18102019LAZI7NT4compresspdf huK8mO1o

ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT
REPORT
“FOR DONG FANG ELECTRIC (INDIA)

PRIVATE LIMITED”
AT
AH-5, MAR: 16-1111, NEW TOWN, RAJARHAT, KOLKATA-700163
PROJECT PROPONENT
DONGFANG ELECTRIC (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT
GREENCINDIA CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED
NABET DISCLOSURE
DONGFANG ELECTRIC (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED NABET
ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT DISCLOSURE
NABET DISCLOSURE
Experts Declaration for the Contribution in preparation of EIA Report for Dongfang Electric
(India) Private Limited at AH-5, Mar: 16 – 1111, Mahishghat, New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata.
I, hereby, certify that we were part of the team in the following capacity that developed the
above project document.
Sector : 8(A) Building and Construction projects

Name of Environment Co-ordinator : Rahul Singh
Signature & Date
Period of Involvement : August 2017 to January 2019

608-611, Level-5, Shopprix Mall, Sector-5, Vaishali,
Contact Information :
NCR, Ghaziabad-201010
Functional Area Experts:

Sl. Functional Name of the
Task Signature
No. Areas Experts
A CORE FUNCTIONAL AREAS
A- Water Swagata  Water samples were
1 Pollution Mukherjee collected from 3 Ground
Monitoring, Water locations of the
Prevention & study area viz. Project
Control-WP Site, Thakdari,
Mohishgot and 3
Surface Water locations
ie. Project Site – Phase I
Canal, Kestopur Khal
near Loha Pool and
Waterbody at BB Block.
 The results obtained
from ground water
samples revealed that:
o The water samples were
alkaline in nature.
o The alkalinity recorded
in all ground water
samples was exceeding
the acceptable limit
(200 mg/l) but was
within permissible limit
of BIS (600 mg/l).
o The TDS of the samples
PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT

DONGFANG ELECTRIC (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED GREENCINDIA CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED
Task Signature
No. Areas Experts
were within permissible
limits.
o The chloride in the
samples ranged from
53.7 mg/l to 81.0 mg/l
and were within the
permissible limits in the
samples collected.
 Analysis of Surface water
samples revealed that
surface water quality is
no meeting any criteria of
CPCB.
 The total water
requirement of the
project is 79 KLD which
includes 50 KLD of fresh
water and 29 KLD of
treated water. The water
will be supplied by New
Town Kolkata
Development Authority.
 The total wastewater
generation will be 32.69
KLD which will be
treated in a STP of 40
KLD based on MBBR
technology.
 The entire wastewater
shall be reused within the
campus.
A- Municipal Vikas Chandra  During Operation Phase
2 Solid Waste Sharma 105 kg per day solid
waste will be generated
which includes 94.8
kg/day Institutional
waste, 6 kg/day
horticulture waste and
3.70 kg/day of street
sweeping wastes.
o Different colored bins
will be used for
collection of
biodegradable and non-
biodegradable waste as
per MSW Rules, 2016.
o The biodegradable
portion of MSW will be

Task Signature
No. Areas Experts
treated at site by 1
Organic Waste
Converter and manure
generated will be used
for plantation.
o STP sludge and
horticulture waste will
be used as manure.
Recyclable wastes like
paper, plastic, metals
etc. will be sold off to
recyclables.
B. SIGNIFICANT FUNCTIONAL AREA
B-1 Ecology & Dipannita Das  There is no wildlife
Biodiversity- sanctuary or national
EB park within 10km radius
of the Project Site.
 Agricultural land covers
only 16% of the Study
Area. The paddy fields
of East Kolkata
Wetlands (which is just
1.5 km form the project
site) produce 15,000
Metric Tonnes of
additional paddy per
annum.
 Due to presence of East
Kolkata Wetland in the
vicinity of the project
site, important avian
species were recorded
during the study period.
 Trees commonly
observed in the study
area included Banyan,
Gulmohar, Dhak,
Khajur, Teak, Mango,
Neem etc.
 The project site will
have 4149m2 i.e.
20.50% of total plot area
as plantation area. In
addition 2225.85 m2
(11%) of green area will
be developed and
maintained.

Task Signature
No. Areas Experts
B-2 Land Use-LU Rahul Singh  The total plot area of the
project site is 2.0235ha.
 The land for project is
already under
possession of proponent.
 There is no forest land
involved in the project
site nor there is presence
of any water
bodies/drainage
channels at site.
 As per land-use of
Study Area, Built-up
area constitutes about
43.7% of the study area
as the project site is
surrounded by
settlements, complexes
etc. followed by
waterbodies of about
19%.%.
 The rest is primarily
agricultural land and
open scub land
constituting 16.1% and
8.9% respectively.
Marshy land, waste
land, wooded area,
Open land, airport area,
industries, brick kiln
cover 3.3%, 3.0%,
3.3%, 1.1%, 1.1%,
0.3%, 0.2% respectively
of the study area.
B-3 Air Pollution Vikas Chandra  7 air monitoring
Monitoring Sharma locations viz. Project
Prevention Site, Thakdari,
Control-AP Mohishgot, AB Block,
BF Block, Tarulia,
Krishna Nagar were
selected and samples
were collected and
analyzed.
revealed that
concentration of PM10

Task Signature
No. Areas Experts
and PM2.5 are higher
than stipulated limits at
all locations except for
PM2.5 concentration at
Thakdari. The higher
concentration is
attributed to high
vehicular movement and
proximity to major
roads.
 The values of SOx and
NOx are within
permissible limits.
from Air Dispersion
modelling shows NO2 is
contributing maximum
among the pollutants
analysed although the
GLC of NO2 is well
within the prescribed
standard.
 The maximum resultant
GLC of NO2 (49.1
µg/m3) and CO (5.95
µg/m3) among the
monitored locations has
been found to occur at
AAQ4 (AB Block) at a
distance of 0.68km in
NNW direction.
B-4 Soil Dr. PC  The project site is a flat
Conservation- Kuniyal terrain.
SC  The soil samples were
Team collected from 4
Member locations viz. Project
Rahul Singh Site, near CF Block,
near AB Block and near
AF Block.
 The analysis revealed
that pH of the soil is
slightly alkaline.
 The soil samples were
found to have mostly
clayey loam texture.
 The Infiltration rate of

Task Signature
No. Areas Experts
the soil varied from 1.24
cm/hr to 1.38 cm/hr.
 The NPK content was
found to be good for
growth of plants.
B-5 Noise KD Choudhury  Noise monitoring was
carried out at 7 locations
Team viz. Project Site,
Member Thakdari, Mohishgot,
Rahul Singh AB Block, BF Block,
Tarulia and Krishna
Nagar
 The noise level shows
lower values than the
prescribed limit by
CPCB at all locations.
B-6 Hydrogeology Dr. Manoj  On the basis of the
Kumar depth to water level of
the year, the pre
monsoon depth to water
level was monitored
between 2.00 to 13.60
mbgl at the project site.
 The post monsoon depth
to water level was
between 1.64 to 10.66
mbgl.
 The project site have
developed Rainwater
harvesting pit of size
350 m3, which will
collect 3 days of peak
rainfall. Approximately
129.88m3 per day of
water will be stored
during peak rainy month
B-7 Socio- Rahul Singh  The project site is
economic surrounded by
residential buildings and
few commercial
buildings.
 As per the census of
India, 2011, the total
population is 46, 60,303
out of which 24, 29,125
are males and 22,

Task Signature
No. Areas Experts
31,178 are females. The
increase is due to
urbanization of the area
as part of New Town
development.
 Opportunities of higher
education in the study
area average. Literacy
rate in the study area
was found to have
increased in the last
decade.
 The operation of the
project will provide
employment
opportunities to the
locals.
Declaration by the Head of the Accredited Consultant Organization

I Nandini Choudhury, hereby, confirm that the above mentioned experts were involved in
preparation of Environment Impact Assessment Report for Dongfang Electric (India) Private
Limited at AH-5, Mar: 16 – 1111, Mahishghat, New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata. I also confirm
that I shall be fully accountable for any misleading information mentioned in this statement.
Signature:
Name : Nandini Choudhury

Designation : Managing Director
Name of the EIA Consultant Organization : Greencindia Consulting Private Limited
NABET Certificate No. & Issue Date : NABET/EIA/1619/RA0058, June, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENT
ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENT
Details Page No.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E1-E13
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1-1
1.2 PROJECT PROPONENT 1-2
1.3 PROJECT LOCATION 1-2
1.4 NEED OF THE PROJECT 1-3
1.5 THE STUDY 1-3
1.5.1 The Process 1-3
1.5.2 Regulatory Compliance Requirement 1-4
1.6 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT 1-5
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1
2.1 INTRODUCTION 2-1
2.2 PROJECT FEATURES 2-1
2.3 PROJECT CONNECTIVITY 2-1
2.4 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 2-2
2.5 SOLID WASTE GENERATION 2-6
2.6 OCCUPANCY 2-7
2.8 PROJECT COST 2-8
3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 3-1
3.1 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT 3-1
3.2 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 3-1
3.3 METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR STUDY 3-1
3.3.1 Primary Data 3-1
3.3.2 Secondary Data 3-2
3.4 ECO - SENSITIVE FEATURES 3-4
3.5 VULNERABILITY OF THE SITE 3-4
3.5.1 Topography 3-4
3.5.2 Seismicity 3-5
3.6 GEOLOGY 3-5
3.7 HYDROGEOLOGY 3-5
3.8 LANDUSE OF THE STUDY AREA AND PROJECT SITE 3-6
3.8.1 Land use of the Study Area 3-6
3.8.2 Land use of the Project Area 3-7
3.9 SOIL TYPE & CHARACTERISITICS 3-7
3.9.1 Observation and Interpretation 3-9
3.10 WATER ENVIRONMENT 3-10
3.10.1 Area Drainage 3-10
PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

DONGFANG ELECTRIC (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED GREENCINDIA CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED TOC - 1
TABLE OF CONTENT
3.10.2 Hydrogeology 3-11

3.10.3 Water Quality 3-11
3.11 METEOROLOGICAL CONDITION 3-18
3.11.1 Secondary data as per IMD Dum Dum (Kolkata, West Bengal) 3-18
3.11.2 Onsite Meteorological Conditions 3-22
3.12 AIR ENVIRONMENT 3-24
3.12.1 Parameters and Frequency of monitoring and methodology 3-24
3.12.2 Instrument used for sampling and analytical techniques 3-25
3.12.3 Analysis of Baseline Concentration 3-25
3.13 NOISE ENVIRONMENT 3-27
3.13.1 Frequency and Parameters of Sampling 3-27
3.13.2 Instrument used for Sampling 3-28
3.13.3 Sampling and Analytical Techniques 3-28
3.13.4 Monitoring Locations 3-28
3.13.5 Analysis of Baseline Concentration 3-29
3.14 TRAFFIC SCENARIO 3-30
3.15 ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 3-31
3.15.1 Forest Resource 3-31
3.15.2 Project Site 3-32
3.15.3 Cropping Pattern 3-32
3.15.4 Floral & Faunal Composition 3-32
3.16 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 3-34
3.16.1 Demographic Profile 3-34
3.16.2 Household Size 3-35
3.16.3 Child Population Sex Ratio 3-35
3.16.4 Vulnerable Group 3-36
3.16.5 Literacy Rate 3-37
3.16.6 Economic Activities 3-37
3.16.7 Occupational Pattern 3-38
3.16.8 Infrastructure Facilities 3-38
4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION
4-1
MEASURES
4.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF IMPACTS 4-1
4.3 IMPACT ASSESSMENT & MITIGATION PROCESS 4-2
4.3.1 Operation Phase 4-2
5. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 5-1
5.1 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE SITES 5-1
5.2 SELECTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT 5-2
6. ENVIRONMENT MONITORING PROGRAMME 6-1

TABLE OF CONTENT
6.1 THE PLAN 6-1

6.2 PROPOSED MONITORING PROGRAMME 6-1
6.3 COMPILATION & ANALYSIS OF DATA AND REPORTING
6-2
SYSTEM
6.4 ENVIRONMENT MONITORING COST 6-2
7. ADDITIONAL STUDIES 7-1
7.2 RISK ASSESSMENT 7-1
7.3 DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN 7-2
7.3.1 Emergency Response Plan 7-3
7.3.2 Procedure for Treatment 7-6
8. PROJECT BENEFITS 8-1
8.2 PROJECT BENEFITS 8-1
8.3 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIBILITY 8-1
9. ENVIRONMENT COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS 9-1
10. ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
10.2 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT CELL 10-1
10.3 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 10-2
11. SUMMARY & CONCLUSION 10-1
11.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND 11-1
11.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENT 11-1
11.3 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS 11-2
11.4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENT IMPACT AND MITIGATION
11-4
MEASURES
11.5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 11-6
11.6 ENVIRONMENT MONITORING PLAN 11-7
11.7 RISK ASSESSMENT & DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN 11-7
11.8 PROJECT BENEFITS 11-7
11.9 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 11-8
11.10 ASSESSMENT OF EOLOGICAL DAMAGE, REMEDIATION PLAN
11-8
AND NATURAL AND COMMUNITY AUGMENTATION PLAN
12. DISCLOSURE OF THE CONSULTANT 10-1
12.2 AREA OF EXPERTISE 12-1
12.3 ACHIEVEMENT OF THE COMPANY 12-2
12.4 BRIEF RESUME OF TEAM MEMBERS 12-3
12.5 QCI ACCREDIATION OF CERTIFICATE 12-5
12.6 CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDIATION FOR LABORATORY 12-5

TABLE OF CONTENT
13. ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL DAMAGE, REMEDIATION PLAN &

13-1
NATURAL & COMMUNITY RESOURCE AUGMENTATION PLAN
13.2 DAMAGE ASSESSMENT 13-1
13.3 NATURAL RESOURCE AUGMENTATION PLAN 13-2
13.4 COMMUNITY AUGMENTATION PLAN 13-2
13.5 REMEDIATION PLAN 13-3

TABLE OF CONTENT
LIST OF TABLES
SI.No. Name of Tables Page No.
1.1 Project Chronology 1-1
1.2 Details of Site Location 1-2
1.3 Key Environmental Legislation in India 1-4
2.1 Area Statement 2-1
2.2 Surrounding Features within 2km radius 2-2
2.3 Parking Requirement 2-2
2.4 Water requirement during operation phase 2-3
2.5 Inlet & Outlet Sewage characteristics 2-6
2.6 Solid Waste Generation 2-7
2.7 Composition of Waste 2-7
3.1 Primary Data Collection and Method 3-2
3.2 Secondary data Collection 3-3
3.3 Environment Sensitive Location in Study Area 3-4
3.4 Land-Use Pattern of the Study area 3-6
3.5 Soil Characteristics of Study Area 3-7
3.6 Standard Classification of Soil 3-8
3.7 Major waterbodies in the Study Area 3-10
3.8 Standard Operating Procedure for Water Sampling and Analysis 3-12
3.9 Analytical Procedure 3-12
3.10 Water Quality Criteria as per CPCB 3-13
3.11 Surface Water Quality in Study Area 3-14
3.12 Ground Water Quality in Study Area 3-15
3.13 Climatology & Meteorology of Dum Dum (Kolkata) IMD Observatory 3-18
3.14 Summary of Site specific Meteorological Data 3-23
3.15 Air Quality Monitoring Stations 3-24
3.16 Sampling and Analytical Methodology 3-25
3.17 Particulate Matter (PM10) in ug/m3 3-25
3.18 Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in ug/m3 3-25
3.19 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) in ug/m3 3-26
3.20 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) in ug/m3 3-26
3.21 Carbon Monoxide (CO) in mg/m3 3-26
3.22 Consolidated Values of AAQ (98th percentile) 3-26
3.23 Noise Level monitoring Locations 3-28
3.24 Ambient Noise Level in Day time & Night time 3-29
3.25 Existing Traffic Scenario 3-30
3.26 Floral Species recorded in the Study Area 3-32
3.27 Faunal Species recorded in the Study Area 3-33

TABLE OF CONTENT
SI.No. Name of Tables Page No.

3.28 Sex Ratio of the Study area 3-35
3.29 Household Size of Study Area 3-35
3.30 Child Population Sex ratio of Study Area 3-36
3.31 Distribution of SC & ST population in the Study Area 3-37
3.32 Literacy Rate in Study Area 3-37
3.33 Section-wise distribution of workers in the Study Area 3-37
3.34 Occupational pattern in the Study Area 3-38
3.35 Educational Facilities 3-38
3-36 Drinking Water Facilities 3-39
3-37 Medical facilities in Study Area 3-39
3-38 Post Offices & Bank Facilities 3-40
4-1 Description of Impacts during Operation Phase 4-1
4-2 Emission Details 4-2
4-3 Resultant 24 hourly (except CO) 98 P Ground Level Concentration (GLC) during
4-3
Project Operation in µg/m3
4-4 Comparison between Pollution Load before and after Project Scenario 4-4
4-5 Factors considered for RWH Tank Designing 4-7
4-6 Rain Water Harvesting 4-7
4-7 Existing Level of Service 4-8
4-8 Level of Service after Expansion 4-8
4-9 List of Greenbelt Species planted within the Project Site 4-10
4-10 List of plant species for additional greenbelt development 4-10
6-1 Environment Monitoring Programme for Operation Phase 6-1
6-2 Record Keeping Requirements 6-2
6-3 Cost for Environmental Monitoring during Operation Phase 6-2
7-1 Classification of Occupational Hazards 7-1
7-2 Risk Identified in Particular Area 7-1
7-3 Hazard Analysis to Whole Project in General 7-1
7-4 Activities with Mitigation Measures 7-2
7-5 Fire-fighting Equipment Details 7-7
8-1 Budget Allocation for CER Activities 8-2
10-1 Environment Management Plan for operation Phase 10-2
13-1 Cost for Remediation Plan 13-3
13-2 Cost for Natural Resource Augmentation 13-5
13-3 Cost for Community Resource Augmentation 13-5

TABLE OF CONTENT
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Name of Figure
1.1 Location Map
1.2 Site on toposheet
1.3 Coordinate Map
2.1 Water Balance Diagram
3.1 Study Area Map
3.2 Environment Sensitivity Map
3.3 Contour Map
3.4 Slope Map
3.5 Earthquake Hazard Map
3.6 Pie-diagram depicting Land - use pattern of Study Area
3.7 Land- Use Map of Study area
3.8 Soil Sampling Location Map
3.9 Drainage Map
3.10 Water Sampling Location Map
3.11 Monthly average rainfall in mm as per IMD Dum Dum
3.12 Average maximum and minimum temperature (0C)as per IMD Dum Dum
3.13 Relative Humidity during Day and Evening (%) as per IMD Dum Dum
3.14 Wind rose - IMD Dum Dum
3.15 Onsite Windrose - April, 2018
3.16 Air Monitoring Location Map
3.17 Noise Monitoring Location Map
3.18 Ambient Noise Level during Day
3.19 Ambient Noise Level during Night
3.20 Traffic Survey Location Map
10.1 Organogram of Environment Management Cell
13.1 Project Scenario

TABLE OF CONTENT
LIST OF ANNEX
Annex No. Name of Annex
1.1 ToR Letter
1.2 ToR Compliance
1.3 Relevant Standards
2.1 Land Documents
2.2 Master Plan of Project
2.3 Power Approval
2.4 Roof Layout Plan showing location of Solar Panels
2.5 Water Supply Approval
2.6 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Approval
3.1 Hourly Onsite meteorological Data
4.1 Predicted GLCs superimposed on Land-use Map - 10 km for NOx (μg/m3)
4.2 Predicted GLCs superimposed on Land-use Map - 10 km for CO (μg/m3)
5.1 Comparitive Analysis of STP Technologies
12.1 GCPL QCI Certificate
12.2 MoU between GCPL & EEPl
12.3 NABET Accrediation of EEPL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DONGFANG ELECTRIC (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED EXECUTIVE
ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PROJECT BACKGROUND
M/s Dongfang Electric (India) Private Limited operates as subsidiary of Dongfang Electric
Corporation Limited (DEC) and provides sales and support services of power equipment’s.
Dongfang Electric (India) Private Limited has developed a commercial office Building cum Guest House at
Plot no. AH-5, Premises No. Mar:-16-1111, New town, Rajarhat, Kolkata over an area of 2.0235 ha.
The construction work of the project was started on 16th April, 2012 and was completed on 4th July
2016, without obtaining prior environmental clearance as per EIA Notification 2006. The proponent
obtained NOC for operating DG Sets from Directorate of Electricity on 10th August 2015, wherein it
was mentioned to obtain Consent to Establish/Operate from West Bengal Pollution Control Board
(WBPCB). An application for obtaining CTE/CTO was submitted on 27th October 2016.
A query asking the built-up area of the Project (22,100 m2) was raised by WBPCB on 28th October
2016 and the reply was submitted. WBPCB informed the proponent about the requirement of prior
EC and declared the project as violation, as per the EIA Notification 2006 and directed to refer the
matter to MoEF&CC for Environmental Clearance. The project was then considered under violation
category under MoEF&CC’s notification S.0.804 (E) for violation cases dated 14th March, 2017. As
per the said notification; the proponent applied under the violation window on 28th August 2017. The
proponent has not started operating the commercial space till now.
In response to the online submitted application, the ToR was granted by the WB-SEAC via Memo
No. 583-2N-27/2018(E) dated 10th October, 2018.
With reference to the office memorandum dated 15th March 2018 in regard to the appraisal of the
violation cases stating ‘All the proposals of category `B' projects/activities pertaining to different
sectors, received within six months only i.e. up to 13th September, 2017 on the Ministry's portal, but
yet not considered by the EAC in the Ministry, shall be transferred online to the SEAC/SEIAAs in
the respective States/UTs’, the case was subsequently transferred to WB SEIAA via Proposal No.
SIA/WB/NCP/22937/2018.
PROJECT REQUIREMENT
Water: The total water requirement during operation phase will be 79 KLD of which 50 KLD will
be fresh water requirement while 29 KLD of treated water shall be required for flushing, landscaping
and miscellaneous use.

DONGFANG ELECTRIC (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED GREENCINDIA CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED ES -1
Wastewater generation: The total estimated wastewater generation from the project site during
operation phase is 33 KLD.
Sewage Treatment Plant: The wastewater from the project operation shall be treated in a sewage
treatment plant of 40 KL capacity based on MBBR technology.
Power Supply & Back-up: During operation phase the estimated electrical load is 1447 kVA. The
supply will be by New Town Kolkata Electric Supply Company Limited (NTESCL). Power back-up
will be provided by the 2 no. of DG set of capacity 650 kVA each.
Solid waste generation: Estimated quantity of the waste during operation phase is 105 kg per day.
The generated waste will be treated in accordance to Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and
Handling) Rules, 2016 amended to date. Also, the local vendors will be hired to provide separate
coloured bins for dry recyclables and Bio-Degradable waste. Litter bin will also be provided in open
areas.
Bio-degradable waste will be treated in organic waste convertor and the compost produced will be
used as manure for landscaping. STP sludge and horticulture waste will be used as manure.
Recyclable wastes like paper, plastic, metals etc. will be sold off to recyclables.
Occupancy: During operation phase, approximately 474 occupants will occupy the building which
includes 292 Employees, 44 visitors, 94 guests and 44 service staff approximately.
BASELINE ENVIRONMENT STATUS

Topography
The elevation of the site varies from 0 m to 2 m above Mean Sea Level. The general slope of the site
is from West to East.
Seismology
The project site falls under seismic zone III which is a moderate damage risk zone.
Soil
 The soil is slightly alkaline, with pH ranging from 7.1 to 7.3 in the study area. The texture of
the soil is dominantly clayey loam in nature.
 The moisture content of the soil samples is found to be low and ranges from 3.35% to 4.81%.
This is due to low water holding capacity of the soil.
 Organic carbon, a major nutrient for soil fertility, was present in more than sufficient content in
the sampling locations.
 The NPK content was found to be good for growth of plants
Air Environment
The air quality monitoring has been conducted for 7 sites in and around the project site.

Particulate Matter (PM10 & PM2.5): Maximum concentration of PM10 was recorded at AAQ5 - BF
Block (184.5 μg/m3) while the minimum concentration was recorded in AAQ2 - Thakdari (103.1
μg/m3). PM2.5 ranges between 55.3 μg/m3 in AAQ2 to 71.7 μg/m3 in AAQ5. The values recorded for
both the parameters were higher than stipulated standard except PM2.5 value at Thakdari.
The higher concentration of PM10 & PM2.5 in AAQ4 may be attributed to its proximity to major roads
and high vehicular movement.
Sulphur Dioxide (SOx) & Nitrogen Dioxide (NOx):. The SOx concentration ranges from 12.8 μg/m3
in AAQ2 to 16.8 μg/m3 at AAQ5. The anthropogenic sources for SO2 emissions are high vehicular
movement.
Concentration of NOx also follows similar trend with the highest being recorded in AAQ5 (41.8
μg/m3) and lowest at AAQ2 (27.7 μg/m3). The values, however, are well within the NAAQ standard.
Carbon Monoxide (CO): Anthropogenic emissions of carbon monoxide originate mainly from
incomplete combustion of carbonaceous materials like coal, oil, etc. Also the largest proportions of
these emissions are produced as exhausts of internal combustion engines, especially by motor
vehicles. The minimum value 0.95 mg/m3 of CO was observed in AB Block and Krishna Nagar
while the maximum value, 1.25 mg/m3 was observed at BF Block. The values observed were well
below the NAAQ standard of 2 mg/m3 for 8 hourly sampling.
Noise Level
The noise quality has been monitored for 7 sites in and around the project site. The major source of
the noise level fluctuation in daytime and night time was observed majorly due to the vehicular
movement. The maximum noise level in daytime observed was 62.6 dB(A) near project site and
minimum noise level observed was 53.9 dB(A) at Krishna nagar. The maximum noise level in night
time observed was 51.5 dB(A) near Project Site while minimum noise level was 42.7 dB(A) at
Krishna Nagar.
Surface and Ground Water

The surface water samples were collected from three locations. Summary of the water quality is
given below.
 The analysis results indicate that the pH values of all the samples are in the range of 7.3 to 7.7.
 TDS was observed in the range of 300 mg/l at SW3 (Waterbody at BB Block) to 600 mg/l at
SW2 (Kestopur Khal near Loha Pool). DO was found to be in the range of 0.99 to 5.3 mg/l.
 The chloride and sulphate were found to be in the range of 68.5 mg/l at SW3 (Waterbody at
BB Block) to 138.5 mg/l SW2 (Keshtopur Khal near Loha pool) and 25.3 mg/l at SW3
(Waterbody at BB Block)) to 74.1 mg/l SW2 (Keshtopur Khal near Loha pool) respectively.

 In the study area BOD concentration varies between 4.6 mg/l at SW3 to 17.6 mg/l at SW2.
BOD tests measures only biodegradable fraction of the total potential DO consumption of a
water sample.
Ground water is collected from 3 locations. The analysis result is given below:
 The analysis results indicate that the pH of the samples ranges in between 7.5 to 7.9 in the
collected water samples which do not exceed the recommended limit (6.5 - 8.5) of BIS.
 The maximum total hardness in groundwater found to be 265.9 mg/l in sample at GW3
(Mohishgot) and the minimum was observed as 212.2 mg/l in the sample at GW1 (Project
Site).The hardness was found to be within the permissible limit of 600 mg/l as per IS
10500:2012.
 The chloride concentration recorded from the ground water samples ranged from 53.7 mg/l
(Project site) to 81.0 mg/l (Mohishgot). All the samples are within the Acceptable Limit of 250
mg/l prescribed by BIS for drinking water.
 Sulphate concentration was found in the range of 22 mg/l (Project site) to 39 mg/l (Mohishgot).
The BIS acceptable limit for sulphate in drinking water is 200 mg/l.
Environment Sensitivity
There are presence of Protected Forests, Reserve Forest and a Wildlife Sanctuary within 15 km
radius of the project site. East Calcutta Wetlands is located at a distance of 1.5km in SSW direction.
The nearest water body is the Bagiola Khal at a distance of 0.5 km and Hoogly River is situated at
the distance of 9.4km in NW direction.
ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES

The environmental impacts were identified and the potential impacts on different environmental
components due operation of the project were predicted.
Impacts & Mitigation Measures during Operation phase:

Air Quality: During the operation phase of the project, the major impact will be from DG set. The
air pollutants of concern from the DG Sets emissions are Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), un-burnt Carbon
(CO) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NO2) as per CPCB guidelines.
Mitigation Measures:
 DG set stack height will be as per CPCB guidelines.
 Low Sulphur Diesel will be used for DG Sets.
 DG sets will be operated during Power failure.
 Stack monitoring facility will be provided to all the stacks for regular monitoring.

Land-Use: The land parcel where the project is developed is allotted for commercial development
by West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited. Land-use of the project
site is as per the master plan. Moreover, the site had no trees which required tree felling. The site was
a vacant land and did not require shifting of any utilities or infrastructure.
Water Quality: During operation phase, the fresh water required shall be supplied by New Town
Kolkata Development Authority and hence impact on ground water is not anticipated.
Run-off from DG set fuel storage area and storage area of used DG set oil can either leach into
ground water or can contaminate storm water run-off which can pollute nearby water sources.
 Proper oil & grease interceptors will be installed at wastewater outlet.
 STP would be installed on the project site. The wastewater will be treated in the proposed STP
using MBBR technology.
 Rainwater harvesting shall be carried out in pit size of 350m3 to reuse or recharge ground
water.
Noise Quality: The major sources of noise during the operational phase are:
 DG sets, compressor
 Vehicular traffic
The sound pressure level generated decreases with increase in distance from the source due to wave
divergence. An additional decrease in sound pressure level with distance from the source is expected,
due to atmospheric effect or its interaction with objects in the transmission path. During the
operational stage, DG sets, cooling towers, pumps and vehicles are the major source of noise
pollution.
The DG sets will be used during power failure for controlling emergency operations. The project
proponent will use silent DG sets, with built in acoustic enclosure.
 Periodic monitoring of ambient noise level will be done as per CPCB guidelines.
 Proper maintenance of all equipment’s/machines will be carried out which will help in
reducing noise during operations.
 Additional plantation will be taken up along the periphery of the project. The plantation will
not only minimize propagation of noise but will also arrest dust.
 Ear plugs will be provided to personnel working in high noise generating zones.
 DG set shall be provided with acoustic enclosures and anti-vibrating pads.

