Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/306924529
Article in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A Journal of Power and Energy · August 2016
DOI: 10.1177/0957650916663326
CITATIONS READS
32 2,504
4 authors, including:
Xiaojun Li Yi Li
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University Zhejiang Sci-Tech University
45 PUBLICATIONS 475 CITATIONS 40 PUBLICATIONS 419 CITATIONS
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Xiaojun Li on 16 August 2018.
Abstract
Unstable or flat head-flow curves can cause problems in parallel operations or in flat systems. Despite the considerable
efforts that have been devoted to the study of head-flow curve instability in single-stage centrifugal pumps with volute
casing, the cause of such phenomenon is not sufficiently understood. In this study, we investigated the variation of
hydraulic losses based on the relationship between velocity distribution and entropy generation fields. Steady-state and
unsteady simulations were obtained for a pump with an impeller outlet diameter of 174 mm, and the unsteady results are
more coincided with the experiments. Results showed that the losses mainly focused on the blade suction surface and
volute tongue, as well as in the region of the volute discharge at high flow rates. The entropy generation rate of the pump
casing at partial flow rates changed slightly with a decrease in flow rate, whereas the energy losses in the impeller
increased steeply when the flow rate dropped to 35 m3/h (the design flow rate was 60 m3/h). The losses in the impeller
were mainly concentrated on the region near the inlet and outlet and were lower near the impeller inlet than near the
impeller outlet, where a counter-rotating vortex was developed near the blade trailing edge. The vortex caused a drastic
increase in the entropy generation rate on the pressure surface and in the flow passage. Such increase was the main cause
of the head-flow characteristic instability.
Keywords
Centrifugal pump, head-flow curve instability, entropy generation rate, rotor–stator interaction, hydraulic loss, internal
flow
Introduction
averaged head instability by altering the characteris-
A single-stage single-entry pump with volute casing is tics of the volute casing is not without uncertainties
currently the most common type of centrifugal pump. because the interaction of a volute casing with an
Although centrifugal pumps of this type are relatively impeller is weaker than that with a diffuser, although
simple in design, are easy to maintain and operate and the volute casing exerts a significant effect on pump
offer a wide range of stable operations, ensuring that performance. Worster10 presented an overview of the
the shape of the head-flow characteristic decreases flow in volutes and discussed in detail the geometric
monotonically from shut-off to the maximum possible parameters of a pump (gap between the impeller and
flow rate remains a challenge. The head-flow charac- the volute tongue, volute throat areas, shape of volute
teristic instability of this volute-type centrifugal pump cross section, surface roughness, etc.) and their effects
is caused by an abrupt increase in the hydraulic losses on centrifugal pump performance. Dong et al.11 and
in the stator, in the impeller or in both; it is also Alemi et al.12 investigated the effect of the modifica-
associated with a flat or a positive slope of the curve tion of volute tongue geometry on the hydraulic
at deep part load conditions.1–3 The relative motion
between an impeller and a stator also introduces Key Laboratory of Fluid Transmission Technology of Zhejiang Province,
unfavourable pump performance characteristics, espe- Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China
cially for pumps with diffusers.4–7 In such a case,
Corresponding author:
the rotating stall in a diffuser is enough to cause the
Zuchao Zhu, Key Laboratory of Fluid Transmission Technology of
instability of the head-flow curve, and the losses in the Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018,
diffuser account for most of the losses in the pump.8,9 China.
