
c
38 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
b d
b d
Truss 3 Truss 4
a e Mb = 0 e
c a
c
SOLUTION
Trusses 1 and 2
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r
m + c + 3 = 7 + 1 + 3 = 11
2j = 10
m + c + 3 > 2j internally statically indeterminate to the first degree
Although m, c, r, and j are the same for the two trusses, Truss 1 is unstable because its
geometry produces a critical form. In this case, small movement of node c can occur
perpendicular to the line ae without any resistance and also the condition equation at c couldn’t
be used to determine the additional horizontal reaction at e. On the other hand, Truss 2 is stable
and internally indeterminate to the first degree.
Truss 3
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 7 + 0 + 3 = 10
2j = 10
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 4
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 6 + 1 + 3 = 10
2j = 10
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 2.6
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 Truss 2
Statically determinate trusses 39
Truss 4
Truss 3
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m+c+3=5+0+3=8
2j = 8
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 2
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 3
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 12 + 0 + 3 = 15
2j = 16
m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable
Truss 4
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m+c+3=9+0+3=8
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
40 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.7
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
f
a Mb = 0 determinate
d e
Truss 1 Truss 2
Ma = 0 a c
b
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 14 + 1 + 3 = 18
2j = 18
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 2
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 8 + 1 + 3 = 12
2j = 12
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 3
3+c=3+0=3
r=4
3+c<r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
m + c + 3 = 16 + 0 + 3 = 19
2j = 18
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
Truss 4
3+c=3+0=3
r=4
Statically determinate trusses 41
m + c + 3 = 10 + 0 + 3 = 13
2j = 12
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to
the first degree
EXAMPLE 2.8
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 Truss 2
Ma = 0 a
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 12 + 1 + 3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 2
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 12 + 0 + 3 = 15
2j = 16
m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable
Truss 3
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 26 + 0 + 3 = 29
2j = 28
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
42 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Truss 4
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 17 + 0 + 3 = 20
2j = 20
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 2.9
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
a
Fy = 0
Truss 1 Truss 2
b c
o
Mo = 0
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 15 + 0 + 3 = 18
2j = 20
m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable
Truss 2
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r
m + c + 3 = 14 + 1 + 3 = 18
2j = 18
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and determinate
It is noticed that the condition equation Fy = 0 at the shown vertical section is useful for
determining the additional reaction component at c. On the other hand, the static equations (
Statically determinate trusses 43
Truss 3
3+c=3+0=3
r=4
3+c<r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
m + c + 3 = 13 + 0 + 3 = 16
2j = 16
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 4
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 11 + 1 + 3 = 15
2j = 16
m + c + 3 < 2j internally unstable
EXAMPLE 2.10
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1 a c e
Md = 0, Me = 0
Truss 2
b
Ma = 0
Truss 3 Truss 4
SOLUTION
Truss 1
3+c=3+2=5
r=5
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 23 + 2 + 3 = 28
2j = 28
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
44 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
It should be noticed that the reaction components at b could be analyzed as internal forces in
members ba and bc by the method of joint. This is necessary to activate the first condition
equation ( Md (left) = 0).
Truss 2
3+c=3+0=3
r=4
3+c<r externally stable and statically indeterminate to the
first degree
m + c + 3 = 21 + 0 + 3 = 24
2j = 24
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 3
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 11 + 0 + 3 = 14
2j = 14
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
Truss 4
3+c=3+1=4
r=4
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 10 + 1 + 3 = 14
2j = 14
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate
EXAMPLE 2.11
Determine the conditions of stability and determinancy of the trusses shown.
Truss 1
Truss 2
Truss 3
Truss 4
SOLUTION
Statically determinate trusses 45
Truss 1
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 19 + 0 + 3 = 22
2j = 20
m + c + 3 > 2j internally stable and statically indeterminate to the
second degree.
Truss 2
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 9 + 0 + 3 = 12
2j = 14
m + c + 3 < 2j unstable
Truss 3
3+c=3+0=3
r=3
3+c=r externally stable and statically determinate
m + c + 3 = 19 + 0 + 3 = 22
2j = 22
m + c + 3 = 2j internally stable and statically determinate.
Truss 4
In this truss, it is noticed that the lines of action of all reactions intersect at point a. So, the
truss is geometrically unstable.
Three methods of analysis that are most common for simple and compound trusses.
These are the method of joints, method of sections, and graphical method. The method of
joints and the graphical method are useful when the forces in all or in the majority of the truss
members are required, whereas the method of sections is more convenient if the forces in few
members of the truss are required. Sometimes a combination of the method of section with
the other two methods is useful, especially in the analysis of compound trusses. In some
trusses, the use of the method of section is required for determining some member forces
before using the other two methods.
The method of joints is frequently a simple way of analyzing a statically determinate truss.
In common cases, the unknown reactions can be first determined by taking the entire truss as a
46 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
free body. Next, the joints containing only two unknown member forces are analyzed using
their free body diagrams. The two equations of static equilibrium involving summation of
forces in two orthogonal directions are applied to determine the two unknown member forces
at the joint. The procedure continues until all internal axial forces are computed. Since, the
total number of joint equations of equilibrium is more than the number of unknown member
forces, there will be surplus equations for checking purposes after member axial forces have
been obtained.
A number of frequently occurring special conditions can be used to shorten the calculation.
These conditions are summarized in the following rules:
Rule 1
With reference to Joint a, it should be noticed that members ab and ac are in Fad
the same direction. Since the joint is not loaded, it can be concluded that the
F ac Fab
force in the third member ad is zero (Fad = 0) and Fab = Fac. This fact can be
verified by constructing the free-body diagram for joint a and summing the a
forces first in the vertical direction and then in the horizontal direction.
Rule 2
With reference to the unloaded Joint e which has only two members, it can be F eg
concluded that the forces in the two members are equal to zero (Fef = 0, Feg = F ef
0 ). This fact can be verified by summing the forces in the vertical and e
horizontal directions, respectively.
Rule 3
Fkn
For Joint k, the forces in opposite members must be equal; that is, Fkl = Fkm F
km Fkl
and Fkn = Fko. This can be demonstrated by summing the forces first in the
k
vertical direction and then in the horizontal direction F ko
Example 2.12
40 kN
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the method of e
1.5
joints.
2 2m
2 .5
c d
3
4
5
4m
SOLUTION
a b
1.5 m 1.5 m
Determination of Reactions 40 kN
e
Fx = 0: Xa = 0
Xa =0
b
Y a=20 kN a Y b =20 kN
Statically determinate trusses 47
Joint e
e
Fy = 0 (+): 2/2.5 Fde + 2/2.5 Fce + 40 = 0 ………..(b)
Joint c
Joint a
F ac = 40
Fx = 0 (→ +): Fab + 3/5 25 = 0 F ad = 25
Fab = – 15 kN
a F ab
Fy (+): 40 – 4/5 25 – 20 = 0 ……………….(Check)
20 kN
40 kN
- 25
-25
Member forces
25
-40
-40
25
-15
20 kN 20 kN
48 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Example 2.13
b
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using
the method of joints. 4.5 m
d
6 6
4.5 5 7 .5 4.5 4.5 m
7.
SOLUTION a c
e
40 kN 20 kN
6m 6m
Determination of Reactions
Joint e
F de
Fy = 0 (+): 4.5/7.5 Fde – 20 = 0
Fde = 33.3 kN F ce e
Joint c
Joint d
Fb d
Fy = 0 (+): 4.5/7.5 Fbd – 4.5/7.5 Fad – 40 d
– 4.5/7.5 33.3 = 0 ……………………(a)
F ad 33.3
Fx = 0 (→ +): – 6/7.5 Fbd – 6/7.5 Fad
40
+ 6/7.5 33.3 = 0 ………………..….…(b)
Joint b
Fab = 20 kN b
53.3 kN
Fx = 0 (→ +): 6/7.5 66.7 – 53.3 = 0 …………(Check) 66.7
F ab
Joint a
20
Fy = 0 (+): 20 – 4.5/7.5 33.3 = 0 ……………(Check) 33.3
53.3 kN 26.7
Fx = 0 (→ +): 53.3 – 26.7 - 6/7.5 33.3 = 0 ……..(Check) a
60 kN
53.3 kN 66
.7
20
Member forces
3 .3 33
-3 .3
40
53.3 kN
-26.7 -26.7
40 kN 20 kN
EXAMPLE 2.14
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the 3 h
method of joints. 3
24
3m
4.
e
1.5 f g
5
3 3m
3 .3
c 50 kN
d
5. 4
1
3 3m
a 4.5 b
1.5 1.5 3m 3m
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
h
Mb =0: Ya 6 – 50 3 = 0
Ya = 25 kN g
e
f
Fy (+): Yb – Ya – 50 = 0 50 kN
Yb – 25 – 50 = 0 c d
Yb = 75 kN
Xa =0
a b
Fx (→+): Xa = 0 Ya =25 kN Yb = 75 kN
50 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Joint g
Joint h
Joint f
100
Fx = 0 (→ +): – Fef – 50 = 0
Fef = – 50 kN f 50
F ef
Fy = 0 (+): – Fdf – 100 = 0 F df
Fdf = – 100 kN
Joint e
Joint d
23.6
Fx = 0 (→ +): – Fcd – 3/4.243 23.6 = 0 100
Fcd = – 16.7 kN
F cd d
Fy = 0 (+): – Fbd – 100 + 3/4.24 23.6 = 0
F bd
Fbd = – 83.3 kN
Joint c
Statically determinate trusses 51
Joint b
83.3
Fx = 0 (→ +): – Fab – 4.5/5.41 15 = 0 15
Fab = –12.5 kN
F ab b
Fy = 0 (+): 75 +3/5.41 15 – 83.3 = 0 ……….(Check) 75 kN
Joint a
28
Fx = 0 (→ +): 1.5/3.35 28 – 12.5 = 0 ………….(Check)
a 12.5
.7
70
50 kN
-50 -50
23
-100
3
37.
.6
Member forces
-16.7
-83.3
15
28
-12.5
25 kN 75 kN
Example 2.15
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using 10 kN 10 kN
d
the method of joints. 10 kN e
10 kN 3m
10 kN f
7 .2
c 4. 6
1
24
3 4 3m
3
a b
3m 4m 3m
SOLUTION
52 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Determination of Reactions
Mb : Ya 4 + 10 (3 – 7 + 6 – 4)= 0 d
10 kN 10 kN
10 kN e
Ya = 5 kN
10 kN
10 kN f
Fy (+): Yb + Ya – 10 – 10 – 10 = 0 c
Yb + 5 – 10 – 10 –10 = 0
Yb = 25 kN b
X a =20 kN a
Xa = 20 kN
Joint c
Joint f
F ef
According to rule 2; Fef = Fbf = 0
f
F bf
Joint e
Fx = 0 (→ +): Fde = 0 10 kN
e
Fy = 0 (+): – Fbe – 10 = 0 F de
Fbe = – 10 kN 0
F be
Joint d
Joint b
10
18
Fx = 0 (→ +): – Fab + 4/7.21 18 = 0 0
Fab = – 10 kN F ab b
25 kN
Fy = 0 (+): 25 – 10 – 6/7.21 18 = 0 ……….(Check)
Statically determinate trusses 53
Joint a
10
Fy = 0 (+): 5 + 5 – 3/4.24 14.1 = 0 …………(Check) 20 kN
a
5 kN
10 kN 10 kN
10 kN 0
10 kN 0 0
Member forces
-1 8
-10
5
10 kN
-1 0
4.
1
10
20 kN
5 kN 25 kN
EXAMPLE 2.16
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown 100 kN e 100 kN
truss using the method of joints. 2
10 d
5
f 2m
c 1 0.2 .4 9 h 2m
13 11 .1 8
5 5m
10
11 .1 8 b g 10
5 5m
a i
10
4 at 10 m = 40m
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
100 kN e 100 kN
d f
From symmetry: Ya = Yi = 100 kN c h
Me (left) = 0:
b
Xa 14 + 100 10 – Ya 20 = 0 g
a Xa =71.4 Xi=71.4 i
Xa = 71.4 kN
Ya=100 kN Yi=100 kN
Fx = 0: Xi = Xa = 71.4 kN
Joint a
Joint c
Fbc
Fy = 0 (+): – 5/11.18 Fbc + 2/10.2 Fcd + 64.3 = 0 .(b)
64.3
Solving (a) and (b),
Fbc = 102.7 kN , Fcd = – 93.7 kN
Joint d
100 kN
According to Rule 3: Fbd = – 100 kN , Fde = – 93.7 kN d
F de
93.7
F bd
Joint b
100 kN 100 kN
-9 3 .7 -9 3. 7
-9 3 .7 -9 3 .7
-10 0
27
-1 0 0
Member forces .5 . .7
1 02 27 5 102
-64 .3
-64 .3
.7
. 9 -7 9
-7 9 . 9
71.4 kN 71.4 kN
100 kN 100 kN
EXAMPLE 2.17
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using the 100 kN
method of joints. f h
4 g 11
.3
4
1
8 .9
8 8 8m
8
d e
8m
a c
b
SOLUTION 4m 4m 4m 4m
Statically determinate trusses 55
Determination of Reactions
100 kN
g
f h
Fx (→+):
d e
Xa = 0
Xa=0
a c
b
Ya=50 kN Yc=50 kN
Joint f
f
According to Rule 2: Ffg = Fdf = 0 Ffg
Fdf
Joint g
0 g 0
Fy = 0 (+): – 8/11.31 Fdg – 8/11.31 Feg – 100 = 0 …….(b)
Fdg F eg
Solving (a) and (b),
Fdg = Feg = – 70.7 kN
Joint a
Joint b
F bd Fbe
F bd F be
According to rule 1: Fbd = Fbe = 0
25 25
b
b
Joint d
0 70.7
Fx = 0 (→ +): Fde – 4/8.94 55.9 – 8/11.31 70.7 = 0
Fde = 75 kN d F de
100 kN
0 0
0 0
7
0.
-7
-7
0.
7
75
Member forces
0 0
-5 5
.9
- 55
.9
-25 -25
50 kN 50 kN
EXAMPLE 2.18
Calculate the forces in all members of the shown truss using d 20 kN
4
the method of joints. c 2 4 .4 7
3 2m
40 kN 4
5
40 kN
6
5. 6
4 2m
a 4 e
b f
10 kN
60 kN
5
4 4m
3
g
SOLUTION
4m 4m 3m
Determination of Reactions
Md (left) = 0:
20 kN
Ya8 + Xa4 – 402 –604 = 0 ..(b) 40 kN c
40 kN
Xa =80 10 kN
Solving (a) and (b), a
b
e f
Ya = 0 ; Xa = 80 kN Ya =0 60 kN
Fy =0 (+): Yg + Ya – 60 – 40 = 0 Yg =100 kN
g
Xg=10 kN
Yg = 100 kN
Fx =0 (→+): Xg – Xa + 40 +20 + 10 = 0
Xg = 10 kN
Statically determinate trusses 57
Joint a
Fac
According to Rule 1: Fab = 80 kN , Fac = 0 a
80 kN F ab
Joint b
F bc
Fx =0 (→+): 4/5.66 Fbd – 80 = 0 F bd
Fbd = 113.1 kN
80
b
Joint e
F de
According to rule 3: Fde = – 86.7 kN , Fef = – 10 kN e
F ef
10 kN
86.7
Joint f
20 kN
.7
-44
33
40 kN
-86.7
1
.3
40 kN
3.
11
Member forces
-20
0
80 kN -10
80 10 kN
.7
-86.7
-16
60 kN
10 kN
100 kN
When the method of joints leads to a situation where no subsequent joint contains only
two unknown member forces, the next approach would be to use a group of joints (called a
section of the truss) as a free body. The method of sections may be used in lieu of the method
of joints, even when the method of joints is possible. The three equations of statics ( Fx =0,
Fy =0, and M =0) can be then used to calculate the unknown member forces.
Example 2.19
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown c e g
4
truss using the method of sections. 5 3
3m
a h
b d f
20 kN 20 kN 20 kN
4 at 4 m = 16m
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
s1 e g
s2 c
From symmetry: Ya = Yh = 20 3 /2 = 30 kN Xa=0 h
a b s2 d f
s1
Fx = 0 (→+): Xa = 0 Ya=30 20 kN 20 kN 20 kN Yh =30
Section s1-s1
F ce e
Me = 0 Fbd 3 + 20 4 – 30 8 = 0; Fbd = 53.3 kN c
Fbe
Section s2-s2
F ac F bc
Mb = 0 3/5 Fac 4 + 30 4 = 0 16.7
Fac = – 50 kN a
b 53.3
30
20
30
-1
40 53.3 53.3 40
20 kN 20 kN 20 kN
30 kN 30 kN
Example 2.20
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss j k
using the method of sections. 10 kN 2
1.5 m
1.5
2.5
i
10 kN g h
1.5 m
f
10 kN d e
1.5 m
SOLUTION a
b
c
2m 2m
Determination of Reactions
Mc =0: Ya 4 – 10 1.5 – 10 3 10 kN
j
k
– 10 4.5 = 0
10 kN g h i
Ya = 22.5 kN s2 s2
s1 s1
Fy (+): Yc – Ya = 0 10 kN d f
e
Yc = 22.5 kN
Xa =30 kN
c
Fx =0 (→+):
a b
– Xa + 10 + 10 + 10 = 0 Ya =22.5 kN Yc =22.5 kN
Xa = 30 kN
Section s1-s1
Fdg = 11.3 kN 10 kN F de F ef
f
d
Section s2-s2
i
11.3
Mi = 0 1.5/2.5 Feg 2 + 2/2.5 Feg 1.5+ 11.3 4 F eg F ei
11.3
+ 30 3 – 10 1.5 – 22.5 4 = 0 10 kN
f
Feg = – 12.5 kN d e
30 kN
Fx (→+): 2/2.5 Fei – 2/2.5 Feg + 10 – 30 = 0 a b
c
10 kN -5
-6 2
3.8
.2
-3 .8
6.
10 kN -5 -10
Member forces 11 .3 - 12
.5
-11 .3
.5
12
10 kN 5 -15
- 18
22.5
-22.5
.8 .8
18
30 kN 30 0
22.5 kN 22.5 kN
Example 2.21
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown 50 kN 80 kN
c e
truss using the method of sections. a
3 3
g
3 3m
4.
4.5 1
24
5. 4
b 6 .1 8 f
1.5 1.5 m
40 kN d 6
3m 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
Fx =0 (→+): Xa = 0
50 kN
9m a c
Fce
Section s1-s1 o
F cd
93.3 kN b
F bd d
40 kN
Statically determinate trusses 61
Section s2-s2
F ac
Mb =0: Fac 3 + 93.3 3 = 0 a
Fac = – 93.3 kN F bc
93.3 kN b
Fy (+): 3/4.24 Fbc – 1.5/6.18 120.9 + 93.3 – 40 = 0 120.9
40 kN
Fbc = – 33.9 kN
50 kN 80 kN
- 31
-6
.9
3.
8
2
5.
Member forces
-3
10
- 40
.2
1 2 0 .9
126. 4
93.3 kN 76.7 kN
40 kN
Example 2.22
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown d e f g
h
10 kN
truss using the method of sections. 10
14
.1
4 10
10
14
.1 4
10 m
b 10
c i j
20 kN
10 m
SOLUTION a k
10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m
Determination of Reactions
Mk =0: Ya 40 – 20 10 – 10 20 = 0 d g
s1 e h
Ya = 10 kN 10 kN f
s2
s1
Fy =0 (+):
b
Yk – Ya = 0 c
s2
i j
20 kN
Yk = 10 kN
Xa =20
Xk=10 k
a
Mf (right)=0: Xk 20 – Yk 20 = 0 Ya =10 kN Yk=10 kN
Xk = 10 kN
Fx =0 (→+): – Xa – Xk + 10+ 20 = 0
Xa = 20 kN
62 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section s1-s1
F cf
b
Mf =0: Fce 10 – 20 10 + 20 20 – 10 20= 0 c
20 kN
Fce = 0
20 kN
a
Fy =0 (+): 10/14.14 Fcf + Fce - 10 = 0 10 kN
Fcf = 14.1 kN
Section s2-s2
Fbd
Mc =0: Fbd 10 + 20 10 – 10 10= 0 F cd 0
14.1
Fbd = – 10 kN b
c
20 kN
10 kN d -20 e -20 f 0 g 0
h
-1
0 0
14
.1
0
4.
-10
14
.1
0
20 kN -20 0
Member forces b c i j
-1
.3
-10
4.
