Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Also, GTP-binding proteins might in- rials used for the in vitro system were described (7, affinity-purified antibodies and '251-labeled protein
crease accuracy of protein sorting. Coupling 13). A (27).
25. Protease protection experiment (Fig. 2, C and D): 26. U. K. Laemmli, Nature 227, 680 (1970).
GTP hydrolysis with vesicle fusion might Intermediate was isolated after incubation of a 27. W. N. Burnette, Anal. Biochem. 112, 195 (1981).
serve as a proofreading mechanism (7), sim- transport reaction in the presence of anti-Yptl (as 28. I thank A. Adams, N. Hay and C. Palfrey for helpful
ilar to that proposed for elongation factor described in Fig. 1). The samples were then treated discussions and R. Wright for the antiserum to
with trypsin (50 ag/ml) for 1 hour at 40C in the HMG1, L. Westehube and M. Rexach for advice, G.
Tu in protein translation (23). presence or absence of detergent (Triton X-100, Jedd for assistance, and R. Miller, F. Tamanoi, A.
0.1%). The protease reaction was terminated by Adams, and N. Hay for reading the manuscript.
the addition of trypsin inhibitor (100 gg/ml). SDS Supported by grants from the Cancer Research
REFERENCES AND NOTES gel electrophoresis (11%) and Laemmli buffer Foundation, the Louis Block Fund and the Sprague
system (26) were used for all protein electropho- Foundation.
1. G. Palade, Science 189, 347 (1975). resis. Proteins were electroblotted to nitrocellulose
2. S. R. Pfeffer and J. E. Rothman, Annu. Rev. Bio- and radiographic detection was performed with 19 December 1990; accepted 27 March 1991
chem. 56, 829 (1987).
3. N. Segev, J. Mulholland, D. Botstein, Cell 52, 915
(1988).
4. P. Novick, C. Field, R. Scheknan, ibid. 21, 205
(1980); B. Goud, A. Salminen, N. C. Walworth, P.
Novick, ibid. 53, 753 (1988); A. Salminen and P. J.
Novick, ibid. 49, 527 (1987).
5. D. Gallwitz, C. Donath, C. Sander, Nature 306, 707 Potential of Visual Cortex to Develop an Array of
(1983); H. D. Schmitt, P. Wagner, E. Pfaff, D.
Gallwitz, Cell 47, 401 (1986). Functional Units Unique to Somatosensory Cortex
6. H. Haubruck, C. Disela, P. Wagner, D. Gallwitz,
EMBOJ. 6,4049 (1987); N. Touchot, P. Chardin, BRADLEY L. SCHLAGGAR AND DENNIS D. M. OTLEARY*
A. Tavitian, Proc. Nad. Acad. Sci. U.SA. 84, 8210
(1987).
7. D. Baker, L. Wuestehube, R. Scheknman, D. Bot- The identification of specalized areas in the mammalian neocortex, such as the primary
stein, N. Segev, Proc. Nad. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87,
355 (1990). visual or somatosensory cortex, is based on distinctions in architectural and functional
8. R. A. Bacon, A Salminen, H. Ruohola, P. Novick, features. The extent to which certain features that distinguish neocortical areas in rats
S. Ferro-Novick, J. Cell Biol. 109, 1015 (1989). are prespecified or emerge as a result of epigenetic interactions was investigated. Late
9. R. D. Burgoyne, Trends Biochem. Sci. 14, 394
embryonic visual cortex transplanted to neonatal somatosensory cortex was later