However, drastically improving or eliminating the Email: zuczhu@163.com
performances of centrifugal pumps; a shortened volute Krause et al.23 performed particle image velocimetry
tongue and an enlarged radial gap between the impeller to investigate the influence of blade geometry on the
and the volute tongue resulted in an unstable operating flow instabilities in a radial pump; they observed a
range that ultimately led to a shut-off condition. counter-rotating recirculation flow near the impeller
However, defining the respective roles of volute outlet in all three impellers at 20% of the design flow
tongue shape change and impeller–volute interaction rate. Despite the fact that flow is fully blocked in an
on characteristic instability is difficult because the mag- impeller with a single-circular arc blade (CA impeller)
nitude of pressure pulsation caused by the impeller– but can still circulate at a low rate along the pressure
volute interaction is also reduced in those processes. side for an impeller with a constant reduction in rela-
Baun et al.13,14 presented concentric volutes, which tive velocity (CONST impeller), the head of a pump
are characterised by larger gaps between the impeller with a CA impeller is higher at a 20% flow rate; how-
and the volute tongue and a weaker intensity of the ever, the reason for such difference is not available in
impeller–volute interaction in comparison with spiral the literature. Unlike other impellers, a CA impeller
volutes, to ensure a stable head-flow characteristic features a large recirculation zone along the direction
curve in some situations. Increasing the area of the of its rotation in the middle of the channel. The local
volute cross section and throat expands the stable oper- vortices that form at the impeller inlet also produce
ating range of pumps.15–17 Chang et al.18 pointed out backflow at reduced flow rates. Sinha et al.24 pro-
that a volute casing with a cross-sectional area that is posed a flow straightener (honeycombs and screen)
10% larger than that of a standard model is optimal at at the inlet to smoothen the inflow and overcome
low flow. However, increasing the area tends to modify backflow. Miyabe et al.25 placed a swirl stop at the
the pump head characteristics in terms of the overall inlet of a mixed flow pump and found that the flow
flow rates and significantly flattens the head-flow curve. rate at which characteristic instability occurs is rela-
Despite the fact that extensive suggestions can be tively low. Cheah et al.26 compared volute pumps with
applied to stabilise pump head characteristics, the straight and curved intake sections and found that the
existing knowledge on the unstable characteristics of counter-rotating vortex that develops at the inlet
pumps is still not satisfying because of the complexity severely affects characteristic instability.
of flow structures and geometric parameters. Currently, close attention should be paid to deter-
Consequently, a method with a stabilising effect on mining the relationship between the flow structures
one pump may prove invalid on another pump. (i.e., a stall cell or a vortex) in hydraulic components
Take for example, the number of impeller blades; an and the unstable characteristics of centrifugal pumps.
appropriate increase in the number of blades is known The relationship between flow field and hydraulic
to be helpful in controlling flow patterns at reduced losses can be used as an alternative because pump
flow rates. The numerical analyses of the low-specific- heads can be characterised by hydraulic losses.
speed high-speed centrifugal pump carried out by According to Herwig and coworkers,27,28 hydraulic
Jafarzadeh et al.19 showed that a pump with a losses can be determined with entropy generation rate
seven-blade impeller exhibits a stable head curve (EGR), and an optimisation strategy based on EGR
and that the corresponding characteristic of a five- can be applied to minimise the losses of conduit com-
blade impeller in the same volute is unstable. A simi- ponents. The generation of entropy was introduced by
lar experiment was performed by Baun and Flack,13 Li et al.8 and Gong et al.29 to analyse hydraulic losses
but they obtained contradicting results. In our previ- in hydro turbines; the authors concluded that the
ous studies,20,21 the head of a pump with 16 blades entropy generation analysis method has the advantage
could not be measured when the rotating speed was of determining the quantity of energy dissipation and
8500 r/min because of the severe head fluctuation at where the dissipation occurs. Therefore, EGR field and
deep part load conditions. The numerical result local flow velocity distribution are adopted in the pre-
showed an undesirable recirculation near the impeller sent work to analyse the cause of the head-flow curve
outlet. Eight more splitter blades were added near the instability of a single-stage centrifugal pump.
pressure side of the full blades to overcome the char- The paper is arranged as follows. First, brief
acteristic instability. Shojaeefard et al.22 experimen- descriptions of the entropy generation method,
tally and numerically investigated the effects of the numerical modelling and test apparatus are presented.
viscosity of fluids on the centrifugal pump perform- Then, the results of the numerical simulation per-
ance and flow pattern in the impeller. They found that formed with the ANSYS-CFX 16.2 are shown. The
the centrifugal pump head-flow curve is unstable analysis is focused on the change in flow topology and
when handling water. Although high viscosity results hydraulic losses with a decrease in flow rate. Finally,
in rapid increases in hydraulic losses, the correspond- the experimental results obtained under various rotat-
ing characteristic remains stable during the pumping ing speeds and impeller diameters are provided to
of oil. This condition may be partly caused by the verify the effect of rotor–stator interaction on head-
reduction of flow detachments at the impeller outlet. flow characteristic instability.