Solid Waste: The total solid waste generation during operation phase will be 105 kg per day. The
solid waste will comprise of biodegradable waste e.g. domestic waste, food waste, horticultural
waste etc. and recyclable waste, like plastic, paper, tin, glass etc.
Different coloured bins will be used for collection of biodegradable and non-biodegradable waste as
per MSW Rules, 2016. Also, the local vendors will be hired to provide separate coloured bins for dry
recyclables and Bio-Degradable waste. Litter bin will also be provided in open areas.
The biodegradable portion of MSW will be treated at site by an Organic Waste Converter and
manure generated will be used for plantation.
The non-biodegradable fraction like plastic, tin, glass etc. will be sold to local recyclers.
Horticultural waste shall be collected and disposed-off with biodegradable waste. Rest inert MSW
will be handed over to Municipal Corporation for final disposal. Used oil generated from DG sets
will be stored in HDPE drums and sold to authorized vendors.
Ecological Management: There is no National Parks or Wildlife Sanctuaries within the study area.
The project site have 4149m2 i.e. 20.50% of total plot area as plantation area. In addition 2225.85 m2
(11%) of green area will be developed and maintained.
Around 2701 plants are already planted within project site and additional plantation will be carried
out to increase the greenbelt coverage within the project site.
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
Selection of Alternative Project Site
As the construction of the project has already completed, it was not possible to analyse any
alternative site for the project. The project site, however, seems to be suitable from the following
point of view:
 There are no national parks/wildlife sanctuaries within 10 km radius of the project site.
 The site is not a forest land or is not occupied by any water body.
 Easy access due to presence of major roads nearby.
Selection of Sewage Treatment Technology
Many technological alternatives for wastewater treatment are available, ranging from advanced
technologies to conventional treatment options. Many factors, such as capital costs, operation and
maintenance costs and land requirement, are involved in the decision-making process. After detailed
evaluation, MBBR technology has been selected for proposed STP plant. The technology offers
various advantages, which are mentioned below:
 It provides primary, secondary and tertiary treatment all in one unit; in a single evergreen
facility open to atmosphere;

 It is very simple to operate, maintain;
 It does not require skilled man-power;

 It is cost competitive particularly with reference to O&M cost;
 No pre-treatment and no chemical usage;

 Absence of any moving part;
 Odour-free; and
 Low energy requirement etc.
ENVIRONMENT MONITORING PLAN

The purpose of the monitoring programme is to ensure that the intended environmental measures are
achieved. To ensure proper implementation of the Environment Management Plan (EMP), it is
essential that an effective monitoring programme is designed and carried out during operation. The
broad objectives of the environment monitoring programme are
 To monitor impacts on the surrounding environment and the effectiveness of mitigation measures
during the operation.
 To ensure that the environmental control systems are operating satisfactorily.
 To suggest ongoing improvements in management plan, if required, for subsequent effective

monitoring.
The annual Environment Monitoring Cost during Operation Phase is INR 6.90 Lakhs and capital
cost is INR 3.50 Lakhs.
RISK ASSESSMENT & DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Building & Construction projects normally do not pose a threat to people’s lives. However due care
shall be taken to minimize all possible causes. Risk may arise from HSD, transformer & DG sets and
switchyard control room resulting in mainly fire and explosion.
The disaster management plan was prepared following all safety norms. Adequate fire control
system, personal protective equipments, an emergency response plan to address natural as well as
man-made disaster has been put in place to take care of the same.
PROJECT BENEFITS
The project have all kinds of facilities within the project to make it self-sufficient. There will be
improvement in social infrastructure by providing additional employment opportunities to the skilled
as well as unskilled people. It will trigger growth in the district and in the region as the area will be
developed and will result in associated development. The planned development with modern
infrastructure facilities and source of income would improve quality of life of local community.

The project will improve the aesthetic look of the area. Also, a big investment like this helps in
overall development of any area.
The project will also lead to improvement of physical and social infrastructures in the surrounding.
Through its corporate environment responsibility, the proponent shall spend an amount of Rs. 1.74
crores for upliftment of nearby community.
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) consists of description of the administrative aspects of
ensuring that mitigative measures are implemented and their effectiveness monitored, after approval
of the EIA.
ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL DAMAGE, REMEDIATION PLAN AND

NATURAL AND COMMUNITY AUGMENTATION PLAN
For assessment of ecological damage, Google Earth’s historic images were referred to and it was
established that project area was devoid of any trees or vegetation cover before starting the
construction works.
The damaging activity for each environment parameter was assessed and remediation plan was
worked out as per which, the cost for remediation stands at Rs. 31.82 lakhs. The cost for natural
resource augmentation plan and Community resource augmentation has been worked out to be Rs.
4.25 lakhs and Rs. 11.25 lakhs respectively.

CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT CHAPTER – 1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
M/s Dongfang Electric (India) Private Limited has developed a commercial office Building cum Guest
House at New town, Rajarhat, Kolkata.
No. 583-2N-27/2018(E) dated 10th October, 2018 (refer Annex 1.1). The compliance to ToR
conditions is attached as Annex 1.2.
SIA/WB/NCP/22937/2018.
The chronology of events is summarized in Table 1.1.
Table 1-1: Project Chronology
Sl. Project Events Date Application No./File No.
No.
1. Start of Project Construction 16th April 2012 -
2. Completion of Project Construction 4th July 2016
Date of Application Submission to MoEF&CC
3. 28th August 2017 IA/WB/NCP/67739/2017
under Violation Window

DONGFANG ELECTRIC (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED GREENCINDIA CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED 1-1
Sl. Project Events Date Application No./File No.

No.
Transfer of proposal from MoEF&CC to WB
4. 28th March 2018 SIA/WB/NCP/22937/2018
SEAC
5. Date of grant of ToR from WB SEAC 10th October 2018 Memo No. 583-2N-27/2018(E)
Source: Dongfang Electric (India) Private Limited
1.2 PROJECT PROPONENT

Dongfang Electric Corporation Limited, the largest producer of power generation equipment in
China has got the unprecedented record in the world for One Corporation with its total annual
output of complete sets of power generation equipment over 30,000 MW in 2007.
The company has already bagged orders for supply of more than 35,000 MW of generating
equipment’s in India. It has now taken the lead in setting up a subsidiary company at Kolkata, India,
to provide better services to its clients in India. The company is recognised by the name of
"Dongfang Electric (India) Private limited".
With the formation of the new company in India, DEC China and its Indian Clients has entered into
a new era, which will definitely contribute to the fast development of power projects in India.
1.3 PROJECT LOCATION

The project is a “commercial office cum Guest house” located in Village – Mahishghat, New Town,
Rajarhat, Kolkata. The project occupies a land parcel of 2.0235 ha and have a total built-up area of
22,100.2 m2.
The site of the project is located at latitude 22º34'56.75’’ N and longitude of 88º27'20.57” E.
The description of the project site is given in Table 1.2. The location of the project site is shown in
Figure 1.1. The site superimposed on toposheet and co-ordinate map is provided in Figure 1.2 and
1.3 respectively.
Table 1-2: Details of Site Location
Description Details
Project Site New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata
Khasra No. AH-5, Mar: -16-1111, Mahishghat
Coordinates of area involving Points Latitude Longitude
expansion A 22°34'58.70"N 88°27'18.79"E
B 22°34'59.10"N 88°27'19.40"E
C 22°34'58.59"N 88°27'24.54"E
D 22°34'54.91"N 88°27'23.54"E
E 22°34'55.14"N 88°27'21.97"E
F 22°34'54.03"N 88°27'21.78"E
G 22°34'54.03"N 88°27'18.36"E
Access Road Arterial Road Adjacent S
Nearest city Kolkata 9.0 km WSW
Nearest Railway Station Sealdah Railway Station 8.8 km SW

Netaji Subash Chandra
Nearest Airport 7.7 km NNW
International Airport
Source: Google Imagery, 2018
1.4 NEED OF THE PROJECT

The project have all kinds of facilities within the project to make it self-sufficient. The construction
of the complex lead to increased employment opportunities as both skilled and unskilled labours was
required during construction phase.
It will trigger growth in the district and in the region as the complex will result in associated
development. The planned development with modern infrastructure facilities and source of income
would improve quality of life of local community.
overall development of the country.
1.5 THE STUDY

As per the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification dated 14th September 2006 and
subsequent amendments, projects under activity 8(a) do not require preparation of the EIA report.
But since the project is a violation case and as per MoEF&CC’s S.0.804 (E) dated 14th March 2017,
projects under violation category will be prescribed appropriate Terms of Reference for undertaking
Environment Impact Assessment and preparation of Environment Management Plan. The EIA report
shall also include preparation of an independent chapter on assessment of ecological damage,
remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan.
The baseline monitoring study has been carried out during pre-monsoon season (March to May) of
2018 to assess the environmental quality for air, water, noise and soil at the project site and the
anticipated impacts of the project on the environment. The measures for mitigation and to minimize
the impact of environmental pollution are also discussed in the report.
1.5.1 The Process

The environmental clearance process comprises of a maximum of four stages. The four stages in
sequential order are as given below:
Stage 1 - Screening: It refers to the definite assignment of environmental category to projects or
activities where the same is not completely specified. The project, although falls under 8(a) category,
it shall require to fulfill the criteria for violation projects as per MoEF&CC’s notification dated 14 th
March, 2017.
Stage 2 - Scoping: It refers to the process where EAC or SEAC determines detailed and
comprehensive Terms of Reference (TOR) for the preparation of EIA report. The scoping stage of
this project has been completed and terms of reference was awarded on 10th October, 2018.
Stage 3 - Public Consultation: The project does not involve Public Hearing.

Stage 4 - Appraisal: This refers to detailed scrutiny of the application and appraisal of the final EIA
report by EAC/SEAC to make categorical recommendations to the regulatory authority.
1.5.2 Regulatory Compliance Requirement

The environmental regulations, legislations and policy guidelines and control that may impact the
project are the responsibility of a variety of Government agencies. The principal environment
regulatory agency in India is the MoEF&CC, Government of India. MoEF&CC formulates
environmental policies and also accords environmental clearance for different category projects.
These legal enactments can be broadly classified in the terms of focus areas, viz. pollution, natural
resources and linkages between pollution and natural resources. The relevant standards, which are of
significance to the project, are given in Annex 1.3. The important environment legislations related to
environmental clearance for the project are briefly described in Table 1.3.
Table 1-3: Key Environmental Legislations in India
Operational
Name Scope and objectives Key Areas Applicability
Agencies
Wildlife To provide for Wildlife protection Chief Conservator This act is
Protection Act protection of wild in forest areas Wildlife, State applicable in
1972 animals, birds and Forest Department case any
plants; and for matters National Park or
connected therewith. Wildlife
Sanctuary is
present within 10
km radius of the
project site.
However, there
are no wildlife
Sanctuaries or
National Parks
within 10 km of
the project site.
Water (Prevention To provide for Control of sewage State Pollution Consent to
and Control of prevention & control of and industrial Control Boards Establish &
Pollution) Act water pollution and effluent Consent to
1974 enhancing water quality discharges Operate required
to be obtained
under this Act
Air (Prevention To provide for the Control emission of State Pollution Consent to
and Control of prevention and control air pollutants Control Boards Establish &
Pollution), Act of air pollution Consent to
1981 Operate required
to be obtained
under this Act
Construction & To promote an Management of Local Authority & These Rules are
Demolition Waste integrated approach, construction & State Pollution applicable as the
management whereby environmental demolition waste Control Board project involved
Rules, 2016 management of large extent of
construction and construction
demolition waste is activities.

Operational
Name Scope and objectives Key Areas Applicability
Agencies
given due consideration
throughout the duration
of the project;
Solid Waste For segregation and Management of State Pollution Applicable as the
Management storage of waste Municipal Solid Control Board project will
Rules, 2016 generated under three Waste generate different
streams namely bio- kinds of
degradable, non- municipal solid
biodegradable and waste
domestic hazardous
wastes in suitable bins
and segregated wastes
to authorised waste
pickers or waste
collectors as per the
direction or notification
by the local authorities
from time to time
1.6 STRUCTURE OF THE EIA REPORT

The overall contents of the EIA report follow the list of contents prescribed in the Gazette
Notification on “Environmental Clearance” issued by MoEF&CC vide no. S.O 1533 dated 14th
September 2006 amended to date. The report consists of twelve chapters, including the present
chapter. The content of the report is briefly described below.
Chapter-1: Introduction: This chapter gives the basic information about the project and project
area. It also discusses the justification of the project and the purpose of the EIA study including the
scope of the study.
Chapter-2: Project Description: This chapter discusses the layout drawing and design
considerations for the project. The requirements of the project including water, land etc. are also
discussed in this chapter.
Chapter-3: Description of Environment: This chapter discusses the baseline value of various
environmental components, as identified in the ToR and scope of the study.
Chapter-4: Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures: This chapter provides
the details of the Environmental Impact Assessment of the project during construction and operation
stages. It ascertains the impacts of the project on various components of the environment along with
suggestive mitigation measures. The mathematical modelling exercises have also been presented in
this chapter for prediction of air and noise quality.
Chapter 5 - Analysis of Alternatives (Technology & Site): This chapter describes systematic
comparisons of feasible alternatives for the project site, technology, and operational alternatives.

Chapter 6 - Environment Monitoring Program: The technical aspects of monitoring including
measurement methodologies, frequency, location, data analysis, detailed budget are discussed in this
chapter.
Chapter 7 - Additional Studies: A summary of the additional studies/activities conducted as per the
requirements of the ToR is given in this chapter. Risk assessment and disaster management plan for
construction projects have also been analysed in this chapter.
Chapter 8 - Project Benefits: The benefits that will be accrued from the project in the locality in
particular and society in general as well as development will be identified and described in this
chapter.
Chapter 9 - Environment Cost Benefit Analysis: The chapter comprehensively analyse

Environmental Cost Benefit Analysis of the projects, if recommended at Scoping Stage.
Chapter 10 - Environmental Management Plan: This chapter comprehensively presents the

Environmental Management Plan (EMP), which includes the administrative and technical setup,
summary matrix of EMP, the cost involved to implement the EMP, both during the construction and
operational phase and provisions made towards the same in the cost estimates of project construction
and operation.
Chapter 11- Summary & Conclusion: This chapter summarizes the findings of the study and gives
a brief of the environmental suitability of the project.
Chapter 12 - Disclosure of the Consultants Engaged: The detailed profile of the consultants along
with their capabilities, professional expertise and work experiences are highlighted in this chapter.
Chapter 13 - Ecological damage, Assessment, Remediation plan, Natural and community

resources augmentation plan: This chapter shall elaborate the impact due to unscientific measures
and the absence of EMP undertaken if any. Measurable impacts will be ascertained in this chapter
with the extent of damage done along with the financial liabilities to bridge the gap of stipulated
environmental norms.

MAPS
Key Map of West Bengal
Dongfang Electrict (India) Pvt Ltd

Project Site
Scale: Not to Scale

Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/
West_Bengal_Election_2011.svg/2000px-West_Bengal_Election_2011.svg.png
Legend
Project Site
Settlements
Streams
Roads
Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/West_Bengal_Election_2011.svg/2000px-
Source: http://www.india-in-your-home.com/physical-map-of-india.html
West_Bengal_Election_2011.svg.png Forest
Scale: Not to Scale
Scale: Not to Scale
Waterbody
A Map of India B State of West Bengal, India Vegetation
Contours
Locations
Source:
1. SoI Toposheet No. 79B/6, 79B/7, 79B/10 & 79B/11
2. Project Layout Plan, DEIPL
Project Site 3. Data Provided by FAE (LU)
4. Google Satellite Imagery, 2016
Software Used:
1. ArcGIS 10.1, 2. AutoCAD 2012, 3. ER Mapper 7, 4. Erdas Imagine 10
Figure 1.1 : Location of the Project Site
Project:
New Town, District: Kolkata, West Bengal
Project Proponent:
Environment Consultant:
GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited
1. Project Layout Plan, Smt. AM
2. Google Satellite Imagery, 2016 Source: http://www.onefivenine.com/images/DistrictMaps/585.jpg
(An ISO:9001 QMS, ISO: 14001 EMS & OHSAS: 18001 H&S MS Certified by BSI)
Scale: Not to Scale
QCI-NABET Accrediate Environment Consultant Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA0058

D Project Site C Kolkata District, West Bengal
Graphic Scale:
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 m
Drafted By: Checked By: Approved By:
A B C D Date 24/08/2017
Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2017 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp\Location Map.mxd
Project Site
Figure 1.2
Toposheet No. 79/B6
Project:
0 300 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 m
88°27'0"E 88°27'30"E Key Map of West Bengal

Project Site
Scale: Not to Scale

Legend
Project Site
0.5km Buffer
22°35'0"N
0.5km
22°35'0"N
B
A C
E
G
D Source:
F 1. SoI Toposheet No. 79B/6, 79B/7, 79B/10 & 79B/11
3. Data Provided by FAE (LU)
Software Used:
Figure 1.3: Co-ordinates of the Project Site
Project:
Project Proponent:
Points Latitude Longitude (An ISO:9001 QMS, ISO: 14001 EMS & OHSAS: 18001 H&S MS Certified by BSI)
A 22°34'58.70"N 88°27'18.79"E
Graphic Scale:
B 22°34'59.10"N 88°27'19.40"E 0 45 90 180 270 360 m
C 22°34'58.59"N 88°27'24.54"E
D 22°34'54.91"N 88°27'23.54"E Drafted By: Checked By: Approved By:
E 22°34'55.14"N 88°27'21.97"E
F 22°34'54.03"N 88°27'21.78"E
G 22°34'54.77"N 88°27'18.36"E
Date 24/08/2017
88°27'0"E 88°27'30"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2017 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp\Co-ordinate Map1.mxd
CHAPTER 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The details given in this chapter show the activities that have been undertaken during the project
cycle. The planning considered is also detailed out in this chapter including site connectivity, various
technologies involved for designing the project and various other requirements.
2.2 PROJECT FEATURES

The area of the land parcel is 20,235 m2 (2.0235 ha) and total built up is 22,100.2 m2. The total
permissible ground coverage is 4047 m2.
The Project is a Commercial Building of Dongfang Electric (India) Private Limited and comprises of
2 Blocks - A & B.
Block A consist of Tower A (Front wing; having basement, ground floor and 6 floors) & Tower B
(Rear wing having Basement, Ground Floor and 7 floors connected with common corridor) and
Block B is a Guest house comprising of 3 floors. The project is also having a cafeteria within its
premises.
The Table 2.1 summarises the break-up of the land area.
Table 2-1: Area Statement
Sl. No. Description Units Area (m2) Area (%)
A Permissible Ground Coverage m2 4047 -
B Proposed Ground Coverage m2 3800.81 -
1 Ground Coverage in Block A & B m2 3076.4 15.20

2 Green area m2 2225.85 11.00
3 Plantation m2 4149 20.50
4 Area under Road m2 3702 18.30
5 Area under pavement m2 2098.44 10.37
6 Area under open parking m2 4085 20.19
7 Area under services m2 155.96 0.77
8 Drainage m2 392.35 1.94
9 RWH m2 350 1.73
Total Plot Area m2 20,235 100.00
Source: Dongfang Electric (India) Private Limited
2.3 PROJECT CONNECTIVITY

Arterial Road is running adjacent to the project site in Southern Direction. The site is well connected
by NH-34 which is 10.54 km from the project site in North West direction and SH-1 & SH-3 at a
distance of 5.86 km in WNW direction. The nearest railway station is Sealdah Railway Station at a
distance of 8.8 km site in SW direction while the nearest airport is Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose
International Airport at a distance of 7.7 km in NNW direction. The surrounding features of the
project site are presented in Table 2-2.

Table 2-2: Features within 2 km Radius
Distance
S. No. Surrounding Features Direction
(in Km)
Settlements
1 Mohishgot 0.77 SW
2 Tarulia 1.74 NW
3 Kishanagar 1.37 SW
4 Dhapa Manpur 1.95 SE
5 Ghuni 1.73 NNE
6 Halder Bati 1.69 N
7 Gobinda Nagar 1.86 NW
Institute
1 Nalanda hotel Management College 1.56 WNW
2 IIPM, Kolkata 1.55 WSW
Source: Google Imagery, 2018
2.4 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS

2.4.1 Land Requirement
The land parcel where the project is developed is allotted for commercial development by West
Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited. The land documents are attached
as Annex 2.1. The Master Plan is given in Annex 2.2.
2.4.2 Parking Facility

The project has facilities for basement and open parking. Parking facilities are provided for 260 ECS
with addition 4 bus parking facility. Parking requirement is shown in Table 2.3.
Table 2-3: Parking Requirement
Location No. of Car Parking No. of Bus Parking
Open 197 4
Basement 63 -
Total Parking 260 4
2.4.3 Power Requirement
The total power requirement of the project is 1447 kVA. The power is supplied by New Town
Kolkata Electric Supply Company Limited (NTESCL) (Annex 2.3). There is provision of 2 DG Sets
of 650 kVA each for power back-up at the time of power failure.
Also, solar power facilities will be provided within the project site which will be 15.4 kVA i.e.1.2%
of the total connected load. The Roof Layout Plan showing the location of Solar Panels is attached as
Annex 2.4.
2.4.4 Water Requirement
The total water requirement during operation phase will be 79 KLD of which 50 KLD will be fresh
water requirement while 29 KLD of treated water shall be required for flushing, landscaping and
miscellaneous use. The water will be supplied by New Town Kolkata Development Authority.

(Annex 2.5). The break-up of water requirement and wastewater generation is given in Table 2.4.
The water balance diagram is given in Figure 2.1.
Wastewater Generation
Currently there is no STP at the project site and the wastewater is being treated at central level STP
of New Town Kolkata Development Authority. In future, an STP of 40 KLD based on MBBR
technology will be installed within the project site for treatment of estimated 33 KLD of generated
wastewater.
Table 2-4: Break-up of Water Requirement during Operation Phase
Generation (KLD)
Requirement
Requirement
Non-Potable
Potable
Wastewater
Description
Water
Quantity
S. No.
Unit
Unit (KLD) (KLD)
A. Office occupants Persons 337 LPCD 45 15.17 11.37 3.79 12.51

B. Visitors Persons 44 LPCD 7 0.31 0.23 0.08 0.25
C. Maintenance Staff Persons 44 LPCD 45 1.98 1.49 0.50 1.63
D. Guest House Persons 94 LPCD 180 16.92 12.69 4.23 13.96
Ltrs./
E. Cafeteria / Restaurant Seats 75 70 5.25 3.94 1.31 4.33
seat
Sub-Total (KLD) 29.72 9.91 32.69
F. Cooling Tower TR 660 Ltrs./TR 12 7.92 7.92 0.00 0
Green Belt &
G. m2 6374.85 Ltrs./m2 5 31.87 12.37 19.50 0
Landscape
Total Water Demand in KLD 79.42 50.01 29.4 32.69

DONGFANG ELECTRIC (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED CHAPTER – 2
EIA REPORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Figure 2.1: Water Balance Diagram

Sewage Treatment Plant
The proposed STP of 40 KL will be based on MBBR technology.
MBBR technology
MBBR treatment system is based on the aeration system in which the screened raw sewage is
allowed to develop the required bacterial growth in a reactor/ Aeration tank. The tank is filled with
specially developed propriety high quality plastic media which is in the form of corrugated sheets
and configured as per BOD load to be treated as per manufacturer’s recommendation. The plastic
media which has been specially developed by the industry for such applications offers a large surface
area as compared to conventional surface aerator or diffused aeration system. The media with
provides large surfaces areas, provides efficiency in the treatment process and enable large bacterial
flocks developed in the aeration to stick to the media and assist rapid aeration of the entire mess of
liquid. Retention of the flocks (Sludge) by the media reduces the sludge volume. The volume of
sludge developed in the process is in low and reduces pumping and handling problems. The mixed
liquor then separates the sludge and the effluent in a separate a gravity settling tank. Although the
quantity of sludge is less in volume it to be disposed-off in a neat and hygienic manner and disposed-
off in a designated location.
 Raw sewage from main sewer line will be collected through pipes via gravity into the screen
chamber. This manually cleaned screen will be provided to remove floating and big size
particles which may otherwise choke the pumps and pipe lines.

 After screening, the waste water will be allowed to pass through another screen to remove the
grit material. The screens and grease trap shall be accessible so that they may be manually
cleaned from time to time.
 The screened and waste water should then pass into the equalization tank to homogenize the
waste water quality and also even out flow fluctuations and feed waste water of uniform quality
at constant rate to subsequent treatment units. Air mixing should be provided to mix the contents
of the equalization tank. A coarse bubble aeration grid shall be provided to mix the contents of
the equalization tank and also to avoid septic conditions in the tank.
 From the equalization tank the wastewater will be pumped into anoxic Tank. By-pass line shall
be provided from the pumping system which shall only be provisional for disposal of sewage to
mobile sewage tanker for emergency purposes.
 From the anoxic tank the wastewater will be overflowed into MBBR Tank.
 The MBBR process uses small plastic carrier elements to provide growth sites for bacteria
attachment in a suspended growth medium. The carrier elements shall allow a higher biomass
concentration to be maintained in the reactor. This shall increase the biological treatment
capacity for the given reactor volume.
 The carrier elements shall be continuously kept in suspension by the aeration system. The
agitation pattern in the reactor shall be designed to provide an upward movement of the carriers
across the surface of the retention screen which creates a scrubbing effect to prevent clogging.
Combination of fine & coarse bubbles may be provided to provide oxygen as per detailing.
 From the MBBR tank mixed liquor shall flow by gravity into the secondary settling tank. The
solids will settle in the tank. The sludge that settles down shall be transferred to sludge holding
tank via sludge loading pumps, with provision of sludge return to the bioreactor if necessary.
 From the settling tank, treated wastewater will flow into chlorine contact tank. In this tank,
chlorine will be added in the form of calcium or sodium hypochlorite solution by a suitable
chlorinator/Dosing system.
 Treated water after chlorine contact tank shall be clear, odourless, low BOD, low suspended
solids, which shall be of quality which is acceptable as per standards prescribed by
CPCB/Environmental norms.
 The treated water from chlorine contact tank is fed by means of filter/softener feed pump sets to
pass through dual media filters, activated carbon filters and softeners and stored in the treated
water and soft water storage tanks. The activated carbon filters shall ensure removal of all
coloration and odours present in the treated effluent. The soft water shall be of Zero Commercial
Hardness. Backwash of Filters and regeneration of softeners shall be done intermittently as per
requirements.
 The filtered, clean and odorless water from treated water tank is then fed through a variable
frequency drive hydro-pneumatic system to the external treated effluent rings as per the site

plan, from where connections are taken to the garden hydrant system and to each unit for
flushing water as per detailing.
 The softened, clean and odourless water from soft water tank is then fed to HVAC Plant Room
by a separate variable frequency drive hydro-pneumatic system.
 According to the guide lines of Ministry of Environment and Forest the UV system will be
provided on the discharge point of treated effluent supply lines to ensure 100% pathogen free
treated water for recycling and re-use. The UV system shall be provided as online installation on
the treated water supply line being supplied to the external distribution ring.
 Excess sludge from the secondary settling tank will be taken periodically into sludge holding
tank. In this tank sludge will be aerated for self-stabilization. Air will be shut off periodically
and superannuate water will be transferred to the aeration tank creating stabilized sludge. The
final sludge shall be de-watered through a centrifuge mechanism. Sludge loading arrangements
shall also be provided for direct disposal of sludge to sludge tankers / trolleys.
The inlet & outlet sewage characteristics are given in Table 2.5.
Table 2-5: Inlet & Outlet Sewage Characteristics
Influent Waste water Characteristics
pH 7.15 to 8.2
Color Mild
Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 250 to 350
BOD (mg/l) 200 to 250
COD (mg/l) 300 to 400
Oil & Grease (mg/l) 10-50
Desired Treated Effluent Characteristics After Secondary Treatment
pH 7.2 to 7.8
Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) 25 to 30
BOD (mg/l) 20 to 30
COD (mg/l) 50 to 100
Oil & Grease (mg/l) <10
Desired Effluent Characteristics After Tertiary Treatment
pH 7.1 to 7.3
Total Suspended Solids (mg/l) <20
BOD (mg/l) <10
COD (mg/l) <50
Oil & Grease (mg/l) <2
NH4-N (mg/l) 5
N-total (mg/l) 10
Faecal Coliform (MPN/100 ml) <100
2.5 SOLID WASTE GENERATION
During the operation phase, waste will comprise of Institutional, horticulture and street sweeping
waste. Estimated quantity of the waste during operation phase is 105 kg per day. The breakup of
solid waste generation is given in Table 2.6.

Table 2-6: Solid Waste Generation
S. No of Waste Generation per Waste generated
Category Unit
No. Person/Area capita (kg/capita/day) (kg/day)
1. Institutional Waste 474 Persons 0.2kg/p/day 94.8
2
2. Horticulture waste 6374.85 Area 0.001kg/m /month 6
3. Street Sweeping 3702 Area 0.2kg/m2/day 3.70
Total Solid Waste Generated 105
Source: For Waste Collection, Chapter 3, Table 3.6, Page no. 49, Central Public Health & Environment Engineering Organization,
Ministry of Urban Development, (Government of India, May 2000)
Table 2-7: Composition of Waste
S. No Type of Waste Quantity of Waste (Kg/day)
1 Bio-degradable (60% of Total Waste) 63
2 Recyclable (30% of Total Waste) 31.5
3 Inert-Waste (10% of Total Waste) 10.5
Handling) Rules, 2016 amended to date. The waste will be collected and disposed by New Town
Kolkata Development Authority. (Annex 2.6). The local vendors will be hired to provide separate
areas.
2.6 OCCUPANCY
During operation phase, approximately 474 occupants will occupy the building which includes 292
Employees, 44 visitors, 94 guests and 44 service staff approximately.
2.7 PROJECT COST
The estimated project cost is Rs. 116.01 Crores.

CHAPTER 3
DESCRIPTION OF THE
ENVIRONMENT
3. BASELINE ENVIRONMENT
3.1 LOCATION OF THE PROJECT
The project site is located at Village – Mahishghat, New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata and lies at latitude
22º34'56.75’ N and longitude of 88º27'20.57” E. The nearest city is Kolkata at a distance of 9 km in
WSW direction. Sealdah Railway Station is the nearest Rail head at a distance of 8.8km in SW
direction. The site is 7.7km, NNW to Netaji Subash Chandra International Airport.
There is presence of Protected Forests, Reserve Forest and a Wildlife Sanctuary within 15 km radius
of the project site. East Calcutta Wetlands lie at a distance of 1.5km, SSW from the project site.
3.2 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

In order to predict anticipated environment impact of any project, it is necessary to obtain
information of the existing conditions. The assessment of baseline environment and the anticipated
impacts are the basis for preparation of the environmental management plan.
For baseline data collection, an area covering 10 km radius from the project site boundary has been
considered as the Study Area. The map of the study area is given as Figure 3.1. Baseline data for
environmental attributes like ambient air, meteorology, water, hydrology, land use, soil, geology,
noise, socio-economic, ecology and biodiversity data etc. was collected. The study was conducted
during the pre -monsoon season i.e. from March to May, 2018.
The information presented in the chapter has been collected from primary field studies, desk research
and secondary sources. The present chapter highlights various aspects of baseline data on
environmental significant parameters and its analysis in the light of the proposed construction
activity.
3.3 METHODOLOGY ADOPTED FOR STUDY

Baseline data of environmental attributes like ambient air, water, soil, meteorology, noise, ecology,
socio-economic condition are collected as per the standard and specific Terms of Reference
stipulated by MoEF&CC. The primary data are collected from site monitoring. In case primary data
is not possible to be collected due to long term data needs , the secondary data collected from
published sources and State agencies are used after validation and updated using appropriate
statistical technique prior to use. The methodology adopted for study is given in following sections.
3.3.1 Primary Data Collection

The primary data collection is a pre-requisite for an Environment Impact Assessment Study in order
to provide a description of the status and trends of environmental factors against which the predicted
changes can be compared and evaluated in terms of importance. Wherever possible, the primary data

are interpreted with site conditions and secondary data. The primary data was collected as mentioned
in Table 3.1.
Table 3-1: Primary Data Collection and Method
Sl.
Area Description Method
No.
1 Meteorology The meteorological data was An automatic meteorological station was set up at
collected for ambient project site. Cloud cover was manually observed
temperature, rainfall, relative and noted.
humidity, wind pattern
2 Ambient Air Particulate matter (PM10 & In order to assess the Ambient Air Quality
Quality PM2.5), sulphur dioxide (SO2), (AAQ), samples of ambient air were collected by
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and installation of Envirotech make Respirable Dust
Carbon monoxide (CO) Sampler BL460 (with Gaseous attachment
facility) and Envirotech make Fine Particle
Sampler APM 550 at 7 different locations and
analysed for primary air pollutants.
3 Noise Level Lday: This represents Leq of day- Noise level measurements were done at 7
time. Lday is calculated as locations in the study area at different intervals of
logarithmic average using the time for 24 hours with the help of sound level
hourly Leq for day time hours meter to establish the baseline Lday and Lnight noise
from 6.00 A.M to 10.00 P.M pressure levels in the study area.
Lnight: This represents Leq of
night-time. Lnight is calculated as
logarithmic average using the
hourly Leq for night-time hours
from 10.00 PM to 6.00 A.M.
4 Water Surface water Surface water samples were collected from 3
Quality different locations for analysis.
Ground water Ground water samples were collected from 3
different adjoining areas and analysed as per
standard APHA and IS: 3025 criteria and IS:
10500, 2012.
5 Soil Quality Physical and chemical Random soil samples were collected from 4
characteristics locations by Auger up to depth of 30 cm and
homogenized samples were analysed as per the
methods described in “Soil Chemical Analysis”
(M. L. Jackson, 1967)
6 Ecology & Inventory of flora and fauna in Floral and faunal inventory were prepared by
Biodiversity 10 km radius identifying various plants and animal species in
the study area during field visit.
7 Traffic Traffic Volume Count In 2 locations for 24 hours. The PCU per hour has
Survey been considered for peak hour.
3.3.2 Secondary Data Collection
Secondary data are those collected over the years that can be used to understand the existing
environmental scenario of the study area. The environmental impact assessment (EIA) studies are
conducted over a short period of time and therefore the understanding of the environmental trends,
based on a few months of primary data, has limitations.

