Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. Purpose Page 4
3. Definitions Page 4
4. Duties Page 5
4.1 Chief Executive
4.2 Managers
4.3 All clinicians working with children and young
people
5. Classification Page 5
6. Pathogenesis Page 5
7. Aetiology Page 6
7.1 Isolated microcephaly
7.2 Syndromic microcephaly
7.3 Neuroanatomic abnormalities
7.4 Metabolic disorders
7.5 Environmental factors
Appendix 1
Selected causes of microcephaly
Appendix 2
Selected syndromes with microcephaly as a
characteristic feature
Appendix 3
Structural brain abnormalities causing microcephaly
Appendix 4
Evaluation of congenital microcephaly
Appendix 5
Evaluation of postnatal-onset microcephaly
The earlier these conditions are detected, the earlier appropriate treatment, services,
and genetic counselling can be provided.
This guideline applies to children and young people up to the age of 18 years.
2. Purpose
This guidance covers the assessment and investigation of microcephaly. The
guidance also covers the management of microcephaly
3. Definitions
The term ‘microcephaly’ is a clinical finding and should not be used as a disease
designation.
Microcephaly is mild when the OFC is between 2 and 3 SD below the mean and
severe when the OFC is greater than 3 SD below the mean.
4.2 Managers
Managers should ensure that staff are aware of and have access to policy guidelines.
Staff training needs should be highlighted and addressed. Appropriate education,
supervision and mechanisms are in place to ensure good practice.
5. Classification
6. Pathogenesis
Metabolic disorders are more likely to cause postnatal onset microcephaly and are
typically associated with global developmental delay
• Hypoxic-ischemic insults.
• Severe malnutrition
8.1 Epilepsy.
Children with microcephaly are more likely to have epilepsy, particularly epilepsy that
is difficult to treat. Certain microcephaly syndromes are associated with a much
higher prevalence of epilepsy.
Early identification of visual and hearing deficits may help with both the identification
of a syndromic diagnosis and the supportive care of the child.
9. Assessment of microcephaly
9.2 Measurement
Occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) should be measured at all initial health visits
between birth and three years of age and in any child with neurologic concerns and
at all subsequent follow up visits in children less than 5 years of age.
The measuring tape should encircle the head and include an area 1 to 2 cm above
the glabella anteriorly and the most prominent portion of the occiput posteriorly. A
paper tape measure should be used and not a plastic one.
Measurement of OFC in the newborn may be unreliable until the third or fourth day of
life since it may be affected by caput succedaneum, cephalohematoma, or molding.
In older infants, the accuracy of the measurement may be affected by thick hair and
deformation or hypertrophy of the cranial bone.
9.3 Monitoring
OFC measurements are most informative when plotted over time. Standards have
been determined for head growth in healthy children between 0 and 18 years of age.
The Child Growth Foundation head circumference chart should be used for children
over one year of age.
The degree of deviation from normal can be difficult to quantitate from standard
charts. A OFC SD table can be used6.
The standard growth curves are not appropriate for monitoring the head size of
children with craniosynostosis, craniofacial syndromes, and children with certain
medical conditions associated with microcephaly (eg, Down syndrome).
Factors that determine the need for laboratory and radiologic evaluation include:
• Age at onset
• History of antenatal insult (infection, toxin, drug, etc)
• Associated features
• Family history
9.6 History
Important aspects of the history in a child with microcephaly include:
• Weight, length, and OFC at birth to establish the onset of microcephaly and to
determine if it is proportionate to weight and length.
• Weight and length trajectories – The child's weight and length (or height)
should also be measured and plotted on standard curves. The weight and
length percentiles should be compared with the OFC percentile.
An abnormal head shape and ridges along the suture lines are suggestive of
craniosynostosis. Overriding sutures and a prominent occiput is suggestive
of foetal disruption sequence. Bitemporal grooving may indicate Miller-Dieker
lissencephaly syndrome.
• Skin – Examination of the skin may provide clues to intrauterine infection (eg,
petechiae and/or jaundice in the newborn) or metabolic disease (eg,
eczematous rash in PKU).
• Evaluation for congenital infection (TORCH screen) if less than 1 year of age
10.2 Neuroimaging
Not every child needs brain imaging, especially as sedation or a general anaesthetic
will be needed in many cases. Neuroimaging studies, which may identify structural
causes of microcephaly, should be considered in any child with primary microcephaly
with an OFC<-6 SD, or significant learning difficulties, or early onset epileptic
seizures, or motor features (especially spasticity or if they are asymptomatic) or if
there is a known diagnosis eg holoprosencephaly, and quantification of cerebral
architecture would guide prognosis. The same general rules apply for secondary
microcephaly.