28
0
1
10 kN
a k
20 kN
10 kN 10 kN
Example 2.23
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown truss c
e
6 .7
g
h
3 1
3m
using the method of sections. 6
f 120 kN
.81
10
7 5 5m
8
6 6
8 d
.8 9
16
10
8m
17
8
6
a b
SOLUTION
8m 6m 6m 6m
Determination of Reactions
s3 s2
c e s1 g
h
Mb =0: Ya 8 – 120 18 = 0
f
Ya = 270 kN 120 kN
s2 s 1
s4 d
Fy =0 (+): Yb – Ya – 120 = 0 s3
Yb = 390 kN Xa =0 s4
b
a
Ya =270 Yb=390 kN
Fx =0 (→+): Xa = 0
Statically determinate trusses 63
Section s1-s1
Section s2-s2
9.6 m
F ce e
Md =0: Fce 8 +390 6 – 270 14= 0 c o
F de
Fce = 180 kN
234.3
Mo =0: Fde 9.6 + 390 15.6 – 270 23.6 = 0
d
Fde = 30 kN
a b
270 kN 390 kN
Section s3-s3
12 m
Mc =0: 6/10 Fbd 16 + 270 8 = 0
c p
Fbd = – 225 kN 180
F cd
Mp =0: 8/10 Fcd 12 + 270 20 – 390 12= 0
Fcd = – 75 kN
F bd
a b
270 kN 390 kN
Section s4-s4
F ac F bc
225
Mb =0: 16/17.89 Fac 8 – 270 8 = 0
Fac = 301.9 kN
a b
Ma =0: Fbc 8 + 390 8 – 8/10 225 8 = 0 270 kN 390 kN
Fbc = – 210 kN
64 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
30
-2 6
-7
120 kN
4 .3
.9
5
- 23
301
-210
Member forces
5
-2 2
-135
270 kN 390 kN
Example 2.24
Determine the forces in the marked members of the 20 kN
20 kN
shown truss using the method of sections. i 6
2m
2.8
6 .3 2 2
5 kN 2
3
f 2g h
e
66
4 4m
5.
SOLUTION a
4
d
b c
4m 2m 2m 4m
Determination of Reactions
Section s1- s1
Section s2- s2
Statically determinate trusses 65
5 kN F ef
Fx =0 (→+): Fef + 11.7 + 5 – 5 – 6/6.32 5.3 = 0 F bf
Fef = – 6.7 kN
5 kN 11.7
a b
28.3 kN
Section s3- s3
F ae 6.7
F be
Mb =0: Fae 4 + 28.3 4 = 0
Fae = – 28.3 kN 5 kN 11.7
a b
28.3 kN
Fx =0 (→+): – 4/5.66 Fbe + 11.7 – 5 = 0
Fbe = 9.4 kN
20 kN
20 kN
-5 . 3 0
-1
5 kN
.4
6
-9
.5
-11 .7
-6.7
-11.7
.5
9.
16
4
5 kN 5 11.7 0
28.3 kN 11.7 kN
Example 2.25
Determine the forces in the marked members of the 40 kN
shown truss using the method of sections. c d
b 1.5 m
1.5 e
2
5
2m
2.
a f
SOLUTION
1.5 m 2 m 3.5 m 2 m 1.5 m
Determination of Reactions
Fx =0 (→+): Xa = 0
66 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section s1-s1
1.125 m 2.625 m
c F cd
g
Mo =0: 1.5/2.5 Fab 1.5 – 2/2.5 Fab 6.375 o
– 26.7 7.875 = 0
Fef = – 50 kN
40 kN
-40
0 -60
-2 26.
-8 . 9 8
.7
-5
Member forces
-1 6
0
1 8. 4 6.1
13.3 kN 26.7 kN
Example 2.26
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown f
40 kN
truss using the method of sections.
8m
8 .2 5
8
d 2
e
SOLUTION 49
8. 4m
6
6 c 8
8 .2 5 2 2m
a b
100 kN
6m 2 2 6m
Determination of Reactions
f
40 kN
Mb =0: Ya 16 + 40 14 – 100 8 = 0
Ya = 15 kN
d
Fy =0 (+): Yb + Ya – 100 = 0 e
Yb = 85 kN s1
s1 c
Xa =40
b
Fx =0 (→+): – Xa + 40 = 0 a
Y a=15 kN 100 kN Yb =85
Xa = 40 kN
Statically determinate trusses 67
Section s1-s1
f
40 kN
66
6
- 93
1 9.
d -48
.3
e
Member forces
6
35.
7 1.
3
8
5.
-1 6.5
-4
c
40 kN 62.3 b
a
100 kN
15 kN 85 kN
EXAMPLE 2.27
Determine the forces in the marked members of the 50 kN
shown truss using a combination of method of sections b c e
and method of joints. 40 kN
9
9 .8 5 4
4m
5
4
3 f
a
d
50 kN
SOLUTION 3m 3m 3m
Determination of Reactions
Mf =0: Ya 9 + 40 4 –50 6 40 kN c
50 kN s1
– 50 3 = 0 ; Ya = 32.2 kN b e
Fy =0 (+): Yf + Ya – 50 –50 = 0
Xf=40
Yf = 67.8 kN a d
s1 f
Fx =0 (→+):
Ya =32.2 kN
– Xf + 40 = 0 50 kN Yf =67.8 kN
Xf = 40 kN
68 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section s1-s1
Fce e
Mf =0: Fce 4 + 50 3 = 0
Fce = -37.5 kN
F bf
Fy (+):
Fad
4/9.85 Fbf + 67.8 – 50 = 0 d 40 kN
f
Fbf = – 43.8 kN
50 kN 67.8 kN
Joint f
F ef
Fy (+): Fef + 67.8 – 4/9.85 43.8 = 0 43.8
Fef = – 50 kN F df 40 kN
f
Fx (→+): – Fdf – 40 + 9/9.85 43.8 = 0 67.8 kN
Fdf = 0
Joint e
50 kN
40 kN 0 -37.5
-4 3
.5
17.8
.5
.8
62
Member forces
-6 2
- 50
37.5 40 kN
0
32.2 kN 50 kN 67.8 kN
EXAMPLE 2.28
Determine the forces in the marked members of g
the shown truss using a combination of method of i 3m
e 30 kN
sections and method of joints. 4
3
5 k 3m
c
1
7 .2
6
4 l 3m
a
b d f h j
SOLUTION 80 kN
6 at 4 m =24 m
Statically determinate trusses 69
Determination of Reactions
Ml =0: Ya 24 – 80 16 s1 g
– 30 6 = 0 ; Ya = 60.8 kN e i
30 kN
c k
Fy =0 (+): Yl + Ya – 80 = 0 Xa =30 l
Yl = 19.2 kN a b d s f
1
h j
Ya =60.8 kN 80 kN Yl=19.2 kN
Fx =0 (→+): Xa – 30 = 0
Xa = 30 kN
Section s1-s1
Joint g
Joint e
-5 6
6. 9 .9
-5
6 8. 3
.4 -3 1 30 kN
01 .9
-1
-6 4
Member forces
-18
-31
80
.1
4 0 0
1. 0 .9
30 kN -1 0 0 0
51.1 51.1 51.1 25.6 25.6 25.6
60.8 kN 80 kN 19.2 kN
70 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.29
Determine the forces in the marked members of f h k
the shown truss using a combination of method of 3
5
3m
c
sections and method of joints. e 4 j m
3m
a n
b d g i l
40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN
6 at 4 m = 24m
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
s1 s2 h k
f
From symmetry: Ya = Yn = 100 kN c j m
e
Xa = 0 n
Fx =0 (→+): Xa = 0 a b d s1 s2 g i l
Ya =100 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN Yn =100
Section s1-s1
f Ffh
Mf = 0: Fdg 6 + 40 4 – 100 8 = 0 c Fef
Fdg = 106.7 kN a Fde
b d F dg
Md = 0: Ffh 6 – 40 4 + 100 8 = 0
100 kN 40 kN 40 kN
Ffh = – 106.7 kN
Joint e
Fef
Feh
Fx (→+): 4/5 Feh + 4/5 Feg = 0
Feh = – Feg ……………………………….(a) e
Feg
F de
Section s2-s2
Joint h
h
Fy (+): – Fhg + 3/5 16.7 + 3/5 16.7 = 0
Fhg = 20 kN 16.7 16.7
F hg
Joint f
Statically determinate trusses 71
80
13
80
- -1 -16
.7
20
-3 3 -1
7 16 66
6. .3 .7 .7 3.
3 .7
16
60
Member forces 6 -3
60
-1
40
40
133.3 133.3 106.7 106.7 133.3 133.3
40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN
100 kN 100 kN
EXAMPLE 2.30
Determine the forces in the marked members of the shown j k
truss using a combination of method of sections and 2.5
method of joints. 7.5 7.5 m
7 . 91
f g h i
9
5.5
5 5m
a 2.5 e
b c d
SOLUTION 100 kN 100 kN 100 kN
4 at 5 m = 20 m
Determination of Reactions
s1
j k
From symmetry: Ya = Ye = 150 kN
s2
Fx =0 (→+): Xa = 0 f g h i
Xa =0
a b s2 s1 c d e
Section s1-s1
F cd
Fx (→+): Fcd + Fjk + 2.5/5.59 Fch = 0 a
Fcd – 80 + 2.5/5.59 55.9 = 0 b c
Fcd = 55 kN 150 kN 100 kN 100 kN
72 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Joint j
Section s2-s2
126.5
Mb =0: Ffg 5 +150 5 – 2.5/7.91 126.5 5
– 7.5/7.91 126.5 2.5= 0 f
Ffg
Ffg = – 50 kN Fbg
a
Fy (+): 5/5.59 Fbg + 150 – 100 – 7.5/7.91 126.5 = 0 b F bc
Fbg = 78.3 kN 150 kN 100 kN
-80
-1 2 6
.5
126
.5
-1 26
126
.5
.5
Member forces
-50 -50
- 16
55
7 .7
9
78 .
.3
5
5 5.
33
33 .
78
.9
7 .7
3
- 16
.5
75 55 55 75
EXAMPLE 2.31
Determine the forces in the marked members of the 40 kN 40 kN
e f g h
shown truss using a combination of method of i
20 kN
sections and method of joints.
2. 5
2 3 . 61 2m
2
1.5 3
c d
1
6 .7
6
4m
3
a b
SOLUTION
3m 1.5 m 1.5 m 3m
Statically determinate trusses 73
Determination of Reactions
Mb =0: Ya 3 + 40 1.5 – 40 3 e
40 kN
f s1 h
40 kN
i
– 20 6 = 0 ; Ya = 60 kN 20 kN g
Fy (+):
c d
Yb – Ya – 40 – 40 = 0
Yb = 140 kN
Fx =0 (→+):
Xa=20 kN
– Xa + 20 = 0
a s1 b
Xa = 20 kN Ya=60 kN Yb =140 kN
Section s1-s1
F fg
Mg =0: Fab 6 + 60 1.5 – 20 6 = 0 e f g
Fab = 5 kN 20 kN
Fcg
c
Mo =0: Ffg 6 + 20 6 + 60 3 = 0
Ffg = – 50 kN 3m
Joint a
F ae F ac
Fx (→+): – 3/6.71 Fae + 5 – 20 = 0
Fae = – 33.5 kN 5
20 kN a
Fy (+): Fac + 6/6.71 Fae – 60 = 0
60 kN
Fac = 90 kN
Joint e
40 kN
20 kN 70 40 kN
-50 -50 70
54
0 .1
75
.1 0 0 -9
-1
25
- 33
Member forces
11 .
.5
-150
90
5
20 kN
60 kN 140 kN
74 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 2.32
Determine the forces in the marked members of the i 4
shown truss using a combination of method of sections h 1
j 1m
10 kN 4 .1 2
4
and method of joints. 5 3
3m
b c d e
a 7
4. 4 2 2m
f g 4
40 kN 20 kN
SOLUTION 4m 4m 4m 4m
Determination of Reactions
Mg =0: Yf 8 + 10 5 + 20 4 10 kN h s1 i j 20 kN
– 40 4 = 0 ; Yf = 3.7 kN
b c d
a e
Fy (+): Yg + Yf – 40 – 20 = 0 s1
f g
Yg = 56.3 kN 40 kN Xg =10 kN
Yf =3.7 kN Yg=56.3
Fx =0 (→+): – Xg + 10 = 0
Xg = 10 kN
Section s1-s1
Joint h
Joint a
-1 1 .6 -1 1 .6
10 kN
-1 20 kN
5.6
Member forces .6 4 .1
-1.9
5.6
-1
3.1 3.1 68.1 68.1
.6
-1.9
5.6
-2 .
1 1 -7 4 -6 3
- 2. .8
10 kN
40 kN
3.7 kN 56.3 kN
EXAMPLE 2.33
Determine the forces in the marked members of the c g k o
r
shown truss using a combination of method of 5m
b f j 11 . n
sections and method of joints. 5
18
5m
e i 10 m q
5m
a p
d h l
200 kN 200 kN 200 kN
SOLUTION
10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m
Determination of Reactions
g s2 s1 k o
c r
From symmetry: Ya = Yp = 300 kN
b f j n
Fx =0 (→+): Xa = 0 i m q
e
a p
Xa =0 s 2 d s1 h l
Ya =300 Yp=300
200 kN 200 kN 200 kN
Joint f
Ffg
Fx (→+): 10/11.18 Ffk + 10/11.18 Ffi = 0 F fk
Ffk + Ffi = 0 ………………………..….….(a) f
Ffi
Fef
Joint i
F ij
Section s2-s2
Md = 0: Fgk 15 + 30010 = 0
Fgk = – 200 kN
Mg = 0: Fad 15 – 300 10 = 0
Fad = 200 kN
Joint d
-33.3
10 0
0
-
-1 00
b 223 f 74. j -7 4 -2 2
5 . n 3.6
.6 5
166. 7
33.3
Member forces
10 0
-200
q
.6 e i m
3 .5 .5 .6
74
23 3.3
16 6.7
-2 2 -7 4 223
-300
1 00
a p
200 d 266.7 h 200 l 0
300 kN 300 kN
200 kN 200 kN 200 kN
EXAMPLE 2.34
Determine the forces in the marked members of d 60 kN 3 g 40 kN
the shown truss using a combination of method of 20 kN c 1
3. 1 6 i
1m
1m
sections and method of joints. f
e h
5
4
3
3m
a b
SOLUTION 3m 3m 3m 3m
Statically determinate trusses 77
Determination of Reactions
Group cdfe
Then, the group cdfe is carrying only a horizontal force. So, the group can be replaced by a link
member as shown in figure.
7 F 0 .5
0. 5 2 27 F
0.3 33 F
F F F F F
0 .5 2 7F
7F 0 .5 2
20 kN
a
b
3.3 kN 103.3 kN
78 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section s1-s1
-10
6.7
5
-1 0. -10. 1 5.8 1 5. 8
5
0
2
-5
-7
4.
9
0
Member forces
.2
-2.5 20 kN
3.3 kN 103.3 kN
EXAMPLE 2.35
Determine the forces in all members of the shown n o p
Determination of Reactions
Mi =0: Ya 24 – 80 18 – 60 15
– 100 12 – 60 9 – 60 3 = 0 n o p
Ya = 177.5 kN k
j l m
Fy (+):
a i
Yi + Ya – 80 – 60 – 100 – 60 Xa =0
b fc g d
h e
– 60 = 0 ; Yi = 182.5 kN 60 kN
Ya=177.5 80 kN 60 kN 100 kN 60 kN
Yi=182.5
Fx =0 (→+): Xa = 0
The given compound truss is subdivided into a primary truss and four secondary trusses as
follow:
Statically determinate trusses 79
j k
-4
2.
-245 -245 0 0
2.
60
-4
0
4
-2
a c e
51
15
c
8
95
0.
0 30 d 30
-2
b 0
.7
.5
13
60
110
-2
0 0 0 30 kN 60 kN 30 kN
-4
.4
51
.4
53
58
2.
2.
0
88
.
60
60
-2
-4
-4
4
1
60
l m
177.5 177.5 207.5 207.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5
4
4
-4
2.
-4
2.
2.
60
60
-4
-4
2.
4
4
e g g i
80 kN 60 kN 100 kN 60 kN 60 kN 30 f 30 30 h 30
177.5 kN 182.5 kN 30 kN 60 kN 30 kN 30 kN 60 kN 30 kN
The secondary trusses are first analyzed by the method of joints, and the forces in their
members are given in the figure. The secondary trusses are supported by the primary truss.
Loads that equal to the reactions of the secondary trusses must be applied at the corresponding
panel points of the primary truss in the opposite direction. For example,
After all the panel-point loads are determined, the primary truss is analyzed by the method of
joints or sections.
The forces in the members of the given compound truss are obtained by algebraic
summation of the forces in the corresponding members of the primary and secondary trusses.
The final member forces are given as follows:
-245 -245
-2
51
15
8
95
0.
-2
.7
.5
13
60
110
-2
-4
.4
51
.4
58
2.
2.
0
88
.
60
60
-2
-4
-4
4
1
60
80 kN 60 kN 100 kN 60 kN 60 kN
177.5 kN 182.5 kN
80 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
The configuration of some trusses can be categorized as neither simple nor compound. For
example, the truss in Fig. 2.4 is a simple, as can be demonstrated by starting with triangle abc
and subsequently expanding the truss by adding two members and one joint at a time to locate
joints e, d, f, and g in that order. If member eb is removed and replaced by member ag, as
shown in Fig. 2.4, a different rigid truss is created that is neither simple nor compound but
complex. Since this truss is statically determinate, the method of joints and the method of
sections can be used for the analysis. In this case, several linear equations should be solved to
get the forces in the members. The solution of this set of equations is somewhat tedious.
An alternative approach is proposed by considering the force in one member of the truss
as P. The forces in other members can now be obtained in terms of P. The value of P can be
determined when resolving the last joint in the truss at which two different expressions of one
member force are found. Once P is calculated, then the forces in all members become known.
This method is illustrated numerically in Example 2.37.
The virtual work method may also be used for solving complex trusses. This method is
proceeded by removing one member and replacing it by another one to change the structure to
a simple truss. The new simple truss can be solved by one or more of the previous method.
Let the forces in the new simple truss, due to the applied forces, be F0. The applied forces are
then removed and two opposite unit loads (X = 1) are applied in the direction of the removed
member. The truss is now resolved for the new case of loading. The system of forces is termed
F1. Let the forces in the new member be F0 and F1 from systems F0 and F1, respectively. To
eliminate the effect of the new member, the final force should be zero. Therefore,
F0 + X F1 = 0 ……………………………………………(2.1)
e g e g
c f c f
d d
a a
b b
(a) (b)
From this condition, the value of X can be determined and consequently the forces in all
members can be easily determined by adding the two sets of forces F0 and X F1 as follow:
F
X = − 0 ………………………………………………(2.2)
F1
F (final) = F0 + X F1 …………………………………….(2.3)
EXAMPLE 2.36
Determine the forces in all members of the shown e f
complex truss. 2m
d g
4m
a c
b
SOLUTION 80 kN
4m 4m 4m 4m
Determination of Reactions
e f
d g
From symmetry: Ya = Yc = 80/2 = 40 kN
Fx =0 (→+): Xa = 0
a c
Xa =0 b
Ya =40 kN 80 kN Yc=40 kN
If member ef is removed and member dg is added, the following simple truss is obtained
e f
0 0
d -80 g
0 0
Member forces (F0)
-40
-40
89 9. 4
.4 8
a 0 0 c
b
40 kN 80 kN 40 kN
This simple truss can be analyzed using the method of joints and the members forces is called
F0
If the actual applied forces are removed and two equal and opposite unit forces are applied at
joints e and f (the ends of the removed member) and in the direction ef. The following internal
forces (F1) can be determined using the method of joints.
59 e 1.0 kN f 0.5
0 .5 59
d -0.50 g
- 0. 5
5 59 59
Member forces (F1) -0 .