Ideally, the primary data must be considered along with the secondary data for complete
understanding of the existing environmental status of the area. The secondary sources used for
reference for this project are given in Table 3.2.
Table 3-2: Secondary Data Collection
Sl.
Area Description Source Use of data
No.
1. Meteorology Temperature, IMD Station, Dum Dum The data was used for
rainfall, humidity, (Kolkata) (1971-2000). verification of data generated
seasonal wind Hourly meteorological data during the on-site monitoring
pattern, wind speed, collected during site visit. through data logger.
cloud cover,
stability, mixing
height, inversion
2. Ambient Air Hourly Ambient air quality data The data was used for
Quality concentration of reported in various EIA verification
PM10, PM2.5, SO2, Reports of nearby
NO2 and CO industries available in
MoEF&CC’s website
3. Water Quality Ground Water Water quality data reported The data was used for
in various EIA Reports of verification
nearby industries available
in MoEF&CC website and
Central Ground Water
Board- Indore District
4. Soil Quality Physical & Soil quality data reported inSoil data was verified by
chemical various EIA reports of collecting soil samples from the
characteristics nearby industries available study area which was then
in MoEF&CC website. analysed for relevant physical &
chemical characteristics.
5. Nature of Land-use Survey of India Toposheet, Data from various sources were
terrain National Remote Sensing used for verification of our data
Centre (Satellite image) after ground-truthing for
features and land-use.
6. Hydrogeology Geological Ground water brochure of The data was used for
formation and 24 North Parganas District, verification
analysis, hydro- West Bengal, before
geological analysis monsoon and after monsoon
7. Seismic Data Seismic zone, Vulnerability Atlas of India Discussion were carried out with
presence of faults, (2006) local people to verify the
thrust frequency of occurrence of
earthquake in the area
8. Biological Inventory of flora & District Forest Department Ecological data was used during
Environment fauna, endemic carrying out field survey and
species, migratory discussion with locals to
routes establish the species richness of
the area.
9. Socio- Demographic Census data (2001 & 2011) The census data was used with
economic profile, household, Data collected from district the primary data and the data
status occupation status office. collected from district office.

3.4 ECO-SENSITIVE FEATURES
radius of the project site. East Calcutta Wetland lies at a distance of 1.5km in SSW direction from
Project Site. The sensitive features are listed in Table 3.3 and shown in Figure 3.2.
Table 3-3: Sensitive Features Present in 15 km Radius of the Project Site
Features Distance (km) Direction
Water Bodies
Bidyadhari Nadi 6.5 NE
Sunti Nadi 9.5 NE
New Town Lake 1.6 NE
Bidyadhari Khal 8.5 SE
Rabindra Sarovar 12.0 SW
Salt Lake 3.5 WNW
Hoogly River 9.4 NW
Bagiola Khal 0.5 N
Eco-sensitive Area
East Calcutta Wetlands 1.5 SSW
Source: (i) Google Earth Imagery, 2017 (ii) SoI Toposheet No. 79B/6, 79B/7, 79B/10, 79B/11
3.5 VULNERABILITY OF THE SITE

3.5.1 Topography
The project site has a flat topography and elevation ranges from 0 m to 2 m above Mean Sea Level.
The slope is from West to East
The contour map and slope map is given in Figure 3.3 & Figure 3.4 respectively.

3.5.2 Seismicity
The project site falls under Zone III of the

seismic zonation map of India signifying
moderate damage risk zones (Figure 3.5)
Figure 3.5: Earthquake Hazard Map of West Bengal
3.6 GEOLOGY
The district is a part of lower Gangetic Basin and is underlain by huge thickness of Quaternary
Alluvium, laid down by the Southerly flowing Bhagirathi River and its tributaries. The major area of
the district occupied by recent Alluvium consists of grey sand, silt and grey (semiplastic) clay. Older
alluvium occurs beneath recent alluvium comprise grey to brown sand fine to coarse grained, gravel,
clay (grey to yellow) with kankar and ferruginous concretions. In northern and central part of the
district top surface clay is occurring down to 5 to 12 mbgl, whereas in Southern and south-eastern
parts of the district average thickness of top clay layer in the range of 25 mbgl.
3.7 HYDROGEOLOGY
Groundwater occurs in a thick zone of saturation in the alluvium deposited by the river system. The
sand and gravel horizons of different textures constitute main aquifers.
Groundwater in the northern and central part of the district occur under water table conditions.
However, in isolated patches in Barrackpore, Amdanga, Hadra – II and Rajarhat blocks, the top clay
and sandy clay locally thick (20-30 mt) imparting semi-confined nature to the ground waterbody.
Depth to water level in unconfined aquifers during pre-monsoon period (2006) varies from 2.00 to
13.60 mbgl whereas that to post-monsoon it is from 1.64 to 10.66 mbgl. Piezometric head in

confined aquifer during pre - monsoon period (2006) varies from 3.47 mbgl to 6.25 mbgl whereas as
that to post-monsoon period (2006) varies from 1.91 mbgl to 5.89 mbgl.
3.8 LAND-USE OF THE STUDY AREA & PROJECT SITE

The objective of assessing the land use details of the area is to know the existing land use pattern of
the area. It also enables to envisage the scenario emerging due to the increase in demand for land
with increase in population and the impacts arising due to the interface with various project
activities.
3.8.1 Land-use of the Study Area

The land-use distribution of the study area is given in Table 3.4. The land use table can be
meaningfully interpreted from the pie diagram in Figure 3.6. The land-use map of study area is
given in Figure 3.7.
Table 3-4: Land-use Pattern of Study Area
Landuse Area in acres Area in %
Built up 34490 43.7
Industries 239 0.3
Airport Area 885 1.1
Brick Kiln 186 0.2
Wooded Area 2578 3.3
Open Scrub / Park 7051 8.9
Waste Land 2406 3.0
Open Land 882 1.1
Marshy Land 2574 3.3
Water body 15000 19.0
Agriculture Land 12684 16.1
Total Area 78976 100
Source: (i) SoI Toposheet No. 46N/9, 46 N/10, 46 N/13 and 46 N/14 (ii) Google Satellite Imagery, 2017
Figure 3.6: Pie Diagram depicting Land-use Pattern of the Study Area

As observed from the graphical projection and data above, built-up area constitutes about 43.7% of
the study area as the project site is surrounded by settlements, complexes etc. followed by
waterbodies of about 19%. The rest is primarily agricultural land and open scub land constituting
16.1% and 8.9% respectively. Marshy land, waste land, wooded area, Open land, airport area,
industries, brick kiln cover 3.3%, 3.0%, 3.3%, 1.1%, 1.1%, 0.3%, 0.2% respectively of the study
area.
3.8.2 Land-use of the Project Area

The project area of 2.0235 ha is under possession of the Proponent. The construction work of the
project was started on 16th April, 2012 and was completed on 4th July 2016, without obtaining prior
environmental clearance as per EIA Notification 2006. The project have total built-up area of 22,100
m2. There is no forest land involved in the project site nor there is presence of any water
bodies/drainage channels at site.
3.9 SOIL TYPE & CHARACTERISTICS

Assessment of soil quality is an important aspect with reference to tree plantations, percolation of
water, ground water impact etc. For studying soil quality, sampling locations were selected to assess
the existing soil conditions in and around the project area. The samples are collected by ramming
core-cutter into the soil up to 30 cm depth. Four locations are selected for soil sampling. The
sampling locations are shown in Figure 3.8. The sealed samples were sent to laboratory for analysis.
The sealed samples were sent to laboratory for analysis. The soil quality as analysed from the
collected samples is given in Table 3.5.
The samples were analysed as per the standard methods prescribed in “Soil Chemical Analysis (M.L.
Jackson, 1967) and Department of Agriculture & Co-operation Ministry of Agriculture, Government
of India”. The important properties analysed for soil are bulk density, porosity, infiltration rate, pH
and organic matter, Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Phosphorous and Potassium.
Table 3-5: Soil Characteristics of the Study Area
S1 S2 S3 S4
Location Project Site Near CF Block Near AB Block Near AF Block
- 0.5 km, SE 0.68 km, NNW 0.8 km, W
Parameter Unit
Soil colour ---- Grayish Grayish Grayish Grayish
pH ---- 7.2 7.3 7.1 7.2
Electrical
µmhos /cm 330 320 353 310
Conductivity
Moisture % 4.81 3.35 4.7 3.54
Soil texture ---- Clay Loam Clay Loam Clay Loam Clay Loam
Clay % 29 33 28 39
Silt % 37 39 34 30
Sand % 34 28 38 31

S1 S2 S3 S4
Location Project Site Near CF Block Near AB Block Near AF Block
- 0.5 km, SE 0.68 km, NNW 0.8 km, W
Parameter Unit
Infiltration Rate cm/hr 1.24 1.34 1.28 1.38
Bulk density gm/cm3 1.31 1.27 1.50 1.23
Porosity % 35.00 39.00 42.00 44.00
Nitrogen kg/ha 284.0 263.0 282.0 257.0
Phosphorus kg/ha 57.1 55.7 54.2 51.7
Potassium kg/ha 328.2 321.0 336.0 341.0
Organic Carbon % 1.50 1.34 1.47 1.37
Organic matter % 2.59 2.31 2.53 2.37
Source: Sampling & Analysis by Envirotech East Private Limited, New Delhi (March to May, 2018)
Table 3-6: Standard Classification of Soil

Sl. No. Soil Test Classification
<4.5 Extremely acidic
4.51- 5.50 Very strongly acidic
5.51-6.0 moderately acidic
6.01-6.50 slightly acidic
1. pH 6.51-7.30 Neutral
7.31-7.80 slightly alkaline
7.81-8.50 moderately alkaline
8.51-9.0 strongly alkaline
9.01 very strongly alkaline
Up to 1.00 Average
Salinity Electrical Conductivity
2 1.01-2.00 harmful to germination
(µmhos/cm) (1 ppm = 640 µmho/cm)
2.01-3.00 harmful to crops (sensitive to salts)
Up to 0.2: very less
0.21-0.4: less
0.41-0.5 medium,
3 Organic Carbon
0.51-0.8: on an average sufficient
0.81-1.00: sufficient
>1.0 more than sufficient
Up to 50 very less
51-100 less
4 Nitrogen (Kg/ha) 101-150 good
151-300 Better
>300 sufficient
Up to 15 very less
16-30 less
31-50 medium,
5 Phosphorus (Kg/ha)
51-65 on an average sufficient
66-80 sufficient
>80 more than sufficient
0 -120 very less
120-180 less
181-240 medium
6 Potassium (Kg/ha)
241-300 average
301-360 better
Source: Handbook of Agriculture, Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi 1961.

3.9.1 Observation and Interpretation
Physical Parameters
 Moisture Content: Soil moisture is important for hydrological, biological and bio-geochemical
processes. Moisture content of soil samples in the study area ranges from 3.35% (S2: Near CF
Block to 4.81% (S1: Project Site)
 Texture: Soil texture describes the size (diameter) of the soil particles. Where larger mineral
particles predominate, the soil is gravelly (d > 2mm), or sandy (0.05 < d < 2); where smaller,
colloidal mineral particles are dominant, the soil is clayey (d < 0.002). Texture influences plant
growth by its direct effect on soil aeration, water infiltration, cation exchange capacity, and
erodibility. The study area was found to have mostly clayey loam texture.
 Infiltration rate: Infiltration rate is dependent on soil texture (percentage of sand, silt and clay)
and clay mineralogy. Water moves more quickly through the large pore spaces in a sandy soil
than it does through the small pores of a clayey soil, especially if the clay is compacted and has
little or no structure or aggregation. Soil organic matter affects infiltration through its positive
effect on the development of stable soil aggregates, or crumbs. Highly aggregated soil increase
pore space and infiltration. Infiltration rate in the study area ranges from 1.24 cm/hr (S1: Near
project site) to 1.38 cm/hr (S1: Near AF Block).
 Bulk Density: Bulk density is required for gaseous exchange; so that high bulk density would
pose restriction to the growth of deep rooted plants. Bulk Density of soil was found to be in the
range from 1.23 gm/cm3 (S2: Near AF Block) to 1.19 gm/cm3 (S1: project site).
 Porosity: Soil porosity attributes to the fragmentation and aggregation of the soil particles due
to vegetation development. The total pore volume of the study area varied from 21.89% (S4:
Near Mumbai-Agra Highway) to 1.50% (S3: Near AB Block).
Chemical Parameters
 pH: The pH of the soil samples vary from 7.1 (S3: Near AB Block) to 7.3 (S2: Near CF Block)
indicating slightly alkaline nature of soil.
 Electrical Conductivity: The electrical conductivity of soil is actually a measure of salinity.

Excessively high salinity can affect plants in many ways: Specific toxicity of a particular ion
(such as sodium), higher osmotic pressure around the roots prevents an efficient water
absorption by the plant. Some plants are more susceptible to the electrical conductivity than
others and each species has an electrical conductivity threshold, beyond which yield is
decreased. The electrical conductivity of the soil samples range from 310 µmhos /cm (S4: Near
AF Block) to 353 µmhos /cm (S3: Near AB Block), which as per ICAR is average to average
for growth of vegetation.

 Organic Carbon: The organic carbon in the soil samples vary between 1.34% (S2: Near CF
Block) to 1.50% (S3: Near Project Site) indicating more than sufficient content for growth of
plants as per ICAR.
 Nitrogen: The available nitrogen in the soil samples range between 257.0 kg/ha (S4: Near AF
block) to 284 kg/ha (S1: Near Project Site) which as per ICAR is good to better content for
growth of vegetation.
 Phosphorus: Phosphorus is the key content which plays an important role in the
photosynthesis, respiration, energy storage and transfer, cell division, cell enlargement and
several other properties in the living plant. Available Phosphorus in the study area range
between 51.7 kg/ha (S4: Near AF Block) to 57.1 kg/ha (S1: Project site), which as per ICAR
categorization falls in the range of ‘more than sufficient’.
 Potassium: Potassium is associated with movement of water, nutrients, and carbohydrates in

plant tissue. If potassium is deficient or not supplied in adequate amounts, growth is stunted
and yields are reduced. Potassium content in the study area varies from 321.0 kg/ha (S2: Near
CF Block) to 341 kg/ha (S2: Near AF Block) which is better for the growth of plant as per
ICAR’s classification.
Overall, the NPK content was found to be good for growth of plants. Therefore, it can be concluded
that the soil quality in terms of fertility is good for growth of vegetation.
3.10 WATER ENVIRONMENT

3.10.1 Area Drainage
In the 10 km study area of the project site, the presence of Hoogly River is distinctve. The River
flows from North to South and finally joins Bay of Bengal in South direction.
The major water bodies have been mentioned in Table 3.7. The drainage pattern map of the study
area is shown in Figure 3.9.
Table 3-7: Major Water Bodies in the Study Area
Water Bodies
Bidyadhari Nadi 6.5 NE
Sunti Nadi 9.5 NE
New Town Lake 1.6 NE
Bidyadhari Khal 8.5 SE
Rabindra Sarovar 12.0 SW
Salt Lake 3.5 WNW
Hoogly River 9.4 NW

Bagiola Khal 0.5 N
Source: SoI Toposheet Nos. 79/B6 (ii) Google Satellite Imagery 2018
3.10.2 Hydrogeology
Groundwater occurs in a thick zone of saturation in the alluvium deposited by the river system. The
sand and gravel horizons of different textures constitute main aquifers.
Groundwater in the northern and central part of the district occur under water table conditions.
However, in isolated patches in Barrackpore, Amdanga, Hadra – II and Rajarhat blocks, the top clay
and sandy clay locally thick (20-30 mt) imparting semi-confined nature to the ground waterbody.
Depth to water level in unconfined aquifers during pre-monsoon period (2006) varies from 2.00 to
13.60 mbgl whereas that to post-monsoon it is from 1.64 to 10.66 mbgl. Piezometric head in
confined aquifer during pre - monsoon period (2006) varies from 3.47 mbgl to 6.25 mbgl whereas as
that to post-monsoon period (2006) varies from 1.91 mbgl to 5.89 mbgl.
3.10.3 Water Quality

Frequency & Parameters
Water samples were collected once during the study period and analyzed for following selected
physico-chemical and biological parameters.
 Physical Parameters - pH, colour, temperature, and conductivity, TDS and turbidity, Na, & K
etc.
 Chemical parameters - Alkalinity, hardness, NO3, Cl, SO4, Ca, Mg, Phenolic compounds, DO,
BOD and COD
 Heavy metals - Cyanide, Aluminium, Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Iron, Copper, Lead,
Manganese, Zinc and Mercury
The samples for surface water quality were taken from major surface water bodies and underground
water samples were taken from hand-pumps near settlements for assessing the ground water quality.
Surface and ground water sampling was carried out at 3 locations each to get an idea about the water
quality of the study area. The water quality sampling locations are shown in Figure 3.10.
Methodology of Sampling & Analysis: Analyses of the samples were carried out as per established
standard methods and procedures prescribed by CPCB, IS 3025 Codes and APHA 22nd edition,
2012.
Samples for chemical analysis were collected in polyethylene carboys. Samples collected for metal
content were acidified with 1 ml HNO3. Physicochemical parameters like pH and conductivity were
measured on site using potable meter while for chemical (dissolved oxygen) and biochemical (BOD)
parameters water samples were fixed in 300 ml BOD bottles using MnSO4 and alkaline iodide in
field and sent to the laboratory. A separate BOD bottles with 300 ml of respective sample were sent

to the laboratory without any fixation for BOD analysis. The basic precautions were taken care to
avoid any contamination during the sampling. The methodology for sample collection and
preservation techniques was followed as per the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) mentioned in
Table 3.8.The analysis methodology is given in Table 3.9 and CPCB standard for drinking water
criteria is given in Table 3.10.
Table 3-8: Standard Operating Procedure for Water Sampling & Analysis
Sl.
Parameter Sample Collection Sample Size Storage/Preservation
No.
1 pH Grab sampling plastic/glass container 50 ml On site analysis
Electrical
2 Grab sampling plastic/glass container 50 ml On site analysis
Conductivity
Total Dissolved Refrigeration, can be
3 Grab sampling plastic/glass container 100 ml
Solids stored for 7 days
4 Residual Chlorine Grab sampling plastic/glass container 50 ml On site analysis
Add HNO3 to pH<2,
5 Hardness Grab sampling plastic/glass container 100 ml
refrigeration; 6 months
6 Chlorides Grab sampling plastic/glass container 50 ml Not required; 28 days
7 Sulphates Grab sampling plastic/glass container 100 ml Refrigeration; 28 days
8 Sodium, Potassium Plastic container 100 ml Not required; 6 months
9 Nitrates Plastic container 100 ml Refrigeration; 48 hrs
10 Fluorides Plastic container only 100 ml Not required; 28 days
11 Alkalinity Plastic/glass containers 100 ml Refrigeration; 14 days
Add H2SO4 to pH<2,
12 Ammonia Plastic/glass containers 100 ml
refrigeration, 28 days
Hexavalent Grab Sample;
13 Plastic/Glass rinse with 1+1 HNO3 100 ml
Chromium, Cr+6 refrigeration; 24 hrs
Heavy metals (Hg,
Filter, add HNO3 to pH<
14 Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Zn, Plastic/Glass rinse with 1+1 HNO3 500 ml
2; Grab sample; 6 months
Pb etc.)
Table 3-9: Analytical Procedure
Sl. No. Parameters Analytical Method Reference
1 pH pH meter IS : 3025 (Part-11)
2 Turbidity Nephelo Meter IS : 3025 (Part-10)
0
3 Conductivity (at 25 C) Conductivity meter APHA 22st edition, 2510 B:2012
4 Total Dissolve Solids Gravimetric IS : 3025 (Part-16)
5 Alkalinity as CaCO3 Titrimetrically IS : 3025 (Part-23)
7 Total Hardness as CaCO3 Titrimetrically IS : 3025 (Part-21)
8 Calcium as Ca Titrimetrically IS : 3025 (Part-40)
9 Magnesium as Mg Calculation APHA 22st edition,3500 Mg B:2012
10 Sodium Flame Photometric APHA 22ndedition, 3500 Na B:2012
11 Potassium Photometric APHA 22nd edition,3500 K- B:2012
12 Chloride as Cl Argentometric IS : 3025 (Part-32)
13 Sulphate as SO4 Turbidimetric IS : 3025 (Part-24)
14 Nitrate as NO3 Spectro photometric IS : 3025 (Part-34)
15 Phosphate Spectro-photometric IS : 3025 (Part-31)
16 Fluoride as F Ion-meter APHA 22ndedition,4500 F- D:2012
17 Phenolic compound as C6H5OH Spectro-photometric IS : 3025 (Part-43)

Sl. No. Parameters Analytical Method Reference
18 Cyanide Spectro-photometric IS : 3025 (Part-27)
19 Dissolve Oxygen Winkler Method IS:3025 (Part-38), Reaffirmed 2009
Gravimetric IS:3025 (Part 39), 1991 (Reaffirmed
20 Oil & Grease
2003)
21 Arsenic AAS IS : 3025 (Part-37)
22 Cadmium AAS IS : 3025 (Part-41)
23 Total Chromium AAS IS : 3025 (Part-52)
24 Iron AAS IS:3025 (Part-53), Reaffirmed 2009
25 Copper AAS IS : 3025 (Part-42)
26 Lead AAS IS : 3025 (Part-47)
27 Manganese AAS IS : 3025 (Part-59)
28 Mercury AAS IS : 3025 (Part-48)
29 Zinc AAS IS : 3025 (Part-49)
30 Dissolved Oxygen - IS : 3025 (Part-38) 1989 (RA-2009)
31 Chemical Oxygen Demand - IS : 3025 (Part-58) 1989 (RA-2012)
32 Biological Oxygen Demand - IS : 3025 (Part-44) 1989 (RA-2009)
33 Total Coliform MPN Method IS : 1622 : 1981
The error in ion-balance computation, considering the relationship between the total cations (Ca2+,
Mg2+, Na+, K+) and the total anions (NO3-, SO42-, HCO3- and Cl-) for each set of complete analyses of
water sample, is observed to be within the range of acceptability (±2%) used in most laboratories
(APHA 22nd ed).
Table 3-10: Water Quality Criteria as per CPCB
Designated-Best Use Class of water Criteria
A  Total Coliform Organism MPN/100ml shall be 50 or
less
Drinking Water Source without
 pH between 6.5 and 8.5
conventional treatment but after
 Dissolved Oxygen 6mg/l or more
disinfection
 Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5 days 200 C 2ml/l or
less
B  Total Coliform Organism MPN/100ml shall be 500 or
less
 pH between 6.5 and 8.5
Outdoor bathing (Organized)
less
C  Total Coliform Organism MPN/100ml shall be 5000 or
less
Drinking water source after
 pH between 6 and 9
conventional treatment and
disinfection
less
Propagation of Wildlife and D  pH between 6.5 and 8.5
Fisheries  Dissolved Oxygen 4mg/l or more

Designated-Best Use Class of water Criteria
 Free Ammonia (as N) 1.2 mg/l or less
E  pH between 6.0 and 8.5
 Electrical Conductivity at 250 C micro mhos/cm Max.
Irrigation, Industrial Cooling,
2250
Controlled Waste disposal
 Sodium absorption Ratio Max. 26
 Boron Max. 2mg/l
Below-E Not meeting A, B, C, D & E Criteria
3.10.3.1 Analysis of Surface Water Quality

The surface water quality as analysed is given in Table 3.11.
Table 3-11: Surface Water Quality in Study Area
SW1 SW 2 SW3
Sl. Project Site – Kestopur Khal Waterbody at BB
Parameters Unit
No. Phase I Canal, near Loha pool Block,
0.05km, SE 0.9km, SW 0.8km, ENE
2 Turbidity NTU 30 43 25
3 pH -- 7.5 7.7 7.3
4 Conductivity (at 25 C) µS/cm 835 990 465
5 Total Dissolve Solids mg/l 510.0 600.0 300.0
6 Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/l 172.3 198.5 122.5
Total Hardness as
7 mg/l 253.9 300.7 148.7
CaCO3
8 Calcium as Ca mg/l 58.20 72.20 32.70
9 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 26.40 29.30 16.30
10 Sodium mg/l 56 62 28
11 Potassium mg/l 12 14 6
12 Bi-Carbonate mg/l 172.3 198.5 122.5
13 Chloride as Cl mg/l 126.2 138.5 68.5
14 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 56.7 74.1 25.3
15 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 7.4 9.3 1.7
16 Fluoride as F mg/l 0.37 0.32 0.21
Phenolic compound as
17 mg/l BDL (DL - 0.001) BDL (DL - 0.001) BDL (DL - 0.001)
C6H5OH
18 Cyanide mg/l BDL (DL - 0.008) BDL (DL - 0.008) BDL (DL - 0.008)
19 DO mg/l 0.99 ND 5.3
20 BOD mg/l 11 17.6 4.6
21 COD mg/l 93.7 107.8 15.2
22 Oil & Grease mg/l 8 10 <5
23 Arsenic mg/l BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005)
24 Cadmium mg/l BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005)
25 Total Chromium mg/l BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005)

SW1 SW 2 SW3
Sl. Project Site – Kestopur Khal Waterbody at BB
Parameters Unit
No. Phase I Canal, near Loha pool Block,
0.05km, SE 0.9km, SW 0.8km, ENE
26 Iron mg/l 1.13 1.14 1.18
27 Copper mg/l BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005)
28 Lead mg/l BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005)
29 Manganese mg/l BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005)
30 Mercury mg/l BDL (DL - 0.01) BDL (DL - 0.01) BDL (DL - 0.01)
31 Zinc mg/l BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005) BDL (DL - 0.005)
32 Total Cloiform MPN/100ml 15000 20000 1500
Source: Sampling & Analysis by Envirotech East Private Limited (March to May, 2018)
BDL-Below Detection Limit
It is observed from Table 3.11 above,

 The analysis results indicate that the pH values of all the samples are in the range of 7.3 to 7.7.
All values meet criteria A as per CPCB surface water quality standard.
 TDS was observed in the range of 300 mg/l at SW3 (Waterbody at BB Block) to 600 mg/l at
 The chloride and sulphate were found to be in the range of 68.5 mg/l at SW3 (Waterbody at BB
Block) to 138.5 mg/l SW2 (Keshtopur Khal near Loha pool) and 25.3 mg/l at SW3 (Waterbody
at BB Block)) to 74.1 mg/l SW2 (Keshtopur Khal near Loha pool) respectively.
 In the study area BOD concentration varies between 4.6 mg/l at SW3 to 17.6 mg/l at SW2. BOD
tests measures only biodegradable fraction of the total potential DO consumption of a water
sample.
Comparing the values of pH, DO, BOD and total coliform with ‘Use based classification of surface
waters’ published by Central Pollution Control Board given in Table 3.11, the following analysis
has been done:
SW1 SW2 SW3

Locations Project Site – Phase I Kestopur Khal near Waterbody at BB
Canal Loha pool Block
Classes as per CPCB E E E
3.10.3.2 Analysis of Ground Water Quality

The results of the parameters analysed for the ground water samples are presented in Table 3.12.
Table 3-12: Ground Water Quality in Study Area
Sl. GW1 GW2 GW3 IS 10500:2012
No Parameters Unit Project Thakdari Mohishghot Acceptable Permissible
. Site 1.3km, S 0.7km, SW limits limits
1 Turbidity NTU 15 19 17 1 5