In children with an OFC 3-6 SD below the mean, and no additional features, there is
a low yield and consideration for other tests more logical.
Specific targeted genetic testing may be considered in the evaluation of the child with
microcephaly in order to determine a specific aetiology
The yield of metabolic testing may be higher when the following are present: a
parental history of consanguinity, a family history of similar symptoms in relatives,
episodic symptoms (seizures, ataxia, vomiting, encephalopathy), developmental
regression, extracranial organ failure, or specific findings on neuroimaging. Metabolic
testing may also have a higher yield in children whose microcephaly remains
unexplained after other evaluations have been done.
11.2 Epilepsy
Consider educating caregivers of children with microcephaly on how to recognize
clinical seizures
12.0 Prognosis
The prognosis for children with microcephaly depends upon the underlying cause.
The prognosis usually is worse for children whose microcephaly is part of a wider
pattern of malformation (eg, trisomy 13, trisomy 18) and for those with intrauterine
infection. The severity of cognitive impairment is also generally related to the severity
of microcephaly.
The initial evaluation includes a history and physical examination of the child and
parents. Factors that determine the urgency and extent of the investigations include
age at onset; history of central nervous system trauma or infection; associated
symptoms, neurodevelopmental abnormalities or syndromic features; and family
history.
14.0 Consultation
This clinical guideline has been discussed with community paediatricians and will be
distributed widely for discussion amongst community paediatricians:
The following paediatricians were consulted about this guideline:
• Managers Informed via DATIX system who then confirm they have
disseminated to staff as appropriate
• Staff via InForm
• Published to the staff zone of the trust website
18.0 Appendices
Appendix 1 Selected causes of microcephaly
Appendix 2 Selected syndromes with microcephaly as a characteristic
feature
Appendix 3 Structural brain abnormalities causing microcephaly
Appendix 4 Flow Chart - Evaluation of congenital microcephaly
Appendix 5 Flow Chart - Evaluation of postnatal-onset microcephaly
Neuroanatomic abnormalities
• Neural tube defects (eg, anencephaly, hydranencephaly, encephalocele)
• Holoprosencephaly
• Atelencephaly (aprosencephaly)
• Lissencephaly
• Schizencephaly
• Polymicrogyria
• Pachygyria (macrogyria)
• Fetal brain disruption sequence
Metabolic disorders
• Maternal diabetes mellitus
• Untreated maternal phenylketonuria
• Phenylketonuria
• Methylmalonic aciduria
• Citrullinemia
• Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Environmental causes
• Congenital infection (eg, cytomegalovirus,herpes simplex virus, rubella, varicella,
toxoplasmosis, human immunodeficiencyvirus, syphilis, enterovirus)
• Meningitis
• In utero drug or toxin exposure (eg, alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, cocaine,heroin,
antineoplastic agents, antiepileptic agents, radiation, toluene)
• Perinatal insult (eg, hypogycemia, hypothyroidims, hypopituitarism,
hypoadrenocorticism)
• Anoxia/ischemia
Seckel syndrome Pre- and postnatal growth retardation, average birth weight
approximately 1540 g, proportionate short stature;
micrognathia, facial asymmetry, downslanting palpebral
fissures, prominent beaked nose; limb hypoplasia; gap
between first and second toes
Data from:
1. Abuelo D. Microcephaly syndromes. Semin Pediatr Neurol 1. 2007; 14:118.
2. Firth HV, Hurst JA, Hall JG. Microcephaly. In: Oxford Desk Reference: Clinical
Genetics,1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005. p.172.
Lissencephaly – the six cortical layers do not form normally due to impaired migration of
neurons from the germinal matrix lining the ventricles. The surface of the brain appears
completely or partially smooth with loss or reduction of sulci. It may be caused by infection,
intrauterine perfusion failure, autosomal recessive inheritance, or de novo translocations and
deletions. Microcephaly develops in all patients with lissencephaly by the first year; a
minority is microcephalic at birth.
Hydranencephaly is vascular insult to the brain in which fluid-filled cavities replace the
cerebral hemispheres; cerebellum, midbrain, thalami, and basal ganglia are usually
preserved.
Yes No
Proportionate microcephaly
Yes Does the child have
neurological signs or
Do specific Is the microcephaly symptoms or a family history
testing for that proportionate with height of childhood neurological
condition and weight? disease
No
Yes
No
Obtain MRI for further evaluation
Does child have clinical features, other organ involvement, vision/hearing impairments,
or
family history to suggest a specific disease or syndrome?
Yes No