" #
@u 2 @v 2 @w 2 @u @v 2 Here, the symbol V means the whole flow passage
S_000 ¼ 2 þ þ þ þ of the volute-type centrifugal pump, including the
T @x @y @z @y @x
2 2 ! impeller and the pump casing as well as the leaking
@u @v @v @w flow passage. Once the local EGR S_000 and the overall
þ þ þ þ
@z @x @z @y entropy generation S_ have been evaluated by the
ð1Þ above relations, the relationship between the velocity
and EGR field can be easily obtained.
assuming an isothermal flow at a temperature T. In addition, as the impeller and pump casing have
For turbulent flows with the Reynolds-averaged difference volume, the EGR per unit volume is intro-
equations, the local EGR S_000 can be expressed by duced to compare the energy losses in the impeller and
the following relation31 the pump casing, defined as
Z
S_000 ¼ S_000 _000
D þSD0 ð2Þ S_0 ¼
1
S_000 dV ð9Þ
V V
0
with the subscripts D and D for the contributions due
to the time-averaged movement and fluctuations of
the velocity field, respectively. They are Main data of the investigated pump and
" # test rig
@u 2 @v 2 @w 2 @u @v 2 Experimental apparatus
S_000
D ¼ 2 þ þ þ þ
T @x @y @z @y @x
2 2 ! Figure 1 shows the test equipment, which is a closed
@u @v @v @w one that consists of three parts: the recycle water flow
þ þ þ þ
@z @x @z @y loop, model pump and data acquisition equipment.
ð3Þ The facility water is held in a 4.5-m3 stainless steel
" #
reservoir tank, a rotary-vane vacuum pump is used
to adjust the pressure inside the reservoir tank and
@u0 2 @v0 2 @w0 2 @u0 @v0 2
S_000
D0 ¼ 2 þ þ þ þ the flow rate is varied by the outlet butterfly valve
T @x @y @z @y @x
0 ! and is measured by a turbine flowmeter. A 7.5-kW
2 2
@u @v0 @v0 @w0 AC electromotor powered by a variable frequency
þ þ þ þ
@z @x @z @y controller was used to drive the test pump. The rota-
ð4Þ tional speed is measured using a photoelectric tach-
ometer. Both the suction and discharge average
The values of S_000
D in equation (3) can be directly pressure signals are measured by piezoelectric pres-
obtained by the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) sure transducers with the ranges from 1 to 1 bar
results, but not S_000
D0 in equation (4). According to at the inlet and 0 to 6 bar installed at the outlet of
Kock and Herwig,32 a basic model which basically the pump. In order to ensure the stability of the aver-
relates S_000
D0 to the turbulence dissipation rate " and age pressure, four-point connections are adopted, and
which can be justified in the limit of infinite Reynolds the positions of the sensors are shown in Figure 2.
numbers. The distribution of S_000
D0 in the field can be A PXI 4472B data acquisition module which was
approximately given by the expression made by National Instruments Company was applied
to capture the electric signals and convert them to
!k digital signals.
S_000
D0 ¼ ð5Þ
T
Figure 1. Schematic of the closed test rig (not drawn to scale): (1), (3) and (13) ball valve; (2) vacuum pump; (4) pressure tank;
(5) and (10) butterfly valve; (6) gate valve; (7) turbine flowmeter; (8) pressure transducer; (9) test pump; (11) electromotor and
(12) buffer tank.
speed nd ¼ 2900 r/min and flow rate Qd ¼ 60 m3/h. The styrene. The impellers were fitted in the same volute
main geometric parameters of the pump are presented casing, and series of experiments were performed at
in Table 1. various speeds to determine the pump characteristics
The reduction of impeller outlet diameter and without cavitation. Table 2 shows the experimental
rotating speed was proposed to investigate the influ- results at the best efficiency point (BEP) at the
ence of rotor–stator interaction on head-flow curve design speed of 2900 r/min (Figure 4).