Sl. GW1 GW2 GW3 IS 10500:2012
No Parameters Unit Project Thakdari Mohishghot Acceptable Permissible
. Site 1.3km, S 0.7km, SW limits limits
2 pH -- 7.5 7.7 7.9 6.5-8.5 No Relaxation
3 Conductivity µS/cm 859.0 973.0 981.0 $ $
Total Dissolve
4 mg/l 524.0 597.0 610.0 500 2000
Solids
Alkalinity as
5 mg/l 304.4 327.6 338.2 200 600
CaCO3
Total Hardness
6 mg/l 212.2 243.0 265.9 300 600
as CaCO3
7 Calcium as Ca mg/l 42.0 48.9 50.5 75 200
Magnesium as
8 mg/l 26.1 29.4 34.0 30 100
Mg
9 Sodium mg/l 57 66 68 $ $
10 Potassium mg/l 5 8 7 $ $
11 Bicarbonate mg/l 304.4 327.6 338.2 $ $
12 Chloride as Cl mg/l 53.7 72.0 81.0 250 1000
13 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 22.0 30.8 39.0 200 400
14 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 0.3 0.7 0.6 45 No Relaxation
15 Flouride as F mg/l 0.20 0.38 0.32 1.00 1.5
Phenolic
BDL BDL BDL
16 compound as mg/l (DL - 0.001) (DL - 0.001) (DL - 0.001)
0.001 0.002
C6H5OH
BDL BDL BDL
17 Cyanide mg/l (DL - 0.008) (DL - 0.008) (DL - 0.008)
0.05 No Relaxation
BDL BDL BDL
18 Aluminium mg/l (DL - 0.01) (DL - 0.01) (DL - 0.01)
0.03 0.2
BDL BDL BDL
19 Arsenic mg/l (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005)
0.01 0.05
BDL BDL BDL
20 Cadmium mg/l (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005)
0.003 No Relaxation
Chromium as BDL BDL BDL
21 mg/l 0.05 No Relaxation
Cr+6 (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005)
22 Iron mg/l 0.86 0.79 0.82 0.3 No Relaxation
BDL BDL BDL
23 Copper mg/l (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005)
0.05 1.5
BDL BDL BDL
24 Lead mg/l (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005)
0.01 No Relaxation
BDL BDL BDL
25 Manganese mg/l (DL - 0.005) (DL - 0.005) (DL- 0.005)
0.1 0.3
BDL BDL BDL
26 Mercury mg/l (DL - 0.01) (DL - 0.01) (DL - 0.01)
0.001 No Relaxation
27 Zinc mg/l 0.25 0.31 0.35 5 15
BDL-Below Detection Limit
 pH: This parameter generally indicates the acid or alkaline nature of any solution and usually
does not bear any direct impact on consumers. The pH value ranged from 7.5 to 7.9 in the
collected water samples which do not exceed the recommended limit (6.5 - 8.5) of BIS. The

water samples were alkaline. The reason for such conditions may be due to different types of
buffers that may be present in the groundwater and presence of weak basic salt in the soil.
 Electrical Conductivity: Conductivity is the ability of water to carry an electrical current. This
ability mainly depends on presence of anion and cations in water and also depends on mobility,
valence of ions and temperature. High electrical conductivity affects the germination of crops and
it may result in much reduced yield. Higher the ionizable solids, greater will be the EC. In the
study area, electrical conductivity ranged between 859 μs/cm (GW1: Project site) to 981 μs/cm
(GW3: Mohishgot).
 Turbidity: The turbidity denotes the impurity of the water. Turbid nature of the water may be
attributed due to colloidal and extremely fine dispersion of sediments, micro-organisms and
organic matter. The turbidity in all the water samples was found above the acceptable limit.
 Total Hardness: The total hardness is an important parameter of water quality. Hard water
makes it difficult for domestic water users to form lather when washing. Hardness is defined as
the concentration of calcium and magnesium in water expressed as the equivalent of calcium
carbonate (CaCO3). The maximum total hardness in groundwater found to be 265.9 mg/l in
sample at GW3 (Mohishgot) and the minimum was observed as 212.2 mg/l in the sample at GW1
(Project Site).
 Calcium: The minimum level of calcium was found in Project Site (42.0 mg/l) and the maximum
value occurred in Mohishgot (50.5 mg/l). It was found that the entire samples were within the
acceptable limits recommended by BIS (75 mg/l).
 Sodium: Sodium plays an important role in nutrition and contributes to electrolytes regulated by
the kidneys, maintains water balance in the body, and affects muscle contraction and the
production of adrenaline and amino acids. However, high concentrations of sodium can disrupt
cell or blood chemistry. The excessive consumption of sodium may significantly cause many
diseases, especially hypertension. Sodium is also toxic to plants in high concentrations. Sodium
concentrations above 70 mg/l are problematic for irrigation if water is absorbed by leaves.
Sodium concentration in groundwater samples was observed in the range of 57 mg/l (Project
Site) to 68 mg/l (Mohishgot). The sodium content in the study area indicates that the water is not
very suitable for irrigation purpose.
 Alkalinity: Alkaline nature of the samples is generally attributed to the presence of carbonates
and bi-carbonates. Though alkalinity is not harmful to human health, its presence in the water
imparts an unpleasant taste. Alkalinity of water is due to presence of bicarbonate, carbonate and
strong bases. The alkalinity recorded in all ground water samples was exceeding the acceptable
limit (200 mg/l) but was within permissible limit of BIS (600 mg/l).
 TDS: The TDS concentration recorded from the ground water samples ranged from 524 mg/l to
610 mg/l. All the samples are within the maximum permissible limit of 2000 mg/l prescribed by

BIS for drinking water. TDS in ground water mainly gains its entry from agricultural activities,
industrial activities, geological formation, domestic water contamination etc.
 Chloride: The chloride concentration recorded from the ground water samples ranged from 53.7
mg/l (Project site) to 81.0 mg/l (Mohishgot). All the samples are within the Acceptable Limit of
250 mg/l prescribed by BIS for drinking water.
 Sulphate: Sulphate is a naturally occurring element found in groundwater. Sulphate

concentration was found in the range of 22 mg/l (Project site) to 39 mg/l (Mohishgot). The BIS
acceptable limit for sulphate in drinking water is 200 mg/l.
From the observation, it seems that ground water of the study area is suitable for drinking purpose
after conventional treatment.
3.11 METEOROLOGICAL CONDITION

Meteorology is the key to understand the air quality. The essential relationship between
meteorological condition and atmospheric dispersion involves the wind in the broadest sense. Other
factors such as variation in temperature, humidity etc. also plays a direct role in dispersion and
dilution of pollutants. Wind fluctuations over a very wide range of time, accomplish dispersion and
strongly influence other processes associated with them. This section makes a comparative analysis
of the meteorological data of the study area collected by project team in 2018. The additional data
used for the purpose are the 30 years’ average IMD data from 1971 to 2000 taken from
Meteorological Station, Dum Dum (Kolkata, West Bengal)
3.11.1 Secondary Data as per IMD Dum Dum (Kolkata, West Bengal)
North 24 Parganas is a deltaic district of West Bengal. The climate is tropical, like the rest of the
Gangetic West Bengal. It is also characterised by the Monsoon, which lasts from early June to mid-
September. Three distinct seasons are observed: summer, monsoon and winter. The weather remains
dry during the winter (mid November to mid-February) and humid during summer
The summary of the 30 years’ meteorological data of Dum Dum IMD Station from 1970-2000 is
shown in Table 3.13.
Table 3-13: Climatology & Meteorology of Dum Dum (Kolkata) IMD Observatory
Sl. No. Parameters Description of the Season
Total Annual average Rainfall is 1729.6 mm
Total
No. of Rainy
Months rainfall
Days
(in mm)
1 Rainfall in mm Winter December 12.3 0.6
(Dec to Feb) January 10.5 0.9

February 29.0 2.0
Total 17.3 -

Summer March 29.1 2.2
(Mar to May) April 58.7 3.6
May 148.4 7.2
Total 78.7 -
Monsoon June 298.8 12.6
July 352.5 16.9
(June to Sept)
August 349.9 17.0
September 298.7 13.4
Total 325.0 -
Post-Monsoon October 126.6 5.8
(Oct to Dec) November 15 1.1
December 12.3 0.6
Total 51.30 -
Months Max Min Avg
Dec 26.7 13.8 20.25
Jan 25.8 12.9 19.35
Winter
Feb 28.7 16.2 22.45
Average 27.07 14.3 20.68
Mar 33.3 21 27.15
Apr 35.5 24.5 30
Summer
May 35.4 25.6 30.5
Temperature (Mean Average 34.7 23.7 29.2
2
Daily Temp. in 0C) June 34 26.3 30.15
Jul 32.6 26 29.3
Monsoon
Aug 32.3 26.1 29.2
(June to Sept)
Sep 32.5 25.7 29.1
Average 32.9 26.0 29.4
Oct 32.2 23.8 28
Post-Monsoon Nov 29.9 19.1 24.5
(Oct to Dec) Dec 26.7 13.8 20.25
Average 29.60 18.90 24.25
08.30
Month 17:30 hrs
hrs
Dec 71 63
Winter
(Dec to Feb) Jan 74 58
Relative Humidity
3 Feb 70 52
in per cent
Average 71.7 57.7
Summer Mar 68.0 48
(Mar to May) Apr 72.0 61

May 74.0 67
Average 71.3 58.7
Jun 80 67
July 83 82
Monsoon
Aug 84 83
(June to Sept)
Sep 82 82
Average 82.3 78.5
Oct 76 74
Post-Monsoon Nov 70 67
(Oct to Dec) December 71 63
Average 72.3 68.0
Month Speed (kmph)
Dec 3.3
Winter
Jan 3.5
(Dec to Feb)
Feb 4.5
Average 3.8
Mar 6.4
Summer Apr 10.1
(Mar to May) May 11
Average 9.2
4 Wind-speed
Jun 9.8
July 8.6
Monsoon
Aug 8.2
(June to Sept)
Sep 6.8
Average 8.4
Oct 4.8
Post-Monsoon Nov 3.7
(Oct to Dec) Dec 3.3
Average 3.9
Source: Climatological Table 1971–2000, Indian Meteorological Department, GoI, New Delhi (Dum Dum Station)
Rainfall: The district gets heavy rainfall. Statistically speaking the district receives a total annual
rainfall of 1729.6 mm (as per IMD 30 year’s average data). The months of July and August
experience the most rainfall during the year.

Figure 3.11: Monthly Average Rainfall in mm as per IMD Dum Dum
Temperature: The area experiences moderate variance of maximum and minimum temperature over
the year with the highest reaching 35.5oC in the month of April to the minimum dropping to 12.9oC
in January.
Figure 3.12: Average Maximum and Minimum Temperature (0C) as per IMD Dum Dum
Relative Humidity: The region has reasonably humid climate especially during monsoon season
when moisture levels are very high in the surrounding air. July & August, being the rainiest months,
experience humidity level of 83% & 84% respectively in the daytime.

Figure 3.13: Relative Humidity during Day and Evening (%) as per IMD Dum Dum
Cloud Cover: Pressure levels are found to be fairly constant throughout the year except increase
during monsoon.
Wind pattern: The wind condition round the year is moderate with the prevailing direction South –
North followed by North-west. The wind speed varies from 5.7 m/s to 8.8 m/s.
Summer (March to May) Annual

Figure 3.14: Wind Rose - IMD Dum Dum
3.11.2 Onsite Meteorological Condition
The data on meteorological parameters in the study area was monitored for April, 2018. The data
was monitored from an automated weather-monitoring station sited at the project site. The
instrument was located to allow free exposure to atmosphere all through the study period. The hourly

onsite meteorological parameters recorded with an automated weather monitoring station are
attached as Annex 3.1. The summary of onsite data is presented in Table 3.14.
Table 3-14: Summary of Site Specific Meteorological Data
Temperature oC Humidity % Wind Precipitation
Month
Max Min Average Max Min Average Speed (m/s) (mm)
April 40.00 20.00 30.34 69.00 36.00 63.3 2.8 0.00
The Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) Dum Dum is located about 8 km away from site. As
such, some mismatches from site data are expected. Moreover, IMD records the data at two times a
day, at 0830 hours and at 1730 hours while the site specific data has been recorded at an hourly
interval. On comparison, the following observations are brought out:
 The temperature recorded on site when compared with the IMD Dum Dum data, variation was
found. The average maximum and minimum temperature recorded at site during March to May
were 400C and 200C respectively, whereas the average maximum temperature recorded at IMD
Dum Dum for the same season were 34.70C.
 The average relative humidity (maximum and minimum) was observed in the range of 69% to
36% during the study period whereas according to IMD Dum Dum, the average relative
humidity (0830 hrs and 1730 hrs) is in the range of 82.3% to 57.7%. This variation could be
because of the fact that the values considered for the site are actual values while the range of
IMD data represents the average values of 30 years.
 The average wind speed recorded was 2.8 m/s. Wind rose diagram (Figure 3.15) from the
monitored data shows that the predominant wind direction during the study period was mainly
from North-West and South-East.
Figure 3.15: Onsite Wind Rose- April, 2018

3.12 AIR ENVIRONMENT
The prime objective of the baseline air quality study was to establish the existing ambient air quality
of the study area, which will also help to assess the conformity to standards of the ambient air quality
during the operation of project. This section describes the identification of sampling locations,
methodology adopted during the monitoring period and sampling frequency.
3.12.1 Parameter & Frequency of Monitoring and Methodology

Ambient air quality monitoring has been carried out twice a week in each location during the study
period (March to May, 2018). The baseline data of ambient air has been generated for the following
parameters as mentioned below.
 Particulate Matter (PM10 & PM2.5)

 Sulphur Dioxide (SOx)
 Nitrogen Dioxide (NOx)
 Carbon monoxide (CO)
The duration of sampling of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), Respirable particulate matter (PM10),
SO2 and NO2 was each twenty four hourly continuous sampling per day and CO was sampled for 8
hours continuous thrice in 24 hour duration. The monitoring was conducted for two days in a week
for one month. This is to allow a comparison with the present revised standards mentioned in the
latest Gazette Notification of the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) (November 2009).
It was ensured that the equipment was placed at a height of at least 3 to 4 m above the ground level at
each monitoring station, for negating the effects of wind-blown ground dust. The distance of the
sampler from any air flow obstacle i.e. buildings, walls, was more than two times the height of the
obstacle. The equipment was placed at open space free from trees and vegetation which otherwise act
as a sink of pollutants resulting in lower levels in monitoring results. Monitoring has been carried out
as per the latest CPCB and MoEF&CC guidelines and notifications.
The monitoring locations have been selected keeping in mind the seasonal as well as the annual wind
direction pattern of the study area, accessibility, topography, safety and presence of inhabited
localities. The details of the monitoring locations are depicted in the Table 3.15 and Figure 3.16.
Table 3-15: Air Quality Monitoring Stations
Code Location Distance Direction Selection Criteria
AAQ1 Project Site - - Project Site
AAQ2 Thakdari 1.12 S Near East Kolkata Wetlands
AAQ3 Mohishgot 0.7 SW Pre-dominant wind direction
AAQ4 AB Block 0.68 NNW Downwind direction
AAQ5 BF Block 1.5 ESE Settlement
AAQ6 Tarulia 1.8 WNW Settlement
AAQ7 Krishna Nagar 1.3 SW Settlement
Source: Selection of sampling locations by GCPL

3.12.2 Instruments used for Sampling and Analytical Techniques
With a view to collecting the samples, Envirotech Make Calibrated Respirable Dust Samplers (RDS-
APM 460 BL) along with Gaseous attachment and Fine Particulate Matter (FPS-APM 550) have
been used. The RDS is capable of drawing air at a flow rate of 0.95 to 1.3 m3/min with very little
pressure drop for RDS and FPS is designed to operate at an air flow rate of 1m 3/hr. Filter papers
(EPM 2000, Whatman & Whatman 46.2 mm dia) were used for the collection of samples to analyze
them for particulate matters and heavy metals. Samples for analyzing SO2 & NO2 were collected by
drawing air at a flow-rate of 0.5 liters per minute (lpm) through an absorbing solution for the
duration of 24 hrs. Sampling and analysis methodology adopted is given in Table 3.16.
Table 3-16: Sampling and Analytical Methodology
Sl. No. Parameter Methodology
1 Particulate Matter 10 (PM10) (µg/m3) APM 550 Fine Particulate Sampler (Gravimetric method)
2 Particulate Matter 10 (PM2.5) (µg/m3) APM 550 Fine Particulate Sampler (Gravimetric method)
3 Sulphur Dioxide SO2 (µg/m3) West and Gaeke Method
4 Nitrogen dioxide NO2 (µg/m3) IS 5182, Part 6, Jacob & Hochheiser modified
IS 5182, Part 10, Non-dispersive Infrared Absorption
5 Carbon monoxide (mg/m3)
method
3.12.3 Analysis of Baseline Concentration
The analysis was carried out as per the method described in the applicable IS codes. Various
statistical parameters like 98th percentile, average, standard deviation, maximum and minimum
values have been computed from the observed raw data for all the AAQ monitoring locations. The
results are shown in Table 3.17 to Table 3.21.
Table 3-17: Particulate Matter (PM10) in μg/m3
Standard 98
Code Location Minimum Maximum Mean NAAQS
Deviation Percentile
AAQ1 Project Site 135.6 143.4 2.07 143.0 139.2 100
AAQ2 Thakdari 98.1 103.6 1.41 103.1 100.7 100
AAQ3 Mohishgot 150.3 157.2 1.87 157.0 153.6 100
AAQ4 AB Block 129.9 137.2 2.15 137.2 133.1 100
AAQ5 BF Block 176.6 184.5 2.83 184.5 179.6 100
AAQ6 Tarulia 142.4 148.4 1.74 148.2 145.6 100
AAQ7 Krishna Nagar 124.8 132.7 2.06 132.0 127.9 100
Table 3-18: Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in μg/m3

Standard 98
AAQ1 Project Site 55.4 60.7 1.82 60.7 57.9 60
AAQ2 Thakdari 50.1 55.5 1.69 55.3 53.0 60
AAQ3 Mohishgot 57.4 65.5 2.24 64.9 60.9 60
AAQ4 AB Block 53.0 61.3 2.29 60.7 56.3 60
AAQ5 BF Block 65.1 71.9 2.19 71.7 67.9 60

Standard 98
AAQ6 Tarulia 56.1 62.1 1.35 61.5 58.7 60
Table 3-19: Sulphur dioxide (SO2) in μg/m3

Standard 98
AAQ1 Project Site 12.2 14.8 0.83 14.8 13.5 80
AAQ2 Thakdari 10.0 12.8 0.86 12.8 11.7 80
AAQ3 Mohishgot 12.2 15.9 0.99 15.7 13.9 80
AAQ4 AB Block 10.1 13.0 0.90 12.9 11.8 80
AAQ5 BF Block 14.2 16.9 0.73 16.8 15.6 80
AAQ6 Tarulia 11.2 14.7 1.04 14.6 13.1 80
Table 3-20: Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) in μg/m3

Minimu Standard 98
Code Location Maximum Mean NAAQS
m Deviation Percentile
AAQ1 Project Site 31.1 34.5 1.11 34.5 32.9 80
AAQ2 Thakdari 23.9 27.8 1.14 27.7 26.1 80
AAQ3 Mohishgot 32.2 35.9 1.06 35.9 33.9 80
AAQ4 AB Block 33.9 37.3 0.92 37.1 35.5 80
AAQ5 BF Block 39.2 41.9 0.73 41.8 40.6 80
AAQ6 Tarulia 33.9 35.4 0.50 35.3 34.7 80
Table 3-21: Carbon Monoxide (CO) in mg/m3

Standard 98
AAQ1 Project Site 0.92 1.12 0.05 1.12 1.03 2
AAQ2 Thakdari 0.92 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.97 2
AAQ3 Mohishgot 0.96 1.16 0.06 1.16 1.07 2
AAQ4 AB Block 0.86 0.95 0.02 0.95 0.92 2
AAQ5 BF Block 1.05 1.25 0.06 1.25 1.17 2
AAQ6 Tarulia 1.11 1.23 0.04 1.23 1.18 2
Table 3-22: Consolidated 24 hours averaging Values of AAQ (98th Percentile)

Distance
Code Location PM 10 PM 2.5 SO2 NO2 CO
(km)
AAQ1 Project Site - 143.0 60.7 14.8 34.5 1.12
AAQ2 Thakdari 1.12 103.1 55.3 12.8 27.7 1.00
AAQ3 Mohishgot 0.7 157.0 64.9 15.7 35.9 1.16

Distance
Code Location PM 10 PM 2.5 SO2 NO2 CO
(km)
AAQ4 AB Block 0.68 137.2 60.7 12.9 37.1 0.95
AAQ5 BF Block 1.5 184.5 71.7 16.8 41.8 1.25
AAQ6 Tarulia 1.8 148.2 61.5 14.6 35.3 1.23
AAQ7 Krishna Nagar 1.3 132.0 61.0 13.0 35.9 0.95
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
Industrial, Residential, Rural & Other
100 60 80 80 02
Areas
Ecologically Sensitive Area
100 60 80 80 02
(notified by Central Government)
18th
Source: Gazette of India Notification, dated Nov, 2009
* Annual Arithmetic Means of minimum 104 measurements in a year at a particular site taken twice a week 24 hourly at uniform
intervals,
** 24 hourly or 8 hourly or 1 hourly monitored values, as applicable shall be complied with 98% of the time in a year. 2% of the time
they may exceed the limits but not on two consecutive days of monitoring,
*** For CO, 8 hourly standard is being considered
Observation & Interpretation

μg/m3). PM2.5 ranges between 55.3 μg/m3 in AAQ2 to 71.7 μg/m3 in AAQ5. The values recorded for
both the parameters were higher than stipulated standard except PM2.5 value at Thakdari.
The higher concentration of PM10 & PM2.5 in AAQ4 may be attributed to its proximity to major roads
and high vehicular movement.
Sulphur Dioxide (SOx) & Nitrogen Dioxide (NOx): The values are well within the NAAQ standard
prescribed by CPCB. The anthropogenic sources for SO2 emissions are high vehicular movement.
The concentration ranges from 12.8 μg/m3 in AAQ2 to 16.8 μg/m3 at AAQ5.
μg/m3) and lowest at AAQ2 (27.7 μg/m3).
The values, however, are well within the NAAQ standard.
3.13 SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL

3.13.1 Frequency & Parameters of Sampling
Sound Pressure Level (herein referred to as Noise levels) was recorded at an interval of 60 minutes
during the day and night time to compute the day equivalent, night equivalent and day-night
equivalent level. The noise level was monitored once during the study period at each monitoring

location. The noise level is recorded in dB(A). The important parameters measured are Leq, Lday,
and Lnight.
Leq: Noise monitoring equipments provide the facility for measurement of Leq directly. However,
Leq can also be calculated using the following equation:
Leq (hourly) = L50 + (L10 - L90)2/60
Where,
L10 (Ten Percentile Exceeding Level) is level of sound, which exceeds 10% of the total time of
measurement
L90 (Ninety Percentile Exceeding Level) is level of sound, which exceeds 90% of the total time
of measurement.
Leq: This represents Leq of whole day including night. Leq is calculated as logarithmic average
using the hourly Leq for whole 24 hrs in a day.
Lday: This represents Leq of day-time. Lday is calculated as logarithmic average using the hourly
Leq’s for day time hours from 6.00 AM to 10.00 PM
Lnight: This represents Leq of night-time. Lnight is calculated as logarithmic average using the
hourly Leq’s for night-time hours from 10.00 PM to 6.00 AM
3.13.2 Instruments used for Sampling
Envirotech make automatic sound level meter (SLM100) was used for measuring the noise levels.
This instrument measures Sound Pressure Level (SPL), maximum sound pressure level (max) and
equivalent continuous noise level (Leq).
3.13.3 Sampling and Analytical Techniques

The noise level was recorded continuous for 24 hours at an interval of 1 hour. The hourly average
computed from the noise reading taken at every 5 minutes’ interval. The monitoring was carried out
once during the study period. The important parameters to be measured are Leq, Lday, and Lnight.
3.13.4 Monitoring Locations

Assessment of ambient noise levels is an important parameter in preparation of impact assessment
report. Noise levels are more annoying in the night time particularly in the residential area. The
environmental impact of noise can have several effects varying from annoyance to hearing loss
depending on loudness of noise levels. The monitoring for noise levels was done in 7 locations
keeping considering the population and traffic of the area. The locations are given in Table 3.23 and
Figure 3.17.
Table 3-23: Noise Level Monitoring Locations
Distance
Sl. No. Station Name Code Direction
(km)
1 Project Site N1 - -
2 Thakdari N2 1.12 S
3 Mohishgot N3 0.7 SW

4 AB Block N4 0.68 NNW
5 BF Block N5 1.5 ESE
6 Tarulia N6 1.8 WNW
7 Krishna Nagar N7 1.3 SW
Source: Selection of sampling locations by GCPL
3.13.5 Analysis of Baseline Concentration

The major source of the noise level fluctuation in daytime and night time was observed majorly due
to high vehicular movement.
Leq Day Time: The maximum noise level in daytime observed was 62.6 dB(A) near project site and
minimum noise level observed was 53.9 dB(A) at Krishna nagar.
Leq Night Time: The maximum noise level in night time observed was 51.5 dB(A) near Project Site
while minimum noise level was 42.7 dB(A) at Krishna Nagar (Figure 3.18 & 3.19). Analysis results
for of Ambient Noise level in day time and night time are represented in Table 3.24.
Table 3-24: Ambient Noise Level in Day time & Night time
N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 N7
Noise
Time Project AB BF Krishna
Locations Thakdari Mohishgot Tarulia
Site Block Block Nagar
L Max 67.0 60.6 64.4 62.8 63.3 60.4 58.8
L Min 54.5 51.2 54.6 46.6 45.1 44.2 42.6
L equ 62.6 56.3 61.3 59.4 58.9 56.8 53.9
Day
L10 65.3 59.0 63.5 62.4 62.7 59.8 57.1
L50 61.6 55.3 60.9 58.4 56.3 55.1 52.5
L90 56.7 51.7 57.3 50.2 47.1 47.8 42.8
L Max 56.2 48.1 53.9 53.7 50.9 49.2 45.7
L Min 46.2 45.2 48.9 41.1 37.6 40.1 36.5
L equ 51.5 46.6 50.7 48.6 45.1 45.4 42.7
Night
L10 54.6 47.4 52.9 51.7 48.2 48.6 45.6
L50 49.2 46.5 49.5 47.2 42.7 42.6 42.2
L90 46.8 45.7 49.0 41.2 38.4 41.3 38.5
Ambient Noise Standards (CPCB)

Limits in dB(A), Leq Limits in dB(A), Leq
Area Category of Area Category of
Day Night Day Night
code area code area
Time Time Time Time
A Industrial Area 75 70 C Residential Area 55 45
Commercial
B 65 55 D Silent Zone 50 40
Area
*Silent zone is defined as an area up to 100 meters around such premises as hospitals, educational institutions and courts. The silence
zones are to be declared by the competent authority.
Note: (i) Day time means 06:00 hrs to 22:00 hrs, (ii) Night time means 22:00 hrs to 06:00 hrs

Figure 3.18: Ambient Noise Level during Day
Figure 3.19: Ambient Noise Level at Night

3.14 TRAFFIC SCENARIO
Traffic Volume count was done at 2 locations marked on the map in Figure 3.20 and given in Table
3.25. The monitoring was conducted in May, 2018. 24 hours classified Volume Count was done for
different categories of vehicles. The traffic volume count was done as per IRC code and 2 staffs were
deployed for single direction vehicular movement. The total numbers of vehicles per hour under the
categories are determined.
Table 3-25: Existing Traffic Scenario
Carrier Type Passenger Carrier Goods Carrier
Equivalency Factor 0.5 1 1 1.5 1.5 3 1.5 3 3 3 4.5 1.5 4.5
Tractor with Trolley
Tempo (3 Wheeler)
Mini Trucks (Tata
2 Wheelers, Bike,
Trucks (m Axle)
Trucks (2 Axle)
Trucks (3Axle)
4W Mini Cabs
Tampo/Auto
Total
3 Wheelers,
Mini Bus
Location
Tractor
Scooter
407)
Car
Bus

Carrier Type Passenger Carrier Goods Carrier
Equivalency Factor 0.5 1 1 1.5 1.5 3 1.5 3 3 3 4.5 1.5 4.5
Tractor with Trolley

Tempo (3 Wheeler)
Mini Trucks (Tata
2 Wheelers, Bike,
Trucks (m Axle)
Trucks (2 Axle)
Trucks (3Axle)
4W Mini Cabs
Tampo/Auto
Total
3 Wheelers,
Mini Bus
Location
Tractor
Scooter
407)
Car
Bus
Vehicle/
Sheraton Hotel
No. of
(0.54 km, E)
day
Near Ruchi
400 614 80 216 81 46 40 39 8 6 6 11 9 1556

T1
PCU/
No.
day
of
200 614 80 324 121.5 138 60 117 24 18 27 16.5 40.5 1781

Vehicle/
No. of
Bypass (2km, W)
day
Near Salt Lake
758 895 123 246 120 113 32 62 12 11 9 16 13 2410

T2
PCU/day
No. of
379 895 123 369 180 339 48 186 36 33 40.5 24 58.5 2711
Source: Traffic Survey by EEPL
Based on the results of the survey, the existing PCU of each location was compared with the capacity
of each type of road as suggested by Indian Road Congress thus determining the existing Level of
Service (LoS) for each location. The calculation is given in Chapter 4.
3.15 ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT

A baseline terrestrial ecology has been established to understand the ecological condition of the
study area. The purpose of establishing the baseline is to collect comprehensive and up-to-date
ecological information relating to the study area to allow an assessment of potential impacts
associated with the operation of the project on terrestrial ecology. It is also used to propose suitable
mitigation measures, and for the development of monitoring programme where necessary. The
ecological baseline information is collected from primary survey, literature reviews and District
Census Handbook.
3.15.1 Forest Resource

Though a part of the Sundarbans Reserve Forest falls within the district of North Twenty Four
Parganas, still the forest area of the district is only 0.02% of the total land area. Only 91.98 hectares
of land falls under Reserved Forest category and only 1.72 hectares of land falls under Un-classed
State Forest category.
There are no reserve forests in the study area nor there presence of any National Park, Wildlife
Sanctuary, Biosphere Reserve, Tiger Reserve within the study area.

