MONTHLY ASSESSMENT -III (Detail Design, Prototype and Test phase)

(This assessment shall be done by another guide of department or

interdepartmentally along with guide) (DATE : 08/07/2021)

1. Which theoretical subjects/concepts are involved with your project? How is it useful to
your project?
The theoretical formulated to explain, predict, and understand phenomena and, in many cases, to
challenge and extend existing knowledge within the limits of critical bounding
assumptions.Corruption is dishonest behavior by those in positions of power, such as managers or
government officials.

2. Which software/design tool/Skills you have learned/applied during the project? Explain the
features of it.
Create countless plans based on Make unused list items inactive,Regularly re-sort your lists,If
your performance slows, consider reducing your file size,Use the Condense Feature.Use claims
to see the impact on cost, and contribution .

3. Explain the prototype/model prepared by the student/team.

First usercanusethisformndfillingit.inthisformwehavecreatediffrent typeof features like employee
verification,user registration,complaints can be registered and government access

4. What are the materials, technology, things utilized to make the prototype/model?
We use some tools to prepare prototype models like for Framework we use Html, database
Administration ions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect. relevant
work

5. How many Iterations have you done to reach the final solution? Explain modification/revise
parameters/characteristics for each iteration.
We have done so many iterations to reach the final solution. A project can align
development/technology needs to Employee goals stakeholder will be able to see key
ministers,audit institution,independent media and judicial authorities._

6. What is the scope of the project? How are you planning to implement it in future?
Keep citizens engaged on corruption at local, national, international and global levels – in line with the
scale and scope of corruption. Make use of the architecture that has been developed and the platforms that
exist for engagement.

1
SUGGESTIONS BY EVALUATOR:
PROTOTYPE/MODEL SUGGESTIONS:

GENERAL SUGGESTIONS:

Overall Mark, considering assessment I & II (Out of 10):

Department/Interdepartmental Evaluator name and sign:

Guide sign:
Date:

2
 FINAL ASSESSMENT AT THE END OF SEMESTER

EVALUATOR MEMBERS DETAILS:

NAME INSTITUTE & DEPARTMENT SIGN.

1.

2.

3.

ASSESSMENT SUMMARY:
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: MARKS OBTAINED

MONTHLY ASSESSMENT - I

MONTHLY ASSESSMENT - II

MONTHLY ASSESSMENT - III

TOTAL (Out of 20)

FINAL EVALUATION/VIVA MARKS (Out of 80)

TOTAL (Out of 100)

EXAMINER COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS:

DATE:
INTERNAL GUIDE SIGN HOD SIGN COLLEGE SEAL