instability. The pump impeller was reduced in 4 mm
diameter steps from the initial outlet diameter D2 ¼ Numerical method and model
174 mm to the final D2 ¼ 162 mm. A two-dimensional
description
blade perpendicular to the shrouds was designed in
the impeller exit area to maintain an approximate Hexahedral grid elements for all the pump parts were
constant blade angle at the exit, 2 ¼ 20 , and increase generated with ANSYS ICEM-CFD 16.2, and care
the impeller outlet width slightly. Four impellers with was taken to concentrate the grid in the tongue
different diameters were produced with a rapid proto- region of the volute. All the stationary parts of the
typing technology and using acrylonitrile butadiene pump passage and pump casing were assembled
Figure 3. Outline of the centrifugal pump: (a) section view of the pump and (b) pump passage.
Figure 4. Impeller with maximum outlet diameter: (a) 3D model and (b) photograph.
Figure 5. Grid view of centrifugal pump: (a) axial section view and (b) middle section view.
calculated with the SST k-! turbulence model. For characteristic curves over a wide flow range were in
the convergence criteria, the steady-state calculations reasonable agreement with the experimental results
continued until all the root mean square (RMS) resi- for both stationary and transient conditions. The
duals dropped below 2 105. The RMS 4 1 105 hydraulic efficiency calculated numerically remained
was imposed as the convergence criterion for transi- slightly higher than the experimental values for
ent calculations. The simulation time was 25 revo- almost the whole range, whereas the transient results
lutions with 180 time steps per impeller revolution. matched the experimental values better. For the pre-
Furthermore, the interfaces between the rotor and dicted head, the stationary calculation head was
its neighbouring sub-domains were set up as a slightly lower than the experimental value, possibly
frozen rotor for the steady-state and transient rotor– because the pump head was at its minimum when the
stator in transient solutions. impeller blade was at 0 .33 The head values obtained
The measured and predicted performances of the from the steady-state calculation were very close to
centrifugal pump are displayed in Figure 7 to validate that of the transient calculation at the design condition
the calculation accuracy of the current numerical and overload operating conditions, whereas the differ-
method. Each transient result was based on the aver- ence of the two gradually increased with a decrease in
aged value of the last two impeller revolutions. The flow rate. The transient calculation showed a steeper
results of the stationary calculations are also pre- head curve than the experimental values and a strong
sented for comparison. In this situation, the relative instability in the deep part load operation.
position of the angle between the blade trailing edge Figure 8 presents the comparison of the pressure
and the volute tongue was 0 . The predicted pump coefficient fluctuations in the frequency domains and
the numerical simulation and experiments for both where p and p are the static and time average static
1.0Qd and 0.5Qd at the pump outlet. The monitor pressures, respectively and u1 is the circumferential
point was set at the same location as that in the velocity at the impeller inlet.
experiment for comparison, as shown in Figure 2. At the BEP, the blade passing frequency
The pressure coefficient cp is defined as follows (6f0 ¼ 290 Hz, f0 is axial frequency) caused by the
rotor–stator interaction and its harmonics were the
2ð p pÞ dominant components for both the numerical and
cp ¼ 2
ð10Þ
u1 experimental results. The predicted frequency compo-
nent coincided with the experiment result, whereas the
amplitude was over predicted. An evident difference
between the blade passing frequency and its har-
monics can be found at 0.5Qd despite their predom-
inant roles in pressure fluctuations. Moreover, the
sub-peak of the pressure fluctuation with different
values was obtained near the axial frequency in the
numerical simulation and experiments.
Figure 8. Frequency spectra of pressure fluctuations near the pump outlet, CFD versus measurements: (a) Qd and (b) 0.5Qd.
