Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/235280419
CITATIONS READS
212 7,627
1 author:
Christian Grönroos
Hanken School of Economics
134 PUBLICATIONS 41,089 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Christian Grönroos on 17 November 2015.
Introduction
Traditionally, services have been thought of as locally produced solutions,
and service firms have been considered local establishments. Although
services still, to a large extent, are produced by small and local firms, service
businesses have become more international. The service sector is expanding
over national borders. The Uruguay Round and the 1993 General Agreement
on Tariffs and Trade Agreement (GATT) have lowered barriers for
international trade with services. A rapid globalization of the world economy
during the 1990s, which probably will continue in the next millennium, has
increased the opportunities for marketing services abroad (Hassan and
Kaynak, 1994). Indeed, services are the fastest growing part of international
trade (Bradley, 1995). However, for example, in the USA the export of
services still accounts for an astonishingly small proportion of total service
production, only around 6 percent in 1997, in spite of a growth of nearly
30 percent since the beginning of the decade (Winstead and Patterson, 1998).
Relatively slow growth In the European Union between 10 and 20 percent of the service production
was exported already almost ten years ago (cf. Dahringer, 1991). According
to Winstead and Patterson (1998), the relatively slow growth of the
internationalization of service, in spite of the improved free-trade conditions,
depends on the existence of significant non-tariff barriers in many service
industries and the complex nature of service production as well as on a belief
among practitioners in service businesses that it is difficult to market
services outside domestic markets. They also state that more general
obstacles for internationalization, which are true for manufactured goods as
well, keep service firms from going abroad. Such obstacles are a lack of
resources, too little knowledge about exporting and a belief that linguistic
and cultural differences will make internationalization too demanding. The
purpose of this article is to discuss some key challenges for service firms
planning to go abroad and to present five different types of
internationalization strategies for services.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
http://www.emerald-library.com
290 JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, VOL. 13 NO. 4/5 1999, pp. 290-297, # MCB UNIVERSITY PRESS, 0887-6045
The internationalization challenge
A traditional way for service firms to start going abroad is to follow
manufacturers that they are supplying with services in their domestic
markets. When their clients internationalize, they get an opportunity to go
along and sometimes almost are forced to do so (Weinstein, 1977;
Vandermerwe and Chadwick, 1989). For example, in studies of the banking
and advertising industries, following clients was found to be a major reason
for internationalizing (Nigh et al., 1986; Terpstra and Yu, 1988). Now, ways
of internationalizing services have become more diverse as, for example, the
development of new technologies for electronic commerce has made
services less dependant on local operations (Winsted and Patterson, 1998).
Most of the literature Most of the literature on internationalization, international marketing and
geared to the export strategies is geared to the needs of the manufacturing sector. In many
manufacturing sector studies of manufacturing firms, for example, the impact on export behavior
of firm characteristics such as size, age, ownership and sales has been
investigated (e.g. Burton and Schlegelmilch, 1987; Cavusgil and Nevin,
1981). However, in a recently reported study by Javalgi et al. (1998) such
firm characteristics do not seem to differentiate exporting service businesses
from non-exporting. Even in 1990, Erramilli and Rao (1990) noticed that we
know very little about how service firms enter foreign markets, and their
observation holds true even today. ``For international services, theory lags
practice by a considerable degree'' (Clark et al., 1996, p. 9). It is a fact that
international marketing of services is becoming a considerable part of total
service marketing. The academic community has a responsibility to fill the
knowledge gap that exists today.
In the literature on international marketing of services, an
internationalization strategy is often considered more risky for service firms
than for manufacturers of goods (Carman and Langeard, 1980). One reason
for this is that in many services the producer and the production facilities are
part of the service, which requires that the firm has greater control of its
resources than would otherwise be the case (Palmer and Cole, 1995). In
traditional international marketing models focusing on the needs of
manufacturing firms, the internationalization process can start in a minor
scale using indirect export channels followed by a step-by-step move
towards more direct channels. This enables the firm gradually to increase its
understanding of quality expectations, personnel requirements, distribution
and media structures, and buying behavior peculiarities on the foreign
market. For service firms the situation is different. One way or the other, it
immediately faces all this and other problems related to entering a foreign
market, (Carman and Langeard, 1980). It has to find an entry mode and a
strategy that helps it to cope with this situation as well as possible. The
choice of course depends on the type of service and market.
Export strategies
Direct export of services may basically take place on industrial markets.
Consultants and firms repairing and maintaining valuable equipment may
have their base on the domestic market and whenever needed move the
resources and system required to produce the service to the client abroad.
Repair services on valuable equipment are often exported in this way. Some
consultants work in a similar fashion. No step-by-step learning can take
place as the service has to be produced immediately. Because of this, the risk
of making mistakes can be substantial.
Opportunity to expand Systems export is a joint export effort by two or more firms whose solutions
markets abroad complement each others. A service firm may support a goods-exporting firm
or another service firm. For example, when a manufacturer delivers
equipment or turn-key factories to international buyers, a need for
engineering services, distribution, cleaning, security and other services is
often present. This gives service firms an opportunity to expand their
markets abroad. As the literature suggests, systems export is the traditional
Entry strategies
Direct entry means that the service firm establishes a service-producing
organization of its own on the foreign market. For manufactured goods in the
first stage of a learning process, a sales office can be such an organization.
For a service firm, a local organization normally has to be able to produce
and deliver the service from the beginning. The time for learning becomes
short. Almost from day one the firm has to be able to cope with problems
with production, human resource management and consumer behavior. In
addition, the local government may consider the new, international service
provider a threat to local firms and even to national pride.
A central issue is to keep In order to decrease the potential problems with a direct entry strategy,
key people instead of establishing a new organization of its own the internationalizing
firm can acquire a local firm operating on the same service market. This way
one gets access to knowledge about the market as well as about how to
manage the service operation in the foreign environment. A central issue in
such an acquisition is to keep the key people in the acquired firm. Without
them the internationalizing service firm may easily find itself in the same
position as when establishing a totally new operation.
Another option is to form a joint venture with a local firm, which offers the
local partner new growth opportunities at the same time as it gives the
international partner much-needed local know-how. Direct entry can be used
for internationalizing consumer services as well as services for industrial
markets. The same goes for the rest of the internationalizing strategies
discussed in this article.
Indirect entry is used when the service firm wants to avoid establishing a
local operation that is totally or partly owned by itself. Nevertheless, the firm
wants to establish a permanent operation in the foreign market. A consulting
firm can, for example, through a licensing agreement give a local firm
exclusive rights to use the professional concept of the firm. This of course
requires that exclusive rights can be guaranteed. In the lodging business and
in the restaurant and food service industries; franchising is an often used
concept for indirect entry into a foreign market. Local service firms get the
exclusive right to a marketing concept, which also may include rights to a
certain operational mode, and in this way the concept can be replicated as
much as existing demand allows all over the foreign market. The
internationalizing firm as the franchisor gets the local knowledge which the
franchisees possess, whereas franchisees get an opportunity to grow with a
new and perhaps well-established concept.
Use of middlemen In a sense, franchising resembles indirect export of manufactured goods,
where the exporter makes use of middlemen on the local market who have
the local knowledge needed to penetrate the market. Another form of indirect
entry is management contracts, which often are used, for example, in the
lodging business.
As far as the need for market knowledge is concerned, indirect entry is
probably the least risky of the internationalization strategies discussed so far.
Conversely, the internationalizing firm's control over the foreign operations
is normally more limited when using this entry strategy.