0.25
0.25
0 0
0.50 0.50
a c
b
0 0
The final forces (F) in the original truss members are calculated using the following
relationship:
F = F0 + X F 1
82 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
where X is a dimensionless correction factor which is the negative ratio between F0 and F1 of
the added member that is given as follow:
F −80
X = − 0 = − = −160 kN
F
1 dg −0.5
The final internal forces is in the original complex truss is given as follow:
-160 -8 9
.4 .4
- 89
89 .4 89
.4 89 .4
89
.4
-80
-80
Final member forces -80 -80
80 kN 40 kN
40 kN
EXAMPLE 2.37
Determine the forces in all members of the shown 60 kN
complex truss. 10 kN f
10 5m
4
10
.1
e
14
5m
20 kN d
c 20
5 2
2 0.6 5m
SOLUTION
a b
10 m 10 m
Determination of Reactions
60 kN
Mb =0: Ya 20 + 20 5 + 10 15 10 kN f
– 60 10 = 0 ; Ya = 17.5 kN
Fy =0 (+): Yb + Ya – 60 = 0 e
20 kN
Yb = 42.5 kN d
c
Xa =30 kN
Fx =0 (→+): – Xa + 20 +10 = 0 b
a
Xa = 30 kN Ya = 17.5 kN Yb = 42.5 kN
The force in member ad is assumed to be P kN (Fad = P kN). Using the method of joints, the
forces in the other members are determine in terms of P as follows:
Statically determinate trusses 83
Joint d
Joint f
Joint a
It is noticed that member ad has two values. These values are the original estimated value (P)
and the value obtained from Eq. (f) (67 – P). Since the two values must be equal, then
P = 67 – P
Or, P = 33.5 kN
The forces in the members can be obtained by substituting P = 33.5 in Eqs. (a) to (g) as follows:
The force in the remaining member can be obtained by analyzing the forces at joint c as follow:
60 kN
10 kN f
-5
.8
1
-4
-3
6
Final member forces e
-3
.5
d
.
20 kN
-3
-40.6
c
-2 3.1
3 3 .5 2. 6
b
30 kN a
42.5 kN
17.5 kN
Any group of forces in equilibrium, when plotted to scale successively by arrowhead lines,
should form a closed polygon. The external force polygon represents the reactions and external
forces. Each internal force polygon represents the equilibrium of the concurrent forces at each
joint. If the external forces and reactions is reading in a clockwise manner around the outside
of the truss, the internal forces must also be reading in a clockwise manner around each joint.
The procedure for the graphical method of joints is proposed as follows:
1. Assign a number to the space outside the truss that is separated by either a reaction or an
external force, proceeding clockwise around the truss.
2. Assign a number to each triangle within the truss.
3. Begin the construction of the Maxwell diagram by starting with the external forces system,
drawing a line parallel to and in the direction of a known external force and of a length to
represent its magnitude to scale. Proceed around the structure clockwise; the resulting
force polygon should close, as the external force system is in equilibrium.
4. Then applying superposition on the external force line polygon, such as 1-2-3-4-5 in the
next example, and beginning with joint containing only two unknowns, construct line
polygons for each joint in succession until all joints have been treated. At each joint
proceed from force to force clockwise around the joint.
5. To interpret the results, at a given joint a member is designated by two numbers, always
using the sequence obtained by moving clockwise around a joint. The “number-number”
sequence is the same sequence used on the Maxwell diagram to establish the directions of
the forces. The length of the line on the Maxwell diagram is proportional to the magnitude
of the force.
Statically determinate trusses 85
EXAMPLE 2.38
The spaces between external forces and reactions are designated 1-2-3-4-5-1 clockwise
around the truss, so the force vector 1-2-3-4-5-1 forms a closed polygon. The four internal
triangles are numbered 6-7-8-9. These numbers are determined in the Maxwell diagram in
succession; for instance, point 6 is the intersection of 1-6 parallel to member ac and 2-6 parallel
to member ce.
The magnitude of each of axial force may be measured from the force diagram and its
direction acting on the joint (tension-compression) is determined by the indicated direction
when proceeding from point to point on the Maxwell diagram according to the name of the
member obtained by reading in a clockwise pattern around a joint of the truss diagram. For
example,
1 5
2
e f
20 kN 8
6
30 kN
6 9 4
c d 7
1 7
3 8
30 kN a b 2 3
5 4
12.5 kN 7.5 kN
External forces
9
e 15 f
21
20 kN
.
14
2.
-15
-9
-2.5
30 kN
Member forces c d
-1
.2
4
21
.1
30 kN 20
a b
12.5 kN 7.5 kN
EXAMPLE 2.39
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.19 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
11 1
5 e
c g
7 10
11 9
6 8 9 h 2
a b d f
4 3 2 1 7,10
5
30 kN 20 kN 20 kN 20 kN 30 kN
8 3
External forces
6 4
-40 -40
-1 6 -5 0
- 50 6 .7 .7
30
30
20
-1
Member forces
40 53.3 53.3 40
20 kN 20 kN 20 kN
30 kN 30 kN
EXAMPLE 2.40
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.21 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
Statically determinate trusses 87
6 3
50 kN 80 kN
3 4 5 7
c e g
a
6 8 10
7 9 8 4
93.3 kN 76.7kN 1
b f
2 d 1
40 kN
9
2
External forces
5
10
Maxwell force diagram
50 kN 80 kN
4
13
-3
.9
3.
8.
5.
2
0
-3
10
1
1
.2
-4
1 2 0 .9
1 2 6 .4
93.3 kN 76.7 kN
40 kN
EXAMPLE 2.41
Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss
80 kN e
by the graphical method of joints c g 2m
7m
a h
b d f
SOLUTION 100 kN 60 kN
7m 7m 7m 7m
11 1
4
80 kN e 5
c g
9 2
7 10
4
6 8 9 11
a h
10
b d f
3 2 1
125 kN 100 kN 60 kN 115 kN 5
External forces 7
8 6 3
80 kN -130 -119 .6
-2
8
Member forces
-1
8
1.
8.
6.
82.1
62
100
9.3
-1
1
7
.
-1
6
125 132.2 132.2 115
100 kN 60 kN
125 kN 115 kN
EXAMPLE 2.42
Determine the forces in the members of the truss in Example 2.28 by the graphical method of
joints
SOLUTION
11
g
e i 12,13
4 10
30 kN 9
14,15
11 1
c k 5
8 13
30 kN 6 7 9 12 14 15 l 4
d
3,5
a b f h j
3 1
2
60.8 kN 80 kN 19.2 kN
External forces
10
2
6,7,8
9 -56
6. .9
-5 30 kN
68.3
.4
01 - 31
.9
-1
-6
-1 8
80
.4 0 -31
4
Member forces
.1
01 0 0 .9
30 kN -1 0 0
51.1 51.1 51.1 25.6 25.6 25.6
60.8 kN 80 kN 19.2 kN
EXAMPLE 2.43
Determine the forces in the members of the truss in Example 2.18 by the graphical method of
joints
SOLUTION
Statically determinate trusses 89
d 20 kN 1 2
5 6
40 kN c
4 10 2 40 kN
9 11
80 kN 10 kN
a b
3 e 12 f
60 kN 1
7
g 10 kN 4,9
8 5 6
3
100 kN
External forces
10 12 11
7 8
20 kN
.7
-4 4
33
-86.7
40 kN
1
.3
3.
40 kN
Member forces
11
-20
0
80 kN -10
80 10 kN
.7
-86.7
-1 6
60 kN
10 kN
100 kN
EXAMPLE 2.44
Determine the forces in the members of the truss in Example 2.14 by the graphical method of
joints.
SOLUTION
7 8
h
5 6
8 9 g
e 1 4
f
2 7
6 50 kN
c d 3 2
5
4
a b
25 kN 1 75 kN
External forces 3 9
70
.7
-10 0
.7
70
-50
-50
Member forces
.3
23
-1 00
37
.6
50 kN
-16.7
-8 3 .3
15
28
-12.5
25 kN 75 kN
EXAMPLE 2.45
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.20 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
6
10 kN
k
j 7 1,9
14
5
13 15
10 kN g h i
4 11
10 kN 10 12
f 10 12
d e 8
3
7 8
Xa=30 kN 9
c
a b 15
2 11,13
1
Ya=22.5 kN Yc=22.5 kN 2,6
3 4 5 14
-3.8
2
10 kN -5 -10
Member forces -12
11.3
.5
-11.3
.5
12
10 kN 5 -15
-18
22.5
-22.5
.8 .8
18
30 kN 30 0
22.5 kN 22.5 kN
Statically determinate trusses 91
EXAMPLE 2.46
Determine the forces in the members of the shown 50 kN
f
truss by the graphical method of joints. 100 kN
3m
e g
1.5 m
d 1.5 m
a b c
SOLUTION 80 kN
5.2 m 5.2 m 5.2 m 5.2 m
10,11
f 50 kN
5
100 kN 6 4 3
4 e g 1
8 9 10
7 11
50 kN b c d 9 2
a 2 1
3 5 6
80 kN
80.6 kN 99.4 kN
7
External forces
8
80 kN
80.6 kN 99.4 kN
EXAMPLE 2.47
Determine the forces in the members of the shown 30 kN h i j 10 kN
truss by the graphical method of joints. 3m
c f g
d e
4m
SOLUTION a 80 kN b
3m 8m 8m 3m
1 11
3,6 7
30 kN h 4 i j 10 kN
9 10
7 8 11 12
c g
6 d e f 13 4
2 1
5 9,10
3 a 80 kN 5,13 12
b
73.8 kN 46.2 kN
2 8
External forces
Maxwell force diagram
92 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
30 kN h -86.7 i -86.7 j 10 kN
12 4 2
14
.4
10 3.
-73.8
-46.2 -4 6.3
.6
0
42
.1
-10 g
c
-30 d -30 e -10 f
Member forces
-73.8
0
0
a 80 kN b
73.8 kN 46.2 kN
EXAMPLE 2.48
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.16 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
2 3
100 kN 4 100 kN 8
d f 5
e
c 9 10 h
3 8 11
7
7 b g 12
71.4 kN 71.4 kN
10
a 1 1 4
2 i 6 9
100 kN 100 kN 12
External forces
11
6 5
100 kN 100 kN
-9 3.7 -93 .7
-93 .7 -9 3.7
-100
-100
5 27
102 2 7. .5 10 2
.7
-64.3
-64.3
Member forces .7
.9 - 79
-7 9 .9
71.4 kN 71.4 kN
100 kN 100 kN
EXAMPLE 2.49
Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss by the 10 kN i 20 kN
graphical method of joints. 20 kN 4 m 4m
4m
e g h
f
4m
c d
4m
SOLUTION a b
9m 9m
Statically determinate trusses 93
10 kN 2 3
i
20 kN 5 20 kN
4
f 13 g
e h
9 11 12
10 13 10,11
3 c d 6 1,8
8
10 kN b 20 kN
a 5 12
2 1 7 4 9
13.3 kN 26.7 kN
External forces
7 6
Maxwell force diagram
10 kN i
20 kN 20 kN
-8
3
.3
8.
5 f 5 g 5
e h
-20 .6
0
-8
8 .3
6
.3
-2 0 .
Member forces -20
c d
.7
-3
0
-16
3.
3
10 kN 20 kN
a b
13.3 kN 26.7 kN
EXAMPLE 2.50
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.33 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
1 4
e g
c 8 9 h
2 6
7 f
120 kN
5
d
3
4
a b 5
1 7
270 kN 390 kN
2 8,9
6
External forces
30
-7
3 120 kN
5
4.
.9
3
-210
30 1
Member forces -2
25
-2
-135
270 kN 390 kN
EXAMPLE 2.51
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.29 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
19 1
17
7 h 2
f k 18
12 16
c 10 13 14 j 17 m 15
e 3
8 14
9 11 15 18 19 n 12,16
a 7
b d g i l 13
6 5 4 3 2 1 4
11
100 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 100 kN
9
5
External forces
10
8 6
3 .3
-13
80
-1 .7
20
-3 -1 6
.7 3. 3 1 6. .3
Member forces 66 7 .7 -3 3
6 .7
-1
60
16
40
60
40
40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN 40 kN
100 kN 100 kN
EXAMPLE 2.52
Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss e i l
by the graphical method of joints. c g k n 3m
p 3m
a
b d f h j m o
SOLUTION
50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN
8 at 4 m 32 m
Statically determinate trusses 95
23 1
21
22 2
e i 16
l 9 19
15 20 3
c 12 g 16 17 k 21 n
a 10 11 13 14 18 19 22 23 p 18 4
b d f h j m o 9
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 15,20 5
14
175 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 175 kN
6
13
17
External forces 11 7
12
10 8
-2 0 0
6 5 -2
.7 -4 1 1 20 2
91 . 7 25 8.
3 08 .3 1 2 5 1.7 91
.7
Member forces 2 1 -4
50
50
50
50
- 2
233.3 233.3 100 100 100 100 233.3 233.3
50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN
175 kN
175 kN
EXAMPLE 2.53
Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss by the graphical method of joints.
e i m
c o 3m
g k
a p 3m
b d f h j l n
SOLUTION 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN
8 at 4 m = 32 m
23 1
21
9 22 2
e i m
14 19 20
c 12 16 17 k 21 o 3
g 20
10 11 13 15 18 22 23 p 16 18
a b d f h j l 2 n 4
8 7 6 5 4 3 1 14,19 9
15
17 5
175 kN 50 kN 50 kN50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 50 kN 175 kN
13 6
External forces 11 7
12
10 8
-300 -300
50 1 41 -2 5
-2 25 .7 .7 0
418
-50
5
75
.7 - 29
91
-4 1
.7 3 .3 . 3 12 1 .7 1. 7
83
50
Member forces -2 4
50
75
-
50
50
EXAMPLE 2.54
Determine the forces in the members of the shown truss e g j
by the graphical method of joints. c d h k 5m
l5m
a
b f i
100 kN 200 kN 100 kN
4 at 10 m = 40 m
SOLUTION
The force in member eg is first determined by the method of section. In this case, this force is
considered as an external force in the Maxwell diagram.
16 1
14 15
300 300 g 7
e j
6 12 13 2
5 c 10 15 k
d h
9 14
8 11 13 16 l
a
b
6,12 5,7
f i
4 3 2 1
200 kN 100 kN 200 kN 100 kN 200 kN
11
3
External forces 9 10
8 4
21
12
1
12
2.
2.
.1
-2
21
-100 0 -100
1
14
-2
4
Member forces
1.
8
8
1.
.7
2.
.7
2.
14
70
70
70
8
70
8
-2
.7
.7
EXAMPLE 2.55
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.24 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
The force in member bc is first determined by the method of section. In this case, this force is
considered as an external force in the Maxwell diagram.
Statically determinate trusses 97
3 2,4
20 kN
20 kN i
5 6
4 e 11 12 h
5 kN f g
10 13
3 8
9 14
5 kN d
a b 11.7 11.7 c 5
2 7 10
1 11
28.3 kN 11.7 kN
External forces 8 1,7,14
9
13 6,12
Maxwell force diagram
20 kN
20 kN
-5 . 3 0
-1
5 kN
.4
6.
-9
-6.7 -11.7
Member forces
-28.3
-6.7
-11.7
-11.7
5
9.
.
16
4
5 kN 5 11.7 0
28.3 kN 11.7 kN
EXAMPLE 2.56
Determine the forces in the members of the truss given in Example 2.30 by the graphical
method of joints.
SOLUTION
The force in member jk is first determined by the method of section. In this case, this force is
considered as an external force in the Maxwell diagram.
14 1
80 kN 80 kN 15
13
j k
6 7
5
11 15
12 2
f g h i
9 13
8 10 12 14 6 5,7
b 1 e
a
4 3 c 2
d
150
10 3
150 kN 100 kN 100 kN 100 kN
External forces
9
11
8 4
-80
.5
-12 6
1 26 .
.5
-1 2 6
126
.5
5
-50 -50
Member forces
.3
7.7
.9
78
-1 6
.5
3 3.
5 5.
78
55
33
.3
- 16
7
5
.7
75 55 55 75
Problems
Find graphically and analytically the forces in all members for the following trusses:
b d
100 kN e
d f
2m
4.5 m c h 2m
5m
e b g
a i 5m
a c
40 kN 20 kN 100 kN
6m 6m 4 at 10 m = 40m
(1) (2)
100 kN
40 kN
f h
8m
d e 40 kN d
f 1.5 m
b
3m
8m a g
c e
80 kN
a c
b 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m
4m 4m 4m 4m
(3) (4)
j h k
10 kN
d e g 1.5 m
h
10 kN i
10 m 10 kN g
b 1.5 m
j
20 kN c f i f
10 m 10 kN d e
a k 1.5 m
a c
10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m
2m 2m
(5) (6)
20 kN
40 kN
20 kN c
i d
5 kN 2m 1.5 m
f g h b
e e
4m 2m
a f
a d
b c
4m 2m 2m 4m 2m 3.5 m 2m
(7) (8)
100 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
50 kN
g 40 kN b c e
e 3m 40 kN
i
c k 3m 4m
f l 3m
a f
b d h j a
d
80 kN 50 kN
6 at 4 m =24 m 3m 3m 3m
(9) (10)
40 kN 60 kN 40 kN g h
g h 20 kN f i
f
6m 5m
a e a e
b d b c d
6m
c 100 kN 100 kN 100 kN
4 at 5 m = 20 m
6 at 4 m =24 m
(11) (12)
b d
10 kN i
20 kN 40 kN
40 kN 4m 4m 4m
2m
c e f g h
e 2m 4m
i c d
a
f g h 4m
40 kN 40 kN a b
3m 1.5 m 1.5 m 3m
9m 9m
(13) (14)
d 60 kN g 20 kN i
c 1m h j 1m
i
10 kN f 1m c 2m
e h a b d e1 m
k 3m
2m
a j b f 40 kN g
20 kN 20 kN
3m 3m 3m 3m 4m 4m 4m 4m
(15) (16)
20 kN h j 10 kN
b d f h j l
e 3m
c g
d f 3m
4m a g
c e i k
a 80 kN b
40 kN 80 kN 40 kN
3m 8m 8m 3m 5 at 4 m = 20 m
(17) (18)
Statically determinate trusses 101
e
80 kN 80 kN 20 kN
40 kN
d e g i k
4m
f 30 kN
20 kN b l
4m
c
1.5 m
c f j
4m b d 2.5 m
a h a g
60 kN
6 at 5 m = 30m 4m 2 m 2 m 2 m2 m 4m
(19) (20)
102 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
3
Statically Determinate Beams
and Frames
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Beams and frames are defined as flexural structures. The members of these structures can
carry external loads through their internal resistance against shears and moments. With flexural
members, it is not sufficient to know only the member-end forces because the member forces
may vary along the length of the member. If the internal member forces are desired at a
specified location, it is necessary to cut the structure at that position and determine the internal
forces at the cut surface to equilibrate the resulting free-body diagrams. To determine the
internal forces acting across any section of a beam subjected to some random loads (Fig. 3.1a),
the beam is cut at the desired section.
R Ax
B
A C
RAy R By
M M
RAx A N N
B
Q C
CQ
RAy R By
(b) Free body for left portion (c) Free body for right portion
Shear is defined as an internal force acting in the plane and through the centroid of the
section and it has units of a force. Bending moment is defined as an internal couple acting
about a cross-sectional centroidal axis; it acts in a plane normal to the section and has units of
force distance. Axial force is defined as an internal force acting at the centroid of the section
and along an axis normal to the section. The sign conventions for shear, moment, and axial
force, as applied to beams, as shown in Fig. 3.2.
N N
Q Q M M
A graph showing a plot of shear force versus the longitudinal distance along a slender
structural member, as beam, is called a shear-force diagram (SFD); similarly, a graph showing
the variation of bending moment along the length of a member is called a bending moment
diagram (BMD). The same definition applies to normal-force diagram (NFD).
When the internal forces are to be determined at a given point in a beam or frame structure,
the same general technique that was used in trusses is employed. That is, a free-body diagram
is taken which cuts through the structure at the desired location, and each unknown internal
force is assumed to act in the positive direction. The analysis proceeds, and if it produces a
positive value for the unknown, then the assumed direction is correct and the internal force is
indeed positive. If, however, the analysis yields a negative value for the unknown, then the
assumed direction is incorrect and the internal force is negative.
In this approach, a separate free-body diagram (FBD) must be considered for each point
on the structure, where the internal forces are desired. The point may be explicitly defined, or
it may be given as variable location. The analysis for each case gives the desired internal forces
at that cut section.