Figure 9. EGR data under various flow rates: (a) total EGR and (b) entropy production rate per unit volume.
with a decrease in flow rate, and no obvious difference Figure 10 presents the distribution of the EGR in
could be found in the entropy generation data when blade-to-blade view at 0.7 span, which is shown in
the pump operated at the head instability region. Figure 3, for different flow rates. The EGR in the
Hence, the energy losses in the volute casing were impeller changed slightly when the pump operated
probably not the main reason for the instability of near the BEP. In these conditions, the area featuring
the averaged pump head. The energy losses that a high EGR was located at the blade leading edge for
occurred in the impeller accounted for most of the suction and pressure surfaces at the impeller outlet.
instability under deep part load conditions. This behaviour indicated that the energy loss was
Figures 10 and 11, respectively, report the EGR mainly caused by the shock at the leading edge and
distributions with the same range values in the impel- the wake effect at the trailing edge. The high-speed
ler passages and blade surface regions. These EGR leakage flow (jet-flow) in the gap between the impeller
distributions were used to investigate the relevant and the volute tongue was attributed to the non-uni-
details of the internal flow losses in the impeller at form velocity distribution near the impeller outlet, as
various flow rates. Flow rates were selected to show shown in Figure 11(g), which caused an obvious dif-
the transition of the decreasing flow rate from the flow ference in the EGR distribution between the adjacent
in which no flow separation occurs to the conditions impeller passages (Figure 10(g)). At high flow rates,
of massive stall in the impeller passage. The instant- the increasing value of the EGR mainly focused on
aneous velocity vector in the impeller is also presented the blade suction surface because no obvious flow
in Figure 11 for comparison. separation in the flow passage was observed; the
Figure 10. Distribution of EGR in blade-to-blade view at 0.7 span. (a) Q = 8 m3/h; (b) 13 m3/h; (c) 18 m3/h; (d) 25 m3/h; (e) 30 m3/h
and (f) 35 m3/h.
EGR: entropy generation rate.
Figure 11. Distribution on the blades and instantaneous velocity vector in the passages at: (a) 8 m3/h; (b) 13 m3/h; (c) 18 m3/h; (d) 25 m3/h;
(e) 30 m3/h; (f) 35 m3/h; (g) 50 m3/h; (h) 70 m3/h and (i) 80 m3/h.
Figure 12. Relative velocity vectors at impeller mid span during one time period for 30 m3/h: (a) 0.256 T; (b) 0.422 T; (c) 0.589 T; (d)
0.661 T; (e) 0.711 T; (f) 0.733T; (g) 0.756 T and (h) 0.778 T.
research, that is, the incident flow acting on the blade mainly concentrated on the region near the impeller
leading edge may cause relatively high energy losses at inlet and outlet. The value near the impeller inlet was
large flow rates, and advancing the leading edge is lower than that near the impeller outlet, where a coun-
helpful in eliminating head-flow instability. ter-rotating vortex developed near the blade trailing
As mentioned previously, the total EGR increased edge (pressure side); the same was not observed under
steeply when the flow rate dropped to 35 m3/h. a flow pattern of 35 m3/h. These conditions explained
Figures 10 and 11 show that the high EGR was the increase in losses (Figures 11(e)). As the flow
Figure 14. Comparison of head-flow curves of centrifugal pump with different slots.
Figure 15. EGR distribution in the volute at: (a) 13 m3/h; (b) 18 m3/h; (c) 25 m3/h; (d) 35 m3/h; (e) 40 m3/h; (f) 60 m3/h; (g) 70 m3/h
and (h) 80 m3/h.
further decreased, the enlarged counter-rotating characteristic instability. The two slots had the same
vortex caused a strong reserve flow in the entire area configurations (width of 2 mm and depth of 3 mm), but
of one impeller passage, and a drastic increase in the their positions were different. They were evenly
EGR occurred on the pressure surface and in the flow arranged around the impeller shaft. One had a distance
passage (Figures 10(b) and 11(b)). to the shaft of 0.75D2 and was thus named as the 0.75D
Figure 12 shows the evolution of the counter- model, and the other had a distance to the shaft of
rotating vortex in the impeller channel and its effects 0.86D2 and was thus named as the 0.86D model. The
on the EGR distribution on the blade surfaces. The impellers were also produced with the rapid prototyp-
flow separation that occurred at the impeller outlet led ing technology and then measured in the closed test rig.
