Analyzing some Riccati Equations.

Mathematical connections with some

Ramanujan parameters and various equations concerning some topics of the
String Theory and Swampland Conjecture. IX

Michele Nardelli1, Antonio Nardelli2

Abstract

In this research thesis (part IX), we analyze some Riccati Equations and the
mathematical connections with some Ramanujan parameters and various equations
concerning some topics of the String Theory and Swampland Conjecture.

1
M.Nardelli studied at Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II,
Largo S. Marcellino, 10 - 80138 Napoli, Dipartimento di Matematica ed Applicazioni “R. Caccioppoli” -
Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II” – Polo delle Scienze e delle Tecnologie Monte S. Angelo, Via
Cintia (Fuorigrotta), 80126 Napoli, Italy
2
A. Nardelli studies at the Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II - Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici –
Sezione Filosofia - scholar of Theoretical Philosophy
1
Jacopo Riccati
Mathematician

(1676 – 1754)

2
 Vesuvius landscape with gorse – Naples

https://www.pinterest.it/pin/95068242114589901/

We want to highlight that the development of the various equations was carried
out according an our possible logical and original interpretation

3
From:

On the Zeros of the Davenport Heilbronn Function

S. A. Gritsenko - Received May 15, 2016 - ISSN 0081-5438, Proceedings of the
Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 2017, Vol. 296, pp. 65–87.

We have:

( 10 − 2 5 − 2) ( 5 − 1) = 𝜅

Input:

Decimal approximation:

0.28407904384…. = κ

4
Alternate forms:

Minimal polynomial:

Expanded forms:

For ((((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))) = 8πG; G = 0.011303146014

Indeed:

((((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1))))/(8π)

Input:

5
Result:

Decimal approximation:

0.01130314…. = g (gravitational coupling constant)

Property:

Alternate forms:

6
Expanded forms:

Series representations:

We note that:

7
(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))*((2 i (sqrt(5) - 1) t + sqrt(5) - 1)/(2 (sqrt(2 (5 - sqrt(5))) -
2)))

Input:

Exact result:

Plot:

Alternate form assuming t>0:

8
Alternate forms:

1/2+it = real part of every nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function

Derivative:

Indefinite integral:

9
And again:

(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((2x)))*((2 i (sqrt(5) - 1) t + sqrt(5) - 1)/(2 (sqrt(2 (5 - sqrt(5))) - 2)))

= (1/2+it)

Input:

Exact result:

Alternate form assuming t and x are real:

Alternate form:

10
Alternate form assuming t and x are positive:

Expanded forms:

Solutions:

Input:

11
Decimal approximation:

1
0.6180339887…. =
𝜙

Solution for the variable x:

Implicit derivatives:

12
From:

Jacopo Riccati - Opere, vol. 1, In Lucca, Iacopo Giusti, 1761.

We consider:

a = 16, b = 32, c = 64, f = 64, g = 128, p = 256, q = 512, r = 2, s = 3,

t = 1 or 2, l = 8, A = M = 128 B = N = 256 S = T = 512

we have:

13
From:

[(c*a)/((2-c*a)*z-c*a*b) + (c*a*b)/((z*(2-c*a)*z-c*a*b))] dz

14
Indefinite integral:

Alternate forms of the integral:

Alternate form assuming a, b, c, and z are positive:

15
Series expansion of the integral at z = 0:

Series expansion of the integral at z = ∞:

From:

-(sqrt(16) sqrt(64) (sqrt(16) sqrt(64) log(16*32*64 + 16*64 z - 2 z) + sqrt(32)

sqrt(16*64 - 2) tan^(-1)((z sqrt(16*64 - 2))/(sqrt(16) sqrt(32) sqrt(64)))))/(16*64 - 2)

Input:

16
Exact result:

Plots: (can be related to the open strings)

Alternate forms:

17
Expanded form:

Series expansion at z = -16384/511:

Series expansion at z = 0:

18
Series expansion at z = -(128 i)/sqrt(511):

19
Series expansion at z = (128 i)/sqrt(511):

Series expansion at z = ∞:

20
Derivative:

Indefinite integral:

From:

-16/511 (32 log(1022 *11.3 + 32768) + 8 sqrt(511) tan^(-1)((sqrt(511) *11.3)/128))

Input:

21
Result:

-16.98419….