3.15.2 Project Site
The project site is under possession of the Proponent where the building has already been
constructed.
3.15.3 Cropping Pattern

As the district falls within the Gangetic delta, the soil of the district is very favourable for cultivation.
Shallow black and brown soils are also found. The presence of good number of rivers, creeks, khals
etc. also favours the cropping pattern of the district. The major crops grown in the district are rice
and wheat. Varieties of rice viz. Aus, Aman and Boro are grown in the district in abundant. Beside
food grains oil seeds, potato and cash crops like jute are also produced in the district.
However, agricultural land covers only 16% of the study area. The paddy fields of East Kolkata
Wetlands (which is just 1.5 km form the project site) produce 15,000 Metric Tonnes of additional
paddy per annum.
3.15.4 Floral & Faunal Composition

There are no forest patches within the study area. However, naturally grown tree patches are found to
be present. Trees commonly observed in the study area included Banyan, Gulmohar, Dhak, Khajur,
Teak, Mango, Neem etc.
The floral species observed during site visit is given in Table 3.26.
Table 3-26: Floral Species recorded in the Study Area
Scientific Name Common Name Family Type
Acacia arabica Babul Fabaceae Shrub
Aegle marmelos Bel Rutaceae Tree
Aeschynomene aspera Shola Fabaceae Herb
Albizzia lebbeck Siris Fabaceae Tree
Anona squamosa Ata Annonaceae Shrub/Small tree
Azadirachta indica Neem Meliaceae Tree
Bacopa monnieri Baam Scrophulariaceae Shrub
Butea monosperma Palash Fabaceae Tree
Calamus rotang Bet Arecaceae Climber
Canna indica Sarvajjaya/Indian Shot Cannaceae Plant
Cassia fistula Badar - lathi Fabaceae Tree
Centella asiatica Ballari Apiaceae Herb
Clerodendron infortunatum Bhant Lamiaceae Shrub
Coccinia cordifolia Kunduru Cucurbitaceae Climber
Colocasia esculenta Arvi Araceae Herb
Commelina diffusa Kanshura Commelinaceae herb
Delonix regia Gulmohar Caesalpiniaceae Tree
Eclipta prostrata Bhringaraj Asteraceae Herb
Enhydra fluctuans - Asteraceae Herb

Scientific Name Common Name Family Type
Ficus benghalensis Banyan Moraceae Tree
Heliotropium indicum Hathajori Boraginaceae Herb
Hygrophila schulli Bhankari Acanthaeceae Shrub
Lantana camera Raimuniya Verbenaceae Shrub
Mangifera indica Aam Anacardiaceae Tree
Mimusops Elengi Maulsari Sapotaceae Tree
Morinda citrifolia Bartundi Rubiaceae Tree
Phoenix sylvestris Khajur Arecaceae Tree
Samanea saman Khirish Arecaceae Tree
Tectona grandis Teak Lamiaceae Tree
Tiliacora acemosa Tiliacora Menispermaceae. Plant
Zizyphus oenoplia Shiakol Rhamnaceae Shrub
Source: (i) Field Survey (ii) Discussion with local people (ii) Secondary reports
As already mentioned that there are no forest patches in the study area to harbour important species
of fauna. However, due to presence of East Kolkata Wetland in the vicinity of the project site,
important avian species were recorded during the study period. Table 3.27 lists the faunal species
found in the study area.
Table 3-27: Faunal species recorded in the study area
Scientific Name Common Name WPA, 1972 IUCN Status
Mammals
Herpestes auropunctatus Wild mongoose Schedule II Least Concern
Pteropus giganteus Flying fox Schedule V -
Funambulus pennanti Squirrel Schedule IV Least Concern
Mus booduga Indian field mouse - Least Concern
Bandicota bengalensis Bandicoot rat - Least Concern
Canis aureus Golden jackal Schedule II Least Concern
Herpestes edwardsii Grey mongoose - Least Concern
Suncus murinus House shrew - Least Concern
Felis chaus Jungle cat Schedule II Least Concern
Reptiles
Naja naja Indian cobra Schedule II Least Concern
Bungarus fasciatus Banded krait Schedule IV Least Concern
Xenochrophis piscator Checkered keelback Schedule II -
Hemidactylus flaviviridis Gecko - Least Concern
Calotes versicolor Girgiti - Least Concern
Birds
Acidotheres fusus Jungle myna Schedule IV Least Concern
Anas strepera Gadwall Schedule IV Least Concern
Anthus rufulus Paddyfield pipit Schedule IV Least Concern
Amaurornis phoenicurus White breasted waterhen - Least Concern
Ardea cinerea Grey heron Schedule IV Least Concern
Ardeola grayii Indian Pond Heron Schedule IV Least Concern

Scientific Name Common Name WPA, 1972 IUCN Status
Calidris minuta Little stint - Least Concern
Centropus sinensis Crow pheasant Schedule IV Least Concern
Ceryle rudis Pied Kingfisher Schedule IV Least Concern
Charadrius dubius Little ringed plover Schedule IV Least Concern
Columba livia Rock pigeon - Least Concern
Corvus splendens House Crow Schedule V Least Concern
Cypsiurus balasiensis Asian palm swift - Least Concern
Dinopium benghalense Lesser golden-backed woodpecker Schedule IV Least Concern
Eudynamys scolopacea Asian koel Schedule IV Least Concern
Gallinago gallinago Common snipe Schedule IV Least Concern
Gallinula chloropus Common Moorhen - Least Concern
Egretta alba Great Egret Schedule IV Least Concern
Halcyon smyrnensis White-throated kingfisher Schedule IV Least Concern
Hierococcyx varius Common Hawk Cuckoo Schedule IV Least Concern
Himantopus himontopus Black-winged stilt Schedule IV Least Concern
Hydrophasianus chirurgus Pheasant‐tailed jacana Schedule IV Least Concern
Ixobrychus sinensis Yellow bittern Schedule IV Least Concern
Lanius cristatus Brown shrike - Least Concern
Megalaima zeylanica Brownheaded barbet Schedule IV Least Concern
Megalaima haemacephala Coppersmith Barbet Schedule IV Least Concern
Merops orientalis Green bee eater - Least Concern
Milvus migrans Black Kite - Least Concern
Motacilla flava Yellow wagtail - Least Concern
Passer domesticus House Sparrow - Least Concern
Phalacrocornax carbo Little Cormorant Schedule IV Least Concern
Phalacrocornax fuscicollis Indian Cormorant Schedule IV Least Concern
Phycnonotus jocosus Bulbul Schedule IV Least Concern
Ploceus philippinus Baya Weaver Schedule IV Least Concern
Psittacula krameri Rose ringed parakeet Schedule IV Least Concern
Streptopilia chinensis Spotted Dove Schedule IV Least Concern
Streptopelia decaocto Collared dove Schedule IV Least Concern
Streptopelia senegalensis Laughing dove Schedule IV Least Concern
Tringa glareola Wood sandpiper Schedule IV Least Concern
Upupa epops Common Hoopoe - Least Concern
Source: (i) Field Survey (ii) Discussion with local people (ii) Secondary reports
3.16 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT

3.16.1 Demographic Profile
The study area, as given in Table 3.28, indicates that there are 174 villages in the study area. This
information for the analysis is sourced from the Census of India, 2001 and Census of India, 2011
data. Populations of villages located even partially in the study area have been considered in
enumerating the study area population.

As per the census of India, 2011, the total population is 46, 60,303 out of which 24, 29,125 are males
and 22, 31,178 are females. The increase is due to urbanization of the area as part of New Town
development. The comparative analysis of the demographic features of the Study Area for Census
2001 and 2011 are given in Table 3.28. The gender ratio in the study area has increased 847 to 919
from 2001 to 2011. This increasing trend in gender ratio has been observed in the whole study
region.
Table 3-28: Sex Ratio of the Study Area
Number of Villages/wards
Gender Ratio
Population
Female
Total
Male
Parameters
2001
2011
2001
2011
2001
2011
2001
2011
Project site 1 3607 7224 1837 3676 1770 3548 964 965
within 2 km 11 206500 280026 105163 142376 101337 137650 964 967
2km to 5 km 22 827417 990635 425991 500302 401426 490333 942 980
5km to 7km 25 546682 611665 290198 314274 256484 297391 884 946
7km to 10km 115 2774584 2770753 1536660 1468497 1237924 1302256 806 887
Study Area 174 4358790 4660303 2359849 2429125 1998941 2231178 847 919
Source: Census of India 2001 & 2011
3.16.2 House Hold Size

The household size in study area is 4.4 according to census 2011 and 4.9 according to Census 2001.
The decrease in the household size is again due to influx of people/labors that has been marked as
families in the Census data. (Table 3.29).
Table 3-29: Household Size of Study Area
Number Total Population No. of Households Household Size
Parameters of
Villages 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
Project site 1 3607 7224 808 1920 4.5 3.8
within 2 km 11 206500 280026 46646 64095 4.4 4.4
2km to 5 km 22 827417 990635 183795 245844 4.5 4.0
5km to 7km 25 546682 611665 116123 142466 4.7 4.3
7km to 10km 115 2774584 2770753 546766 610775 5.1 4.5
Study Area 174 4358790 4660303 894138 1065100 4.9 4.4
3.16.3 Child Population and Sex Ratio

As per the 2001 and 2011 census, the total population between the ages of 0 – 6 years was 405329
and 374033 respectively. Child sex ratio as per census 2011 was 944 compared to 939 of census
2001 indicating increase in number of female child (Table 3.30).

Table 3-30: Child Population Sex Ratio of Study Area
No. of Villages/ towns
Population
(0-6 years)
(0-6 years)
(0-6 years)
Gender
Female
Ratio
Total
Male
Area
2001
2011
2001
2011
2001
2011
2001
2011
Project site 1 476 734 238 398 238 336 1000 844
within 2 km 11 20821 21982 10550 11175 10271 10807 974 967
2km to 5 km 22 80944 82496 41417 41991 39527 40505 954 965
5km to 7km 25 53200 52213 27260 26678 25940 25535 952 957
7km to 10km 115 249888 216608 129569 112177 120319 104431 929 931
Total 174405329 374033 209034 192419 196295 181614 939 944
3.16.4 Vulnerable Group

While assessing social impact of any area, it is very important to identify the population who fall
under the marginalized and vulnerable groups such as Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes.
Although these groups are usually small farmers or landless, their livelihood is the worst affected
and they get the worst compensation deals due to small land-holding and less properties. So, special
attention has to be given towards these groups. The statistics regarding the social profile of the
human population (distribution of SC & ST Community) in the study area are given in Table 3.31.
11% of the population in the study area is in SC category and 0.8 % is in ST category as per the
2011 Census.
Table 3-31: Distribution of SC & ST Population in the Study Area
Population
No. of Villages/ towns
Schedule
Schedule
Total
caste
tribe
Area
2011 (%)
2001 (%)
2001 (%)
2011 (%)
2001
2011
2001
2011
2001
2011
Project site 1 3607 7224 2350 2428 65.2 33.6 22 29 0.6 0.4
within 2 km 11 206500 280026 45539 75686 22.1 27.0 2450 6797 1.2 2.4
2km to 5 km 22 827417 990635 120273 157332 14.5 15.9 3639 9627 0.4 1.0
5km to 7km 25 546682 611665 71103 82530 13.0 13.5 2672 4110 0.5 0.7
7km to 10km 115 2774584 2770753 183743 193736 6.6 7.0 10656 15103 0.4 0.5
Total 174 4358790 4660303 423008 511712 9.7 11.0 19439 35666 0.4 0.8

3.16.5 Literacy Rate
Literacy rate is one of the most significant indicators of human and social development. This not only
reflects on the educational attainment of the population but also reflects on the status of women, caste
equation and economic condition of a particular area. It also shows the skill level of the people and
their capability to get trained and work in various sectors. The literacy rate is given in Table 3.32 to
describe the total and gender- wise literacy rate of the people in the study area.
Table 3-32: Literacy Rate in the Study Area
No. of Total Literacy Rate Male Literacy Rate Female Literacy Rate
Area Villages/
towns 2001 (%) 2011 (%) 2001 (%) 2011 (%) 2001 (%) 2011 (%)
Project site 1 69.50 80.12 75.88 81.69 62.88 78.49
within 2 km 2 73.68 80.68 78.01 83.52 69.18 77.75
2km to 5 km 21 76.87 81.95 80.84 84.27 72.66 79.57
5km to 7km 15 72.35 77.34 76.66 80.28 67.47 74.25
7km to 10km 22 72.78 78.81 75.68 80.62 69.18 76.76
Total 61 73.54 79.40 76.84 81.50 69.65 77.11
The literacy rate was found to have increased from 73.54% in 2001 to 79.40% in 2011 in the study
area. The female literacy rate of the study area has shown increase from 69.65% in 2001 to 77.11%
in 2011. In comparison the literacy growth rate of males have shown a low increase from 76.84% in
2001 to 81.50% in 2011.
3.16.6 Economic Activities

The economy of an area is defined by the occupational pattern and income level of the people in the
area. The Work Participation Rate and proportion of Main Workers are some of the main indicators
of economic condition of the area. Table 3.33 shows the distribution of workers in the study area.
Table 3-33: Section wise Distribution of workers in the Study Area
No. of Marginal
Total Worker Main worker Non Worker
Area Villages/ Worker
towns 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
Project site 1 1069 2548 992 2455 77 93 2538 4676
within 2 km 2 76603 109152 71266 97312 5337 11840 129897 170874
2km to 5 km 21 292264 369212 275542 343166 16722 26046 535153 621423
5km to 7km 15 193508 236697 180688 205900 12820 30797 353174 374968
7km to 10km 22 1046590 1063313 992062 942277 54528 121036 1727994 1707440
Total 61 1610034 1780922 1520550 1591110 89484 189812 2748756 2879381
The Work Participation Rate in the study area was found to have increased from 36.94% in 2001 to
38.21% in 2011. There has been an increase in percentage of main workers as well. The work
participation rate, although low, is showing an increasing trend indicating the availability of jobs in
the study area.

3.16.7 Occupational Pattern
The occupational pattern in the study area was found to be varied. Majority of the population are
involved in other industries. The occupational pattern in the study area and change during the last
decade is described in the Table 3.34 below.
Table 3-34: Occupational Pattern in the Study Area
No. of Agriculture Household
Cultivators Others
Area Villages/ Labourers Industries
towns 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
Project site 1 58 13 35 24 23 33 876 2385
within 2 km 2 1176 1096 944 616 737 2695 68409 92905
2km to 5 km 21 4532 3868 3806 3774 4674 6126 262530 329398
5km to 7km 15 3891 4112 2332 3536 3191 5243 171274 193009
7km to 10km 22 8631 14123 9100 11004 21401 28229 952930 888921
Total 61 18288 23212 16217 18954 30026 42326 1456019 1506618
3.16.8 Infrastructure Facilities

The socio-economic analysis of the study area shows that in terms of educational and other
developments the area is moderately developed.
3.16.8.1 Educational Facilities

Education is not only about enhancing skills or becoming employable. It is for getting equipped for a
better quality of life. For example, it has been observed from NFHS (National Family Health Survey)
that the educated females prefer going to doctors than availing traditional health services. The
women who mostly go for ante-natal check-ups (ANC’s) are the ones who are educated at least up to
Class 8. Proper education can help improve child mortality rate, maternal health, nutritional intake,
etc. of the people. The details of village-wise education facilities in the study area are described
below in Table 3.35.
Table 3-35: Educational Facilities
Primary Secondary Senior Secondary
Number of Middle School
Area School School School
Villages
2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
Within 2 km 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2km to 5 km 18 8 10 5 6 1 3 0 1
5km to 7km 12 22 28 5 8 4 4 2 5
7km to 10km 17 15 20 6 7 2 5 0 5
Study Area 49* 66 88 6 24 6 10 1 6
*Census data lists infrastructure information of villages only
There are a total of 88 Primary Schools, 24 Middle Schools, 10 Secondary School and 6 Senior
Secondary Schools in the study area as per Census 2011. It can be seen that there has been an
increase in the number of schools over the 10 years in the study area.

3.16.8.2 Drinking Water Facilities
One of the most important factors responsible for the emergence of a settlement is availability of
water. Many water sources such as wells, hand pumps, tanks, etc. are available in rural areas. In the
villages under study, the main source of water is hand pump followed by tube well and wells. The
water from the sources is used for drinking, bathing and household purposes. The list of water
sources is given in Table 3.36. It can be seen from the table that there is increase in the number of
Taps, hand pumps from 2001 to 2011 while there has been a decline in the number of tube wells.
Table 3-36: Drinking Water Facilities
Tap Well Tank Hand pump Tube well
Area No. of villages
2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
Within 2 km 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
2km to 5 km 6 0 4 0 1 0 6 0 6 5 2
5km to 7km 15 1 8 0 1 4 13 0 10 15 6
7km to 10km 13 0 3 0 0 1 10 0 10 13 6
Study Area 54 4 22 0 0 3 47 6 44 51 23
3.16.8.3 Health Facilities

Health is a pre-requisite for human development and is an essential component for the well-being of
mankind. The health problems of any community are influenced by interplay of various factors
including social, economic and political. The common beliefs, customs, practices related to health
and disease in turn influence the health seeking behaviour of the community.
Overall the medical facilities present in the study area seem adequate to cater the population. The
details of the health related facilities available in the study area are shown in Table 3.37.
Table 3-37: Medical Health Facilities
Mother-Child Public Public Family
TB Clinic
No. of Welfare Health Health Welfare
Area (Numbers)
Villages Centre Centre Sub-centre Centre
2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
Within 2 km 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
2km to 5 km 6 0 5 0 0 1 4 0 3 0 0
5km to 7km 15 10 19 1 13 1 13 0 5 0 6
7km to 10km 13 10 4 0 2 2 7 0 1 0 1
Study Area 54 9 6 2 4 8 25 0 3 0 2
3.16.8.4 Post Office & Bank Facilities

The number of post offices in the area has increased from 18 in 2001 to 19 in 2011. Agricultural
societies have increased from 7 to 12 from 2001 to 2011. Various types of banking facilities
available in the study area are illustrated in Table 3.38.

Table 3-38: Post Offices & Bank Facilities
Commercial Agricultural
Number of Post Office Co-operative Bank
Area Bank Credit Societies
Villages
2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011
within 2 km 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1
2km to 5 km 6 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
5km to 7km 15 6 6 3 5 0 2 2 4
7km to 10km 13 5 6 0 2 1 0 2 3
Study Area 54 12 9 5 4 0 0 3 1
Source: Census of India 2001 & 2011.

MAPS
88°21'0"E 88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Key Map of West Bengal

Project Site
22°39'0"N
22°39'0"N
Scale: Not to Scale

Legend
Project Site
10km Buffer
Settlements
Streams
Roads
22°36'0"N
22°36'0"N
Forest
Waterbody
Vegetation
Contours
10.0km Locations
Source:
Software Used:
22°33'0"N
22°33'0"N
Figure 3.1: Study Area Map
Project:
Project Proponent:
Graphic Scale:
22°30'0"N
22°30'0"N
0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400 m
Date 24/08/2017
88°21'0"E 88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2017 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Study Area Map.mxd
88°18'0"E 88°21'0"E 88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E 88°36'0"E Key Map of West Bengal

22°42'0"N
22°42'0"N
Project Site
Scale: Not to Scale

22°39'0"N
22°39'0"N
Sunti Nadi Legend

9.5km Project Site
Bidyadhari
Nadi 6.5km
15km Buffer
Settlements
Streams
Hooghly River
9.4km
Roads
Forest
22°36'0"N
Waterbody
22°36'0"N
Bagiola Khal
0.5km
Vegetation
New Town Lake
Salt Lake 1.6km
Contours
3.5km Locations
East Kolkata
Wetlands 1.5km
Source:
Bidyadhari Khal
22°33'0"N
8.5km
22°33'0"N
Fort William
11.7km
Software Used:
Figure 3.2: Environment Sensitive Locations
Project:
Rabindra Sarovar New Town, District: Kolkata, West Bengal
12.0km
22°30'0"N
22°30'0"N
Project Proponent:
Graphic Scale:
0 1,200 2,400 4,800 7,200 9,600 m
22°27'0"N
22°27'0"N
Date 24/08/2017
88°18'0"E 88°21'0"E 88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E 88°36'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2017 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Env Sen Map.mxd
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Key Map of West Bengal
10 10 10
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
10
10
10
10 10
20

10
10
10
10
10
10
10 10
10 10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10 2
10 10
20 10
10
10
10
10
20 1
10
0 0
10
2
0
1 0 0
10
10 10 10 10 10 10
1
20
20
20
10
0
10 10
10
10 10 10 10 10
10
10
10
10
10 10 10
10
10 10 10 10 10 0 0 10 10
10
10
10 10
1 1
20
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10 10
10 10
0
10
10 0
10
0
10
1 0
0
1 1
10
2 10 10 10 10
0
10
10
10
0 10
10
10
10 10
10
20
10 0
1
1 0
10
2
10
10
1 1 10
10
1 0 10 0 0 1 10
10
10
30
0
20
0
20
10 20
1
20
10 1
10
0 1
10
1 0 0 10 10
10 10
2
10 0 2
10 10
20
10
10
10 10
10
0 0 1
10
1
10 10
10
1 0
0
10
10
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
1
10 10 10 0
10
0
10
20
0
22°39'0"N
1 0 20 1 1 1 1 10
10
10 10 0 10
10
10
10
10
20
2 0 0
10 10
10
10
1010
10
20
22°39'0"N
10
10 10 10 10
10
10 1 10 10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10 20
1
10
10
10 10 0 0 1 0 10
10
1 10 10 10
10
10
Project Site
10 2010 10 10
10
10 10
10
10
10 10
10 10
10 10 10
10
10
10
10 20
10
1010
10
10
10 0 10 10 10 0 10
20 10
10
10
20 2
1
10 110 1
10
10 10 10
10
1
10 10
10
10 20
10
10 10 10 0 0 10
10
10
10
10
10
1 0
10 10
10 10 10
1
10 10
10 0
10
0 0 0 10 3 10
0
10
2
10 10 10
10
1 0
10
0 1 1 1 0
10
1 2010 10 0 0 10 1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20 1 10
10
10 10
10
10 10
10
10
0 0 10
10
0 0 1 10 1
10
1 0
10 10
10
1
10
10
1 0 10 0
10
20
10
10
20
10
10
10 0 10 20
0
10 20
10
10
10 1 1 1 10 10
10 20 10 1
0
10
10 10
10
10 10 10 2 1 10
10
10
10
0 20 10 100
10
20
10
20
10
10
10
20
0
10
10 10
10 10
10
10
20
10
10 10 1 0
1
10
10
10 10 1 10
0 0
10
10
10 10
10
20
10
10
10 20 10 1 20 10 10 1020
10
0
10
10
20
10
10
20
10 10 10 10 10
20
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 10 0
10
0 10
10
10
1
10
10
10
2 1
10
10
20 0 10 1 0 0 0 10
10
10
2
10
1010 10
10
10 10 10 10
10
10
10
10
20
10 10
10
20 10
10 10
10
20
10 10
1
0
10 20 10 20
10 10 10
20
10 10
10
10
20
1
10
10
10
Scale: Not to Scale
10
1
10
10 1 0
10
10 10
20
0
10
10 10
10
0
10
0
10 20 10 10
1
10
20
10
1
20 0
10
10
10
1
10
10
10
20 10 10
10
3 1 1
20 10 10 0 10 10
10
20 0 10 0 10 0
10
10 10
20
10
10
10
10 10 20 10 0 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2 1
10 10
10
10
10
10 10
10 10
0
0 10 10 10
20
20
20
10
0
2
10
1
10
10
10
0 1 10 0
10
1
10 10 0 10 2
10 10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
2 20
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10 10
10
0
10
10
10
10 10 1
10
10
10 10
0
10
10
20
20 10
10
10
20
20 2
10
10 10
10 10
1
10 0 10 10
30
10
10
Legend
10
20
20
0 10
10 10
10
20
10
2
10
2 0 1 10
0
0
10
0
0 10
1 1 0
10
0
10
1 1
10
20
1 0 0 0
10
10
10 20 0220 1
10
10
10 0 10 10 10 1
10
10
10
10
10 10 10 10 10 10 1 20 10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
1 0
10
10 10 1
10
10 1
0
20
10
0
10
10
10 10
1
0
20
10 20 0 10 10
10 1
10
10
0
10 10 10
10
1 0
Contour
1
1
10
0
10
10 0 10
0
10
10
0 1
1
1 0 10
10 10
1
1 1 0
10
0 2
0
10
10
0 0 10 10 0
10
0
20 20
1 10
10
20
10
1010
1
10
1 10
10
10
20
10
10
2
10 10
0
20
10
10 1 10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20 20
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
0
20 10
10
10
20 10 10
0
20
Project Site
1
10
1
10 10
10
10
2
10
10
10
1
00
10 10
20
10
10
10
10
1 0 1
20
10
0 0 0 10 10
10
10 010 10 0
2
10 10 1 1
20
1
10
20 20
10
10 0 10
10
10
10
0
10
10
0
1 0 1
10
1
10
0
10
20
10
20
1 0 1
10 10
10
10
20 0
10
0
10
1
0
2 1 10 10
10
0
10 10
10
10 10 10 10 10
10
2
20
0
10
10km Buffer
1
10
10
10
1
10
10 10 10 10
10
20 10
10
10
0
10
20 10 10
10 20
10
30
10
10
10
1
0
10 10
10
1
10
0
10 10 20
10
10 10
1 0
0
0
30 0
10
20 10 10
10
1 2 0 1 10 10
10
2
20
10
10 10 10
2
10
10 10
0
0
10 1
10 10
10
0
10
10
10 0
20
20 10 2
10
22°36'0"N
10 10 2 20
10
1
30
20 10 10 10
20
10 10 0
10
20 10 10 10 10
10
10
0
10
10
10
1
10
10
1
20
10 10 10
22°36'0"N
10
0
0
10
10
10
2 10 10 10 10
20
10
10
0
10
30 10 10
1
10 1
20
10
10
10
2020 10
10
10
10
10
1
0 00 10
10
0 0 0 0
20
0 10
1 1
2 0
1 1
10
10
20
0
2 0 1 10 10 10 10
10
10
10
10
0 20 10
10
10
20 20
1
10
10
10
10
1
10 10 20
20 0
10
0
20 20
10
10
2 20 1 10
20
30
10 10 10
10
0
10
1
20 0 01 10
0
10
10
10
10
10 10
10 1 10
0 0
20 10 10 10 10
10 10 10
10 20
10
10 20
1
20
10
10
10
10 1
10
0
10
0
10
0 1
10
0
1
10
10
0 0
10
10
0 1 1 0
0
10 0 0
20
1 10 20 20 0 10 10
10
1
1
20 10 10
10
1
10
10 1
20
20
10 1
10
10
10
0
10 10
0
10 1
10
10
10
20 10
10
20
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
2
10
20
10
10
10
20 10
10 10 10
20
0 30
10
10
2 20 10 10
20
30 0
10
10
2
20 10
20
0
10
10 0
10
1
10
20
0
0
20 1 1
10 10
0
20 20 2
10
1 0 10
10
10
0
20 20
10
1 0 0 10
10
10 10
1
2
1
10
10
10 10
0
10
1
10
20
20
10 0
10
10
10
1
10 10 10
1010
20 10
10
20 20 10
1
20
0
1010
10
20 20 10 10
10
10
10 10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
20 2
10
10 10
10 2 0
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
20
10
10
10 10
10
0 0
10
10
10
10 1
10
10
20
10 20
10 20
20 20
1 1
10
0
10
10
10
0 2 10 10 0 0
10
0
20 10 20
10
0 20 20
20
10
10 0 20
1
10 1
0
10
10
2 10
10
10 10
1
10
20
10
0 20
10
10
1
10 10 1 10 10 10
20
10
10
10
10 10 10
10 0
1 20 1 1010 10 10 10
10
20 1
10 10
10
20 1
1
30
10
10
10 10
10
20 0 10 10 0 0 10 2 0
0
1 1 0
20
0 10 1
10
10 0
0 1 0 10
10
10
2
10 10
20
0 0
10
10
10 10
20
2 1
10
10
1
2
10
0 1
20
20
10
0
0
10
10
10 10 10
20
10 10 10
1
30
0
0
1
20 10
10 1
2 0
10
0
10
10 1
0
10
2 20
10
1
10 0 10
10
10
10 10
0 10
10 110 1
10
20
20 2
10
10 10 10 10
10
10 10
10
10 10 10
10
10
3030
10
10 1
10
10
20
10 10
10
10
20 1
20
10
0
10 10 10 10
10
20
10
0
20 20 10 10
10
10 0
10 10
10
10 30 20
10 1
10
10
0
0 10
10
10
10 10
10 0
1 20 1
10
10
1
10 0
10
0 0 10 1
10
0
10
10
20
10
10 0
1
20 1 10
10
20 20 30 20
1010
10
10
20
10
20
10
0 0
10
0
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10 10 10 10 10
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
101
20 20
10
20
10
20
10
10
10
10 20
20
0
10 20
0
20
10
10
0 10 0
20
10 10
10
20
10
10
1 10 1
1
10
10
20 0 10 10
10 10 10
20
10
20
1010
10
202 20 10
10
10 10
10
20 0 10 10
10
10
10
0
10
10 0
0
10
10
20
10
10
0 0 10
10 1 10
10 10 10
0
20
2
1
10
10
20 10
1 20 2 10
20
10
1
10
0
10
10
1 10 10
20
20 20
10
2
10 10
10
10 2
0
10 10 1
20
1
10 10
0
10 10
10
10
10
10
0
10 10 0 1 0
0
1
20
10
1 0 10
10 10
1
10
1
0 0
10
0 1
1
2 20 0
1
10
0
1
0 1
0
20
0
10
10 10
0 1
10
0
1
10
4 1
20
0 0
10
1
0
10 10
10
10 1 10
20
20
10
1
10
2
0 0 10 20 2 10 10
10
0 1
0 10
2
10
0 2 1
20
10
0 1 0
10
0 1
10 10
10
10
2 0
0 0
1
Source:
20 3 0
20
10
10
10
10
10 1
10 10
20 0 20 2 0 10 10 20
60
10 10
1
20
10
10 10 20
20 1 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 10 10
10
40 10 20
10
20 10 20
20
10 20
30
20
10
10
10
50
20
10 2 20 2
0 10
0 1
0 10 10
30
10
20 0 0 10 1
20 10
10
1 1 0 1 1 10 10 20
10
2 0 0 1 10 1 10 0 10
10
20
10
10
10
20 10 210
1
1 0
1
10
10 10
10
0 0 1
10
10 1
10
10 20 0 1 0
10
10 10 20 0 20 0 10 10
20
0
10
20 10
10
0
10
0
0 10 0 0
0
10
20 1 20 0
20 1
0
10
1 1 2
10
1

1
10
0
0
1 1 0
20
10
20 0 0 10 5060 10 0 1 10 10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10 10
10
1
1
10
10 10 0 1 30 220
10
10
10
10
10 10 10 10 0 10
10
10
10 1
20
10
10
10 1
10
10 10 2 10
10
10 10
10 1
0
10 20
10
10 80 1
10
10 10
30
10
101 10 10
10
20
10 1
0 10 20 10
10
1 0 10 4 20 0
20
0 1
10 10
10
1 1
10
0 0 1 0
10
10
0
10
40 2
2
60
1
10
10
10 20 10 0 1 0 0
10 10 10
0
10
0
0
40
0 1
20
0
Software Used:
10
20 1
10
60
0
10 10
10
20
2 10
10
360 10 10
20 1
0
10
10
1
10 10 10
10
10
1
20
10 10
20
10
10
10 0 0 0 1
20
1 0 0
10
1
10
0 2 10 1 30 2 3 10
10
0 10
1
10
10 20 10 1 10 10 1
10
22°33'0"N
10
10
20 20
10
20 20
10
10 10
0
0 0
0
80
10
90
10
0 20 101 10
50
10
10
10 10
20
10
10
10 10
20
10 10 10
30 10
10 1
1
10
10
10 10
0
0 10
10
22°33'0"N
4
0
10
10
10
10
20
2 0 1 0 0
10
3
10
10
30
10
2 10 10
10
0 1
20
10
0
10 10
0 0 0 10
10
1 0 0 10
10
10
2 10 0
10 10 10
10 10 2 3 1 30 10
0
10
40
10 10 10
10
10
10 10
20
10
Contour Map of Study Area

10
10
10
Figure 3.3:
1
10
10
10
10
30
10
30 10 20
10 10
10
10
10 10
10 0 10 10 0 20 20
10
10
10
10
10 20 10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
20
20 10
10
1
10 10 10 20
10
0 10 1 1
10 1
0
10
0 1 10
10
10 1
1 2 0
20
0
20
2 30 1 0
10
0
10
10
10 1 0
10
10
20 20
10
10
20
0 1
20
10
0
10
10
10
10
10
0
10 10
2
20 10 1 1
10
10 2 7
10 20
0 0 0 0
1 10 3 0 8
10 1 10 101
10
0
10 10 10
10 20 1
10 10 1 10 1 10 10
10
10 10
10
10
0
20
10
0
10 10
6050
30
10
10
10
1
0
10
10 0 10 10
10
0 10
10 Project:
0 50
10 30 10
10
10
0 10
10 10
10
10 1 101
40
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
10
10
2 1 1
10
10
10
10 1
10 0 10
10
10
10
10
40 4
20
10
10 10
10 10 101
10
30
0 10
20
10
10
20 10
20
10
10
10
10
10 10
1 0 0
10
0 Dongfang Electrict (India) Pvt Ltd

10
20
1 2 0
10
30
0 0 10 0
10
1 2 101 1 0 10
1 1 10 10 10
1
10
10
10
10
10
0
10
10 10
20
20 0 10 0 10 10
0
10 0
040 230
10 10
10
20
10
10
30 10 10
20
10
10
10 10 10
10 New Town, District: Kolkata, West Bengal