to the partial blocking of the impeller channels near Experimental head curves with two different con-
the volute tongue. Moreover, the flow separation zone ditions are shown in Figure 14, which also shows the
appeared on the impeller channel next to the tongue in result of the impeller with a diameter of 174 mm, as
the time sequence, and the zone did not propagate previously presented in Figure 8, for comparison. The
to the adjacent channels but tended to disappear 0.75D model with slots located in the interaction
with the rotation of the impeller. At the same time, region of the vortices with opposite rotating directions
a new separation zone was found in the next channel. could suppress the instability of the head-flow. The
With the effect of the counter-rotating vortex, the dir- probable explanation is that the flow structure inside
ection of the relative velocity vectors changed at the the impeller was disturbed and that the jet-wake flow
trailing edge of the impeller. The flow impinged at the exit of the impeller caused by secondary flows
against the blade pressure surface, and this impinge- was weakened. As the head is sensitive to the geom-
ment could explain the high hydraulic losses in the etry parameters of the impeller outlet, more attention
impeller channel close to the volute tongue. should be paid to the ways to deal with these param-
Two types of slots with rectangular cross-sectional eters. The pump with the 0.86D model had a negative
areas installed near the blade trailing edge close to the effect on the head-flow performance curve. This result
hub were proposed (Figure 13) to analyse the influence showed that the pump head was lower than the con-
of the counter-rotating vortex on the head-flow ventional one over the entire flow rate range.
Figure 16. Comparison of head-flow curves of centrifugal pump with different impeller outlet diameters and rotating speeds.
(a) D2 ¼ 174 mm; (b) 170 mm; (c) 166 mm; (d) 162 mm.
7. Miyabe M, Furukawa A, Maeda H, et al. A behavior of 24. Sinha M, Pinarbasi A and Katz J. The flow structure
the diffuser rotating stall in a low specific speed mixed- during onset and developed states of rotating stall
flow pump. Int J Fluid Mach Syst 2009; 2: 113–121. within a vaned diffuser of a centrifugal pump. ASME
8. Li X, Yuan S, Pan Z, et al. Dynamic characteristics of J Fluids Eng 2001; 123: 490–499.
rotating stall in mixed flow pump. J Appl Math 2013; 25. Miyabe M, Furukawa A, Maeda H, et al. On improve-
2013: ID 104629. ment of characteristic instability and internal flow in
9. Stel H, Amaral G, Negrao C, et al. Numerical analysis mixed flow pumps. J Mech Sci Technol 2008; 3:
of the fluid flow in the first stage of a two-stage centri- 732–743.
fugal pump with a vaned diffuser. ASME J Fluids Eng 26. Cheah K, Lee T and Winoto S. Numerical study of inlet
2013; 135: 071104. and impeller flow structures in centrifugal pump at
10. Worster RC. The flow in volutes and its effect on cen- design and off-design points. Int J Fluid Mach Syst
trifugal pump performance. ARCHIVE Proc Inst Mech 2011; 4: 25–32.
Eng 1963; 177: 843–875. 27. Herwig H, Gloss D and Wenterodt T. A new approach
11. Dong R, Chu S and Katz J. Effect of modification to to understanding and modelling the influence of wall
tongue and impeller geometry on unsteady flow, pres- roughness on friction factors for pipe and channel
sure fluctuation and noise in a centrifugal pump. ASME flows. J Fluid Mech 2008; 613: 35–53.
J Turbomach 1997; 119: 506–515. 28. Schmandt B and Herwig H. Losses due to conduit com-
12. Alemi H, Nourbakhsh S, Raisee M, et al. Effect of the ponents: an optimization strategy and its application.
volute tongue profile on the performance of a low spe- ASME J Fluids Eng 2016; 138: 031204.
cific speed centrifugal pump. Proc IMechE, Part A: J 29. Gong R, Wang H, Chen L, et al. Application of entropy
Power and Energy 2014; 229: 210–220. production theory to hydro-turbine hydraulic analysis.