Alternative representations:

22
Series representations:

23
Integral representations:

24
Continued fraction representations:

25
-16/511 (32 log(1022 *119.8 + 32768) + 8 sqrt(511) tan^(-1)((sqrt(511)
*119.8)/128))

Input:

26
Result:

-20.60290….

Alternative representations:

27
Series representations:

28
Integral representations:

Continued fraction representations:

29
30
From the two previous expressions, after some calculations, we obtain:

31
-[golden ratio^2(((-16/511 (32 log(1022 *11.3 + 32768) + 8 sqrt(511) tan^(-
1)((sqrt(511) *11.3)/128))+(-20.60290))))+34+3/2(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))]

Input interpretation:

Result:

63.97817….≈ 64

Alternative representations:

32
Series representations:

33
34
35
Continued fraction representations:

36
37
38
(((-[golden ratio^2(((-16/511 (32 log(1022 *11.3 + 32768) + 8 sqrt(511) tan^(-
1)((sqrt(511) *11.3)/128))+(-20.60290))))+34+3/2(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))])))^2+e

Input interpretation:

Result:

4095.92….≈ 4096 = 642

Alternative representations:

39
40
Integral representations:

41
42
Continued fraction representations:

43
44
45
27(((-[golden ratio^2(((-16/511 (32 log(1022 *11.3 + 32768) + 8 sqrt(511) tan^(-
1)((sqrt(511) *11.3)/128))+(-20.60290))))+34+3/2(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))])))+Pi/2

Input interpretation:

Result:

1728.981…. This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball f0(1710) scalar
meson. Furthermore, 1728 occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an
elliptic curve. The number 1728 is one less than the Hardy–Ramanujan number 1729
(taxicab number)

46
Alternative representations:

47
Series representations:

48
49
50
Integral representations:

51
52
Continued fraction representations:

53
54
55
((27(((-[golden ratio^2(((-16/511 (32 log(1022 *11.3 + 32768) + 8 sqrt(511) tan^(-
1)((sqrt(511) *11.3)/128))+(-20.60290))))+34+3/2(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-
1)))])))+Pi/2))^1/15

Input interpretation:

Result:

𝜋2
1.6438140461….≈ ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6

We consider:

a = 16, b = 32, c = 64, f = 64, g = 128, p = 256, q = 512, r = 2, s = 3,

t = 1 or 2, l = 8, A = M = 128 B = N = 256 S = T = 512

From:

(-2*64-y)/(4*512) + sqrt((2*64+y)^2/(16*512^2)-32/(2*512))
56
Input:

Exact result:

Plots: (can be related to the open strings)

Alternate forms:

57
Expanded forms:

Roots:

Properties as a real function:

Domain

Range

Injectivity

58
Series expansion at y = 0:

Series expansion at y = 128 (-1 - 2 sqrt(2)):

Series expansion at y = 128 (2 sqrt(2) - 1):

Series expansion at y = ∞:

59
Derivative:

Indefinite integral:

Global minimum:

Limit:

60
Series representations:

From:

For y = 436.8 :

61
(-128 - 436.8)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 436.8)^2/4194304)

Input:

Result:

-0.0641086….

For y = 3825 :

(-128 - 3825)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 3825)^2/4194304)

Input:

Result:

Decimal approximation:

-0.00811216458….

