Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook of Surgery
Edited by Joe J. Tjandra, Gordon J.A. Clunie, Andrew H. Kaye & Julian A. Smith
© 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
79 Post-traumatic confusion
John David Laidlaw
Investigation
Investigation is dictated by the clinical history and
Aetiology and pathogenesis examination findings. However, most cases of post-
traumatic confusion require the following (Box 79.2):
r CT scan brain (urgent if GCS drop >2, or focal neu-
Relatively minor head trauma is not infrequently over-
looked in cases where there are significant other in- rological signs)
r Arterial blood gas analysis (Pao2 , Paco2 , Bicarbon-
juries. Although minor head injuries in themselves do
not typically cause significant confusion, the effects ate, pH, base excess). Note that any patient with con-
of secondary brain injury in the post-traumatic pe- fusion must be suspected of having disturbances in
riod can rapidly develop into a relatively dangerous respiratory function, and this must be excluded with
condition which often has confusion as its present- arterial blood gas analysis. Skin oxygen saturation
ing symptom. Therefore, any post-traumatic confu- monitoring (pulse-oximetry) is a useful adjunct to
sion warrants specific clinical assessment and investi- monitor trends in patients with known ventilatory
gation to rule out potentially dangerous intracranial parameters, but is not an alternative to initial ABG
pathology. analysis.
r Full blood examination (haemoglobin, RCC, WCC,
However, it must be stressed that the exclusion of sig-
nificant intracranial pathology is, in itself, insufficient platelets)
r Urea and electrolytes
investigation in a patient with post-traumatic confu-
r Calcium/phosphate
sion. Respiratory problems, metabolic derangements,
r Consideration of septic work-up (if indicated clin-
infections and drugs can all be significant and poten-
tially dangerous causes of post-traumatic confusion, ically, and which may include wound swabs, blood
and must be recognized and appropriately managed cultures, urine analysis and culture, chest X-ray, lum-
(Box 79.1). bar puncture for CSF analysis).
671
BLUK017-Tjandra September 12, 2005 21:43
Vasogenic ◦ Non-medicinal
Cytotoxic Alcohol
Hyponatraemia Narcotic
◦ Infection Hallucinogens
Meningitis Cocaine
Best eye
Score opening (E) Best verbal (V) Best motor (M)
6 Obeys
5 Orientated Localizes pain
4 Spontaneous Confused Withdraws to pain
3 To speech Inappropriate words Abnormal flexion to pain (‘decorticate’)
2 To pain Incomprehensible sounds Extension to pain (‘decerebrate’)
1 None None None
Notes on GCS:
• GCS = E + V + M.
• Worst score is 3, best is 15.
• Use best response if differences between sides for eye opening or motor function.
• GCS measures only conscious state, not neurological deficit.
urine analysis and culture, chest X-ray, ± CSF Note spinal precautions for all intubations, but
General management of confused patient have the side effects of altering conscious state, causing
pupillary constriction and depressing ventilation, all of
Environmental
which are potentially catastrophic in a patient with a
Confused patients are generally best managed in a quiet significant intracranial pathology. They have therefore
environment, but need to be closely monitored by ex- historically been shunned by neurosurgeons. However,
perienced nursing and medical staff. Agitated patients most modern neurosurgeons and traumatologists rec-
need to be protected from falls, etc., and bedsides are ognize the effective analgesic properties and the short
therefore essential. Padding to the bedsides, or even and predictable action of narcotics when used by the
nursing on the floor on a thick mattress may provide i.v. route, and are prepared to use them cautiously. It
more protection. On occasions physical restraints may must be stressed that only small, frequent i.v. doses
be needed to protect the patient; however these must be (e.g. 1–2 mg morphine p.r.n.) should be used and these
checked regularly to ensure they do not cause pressure must be titrated carefully, with the patient closely super-
or pain or subject the patient to a risk for entanglement. vised. Intramuscular doses have a more unpredictable
It is essential that restraints are not used as a means to and delayed action and should be avoided. The his-
avoid close supervision; all confused patients need such torical anachronism of using codeine instead of nar-
supervision and those requiring restraint should be su- cotics should be discarded; codeine is a narcotic with
pervised even more diligently. the same side effects as other narcotics when used in
Familiar faces, such as family or close friends, may the same analgesic dose, but has the disadvantage of
help relax a confused patient, although visitors and un- not being available in i.v. preparation. A note should
familiar contacts should be kept to a minimum. Busy be made that tramadol, which has recently been used
wards and noisy areas will often cause a confused pa- increasingly in the management of severe pain, does
tient to become quite agitated and are best avoided if increase the risk of seizures, and therefore is probably
possible. best avoided following head injury.
Sedation
Legal competency
Sedation is best avoided in confused patients if at all
A confused patient is not competent to make appro-
possible. The aim is to identify and treat the cause of the
priate important decisions. This of course includes giv-
confusion rather than sedate the patient. Sedation may
ing consent for surgical procedures, and most coun-
rarely be needed in an agitated patient where there is the
tries have legal avenues which allow the clinician to
risk of self-harm or injury. However, very often close su-
undertake emergency medical procedures without con-
pervision in a calm environment will allow sedation to
sent. It must also be understood that a confused patient
be avoided. Sedation should only be used if significant
cannot competently discharge himself or herself from
intracranial and metabolic (particularly hypoxic) prob-
hospital against medical advice. The clinician must un-
lems have been excluded. Sedation should never be used
derstand that the refusal of a confused patient to follow
simply to facilitate easier nursing care. On the few occa-
the clinician’s advice is not done from a position of le-
sions where sedation is needed it is most appropriate to
gal competency, and therefore the clinician maintains
use only short-acting parenteral (i.v.) sedatives in small
significant responsibility for consequences of these ac-
doses titrated to effect. The clinician must constantly
tions. On occasions, formal declaration of incompe-
be aware of the potential for wrongly attributing
tency is required to allow appropriate care or restraint.
decreased conscious state to sedative use, and missing
However, in most cases even very confused patients can
a worsening and dangerous intracranial pathology or
be quietly reasoned with and will follow gentle calm
metabolic event.
advice, particularly if people familiar to them are in-
volved.
Analgesia
Many patients with post-traumatic confusion have sig-
Specific management of the cause of confusion
nificant pain from other injuries. The pain often causes
severe agitation, and the patient can be much better The primary rule in management of a confused patient
managed if appropriate analgesia is used. Narcotics is to correct the primary cause of the confusion.
BLUK017-Tjandra September 12, 2005 21:43