10
10
10
20
3 0 0
10
10
10
10
10
1
0
1
10
10 1 0
10
10
0
10
10
10
10
1
10
10
10 10 0 10 10
10
10
1
10 1 20 10 20 10
1
10
20
10
1 2
10
10
10 10
10
1 20 10 0 0
10
10
10
10 10
0
2020
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 10
3
10
20
10 Project Proponent:
30
20
0
10
0
1 10 10 10 10
10
10
10 10 10 20
10
1 0
10 0
20
0
10
1
101
0 1 1 1
10 10
10
10 1 10 10 0 0
10 10
10 20
10
10 1
1010
10
10 10
10
10 10
20
20 10
10
10
10 10 10 10 0 10 10
30
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 20 10
10
10
10
20
10 10
10
20
10 1 10 30
2
0
10
10
10
1 10 10
10 10
10 0
10
10
10 10 0 10 10 10 10
10
10 0 10 10
10
0
10
1
10
10
10 101
10
10
20
10
1
10
10
10
10 10 2
10 10
10
10
0
10 1
10 110 10 0
10
10
10 10
10
10
30
10
10
0 10
10
20
1 0
10
10
10
10
10
10 20
10
10
1 1
20
10
10 20
10 10 0 2
10
20 0 Environment Consultant:
10
0 0
10
10
10
20 10
10
0
10
10
10102 10 1
10
10 10
10
30 0 0 1
10
10
10
0
10
10
10
10
10
10 0
10
10
10
10 10
1
10
10
1 10
20
0 0 10 1 10 10
10
10
10
10
10 10 0 10
30
1
10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
0
10
10
20
10 1010 10 10 10 10
1
10 0
20
10
10 10 0
10
10
10
1 1
10 1
20 0 (An ISO:9001 QMS, ISO: 14001 EMS & OHSAS: 18001 H&S MS Certified by BSI)
10 10
10
10 10 10
0
10 20 10
20
10
10
10 10
10
10
1
10
10
10 10
10
10 0 10 10 0
1
20
10
10

10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
0
20 2 10
10
0
10
10 1
10
10 10 10
1 0 10 20
10 2
1 1
10
10 10 0 0 0
10
10
10
20
10
10 10
20
10 10 20
20
Graphic Scale:
10 20
10
10
10
0
0
10
10 1
10 10
10
1 2
10
10
10 10 0
201
10 20 0
0
10
10 0
10
10
10
1
10
0 1 10
10
10
10 1
10
10
10 10 1
10
10
0 10 10 10 10
10
10 10
1
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 m

10 10
0
20
10
10
1 0 10
10
10 0 1 10
0
0
10
10 0
10 20
0 1
10
1 1 2
22°30'0"N
1 10
10 10 10 10 10 10
10
10 20
10
1010 10 10
10
10
22°30'0"N
10
10
10
10
10 1
10
10

10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10 10 10
20 20 10
10
10 10
10
10
20
0 10
10
10 0
10
10
1
10
0
2
10
10
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 10
10
10
10
10
Date 07/12/2018
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2018 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Contour Map.mxd

22°39'0"N
22°39'0"N
Project Site
Scale: Not to Scale

Legend
Project Site
10km Buffer
Elevation (m)
3-9
22°36'0"N
22°36'0"N
10 - 13
14 - 19
20 - 30
31 - 52
53 - 99
Source:
Software Used:
22°33'0"N
22°33'0"N
Figure 3.4: Slope Map of study Area
Project:
Project Proponent:
Graphic Scale:
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 m
22°30'0"N
22°30'0"N
Date 07/12/2018
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2018 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Slope Map.mxd

Chandigarh
Bankra DarialaBirpur
Chandigari
Ganti Jojra
Rohanda
Majherhati Kadahati
22°39'0"N
Barpol
22°39'0"N
Netaji Subhas Palitpara Kaipul Project Site

Sultanpur Chandra Bose
International Airport Bamun Bil
Noapara
Subhashnagar Gopalpur Rajbati Deara
Bi Galasi
Raygachhi dy
SH 3 ad
Rajarhat hari Kharibariya Scale: Not to Scale
Bediapara Kaikhali Na Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/

di
Sinthi Matijhil Kajalpara
Satchasipara Atghara Legend
Nawabpur
Major Roads
Dum Dum Basina Bagdoba Bil Airport Area
ver
Chyamnagar Minor Roads

Paikpara Brick Kiln
NH
Chitpur
l i Ri
1
NH 3 Jyangra Chandpur Railway Line Open Land
SH
12
Hu g
Jamalpara Tramways Waste Land
22°36'0"N
Lake Town New Town Lake Moktarpur
22°36'0"N
Bagbazar Project Site Open Scrub/Park

Umarhati Shikharpur
Krishnapur Ghuni 10km Buffer
Arbeliya Wooded Area
Ke
Ultadanga Salt Lake City Kadampur Kashinathpur Waterbody

sh
Simla Chandiberiya Marshy Land

t
Gouranganagar
op
Baiduni Builtup Agriculture Land

ur
Maniktala Naoyabad
Industries
C
Kestopur Khal
Jatragachhi Teghariya
Ciroula
an
Taruliya Hudarait
a
Noabad Ganragari
l
Ba
New Town
Keserait
gi
Kisha Nagar Patharghata Kada
ol
r Can
Purbachal
a
Thakurdwari
Kh
Kadapara Balighari Tarahadiya al Source:
h
al
Baubazar Dhapa Manpur P Abuya ari K 1. SoI Toposheet No. 79B/6, 79B/7, 79B/10 & 79B/11
al
Chhapna 2. Project Layout Plan, DEIPL

h 3. Data Provided by FAE (LU)
Dhapa Bil Akanda Kesari yad 4. Google Satellite Imagery, 2017
d
Pagladanga Nabapalli Bi Software Used:
Gobtala 1. ArcGIS 10.1, 2. AutoCAD 2012, 3. ER Mapper 7, 4. Erdas Imagine 10
22°33'0"N
East Kolkata Wetlands Panchuriya
22°33'0"N
Entali
Figure 3.7: Landuse Pattern of Study Area
Kuberiya
GobraTyangra
Hatgachha Gabtala
Hatisala Project:
Mirania Lake
Durgapur Shribaltala
Bosetala New Town, District: Kolkata, West Bengal
Kanthalberiya
SH-3 Eas Bablapara Project Proponent:
Bededanga
te
rn C
Chaubaga ana Beonta
l
Bantala Bamanghata
Rajdanga Dadupara
Dakshin
Kanchagheri QCI-NABET Accrediate Environment Consultant Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA0058
Rubi ParkAnandapur Goalbati Khojdanga Kantatala
Graphic Scale:
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 m
Kalikapur Hetosara Babupara
22°30'0"N
Chahhepota Bajbantala
22°30'0"N

Kheyadaha
Hanripota
Date 30/03/2018
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2018 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\LU Map.mxd

Chandigarh
Chandigari
Ganti Jojra
Rohanda
Majherhati Kadahati
22°39'0"N
Barpol
22°39'0"N

Noapara
Bi Galasi
Raygachhi dy
SH 3 ad

di
Satchasipara Atghara
Nawabpur Legend
Dum Dum Basina Bagdoba Bil Soil Sampling Locations
ver
Chyamnagar
Paikpara
NH
Chitpur Major Road
l i Ri
1
NH 3 Jyangra Chandpur
SH
Minor Road
12
Hu g
Jamalpara Railway Line
22°36'0"N
22°36'0"N
Bagbazar
Umarhati Shikharpur Project Site
Krishnapur Ghuni
Arbeliya
Ke
Ultadanga Salt Lake City 10km Buffer

Kadampur
sh
Chandiberiya Kashinathpur Builtup

Simla
to
Gouranganagar Baiduni
pu
Maniktala Ca Naoyabad Industries

S3
r
na
Jatragachhi Teghariya Airport Area
Ciroula
l Taruliya
Noabad S4Mohishgot S1 Ganragari
Hudarait
Waterbody
Ba
New Town
Keserait
gi
Kisha Nagar S2 Patharghata Kada
ol
r Can
Purbachal
a
Thakurdwari
Kh
Kadapara Balighari Tarahadiya al Source:
h
al
al

d
22°33'0"N
22°33'0"N
Entali
Figure 3.8: Soil Sampling Location Map
Kuberiya
GobraTyangra
Hatgachha Gabtala
Hatisala Project:
Mirania Lake
Kanthalberiya
Bededanga
te
rn C
Chaubaga ana Beonta
l
Bantala Bamanghata
Rajdanga Dadupara
Dakshin
Graphic Scale:
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 m
22°30'0"N
22°30'0"N

Kheyadaha
Hanripota
Date 07/12/2018
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2018 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Soil.mxd

Chandigarh
Dariala Birpur
Bankra Chandigari
Ganti Jojra
Rohanda
Majherhati Kadahati
22°39'0"N
Barpol
22°39'0"N
Palitpara Kaipul Project Site

Sultanpur
Bamun Bil
Noapara
Bi Galasi
Raygachhi dy
ad
Rajarhathar Kharibariya Scale: Not to Scale
Bediapara Kaikhali iN Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/
ad West_Bengal_Election_2011.svg/2000px-West_Bengal_Election_2011.svg.png
Sinthi Matijhil i
Satchasipara Atghara Kajalpara
Nawabpur
Ke
Legend
Dum Dum Basina Bagdoba Bil
st
er
Chyamnagar
o
Paikpara Streams
pu
li Riv
Chitpur
Chandpur
rK
Jyangra Project Site

ha
Hu g
Jamalpara 10km Buffer

l
22°36'0"N
Lake Town Moktarpur
22°36'0"N
Bagbazar New Town Lake Builtup

Umarhati Shikharpur
Krishnapur Ghuni
Arbeliya Marshy Land
Ultadanga Salt Lake City Kadampur
K Kashinathpur Waterbody
es Chandiberiya
Simla ht Gouranganagar Baiduni
op
Maniktala ur Naoyabad
l
ana
Ciroul ar C a na
C Taruliya
an Jatragachhi Teghariya
Hudarait
1C
Noabad al Ganragari
Ba
l
New Town
ase
na
gi
Kisha Nagar Patharghata Keserait
ol
Ca
Kada
Ph
Purbachal
a
Kadapara Thakurdwari
K
ata
Balighari Tarahadiya
al
ha
Source:
h
l
h

Baubazar Dhapa Manpur P Chhapna Abuya ri K
leg
l

a
dh
3. Data Provided by FAE (HG)
Akanda Kesari
Be
Dhapa Bil a 4. Google Satellite Imagery, 2017

dy
22°33'0"N
22°33'0"N
Entali
Figure 3.9: Drainage Map of Study Area
Kuberiya
Gobra Tyangra
Hatgachha Gabtala
Mirania Lake Hatisala Project:
Kanthalberiya
Bablapara
Bededanga Project Proponent:
Eas
tern
Ca Beonta
Chaubaga nal
Bantala Bamanghata
Rajdanga Dadupara
Dakshin
Rubi Park Anandapur Goalbati Khojdanga Kantatala
Graphic Scale:
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 m
KalikapurChahhepota Hetosara Babupara
22°30'0"N
Bajbantala
22°30'0"N

Kheyadaha
Hanripota
Date 07/03/2018
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2018 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Drainage Map.mxd

Chandigarh
Chandigari
Ganti Jojra
Rohanda
Majherhati Kadahati
22°39'0"N
Barpol
22°39'0"N

Noapara
Bi Galasi
Raygachhi dy
SH 3 ad

di
Nawabpur
Ground Water Sampling Locations
ver
Chyamnagar Surface Water Sampling Locations

Paikpara
NH
Chitpur
l i Ri
4 Major Road
1
SH
12
Minor Road
Hu g
Jamalpara
22°36'0"N
Lake Town New Town Lake Moktarpur Railway Line
22°36'0"N
Bagbazar
Umarhati Shikharpur
Krishnapur Ghuni Project Site
Arbeliya
Ke
Ultadanga Salt Lake City Kadampur 10km Buffer

sh
Chandiberiya Kashinathpur
Simla
to
Gouranganagar Builtup
Baiduni
pu
Maniktala Ca Naoyabad
r
GW1 Industries
na SW3
Jatragachhi Teghariya
Ciroula
l Taruliya Airport Area

Noabad Hudarait
Mohishgot SW1 Ganragari
Ba
New Town Waterbody
GW3 Keserait
gi
ol
r Can
Purbachal
a
SW2 Thakurdwari
Kh
Kadapara Balighari Tarahadiya al
GW2 h Source:
al
al

d
22°33'0"N
22°33'0"N
Entali
Figure 3.10: Water Sampling Location Map
Kuberiya
GobraTyangra
Hatgachha Gabtala
Hatisala Project:
Mirania Lake
Kanthalberiya
Bededanga
te
rn C
Chaubaga ana Beonta
l
Bantala Bamanghata
Rajdanga Dadupara
Dakshin
Graphic Scale:
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 m
22°30'0"N
22°30'0"N

Kheyadaha
Hanripota
Date 07/12/2018
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2018 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Water.mxd

Chandigarh
Chandigari
Ganti Jojra
Rohanda
Majherhati Kadahati
22°39'0"N
Barpol
22°39'0"N

Noapara
Bi Galasi
Raygachhi dy
SH 3 ad

di
Nawabpur
Air Monitoring Locations
ver
Chyamnagar Major Road

Paikpara
NH
Chitpur
l i Ri
1
NH 3 Jyangra Chandpur Minor Road
SH
12
Hu g
Railway Line
Jamalpara
22°36'0"N
22°36'0"N
Bagbazar Project Site

Umarhati Shikharpur
Krishnapur Ghuni 10km Buffer
Arbeliya
Ke
Ultadanga Salt Lake City Kadampur Kashinathpur Builtup

sh
Simla Chandiberiya
t
Gouranganagar
op
Baiduni Industries
AAQ4
ur
Maniktala Naoyabad
AAQ6 Airport Area
C
Taruliya AAQ1 Jatragachhi Teghariya

Ciroula
an
Hudarait Waterbody
a
Noabad
Mohishgot New TownAAQ5 Ganragari
l
AAQ3
Ba
gi
Kada
r Can
Purbachal
ol
AAQ7 Thakurdwari
a
Kh
AAQ2 h Source:
Abuya ari K
al
Baubazar Dhapa Manpur P
al

d
22°33'0"N
22°33'0"N
Entali
Figure 3.16: Air Monitoring Location Map
Kuberiya
GobraTyangra
Hatgachha Gabtala
Hatisala Project:
Mirania Lake
Kanthalberiya
Bededanga
te
rn C
Chaubaga ana Beonta
l
Bantala Bamanghata
Rajdanga Dadupara
Dakshin
Graphic Scale:
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 m
22°30'0"N
22°30'0"N

Kheyadaha
Hanripota
Date 07/12/2018
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2018 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Air.mxd

Chandigarh
Chandigari
Ganti Jojra
Rohanda
Majherhati Kadahati
22°39'0"N
Barpol
22°39'0"N

Noapara
Bi Galasi
Raygachhi dy
SH 3 ad

di
Nawabpur Legend
Dum Dum Basina Bagdoba Bil Noise Monitoring Locations
ver
Chyamnagar
Paikpara
NH
Chitpur Major Road
l i Ri
1
SH
Minor Road
12
Hu g
22°36'0"N
22°36'0"N
Bagbazar
Krishnapur Ghuni
Arbeliya 10km Buffer
Ke
Ultadanga Salt Lake City Kadampur Kashinathpur

sh
Simla Chandiberiya Builtup

t
Gouranganagar
op
Baiduni Industries
N4
ur
Maniktala Naoyabad
N6
C
Jatragachhi Teghariya Airport Area

Ciroula
an
Taruliya N1 Hudarait
a
Noabad N5 Ganragari
l
Waterbody
N3
Mohishgot New Town
Ba
gi
Kada
r Can
Purbachal
ol
Thakurdwari
a
Kh
N7 N2 Abuya ari K
h Source:
al
Baubazar Dhapa Manpur P
al

d
22°33'0"N
22°33'0"N
Entali
Figure 3.17: Noise Monitoring Location Map
Kuberiya
GobraTyangra
Hatgachha Gabtala
Hatisala Project:
Mirania Lake
Kanthalberiya
Bededanga
te
rn C
Chaubaga ana Beonta
l
Bantala Bamanghata
Rajdanga Dadupara
Dakshin
Graphic Scale:
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 m
22°30'0"N
22°30'0"N

Kheyadaha
Hanripota
Date 07/12/2018
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2018 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Noise.mxd

Chandigarh
Chandigari
Ganti Jojra
Rohanda
Majherhati Kadahati
22°39'0"N
Barpol
22°39'0"N

Noapara
Bi Galasi
Raygachhi dy
SH 3 ad
Bediapara Kaikhali Na West_Bengal_Election_2011.svg/2000px-West_Bengal_Election_2011.svg.png
di
Nawabpur Legend
Dum Dum Basina Bagdoba Bil Traffic Monitoring Locations
ver
Chyamnagar
Paikpara
NH
Chitpur Major Road
li Ri
1
SH
Minor Road
12
Hug
22°36'0"N
22°36'0"N
Bagbazar
Krishnapur Ghuni
Arbeliya
Ke
Ultadanga Salt Lake City 10km Buffer

Kadampur
sh
Chandiberiya Kashinathpur Builtup

Simla
to p
Gouranganagar Baiduni Industries

ur
Maniktala Ca Naoyabad
na
T2 Jatragachhi Teghariya Airport Area
Ciroula
l Taruliya
Noabad T1 Ganragari
Hudarait
Waterbody
Ba
Mohishgot New Town
Keserait
gi
ol
r Can
Purbachal
a
Thakurdwari
Kh
Kadapara Balighari Tarahadiya l
ha Source:
al
Baubazar Dhapa Manpur P Abuya ar i K 1. SoI Toposheet No. 79B/6, 79B/7, 79B/10 & 79B/11
al

Dhapa Bil Akanda Kesari y ad 4. Google Satellite Imagery, 2017
d
22°33'0"N
22°33'0"N
Entali
Figure 3.20: Traffic Monitoring Location Map
Kuberiya
GobraTyangra
Hatgachha Gabtala
Hatisala Project:
Mirania Lake
Kanthalberiya
Bededanga
t ern
Can Beonta Dongfang Electrict (India) Pvt Ltd
Chaubaga a l
Bantala Bamanghata
Rajdanga Dadupara
Dakshin (An ISO:9001 QMS, ISO: 14001 EMS & OHSAS: 18001 H&S MS Certified by BSI)
Graphic Scale:
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000 m
22°30'0"N
22°30'0"N

Kheyadaha
Hanripota
Date 07/12/2018
88°24'0"E 88°27'0"E 88°30'0"E 88°33'0"E Revision
© GREENCINDIA Consulting Private Limited, 2018 Path: D:\Project II\Landuse\Dongfang\Shp-10\Traffic.mxd
CHAPTER 4
ANTICIPATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
4. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS & MITIGATION
MEASURES
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The assessment of potential environmental impact consists of comparing the expected changes in the
environment due to the project. This chapter assesses the nature, type and magnitude of the potential
impacts likely on the various relevant physical, biological, social and cultural components due to
operation of the project. The environmental, biological, ecological and social impacts can be direct
as well as indirect. The direct area of influence includes the site for the project and surrounding area.
The impacts on various environmental components can occur at operation stage of the project
planning and implementation.
4.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF IMPACTS

Pollutants generated during the operation phase of the development either be liquid, solid and
gaseous in nature. The generation of pollution may be periodic, continuous or accidental. The phase
wise description of impacts by the proposed project is given in Table 4.1.
Table 4-1: Description of Impacts during Operation Phase
Sl. No. Activity/Area Pollutant Description Frequency
1 Vehicular movement Air emission & noise Vehicle exhaust Continuous / Periodic
generation emissions
DG set Air emission-PM, SO2, Fuel burning Periodic- in case of
NO2 & CO power failure
Noise generation From DG set
Hazardous waste Used oil generation Periodic - during oil
change
2 Residential/commerci Waste water Domestic sewage Continuous
al activities Solid waste Municipal solid waste
3 Sewage Treatment Solid Waste Settled and stabilized Continuous
Plant sludge
4 Vehicle parking area Oil spills Minor oil leaks in Continuous-small
parking lot quantities
5 Storm water Wastewater Discharge containing During rainy season
drains mainly suspended
solid

4.3 IMPACT ASSESSMENT & MITIGATION MEASURES

4.3.1 Operation Phase
During the operation phase, there might be impacts on the air, water and land environment and socio-
economic aspects. The subsequent sections present the adverse, beneficial, short term and long term
impacts due to the operation of the project.
4.3.1.1 Land-Use
The land for project development was allotted by West Bengal Housing Development Corporation.
Land-use of the project site is as per the master plan. Moreover, the site had no trees which required
tree felling. The site was a vacant land and did not require shifting of any utilities or infrastructure.
4.3.1.2 Air Environment

During the operation phase of the project, the major impact will be from DG set. The air pollutants of
concern from the DG Sets emissions are Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), un-burnt Carbon (CO) and Oxides
of Nitrogen (NO2) as per CPCB guidelines.
There is provision of 2 DG sets of 650 kVA each installed within the project premises for power
back-up. Pollution load has been calculated assuming that low Sulphur content diesel will be used as
fuel. Stack height of the DG set has been considered as 30 m as minimum permissible height allowed
as per CPCB Standards. This is provided as input to a Gaussian point source Model used with hourly
meteorological conditions for dispersion modelling described hereafter. The estimated exhaust
emissions characteristics from DG sets are presented in Table 4.2.
Table 4-2: Emission Details
Capacity of DG Set (kVA)
Parameters Units
650
Number of DG Sets No. 2
Stack Height m 30
Stack Diameter m 0.35
Stack exit velocity m/s 32.6
Flue Gas Temperature 0K 773
Emission Load
SO2 @ 0.005 % Sulphur in g/s 0.003
Diesel
NO 2 @ 9.2 g/kw-hr g/s 1.33
CO @ 3.5 g/kw-hr g/s 0.51
PM g/s 0.04
Air Dispersion Modelling-emission from DG Sets
For obtaining short-term incremental ground level concentration (GLC) within study area, US EPA
approved AERMOD Cloud5 has been used for the project. This is an air dispersion-modelling
package, which seamlessly incorporates the popular USEPA Models, ISCST3 and AERMOD into

one interface without any modifications to the models. These models are used extensively to assess
pollution concentration and deposition from a Point source.
Meteorological Data:
In order to conduct a refined air dispersion modelling project using the AERMOD short-term air
quality dispersion model, it is necessary to process the meteorological data representative of the
study area being modelled. The collected meteorological data is not always in the format supported
by the model, therefore the meteorological data needs to be pre-processed using AERMET program.
The AERMET program is a meteorological pre-processor, which prepares hourly surface data and
upper air data for use in the AERMOD air quality dispersion model. AERMET is designed to allow
future enhancements to process other types of data and to compute boundary layer parameters with
different algorithms.
AERMET processes meteorological data in three stages and from this process two files are generated
for use with the AERMOD model. A surface file of hourly boundary layer parameters estimates a
profile file of multiple-level observations of wind speed, wind direction, temperature and standard
deviation of the fluctuating wind components.
Presentation of Results:
The incremental concentrations are estimated for the study period representing summer season. The
results of present baseline values and predicted additional values of ground level concentrations for
NO2 and CO are presented in Table 4.3. The incremental concentration of SO2 and PM was too low
to be plotted.
The isopleths of predicted value of additional concentration of all parameters in microgram/m 3 are
shown as Annex 4.1 & 4.2 respectively with contribution from DG set.
Table 4-3: Resultant 24 hourly (except CO) 98 P Ground Level Concentration (GLC) during Project
Operation in µg/m3
Predicted
Distance (km)
Monitored GLCs Incremental Resultant GLCs

Direction
GLCs
Station Name
CO CO CO
NO2 NO2 NO2
(8 hr) (8 hr) (8 hr)
AAQ1: Project Site - - 34.5 1.12 2 2 36.5 3.12
AAQ2: Thakurdwari S 1.12 27.7 1 * * 27.7 1
AAQ3: Mohishgot SW 0.7 35.9 1.16 1 0.5 36.9 1.66
AAQ4: AB Block N 0.68 37.1 0.95 12 5 49.1 5.95
AAQ5: BF Block ESE 1.5 41.8 1.25 1 * 42.8 1.25
AAQ6: Tarulia WNW 1.8 35.3 1.23 2.5 * 37.8 1.23
AAQ7: Krishna Nagar SW 1.3 35.9 0.95 0.5 * 36.4 0.95
NAAQS 80 2000

Note: * indicates insignificant value
As evident from Table 4.3, NO2 is contributing maximum among the pollutants analysed although
the GLC of NO2 is well within the prescribed standard.
The model was run for the worst case scenario. The maximum resultant GLC of NO2 (49.1 µg/m3)
and CO (5.95 µg/m3) among the monitored locations has been found to occur at AAQ4 (AB Block).
The highest concentration of NO2 (12 µg/m3) & CO (5 µg/m3) also occurs in the same location (AB
Block) towards Northern direction which is the dominant downwind direction.
Dispersion Modelling-emission from Vehicles

After the project will start operation, it is expected that the traffic increase from the project will get
diverted towards both the locations where traffic volume count was surveyed (T1 and T2 as showing
Figure 3.20). The existing traffic load on the T1 and T2 as found during survey done in April, 2018
is 1780 PCU/hour and 2696 PCU/hour respectively.
It is estimated that the project is going to add another 11 PCU/hour. Considering 70% flow along T1
and remaining 30% flow along T2, an increase of 8 PCU/hour will occur in T1 and 3 PCU/hour
along T2.
A line source modelling has been carried out to study the impact on air quality around the 1 km area
of both the roads (T1 and T2). The extent of these impacts, at any given time, depends upon (i) the
rate of vehicular emission within a given stretch of the road and (ii) the prevailing meteorological
conditions. The impacts have strong temporal dependence as both of these factors vary with time.
The temporal dependence would have diurnal, seasonal as well as long term components. The
existing and the predicted traffic volumes have been considered to project future air quality scenarios
to provide an indication of variations in air quality.
The emission factors reported in this study are based on BS-IV certified diesel cars for which the
predicted ground level concentrations of Sulfur di-oxide, CO, and HC+NOx has been estimated on
24 hours basis. The model has been run on the basis of total no. of PCUs (i.e., 1788 & 2699) that will
be plying on both the roads after the project shall start operation considering wind speed of 4 km/hr
and stability class C. The predicted ground level concentration of gases is given in Table 4.4.
Table 4-4: Comparison between Pollution Load before and after Project Scenario
GLC 24hr (μg/m3) BS IV
T1: Near Ruchi Sheraton Hotel T2: Near Salt Lake Bypass
Pollutant Distance (m) (0.54 km, E) (2 km, W)
Before
Before project After project After project
project
NOx+HC 100 10 11 16 16
200 5 5 8 8
300 4 4 5 5
400 3 3 5 5
500 3 3 4 4

GLC 24hr (μg/m3) BS IV
Pollutant Distance (m) T1: Near Ruchi Sheraton Hotel T2: Near Salt Lake Bypass
(0.54 km, E) (2 km, W)
600 2 2 4 4
700 2 2 3 3
800 2 2 3 3
900 2 2 2 2
SO2 100 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5
200 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
300 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
400 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
500 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
600 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
700 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
800 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
900 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
CO 100 59 59 90 90
200 30 30 45 45
300 20 20 30 30
400 17 17 26 26
500 15 15 22 22
600 13 13 20 20
700 11 11 16 16
800 10 10 15 15
900 9 9 14 14
It is evident from the above table the impact due to vehicle movement shall remain same with almost
no increase in ground level concentration due to vehicles on either side of transporting road.
4.3.1.3 NOISE
The major sources of noise during the operational phase are
pollution.

4.3.1.4 Solid Waste

The total solid waste generation during operation phase will be 105 kg per day. The solid waste will
comprise of biodegradable waste e.g. domestic waste, food waste, horticultural waste etc. and
recyclable waste, like plastic, paper, tin, glass etc.
The Organic waste converter is a machine used for the treatment and recycling of solid and liquid
refuse material. A converter is a self-contained system capable of performing the following
functions: pasteurization of organic waste; sterilization of pathogenic or biohazard waste; grinding
and pulverization of refuse into unrecognizable output; trash compaction; dehydration.
Because of the wide variety of functions available on converters, this technology has found
application in diverse waste-producing industrial segments.
BENEFITS OF ORGANIC WASTE CONVERTER

 Large quantity of solid waste is converted to fertilizer in a very short period
 This fertilizer can be sold as compost to farmers, or used for gardening
 Machine requires less space and the efficiency is high
 Manpower and maintenance is very less
 This is one of the latest techniques of managing solid waste.

4.3.1.5 Water Quality

The total water requirement during operation phase will be 79 KLD of which 50 KLD will be fresh
water requirement while 29 KLD of treated water shall be required for flushing, Landscaping and
miscellaneous use. The fresh water required during operation shall be supplied by New Town
of 40 KLD using MBBR technology.
 Rainwater harvesting shall be carried out to recharge ground water.
Rainwater Harvesting Details:

Rainwater harvesting is a mechanism involving collection, storing and making use of rainwater when
it is most needed. A rainwater harvesting system comprises of various stages - transporting rainwater
through pipes or drains, filtration, and storage in tanks for reuse or recharging the ground water.
The project site have developed Rainwater harvesting pit of size 350 m 3, which will collect 3 days of
peak rainfall. Approximately 129.88m3 per day of water will be stored during peak rainy month. The
factors considered for RWH tank designing is given in Table 4.5 and Rain Water Harvesting
calculation is given in Table 4.6.
Table 4-5: Factors considered for RWH Tank Designing
Factors considered for tank designing

Wettest month as per IMD Report July
Total rainfall during that month mm 399.9
Peak daily rainfall of the wettest month in mm/day 13.3
Table 4-6: Rain water Harvesting

Area
Runoff Runoff Size of RWH No. of days of
S.no Description Considered
Coefficient (KLD) Storage(m3) storage
in m2
1 Roof Top area 3076.4 0.9 35.72
2 Paved Area 10041.4 0.6 77.72
3 Green area 6374.85 0.2 16.45 350 3
Total 129.88

4.3.1.6 Traffic & Transport
With the operation of the project, the traffic in the area is likely to increase, particularly during the
operation phase. The increase in traffic may create congestion, potential delays and inconvenience
for pedestrians and residents accessing the localities.
As per Indian Road Congress (IRC) Standards and based on the existing traffic scenario as
mentioned in Chapter 3, the level of service has been determined and shown in Table 4.7.
Table 4-7: Existing Level of Service
V = Volume C = Suggested LoS as
Distance V/C
Direction in PCU per design capacity per
(km) ratio
Location hour in PCU/hour IRC
T1: Near Ruchi
0.54 E 1780 3600 0.49 C
Sheraton Hotel
T2: Near Salt
2 W 2696 3600 0.75 D
Lake bypass
Relation between V/C ratio & LoS
V/C
LoS Performance
Ratio
0.0-0.2 A Represents a condition of free flow
0.2-0.4 B Represents a zone of stable flow
0.4-0.6 C The general level of comfort and convenience declines noticeably at this level
0.6-0.8 D Represents the limit of stable flow
0.8-1.0 E Represents operating condition when traffic volumes are at or close to the capacity level
From the survey, it is clear that both the roads surveyed represent a condition of stable flow.
Post-project Level of Service

The project has facilities for providing parking for 260 ECS Car Parking and 4 Bus parking space. It
is assumed that about 187 vehicles (70% of total ECS) at the peak hour will move towards salt lake
bypass road (T2) when the project would be operational and remaining 30% (77 vehicles) may move
towards T1. The total additional PCU in both the surveyed roads is given in Table 4.8.
Table 4-8: Level of Service after Expansion
T1: Near Ruchi Sheraton
Description T2: Near Salt Lake bypass
Hotel
Existing PCU per hour 1780 2696
Additonal PCU per day 185 79
Additional PCU per hour 8 3
Total PCU per hour when proposed
1788 2699
project would be operational
V/C ratio 0.50 0.7
LoS D D

The surveyed roads, as it seems from Table 4.6, have adequate capacity to accommodate the
incremental traffic load as a result of this project.
Traffic Management:
 All vehicles will be parked in designated parking area only.
 Optimizing use of roads at any particular time by planning vehicle movements.
 Road crossings to be used will be well marked and signalled.
 Information and warning signages will be retro-reflective type and clearly visible in the night.
 Marshals will be deployed to guide the vehicles and stop vehicles to avoid traffic jam.
4.3.1.7 Ecological Environment

There is no National Parks or Wildlife Sanctuaries within the study area. For estimation of the
adverse impact of the project on sensitive area, air quality modelling has done.
There will be emission of particulate matter, SO2 and NOx from the project.
CPCB adopted the injury symptoms and pollution dose thresholds of tolerance by sensitive species
of plants developed by W.H. Smith (1981) which stipulates that SO2 at 0.70 ppm (1820 µg/m3) after
1 hour exposure or 0.18 ppm (468 µg/m3) after 8 hours’ exposure gives rise to visible injury
symptoms in vegetation.
Similarly NOx at 20 ppm (38x103 µg/m3) after 1 hour exposure or 1.6-2.6 ppm (3000-5000 µg/m3)
after 48 hours’ exposure or 1 ppm (1900 µg/m3) after 100 hours’ exposure is likely to bring about
injury symptoms in vegetation.
However, such high ambient air concentration of SO2 and NOx is not likely to occur as a result of
this project. As per modelling studies done, the maximum resultant concentration of NOx in the
ambient air even after the project comes into operation will be 49.1 µg/m3. The concentration of SO2
was too low to be plotted.
Particulate matter emission is another matter of concern from ecological point of view. Finer
particles clog stomatal apertures and prevent gaseous exchange by leaves. Physical weight on foliage
and a film of dust causing rise in leaf surface temperature are other hazardous situations for plants.
Dust particles deposited on stigmatic surfaces of flowers reduce effective pollinations and hence fruit
yields.
 Paving has been done in all necessary areas.
 Green belt has been developed to improve the environmental quality.
 The project will maintain a zero discharge policy.