Alternate form:

62
Minimal polynomial:

From the ratio between the two expressions, after some calculations, we obtain:

8(((-128 - 436.8)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 436.8)^2/4194304))) / ((((-128 -

3825)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 3825)^2/4194304))))+3(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))

Input:

Result:

64.0745….≈ 64

(((8(((-128 - 436.8)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 436.8)^2/4194304))) / ((((-128 -

3825)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 3825)^2/4194304))))+3(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-
1))))))^2-Pi^2+(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-1)))

Input:

Result:

4095.95….≈ 4096 = 642

63
27((8(((-128 - 436.8)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 436.8)^2/4194304))) / ((((-128 -
3825)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 3825)^2/4194304))))+3(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-
1)))))-1

Input:

Result:

1729.01…. This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball f0(1710) scalar
meson. Furthermore, 1728 occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an
elliptic curve. The number 1728 is one less than the Hardy–Ramanujan number 1729
(taxicab number)

[27((8(((-128 - 436.8)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 436.8)^2/4194304))) / ((((-128 -

3825)/2048 + sqrt(-1/32 + (128 + 3825)^2/4194304))))+3(((√(10-2√5) -2))⁄((√5-
1)))))-1]^1/15

Input:

Result:

𝜋2
1.64381588219132…..≈ ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6

64
From:

On String Vacua without Supersymmetry - BRANE DYNAMICS, BUBBLES

AND HOLOGRAPHY - Candidato: Ivano BASILE - Relatore: Prof. Augusto
SAGNOTTI - arXiv:2010.00628v2 [hep-th] 31 Dec 2020

We have that:

For:

L>0; L=2

(sqrt(5/3))*1/2

Input:

Result:

Decimal approximation:

0.64549722436….
65
Alternate form:

From which:

1+(sqrt(5/3))*1/2

Input:

Result:

Decimal approximation:

𝜋2
1.64549722436….≈ ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6

Alternate forms:

Minimal polynomial:

66
From:

(Sqrt(5/3-1))/2 = 10^-((x(1+8/5))/((8-1)x-1))

Input:

Exact result:

Plot:

Alternate form:

67
Alternate form assuming x is real:

Solution:

Real solution:

Solution:

(5 log(6))/(35 log(3) - 26 log(5) + log(512))

Input:

68
Decimal approximation:

γ = 3.14966072614

Alternate forms:

Alternative representations:

69
Series representations:

70
Integral representations:

From:

(-5(5+1))/(2*2^2)

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal form:

Λ = -3.75

71
From:

(2(5+1))/(10-2)-1/2

Input:

Exact result:

σ=1

For:

σ =1

p = 5 ; n = 10 and q = 535.49165 ; s = 1/2 ; ρ = -20

From:

-1-23/12*0.5+(3/2+0.5) ln(1+0.5/2) + (1+0.5)^(1.5) sqrt(2/0.5)

atanh(sqrt(0.5/(2(1+0.5))))

72
Input:

Result:

0.0807615 = L(s)

2^2*5(((-1-23/12*0.5+(3/2+0.5) ln(1+0.5/2) + (1+0.5)^(1.5) sqrt(2/0.5)

atanh(sqrt(0.5/(2(1+0.5)))))))

Input:

Result:

1.61523…. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the golden ratio
1.618033988749...

73
Alternative representations:

74
Series representations:

75
76
Integral representations:

For

G = 7*10^-11

77
From:

2^7 * 4 * 2.40375*10^-7 (-20/2)

Input interpretation:

Result:

-0.00123072

From:

-0.00123072/(16Pi*7*10^-11) * integrate[10*e^(-0.9991104684)*((((-3.75-
(0.9991104684^2)/100+1/100+8/(3Pi)*7*10^-11*(-3.75)* 0.0807615*(1/(100*(-
3.75))))))dt

Input interpretation:

78
Result:

Plot:

Alternate form assuming t is real:

Indefinite integral assuming all variables are real:

2((sqrt(4.82961×10^6)-144-5-3/5))

Input interpretation:

