Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, Vol. 92(6), Serial No. 95, Nov 2017
Results:
There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to control of
vertigo (P=0.866, P=0.879 for 1 and 6 months post injection, respectively). PTA improvement was
statistically significantly higher in the methylprednisolone group (P=0.006).
Conclusion:
In summary, intratympanic corticosteroid is an effective treatment for Meniere's disease and can
prevent other invasive treatments. Intratympanic methylprednisolone can improve hearing level to a
greater extent than intratympanic dexamethasone, but the two groups were similarly beneficial in
controlling vertigo. However, there was a trend toward a more sustained benefit with
methylprednisolone.
Keywords:
Dexamethasone, Intratympanic injection, Meniere disease, Methylprednisolone, Vertigo.
341
Introduction and methylprednisolone has a greater binding
Meniere's disease (MD) is an inner-ear affinity for this receptor than dexamethasone
disease manifesting with symptoms of
frequent vertigo (96.2%), tinnitus (91.1%),
sensorineural hearing loss (87.7%), and aural
fullness, which occurs because of (15). In one study, the use of IT
endolymphatic hydrops (1). The prevalence methylprednisolone was shown to achieve a
of MD varies internationally; for example, 90% reduction in vertigo attacks in intractable
10.7 in 100,000 individuals in Japan and 513 MD (16).
per 100,000 people in Finland have been To the best of our knowledge, there are no
reported to suffer from MD (1). This may be data on whether different corticosteroids differ
because of different diagnostic criteria or in terms of MD management. In this study, we
follow-up periods (2). The pathogenesis of compared the results of IT injections of
the disease is endolymphatic hydrops, and the dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in MD
most plausible theory is insufficient patients based on a functional-level scale of
absorption of endolymph by the audiometry and a class outcome measure of
endolymphatic sac (1). vertigo.
There is no single diagnostic test for the
diagnosis of MD, and its best definition is M
based on the criteria of the American a
Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck
Surgery (AAO–HNS). The AAO–HNS t
criteria for the diagnosis of MD include e
vertigo, hearing loss and tinnitus. On this r
basis, MD is divided into possible, probable, i
definite and certain forms (1). MD symptoms a
such as vertigo, drop attacks, tinnitus, aural
fullness and hearing loss can severely affect
l
the patient’s quality of life (3). The available s
treatment options are lifestyle modification
(salt and caffeine intake limitation and a
adequate hydration), medical therapy n
(primarily consisting of diuretics and
d
injections of intratympanic [IT]
corticosteroids or gentamicin),
decompression of the endolymphatic sac, and M
vestibular nerve section (4). The use of e
topical steroids (IT injection), allowing the t
appropriate cumulative dose in the desired
h
tissues without systemic use of the steroids
and associated side effects, seems logical (5). o
Due to the ototoxicity risks, many therapists d
prefer to use an IT corticosteroid injection s
instead of gentamicin (6). According to the
current literature, IT dexamethasone Eighty patients with a definite MD diagnosis
injections can safely improve MD symptoms according AAO–HNS criteria (refractory to
(vertigo and hearing loss but not tinnitus) and treatment with salt restriction, diuretics, and
the patient’s quality of life (2,7-12), although betahistine for 3 months) referred to Amir
some studies report that this effect is Alam Hospital between July 2015 and
transitory (9,13,14) Methylprednisolone can December 2016 were enrolled in this study
result in higher concentrations of steroid in after providing written consent. Inclusion
the perilymphatic fluid. criteria were age greater than 18 years, no
On the other hand, studies have shown that history of other otologic diseases, normal
mineralocorticoid receptor binding has an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and
important role in the improvement of hearing, no history of neurological disorders. Patients
considered statistically signficant. As the data Vertigo was recorded based on AAO–HNS
distribution was non-normal, nonparametric criteria (Table.2) at three cut-off points:
statistics were used. before, 1 month and 6 months after the last
injection. Results are presented in Table 6.
R Within-group comparisons revealed
e significant differences in vertigo between pre-
treatment and 1 month after the last injection
s (P<0.001), between pre-treatment and 6
u months after the last injection (P=0.002), and
l between 1 month and 6 months after the last
t injection (P=0.001) in the methylprednisolone
s group and in vertigo between pre-treatment
and 1 month after the last injection (P<0.001)
and between 1 month and 6 months after the
Demographic data are presented in Table 3. last injection (P<0.001) in the dexamethasone
Before the intervention, there was no group.
significant difference in hearing levels between
the two groups (Table.4). However, there was a
significant difference in hearing level between
the two groups 6 months after intervention
(Table.5).
Total 22 45 2
*significant difference
Table 6: Vertigo, before, one and six months after intervention between the two groups
Study group Total
Variable Group A Group B Group C
p-value
MP Dex MP Dex MP Dex
Vertigo before intervention 0 0 20 27 13 9 0.301
Vertigo after 1 month 18 21 11 12 4 3 0.866
Vertigo after 6 month 7 6 17 19 9 11 0.879
MP, Methylprednisolone; Dex, Dexamethasone