Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DESIGN
Why do we Why do we
1- Define events or clinical cases
2-Count these events
teach you teach you
3-Describe cases by person, place and time to
determine the population at riskepidemiologic
study design? 5-Calculate rate of occurrences for these event among
exposed and non-exposed
study design?
6-Compare to identify differences in rates of occurrence
7-Draw inferences about the events that define the
health problem and agent or agents that cause it
8. Propose control measures and assess control
measures.
Figure 1.
Epidemiologic study
designs and
increasing strength
of evidence
OBJECTIVES:
To compare the effectiveness of lumbar instrumented fusion
with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with
chronic low back pain and disc degeneration.
BACKGROUND:
Acne vulgaris is a common inflammatory disorder of the
skin that involves pilosebaceous units. This study was
conducted to compare the efficacy of oral azithromycin with
oral doxycycline in the treatment of acne vulgaris in our
population.
1. Case report
2. Case series
4. Descriptive longitudinal
This study estimated the prevalence of modern contraceptive use (MCU) and
the sociodemographic factors associated with MCU among sexually active
men in Ghana. A survey of a representative sample of 3,373 sexually active
men in Ghana. Question was: what were the personal characteristics of the
men who use modern contraceptive methods in term of their education, age,
knowledge about contraceptive methods, knowledge of service delivery points,
how many children they have, etc.
4rth Year Medical Students - Class 2019/20
Another descriptive study example
Increasing trend of prevalence of infertility in Beijing.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Beijing in 2012. A
stratified cluster sampling method was used to select 12 448 couples of
whom the female partners were born between 1955 and 1985. All subjects
were interviewed face to face. Infertility was defined as the failure to
achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months of regular unprotected sexual
intercourse. Results: The prevalence of infertility was 4.2% (3.1% as
primary and 1.1% as secondary infertility). An increase in the prevalence
of infertility according to the age of the female partner was found:
1.3% infertility for married females born in the 1950s and 11.4% for married
females born in the 1980s.
Exposed Disease
Design of a case present/not
cohort study
Disease
Not present/not
Exposed
Advantages of cohort study design
It permits the direct estimation of the rate of health problem and the relative
risk associated with the exposure of interest. It also provides estimates of the
attributable risk, thus indicating the absolute magnitude of the disease
attributable to a risk factor.
Calculate disease occurrence i.e. incidence rate.
It provides a clear temporal sequence of exposure and disease, because the
presence or absence of risk factor is recorded before disease occurrence.
(antecedent consequent relationship)
It provides excellent opportunity to study rare exposures.
It permits the assessment of multiple outcomes (risk and benefits) that may be
related to a specific measure. It permits discovering other diseases related to
the same risk factor.
Less chance for bias4rth Year Medical Students - Class 2019/20
Disadvantages of cohort study design
Not suitable for rare diseases where large numbers of subjects are required.
Long-term follow up may be necessary when the latency period for the
outcome of interest is long.
The most serious problem is attrition or loss of people from the sample during
the course of the study. This may affect the study .results There may be attrition
among the investigators.
It is expensive and time consuming
The exposure status, which is present at enrollment into the study, may change
during the conduct of the study. Over long period many environmental,
individual or intervention changes may occur and confuse the issue of
association.
4rth Year Medical Students - Class 2019/20
Case-control study designs
When selection is based on current disease status
rather than exposure, the epidemiologist collects
information on exposure history from diseased
(cases) and non-diseased study subjects (controls).
This design is called case-control, or retrospective,
or case-referent study.
For a randomized clinical trial or a cohort study is the ratio of the risk
of developing the disease in the exposed group relative to the risk
in the unexposed group.