Result:

4096.07….≈ 4096 = 642

79
27((2((sqrt(4.82961×10^6)-144-5-3/5))))^0.5+1

Input interpretation:

Result:

1729.02… This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball f0(1710) scalar
meson. Furthermore, 1728 occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an
elliptic curve. The number 1728 is one less than the Hardy–Ramanujan number 1729
(taxicab number)

(((27((2((sqrt(4.82961×10^6)-144-5-3/5))))^0.5+1)))^1/15

Input interpretation:

Result:

𝜋2
1.643816….≈ ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6

We have also:

(((0.0807615 (4.82961×10^6))))/96+34-((zeta(2)-1)^1/32)

Input interpretation:

80
Result:

4096 = 642

27sqrt[(((0.0807615 (4.82961×10^6))))/96+34-((zeta(2)-1)^1/32)]+1

Input interpretation:

Result:

1729

This result is very near to the mass of candidate glueball f0(1710) scalar meson.
Furthermore, 1728 occurs in the algebraic formula for the j-invariant of an elliptic
curve. The number 1728 is one less than the Hardy–Ramanujan number 1729
(taxicab number)

(((27sqrt[(((0.0807615 (4.82961×10^6))))/96+34-((zeta(2)-1)^1/32)]+1)))^1/15

Input interpretation:

Result:

𝜋2
1.643815….≈ ζ(2) = = 1.644934 …
6

81
Observations

We note that, from the number 8, we obtain as follows:

We notice how from the numbers 8 and 2 we get 64, 1024, 4096 and 8192, and that 8
is the fundamental number. In fact 82 = 64, 83 = 512, 84 = 4096. We define it
"fundamental number", since 8 is a Fibonacci number, which by rule, divided by the
previous one, which is 5, gives 1.6 , a value that tends to the golden ratio, as for all
numbers in the Fibonacci sequence

82
“Golden” Range

Finally we note how 82 = 64, multiplied by 27, to which we add 1, is equal to 1729,
the so-called "Hardy-Ramanujan number". Then taking the 15th root of 1729, we
obtain a value close to ζ(2) that 1.6438 ..., which, in turn, is included in the range of
what we call "golden numbers"

Furthermore for all the results very near to 1728 or 1729, adding 64 = 8 2, one obtain
values about equal to 1792 or 1793. These are values almost equal to the Planck
multipole spectrum frequency 1792.35 and to the hypothetical Gluino mass

83
Mathematical connections with some sectors of String Theory

From:

Modular equations and approximations to 𝝅 - Srinivasa Ramanujan

Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, XLV, 1914, 350 – 372

We have that:

84
From:

An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking

J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti - arXiv:1711.11494v1 [hep-th] 30 Nov 2017

From the following vacuum equations:

we have obtained, from the results almost equals of the equations, putting

instead of

a new possible mathematical connection between the two exponentials. Thence, also
the values concerning p, C, βE and 𝜙 correspond to the exponents of e (i.e. of exp).
Thence we obtain for p = 5 and βE = 1/2:

𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 4096𝑒 −𝜋 18

Therefore, with respect to the exponentials of the vacuum equations, the Ramanujan’s
exponential has a coefficient of 4096 which is equal to 642, while -6C+𝜙 is equal to -
𝜋 18. From this it follows that it is possible to establish mathematically, the dilaton
value.

For
85
exp((-Pi*sqrt(18)) we obtain:

Input:

Exact result:

Decimal approximation:

1.6272016… * 10-6

Property:

Series representations:

Now, we have the following calculations:

𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 4096𝑒 −𝜋 18

𝑒 −𝜋 18
= 1.6272016… * 10^-6
86
from which:
1
𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 1.6272016… * 10^-6
4096

0.000244140625 𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 𝑒 −𝜋 18
= 1.6272016… * 10^-6

Now:
ln 𝑒 −𝜋 18
= −13.328648814475 = −𝜋 18

And:

(1.6272016* 10^-6) *1/ (0.000244140625)

Input interpretation:

Result:

0.006665017...