EXAMPLE 3.1
Determination of Reactions
30 kN
The reactions have been already determined in 20 kN 50 kN
Example 1.12 and given as shown b e
a c d
Yb =73.3 Ye =26.7
Section 1
Py = 0 (+): – 20 + 73.3 – Q1 = 0 20 kN
Q1 = 53.3 kN Q1
a M1
3m b
Mb = 0: M1 + 20 3 = 0
M1 = – 60 kN.m 73.3
Section 2
Py = 0 (+): – 20 + 73.3 – Q2 = 0 20 kN
Q2 = 53.3 kN b Q2
a M2
c
3m 3m
Mc = 0: M2 + 20 6 – 73.3 3 = 0
M2 = 100 kN.m 73.3
Section 3
Py = 0 (+): Q3 – 30 + 26.7 = 0 Q 3 30 kN
Q3 = 3.3 kN d e
M3 4m
Md = 0: M3 – 26.7 4 = 0 26.7
M3 = 106.7 kN.m
53.3 60
a c d e
a b 3.3 e b
c d
-20 -20 -26.7 -26.7 BMD
SFD 100 106.7
EXAMPLE 3.2
Determination of Reactions
30 kN
12 kN/m 10 kN/m
Xa=0 a b c d e
Ya =28.7 kN Yd=57.3 kN
Px = 0: (→+) Xa = 0
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
20
28.7 20
b c a b c
d e
a d e
-7.3
SFD 17.3 BMD
-37.3 32
EXAMPLE 3.3
40 kN/m
Determine the shear force, and bending moment at the 1 2 60 kN.m
a d
indicated sections for the beam structure shown. b 1m c
3m 2m 1m
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
40 kN/m 60 kN.m
The reactions have been already determined in d
Example 1.13 and given as shown a c
b
Ya = 40 kN Yd = 20 kN
Section 1
Section 2
Py = 0 (+): Q2 + 20 = 0 Q 2 60 kN.m
Q2 = – 20 kN d
c
M2 1m 1m
M2 = 0: M2 + 60 – 20 2 = 0
20
M2 = – 20 kN.m
40
40
a b c d a b c d
EXAMPLE 3.4
40 kN 60 kN
Determine the axial force, shear force, and bending 10 kN/m
4
moment at the indicated sections for the beam structure a 3 f
b 1 d 2 e
shown. 1m
3m 1m 2m 2m 3m
SOLUTION
Determination of Reactions
40 kN 48 kN
The reactions have been already determined in 10 kN/m
Xa=36 kN 36 kN
Example 1.14 and given as shown a d e f
b
Ya =33.9 kN Ye =104.1 kN
Section 1
Px = 0 (→+): – 36 + N1 = 0 40 kN
M1
N1 = 36 kN 36 kN b 1
a 3m 1 m N1
Q1
Py = 0 (+): 33.9 – 40 – Q1 = 0
33.9 kN
Q1 = – 6.1 kN
M1 = 0: M1 – 33.9 4 + 40 1 = 0
M1 = 95.5 kN.m
Section 2
Px = 0 (→+): N2 = 0 Q2 10 kN/m
N2
2 e f
Py = 0 (+): Q2 + 104.1 – (10 4) = 0 M2 1m 3m
Q2 = – 64.1 kN 104.1
M2 = 0: M2 – 104.1 1 + (10 4) 2 = 0
M2 = 24.1 kN.m
36 36
33.9 33.9 30
b d
a -6.1 -6.1 e f
a b d e f
NFD SFD
-54.1 -74.1
45
a b d
e f
BMD
83.3
101.6
EXAMPLE 3.5
30 kN
2 3 15 kN/m 4 60 kN
Determine the normal force, shearing force, and
bending moment at the indicated sections for the e
c 1 b d 5
loaded structure shown in the figure. 2m
30 kN
2m
a
SOLUTION
2m 4m 2m 2m
Determination of Reactions
The reaction components at a and e are determined using the equilibrium conditions.
30 kN 60 kN
15 kN/m
e
c b d
56.3 kN
30 kN
a
30 kN
123.8 kN
Section 1
N1
M1
Py = 0 (+): 123.8 + N1 = 0
b Q1
N1 = – 123.8 kN 2m
Px = 0 (→+): 30 – 30 + Q1 = 0 30 kN
2m
Q1 = 0 a
30 kN
123.8 kN
Mb = 0: M1 – 30 2 + 30 4 = 0
M1 = – 60 kN.m
Section 2
Py = 0 (+): – 30 – 15 2 – Q2 = 0
Q2 = – 60 kN 30 kN
15 KN/m M2
Px = 0 (→+): N2 = 0 N2
c b
Q
Mb = 0: M2 + 30 2 + (15 2) 1 = 0 2m 2
M2 = – 90 kN.m
Section 3
60 kN
M3 Q 3 15 kN/m
N3 e
90 M3 b d
b
56.3 kN
60 4m 2m 2m
Py = 0 (+): Q3 – 15 4 – 60 + 56.3 = 0
Q3 = 63.8kN
Px = 0 (→+): N3 = 0
Mb = 0 M3 = 90 – 60 = 30 kN.m
Section 4
Py = 0 (+): Q4 – 60 + 56.3 = 0 Q4
60 kN
Q4 = 3.7 kN N4 e
M4 d
Px = 0 (→+): N4 = 0 56.3 kN
2m 2m
Md = 0: M4 + 60 2 – 56.3 4 = 0
M4 = 105 kN.m
Section 5
Py = 0 (+): Q5 – 60 + 56.3 = 0 Q5 60 kN
Q5 = 3.7 kN N5 e
M5 5
56.3 kN
Px = 0 (→+): N5 = 0 2m
M5 = 0: M5 – 56.3 2 = 0
M5 = 112.5 kN.m
EXAMPLE 3.6
10 kN 15 kN
10 kN/m 3
Determine the normal force, shearing force, and bending 1 d
b e
moment at the indicated sections for the loaded structure shown a
2 20 kN.m 4
in the figure.
4m
SOLUTION
5 6
c
2m 1m 1m 2m
10 kN 15 kN
10 kN/m
The reaction components at c are determined by
considering the equilibrium conditions. 20 kN.m
25 kN.m
Section 1 45 kN
Py = 0 (+): Q1 – 15 = 0 M1
15 kN
Q1 = 15 kN Q1
N1
b 2m a
Px = 0 (→+): N1 = 0
Mb = 0: M1 + 15 2 = 0
M1 = – 30 kN.m
Section 2
25
s
25 Co 10 kN/m
Si
25
n
e
b d
30 kN.m 20 kN.m
M2 Sin =
Cos =
c
25 kN.m
Joint b
45 kN
Force components at b
Q2 = – 25 Cos ϴ = – 25 0.6
Q2 = – 15kN
N2 = – 25 Sin ϴ = – 25 0.8
N2 = – 20 kN
Considering the moment equilibrium at joint b,
Mb = 0 M2 = 30 kN.m
Section 3
Py = 0 (+): – 10 2 – Q3 = 0 e 10 kN/m d M3
Q3 = – 20 kN N3
20 kN.m 2 m Q3
Px = 0 (→+): N2 = 0
Mb = 0: M3 + 20 + (10 2) 1 = 0
M3 = – 40 kN.m
Section 4
Statically determinate beams and frames 113
20
10 kN 20
Co
15 kN in
S
s
40 kN.m 20
d
M4
Sin =
Cos =
Joint d 25 kN.m
45 kN
Force components at d
Q4 = 20 Cos ϴ = 20 0.6
Q4 = 12 kN
N4 = – 20 Sin ϴ = – 20 0.8
N4 = – 16 kN
M4 = 40 kN.m
Section 5
10 kN 15 kN
Considering the equilibrium of part abc,
b a
Since member bc is unloaded, then the shear and normal forces at c
(section 5) are the same as those at b (section 2). Therefore,
Q5 = – 15 kN and N5 = – 20 kN M5
c
25 kN
2m 1m
Considering the moment equilibrium for part abc,
M5 = 0: M5 – 15 1 – 10 3= 0
M5 = 45 kN.m
114 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section 6
Q6 = 12 kN and N6 = – 16 kN
c M6
Considering the moment equilibrium of part cde,
40 kN
1m 2m
Mc = 0: M6 + 20 – (10 2) 2= 0
M6 = 20 kN.m
EXAMPLE 3.7
1 e
a
SOLUION 3m 3m 3m 3m
15 kN 40 kN 30 kN.m
The reaction components at a and e are determined d
by considering the equilibrium conditions and the c b
condition equation at b,
40 kN
f
14.1 kN 25.9 kN
e
a
15.4 kN 39.6 kN
Section 1
Q1 = 20.5 kN
s
39.6 kN
s
Co
15.4
n
Si
.1
.4
14
15
Section 2
15.4 kN
Considering the equilibrium of part af
14.1 kN
f
The shear and normal forces at section 2 are the same as
M2
those at joint a, then 4m
14.1 kN
Q2 = 20.5 kN and N2 = – 3.9 kN a
15.4 kN
Mf = 0: M2 – 15.4 3 – 14.1 4 = 0 3m
M2 = 102.5 kN.m
Section 3
15 kN 40 kN 30 kN.m 15 kN 40 kN 30 kN.m
25
.9
Si
n
Sin = Sin =
25.9 15 Cos = Q3 Cos =
.4 3 M3
Co
Si
N3
.4 o s
s
15.4
1 5 .9 C
n
25.9 kN 25.9 kN
25
39.6 kN 39.6 kN
Section 4
Py = 0 (+): Q4 = 0
Q4 30 kN.m
N4
Px = 0 (→+): N4 = 0
M4
b d
3m
Mb = 0: M4 = – 30 kN.m
Section 5
3 9 .9 C
25
.6
39.6
Si s
s
Co
n
9 .6
o
30 kN.m 3
25.9
b d n
9 Si b
2 5.
M5 Sin =
Cos =
Joint b
25.9 kN
e
39.6 kN
Forces components at b
M5 = 30 kN.m
EXAMPLE 3.8
20 kN/m
Determine the normal force, shearing force, and f
40 kN e
bending moment at the indicated sections for the loaded d 2m
structure shown in figure. 20 kN
b c 1m
g
h
1m 3m
a i
1m 3m 4m 2m
SOLUTION
20 kN/m
The reaction components at a and i are determined
using the equilibrium conditions and the condition 40 kN e f
d
equation given by hinge at d.
b c 20 kN
g
h
10.2 kN 10.2 kN
a i
73.8 kN 126.2 kN
Section 1
4m
Px = 0 (→+): Q1 + 10.2 = 0
Q1 = – 10.2 kN 10.2 kN
a
Mc = 0: M1 – 10.2 4 = 0 73.8 kN
M1 = 40.8 kN.m
Section 2
Py = 0 (+): – 40 - Q2 = 0
Q2 = – 40 kN 40 kN
Q2 M
2
Px = 0 (→+): N2 = 0 b c N2
1m
Mc = 0: M2 + 40 1 = 0
M2 = – 40 kN.m
118 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Section 3
20 kN/m
10
.2
S in
d e f
c
M3 10.2 20 kN
40 kN.m
33
S in s g
.8
c .8 o h
Co
33 . 2 C 33.8
s
40.8 kN.m 1 0
10.2 kN
Sin = i
Cos = 126.2 kN
Joint c
Force components at c
Section 4
Py = 0 (+): Q4 – 20 2 = 0
Q4 = 40 kN M4 Q4 20 kN/m
N4
e 2m f
Px = 0 (→+): N4 = 0
Me = 0: M4 + (20 2) 1 = 0
M4 = – 40 kN.m
Section 5
M5 = – 41.2 kN.m
Statically determinate beams and frames 119
Section 6
Q 6 20 kN/m
N6
e f
M6
M6 40 kN.m 20 kN 2m
e g
h
41.2 kN.m
10.2 kN
i
126.2 kN
Joint e
Section 6
Py = 0 (+): Q6 – 20 – 20 2 + 126.2 = 0
Q6 = – 66.2 kN
Px = 0 (→+): – N6 – 10.2 = 0
N6 = –10.2 kN
EXAMPLE 3.9
45
al
Determine the normal force, shearing force, and bending o nH
/ m
1 2 kN 30 kN 1.5 m
moment at the indicated sections for the loaded structure 20 kN
13
d
1.5 m
shown in figure. c b 2 e 10 kN
4m
a f
2m 6m 4m
SOLUTION
The reaction components at a and f are determined using the equilibrium conditions.
120 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
l
Ha
on
kN /m d 30 kN
20 kN 12
10 kN
c b e
40 kN
a f
94.9 kN 2.9 kN
Section 1
Py = 0 (+): – Q1 – 20 = 0 20 kN
Q1 = – 20 kN Q1 M1
c N1
Px = 0 (→+): N1 = 0 2m b
Mb = 0: M1 + 20 2 = 0
M1 = – 40 kN.m
Section 2
Section 3
7 4.
74.9
S in
9C
74 . 9
os
40 C
os
20 kN
40
40 kN.m c
40
b
M3
S
b
in
Q3 = 49.1 kN
Section 5
Q5 2
4 0 . 9 S i 2.9
s
N5 Co n
Co
s
d
2.9
30 kN 1.5 m
M5
40
1.5 m d 30 kN
q
e 10 kN
S in
40
e 10 kN
4m
f Sin =
2.9 kN Cos =
f
2.9 kN
4m
Md = 0: M5 – 30 1.5 – 10 3 – 2.9 4 = 0
M5 = 86.6 kN.m
Section 4
2. 9
2.9
S in
Co
2 .9 s
s
Co
al 40
o nH 40
40
20 kN k N/ m d
12
S in
M4 86.6 kN.m
c b
d
Sin =
Cos =
40 kN
a
Joint d
94.9 kN
M4 = 86.6 kN.m
EXAMPLE 3.10
5 8 6
30 kN/m
Determine the normal force, shearing force, and d
g
4
bending moment at the indicated sections for the 20 kN e 7
f 2m
loaded structure shown in figure. 2 b3
c
2 0 kN/m
1
2m
a h
2m
i
1m 2m 6m 2m
SOLUTION
30 kN/m
The reaction components at a and i are d
20 kN g
determined using the equilibrium conditions and the e f 20 kN/m
condition equations given by hinges at e and h. c b
47.5 kN
a h
155 kN 72.5 kN
i
105 kN.m
165 kN
Section 1
Py = 0 (+): N1 + 155 = 0 M1
N1
N1 = –155 kN
b Q
1
2 m
Px = 0 (→+): Q1 + 47.5 = 0 47.5 kN
a
Q1 = – 47.5 kN
155 kN
Mb = 0: M1 – 47.5 2 = 0
M1 = 95 kN.m
Statically determinate beams and frames 123
Section 2
Py = 0 (+): – 20 – Q2 = 0
Q2 = – 20 kN 20 kN
Q 2 M2
Px = 0 (→+): N2 = 0 c b N2
1m
Mb = 0: M2 + 20 1 = 0
M2 = – 20 kN.m
Section 3
N3
20 kN M3
M3 c b Q3
20 kN.m
b 47.5 kN
a
95 kN.m
155 kN
Joint b Section 3
Py = 0 (+): N3 – 20 + 155 = 0
N3 = – 135 kN
Px = 0 (→+): Q3 + 47.5 = 0
Q3 = – 47.5 kN
M3 = 20 + 95 = 115 kN.m :
Section 4
Section 5
Q 5 M5
N5
d
M5 20 kN 2m
d c b
1m 2m
210 kN.m a
47.5 kN
155 kN
Joint d
Section 5
Py = 0 (+): – Q5 – 20 + 155 = 0
Q5 = 135 kN
Px = 0 (→+): N5 + 47.5 = 0
N5 = – 47.5 kN
M4 = 210 kN.m
Section 6
Py = 0 (+): Q6 – 30 2 = 0
Q6 = 60 kN
Q6 30 kN/m
Px = 0 (→+): N6 = 0 N6 g
M6 f
2m
Mf = 0: M6 + (30 2) 1 = 0
M6 = – 60 kN.m
Section 7
Px = 0 (→+): Q7 – 20 6 + 72.5 = 0 6m
h
Q7 = 47.5 kN
72.5 kN
i
Mf = 0: M7 + (20 6) 3 + 105 – 72.5 6= 0 105 kN.m
M7 = – 30 kN.m 165 kN
Statically determinate beams and frames 125
Section 8
2m
Q 8 30 kN/m
N8 g
f
M8
20 kN/m
M8 60 kN.m
6m
h
f
72.5 kN
30 kN.m i
105 kN.m
Joint f 165 kN
Section 8
Py = 0 (+): Q8 – 30 2 + 165 = 0
Q8 = – 105 kN
Px = 0 (→+): – N8 + 72.5 – 20 6 = 0
N8 = – 47.5 kN
M8 = 60 + 30 = 90 kN.m
To develop the necessary relationships, consider the beam shown in Fig. 3.3a, which is
subjected to a distributed transverse load of varying intensity w(x). For differential element of
length x isolated from the beam by two parallel sections at x and x + x, and if all forces and
moments acting on the element, are defined, then a free body for the element will result as
shown in Fig. 3.3b.
wa . x
. x
w(x)
w w + w
a b Q Q + Q
x x
M O M + M
L
Loaded beam x
Small element
The relationships are obtained from the application of the equations of static equilibrium to the
element of Fig. 3.3b. Horizontal equilibrium is automatically satisfied and the summation of
forces in the vertical direction yields
where wa is the average load intensity over the element. This relationship leads to
Q
= wa
x
having x → 0, we find
Q dQ
lim = = w ……………………………………(3.1)
x →0 x dx
Eq. (3.1) means that the rate of change of shear (slope of the shear curve) at a point is equal to
the numerical value of the transverse distributed load at that point. Thus the shear is constant
when w = 0 and the shear diagram is linear when w is constant. In general, shear equation will
always be one degree higher than the equation for the transverse distributed load.
x2 x
dQ 2
dx
x1
dx = wdx
x1
x2
Q2 − Q1 = wdx ………………………………………(3.2)
x
which means that the difference in the ordinates of the shear curve between any two sections
is equal numerically to the total transverse loads applied between the two sections.
M + ( Q . x ) + ( wa .x )( . x ) − ( M + M ) = 0
or,
M
= Q + ( wa . .x )
x
As x approaches 0 in the limit, the term (wa . . x) vanishes, and the resulting differential
equation is
dM
= Q ……………………………………………...(3.3)
dx
which means that the slope of the moment curve at any point is equal to the intensity of the
shear force at that point. Here, the moment equation will be one degree higher than the shear
Statically determinate beams and frames 127
x2
M2 − M1 = Qdx ………………….……………………..(3.4)
x1
which means that the difference in the ordinates of the moment curve between any two sections
is equal to the area under the shear curve between the two sections, provided no concentrated
moments act between those sections.
EXAMPLE 3.11
P
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the a c
b
beam shown.
a b
L
SOLUTION
P
a c
b
Pb/L Pa/L
Pb/L Pb/L
a b c
b c
a
-Pa/L -Pa/L Pab /L
Between a and b the load intensity is zero, so the shear is constant and equal to Pb/L. Similarly,
in the distance between b and c, the load is zero and then, the shear is constant and equal to -
Pa/L
Between a and b the shear is constant and therefore the bending moment diagram is linear. The
slope of bending moment diagram between a and b equal to the shear force in the same zone
according to Eq. (3.3). So, from a to b, the slope of bending moment diagram is given as
128 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
dM Pab / L Pb
dx = =
a→b a L
which is the same value of shear force between a and b. Similarly, the slope of bending moment
diagram between b and c is given as
dM Pab / L Pa
dx =− =−
b →c b L
EXAMPLE 3.12
P
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the a b
beam shown.
L
SOLUTION
PL P
a
b
P
PL
P P
The shear force and bending moment diagrams are constructed by the same way as in the
previous example.
EXAMPLE 3.13
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the w
beam shown. a b
SOLUTION L
w
a b
wL/2 wL/2
Statically determinate beams and frames 129
L/ 2 L/ 2
wL/2 a c
b
w L2 /8
Ly1 = wL2/4
b
a
T Tc
-wL/2 a Tb
Shear diagram Moment diagram
o
Shear Force Diagram
Since the load between a and b is constant, the shear force diagram is linear. The shear force
changes from wL/2 at a to –wL/2 at b and the slope of shear force diagram is equal to the load
according to Eq. (3.1). The slope of shear force diagram is give as
dQ wL / 2
dx = L / 2 = w
Since the shear force diagram is linear, the bending moment diagram is nonlinear to the second
degree. The maximum bending moment value occurs at midspan where the value of shear
force is zero. This value is equal to wL2/8. At the maximum bending value (at midspan in the
present case), the tangent of the bending moment diagram is horizontal. To construct the
tangent of the bending moment diagram at a (Ta), Eq. (3.3) is applied as follows:
dM
dx = Qa
at a
Then,
Ly1 wL
=
L /2 2
Then,
wL2
Ly1 =
4
EXAMPLE 3.14
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the shown beams.
130 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
b b
W W
L
L
a a
L'
L'
Beam 1 Beam 2
w
b
n b
je ct io
ro
lp
n Ha
w o
L L
a
L'
L'
Beam 3 Beam4
SOLUTION
b
Beam 1
b
c
L’/
2 Tb
wL
-w
L’/8
’/2 Tc
wL a
wL
L’/
Ta
8
o
a SFD BMD
Beam 2
b
b
c
Tb
L/2
wL
-w
/2
2/8
wL a Tc
wL
Ta
2/
a
SFD
8
BMD o
Statically determinate beams and frames 131
Beams 3 and 4 b
b
c
2L
Tb
L’2/
wL
L -w
’2/2
’2/8
wL a
Tc
wL
’2/8
a SFD Ta
o
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.15
W
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the
beam shown. a b
L
SOLUTION
wL2 /2 w
a
b
wL FBD
wL2 /2
wL
Ta
b
a
a b Tb
Lx1 = L/2
SFD BMD
dQ wL
= =w
dx L
which is the same value of load with negative sign (Load intensity = - w).
dM
dx = Qa
at a
132 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Then,
wL2 / 2
= wL
Lx 1
Then,
L
Lx 1 =
2
On the other hand, the tangent of bending moment at b is horizontal (slope = 0) because the
shear value at b is equal zero.