The project site will have 4149m2 i.e. 20.50% of total plot area as plantation area. In addition
2225.85 m2 (11%) of green area will be developed and maintained.
Around 2701 plants are planted within project site. The list of existing greenbelt species is given in
Table 4.9. Additional plantation will be carried out. The list of additional plants is given in Table
4.10.
Table 4-9: List of Greenbelt Species planted within the Project Site
Sl. No. Scientific Name Common Name No.

1 Terminalia Catappa Jangli badam 3
2 Mangifera indica Aam 7
3 Manilkara Zapota Chikoo 1
4 Averrhoa carambola Karmal 1
5 Psidium Guajava Amrood 2
6 Citrus Grandlis Batawi-nimbu 1
7 Citrus Lalifilia Nimbu 1
8 Borassus flabellifer Palm Tree 51
9 Baganvillia - 416
10 Ixora taiwanensis Ixora 1600
11 Crossandra infundibuliforms Crossandra 14
12 Caladium - 30
13 Russellia equisetiformis Rasili 9
14 Alpinia Zerumbet Kanghoo 42
15 Ixora taiwanensis dwerf - 32
16 Jatrofa curcas Jamal ghota 12
17 Pentas lanceolata - 40
18 Plumbago auriculata Nila chitrak 8
19 Spathiphyllum wallisii Peace lily 56
20 Plumeria pudica Bridal bouquet 6
21 Acalypha hispida Cat’s tail 4
22 Calliandra emarginata Dwarf Powder Puff 1
23 Ruellia brittoniana - 48
24 Galphimia gracillis Gold shower 5
25 Brunfelsia pauciflora Morning noon and night 4
26 Allamanda schottii Allamanda bush 16
27 Lantana Camara Raimuniya 28
28 Hymenocallis littoralis Spider lily 18
29 Heliconia psittacorum Parrots’s Flower 12
30 Alpinia purpurata Ginger 12
31 Hibiscus rosa-sinensis China Rose 18
32 Dianella tasmanica Flax lily 36
33 Codiaeum variegatum Croton 63
34 Hibiscus snowflex - 60
35 Tecoma gaudichaudi Piliya 2
36 Aglaonema commutatum Chinese Evergreen 10

Sl. No. Scientific Name Common Name No.
37 Achimenes longiflora Cupid’s Bower 20
38 Acalypha wilkesiana Copperleaf 12
Total 2701
Source: Guidelines for Greenbelt Development, CPCB, March 2000:
Table 4-10: List of plant species for additional greenbelt development

Sl. No. Scientific Name Common Name Habitat
1 Abutilon indicum Kanghi Shrub
2 Acacia leucophloea Safed babul Shrub
3 Azadirachta indica Neem Tree
4 Bambusa vulgaris Bans Penennial Grass
5 Butea monosperma Palas Tree
6 Citrus aurantium Nebu Tree
7 Dalbergia sissoo Sissoo Tree
8 Mangifera indica Aam Tree
9 Melia azedarach Mahanim Tree
10 Phoenix sylvestris Datepalm Tree
11 Poinciana pulcherrima Krishnachura Shrub
12 Saraca ashoka Ashok Tree
4.3.1.8 Socio-economic Scenario

Job opportunity: The community can look forward to benefit due to more jobs. Considering the
increasing emphasis of employment and education, the locals would have the opportunities for
administrative or other supervisory jobs, closer to their place of stay.
Expenditure incurred by those employed at the project will boost local economy.
4.3.1.9 Energy Conservation

The following energy conservation techniques has been considered for efficient energy saving in the
project:
Space Cooling: External shading prevents solar radiation from entering into the buildings and
reduces the cooling load, results to better control of overheating and indoor temperatures. Space
cooling load may be reduced by 30% due to proper shading.
Thermal insulation of buildings _external walls and roof reduces the cooling load and improves
indoor thermal comfort conditions by lowering heat gains through the building’s envelope.
Double glazing reduces the transmissivity of solar radiation, but may somewhat increase the cooling
load during periods of favourable outdoor conditions for heat dissipation. Energy consumption in
insulated buildings may be 5–30% less than in non-insulated buildings.
Light-colored roof and external walls reduce the annual cooling load, by lowering the heat absorbed
by the building’s envelope. Energy consumption in light colored buildings may be 2–4% less than in
dark colored buildings.

Solar Lights: Solar power facilities will be provided within the project site which will be 15.4 kVA
i.e.1.2% of the total connected load.

CHAPTER 5
ANALYSIS OF
ALTERNATIVES
5. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE
5.1 ALTERNATIVE PROJECT SITE
As the construction of the project has already completed, as mentioned in previous chapters, it was
not possible to analyse any alternative site for the project. The project site, however, seems to be
suitable from the following point of view:
5.2 SELECTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

technologies to conventional treatment options. It is difficult to select the most appropriate
technology from among a set of available alternatives to treat wastewater at a particular location.
Many factors, such as capital costs, operation and maintenance costs and land requirement, are
involved in the decision-making process. A comparative analysis of various available technologies
has been made and presented in Annex 5.1.

CHAPTER 6
ENVIRONMENT
MONITORING PROGRAMME
CHAPTER – 6
6. ENVIRONMENT MONITORING
PROGRAMME
6.1 THE PLAN
To ensure the effective implementation of the mitigation measures and environmental management
plan during operation phases of project, it is essential that an effective Environmental Monitoring
Plan be designed and followed during operation phase.
Suitable mitigation measures will be taken in case monitored parameters indicate non-performance
of mitigation measures. As part of post project monitoring, the Proponent shall arrange to collect and
monitor following data regularly:
 Meteorological data
 Storm water drain monitoring to ensure that pollutants from the site are not released outside.
 Stack emission from DG set.
6.2 PROPOSED MONITORING PROGRAMME

The following post-project environmental monitoring program is proposed for the Commercial
complex. Six monthly compliance reports will be prepared & submitted to the concerned authorities
as per the conditions stipulated in EC letter.
Table 6-1: Environment Monitoring Plan for Operation Phase
Monitoring & Responsible Person /
Aspect Parameter Location
Frequency Organisation
Meteorology Wind speed & At project site Continuous hourly Existing set-up will be
direction, monitoring operated by laboratory
temperature, rainfall services
and Humidity
PM10, PM2.5, SO2, Two locations Twice a month
NO2 and CO External MoEF&CC /
Ambient Air
Particulate Matter Stack monitoring NABL Accredited
Quality
and gaseous for all DG sets Continuous laboratory services
pollutants
Surface Water Physical, chemical Two locations Twice in six months External MoEF&CC /
Quality and biological NABL Accredited
parameters including laboratory services
heavy metals
Ground Water Physical, chemical Two locations Twice in six months External MoEF&CC /
Quality and biological NABL Accredited
parameters including laboratory services
heavy metals
Sewage Physical, chemical Inlet and outlet Twice in a month External MoEF&CC /
and biological locations NABL Accredited

CHAPTER – 6
Monitoring & Responsible Person /

Aspect Parameter Location
Frequency Organisation
parameters of sewage laboratory services
water in STP
Noise Level Leq both during Three stations Twice a month External MoEF&CC /
daytime and night NABL Accredited
time laboratory services
Soil Physical and Three stations Twice in six months External MoEF&CC /
chemical parameters NABL Accredited
with organic content laboratory services
Ecology Visual Impact on 10 km radius Once in a year Horticulture Specialist
flora and fauna from the project
site
6.3 COMPILATION & ANALYSIS OF DATA AND REPORTING SYSTEM
Record keeping and reporting of performance is an important management tool for ensuring
sustainable operation of the project. The monitoring shall be carried out through MoEF&CC/NABL
approved laboratory. All records shall be maintained for regulatory, monitoring and operational
issues. Typical record keeping requirements for the project is summarized in Table 6.2.
Table 6-2: Record Keeping Requirements

Parameter Particulars Responsibility
Solid Waste Handling  Daily quantity of waste collected.
& Disposal  Daily quantity treated and recycled.
 Daily quantity sent for disposal through agency.
Hazardous Wastes  Quantity of waste collected.
 Quantity of waste sent to authorize recyclers.
Sewage Treatment  Daily quantity of raw and treated sewage. The Proponent will take
 Quantity of usage of treated waste water. care & arrange to
 Treated waste water quality at inlet and outlet maintain all the records as
points per the time schedule.
Regulatory Licenses  Consents from State Pollution Control Board.
(Environmental)
Monitoring & Survey  Records of all monitoring carried out as per the
finalized monitoring protocol.
Other  Log book of maintenance and compliance.
 Equipment inspection and calibration records,
wherever applicable.
6.4 ENVIRONMENT MONITORING COST

The budget for environmental monitoring for operation phase of the project has been estimated and
presented in Table 6.3.
Table 6-3: Cost for Environmental Monitoring during Operation Phase

Total No. of Cost per Annual Capital
No. of
Component samples Frequency Sample Cost Cost
Locations
Annually (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
Air DG set stack 1 Continuous - 50,000 3,50,000

CHAPTER – 6
Total No. of Cost per Annual Capital

No. of
Component samples Frequency Sample Cost Cost
Locations
Annually (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)
2 48 Twice a month 2500 1,20,000 -
2 surface water 8 Twice in 6 months 3000 24,000 -
2 ground water 8 Twice in 6 months 3000 24,000 -
Water
2 samples of
sewage 48 Twice a month 4000 1,92,000 -
(inlet & outlet)
Noise 3 72 Twice a month 2000 1,44,000 -
Soil 3 12 Twice in 6 months 3000 36,000 -
Plantation Study Area - Once a year 1,00,000 -
Total 6,90,000 3,50,000
**The annual Environment Monitoring Cost during Operation Phase is INR 6.90 Lakhs and capital

CHAPTER 7
ADDITIONAL STUDIES
7. ADDITIONAL STUDIES
7.1 INTRODUCTION
Based on the ToR specified by the West Bengal State Expert Appraisal Committee (WB-SEAC)
issued vide Memo no. 583-2N-27/2018(E) dated 10th October 2018 for preparation of EIA/EMP
Report for the project, studies were conducted and planned to be conducted to provide a clear picture
of the project area.
7.2 RISK ASSESSMENT

These kinds of project are not a threat to the lives of people due to accidents resulting from hazards
arising out of the project. However due care shall be taken to minimize all possible causes. The
primary objective of risk assessment study is to propose a simple approach to carry out risk analysis.
Physical and Health Occupational Hazards can be broadly classified into the categories as shown in
Table 7.1.
Table 7-1: Classification of Occupational Hazards
Type of Risk Identification of Hazards
Mechanical Risks Injuries to the head, limbs, eyes etc. usually because of negligence like:
 Improper handling
 Not following prescribed safety procedures
 Neglect the use of personal protective wear
Electrical Risks Electrical hazards leading to fire and explosion mainly due to failure of circuit
breakers, insulators, fuses, bus bars and poor maintenance. Accidents may
also occur in transformer due to open arc, flash over above oil level, insulator
failure, overloading, failure of air cooling system, lighting etc. These hazards
lead to localized accidents only.
Fire/Explosion Risks Fire prone areas require adequate firefighting equipment like DG area, oil
storage area etc.
Table 7-2: Risk Identified in Particular Area
Sl. No. Area Risks Identified
1 HSD Fire, spontaneous combustion
2 Transformer & DG Sets Explosion and fire
3 Switchyard Control Room Fire in cable galleries and Switchgear/ Control Room
Table 7-3: Hazard Analysis to Whole Project in General
Sl. Preliminary Hazard
Possible Hazard Provision
No. Analysis Category
1 Environmental Factors Leakage and source of All electrical fittings and cables are
ignition as per specified standards
(transformer/DG sets) Fire protection including dry
powder, CO2 and foam extinguisher
Fire extinguisher of small size and
big size are provided at all potential
fire hazard places

7.3 DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Commercial projects encompass the lives of many people. It also involves installation of various
structures and machineries that meet the comfort and need of its population but may also pose
serious threat to the employees or occupants in case of an accident. It is thus considered necessary to
prepare a disaster management plan for the project.
Hazard analysis involves the identification and quantification of the various hazards (unsafe
conditions) that exist in the proposed project.
In the sections below, the identification of various hazards, probable risks in the project, maximum
credible accident analysis, consequence analysis are addressed which gives a broad identification of
risks involved in the project.
A detailed Table showing activity during operation phase along with mitigation measures are given
in Table 7.4.
Table 7-4: Activities with Mitigation Measures
Hazards Associated with Activities
Control / Mitigation Measures
(During Operation)
Fire  Combustible/flammable materials properly
 Flammable liquid/ gases like LPG, Diesel storage stored/used
area and combustible building materials  Good housekeeping
 Poor housekeeping  fire extinguishers made available & fire
 Grinding sparks hydrant network as per approval
 Open flames,  Emergency plan in case of fire or collapse of
 Absence of fire hydrant network structure
Absence of Personal Protective Equipment
Lack of adequate footwear, gloves, goggles, head Use of personal protective equipment and
protection, hearing/ eye protection, respiratory awareness training.
protection
 Leads maintained in good condition and
Electricity
earthed
 Electrocution
 No exposed wires
 Any leads damaged or poorly insulated
 Good insulation
 Circuits overloaded
 No overloading
 Non-use of protective devices.
 Use of protective devices
Excavations  Soil stability
 Trench collapse  No water accumulation
 Materials falling in undetected underground  Public protection
services  Emergency Plan
 Falls
Noise  Level below 85 decibels
 Noise levels exceeding the limits applicable  Proper protection
Falling Material  Materials to be secured & kept away from
 Fall during carrying/ lifting materials edge
 Dislodged tools and materials from overhead  Use of hard hats.
work areas.
Crane & Lifts  Periodic testing by competent authority
 Display of carrying capacity i.e., load (no. of  Correctly slung/ secured loads,

person), incorrectly slung,  Secured lifting of equipment
 Defective lifting equipment,  Use of proper hand signals
 Unsecured loads,
 Craning in close proximity to building people
 Falling materials.
Visitors Presence at Site  Sufficient hoarding
 Falls  Fencing and barricades
 Struck by dropped materials  Safe pedestrian access
 Road accidents  Site traffic management for loading and
 Insufficient warning signage, fencing delivery.
 Pedestrian access.
7.3.1 Emergency Response Plan
Despite all efforts, it is within the realm of possibility that emergencies and accidents could take
place. It is the objective of emergency management to prevent the accidents and to minimize losses
that occur due to such accidents by technical and organizational measures. It is also a responsibility
of effective management to be able to restore normalcy as quickly as possible. In preparation of the
Emergency Response Plan (ERP), the following elements have been considered to make it effective.
 Leadership and administration for emergency management.
 Prompt activation of Emergency Management Plan to minimize loss.
 Communication arrangements for warring/ notification and requesting external help.
 Lighting and stand-by power for various combat operations
 Setting up of an emergency control centre to act as a command and control point during an
emergency.
 Provision for medical care to the injured and response personnel
 Protection of vital records
 Preparation and use of checklists for various emergency management functions for pre, post
and in emergency activities.
 Conducting regular training programs for all level of employees.
Main hazards identified for the project include hazards pertaining to fires in buildings and fire in
diesel storage areas, earthquake and LPG leakage at residences and an ERP pertaining to these is
described in the following section:
7.3.1.1 Response in Case of Earthquake
Response Procedures for Occupants:
 If Indoors: To take cover under a piece of heavy furniture or against an inside wall and to hold
on.

 Stay inside: The most dangerous thing to do during the shaking of an earthquake is to try to
leave the building because object can fall on you.
 If Outdoors: To move into the open, away from buildings, streetlights and utility wires. Once
in the open, to stay there until the shaking stops.
 If in a moving vehicle: To stop quickly and stay in the vehicle and move to a clear area away
from buildings, trees, overpasses or utility wires. Once the shaking stops, to process with
caution. To avoid bridges or ramps that might have been damaged by the quake.
After the quake:
 After the quake, to be prepared for aftershocks.
 Although smaller than the main block, aftershocks cause additional damage and bring
weakened structures down. Aftershocks can occur in the first hours, days, weeks or even
months after the quake.
Helping Injured or Trapped Persons:
 Providing first aid where appropriate and not to move seriously injured persons unless they are
in immediate danger of further injury. To call for help.
 To help those first who may require special assistance – infants, the elderly, and people with
disabilities.
 Staying out of damaged buildings.
 Using the telephone only for emergency calls.
Response Procedures for Emergency Team:
 Formulating an Emergency Response Team for earthquake response.
 Using the public-address system, informing residents of response procedures discussed above.
 Informing the necessary authorities for aid.
 Ensuring that no person is stuck beneath any debris, in case of a structural failure.
 Ensuring that all occupants standing outside near the buildings are taken to open areas.
 Ensuring that the first aid ambulance and fire tender vehicles are summoned if necessary.
 Informing the nearby hospitals if there are any injuries.
 Checking the utilities and storage tanks for any damage.

7.3.1.2 Response in case of Fire
 Required response during in the event of a fire should be described in signs located in the
lobby.
 On sighting a fire, it should be immediately informed to the facility manager giving the exact
location and type of fire in detail.
 Initiate the Emergency Response Team for fires.
 If the fire is small, to engage in extinguishing the fire using the nearest fire extinguisher.
 Guiding the Emergency Response Team staff to the emergency assembly point.
 The Emergency Response Team should immediately inform the nearest dispensary and
security force. If required a fire tender should be summoned.
 The response team should immediately move to the point of fire and take all necessary steps to
stop the fire. If the fire is not controllable and spreads, then the manager in charge should
inform the district authorities and call for external help.
 The emergency response team will provide immediate relief to the injured residents at the
scene of incident. Any injured persons should be evacuated on priority to the dispensary or one
of the nearest hospitals based on their condition
INSTRUCTIONS FOR OCCUPANTS (Those working in office and stay in Guest House):
 Getting out of buildings as quickly and as safely as possible.
 Using the stairs to escape. When evacuating, staying low to the ground.
 If possible, covering mouth with a cloth to avoid inhaling smoke and gases.
 Closing the doors in each room after escaping to delay the spread of the fire.
 Opening a window to escape or for fresh air while awaiting rescue.
 Staying out of damaged buildings.
 Adequate fire-fighting system is proposed for the project as per norms to prevent and control
fire outbreaks. The fire-fighting system will consist of portable fire extinguishers, hose reel wet
riser, yard hydrant, automatic sprinkler system and manual fire alarm system.
7.3.1.3 LPG/Natural Gas Leakage (from Guest House Kitchen)
 The affected area should be evacuated and cordoned off immediately.
 Intimating the Emergency Response Team about LPG/Natural Gas leakage.
 Shutting down the main valves in the gas pipeline.

 Ensuring that only concerned personnel are present in the affected area and all other people
moved to the nearest assembly points.
 Rescuing trapped personnel. Also, checking if any personnel are unconscious in the area and
immediately moving them outside and providing first aid.
 Ambulance should be summoned to take injured personnel to the nearest hospital.
 Source of leakage should be traced and isolated from all other areas. If required, pedestal fans
shall be used to bring down the gas concentration.
 No match box or gas lighter or electric device or switch should be operated.
7.3.2 Procedure for Treatment

On getting a signal of an emergency, the site incident controller officer will take control of situation.
First aid parties will render first aid to casualties at the place of occurrence and those requiring
further treatment would be transported to the nearest hospital by ambulance. The following numbers
will be prominently displayed in each block:
 Fire Officer
 Police Station
 Nearest Hospital
 District Administration
First Aid
It is necessary to give first aid to the persons injured in the disaster. Doctor and paramedical staff
will be made ready during emergency. There will be adequate first aid facility available to meet the
workload.
Repair Services
Repair of damaged parts of the buildings will be taken up. Essential public utility services viz. water,
electricity and sewerage system will be maintained in the case of a disaster.
Fire Fighting Services

Adequate fire-fighting arrangements will be provided in the proposed Residential Complex. The fire-
fighting arrangements to be provided in the complex are mentioned below:
 Provision of water sprinklers

 Provision of separate fire hydrant pipe
 Provision of yard hydrant consisting of 63 mm diameter single headed hydrant valve with 2
nos. 15 m long 63 mm diameter fire hose pipe and 1 branch pipe with nozzle

 Provision of underground water storage tank
 Provision of 4 way fire brigade inlet connection
 There is provision of fire-fighting pumps
The details of fire-fighting equipments are listed in Table 7.5.
Table 7-5: Fire-fighting Equipment Details
Sl. No. Item Description Quantity Unit
Single headed hydrant landing valve Ø63 mm
1 42 Nos.
(32+10)
2 Fire hose cabinet 42 Nos.
3 RRL Fire Hose Pipe Ø63mm x 16 m 84 Nos.
4 Short branch pipe nozzle Ø20mm 32 Nos.
5 Electric driven main fire pump set 2850 LPM @70 m head 03 Nos.
6 Electric driven fire jockey pump set 180 LPM @63 m head 01 Nos.
7 C.I butterfly valve 150 mm dia 09 Nos.
10 Portable CO2 type fire extinguisher capacity 4.5 kg, 22 Nos.
11 Portable ABC type fire extinguisher 36 Nos.
12 Portable Dry chemical type fire extinguisher 22 Nos.
13 Portable Foam fire extinguisher 02 Nos.
14 RCC underground fire water tank capacity 3,00,000 litres 01 Nos.
15 RCC overhead fire water tank capacity 20,000 litres 02 Nos.
16 Common electric main fire pump control panel 01 Nos.
17 4-way fire bridging inlet connection 02 Nos.
18 M.S. class “B” pipe sizes 25-150 mm Nos.

CHAPTER 8
PROJECT BENEFITS
CHAPTER – 8
8. PROJECT BENEFITS
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Corporation Limited (DEC) and provides sales and support services of power equipment. Dongfang
Electric (India) Private Limited has developed a commercial office Building cum Guest House at
New town, Rajarhat, Kolkata which comprises of Block A & B. The project is developed on a total
land area 2.0235 ha and have a total built-up area of 22,100.2 m2.
8.2 PROJECT BENEFITS

8.3 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIBILITY

As per MoEF&CC’s OM dated 1st May, 2018, maximum 1.5% of the project cost should be spent on
CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) activities for green-field projects having project cost
>100 crores. As such for the project, an amount of maximum Rs. 1.74 Crores has to be earmarked for
spending under CER activities.
The primary beneficiaries of CER shall be people living within the radius of 10 km of the project.
The company has allocated a budget for carrying out socio-economic welfare activities as mentioned
above. The amount earmarked in the budget will be separately kept and will not be used for any
other purposes. The budget may be adjusted as per the actual requirement during the implementation
stage. The proposed budget for CER activities is given in Table 8.1.

ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT PROJECT BENEFITS
Table 8-1: Budget Allocation for CER Activities
Rs. 116.01
Dongfang Electric (India) Private Limited
Crores
Rs. 1.74
Corporate Environment Responsibility in INR Crore @ 1.5% of the project cost
Crores
Year wise implementation and Budgetary provision during Total
Sl.
operation phase budgetary
No Activity
provision
. 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year
(Rs.)
Social Facilities
Construction of 2 nos. stainless steel bus stop, where ever required within
1 2,80,000 2,80,000 2,80,000 2,80,000 2,80,000 14,00,000
5km of Project site
2 Installation of Solar LED based Street Lights 4,00,000 4,00,000 4,00,000 4,00,000 4,00,000 20,00,000
3 Development and beautification of nearby parks with 2 km of project site 5,00,000 5,00,000 5,00,000 5,00,000 5,00,000 25,00,000
Health Related Facilities
Periodic medical check-up camp by appointing specialist doctor for eyes,
4 8,00,000 8,00,000 8,00,000 8,00,000 8,00,000 40,00,000
skin, heart and dental quarterly
5 Installation of Sanitary Vending Machine in nearby schools 5,50,000 5,50,000 5,50,000 5,50,000 5,50,000 27,50,000
Education Related Facilities
6 Scholarship to deserving Students in School 2,00,000 2,00,000 2,00,000 2,00,000 2,00,000 10,00,000
Providing financial assistance to schools for construction/renovation/repair of
7 2,50,000 2,10,000 2,10,000 2,10,000 2,10,000 12,50,000
hostels, school buildings, and classrooms.
8 Water purifier and cooling machines in schools & hospitals 5,00,000 5,00,000 5,00,000 5,00,000 5,00,000 25,00,000
Total 34,80,000 34,80,000 34,80,000 34,80,000 34,80,000 1,74,00,000

CHAPTER 9
ENVIRONMENT COST
BENEFIT ANALYSIS
9. ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT

ANALYSIS
The Environmental cost benefit analysis is not recommended by West Bengal SEAC/SEIAA at
scoping Stage.

CHAPTER 10
ENVIRONMENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
10. ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT

PLAN
10.1 INTRODUCTION
The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is a site specific plan developed to ensure that the
project is implemented in an environmental sustainable manner where all contractors and
subcontractors, including consultants, understand the potential environmental risks arising from the
project and take appropriate actions to properly manage that risk.
The most reliable way to ensure that these plans are integrated into the overall project planning and
implementation is to include them as an integral component of the project. This ensures that it will
receive funding and supervision along with other investment components. For optimal integration of
EMP into the project, there should be links for: (a) Funding, (b) Management and (c) Monitoring
10.2 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT CELL (EMC)

A separate environment management cell comprising of a team of experienced and qualified
personnel reporting to a very senior level executive preferably an environmental engineer will be
appointed by the proponent and an Environment Management Cell will be formed in the complex.
The Environment Management Cell will be responsible for managing following activities related to
environment function of project during operation phase:
 Co-ordinate and manage the EMP implementation during operation phase.
 Appoint dedicated environment staff to manage environmental monitoring responsibilities.
 Manage and co-ordinate environmental monitoring and control.
 Co-ordination with other sections and government agencies in relation to environmental
management activities.
 Safety specialist will ensure safe working practices in all the sections of the project.
Environmental Management cell will implement and review the compliance of the stipulated
conditions specified in Environmental Clearance and Consent for Operation The cell will be
responsible to obtain Consent to Operate under Water Act and Air Act from West Bengal Pollution
Control Board. The Organogram for Environmental Management Cell is given Figure 10.1.

Figure 10.1: Organogram for Environmental Management Cell

10.3 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
The environment management plan for operation phase is given in Table 10.1.
Table 10-1: Environmental Management Plan for Operation Phase

Responsibility
Sl. Environmental
Management Measures Execution/Civil Supervision/
No. Aspects/Issues
Work Monitoring
a. Air pollution  Stack heights of DG sets is as per Contractor EMC
the CPCB guidelines.
 Proper traffic management will be
prepared to ensure that there is no
traffic congestion at the project site.
It will help in reduction of vehicular
emissions.
 Vehicles will have a “Pollution
Under Control” certificate.
 Greenery and landscaping will be
further develop which will be
helpful in improving ambient air
quality.
 Monitoring of ambient air quality/
source emission will be carried out
as per monitoring plan.
b Water pollution  During operation phase, continuous Contractor EMC
efforts will be made to reduce water
consumption.
 Efforts will be made to stop wastage
and leakage of water.
 Provision will be made for rain
water harvesting for ground water
recharge.
 Collection of waste water and

Responsibility
Sl. Environmental
Management Measures Execution/Civil Supervision/
No. Aspects/Issues
Work Monitoring
treatment of waste water in Sewage
Treatment Plant (STP) will be
considered for reusing of waste
water.
 Regular testing and analysis of
treated waste from STP to ensure
effectiveness of operation of STP.
c Solid Waste  The wastes shall be collected, Contractor EMC
segregated and disposed as per
Municipal Waste Management
Rules, 2016.
 Municipal waste collection bins will
be placed at strategic locations.
 Used lubricating waste oil and oil
contaminated cloths etc. will be
collected separately in containers
and shall be sold to authorized
recyclers as per SPCB guidelines.
d Noise Pollution  DG sets are provided with acoustic Contractor EMC
enclosure as per CPCB guidelines.
 Greenbelt and landscaping will be
further developed as barrier for
noise pollution. Monitoring of
ambient noise will be carried out as
per monitoring plan.
e Ecology  Indigenous species shall be planted Contractor EMC
in consultation with horticulturist
and species will be selected based
on the criteria prescribed by the
CPCB
f Traffic  All vehicles will be parked in Contractor EMC
Management designated parking area only.
Warning signages are retro
reflective type and clearly visible in
the night.
 Personnel will be deployed to guide
the vehicles in order to avoid traffic
jam.
*The budget for carrying out the environment management plan for the project is given in Chapter 12.

CHAPTER 11
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION
11. SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

11.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
Dongfang Electric (India) Private Limited has developed a commercial office Building cum Guest House at
Plot no. AH-5, Premises No. Mar:-16-1111, New town, Rajarhat, Kolkata over an area of 2.0235 ha.
No. 583-2N-27/2018(E) dated 10th October, 2018.
SIA/WB/NCP/22937/2018.
11.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENT

Water: The total water requirement during operation phase will be 79 KLD of which 50 KLD will
be fresh water requirement while 29 KLD of treated water shall be required for flushing, landscaping
and miscellaneous use.

