Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Published By:
Retrieval Number: F8760038620/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI:10.35940/ijrte.F8760.038620 3368 & Sciences Publication
User’s Perspective About Mobile Fitness Applications
Published By:
Retrieval Number: F8760038620/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI:10.35940/ijrte.F8760.038620 3369 & Sciences Publication
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)
ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-8 Issue-6, March 2020
Published By:
Retrieval Number: F8760038620/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI:10.35940/ijrte.F8760.038620 3370 & Sciences Publication
User’s Perspective About Mobile Fitness Applications
The other constituents are easy to engage (26%), higher Table no: 7.15 Alternatives Apps provide compared to
privacy (24%) and cheaper than gym (22%). Fitness Centers
Number of
Table no:7.11 Effectiveness of App Used Percentage
Respondent
Personal Advice 12 24.0
Number of Percentage
Respondent (%) Exercise Guidance 23 46.0
More Effective 9 18 Looking for more
7 14.0
Effective 30 60 professionals
Neutral 9 18 Others 8 16.0
Slightly Effective 2 4 Total 50 100.0
Total 50 100 Source: Primary Data
Source: Primary Data The above table shows additional features apps provide
The table indicates 60% of total respondents find fitness app when compared to fitness centers. Of the total respondents,
effective, followed by an equal percentage (18%) finding it majority (46%) agree that fitness apps provide adequate
more effective and neutral and 4% finds it being slightly exercise guidance than fitness centers. The other categories
effective. of features are personal advice (24%), others (16%) and
Table no:7.12 Main Training Program for Fitness looking for more professionals (14%).
Number of Percentage
Respondent (%) Table no:7.16 Are Fitness Apps cheaper than Fitness
Centers
Dieting 5 10 Number of
Percentage
Aerobic Training 12 24 Respondent
Cardio Exercise(Yoga, Zumba) 13 26 Strongly Agree 20 40.0
Workouts & Calorie Counting 20 40 Agree 20 40.0
Total 50 100 Neutral 9 18.0
Source: Primary Data Disagree 1 2.0
The table depicts respondents’ main training program for Total 50 100.0
fitness. It can be seen that 40% of the total respondents Source: Primary Data
prefer workouts & calorie counting. The other segments are The above table indicates an equal percentage of the
cardio exercise program (26%), aerobic training (24%) and respondents(40%) strongly agree and agree the fitness apps
dieting (10%). are cheaper than fitness centers, followed by 18% feeling it
neutral and 2% disagreeing to fitness apps being cheaper
Table no: 7.13 How App help in achieving than fitness centers.
Fitness Goal?
Number of Percentage Table no: 7.17 Negative Impact on Health after App
Respondent (%) Usage
Convenience of Access 26 52
Personalization 11 22 Number of Percentage
Greater Privacy 6 12 Respondent
Easy to Engage 7 14
Yes 15 30
Total 50 100
No 35 70
Source: Primary Data Total 50 100
The table shows ways in which apps help the respondents in Source: Primary Data
achieving their fitness goal. It is evident that majority of the From the above table, it is evident 70% of the total
respondents (52%) agree that convenience of access being a respondents did not have any bad impact on their health
factor which helps them to achieve fitness goal. The other after the usage of fitness apps while 30% had a negative
segments are personalization (22%), easy to engage (14%) impact through the use of these apps.
and greater privacy (12%).
Table no:7.18 Referring apps to others
Table no:7.14 Time saving through Use of Fitness Number of
Percentage
Apps Respondent
Number of Percentage Yes 36 72.0
Respondent (%) No 14 28.0
Strongly Agree 14 28 Total 50 100.0
Agree 26 52 Source: Primary Data
Neutral 10 20 The table indicates majority (72%) are interested in referring
Total 50 100 the app to others and only 28% prefer not to refer the app to
Source: Primary Data others.
The above table depicts whether fitness app usage helps in
saving time of the respondents. Out of the total respondents,
it can be seen that 52% agree to it in saving time, 28%
strongly agree and 20% feeling it neutral.
Published By:
Retrieval Number: F8760038620/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI:10.35940/ijrte.F8760.038620 3371 & Sciences Publication
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)
ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-8 Issue-6, March 2020
VIII. FINDINGS But theses fitness apps suffer from many drawbacks which
could hinder its growth. Providing timely updates is one of
From the study, we found that majority of the respondents
the major problems among most of the apps. Another
who use fitness apps are young adult males in the age group
problem is the advertisements which pop up while doing the
of 20-35. It shows that men are more interested in remaining
workout videos. The developers should consider revising the
fit as compared to women.
features of apps to enable users adapt easily to the workout
About 30 percent respondents prefer apps with focus on
programs and videos provided in the apps. They should
workouts than diet and nutrition as an important aspect to
focus more on the users’ preferences by conducting a survey
fitness.
to get feedback from its users. Also the developers should
Even though half of the respondents like to remain fit
focus on improving the apps to adjust to different exercise
always, only 32 percent follow all the instructions of the app
behaviors of the participants.
frequently and always.