13. Baun D and Flack R. Effects of volute design and number Sci China Technol Sci 2013; 56: 1636–1643.
of impeller blades on lateral impeller forces and hydraulic 30. Bejan A. Entropy generation through heat and fluid flow.
performance. Int J Rot Mach 2003; 9: 145–152. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982.
14. Baun D, Kostner L and Flack R. Effect of relative 31. Bejan A. Entropy generation minimization: the method of
impeller-to-volute position on hydraulic efficiency and thermodynamic optimization of finite-time systems and
static radial force distribution in a circular volute cen- finite-time processes. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1996.
trifugal pump. ASME J Fluids Eng 2000; 122: 598–605. 32. Kock F and Herwig H. Local entropy production in
15. Zhang X, Wang Y, Fu J, et al. Effect of the section area turbulent shear flows: a high-Reynolds number model
of volute in low specific speed centrifugal pumps on with wall functions. Int J Heat Mass Tran 2004; 47:
hydraulic performance. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2205–2215.
fluids engineering division summer meeting, Colorado, 33. Benigni H, Jaberg H, Yeung H, et al. Numerical simu-
USA, 2–6 August 2009, pp.41–50. lation of low specific speed American petroleum insti-
16. Ahmed A-O, Suman P, Asim T, et al. Numerical studies tute pumps in part-load operation and comparison with
of the velocity distribution within the volute of a cen- test rig results. ASME J Fluids Eng 2012; 134: 024501.
trifugal pump. In: 27th international congress of condi- 34. Cavazzini G, Pavesi G, Santolin A, et al. Using splitter
tion monitoring and diagnostic engineering management, blades to improve suction performance of centrifugal
Brisbane, Australia, 16–18 September 2014. impeller pumps. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and
17. Alemi H, Nourbakhsh S, Raisee M, et al. Effects of Energy 2014; 229: 1–15.
volute curvature on performance of a low specific- 35. Sen M and Breugelmans F. Reverse flow, prerotation
speed centrifugal pump at design and off-design condi- and unsteady flow in centrifugal pumps. In: NEL fluid
tions. ASME J Turbomach 2015; 137: 041009. mechanics silver jubilee conference, Glasgow, UK, 27–29
18. Chang H, Jin H, Kim M, et al. Spiral casing of a volute November 1979.
centrifugal pump. J Mech Sci Technol 2014; 28:
2697–2706.
19. Jafarzadeh B, Hajari A, Alishahi M, et al. The flow
simulation of a low-specific-speed high-speed centrifu- Appendix
gal pump. Appl Math Model 2011; 35: 242–249.
20. Cui B, Zhu Z, Zhang J, et al. The flow simulation and
Notation
experimental study of low-specific-speed high-speed b2 blade width at exit (mm)
complex centrifugal impellers. Chin J Mech Eng 2006; b3 inlet width of volute (mm)
14: 435–441. Do outlet diameter of pump (mm)
21. Zhu Z, Chen Y, Huang D, et al. Experimental study on Ds inlet diameter of pump (mm)
high-speed centrifugal pumps with different impellers.
D1 inlet diameter of impeller (mm)
Chin J Mech Eng 2002; 15: 372–375.
D2 outlet diameter of impeller (mm)
22. Shojaeefard M, Tahani M, Ehghaghi M, et al.
Numerical study of the effects of some geometric char-
D3 volute tongue diameter (mm)
acteristics of a centrifugal pump impeller that pumps a f0 axial frequency (Hz)
viscous fluid. Comput Fluids 2012; 60: 61–70. H pump head (m)
23. Krause N, Pap E, Thévenin D, et al. Influence of the Hd designed pump head (m)
blade geometry on flow instabilities in a radial pump k turbulence kinetic energy (m2/s2)
elucidated by time-resolved particle-image velocimetry. L intake/discharge pipe length (m)
In: ASME Turbo Expo 2007: power for land, sea, and n rotation speed (r/min)
air, Montreal, Canada, 14–17 May 2007, GT2007-27455. nd designed rotation speed (r/min)