Self-defense (United States)

In the United States, self-defense is an affirmative defense that is used to justify the use of force by
one person against another person under specific circumstances.

Contents
General rule
Exceptions, limitations, and imperfect defense
Retreat
See also
References

General rule
In the U.S., the general rule is that "[a] person is privileged to use such force as reasonably appears
necessary to defend him or herself against an apparent threat of unlawful and immediate
violence from another."[1] In cases involving non-deadly force, this means that the person must
reasonably believe that their use of force was necessary to prevent imminent, unlawful physical
harm.[2] When the use of deadly force is involved in a self-defense claim, the person must also
reasonably believe that their use of deadly force is immediately necessary to prevent the other's
infliction of great bodily harm or death.[3] Most states no longer require a person to retreat before
using deadly force. In the minority of jurisdictions which do require retreat, there is no obligation to
retreat when it is unsafe to do so or when one is inside one's own home.[4]

Exceptions, limitations, and imperfect defense

A person who was the initial aggressor cannot claim self-defense as a justification unless they
abandon the combat or the other party has responded with excessive force.[5] If the aggressor has
abandoned the combat, they normally must attempt to communicate that abandonment to the other
party.[6]

In the past, one could resist an unlawful arrest and claim self-defense, however the modern trend is
to move away from that rule.[7] In most jurisdictions allowing a person to resist an unlawful arrest,
the state requires that the unlawful arrest be accompanied by excessive force.[8] The older view is
represented by the U.S. Supreme Court case Bad Elk v. United States[9] where an off-duty Sioux
police officer was granted a new trial after being convicted of killing an on-duty police officer who
was attempting to illegally arrest the man, because, at the initial trial, the jury was not instructed that
it could convict on a lesser offense, such as manslaughter.
In some jurisdictions, there is an imperfect self-defense rule, where an individual who mistakenly
believes that he was justified in using deadly force in self-defense, but is not legally justified, may
have a murder conviction reduced to a manslaughter conviction instead.[10]

Retreat
A majority of U.S. jurisdictions do not follow the common law rule that a person must retreat prior to
using deadly force,[11] but rather have rejected this theory via statutory law in what are known as
"stand your ground laws", which explicitly remove the duty to retreat.[12] Whether the person
retreated may, however, be relevant as to the reasonableness of the use of deadly force, where there
isn't an explicit statutory law which affirmatively removes the duty.[13] Under the common law rule
and the rule in a minority of states, the actor must have shown that he or she retreated prior to using
deadly force unless: 1) it was not safe to retreat; or 2) the incident occurred at the actor's home.[14] In
addition, the Model Penal Code requires retreat or compliance, if it can be done with complete
safety.[15]

See also
Right of self-defense
Use of force

References
1. GEORGE E. DIX, GILBERT LAW SUMMARIES: CRIMINAL LAW xxxiii (18th ed. 2010) (original emphasis); see
generally DAVID C. BRODY & JAMES R. ACKER, CRIMINAL LAW 130 (2014).
2. BRODY, at 130; DIX, at xxiii.
3. BRODY, at 137; DIX, at xxiii; RANETA LAWSON MACK, A LAYPERSON'S GUIDE TO CRIMINAL LAW 141 (1999).
4. DIX, at xxiii.
5. United States v. Peterson (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=122330901264467285
63&q=%22483+F.2d+1222%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2006), 483 F.2d 1222, 1231 (D.C. Cir. 1973); DIX,
at xxiv; MACK, at 143-44.
6. Peterson, at 1231; DIX, at xxiv; MACK, at 143-44.
7. BRODY, at 148; DIX, at xxiv.
8. DIX, at xxiv.
9. Bad Elk v. United States (https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1357777347127207094
0&q=%22177+U.S.+529%22&hl=en&as_sdt=2006), 177 U.S. 529 (1900).
10. DIX, at xxiv; MACK, at 142-43.
11. BRODY, at 139; DIX, at 135
12. LAURA L. FINLEY, CRIME AND PUNISHMENT IN AMERICA: AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF TRENDS AND CONTROVERSIES IN
THE JUSTICE SYSTEM 528 (2017).
13. DIX, at 135.
14. DIX, at 134.
15. DIX, at 134-35.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Self-defense_(United_States)&oldid=1000480143"

This page was last edited on 15 January 2021, at 08:07 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site,
you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.,
a non-profit organization.