Thence:

0.000244140625 𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 𝑒 −𝜋 18

Dividing both sides by 0.000244140625, we obtain:

0.000244140625 1
𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 𝑒 −𝜋 18
0.000244140625 0.000244140625

87
 𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 0.0066650177536

((((exp((-Pi*sqrt(18)))))))*1/0.000244140625

Input interpretation:

Result:

0.00666501785…

Series representations:

Now:

88
 𝑒 −6𝐶+𝜙 = 0.0066650177536

= 0.00666501785…

From:

ln(0.00666501784619)

Input interpretation:

Result:

-5.010882647757…

Alternative representations:

Series representations:

89
Integral representation:

In conclusion:

−6𝐶 + 𝜙 = −5.010882647757 …

and for C = 1, we obtain:

𝜙 = −5.010882647757 + 6 = 𝟎. 𝟗𝟖𝟗𝟏𝟏𝟕𝟑𝟓𝟐𝟐𝟒𝟑 = 𝝓

Note that the values of ns (spectral index) 0.965, of the average of the Omega mesons
Regge slope 0.987428571 and of the dilaton 0.989117352243, are also connected to
the following two Rogers-Ramanujan continued fractions:

90
(http://www.bitman.name/math/article/102/109/)

The mean between the two results of the above Rogers-Ramanujan continued
fractions is 0.97798855285, value very near to the ψ Regge slope 0.979:

Also performing the 512th root of the inverse value of the Pion meson rest mass
139.57, we obtain:

((1/(139.57)))^1/512

Input interpretation:

Result:

0.99040073.... result very near to the dilaton value 𝟎. 𝟗𝟖𝟗𝟏𝟏𝟕𝟑𝟓𝟐𝟐𝟒𝟑 = 𝝓 and to

the value of the following Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction:

91
From

AdS Vacua from Dilaton Tadpoles and Form Fluxes - J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti
- arXiv:1612.08566v2 [hep-th] 22 Feb 2017 - March 27, 2018

We have:

For

ξ=1

we obtain:

(2*e^(0.989117352243/2)) / (1+sqrt(((1-1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))))

Input interpretation:

92
Result:

Polar coordinates:

1.65919106525….. result very near to the 14th root of the following Ramanujan’s
3
class invariant 𝑄 = 𝐺505 /𝐺101/5 = 1164.2696 i.e. 1.65578...

Series representations:

From

93
We obtain:

e^(4*0.989117352243) / (((1+sqrt(1-1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))))^7
[42(1+sqrt(1-
1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))+5*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)]

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

54.76072411…..

Series representations:

94
95
From which:

e^(4*0.989117352243) / (((1+sqrt(1-1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))))^7
[42(1+sqrt(1-
1/3*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)))+5*16/(Pi)^2*e^(2*0.989117352243)]*1/34

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

96
1.610609533…. result that is a good approximation to the value of the golden ratio
1.618033988749...

Series representations:

97
Now, we have:

For:

ξ=1

𝜙 = 0.989117352243

98
From

we obtain:

((2*e^(-0.989117352243/2))) /
((((1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))))))

Input interpretation:

Result:

0.382082347529….

Series representations:

99
From which:

1+1/(((4((2*e^(-0.989117352243/2))) /
((((1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243)))))))))))

Input interpretation:

Result:

1.6543092….. We note that, the result 1.6543092... is very near to the 14th root of the
3
following Ramanujan’s class invariant 𝑄 = 𝐺505 /𝐺101/5 = 1164.2696 i.e.
1.65578...