EXAMPLE 3.16
W
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the a b
beam shown.
L
SOLUTION
w
b
a
wL/3 wL/6
FBD
Ta b
c b a
Mmax
a
Lx1= L/3 -wL/6 Tb
Ta
x Tb
Tc L/ 3
SFD
o BMD
dQ
dx = Load at a
at a
wL / 3
=w
Lx 1
L
Lx 1 =
3
The tangent of shear diagram at b is horizontal (slope = 0) since the load at b is equal zero.
value, assume the point of zero shear occurs at distance x from point b using the shown free
body, then
wL 1 wx
− x =0 Mmax
6 2 L wx/L
b
L c
x= x
3
then, FBD wL/6
wL 1 wx L x
Mmax = .x − .x.
6 2 L 3 3
wL L 1 w L L wL2
= − =
6 3 2 3 3 3 3 9 3
To determine the position of tangent Ta (line ao) which tangs the moment diagram at a, Eq.
(3.3) is applied as follow:
dM
dx = Qa
at a
Ly1 wL
=
L /3 3
wL2
Ly1 =
9
The position of tangent Tb (line ob) which tangs the moment diagram at b is determined by the
same way, therefore,
dM
dx = Qb
at b
Ly2 wL
=
2L /3 6
wL2
Ly2 =
9
It is noticed that Ly1 = Ly2 = wL2 / 9 which indicates that the tangents Ta and Tb intersect at
point o as shown in the bending moment diagram.
EXAMPLE 3.17
w
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the beam b
shown. a
L
SOLUTION
134 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
w
wL2/6
a
b
wL/2 FBD
wL/2 wL2/6
Ta b T
a a a b
Lx1 =L/2 Tb Lx1 =L/3 Tb
SFD BMD
dQ
dx = wa
at a
wL / 2
=w
Lx 1
Then,
L
Lx 1 =
2
Notice also that the tangent Tb of the shear diagram at b is horizontal since the load is equal
zero at this point.
dM
dx = Qa
at a
wL2 / 6 wL
=
Lx 1 2
L
Lx 1 =
3
It is noticed that the maximum bending moment is obtained at the fixed end.
Statically determinate beams and frames 135
EXAMPLE 3.18
w
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the a
beam shown. b
L
SOLUTION
wL2 /3 w
a
b
FBD
wL/2
wL2/3
Lx1 = L/2
wL/2 Ta o Ta
Tb a b
Lx2 = 2L/3 Tb
a
b BMD
SFD
The shear force and moment diagrams are constructed by the same way as in the previous
example.
EXAMPLE 3.19
w
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the a c
beam shown. b
L/2 L/2
SOLUTION
w
a c
b
L/2
wL/4 Ta o Lx1 = L/4 a b c
T
wL2/12
Ly1 = wL2 /8
b
c
a Ta Tc
b
Tb
SFD -wL/4 o BMD
dQ
dx = wb
at b
136 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
wL / 4
=w
Lx 1
L
Lx 1 =
4
dM
dx = Qa
at a
L y1 wL
=
L/2 4
wL2
Ly1 =
8
It is noticed that the bending moment diagram is symmetric since the load diagram is
symmetric.
EXAMPLE 3.20
w w
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the
a c
beam shown. b
L/2 L/2
SOLUTION
w w
a c
b
wL/4 a b c
wL/24
Ly1 =L/4
Ta Tb
Ly 1 = wL / 8
a Tc c
b
Ly1 =L/4 Tb
SFD -wL/4
T
c
Ta
BMD
o
Statically determinate beams and frames 137
EXAMPLE 3.21
w
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the a b c
beam shown.
w
L/2 L/2
SOLUTION
w
a b c
w
wL/12 wL/12
FBD
Ly1 =wL2/36
Tc
L/ 2 3 L /2 3 L/ 2 3
WL2 / 36 3
-wL/6
SFD BMD
Tb
Ta
It is noticed that the load and moment diagrams are antisymmetric while the shear diagram is
symmetric.
EXAMPLE 3.22
w
Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the b
a c
beam shown.
w
L/2 L/2
w
b c
a
w
wL/6 wL/6
FBD
The shear force and bending moment diagrams are constructed by the same way as in the
previous example.
EXAMPLE 3.23
20 kN 37.5 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 10 kN/m 40 kN.m 4 20 kN/m
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the a 3
b c e f
d
figure.
2m 2m 2m 4m 2m
SOLUTION
20 kN 30 kN
10 kN/m 40 kN.m d
20 kN/m 42.5 42.5 40
c f a 12.5
a b e
22.5 kN c d e f
22.5 kN b
-20
82.5 kN 107.5 kN -40
FBD SFD -67.5
60
40
22.5 22.5 15
c d 73.9
a b e f
a b c d e f 25 40
70
NFD BMD
Statically determinate beams and frames 139
EXAMPLE 3.24
30 kN 20 kN 50 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 15 kN/m e
1m
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the a c d
figure. b
1.5 m 4.5 m 1.5 m
SOLUTION
-20
20 kN
d
a b c
51.5 kN 96 kN -46
FBD SFD
77.3 75
55
15.4
20
37.97
-20 -20
BMD
NFD
EXAMPLE 3.25
15 kN 10 kN 15 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment 5 kN/m
a f i
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. b c d e g h
6m 2 2 2 2 2 3m 2
SOLUTION
15 kN 10 kN 15 kN 17.5
5 kN/m 10.8 13.6
7.5
3.6
0.0 0.0
22.5
NFD 15 12.1
22.9
BMD
140 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 3.26
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 10 kN/m 40 kN 15 kN/m 40 kN
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in a c d e 20 kN
b f
the figure.
4m 4m 1 5m 2m
SOLUTION
40 kN 15 kN/m 40 kN 50.4
10 kN/m 40 40
c d 20 kN 10.4
a c d e
b 20 kN e f
a b -3.5 f
50.4 kN 26.1 kN 81 kN -29.6 -29.6
-41
FBD SFD
80
a b c d e f
a b c d
e f
-20 3.5
-20
20
NFD
121.8 BMD
EXAMPLE 3.27
15 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment a b c
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 60 kN
3m
e
50 kN.m f d
6m 1 1 6m
SOLUTION
15 kN/m
32.2 38.3
76.7
38.3 34.6
50 50
NFD 38.3 67.5
BMD
65
Statically determinate beams and frames 141
EXAMPLE 3.28
50 kN
12 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending e
d
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the 120 kN
18 kN/m 3m
figure. a
b c
SOLUTION 6m 2m 4m
50 kN 69.3
12 kN/m 45.3
46.2 kN
d
e -4.7
120 kN 105.3
18 kN/m
52.7 kN 69.3 -52.7
46.2 kN 30.9 30.9
c
a b
FBD SFD
30.9 kN 194.4 kN -89.1 -89.1
46.2 46.2
174.7
24
114.7
-83
BMD
.3
46.2
46.2
NFD 92.7
-8
3.3
EXAMPLE 3.29
85 kN
127.5 kN
35 30 30
30 kN
15 kN/m
127.5 kN
35 kN
FBD
SFD -55
142 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
15
3 .2
60
15
3 .2
40.8 BMD
-127.5 -127.5
NFD
EXAMPLE 3.30
a
b
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 3m
40 kN
c d
e
4m 2m
SOLUTION
60 60
360 kN.m
40 kN
60 kN
40 kN
40 kN 40 40
20 kN
FBD
-20 -20
SFD
.2
360
72
-40 -40
.2
BMD
72
40 40
80
NFD
Statically determinate beams and frames 143
EXAMPLE 3.31
b 0.5 m
c
SOLUTION
10 kN
2.5 m
a
1m 4m
24 kN
d .1
N/ m -7
5k 20 kN 1 2.
9
b
c SFD
FBD .9
10 kN - 8.
9 -13
24 kN
a
18 kN
30 . 4
.8
12 5. 7
4
20.
7
4 .5 NFD BMD
-3 0
-30
EXAMPLE 3.32
d
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending
20 kN
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the 40 kN.m 2m
figure. a b c
2m
e
SOLUTION
3m 2m 2m
144 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
10 kN 10 kN
20 20
40 kN.m 20 kN
0
10 kN
SFD
FBD 10 kN
.1
14
40 40
.1
14
-1
4 .1
NFD SFD
-1
4.
1
EXAMPLE 3.33
10 kN 25 kN
12 kN/m 20 kN.m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending f g
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the b c d
figure. 4m
10 kN
a e h
SOLUTION
3m 4m 3m 4m 2m
10 kN 25 kN 28.8
12 kN/m 20 kN.m
f 13 13
b g
5
c d
10 kN
29.1 kN 24.1 kN -10 -10 -12
5
-19.2
-5 -5
a e h
5 kN
38.8 kN 32.1 kN 12 kN
FBD SFD
30
-29.1 20 20
10.7
-12
-5 -5
4.62
-1 2
10
.5
- 40
28.1
- 48
.2
BMD
NFD
Statically determinate beams and frames 145
EXAMPLE 3.34
f g
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 30 kN/m 3m
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in a b c e
d
the figure. 160 kN 120 kN
4m 4m 4m 4m
SOLUTION
Having determined the external reaction components, it is necessary to calculate the axial
forces in all link members. The axial force in link member fg can be determined using the
equation condition given by hinge at c as follows:
Σ Mc (left) = 0: Mc (left) F fg F fg
f g
4
Ffg 3 + 240 8 – 160 4 = 0 a
3
5
30 kN/m
b e
c d
Then, Ffg = – 426.7 kN
240 kN 160 kN 120 kN 280 kN
The axial forces in the other link members are determined by analyzing the forces at joints f
and g as follow:
F af
Σ Fy = 0 (+): – 3/5 Faf – Fbf = 0 F bf
– 3/5 (– 533.3) – Fbf = 0
Joint f
Fbf = 320 kN
The axial forces in link members dg and eg are determined by the same way
-53 400
3 .3 -426.7 3 320
426.7 -5 3 .3 426.7
EXAMPLE 3.35
40 kN.m 60 kN 20 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending c
b d e
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the
5
figure.
4. 4
4 4 4m
a 2 3
f
SOLUTION
2m 5m 3m 3m
40 kN.m 60 kN 20 kN/m
The external reaction components are first c
b d e
determined by applying the equilibrium 7
4 .4
The force in the link member ab using the geometry of this member, thus,
Fab X Y
= a= a
4.47 2 4
X 22
Fab = a 4.47 = 4.47 = 49.2kN (compression)
2 2
On the other hand, the forces in link members df and ef can be determined by applying the
equilibrium in the horizontal and vertical directions at joint f,
The horizontal and the vertical components of the forces Fdf and Fef are determined and then
applied to the structure at points d and e. These components are determined using the geometry
and resultant forces as follow:
Statically determinate beams and frames 147
Member df:
Fdf X df Ydf
= =
5 3 4
103.3 X df Ydf
= =
5 3 4
103.3
X df = 3 = 62 kN
5
103.3
Ydf = 4 = 82.6 kN
5
Member ef:
Fef X ef Yef
= =
5 3 4
66.7 X Y
= ef = ef
5 3 4
66.7
X ef = 3 = 40 kN
5
66.7
Yef = 4 = 53.4 kN
5
66.7
60 kN
40 kN.m 20 kN/m
-16 -16
22 kN 62 kN 40 kN -53.3
44 kN 82.6 kN 53.4 kN
FBD SFD
40 40 40
-22
40
.2
40
-1
7
6.
-4 9
03
71.1
-6
.3
NFD BMD
EXAMPLE 3.36
148 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
50 kN 10 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending a b c d
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the
figure. 3m
30 kN
e f
40 kN
SOLUTION 2m 2m 2m 2m
50 kN 10 kN/m
Xa =30 kN b c
a d
The external reaction components are first
determined by applying the equilibrium conditions
3.
61
Ya =68.8 kN 3 Yd =61.3 kN
on the shown free body. 3
30 kN e f
40 kN
FBD
Fcf X cf Ycf
= =
3.61 2 3
24.1 X cf Ycf
= =
3.61 2 3
24.1
X cf = X df = 2 = 13.4 kN
3.61
24.1
Ycf = Ydf = 3 = 20 kN
3.61
68.8
X ae = 2 = 45.9 kN
3
68.8
Fae = 3.61 = 82.7 kN
3
The forces in members be and ce can be determined using the equilibrium of joint e as follow:
30 kN e
Σ Fy = 0 (+): Fbe + 3/3.61 Fce + 3/3.61 82.7 = 0
Fbe = – 92.5 kN Joint e
42.5 42.5
50 kN 10 kN/m
30 kN
45.9 kN 15.9 kN 13.4 kN 13.4 kN
92.5 kN
6 8.8 kN
61.3 kN
6 8.8 kN
23 .8 kN
20 kN
-1.3
20 kN
-41.3
SFD
FBD
82
.6
.7
28
-13.4
24
.1
.1
24
-15.9 85
-92.5
BMD
NFD
EXAMPLE 3.37
8 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending a b c
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the 3m
figure.
d e f 15 kN
g
30 kN 40 kN
3m 2m 2m 2m
SOLUTION
The reactions and free body diagram are previously determined in Example 1.23.
150 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
.3 515
302.5
89
-15 -15
-50.4 -50.4
34.9
-14.8
-64
NFD
142.5
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.38
50 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending b d
c
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the
figure.
3m
15 kN/m
a
SOLUTION
6m
50 kN
d 32.5 32.5
b c
Xd=22.5 kN
Yd=17.5 kN -22.5
-17.5 -17.5
15 kN/m
FBD
a
Ya =32.5 kN
SFD
Statically determinate beams and frames 151
45
45
-32.5
-22.5 -22.5
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.39
25 kN 6 kN/m
15 kN c
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment b
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure.
5m
SOLUTION
a
7m
44.2
25 kN 6 kN/m 23.2
15 kN -1.8
-15
-22.8
22.8 kN
15 kN
FBD
-15
SFD
44.2 kN
75
-44.2
75
43
-4 4.2
NFD
BMD
152 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 3.40
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment diagrams for the loaded structure
shown in the figure.
30 kN
15 kN/m 60 kN
e
c b d
30 kN 4m
a
2m 4m 4m
SOLUTION
30 kN 60 kN 63.8
15 kN/m
e 3.7 3.7
c b d
30 kN -30 -60
56.3 kN -56.3 -56.3
30
30 kN
SFD
30
a
FBD
123.8 kN
90
30
60
-123.8
60
105 112.5
NFD
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.41
20 kN/m
20 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending b
c
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the 1.5 m
30 kN
figure.
1.5 m
d
SOLUTION a
1m
6m
Statically determinate beams and frames 153
20 kN/m 59.2
20 kN
30 kN
-1 0
-60.8
30
10 kN
60.8 kN
SFD
-10
59.2 kN FBD
40 45
-60 .8
40 45
-30 -30
-59. 2
-60.8
47.5
-5 9.2
NFD
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.42
15 kN
50 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment b c
a
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure.
4m
10 kN/m
SOLUTION d
1m 3m 3m
15 kN 50 kN 27.5 27.5
20
20 kN
42.5 kN
-15
-22.5 -22.5
10 kN/m
SFD
-20
20 kN
FBD 22.5 kN
15
-22.5
-20 -20
67.5
20
-2 2.5
NFD BMD
154 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 3.43
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment 15 kN/m 18 kN/m
20 kN
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. b c d
4m
e
a 1m
2m 4m
SOLUTION
50
15 kN/m
20 kN
34
18 kN/m
-14
-40
2 kN
-2
14 kN
-1 4
40 kN
SFD
50 kN FBD
70
-40
40
-34 -34 70 40
-50
13.3
-40
NFD
-50
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.44
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment b
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. m kN
N/ 30
1 2k
4m
c
a
SOLUTION
6m 1.5 1.5
Statically determinate beams and frames 155
22
.6
/m kN
kN 30
22
12
.5
.6
-48
-7
38
.4
24 kN
-7
SFD
.
4
45.7 kN 44.3 kN
FBD
38
38
.3
-25
- 49
.9
1 8.
5
- 49
.3
-25 .2
NFD
.9
60
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.45
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment 10 kN 15 kN 10 kN/m
e
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. b a d
20 kN.m
4m
c
SOLUTION
2m 1m 1m 2m
10 kN/m 15 15
10 kN 15 kN
12
20 kN.m
-1
5
-20
12
FBD
25 kN.m SFD
-1
5
45 kN
30 20 40
-1 6
-20
40
30
BMD
45
NFD
20
-1 6
-2
0
EXAMPLE 3.46
156 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
a
2m
SOLUTION c
2m 2m 3m 3m
10
b
.6
40 kN 30 kN
10
.1
.6
14
22.5 kN
4 .1
-1
a
2.5 kN 17.5 kN
-1
0 .6
c
FBD 32.5 kN SFD
-1
0 .6
.6
.7
-1
0
17
4
-1
.1
40
-3
45
5
.4
BMD
-3
NFD
5.
4
EXAMPLE 3.47
15 kN 40 kN 30 kN.m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending c d
b
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the
figure.
40 kN
8m
a e
SOLUTION
3m 3m 3m 3m
Statically determinate beams and frames 157
15 kN 40 kN 30 kN.m
-15
1.5
-3
40 kN
-1
.5
20
14.1 kN 25.9 kN
SFD
-3
15.4 kN 39.6 kN
FBD
45 30
30
45
7.9
-2
-4 7
.2
. 9
-3
2.5
10
-47
NFD
BMD
.2
EXAMPLE 3.48
20 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment 40 kN f
d e
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 2m
20 kN
b c 1m
h g
3m
SOLUTION a i
1m 3m 4m 1m 2m
20 kN/m 40
33.8
.4
40 kN
d e f 22
.4
10.2
20 kN 22
b c -66.3
g
-1 0.2
h
-40
10.2 kN 10.2 kN -20
a
-1 0.2
i
10.2
73.8 kN 126.2 kN
SFD
FBD
158 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
81.3
-10.2 -10.2 40
-106.2
.2 .8
-2 7 80
3 0.610.6 41.2
40 28.5
4 0.8
20
-73.8
-12 6 .2
NFD
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.49
20 kN/m
d
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment b
c
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 2m
a 40 kN
10 kN/m
2m
e
2m 4m
SOLUTION
20 kN/m
d 33.3
.6
40
b c 23
40 kN 40 kN -40 -46.7
.6
23
a
1 0 kN/m
-2 0
20
73.3 kN
e SFD
FBD
-40
40 kN
46.7 kN
40
-4 6.7
-40 -40
1
0.
26.7
-8
.7
66 54.5
.1
60
0
-8
NFD
-4 6.7
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.50
Statically determinate beams and frames 159
l
Ha
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending m on
20 kN kN/ d 30 kN 1.5 m
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in 12
4m
a f
SOLUTION
2m 6m 4m
l 26
n Ha .3
/m o .1
12 k
N 30 kN 49 . 3
20 kN -15 8.
3
10 kN
-40
-20
-4 0
40 kN
SFD
94.9 kN FBD 2.9 kN
.6 8
86 6 .6 .7
-36
200 20
.8
4 -3
74. 0 .3
-6 .
3
160
40
.9
-6 8
-94.9
2.9
BMD NFD
EXAMPLE 3.51
12 kN/m 30 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending d
b c
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the 20 kN 2m
figure. e f
3m
a g
SOLUTION
3m 6m 2m
160 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
30 kN 30 30
12 kN/m 17.3
8. 9
20 kN 20 20
-54.7
8 .9
40 kN.m SFD
17.3 kN
FBD 104.7 kN
60
52
-84 .7
.8
52 40
-14
40
-104.7
64.5
.8
40
NFD
-14
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.52
30 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment 20 kN
d g
e f
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 2m
20 kN/m
c b
2m
a h
2m
i
SOLUTION
1m 2m 6m 2m
30 kN/m
135
47.5
d 60
20 kN g
e f
20 kN/m
c b -105
-47.5
47.5 kN -20
a h
155 kN 72.5 kN
i
-72.5
SFD
FBD 165 kN 105 kN.m
Statically determinate beams and frames 161
210
90 60
210
-165
30
-155 -135
-47.5 -47.5
93.8
115
20
95
-165
NFD BMD
105
EXAMPLE 3.53
60 kN
30 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment e
f
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. b c d
80 kN
6m
SOLUTION
a g
1.5 m 5m 3m 2m
30 kN/m 60 kN
110
f 60 60
b c d e
-40
80 kN -40
-45 -40
40 40
-40
40 kN 40 kN
a
g
98.8 kN.m 100 kN -40
-40
-40
-155
26.7
12 0
-155
-100
98.8
NFD BMD
EXAMPLE 3.54
162 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
15 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment b c
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 2.5 m
d
40 kN
2m
3m 60 kN
2m
SOLUTION a e
5m 3m
15 kN/m
c 51
b
d -24
-28.8
40 kN
60 kN
28.8
11.2 kN
a 11.2
-31.2
e
51 kN 4.7 kN.m
SFD
FBD 24 kN
67.4
-28.8 -3 67.4
7.