It is found that it has been only 3 months since 34 percent of Limitations
the respondents have started using these apps. This shows There are several limitations in conducting this research.
the popularity of fitness apps have increased in recent times. Some of them have a considerable effect on the study while
About 40 percent of the respondents use the app on a daily others do not have much effect. The significant limitations
basis and 28 percent use it on weekly basis to do their are as follows:
fitness activities. And 60 percent respondents find the app l. Sample Size: The number of participants in the study is
that they are using effective. This indicates the influence of limited as the fitness apps have not become popular among
the app on users. people and also the study covers only a limited geographical
Most of the respondents find convenience of access of apps area.
as the main cause for choosing the app initially and also for 2. Unexplored area of research study: There are only a
achieving their fitness goal. limited number of research studies done on this field. Many
The analysis shows that majority of the respondents agree to articles are available related to this topic but they are not
apps being cheaper than fitness centers and helps in saving able to provide a direct relationship with this research.
their time.
The study shows that about 46 percent of respondents agree REFERENCE
that apps provide ample exercise guidance at low cost than
fitness centers. 1. Adria Muntaner-Mas, Antonio Martinez-Nicolas, Carl J. Lavie,
Steven N. Blair, Robert Ross, Ross Arena, and Francisco B. Ortega
Almost 70 percent respondents did not have any negative (2019). A Systematic Review of Fitness Apps and Their Potential
impact on their health after using the app and would like to Clinical and Sports Utility for Objective and Remote Assessment of
refer the app to others. Cardiorespiratory Fitness. Sports Medicine 2019, 49(4), 587-600.
doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01084-y
2. Brad Millington (2014). Smartphone Apps and the Mobile
IX. SUGGESTIONS Privatization of Health and Fitness. Critical Studies in Media
Communication, 31(5), 479-493. doi:10.1080/15295036.2014.973429
More awareness programs have to be conducted to increase 3. H. Erin Lee and Jaehee Cho (2017). What Motivates Users to
the usage of these apps. Continue Using Diet and Fitness Apps? Application of the Uses and
Advertisements through various social media platforms Gratifications Approach. Health Communication, 32(12), 1445-1453.
should be made to increase the popularity of the apps. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1167998
4. Juliana Chen, Janet E. Cade, and Margaret Allman-Farinelli (2015).
Motivating the users by giving daily notifications on success The Most Popular Smartphone Apps for Weight Loss: A Quality
stories or fitness quotes can increase the continual use of the Assessment. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2015, 3(4):e104.
apps. Providing the apps free of cost or low-priced can doi:10.2196/mhealth.4334
increase its users. Regular updates have to be made to 5. Joshua H. West, P. Cougar Hall, Carl L. Hanson, Michael D. Barnes,
Christophe Giraud-Carrier, James Barrett (2012). There’s an App for
workouts to increase the efficiency of its usage. That: Content Analysis of Paid Health and Fitness Apps. J Med
Providing exercise guidance along with videos is another Internet Res 2012, 14(3):e72.doi:10.2196/jmir.1977
way to enhance its efficiency. Enhancing the flexibility of 6. Lynn Katherine Herrmann and Jinsook Kim (2017). The Fitness of
apps with regard to automatic tracking of activity and well apps: a theory-based examination of mobile fitness app usage over 5
months. Mhealth 2017, 3(2). doi:10.21037/mhealth.2017.01.03
defined features. 7. Maria D. Molina, and S. Shyam Sundar (2020). Can Mobile Apps
Motivate Fitness Tracking? A Study of Technological Affordances
X. CONCLUSION and Workout Behaviors. Health Communication, 35(1), 65-74.
doi:10.1080/10410236.2018.1536961
The study addresses on the users outlook towards the 8. Paulina Bondaronek, Ghadah Alkhaldi, April Slee, Fiona L.
smartphone fitness apps and its influence in promoting Hamilton, and Elizabeth Murray (2018). Quality of Publicly
Available Physical Activity Apps: Review and Content Analysis.
health. After conducting the study, it is seen that most of the JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018, 6(3):e53. doi:10.2196/mhealth.9069
respondents consider that using fitness apps is worthwhile. 9. Steven S. Coughlin, Mary Whitehead, Joyce Q. Sheats, Jeff
Fitness has become a craze among youngsters and adults. Mastromonico, and Selina Smith (2016). A Review of Smartphone
This is evident from the study as the majority of the app Applications for Promoting Physical Activity. Jacobs J Community
Med. 2016, 2(1).
users are young adults. Most participants agree that the 10. www.skyhook.com
fitness apps are highly effective in providing facilities to 11. www.hackernoon.com
attain their fitness goals with less cost, time and easy 12. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
accessibility. The apps seem to have greater positive impact 13. http://rubygarage.org
14. www.jmirpublications.com
on the users’ health when it is used regularly. This positive 15. www.ispo.com
result also enhanced the popularity of apps as the satisfied
users suggest the apps to others.
Published By:
Retrieval Number: F8760038620/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI:10.35940/ijrte.F8760.038620 3372 & Sciences Publication
User’s Perspective About Mobile Fitness Applications
AUTHORS PROFILE
Published By:
Retrieval Number: F8760038620/2020©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI:10.35940/ijrte.F8760.038620 3373 & Sciences Publication