Indeed:

100
 3
14
113+5 505 105+5 505
+ = 1,65578 …
8 8

Series representations:

101
And from

we obtain:

e^(-4*0.989117352243) / [1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243)))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243)))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243)]

Input interpretation:

102
Result:

-0.034547055658…

Series representations:

103
From which:

47 *1/(((-1/(((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))))))
104
Input interpretation:

Result:

1.6237116159…. result that is an approximation to the value of the golden ratio

1.618033988749...

Series representations:

105
106
And again:

32((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))

Input interpretation:

Result:

-1.1055057810….

We note that the result -1.1055057810…. is very near to the value of Cosmological
Constant, less 10-52 , thence 1.1056, with minus sign

107
Series representations:

108
109
And:

-[32((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))]^5

Input interpretation:

Result:

1.651220569…. result very near to the 14th root of the following Ramanujan’s class
3
invariant 𝑄 = 𝐺505 /𝐺101/5 = 1164.2696 i.e. 1.65578...

110
Series representations:

111
112
We obtain also:

-[32((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))]^1/2

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

1.05143035007

113
Series representations:

114
115
1 / -[32((((e^(-4*0.989117352243) /
[1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))]^7 *
[42(1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))-
13*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))]))))]^1/2

Input interpretation:

Result:

Polar coordinates:

0.95108534763

We know that the primordial fluctuations are consistent with Gaussian purely
adiabatic scalar perturbations characterized by a power spectrum with a spectral
index ns = 0.965 ± 0.004, consistent with the predictions of slow-roll, single-field,
inflation.

Thence 0.95108534763 is a result very near to the spectral index ns , to the mesonic
Regge slope, to the inflaton value at the end of the inflation 0.9402 and to the value
of the following Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction:

116
Series representations:

117
118
From the previous expression

= -0.034547055658…

we have also:

119
1+1/(((4((2*e^(-0.989117352243/2))) /
((((1+sqrt(((1+1/3*(4Pi^2)/25*e^(2*0.989117352243))))))))))) + (-0.034547055658)

Input interpretation:

Result:

1.61976215705….. result that is a very good approximation to the value of the golden
ratio 1.618033988749...

Series representations:

120
121
Appendix

From: A. Sagnotti – AstronomiAmo, 23.04.2020

In the above figure, it is said that: “why a given shape of the extra dimensions?
Crucial, it determines the predictions for α”.

We propose that whatever shape the compactified dimensions are, their geometry
must be based on the values of the golden ratio and ζ(2), (the latter connected to 1728
or 1729, whose fifteenth root provides an excellent approximation to the above
mentioned value) which are recurrent as solutions of the equations that we are going
to develop. It is important to specify that the initial conditions are always values
belonging to a fundamental chapter of the work of S. Ramanujan "Modular equations
and Appoximations to Pi" (see references). These values are some multiples of 8 (64
and 4096), 276, which added to 4096, is equal to 4372, and finally eπ√22

122
Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Professor Augusto Sagnotti theoretical physicist at Scuola

Normale Superiore (Pisa – Italy) for his very useful explanations and his availability

123
References

On the Zeros of the Davenport Heilbronn Function

S. A. Gritsenko - Received May 15, 2016 - ISSN 0081-5438, Proceedings of the
Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 2017, Vol. 296, pp. 65–87.

Jacopo Riccati - Opere, vol. 1, In Lucca, Iacopo Giusti, 1761.

On String Vacua without Supersymmetry - BRANE DYNAMICS, BUBBLES

AND HOLOGRAPHY - Candidato: Ivano BASILE - Relatore: Prof. Augusto
SAGNOTTI - arXiv:2010.00628v2 [hep-th] 31 Dec 2020

Modular equations and approximations to 𝝅 - Srinivasa Ramanujan

Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, XLV, 1914, 350 – 372

An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking

J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti - arXiv:1711.11494v1 [hep-th] 30 Nov 2017

March 27, 2018

AdS Vacua from Dilaton Tadpoles and Form Fluxes
J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti - arXiv:1612.08566v2 [hep-th] 22 Feb 2017

124