5
-51
19.2
-3
-24
7. 5
33. 5
5 7.7
-51
-24
NFD
BMD
4.7
EXAMPLE 3.55
30 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 40 kN 8k
N/ m 35 kN
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the 20 kN d
3m
figure. b
f
c e
3m
80 kN
SOLUTION 3m
a g
2m 3m 3m 6m 2m
Statically determinate beams and frames 163
30 kN 1 3.
40 kN 6
8 kN 0 .4
20 kN /m 35 kN
4 4.6 35
- 34
-40
.4
40
80 kN -20
40 kN
-40
40 kN
- 40
129 kN.m
SFD
85.2 kN FBD 93.5 kN
-3 7
.9
1 51 15 . 5
1 2. 70
-4 7 9
111
-93.5
.9
-6 4 -6 1
.9 40
120
-85 .2
-93.5
129
NFD BMD
EXAMPLE 3.56
25 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 10 kN
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the c
5 kN/m 15 kN 2m
figure.
b d e
a
15 kN
3m
f 6 kN/m
SOLUTION
3m 2m 3m 1.5 m
25 kN
10 kN
55.5 kN.m 26
5 kN/m 15 kN
11 15 15
11 kN
21
15 kN
26 kN
6 kN/m
12
-3
12 kN
36 kN.m
FBD SFD
-12
29 kN
164 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
55.5
22.5
22.5
.6
-29
-25
5
-1
-11 -11 .2
36 47.2
-2 9
NFD BMD
EXAMPLE 3.57
40 kN
20 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending b e
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the c d 2.5 m
figure. 30 kN 2.5 m
a
SOLUTION
3m 3m 2m 8m
40 kN 99.4
20 kN/m
20 20
e
b c d
-20 -20
-60 -60.6
-30 -30
20 kN 30 kN
30 kN
a SFD
FBD 159.4 kN
155
80
75 75
-159.4
60 91.9
NFD BMD
EXAMPLE 3.58
60 kN 20 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 20 kN/m
15 kN
b f
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the c e g
figure. 4m
a d
SOLUTION
6m 2m 4m 2m
Statically determinate beams and frames 165
60 kN 20 kN 60 60
20 kN/m 26.7 20
c g
b f 15 kN
e
-15
120 kN -33.3
15 kN -60
-15
a d SFD
26.7 kN 93.3 kN FBD
80 80
20
60
-15 -15 -15
-93.3
10
-26.7
NFD 80
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.59
20 kN/m
b
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 40 kN c d e g
h
SOLUTION 2m 6m 2m 6m 2m
20 kN/m
100
b 50
h 30
40 kN c d e g
-26.7 -26.7
-100 -110
36.7
26.7 36.7 kN 30 kN
a f i
30
SFD
100 kN FBD 150 kN 110 kN
160
180
-30 -30
-66.7 -66.7 60
90
-15 0
122.5
-10 0
- 110
NFD
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.60
166 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
8 kN/m
10 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 15 kN d e f 10 kN
12 kN/m
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the 3m
c b g j
figure. i
4m
a h k
SOLUTION 2m 3m 6m 2m 4m
39.6
8 kN/m 10 kN
15 kN 10 kN 12 kN/m
34
-7.5
24
-32.4
7.5 kN 2.5 kN -15
-24
- 2.5
-7.5
54.6 kN 66.4 kN 24 kN
SFD
FBD
82.7 50.7
-32.4
-7.5
-39.6
58.1 50.7
60.1 82.7
68
30 15.1
-66.4
-54 .6
-24
9.9
30.1
24
NFD
BMD
EXAMPLE 3.61
15 kN/m
30 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending b c d
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the 30 kN 2m
figure.
2m
a e
SOLUTION
6m 4m
15 kN/m
d
The external reactions, shown in the figure, are b
c 30 kN
determined using the equilibrium equations and the 30 kN
condition equation given by intermediate hinge at b
15 kN
a e 15 kN
35 kN 115 kN
FBD
Statically determinate beams and frames 167
The internal forces in members ce and de can be determined by applying the equilibrium
equations at joint e as follow:
e 15 kN
The components of Fde can be calculated 115 kN
using the member geometry. These values
are given as Joint e
Xde = Yde = 15 kN
15 kN/m 35 45
d
b
c 15 kN 30 kN
-1 5 -15
30 kN -15
100 kN 15 kN
-55
15
15 kN
a
FBD
15
35 kN SFD
60
-100
-15 -15
-35
.2
7.5
1
-2
40.8
30
-35
-100
NFD .2
-2
1 BMD
EXAMPLE 3.62
20 kN 50 kN
c
f
e
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment d
2m
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 40 kN
b
2m
a
SOLUTION
2m 3m 3m
168 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
20 kN 50 kN
The external reaction components, shown in the figure, are c f
calculated using the known equilibrium equations d e
40 kN 31.7 kN
b
40 kN
a
38.3 kN FBD
The internal force in link member be is calculated using the condition equation given by the
intermediate hinge at c
Σ Mc(bottom) = 0:
20 kN 50 kN
Xbe 2 + 40 2 – 40 4 = 0 c f
Xbe = 40 kN d Ybe e
Fbe
F be 31.7 kN
40 kN
The other components are calculated using the b Xbe
member geometry
40 kN S Mc (bottom) = 0
a
Fbe X Y
= be = be 38.3 kN FBD
3.61 3 2
X be
Fbe = 3.61 = 48.1 kN
3
X
Ybe = be 2 = 26.7 kN
3
20 kN 50 kN 45 45
c f
d 26.7 e
-4 0
b 40
40 kN
SFD
40
a
38.3 kN FBD
.1
48
40
.1 -40
48
-65
95
80
-38.3
NFD BMD
EXAMPLE 3.63
Statically determinate beams and frames 169
e g 0.5 m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 1.5 m
f
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the 100 kN d
80 kN
figure. 3m
c
a b 1m
SOLUTION
1.6 m 3.4 m 4m 2m
e
g
The reaction components at a and b are calculated using d
100 kN f 80 kN
the known equilibrium equations and the condition
equation given by the intermediate hinge at e.
c
80 kN
b
a
80 kN FBD
28 kN 208 kN
The force in link member df can be calculated using the condition equation given by the
intermediate hinge at c
S Mc (right) = 0
Fdf 3 – 80 6 = 0 80 kN
c
Fdf = 160 kN a b
80 kN
28 kN 208 kN
FBD
e g
64
160 160
d
-80
100 kN f 80 kN
c
-32
80 5
80 kN
.5
.
-20
b
43
a
80 kN
-80
28 kN 208 kN
FBD SFD
9 .6
-128
14
160
0
16
160
7 .9
-4
.6
-128
49
.7 1
7 6
-1
72
8
80
-208
8.
10
NFD BMD
EXAMPLE 3.64
170 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
30 kN
10 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment N/ m
15 kN 8k e f
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 2m
d c
40 kN 2m
b g
3m
SOLUTION a h
2m 4m 3m
30 kN
The external reaction components at a and h are N/ m 10 kN
8k e f
determined using the equilibrium equations. These 15 kN
10 kN
a h
84.8 kN 35.9 kN
FBD
30 kN
10 kN
40 kN /m
8 kN e f
15 kN
Xb g Xg
b S Me (right) = 0
d c
Yb Yb Yg
Yg
4m 3m b g
Xb Xg
10 kN
a h
84.8 kN 35.9 kN
The vertical reaction Yb and Yg can be determined considering the equilibrium of member bg,
in which
Σ Mg = 0 : Yb 7 – 40 3 = 0
Yb = 17.14 kN
Σ Mb = 0 : Yg 7 – 40 4 = 0
Yg = 22.86 kN
Σ Fx = 0: Xb = Xg …………………………………….(a)
Statically determinate beams and frames 171
The horizontal components Xb and Xg are determined considering the condition equation
given by the intermediate hinge at e
Σ Me (right)= 0 : Xg 4 + Yg 3 – 35.9 3 = 0
Xg 4 + 22.86 3 – 35.9 3 = 0
Xg = 9.8 kN
30 kN 10 kN
N/m
15 kN 8k e f
6. 3
d c 3 8.3
-13.1
17.1 kN 22.9 kN
g
-19.8
b
9.8
9.8 kN 9.8 kN
-15 17.1
10 kN
a h
35.9 kN -1 0 -22.9
84.8 kN
40 kN
9.8 kN 9.8 kN
SFD
b g
17.1 kN 22.9 kN
FBD
39.2 39.2
6
-19.9 99.
-13 .1
.3
-2 5
-67.7
.3 30
-41
69.6
9.8 9.8
30
- 35.9
-84.8
68.6
NFD BMD
EXAMPLE 3.65
172 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
15 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment c
d
e
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 2m
f
2m
b
SOLUTION 20 kN
40 kN 2m
a g
3m 3m
15 kN/m
c e
The external reaction components at a and g are determined d
using the known equilibrium equations. On the other hand,
the forces at intermediate hinges b and f can be determined f
using the condition equation given by the hinge at d.
20 kN
b
Xa =20 kN 40 kN
g
a
Ya =24.6 kN Yg =60.4 kN
FBD
Determination of forces components at b and f:
15 kN/m
c e
d
Xf
Md (left) = 0 f
Σ Md (left)= 0:
Xb 4 – Yb 3 = 0 ……………………………………….………..(b)
Xb = 11.2 kN ; Yb = 15 kN
Σ Fx = 0:
Xf = Xb = 11.2 kN
Σ Fy = 0:
Yf + Yb – 15 3 = 0
Statically determinate beams and frames 173
Yf + 15 – 15 3 = 0
Yb = 30 kN
15 kN/m 15 15
-11.2
11.2 kN -30
11.2
30 kN
-11.2
11.2 kN
8.8
11.2 kN
15 kN
11.2
9.6 9.6
8.8
20 kN
11.2 kN
40 kN
20 kN SFD -30.4 -30.4
24.6 kN 60.4 kN
FBD
45
22.5
2 2.5
45
-30
-11.3 -11.3
-15
-15
45
11.2 11.2
-30
17.5
45
NFD 17.5
46.3 BMD
EXAMPLE 3.66 25 kN 10 kN
c f
d e
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment 2m
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 20 kN
b g
16 kN/m 2m
SOLUTION a h
3m 3m 1m
Ya = 64.9 kN
FBD
174 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
25 kN 10 kN
20 kN
c
d e f
Considering the portion bcdeg as shown in the
66.1 kN
figure,
b M d (left) = 0 g
Xb Xg
Σ Mg = 0: Yb Yg
FBD
Yb 6 – 25 3 + 20 2 – 66.1 1 = 0
Yb = 16.9 kN
Σ Md (left)= 0:
Yb 3 - Xb 2 = 0 ; Xb = 25.3 kN
Σ Fx = 0:
Xb - Xg + 20 = 0 ; Xg = 45.3 kN
Σ Fy = 0:
Yb + Yg – 25 – 10 + 66.1 = 0 ; Yg = – 48 kN
25 kN 10 kN
20 kN
16.9 16.9
-8.1
-25.3
66.1 kN
25.3 kN
45.3
45.3 kN -66.1
16.9 kN
-25.3
48 kN
25.3
25.3 kN
48
45.3 kN 20 kN
16 kN/m
SFD -48
64.9 kN
FBD
50.6
20 24.4
50 .6
90.6
-25.3 66.1
-16.9
48
50.6 50.6
25.3
50 .6
50 .6
21.4
NFD BMD
Statically determinate beams and frames 175
EXAMPLE 3.67
90 kN 20
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending kN
e /m 20 kN 3 m
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in 20 kN
10 kN
the figure. d c f g
3m
b h
2m
SOLUTION a i
2m 1.5 1.5 4m 3m
17 kN 7 kN
123.6 kN 106.4 kN
FBD
Fbd = 51 kN 10 kN
Fb c 3/3.61 F bd
b h
Xbd = 2/3.61 51 = 28.3 kN 2/3.61 F bd
Mc (bottom)=0
Ybd = 3/3.61 51 = 42.4 kN a i
7 kN
17 kN
106.4 kN
123.6
FBD
The forces Ffg and Fgh are determined using the vertical and the horizontal equilibrium at
joint g as follow:
176 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
21
20
90 kN kN
.2
20 kN /m
61
. 4
10 kN -2
28.3 kN
42.4 kN 42.4 kN 20 kN -5
11.3
9
28.3 kN 20 kN -62.4
27
17 kN 7 kN
7
-17
7
123.6 kN 106.4 kN SFD
FBD
-5 .
4
124.8
6 94
8
1. 13 .8
4.
-2 .8
12
94.8
.2
1
10
5.
-28.4 85
- -6
-86.4
5. 4
-166
3
8.
51
-2
33.9
13.9
-10 6.4
-123.6
NFD BMD
EXAMPLE 3.68
30 kN
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending 15 kN
c d e
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the
figure. 4m
b a f g
SOLUTION 20 kN
2m 6m 2m
30 kN
15 kN c
The external reaction components at a and g are d e
determined by applying the equilibrium conditions
on the whole frame. These reaction components
are given in the shown figure b a f g Xg =15 kN
20 kN Yg =22.5 kN
Ya =27.5 kN
FBD
Statically determinate beams and frames 177
Σ Mb = 0:
Yf 8 – 15 4 – 30 2 = 0
Yf = 15 kN
Σ Md (left) = 0:
Xb 4 – Yb 2 = 0 ; Xb = 7.5 kN
Σ Fx (→+) = 0:
Xb + 15 – Xf = 0 ; Xf = 22.5 kN
30 kN
15 kN
15
-15
22.5
7.5 kN
-7.5
22.5 kN 12.5
15 kN 15 kN
15 kN 15 kN
22.5 kN
15 kN
-15
7.5 kN
27.5 kN 20 kN
SFD -22.5
22.5 kN
FBD
90
30
-15
30
90
-22.5 -22.5
-15
7.5 7.5
-15
30
NFD -15
BMD 45
178 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 3.69
20 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending moment h
j
20 kN i
diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the figure. 2m
f g
40 kN 2m
20 kN
e
SOLUTION c d
3m
a b
3m 3m
20 kN/m
20 kN
j
The vertical reaction components at a and b are determined h i
by applying the equilibrium equations for the whole frame.
f g
These reaction components are given in the shown figure.
40 kN
On the other hand, the horizontal reaction components at a 20 kN
e
and b could not be directly determined as in the case of the c d
vertical components.
The horizontal reaction component at a and b can be Xa Xb
determined after the calculating the forces in the a b
intermediate hinges at f and g. 46.7 kN 113.3 kN
FBD
Σ Mg = 0: 20 kN/m
20 kN
j
i
Yf 6 + 20 2 + (20 6) 3 = 0 h
Yf = 53.3 kN Xf Xg
Mi (left) = 0 g
f
Σ Mf = 0: Yf Yg
Yg 6 – 20 2 – (20 6) 3 = 0 FBD
Yg = 66.7 kN
Σ Mi (left) = 0:
Xf 2 – Yf 3 + 20) 3) 1.5 = 0 ; Xf = 35 kN
Σ Fx = 0:
Xf + 20 – Yg = 0 ; Xg = 55 kN
Statically determinate beams and frames 179
f 40 kN 55 kN g
Xa 3 – 46.7 3 + 35 2 + 53.5 3 = 0 35 kN
Xa = – 30 kN 20 kN
d e
c
Σ Fx (→+)= 0:
Md (left) = 0
Xa Xb
Xa – Xb + 20 – 35 + 55 = 0 a b
Xb = 10 kN 46.7 kN 113.3 kN
FBD
20 kN/m
20 kN
j
h i
53.3
35 kN g 55 kN
f
55
-3 5
53.5 kN 66.7 kN -66.7
f g
35 kN 55 kN
40 kN
-35
55
30
20 kN
10
e -6.7 -6.7
c d -46.7 -46.7
SFD
30
10
30 kN 10 kN
a b
46.7 kN 113.3 kN
FBD
110
70
11 0
70
-55
-53.3
-6 6.7
140
45
90 7 0
30
20
1 10
-113.3
-46.7
NFD BMD
180 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
EXAMPLE 3.70
20 kN/m
Draw the normal force, shearing force, and bending e
f
25 kN
moment diagrams for the loaded structure shown in the
figure. 4m
a d
SOLUTION b c
3m 6m 2m
20 kN/m
25 kN
The external reaction components at a and d are e f
determined by applying the equilibrium conditions on
the whole frame. These reaction components are
given in the shown figure a =25 kN a d
b c
Ya =45.5 kN Yd=74.5 kN
Σ Me (bottom) = 0: 20 kN/m
Xf
25 kN
e f
Xb = 0
Yf
Me (bottom) = 0
Σ Fx = 0 (→+): Xb b
Yb FBD
Xb + 25 – Xf = 0 ; Xf = 25 kN
Σ Mf = 0:
Yb 6 – (20 6) 3 – Xb 4 = 0 ; Yb = 60 kN
Σ Fy = 0 (+):
Yb – (20 6) + Yf = 0 ; Yf = 60 kN
20 kN/m
25 kN
e f 25 kN
60
60 kN 60 kN
b 25 kN f
-60
60 kN
25
60 kN 45.5
25 kN a d
b c -14.5 -14.5
45.5 kN 74.5 kN SFD -74.5
FBD
Statically determinate beams and frames 181
-24.9 90
-60 . 1
-59.7
100
25 25
49.1
NFD 136.4 149.1
BMD
182 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Problems
Draw normal force, shearing force and bending moment diagrams for the following structures:
20 kN 6 kN/m
10 kN/m
a
a c b
b c
7m 3m 5m 2m
(1) (2)
20 kN 30 kN 40 kN
15 kN/m
15 kN/m
b a
a c e f b c d e
d
30 kN.m
1.5 m 1.5 m 1.5 m 2.0 m
2m 2m 2m 4m 2m
(3) (4)
d
/m
8 kN 2m
20 kN 30 kN
8 kN/m
b d e g
a b
c f c
a
6m 3m 5m 2m 3m 2m 10 kN
1m 4m 2.5 m
(5) (6)
20 kN
10 kN/m 40 kN.m 10 kN/m
e f
a b d
c 40 kN
40 kN 3m
3m 20 kN
a b
c
d
e f
3m 3m 2m 4m
6m 2m 3m 2m
(7) (8)
Statically determinate beams and frames 183
20 kN
10 kN/m 30 kN.m
c f 120 kN
a g f g
b d
4m
3m
20 kN a b c d
e h e
160 kN
4m 4m 4m 4m
3m 4m 3m 4m 2m
(9) (10)
40 kN 50 kN 40 kN
40 kN.m 40 kN/m 20 kN/m
b e
b d e c d
2.5 m
5
c 4 4m 60 kN
3 2.5 m
f a
a
2m 5m 3m 3m
3m 3m 2m 4m 4m
(11) (12)
10 kN/m 12 kN/m
20 kN 30 kN
12 kN/m
e b c d
c b d
25 kN 4m 4m
a
a e
2m 4m 2m 2m 2m 4m
(13) (14)
5 kN/m
b 20 kN/m
c d
b
c
15 kN 2m
a 40 kN
5m
10 kN/m
2m
e
a
2m 4m
2m 2m 2.5 m
(15) (16)
184 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
18 kN/m
g al
nH
30 kN e f N/mo d
2m 20 kN 20 k 30 kN 1.5 m
c d 40 kN 10 kN 1.5 m
1m e
b h c b
3m 4m
a i a f
1m 3m 5m 2m 2m 6m 4m
(17) (18)
20 kN 60 kN
20 kN/m 30 kN/m
e
d g f
30 kN b c d
e f
2m
10 kN/m
c b 80 kN
2m 6m
a
h
2m a g
i
1.5 m 5m 3m 2m
1m 8m 2m
(19) (20)
15 kN 60 kN 30 kN/m
60 kN 30 kN/m f
f b
b c e
c e g
4m
4m 20 kN
20 kN a
a d d g
3m 3m 2m 4m 2m
6m 2m 4m 2m
(21) (22)
20 kN 50 kN
20 kN/m c
6 15 kN f
d e
50 kN 5
2m 2m
3 4 40 kN
b
4m 2m
1 2 a g
2m 7m 2m 3m 3m
2m
(23) (24)
Statically determinate beams and frames 185
f 25 kN
e e 10 kN
g c
d
2m
d 80 kN 2m
100 kN
20 kN
3m b f
c 2m
a 16 kN/m
b 1m g
a
h
2.5 m 2.5 m 4m 2m 3m 3m
(25) (26)
90 kN 20
e kN 30 kN
20 kN /m 20 kN h g
3m f
15 kN
d c f g
4m
3m
h 30 kN
b b d e
i 2m a c
a 20 kN
2m 3m 3m 2m
2 m 1.5 1.5 4m 3m
(27) (28)
20 kN/m
h
j
10 kN i
20 kN/m 2m
e f g
f
25 kN 40 kN 2m
20 kN
4m e
c d
1.5 m
a d
b c
1.5 m
a b
3m 3m 3m 2m
3m 3m
(29) (30)
186 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
4
Influence Lines for Statically
Determinate Structures
4.1 Introduction
The influence lines show graphically how the movement of a unit load across a structure
influences some functions of the structure. These functions may include reactions, normal
forces, shear forces, and bending moment. Influence lines are used primarily for calculating
forces and positions for live loads at maximum effects. The procedure for drawing the
diagrams is simply the plotting of values of the function under study as ordinates for various
positions of the unit load along the span.
EXAMPLE 4.1
Construct the influence lines for the reactions, shear a b c
at b, and moment at b for the simple beam shown.
2m 4m
SOLUTION
x 1 kN
a b c
Consider a moving unit load at distance x from
support a. Taking the moment at c, Ra Rc
(1)(6 − x )
Ra =
6
This equation, which is a linear function of x, is the influence line equation for the reaction at
a. Thus, when x = 0, the unit load is at a and Ra = 1; when x = 6, the unit load is at c and Ra=
0. Similarly, the influence line equation for Rc. The graphical representation of the influence
lines of Ra and Rc are given as follow:
188 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
1.0
Influence Line Ra
a b c
1.0
Influence Line Rc
a b c
To check the vertical equilibrium of vertical forces, the sum of the ordinates of the influence-
line diagrams for Ra and Rc at any point equals the unit load.
Qb = R a 1 kN
When the unit load acts to the right of b, it is
most convenient to consider the free-body a c
diagram to the left of point b. For this case, Qb Qb Qb
Rc
Ra
= Ra as shown in figure
Influence Line Qb a c
Qb Qb
Ra Rc
To determine the moment at point b, the beam is cut at point b, Mb is shown in the positive
sense, and statics is applied to determine the value of Mb.
Mb = 2 R a 1 kN
When the unit load is right of point b, the free-
body diagram to the left of point b is considered. a c
Then, Mb = 2Ra. Mb Mb Rc
Ra
a b c
Influence Line Mb
4 Rc 1.33 2 Ra
EXAMPLE 4.2
Construct the influence lines for the reactions, shear a b c
at a and b, and moment at b for the cantilever shown.
2m 1m
SOLUTION
Ra
The influence lines for reactions can be determined using the equilibrium conditions,
1.0 1.0
Influence Line Ya
a c
-3.0
Influence Line Ma
a c
1 kN Mb = 0
Ma a
c
Mb Mb
Ra
Influence Line Mb
a b c
Qa = Ra
1.0 1.0
Influence Line Qa
a c
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 191
EXAMPLE 4.3
Construct the influence lines for the reactions, a b c d e
Qc, Mc, Qd(right), Md, and Qb(right) for the
beam shown. 2m 5m 3m 3m
SOLUTION
Rb Rd
1.25 1.0
0.375
Influence Line Rb d e
a b c
-0.375
1.375
1.0
0.625
a b
Influence Line Rd c d e
-0.25
0.25 0.375
e
Influence Line Qc a b c d
-0.375
-0.625
-1.875
-0.75
Influence Line Mc b c d
a e
1.875
1.0 1.0
-3.0
Influence Line Md a b c d e
Rb Rd
1.0
0.25
e
Influence Line Qb(right) a b c d
-0.375
EXAMPLE 4.4
Construct the influence lines for the reactions, Qd, a b c d e f g
Qb, Mb, Qc(left), Qc(right), Mc, Qe, and Me for the
beam shown. 3m 2m 2m2m
6m 4m
SOLUTION
1.5
1.0
Influence Line Rf
a b c d e f g
194 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
1.0
g
Influence Line Qd c e
a b d f
-0.5
R a= -Q d (3/10) ; Rc = Q d (1 3/10)
1 kN
a c f g
Qd Qd
Ra Rc Rf
1.0
d e 0.15
Influence Line Ra
a b c f g
-0.3
1.3
1.0
Influence Line Rc f g
a b c d e
-0.65
Ra Rc Rf
Ra Rc Rf
-3.0
a b c f g
Influence Line Mc
d e
1.5
Ra Rc Me Me R f
0.5
a b c d f g
Influence Line Qe e
-0.5 -0.5
-1.0
a b c d e f
Influence Line Me g
1.0
Influence Lines for Qb and Mb
Ra Qb Qb Rc R f= 0
196 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Ra Q b Qb Rc Rf
0.4
a c d e 0.15
Influence Line Qb b f
g
-0.3
-0.6
-1.8
a b c f g
Influence Line Mb d e
0.9
2.4
Ra Rc Rf
1.0 1.0
a b f g
Influence Line Qc(right) c e
d
-0.5
Ra Rc Rf
a b c d e 0.15
Influence Line Qc(left)
f g
-0.3
-1.0
EXAMPLE 4.5
Construct the influence lines for Ma, Mc, Mf, Qe(left), a b c d e f g
Qe(right), and Qf.
3m 2m 2m 2m 4m 4m
SOLUTION
1 kN Q = Q = 0 1 kN
Ma b d
e g
Qb Qd
Ra Re Rg
1.0
Influence Line Qb
a b c d e f g
c d
Influence Line Qd a b e f g
-1.0
1.0 1.0
Influence Line Ra
a b c d e f g
-3.0
Influence Line Ma d e f g
a b c
For the unit load between d and g: (Qd=0) Re = 1 (8-x)/8 ; R g = (1) x/8
Ma x 1 kN
a g
Q d =0 Q d Rg
Ra Re
d
1.25
1.0
Influence Line Re
a b c d e f g
1.0
a b c d e
Influence Line Rg
f g
-0.25
0.5
0.25
a b e f
Influence Line Qf
c d g
-0.5
200 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
-1.0
a b e f g
Influence Line Mf c d
2.0
a b c d e f g
Influence Line Mc
1.0
Influence Line for Qe(right)
Re Rg
Ra
R a=0 Re Rg
1.0
0.25
Influence Line Qe(right)
a b c d e f g
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 201
Ma 1 kN Q e(L) Q e(L)
Ra Re Rg
Ra =0 Re Rg
a b c d e f g
Influence Line Qe(left)
-1.0 -1.0
EXAMPLE 4.6
Construct the influence lines for Mb, Me, Mc, Qb, a b c d e f g
Qc(right),Qe(right), Qd and Qf.
3m 3m 2m 2m 2m 3m
SOLUTION
Qf g
Qd
a c f
d Rg
Re Qf
Ra Rc Qd
Rc Re Qf Qf Rg
Ra
Qf = 0 and Rg = 0.
202 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Qf Q f R
Ra Rc Re g
Influence Line Qf a b c d e f
g
1.0
a b c d e f
Influence Line Rg
g
Qd = 0 and Re = 0.
Rc Qd Qd R e Q f Q f=0 R
Ra g
Rc Qd Qd R e Qf Qf Rg
Ra
1.0
a b c f
Influence Line Qd d e g
-1.0
2.0
1.0
Influence Line Re a b c d
e f g
Ra Rc Q d Q d=0 R Rg
e
Ra Rc Qd Qd Re Rg
1.0
0.33
Influence Line Ra c d e
a b f g
-0.33
1.0 1.33
Influence Line Rc e f g
a b c d
-1.33
1 kN Q b= -R c ; Mb = 3R c
x
Mb
Ra Qb Rc R e=0 Rg =0
1 kN
Q b= R a ; Mb = 3R a
Mb Mb
Ra Qb Qb Rc Re Rg
0.5 0.33
a b c d e g
Influence Line Qb
f
-0.5 -0.33
-1.0
a b c e f g
Influence Line Mb d
-1.0
1.5
1 kN Q c(R) = 0;Mc = 0
a Mc Mc g
Ra R c Q c(R) R e =0 R g =0
c
Qc(R)= R a +R c;Mc = 6R a 1 kN
a Mc Mc c g
Ra Rc Qc(R) Re Rg
c
1.0 1.0
a b e f g
Influence Line Qc (right)
c d
-1.0
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 205
-2.0
a b c e f g
Influence Line Mc
d
2.0
Ra Rc Re R g=0
e
Ra Rc Re Rg
1.0 1.0
a b c d
Influence Line Qe(right) e f g
EXAMPLE 4.7
Construct the influence lines for the shear and a b Stringer c d e
moment at f for the main girder. The unit load is
applied to the stringers from a to e. f Girder
2.5 m
SOLUTION 4 at 5m = 20 m
Ra Rd
206 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
1.0
Influence Line Ra e
a b c d
-0.33
1.33
1.0
Influence Line Re
a b c d e
Influence Line Qf a b e
c d
-0.33 -0.33
2.67
a b c d
Influence Line Mf e
2.67 2.67
EXAMPLE 4.8
Determine the influence lines for the vertical force a b c
transferred at b, the reactions at d and f, and normal, f
d e
shear and moment at point e.
The unit load moves from a to c. 3
4
4m 4m 4m 4m 4m
SOLUTION
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 207
Ra Rb Rc
Point b is a simple support for spans ab and bc. The influence line for Rb is easly determined
and given as follows:
1.0
Influence Line Rb
a b c
As the unit load moves from a to c, the load is transmitted to span df by influence line for Rb
3/5 R d d Rb
f Xf
Free body df b
Rd 4/5 R d Yf
Md = 0: Yf = 2/3 Rb
Mf = 0: Rd = 5/12 Rb
Fx = 0: Xf = 3/5 Rd = 3/12 Rb
0.417
Influence Line Rd
a b c
0.67
Influence Line Yf
a b c
0.25
Influence Line Xf
a b c
Rb
3/5 R d d Me Q e M f
e
4/5 R d Yf
208 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Ne = 3/5 Rd = 3/12 Rb
Qe = 4/5 Rd = 4/12 Rb
Me = 4/5 Rd 4 = 4/3 Rb
0.25
Influence Line Ne
a b c
0.33
Influence Line Qe
a b c
a b c
Influence Line Me
1.33
EXAMPLE 4.9
Determine the influence lines for the vertical force b
a
transferred at b, the reactions at a, c and e, and the c d e
shear and moment at d.
The unit load moves from a to b and then to e. 5m 4m 3m 3m
SOLUTION
The span ab is a simply supported beam. As the load moves over span ab, the reaction at b is
determine as previously shown in Example 4.1. On the other hand, when the load moves from
b to e, the reaction at b is equal zero.
1.0
Influence Line Ra
a b d e
1.0
Influence Line Rb
a b d e
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 209
Ra R b R =0.6R , R =0.4R
c b e b
Rb
c
Rc Re
Ra R b =0 R =(10-x)/x, R =x/10
c e
Rb=0 1 kN
c
x
Rc Re
1.0
0.4 0.7
Influence Line Re
a b d e
0.6
0.3
Influence Line Rc
a b d e
Rc Re
0.3
a b
Influence Line Qd
d e
-0.4 -0.7
a b d e
Influence Line Md
1.2
2.1
EXAMPLE 4.10
Determine the influence lines for the shear
and moment at f for the stringer dj, the shear b Stringer c d e f g h i Stringer
a j
and moment at d for the main girder aj, and 3m k 2.5 m Girder
the shear and moment for the main girder at 2m 2m
2m 5m 5m 2m 2m 3m
k. The unit load is applied to the stringers.
SOLUTION
The influence lines for these forces can be determined by considering the equilibrium for each
of beam ad and dj, individually.
1.4
1.0
Influence Line Rb c d j
a b
0.4
1.4
1.0
a b j
Influence Line Rc c d
0.4
1.4
1.0
a h j
Influence Line Re
d e g
-0.4
1.0 1.4
Influence Line Rg a d
e g h j
-0.4
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 211
1.0
Influence Line Rj
a h i j
Influence Line Ra i j
a -0.15
1.0 1.15
Influence Line Ri a i j
0.4 0.5
e f g h j
Influence Line Qf
d
-0.5 -0.4
-1.0 -1.0
e f g j
Influence Line Mf h
d
1.25
0.95 0.55
0.65 0.45
a b 0.2 j
Influence Line Qk
-0.1 c d e f g h i -0.15
-0.4
212 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
a b c d e f g h i -0.75
Influence Line Mk j
0.8 1.5 1.0
2.25
3.25
3.95 2.75
The main girder is cut at d and then equilibrium is considered for the whole structure as follow:
0.55
Influence Line Qd a d i j
-0.45 -0.15
-1.35
a d i
Influence Line Md j
4.95
EXAMPLE 4.11
Construct the influence lines for Qb, Mb, Nc(left), a b c d
Qc(left), Mc(left), and Mc(bottom) for the frame shown.
1 4m
2
e
SOLUTION
6m 4m 3m
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 213
0.894R a
Ra
Xe
10 − x
Then, Ra =
10.73
Fy = 0: Ye = 1 − 0.894 Ra
Fx = 0: Xe = 0.447 Ra
0.93
0.372
Influence Line Ra d
a b c
-0.28
0.417
0.167
Influence Line Xe d
a b c
-0.125
0.833
0.333
Influence Line Ya d
a b c
-0.25
1.25
1.0
0.667
0.167
Influence Line Ye
a b c d
0.894R a
Qb
Ra
Xe
Ye
Y = 0 (for right side): Qb = – Ye
Mb = 0 (for right side): Mb = 4 Ye – 4 Xe
214 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
0.894R Qb
a
Ra
Xe
Ye
Fy = 0 (for left side): Qb = 0.894 Ra
Mb = 0 (for left side): Mb = 0.894 Ra 6 = 5.364 Ra
0.33
a b c d
Influence Line Qb
-0.167 -0.25
-0.67
-1.5
-1.0
b c
Influence Line Mb
a d
2.0
0.894R a Mc(B)
Ra
Mc(B)= -4X e
e
Xe
Ye
-1.67
- 0.67
Influence Line Mc(bottom) d
a b c
0.5
0.894R Q c(L)
a
Ra
Q c(L)= -Ya
Mc(L)= -4X e Xe
Ye
Fy = 0 (for right side): Qc(left) = – Ye
Mb = 0 (for right side): Mb(left) = – 4 Xe
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 215
0.894R Q c(L)
a
Ra
Q c(L)= 0.894R a ; Mc(L)= 0.894R a (10)
Xe
Ye
a b c d
Influence Line Qc(left)
-0.167 -0.25
-1.0
-2.5
-1.67
Influence Line Mc(left)
a b c d
Nc(L) = -Xe Xe
Ye
Fx = 0 (for right side): Nc(left) = – Xe
0.125
a b c
Influence Line Nc(left) d
-0.417
EXAMPLE 4.12
Construct the influence lines for Qc, Mb, Ndf, Qdf, Mdf, b c d e
Qdc and Mdc for the frame shown.
6m
a f
SOLUTION 6m 6m 3m
216 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Ya Yf
1 kN
d e
b c
1 kN
For unit load between c and e: d e
b c
X = Y a (6/6)
X X
Ya Yf
Mc = 0 (for left side): X = 6/6 Ya = Ya
1.0
0.6
Influence Line Ya 0.2
b c d e
0.8 1.0
0.4
Influence Line Yf
b c d e
0.6
0.2
Influence Line X
b c d e
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 217
Mb = -6X
Mb = 0 (for column ab): Mb = – 6 X X X
Ya Yf
a
-3.6
Influence Line Mb
b c d e
X Q dc = -Yf X
Mdc =3Yf - 6X
Ya Yf
X Q dc = Ya X
Ya Mdc =12Y a - 6X
Yf
0.2
b c e
Influence Line Qdc
d
-0.8
-2.4
d e
Influence Line Mdc b c
1.2
218 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
in
XS
X Cos =0.447
Sin =0.894 X
Ya s
X C in
o Yf
Yf C
Yf S
os
N =0 (for member df): Ndf = – X Cos – Yf Sin = – 0.447X – 0.894Yf
Q =0 (for member df): Qdf = X Sin – Yf Cos = 0.894X – 0.447Yf
Md = 0 (for member df): Mdf = 3Yf – 6X
b c d e
Influence Line Ndf
-0.626 -0.894
0.358
d e
Influence Line Qdf b c
-0.447
-2.4
Influence Line Mdf d e
b c
EXAMPLE 4.13
Construct the influence lines for Qb, Mb, Ngh, Mca, Qcg, a b c e f g
Mcg, and Mf for the frame shown.
4m
d h
SOLUTION 4m 3m 2m 3m 3m
0.6R h
Mh =0 (for right portion): Qe = 0, and Rh = 0 Xd h
Yd Rh 0.8R h
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 219
0.6R h
Xd h
Yd Rh 0.8R h
1.0
0.5
a b c
Influence Line Qe e f g
1.25
0.625
Influence Line Rh a b c e
f g
R a = (1)(7-x)/7 Xd 0.6R h
Yd = 1-R a h
Xd = 0 Yd 0.8R h
R h=0
Md = 0 (for left portion): Ra = (7 – x) / 7
Fy = 0 (for left portion): Yd = 1 – Ra = x / 7
1.0
0.429
c e f g
Influence Line Ra a b
-0.286
-0.429
220 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
1.286
1.0
0.571 0.429
Influence Line Yd
a b c e f g
0.75
0.375
a b c e
Influence Line Xd f g
Xd=0 0.6R h
Q b = -Yd h
Fy = 0 (for right portion): Qb = – Yd Mb = 3Yd Yd
R h=0 0.8R h
Mb = 0 (for right portion): Mb = 3 Yd
0.429
a c e f g
Influence Line Qb b
-0.286 -0.429
-0.571
-1.714
-1.143
Influence Line Mb a b c
e f g
1.714
1 kN c
a Mcg Mcg g
Q cg Q cg = 0
Ra Mcg = 0
Xd=0 0.6R h
Mc = 0: (for right portion), Mcg = 0 h
Yd 0.8R h
Rh =0
Ra Q cg
Xd =0.6R h 0.6R h
h
Q cg = R a +Yd
Yd Rh 0.8R h
Mcg = 7R a + 4X d
1.0 1.0
Xd =0 0.6R h
Mc = 0 (for right portion): Mca = 0 h
Yd R h=0 0.8R h
Ra
Mc = 0 (for left portion): Mca = 7 Ra Mca = 7R a
0.6R h
h
Xd
Yd Rh 0.8R h
222 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
-3.0
-2.0
a b c e f g
Influence Line Mf
1.5
EXAMPLE 4.14
Construct the influence lines for reactions, Mb, Qc, Mc, b c d e f
Mh, Ndg, Neg, and Nfg for the frame shown.
2m
g
4m
a h
4m 4m 4m 4m
SOLUTION
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 223
X
h X
Mh
Ya Yh
X = 0 , Ya =1 kN
Yh = 0 , and Mh = 0
X = 0, Ya =0
Yh = 1 kN, and Mh = 0
1.0
0.6
Influence Line Ya e f
b c d
-0.6
224 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
1.6
1.0
0.4
Influence Line Yh
b c d e f
0.8
f
Influence Line X
b c d e
-0.8
-3.2
b c d e
Influence Line Mh f
3.2
Mb = -6X Yh
X
a
Mb = 0 (for column ab): Mb = – 6 X Ya
-4.8
e f
Influence Line Mb b c d
4.8
X a
Ya
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 225
0.6
c d e f
Influence Line Qd
b
-0.2
-0.4 -0.6
b c d e f
Influence Line Nfg
-2.239
b c d e f
Influence Line Neg
-1.0
b c d e f
Influence Line Ndg
-0.897
-1.336
0.8 0.6
Influence Line Qc b c e f
-0.2 d
-0.6
-2.4
b c e f
Influence Line Mc
d
0.8
2.4
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 227
EXAMPLE 4.16
Construct the influence lines for Fbd, Fde, Fef, Fdg, Feg, c f h k
o
Feh, Ffh, Fab, and Fgh.
3m
The unit load is applied to the upper chord. b e j
n
3m
a l
d g i
SOLUTION
4 at 4.5 m = 18 m
1 kN s 1 s2 h
Influence Lines for Reactions c f k o
5 .4
3 1
b e 4.5 j n
The influence lines for reactions can be determined by
considering the equilibrium conditions and are given as a l
d g i
follow: Ra Rl
1.0
0.75
0.5 0.25
Influence Line of Ra
c f h k o
1.0
0.75
0.25 0.5
Influence Line of Rl
c f h k o
c f h k o
Influence Line of Ffh
-0.563
0.563
F eg
F de
c f h k
Considering section s2-s2, F fh o
F eh
b e j n
F eg
a F dg l
d g i
Ra Rl
For unit load between c and f:
0.225
h k
Influence Line of Feh c o
f
-0.225
-0.45
0.45
0.225
Influence Line of Feg c f o
h k
-0.225
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 229
0.45
0.225
k o
Influence Line of Fgj c f h
-0.225
c f h k o
Influence Line of Fgh
-0.5
The force in this member can be obtained by the same way as member eg, then
Fbd = 5.41/6 Rl = 0
Feg = 5.41/6 Ra
0.676
Fbd F de
Fy = 0 (at joint d): Fdl = – 3/5.41 Fbd
Joint d
F ad d F dg
0.375
0.25
Influence Line of Fde
c f h k o
230 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
0.25
c f
Influence Line of Fef h k o
-0.625
c f h k o
Influence Line of Fab
-1.0
EXAMPLE 4.17
Construct the influence lines for Fef, Feg, Ffg, Ffh, Fgi, b d f h j
l
and Fgj.
3m
The unit load is applied to the lower chord.
a c e g i k
SOLUTION 5 at 4 m = 20 m
1.5
1.0
0.5
Influence Line of Rc i k
a c e g
-0.5 -1.0
1.5 2.0
1.0
a c 0.5
Influence Line of Rg -0.5
e g i k
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 231
Rc
Mg = 0 (for right portion): Ffh = 0 Rg
0.67
a i k
Influence Line of Feg c e g
-0.67
-1.33
0.83
c e g i k
Influence Line of Ffg a
-0.83
-1.67
a c g F gi i k
e
For unit load between a and i
Rc Rg
Mj = 0 (for right portion): Fgi = 0
a c e g i k
Influence Line of Fgi
-1.33
a c e g i k
Influence Line of Fgj
-1.67 -1.67
1.0
EXAMPLE 4.18
Construct the influence lines for Fab, Fac, Fbc, Fbd, Fbe, and Fce. e
c g 2m
The unit load is applied to the lower chord.
7m
a h
b d f
SOLUTION
7m 7m 7m 7m
1.0 0.75
0.5
Influence Line of Ra 0.25
a b d f h
0.75 1.0
0.5
0.25
Influence Line of Rh
a b d f h
Ra F ab
For unit load between b and h
1.0 0.75
0.5
0.25
Influence Line of Fab
a b d f h
0.75 1.0
0.5
Influence Line of Fac 0.25
a b d f h
Fy = 0 (at joint c): Fbc = 2/7.28 Fce – 7/9.9 Fac = – 0.505 Fac Joint c F bc
0.536
0.357
0.179
Influence Line of Fbc
a b d f h
a b d f h
Influence Line of Fce
-0.78
234 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
0.778
b F bd
0.588
d f h
Influence Line of Fbd
a b
-0.452
EXAMPLE 4.19
Construct the influence lines for Fbd, Fcd, Fce, Fdh, Ffg, c e h k m
and Fgh. a n 4.5 m
The unit load is applied to chord abdgiln. g
b d i l 4.5 m
f
6 at 6 m = 36 m
SOLUTION
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 235
1.0
Influence line for Ra 0.67
0.33
a b d g i l n
1.0
0.67 0.67
0.33 0.33
Influence line for Rf
a b d g i l n
1.0
0.67
0.33
Influence line for Rn
a b d g i l n
a b d g i l n
Influence Line of Fce
-0.89
0.89
Influence Line of Fbd
a b d g i l n
236 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
0.56
-0.56
Influence Line for Ffg
a b d g i l n
Influence Line of Ffg
-1.0
Influence Lines for Fgh
a b d g i l n
Influence Line of Fgh
-0.67 -0.67
Influence Line for Fdh
a Fdh n
b d g i l
For unit load between a and d: (Fdf = 0, Rn = 0) Fdf f
Ra Rn
Rf
Fy = 0 (for right portion): Fdh = 7.5/4.5 Rf
1.11
EXAMPLE 4.20
Construct the influence lines for Fab, Fcd, Fce, Fde, d e g i k l
Ffi, Fgi, Fhi, Fhj, and Fik. b
4m
The unit load is applied to chord bdegikl. c f j
4m
a h
SOLUTION 6 at 5 m = 30m
1.5
1.25
1.0
0.75
0.5
Influence Line Yh 0.25
b d e g i k l
0.625
0.3125 0.3125
Influence Line X k l
b d e g i
-0.3125
-0.625
Influence Line for Fab
b d e g i k l
Influence Line Fab
-0.5
-1.0
238 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
b d e g i k l
Influence Line Fcd
-1.0
X a h X
Ya Yh
For unit load between b and d
b d e g i k l
Influence Line Fde
-0.625
0.8
0.4
Influence Line Fce e g i
b d k l
-0.8
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 239
c f j
F fh
X a h X
For unit load between b and g Ya Yh
1.25
b d e g i
Influence Line Fgi k l
-0.625
0.8
X a h X
Ya Yh
For unit load between b and i:
1.25
b d e g i k l
Influence Line Fhj
-1.6
Yh
Substituting for Ffh in this equation leads to
Fhi = – Yh – 1.25 Fhj + 0.8 X
b d e g i k l
Influence Line Fhi
-1.0
EXAMPLE 4.21
Construct the influence lines for Fce, Fde, Fdf, Fdg, Feg, e i m
Fgh, Ffg, and Fei. c g o 3m
k
The unit load is applied to the lower chord. a p 3m
b d f h j l n
SOLUTION
8 at 3 m = 24
s1 i
Influence Lines for Reactions s2
e m
3
g 3 o
4
1 kN c
2
k
4.
a p
b d f h j l n
Ra Rp
1.0
0.75 0.5
Influence Line Ra 0.25
a b d f h j l n p
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 241
1.0
0.5 0.75
0.25
Influence Line Rp
a b d f h j l n p
-1.0
1.125
0.75
0.5
Influence Line Fdf
a b d f h j l n p
0.707
a b d f h j l n p
Influence Line Fdg
-0.707
0.707
a b d f h j l n p
Influence Line Fce
-1.06
1.0
EXAMPLE 4.22
Construct the influence lines for Fab, Fad, Fbc, Fcd, f
Fbe, Fce, Fdf, and Fef. d i 1m
The unit load is applied to chord acehj.
a c h j 3m
SOLUTION e 2m
b g
4m 4m 4m 4m
1.5
1.0
Influence Line Rb 0.5
j
a c e h
-0.5
1.5
1.0
-0.5
a
Influence Line Rg c e h j
-0.5
244 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
0.515 0.515
0.625 0.625
c e h
Influence Line Fad
a j
-0.625
0.25
-0.25 -0.25
0.84
a c e h
Influence Line Fab j
-0.84
-1.4
1.25 F bc
0.75
Influence Line Fce j
a c e h
-1.25
0.84
a c e h
Influence Line Fbe j
-0.84
-1.4
a j
Influence Line Fef c e h
-0.25 -0.25
246 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
a c 0.25 h j
Influence Line Fbc
e 0.25
-0.25
-1.0
Once an influence line for a function, such as reaction, normal, shear, or moment, is
determined, it can be used to determine the value of the function when any loading system is
applied to the structure. This is valid if the structure is linearly elastic and the principle of
superposition is allowed.
EXAMPLE 4.23
Calculate the reaction at b, and shear and moment at c 15 kN 30 kN 10 kN
3m 2m 4m
for the shown beam and load configuration. a b d e
c
2m 5m 3m 3m
SOLUTION
1.25
1.0
Influence Line Rb 0.625
0.375
d e
a b -0.125
-0.375
0.25 0.375
d e
Influence Line Qc a b c
-0.125
-0.375 -0.375
-0.625
-1.875
-0.75 -0.625
Influence Line Mc c
a b d e
1.125
1.875
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 247
The required internal forces are determined by multiplying the respective influence-line
ordinates under the load by the value of the load. Using the shown influence lines for reaction
at a, and shear and moment at c, the required values are calculated as follow:
Consider the structural segment shown in Fig. 4.1a, which subjected to a uniformly
distributed downward load of intensity w between points a and b. Let us assume that the
influence line ordinates for Mc are represented by function f(x) as shown in Fig. 4.1c. The load
on a small element dx is wdx and can be taken as a concentrated load. The effect of this
infinitesimal load on Mc is
dc M = w dx f ( x )
b
Mc = w f ( x ) dx = w area of influence-line diagram below the load
a
For uniformly distributed load w, longer than the span of simply supported beam,
shown in Fig 4.1a, and moving from right to left, the maximum positive shear at C, Qc(Pos.),
will occur when the front of the load has just reached C. In such case, it is equal to w times the
area BdC. Similarly, the maximum negative Qc(Neg) will occur when the rear of the load has
reached c, and it is equal to w times the area Ad’C, as shown in Fig. 4.1b. On the other hand,
the maximum positive bending moment at c is obtained when the live load cover the entire
length of the beam. In thus case, the maximum moment Mc due to uniformly distributed load
longer than span is equal to w times the area AoB shown in Fig. 4.1c.
A C B
2m 4m
(b) Influence line for shear (c) Influence line for bending moment
Fig. 4.1 Beam under uniformly distributed load longer than span
248 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
For uniformly distributed load that is shorter than the span, again two cases have to be
considered for shear at C, the front and rear of the load at C as shown in Fig. 4.2b. The
maximum moment Mc due to uniformly distributed load shorter than span will found when the
area stqp, shown in Fig. 4.2c, is maximum, that is when the front of the load is at distance m
from the point C. In order to derive this, the sum of areas Ats and Bpq is a minimum. Thus,
m a
= ……………………………..…………..………………(4.1)
r L
w
a
m
A s C p B
M +
t q
or
Fig. 4.2 Beam under uniformly distributed load shorter than span
EXAMPLE 4.24
Calculate the maximum bending moment and shear 50 kN/m
force at C for the beam AB due to moving
3m
uniformly distributed load of 50 kN/m and of length
A C B
3m.
4m
SOLUTION 10 m
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 249
The maximum negative shear at C is produced when the front of uniform load is at C.
50 kN/m
0.6 + 0.3
Qc = 50 3 = 67.5 kN
2
The maximum negative shear at C is produced when the rear of uniform load is at C.
50 kN/m
Load position for Max. 0.6
negative shear at C A C + B
-
-0.1
-0.4
−0.4 − 0.1
Qc = 50 3 = −37.5 kN
2
To get the load position which give maximum bending moment at C, the criteria given in Eq.
(4.1) is applied
50 kN/m
r = 3m
m r-m
Load position for Max. A C B
bending at C +
M1 M2
a = 4m 2.4 L-a = 6m
m a
=
r L
m 4
=
3 10
a−m 4 − 1.2
M1 = 2.4 = 2.4 = 1.68 kN.m
a 4
250 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
M2 = M1 = 1.68 kN.m
1.68 + 2.4 1.68 + 2.4
M c = 50 1.2 + 1.8 = 306 kN.m
2 2
Many structures are subjected to a series of rolling or moving concentrated loads, which
are of various magnitudes and spacing, such as a moving train crossing a bridge. For such
loads, the critical position of loads is only deduced by trial-and-error method using criteria
based on the concept of influence lines. For each category of influence lines, there will be a
corresponding criterion for maximum. Such criteria is derived for common types of influence-
lines diagrams as those shown in Fig. 4.3.
This type of influence line corresponds to the end reaction of a simply supported beam,
girder, or truss. Now, consider the simply supported beam AB subjected to a group of loads
P1, P2, P3, and P4, with resultant R acting at a distance x from B, as shown in Fig. 4.4a. The
maximum value of the reaction RA is determined by constructing the influence-line diagram for
RA as shown in Fig. 4.4b. In this case, the influence-line ordinate corresponding to the resultant
R is x/L. Thus
x
RA = R
L
The maximum value of RA is obtained when the term x/L is greatest for the same value
of R (i.e., there is no wheel entering or leaving the span during the load movement). In other
case in which a change in R occurs, the greatest value of R(x/L) will yield the maximum reaction
in question. Such a maximum value will always occur when one wheel is placed over the
support in question.
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 251
x
R
P1 P2 P3 P4 1.0
A B x/L
L
RA RB
Fig. 4.4 Load position for maximum value for influence line diagram of type 1
EXAMPLE 4.25
Determine the maximum reaction RA for the beam and load 60 kN 180 kN 220 kN 150 kN
shown in figure. 1 2 3 4
2m 2.5 m 2.5 m
A B
SOLUTION
15 m
RA RB
2m 2.5 m 2.5 m 8m
2.5 m 2.5 m 10 m
220 kN 150 kN
3 4
1.0 0.833
2.5 m 12.5 m
It is noticed that maximum reaction RA = 463.3 kN is obtained when load 2 is over support A
P1 P2 P3 P4
A B
C
a b
RA L RB
R x R x +d
d d
P3 P4 P1 P2 P3 P4
P1 P2
A A B
B
C C
Rx
( Qc )1 = RA =
L
When the load P1 passes C, there will be a sudden decrease in shear force by amount of P1. As
the loads move to the left, the value of positive shear will again increase until the load P2 is
just to the right of C as shown in Fig. 4.5c and the shear at C is
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 253
R (x + d)
( Qc )2 = RA − P1 = − P1
L
The total change in shear force between the previous two cases is given by
Rd
Qc = (Qc )2 − (Qc )1 = − P1
L
Rd R P1
(Qc)2 is greater when P1 or (4.2a)
L L d
Rd R P1
(Qc)1 is greater when P1 or (4.2b)
L L d
The above criterion is valid provided there is no load entering of leaving the span.
EXAMPLE 4.26
Find the maximum and minimum shear forces at midspan C for 60 kN 180 kN 220 kN 150 kN
the beam AB due to the given moving loads. 1 2 3 4
2 m 2.5 m 2.5 m
A C B
Therefore, this position doesn’t produce the maximum shear force and the maximum shear
force is produced from the second trial when load 2 reaches at C
254 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
1 2 3 4
0.5 0.333 0.167
+
-
-0.367 -0.5
Applying the above criterion (Eq. 4.2) to the first 60 kN 180 kN 220 kN 150 kN
Therefore, this position produces the maximum negative shear force at C. The shear force is
calculated using the influence line diagram at C as follow
This type of influence line corresponds to bending moment in simply supported beam
and an axial force in chord members of some trusses. To establish the maximum value of such
a function, let us consider the load group in Fig. 4.6a passing over the simply supported beam
AB. The influence line for moment at C is shown in Fig. 4.6b. The problem in hand is to
determine the position of loads group that produces maximum bending moment at C. Let R1
is the resultant of all loads on the beam to the left of C and R2 of those loads to the right of the
C. The bending moment at C for this load position is given by
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 255
P1 P2 P3 P4 R1 R2
A x1 x2
B
A C B
C
a b y1 M y2
L
x x
M c = R1 y1 + R2 y2 = R1 1 M + R2 2 M
a b
When the loads move a small distance dx to the left, with the value R1 and R2 remaining
unchanged. The change in moment Mc is
M
( −dx ) + R2 dx
M
dM c = R1
a b
M M
= R2 − R1 dx
b a
So, as long as R2 / b > R1 / a, the bending moment at C will increase and the movement of the
load to the left must be continued until one load in group R2 reaches at C.
EXAMPLE 4.27
Calculate the maximum bending moment at midspan 60 kN 180 kN 220 kN 150 kN
(C) for the simply supported beam AB and load 2m 2.5m 2.5m
1 2 3 4
group shown in figure A C B
Trial 1: Load 2 is at C
60 kN 180 kN 220 kN 150 kN
2m 2.5m 2.5m
1 2 3 4
A C B
1.25
2.75 2.5
3.75
a = 7.5 m b = 7.5 m
R1 60 R2 550
Load 2 is included in R2: = =
a 7.5 7.5 7.5
R1 240 R2 370
Load 2 is included in R1: = =
a 7.5 7.5 7.5
256 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
1.5
2.5 2.5
3.75
Applying the previous criterion, we find that
R1 240 R2 370
Load 3 is included in R2: = =
a 7.5 7.5 7.5
R1 460 R2 150
Load 3 is included in R1: = =
a 7.5 7.5 7.5
Therefore, this load position causes the maximum bending moment at C. Using influence line
diagram of Mc, the maximum bending moment at C is calculated as
Mc = (60) (1.5)+ (180) (2.5) + (220) (3.75) + (150) (2.5) = 1740 kN.m
The maximum absolute value of shear and moment is required for design purpose.
Absolute maximum shear will always occur at a section or panel adjacent to one of supports.
In simply supported beam subjected to a group of moving loads, the maximum bending
moment does not usually occur at midspan. Consider a simply supported beam AB subjected
to a group of moving load as shown in Fig. 4.7. It is required to determine the bending moment
under load Pm which is assumed to be maximum. Let R represents the resultant of all loads on
the beam and RL represents the resultant of all loads to the left of Pm but still on the beam. The
left end reaction RA is obtained by taking moments about B, then
RL a R x
Pm b
A B
L-x-b C.L.
RA L RB
Rx
RA =
L
Rx
M = RA ( L − x − b ) − RL a = ( L − x − b ) − RL a
L
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 257
dM R
= 0 = ( L − 2x − b )
dx L
Thus, L–x–b=x
This result states that, the centerline of the span bisect the distance between Pm and R.
For a single wheel load on the beam, this criterion implies locating the wheel load at midspan.
With more than one load on the beam, the maximum moment is always near midspan. Such
moment will occur under the load that is closest to the resultant R.
EXAMPLE 4.28
Determine the absolute maximum bending for the R = 610 kN
simply supported beam loaded as shown 60 kN 180 kN 220 kN 150 kN
1 2 3 4
0.283 0.283
R A=316.5 kN C.L. RB =293.5 kN
SOLUTION
Since load 3 is closest to the resultant R, then the loads group is placed in a position in
which the centerline of the span bisects the distance between load 3 (220 kN) and the resultant
R. Then, the distance between the resultant load and the centerline is 0.283 m. The absolute
maximum moment is calculated under load 3 (220 kN) as follow:
With reference to the previous example, the maximum possible moment at center of beam is
1740 kN.m
258 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
Problems
(a) Draw the influence lines for normal force, shearing force, and bending moment at the
indicated sections for the following structures:
a b c d
a
b c d e
3m 4m 3m 1.5 m 1.5 m 1.5 m 2.0 m
(1) (2)
a b c d e a b c d e f g
2m 4m 4m 2m 3m 3m 3m 5m 2m 5m
(3) (4)
a b Stringer c d e f g
b Stringer d h iStringer
a j
k Girder
f Girder 3m
3m 2m 5m 4m 3m 2m2m 3m
4 at 6m = 24 m
(5) (6)
d
b c
2m f g
1 kN
a 3m
a b c d
e
2m
e 4m 4m 4m 4m
2m 2m 2m
(7) (8)
g b d e
c e c
b
d
5m
4m
a
a f
6m 2m 4m 4m
2m 5m 3m 3m
(9) (10)
Influence lines for statically determinate structures 259
f g c f g
b b
e e
c 2m
4m
a 2m
a d d
h
3m 3m 2m 4m 2m
3m 3m 2m 4m 2m
(11) (12)
(b) Draw the influence lines for normal force in marked members for the following trusses:
1 kN
c e g a c e g
1 kN
3m 3m
a h b f
b d f 1.5 m
40 kN d
3m 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m
4 at 4 m = 16m
(13) (14)
g
e i 3m f h k
3m c 3m
c k 1 kN e j m
1 kN
a 3m
a l 3m n
b d g i l
b d f h j
6 at 4 m = 24m
6 at 4 m =24 m
(15) (16)
g k o r o
c n p
5m 3m
1 kN k
b f j n j l m
5m a 3m
1 kN e i m q i
b c d e f g h
a 5m
p
d h l 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m
10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m
(17) (18)
1 kN h i j
e i l
c 3m g k n 3m
g c
d e f p 3m
4m a
a b b d f h j m o
3m 8m 8m 3m 8 at 4 m 32 m
(19) (20)
260 Structural analysis I, by Prof. Dr. Ahmed Zubydan.
g h
f
e g j 1 kN 6m
5m a
c d h k e
b d
a l 5m 6m
b f i c
4 at 10 m = 40 m 6 at 4 m =24 m
(21) (22)