Wastewater generation: The total estimated wastewater generation from the project site during
operation phase is 33 KLD.
Sewage Treatment Plant: The wastewater from the project operation shall be treated in a sewage
treatment plant of 40 KL capacity based on MBBR technology.
Power Supply & Back-up: During operation phase the estimated electrical load is 1447 kVA. The
supply will be by New Town Kolkata Electric Supply Company Limited (NTESCL). Power back-up
will be provided by the 2 no. of DG set of capacity 650 kVA each.
Solid waste generation: Estimated quantity of the waste during operation phase is 105 kg per day.
Handling) Rules, 2016 amended to date. Also, the local vendors will be hired to provide separate
areas.
Occupancy: During operation phase, approximately 474 occupants will occupy the building which
includes 292 Employees, 44 visitors, 94 guests and 44 service staff approximately.
11.3 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT STATUS

Topography
The elevation of the site varies from 0 m to 2 m above Mean Sea Level. The general slope of the site
is from West to East.
Seismology
The project site falls under seismic zone III which is a moderate damage risk zone.
Soil
 The soil is slightly alkaline, with pH ranging from 7.1 to 7.3 in the study area. The texture of
the soil is dominantly clayey loam in nature.
 The moisture content of the soil samples is found to be low and ranges from 3.35% to 4.81%.
This is due to low water holding capacity of the soil.
 Organic carbon, a major nutrient for soil fertility, was present in more than sufficient content in
the sampling locations.
 The NPK content was found to be good for growth of plants
Air Environment
The air quality monitoring has been conducted for 7 sites in and around the project site.

μg/m3). PM2.5 ranges between 55.3 μg/m3 in AAQ2 to 71.7 μg/m3 in AAQ5. The values recorded
were within the stipulated standard.
Sulphur Dioxide (SOx) & Nitrogen Dioxide (NOx):. The SOx concentration ranges from 12.8 μg/m3
in AAQ2 to 16.8 μg/m3 at AAQ5. The anthropogenic sources for SO2 emissions are high vehicular
movement.
μg/m3) and lowest at AAQ2 (27.7 μg/m3). The values, however, are well within the NAAQ standard.
Noise Level
The noise quality has been monitored for 7 sites in and around the project site. The major source of
the noise level fluctuation in daytime and night time was observed majorly due to the vehicular
movement. The maximum noise level in daytime observed was 62.6 dB(A) near project site and
minimum noise level observed was 53.9 dB(A) at Krishna nagar. The maximum noise level in night
time observed was 51.5 dB(A) near Project Site while minimum noise level was 42.7 dB(A) at
Krishna Nagar.
Surface and Ground Water

The surface water samples were collected from three locations. Summary of the water quality is
given below.
 The analysis results indicate that the pH values of all the samples are in the range of 7.3 to 7.7.
 TDS was observed in the range of 300 mg/l at SW3 (Waterbody at BB Block) to 600 mg/l at
 The chloride and sulphate were found to be in the range of 68.5 mg/l at SW3 (Waterbody at
BB Block) to 138.5 mg/l SW2 (Keshtopur Khal near Loha pool) and 25.3 mg/l at SW3
(Waterbody at BB Block)) to 74.1 mg/l SW2 (Keshtopur Khal near Loha pool) respectively.
 In the study area BOD concentration varies between 4.6 mg/l at SW3 to 17.6 mg/l at SW2.
BOD tests measures only biodegradable fraction of the total potential DO consumption of a
water sample.
Ground water is collected from 3 locations. The analysis result is given below:

 The analysis results indicate that the pH of the samples ranges in between 7.5 to 7.9 in the
collected water samples which do not exceed the recommended limit (6.5 - 8.5) of BIS.
 The maximum total hardness in groundwater found to be 265.9 mg/l in sample at GW3
(Mohishgot) and the minimum was observed as 212.2 mg/l in the sample at GW1 (Project
Site).The hardness was found to be within the permissible limit of 600 mg/l as per IS
10500:2012.
 The chloride concentration recorded from the ground water samples ranged from 53.7 mg/l
(Project site) to 81.0 mg/l (Mohishgot). All the samples are within the Acceptable Limit of 250
mg/l prescribed by BIS for drinking water.
 Sulphate concentration was found in the range of 22 mg/l (Project site) to 39 mg/l (Mohishgot).
The BIS acceptable limit for sulphate in drinking water is 200 mg/l.
Environment Sensitivity
radius of the project site. East Calcutta Wetlands is located at a distance of 1.5km in SSW direction.
The nearest water body is the Bagiola Khal at a distance of 0.5 km and Hoogly River is situated at
the distance of 9.4km in NW direction.
11.4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION

MEASURES
The environmental impacts were identified and the potential impacts on different environmental
components due operation of the project were predicted.
Impacts & Mitigation Measures during Operation phase:

Air Quality: During the operation phase of the project, the major impact will be from DG set. The
air pollutants of concern from the DG Sets emissions are Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), un-burnt Carbon
(CO) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NO2) as per CPCB guidelines.
Land-Use: The land parcel where the project is developed is allotted for commercial development
by West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited. Land-use of the project

site is as per the master plan. Moreover, the site had no trees which required tree felling. The site was
a vacant land and did not require shifting of any utilities or infrastructure.
Water Quality: During operation phase, the fresh water required shall be supplied by New Town
using MBBR technology.
 Rainwater harvesting shall be carried out in pit size of 350m3 to reuse or recharge ground
water.
Noise Quality: The major sources of noise during the operational phase are:
pollution.

Solid Waste: The total solid waste generation during operation phase will be 105 kg per day. The
solid waste will comprise of biodegradable waste e.g. domestic waste, food waste, horticultural
waste etc. and recyclable waste, like plastic, paper, tin, glass etc.
Ecological Management: There is no National Parks or Wildlife Sanctuaries within the study area.
The project site have 4149m2 i.e. 20.50% of total plot area as plantation area. In addition 2225.85 m2
(11%) of green area will be developed and maintained.
Around 2701 plants are already planted within project site and additional plantation will be carried
out to increase the greenbelt coverage within the project site.
11.5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

Selection of Alternative Project Site
As the construction of the project has already completed, it was not possible to analyse any
alternative site for the project. The project site, however, seems to be suitable from the following
point of view:
Selection of Sewage Treatment Technology
technologies to conventional treatment options. Many factors, such as capital costs, operation and
maintenance costs and land requirement, are involved in the decision-making process. After detailed
evaluation, MBBR technology has been selected for proposed STP plant. The technology offers
various advantages, which are mentioned below:
 It provides primary, secondary and tertiary treatment all in one unit; in a single evergreen
facility open to atmosphere;

 It is very simple to operate, maintain;
 It does not require skilled man-power;

 It is cost competitive particularly with reference to O&M cost;
 No pre-treatment and no chemical usage;

 Absence of any moving part;
 Odour-free; and
 Low energy requirement etc.
11.6 ENVIRONMENT MONITORING PLAN

The purpose of the monitoring programme is to ensure that the intended environmental measures are
achieved. To ensure proper implementation of the Environment Management Plan (EMP), it is
essential that an effective monitoring programme is designed and carried out during operation. The
broad objectives of the environment monitoring programme are
 To monitor impacts on the surrounding environment and the effectiveness of mitigation measures
during the operation.
 To ensure that the environmental control systems are operating satisfactorily.
 To suggest ongoing improvements in management plan, if required, for subsequent effective

monitoring.
The annual Environment Monitoring Cost during Operation Phase is INR 6.90 Lakhs and capital
11.7 RISK ASSESSMENT & DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Building & Construction projects normally do not pose a threat to people’s lives. However due care
shall be taken to minimize all possible causes. Risk may arise from HSD, transformer & DG sets and
switchyard control room resulting in mainly fire and explosion.
The disaster management plan was prepared following all safety norms. Adequate fire control
system, personal protective equipments, an emergency response plan to address natural as well as
man-made disaster has been put in place to take care of the same.
11.8 PROJECT BENEFITS


The project will also lead to improvement of physical and social infrastructures in the surrounding.
Through its corporate environment responsibility, the proponent shall spend an amount of Rs. 1.74
crores for upliftment of nearby community.
11.9 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) consists of description of the administrative aspects of
ensuring that mitigative measures are implemented and their effectiveness monitored, after approval
of the EIA.
11.10 ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL DAMAGE, REMEDIATION PLAN

AND NATURAL AND COMMUNITY AUGMENTATION PLAN
For assessment of ecological damage, Google Earth’s historic images were referred to and it was
established that project area was devoid of any trees or vegetation cover before starting the
construction works.
The damaging activity for each environment parameter was assessed and remediation plan was
worked out as per which, the cost for remediation stands at Rs. 31.82 lakhs. The cost for natural
resource augmentation plan and Community resource augmentation has been worked out to be Rs.
4.25 lakhs and Rs. 11.25 lakhs respectively.

CHAPTER 12
DISCLOSURE OF THE
CONSULTANT
12. DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT

12.1 INTRODUCTION
Greencindia Consulting Private Limited (GCPL) is an environmental consultancy organization,
manned by a highly qualified, experienced and multidisciplinary team of scientists and engineers.
The company has received accreditation from Quality Council of India (NABET-QCI) as an EIA
Consultancy organization.
The primary aim of GCPL is to sensitize policy planner and local people about their development
needs through capacity building process. The company facilitates managerial and technical expertise
to people and associations for development of areas and regions.
GCPL has undertaken more than 100 EIA and other associated studies and clearances for mining
projects, thermal power projects; airports, road and highways; special economic zones (SEZs); urban
infrastructure projects, etc. The main objects of the Company are as follows:
 To carry on the business of providing all types of consultancy services related to Social And
Environmental Impact Assessment, Environment Action Plan, Tribal Development Plan,
Resettlement and Rehabilitation Action Plan, Project Information Report, Detailed Project Report,
Need Assessment Report, Corporate Social Responsibility Plan, Forest Diversion Plan, Wildlife
Conservation Plan, Drainage Plan and Hydrogeology Environment, Social & Land related legal
services and any other consultancy services and studies related to urban development, rural
development, environment, forest and legal aspects.
 To provide consultancy services in environment monitoring, sample collection of air, water, soil,
meteorological data and publish testing results for the collected samples
 To undertake research study in the field of environment, social, legal, agriculture, urban planning,
rural planning, alternate sources of energy etc and provide consultancy/advisory/training services
in these field to government, quasi-government, non-government and private institutions.
 EPFI reporting, environmental and social impact assessment according to IFC guidelines and
equator principles.
12.2 AREA OF EXPERTISE

 Environmental Impact Assessment
 Environmental Management Plan
 Disaster Management Plan
 Risk Assessment
 Rehabilitation & Resettlement Plan

 Pre-feasibility Report
 Detailed Project Report
 Geo-Technical Investigation
 National, Regional and Urban Plans
 Management Information System and Geographic Information system
 Urban Infrastructure Development including Water Supply and Solid Waste Management
 Environmental Monitoring and Assessments
 Impact Assessment Formulate Policies & Mitigation Measures R&R
 Natural Resource Management
 Terminal Planning and Design
 Institutional Strengthening
 Development, Functional and Strategic Planning and Design
 Preparation of Manuals
 Training Programmes
12.3 ACHIEVEMENT OF THE COMPANY

Greencindia Consulting Private Limited (GCPL) (formerly GIS Enabled Environment & Neo-
graphic Center) is an ISO 9001:2008-QMS, 14001:2004-EM and 18001:2004-OHSAS certified
company. The company is accredited with QCI-NABET since 2010. We have completed One RA &
Two SA. We are accredited for following sectors: -
 Mining of minerals-Open Cast & Underground Mining
 River Valley Projects
 Thermal Power Project
 Coal Washeries
 Metallurgical Industries-Ferrous and Non-Ferrous
 Cement Plants
 Oil & gas transportation pipeline (crude & refinery/petrochemical products) passing through
national parks/sanctuaries/coral reefs/ecologically sensitive areas including LNG terminal
 Airports
 Industrial Estate/Parks/Complexes/Areas, export processing zones (EPZs), Special Economic
Zones (ESZs), Biotech Parks, Leather Complexes

 Highways
 Common Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility
 Buildings and Large construction projects
 Townships & Area development projects
12.4 BRIEF RESUME OF TEAM MEMBERS

GCPL comprises of group of professionals drawn from development related fields. The core
members of GCPL team hold experiences in Developmental Planning, Pollution Control, Economic
Analysis, Social Work and Information Technologies. In addition there is a panel of senior associates
and young voluntaries facilitating the various programmes. The brief resume of the Environment Co-
ordinator and Functional Area experts (Core Functional Areas & Significant Functional Area) are
discussed below:
Sl. Name of Years of Area of Involvement
No. Expert Experience Specialization (Period & Task)
1 Rahul Singh 17 EC-Building & AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019
Construction  Selecting the team to be involved in
the EIA report.
 Compiling Form-1 of the notification,
2006 based on personal understanding
and from inputs from the Project
Report, site and client.
 Visiting the site for appropriate
duration for the selection of sampling
locations and deciding the type of
samples in consultation with the
respective FAEs.
 Reviewing the report write-up
 Developing the EIA report and
circulating the same amongst the
respective team members for final
feedback and ensuring coverage of the
respective functional areas in the EIA.
Land-use AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019
 Development of Land-use Map
 Impact of project on surrounding Land
use
 Assistance during development of
project management plan
Socio-economic- AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019
SE  Assessment of social impact associated
with project


community augmentation plan
2 K.D. 45 Noise AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019
Choudhury  Identifying the sources of noise during
project operation
3 Swagata 5.0 Water Pollution- AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019
Mukherjee WP  Selecting monitoring location for
ground water and surface water
 Assessment of impact associated with
the project operation activities
 Development of water conservation
plan and assistance in development of
remediation plan.
4 Dipannita 6.0 Ecology & AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019
Das Biodiversity-EB  Survey of existing flora & fauna in the
study area
 Assessment of impact associated with
project
 Selection of species for greenery
development
natural resource augmentation plan
5 Dr. P.C 8 Soil AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019
Kuniyal Conservation  Selection of soil sampling locations
(SC)  Assistance during development of
6 Dr. Manoj 15 Hydrogeology AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019
Kumar (HG)  Water table of the area in pre-monsoon
and post monsoon season
 Development of management plan
7 Vikas 15 Air Pollution AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019
Chandra Monitoring  Assessment of impact associated with
Sharma Prevention the project operation Activities
Control-AP  Assessment of impact associated with
vehicle movement operation
 Development of Management Plan to
control the air pollution & its
mitigation
Municipal Solid AUGUST 2017 – JANUARY 2019


Waste (MSW)  Quantitative Assessment of municipal
solid waste likely to be generated from
the project
 Development of waste management
plan depending on the type of MSW
12.5 QCI ACCREDITATION CERTIFICATE
GCPL is accredited under QCI-NABET scheme for accreditation of EIA consultant’s organizations
vide certificate number: NABET/EIA/1619/RA0058 on June, 28 2017 for 13 sectors (refer Annex
12.1 for QCI Certificate).
12.6 CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION FOR LABORATORY

Greencindia Consulting Private Limited has signed MoU with Envirotech East Private Limited
(EEPL) for conducting the analytical tests for this project. The MoU between GCPL and EEPL is
attached as Annex 12.2. EEPL has been accredited by NABET and the relevant document is
attached as Annex 12.3.

CHAPTER 13
ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL
DAMAGE, REMEDIATION PLAN
& NATURAL & COMMUNITY
RESOURCE AUGMENTATION
PLAN
13. ASSESSMENT ECOLOGICAL OF

DAMAGE, REMEDIATION PLAN &
NATURAL & COMMUNITY RESOURCE
AUGMENTATION PLAN
13.1 INTRODUCTION
In order to carry out the environmental/ ecological damage assessment and formulation of related
remediation plan and the natural and community resource augmentation plan with respect to
construction activity, which has already been carried out, the extent of environmental damage caused
by the project without formal statutory approval has been assessed.
In this chapter, the impact due to unscientific measures and the absence of EMP undertaken if any
will be elaborated. The measurable impacts will be ascertained with the extent of damage done with
the financial liabilities to bridge the gap of stipulated environmental norms.
13.2 DAMAGE ASSESSMENT

For the present study, Google Earth Historic Images of the project area in different phases viz. before
starting construction, during construction and after construction have been analysed. From this
analysis, it is clear that the project area was devoid of any trees or vegetation cover before starting
the construction works.
18/11/2011 21/02/2013

15/03/2016 Current Scenario - 05/08/2018

Figure 13.1: Project Scenario
13.3 NATURAL RESOURCE AUGMENTATION PLAN
Natural resource augmentation plan refers to supplement the natural resources that were consumed
for the purpose of the project. For this purpose, the project has planned to make provisions for the
following:
 Rainwater harvesting for ground water recharge
 Development of additional greenbelt in the project premises
 Installation of solar lights in common areas and solar heating system
13.4 COMMUNITY AUGMENTATION PLAN

The land for the commercial development was allotted by West Bengal Housing Infrastructure
Development Corporation Limited. No community was residing previously in the current land
location hence resettlement and rehabilitation issue is ruled out here. Prima facie the development of
the project will have positive impact on the surroundings.
The development happened was as per the Master Plan except Prior Environment Clearance.
The project will help the local poor people/areas in uplifting the quality of life through the following
major activities:
• Donation of E-rickshaw to poor’s for their livelihood
• Installation of Retro-reflective road signage’s
• Saplings distributions in school and colleges
• Distribution of study materials, uniform, books to the poor students of nearby schools.

13.5 REMEDIATION PLAN
The construction work of the project was completed on 4th July 2016. Therefore, the following table
lists out the damaging activity for each environmental parameter along with the remediation plan and
budgetary estimate for the operation phase of the project.
Total Project Cost is 116.01 Crores
Table 13-1: Cost for Remediation Plan

Total Amount of Remediation Plan Fund Allocation for greening Amount of other fund allocated
(Rs.) in lakhs (2.0% of the Project activity (WBFDCL/WBWDCL/SFDA) (Rs.) in lakhs
Cost) Rs. In
232.02 23.202 208.818
Sl. No. Items of work to be executed Total fund allotment (Rs.) in lakhs
1. Tractor Attached Road Sweeping Machine
Truck Mounted Road Sweeping Machine
Portable/Movable Toilet
Vehicular Pollution Testing Machine
Model Waste Bin (With Segregation) 208.818
Plastic Recyclable Counter
E-Rickshaw
Installation of Bio Gas Plant
Purchase/hiring of Electric Buses
2. For Greening activity 23.202
Grand Total 232.02

ANNEXURES
ANNEX 1.1
TOR LETTER
ANNEX 1.2
TOR COMPLIANCE
ANNEX 1.2: ToR COMPLIANCE
Compliance
Reference
Sl. No. TOR Point
Remarks Section/ Table/
Chapter No.
Annex
Standard ToR for Building Construction projects by MoEFCC
1. Examine details of land use as Land-use of the study area Chapter 3 Section 3.6.1,
per Master Plan and land use (10 km) has been analysed Table 3.4
around 10 km radius of the based on latest satellite
project site. imagery and as per the
Analysis should be made based analysis made, built-up area
on latest satellite imagery for constitutes about 43.7% of
land use with raw images. the study area followed by
Waterbodies of about 19%.
The rest is primarily
agricultural land and open
scub land constituting 16.1%
and 8.9% respectively.
Marshy land, waste land,
wooded area, Open land,
airport area, industries, brick
kiln cover 3.3%, 3.0%, 3.3%,
1.1%, 1.1%, 0.3%, 0.2%
respectively of the study
area.
2. Submit details of
There are presence of Chapter 3 Section 3.4
environmentally sensitive
Protected Forests, Reserve
places, land acquisition status,
Forest and a Wildlife
rehabilitation of communities/ Sanctuary within 15 km
villages and present status of radius of the project site.
such activities. East Calcutta Wetland lies at
a distance of 1.5km in SSW
direction from Project Site.
The land for project
development was allotted by
West Bengal Housing
Infrastructure Development
Corporation Limited.
No rehabilitation was done
for the project.
3. Examine baseline environmental The baseline data has been Chapter 3 Section 3.3 to
quality along with projected collected during summer 3.15
incremental load due to the season (March to May) 2018.
project. For primary data collection
& methodology adopted for
baseline data collection,
please refer section 3.3.1 and
Table no. 3.1 of Chapter 3 of
Compliance
Reference
Sl. No. TOR Point
Chapter No.
Annex
EIA/EMP Report.
For baseline data, please
refer section 3.3 to 3.15 of
EIA/EMP Report.
For impact, please refer Chapter 4 Section 4.3
section 4.3 of Chapter 4 of
EIA/EMP Report.
4. Environmental data to be Baseline data has been Chapter 3 Section 3.8,
considered in relation to the collected during Mar to May 3.10, 3.12, 3.15,
project development would be 2018 for land, water, air, bio- 3.13, 3.16.
(a) Land, diversity, Noise level &
(b) Ground water, Socio-economic data.
(c) Surface Water,
(d) Air,
(e) Bio-Diversity,
(f) Noise And Vibrations,
(g) Socio Economic and Health.
5. Submit a copy of the contour Contour map and slope map Chapter 3 Section 3.10.1
plan with slopes, drainage are provided in Figure 3.3 &
pattern of the site and 3.4 respectively.
surrounding area. There are no drainage
channels at the site. The
drainage pattern has been
described in Chapter 3 and
shown in Figure 3.10.
6. Submit the details of the trees to No trees have been felled for - -
be felled for the project. the project
7. Submit the present land use and The project area of 2.0235 ha - -
permission required for any is under possession of the
conversion such as forest, Proponent. The land for
agriculture etc. project development was
allotted by West Bengal
Housing Infrastructure
Development Corporation
Limited.
8. Submit Roles and responsibility A separate environment Chapter 10 Section 10.2
of the developer etc. for management cell comprising
compliance of environmental of a team of experienced and
regulations under the provisions qualified personnel reporting
of EP Act. to a very senior level
executive will be appointed
by the proponent to take care
of the compliance to
provisions of EPA.
9. Ground water classification as As per CGWB, 2012, the Chapter 3 Section 3.7
per the Central Ground Water depth to water level at the
Authority. project site varies from 2.0-
13.60 m bgl during pre-
Compliance
Reference
Sl. No. TOR Point
Chapter No.
Annex
monsoon season while it is
1.64 to 10.66 m bgl during
post-monsoon season.
10. Examine the details of Source of The requirement of water Chapter 2 Section 2.4.4
water, water requirement, use of during operation phase is 79
treated waste water and prepare KLD out of which 50 KLD is
a water balance chart. fresh water requirement and
29 KLD will be treated water
requirement. The water will
be supplied by New Town
Kolkata Development
Authority.
The treated waste water
would be recycled and reused
for non-potable purpose.
The water balance diagram is
shown in Figure 2.1.
11. Rain water harvesting proposals The project site have Chapter 4 Section 4.3.1.5
should be made with due developed Rainwater
safeguards for ground water harvesting pit of size 350 m3,
quality. which will collect 3 days of
Maximize recycling of water peak rainfall. Approximately
and utilization of rain water. 129.88m3 per day of water
Examine details. will be stored during peak
rainy month.
12. Examine soil characteristics and Soil characteristics has been Chapter 3 Section 3.9
depth of ground water table for analysed, the results of which
rainwater harvesting. are given in Chapter 3.
13. Examine details of solid waste Solid waste generation Chapter 2 Section 2.5
generation treatment and its details have been given in
disposal. Chapter 2 and the disposal Chapter 4 Section 4.3.1.4
mechanism has been
described in Chapter 4
14. Examine and submit details of Solar power facilities will be Chapter 2 Section 2.4.3
use of solar energy and provided within the project
alternative source of energy to site which will be 15.4 kVA
reduce the fossil energy i.e.1.2% of the total
consumption. connected load.
15. DG sets are likely to be used While calculating impact on Chapter 4 Section 4.3.1.2
during construction and air environment, emission
operational phase of the project. from DG set has been
Emissions from DG sets must be considered.
taken into consideration while
estimating the impacts on air
environment. Examine and
submit details.
16. Examine road/rail connectivity The connectivity to the Chapter 2 Section 2.3
to the project site and impact on project site has been
Compliance
Reference
Sl. No. TOR Point
Chapter No.
Annex
the traffic due to the proposed described in Chapter 2
project. Present and future
traffic and transport facilities for
the region should be analyzed
with measures for preventing
traffic congestion and providing
faster trouble free system to
reach different destinations in
the city.
17. A detailed traffic andThe traffic survey has been Chapter 3 Section 3.14
transportation study should be carried out at two roads from
made for existing and projected where it is expected that the
passenger and cargo traffic. traffic flow from the project
will disperse.
The impact on traffic due to Chapter 4 Section 4.3.1.6
the project is given in
Chapter 4
18. Examine the details of transport The construction of project is - -
of materials for construction already completed.
which should include source and
availability.
19. Examine separately the details The details of Environmental Chapter 6 & 10 Section 6.2 &
for construction and operation Management Plan and 6.4
phases both for Environmental Environmental Monitoring Section 10.3
Management Plan and Plan both for construction
Environmental Monitoring Plan and operation phases with
with cost and parameters. cost and parameters have
been described in Chapter 6
and Chapter 10 of EIA/EMP
Report.
20. Submit details of a The probable risk associated Chapter 7 -
comprehensive Disaster with the project is detailed
Management Plan including out in Chapter 7 and the
emergency evacuation during relevant disaster management
natural and man-made disaster. plan is also discussed.
21. Details of litigation pending No litigations are pending - -
against the project, if any, with against the project.
direction /orders passed by any
court of law against the project
should be given
22. The Cost of the Project (capital The total cost of the project - -
cost and recurring cost) as well is 116.01 crores.
as cost towards implementation The budget for EMP is given
of EMP should be clearly spelt in Chapter 13
out
23. Any further clarification on - -
carrying out the above studies
including anticipated impacts
Compliance
Reference
Sl. No. TOR Point
Chapter No.
Annex
due to the project and mitigative
measure, project proponent can
refer to the model ToR available
on Ministry website
http://moef.nic.in/Manual/Town
ships”.
24.
Specific ToR for Dong Fang Electric (India) Private Limited.
1. Project description, its The project description is Chapter 2 & 8 -
importance and the benefits, given in Chapter 2. The
importance and benefits of
the project is given in
Chapter 8
2. Project site details (location, The project location is shown Chapter 1and 3 Section 1.3 &
topo sheet of the study area of in Figure 1.2. The site 3.10.2
10 km, coordinates, google map, superimposed on toposheet
layout map, land use, geological and co-ordinate map is
features and geo-hydrological provided in Figure 1.2 and
status of the study area, 1.3 respectively.
drainage) The project layout is shown
in Annex 2.2. The land-use
map describing the features
in 10 km radius is given in
Figure 3.7. The geological,
hydro-geological and
drainage features are
described in Chapter 3.
3. Land use as per the approved The project area of 2.0235 ha - -
Master Plan of the area, is under possession of the
Permission /approvals required Proponent and has been
from the land owning agencies, allotted by West Bengal
Development Authorities, Local Housing infrastructure
Body, Water Supply & Development Corporation
Sewerage Board, etc Limited. The land documents
are given in Annex 2.1.
The water requirement of the
project will be met by New
Town Kolkata Development
Authority. The wastewater
generated will be treated in
STP of 40 KLD capacity
based on MBBR technology.
4. Land acquisition status, R&R There is no R&R associated - -
details with this project
5. Forest and Wildlife and eco- There are no forest in the - -
sensitive zones, if any in the project site nor there any
study area of 10 km - Clearances wildlife sanctuary or national
Compliance
Reference
Sl. No. TOR Point
Chapter No.
Annex
required under the Forest park within 10km of the
(Conservation) Act, 1980, the project.
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 East Calcutta Wetlands lie at
and/or the Environment a distance of 1.5 km from the
(Protection) Act, 1986 project site.
6. Baseline environmental study AAQ for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, Chapter 3 Section 3.7,
for ambient air (PM10, PM2.5, NOx & CO has been 3.8.3, 3.10 &
SO2, NOx & CO), water (both monitored from 6 locations. 3.11
surface and ground), noise and Water quality, noise level
soil for one month (except and soil quality has been
monsoon period) as per monitored as per MoEF&
MoEF&CC/CPCB guidelines at CPCB guidelines.
minimum 5 locations in the
study area of 10 Km.
7. Details on flora and fauna and Details of flora, fauna and Chapter 3 Section 3.15 &
socio-economic aspects in the socio-economic aspects of 3.16
study area the study area has been
described in Chapter 3
8. Likely impact of the project on For impact, please refer Chapter 4 Section 4.3.1.2,
the environmental parameters section 4.3 of Chapter 4 of 4.3.1.5, 4.31.1,
(ambient air, surface and ground EIA/EMP Report. 4.3.1.7 &
water, land, flora & fauna and 4.3.1.8
socio-economic, etc),
9. Source of water for different The water during operation - -
identified purposes with the phase shall be taken from
permissions required from the New Town Kolkata
concerned authorities, both for Development Authority.
surface water and the ground
water (by CGWA) as the case
may be, Rain water harvesting,
etc,
10. Waste water management The waste water generated Chapter 2 Section 2.4.4
(treatment, reuse and disposal) from the project shall be
for the project and also the study treated in STP and then
area reused for various purposes.
No water body or drainage
channels are getting affected
in the study area because of
this project.
11. Management of solid waste and No demolition was involved Chapter 4 Section 4.3.1.4
the construction & demolition in this project and
waste for the project vis-a-vis construction of the project is
the Solid Waste Management already complete. Disposal
Rules, 2016 and the mechanism of solid waste is
Construction & Demolition given in Chapter 4
Rules, 2016
12. Energy efficient measures (LED Energy conservation Chapter 4 Section 4.3.1.9
lights, solar power, etc) during measures to be adopted in
Compliance
Reference
Sl. No. TOR Point
Chapter No.
Annex
construction as well as during given in Chapter 4
operational phase of the project
13. Assessment of ecological Assessment of ecological Chapter 13 -
damage with respect to air, damage has been described
water, land and other in Chapter 13
environmental attributes. The
collection and analysis of data
shall be done by an
environmental laboratory duly
notified under the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986, or an
environmental laboratory
accredited by NABL, or a
laboratory of a Council of
Scientific and Industrial
Research (CSIR) institution
working in the field of
environment.
14. Preparation of EMP comprising Please refer Chapter 13 Chapter 13 -
remediation plan and natural and
community resource
augmentation plan
corresponding to the ecological
damage assessed and economic
benefits derived due to
violation.
15. The remediation plan and the Complied Chapter 13 -
natural and community resource
augmentation plan to be
prepared as an independent
chapter in the EIA report by the
accredited consultants.
ANNEX 1.3
RELEVANT STANDARDS
ANNEX-1.4: RELEVANT STANDARDS
A. National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Concentration in µg/mg3 except for CO in
mg/m3
Pollutant Time Residential, Method of Measurement
Industrial Sensitive
Rural & other
Area area
areas
Sulphur Dioxide Annual Avg. 50 50 20 Improved West and Gaeke Method
24 hours 80 80 80
Oxides of Annual Avg. 40 40 30 Modified Jacob and Hochheiser
Nitrogen (Na-Arsenite) Method
24 hours 80 80 80
Carbon 8 hours 02 02 02 Non Dispersive Infra Red
Monoxide 1 hour 04 04 04 Spectroscopy (NDIR)
Particulate Annual Avg. 60 60 60 Gravimetric

Matter 10 (PM
10) 24 hours 100 100 100
Particulate Annual Avg. 40 40 40 Gravimetric
Matter 2.5 (PM
2.5) 24 hours 60 60 60
Benzene Annual 05 05 05 Gas Chromatography
Source: Gazette of India Notification, dated 16th Nov, 2009
* Annual Arithmetic Means of minimum 104 measurements in a year at a particular site taken twice a week 24 hourly at
uniform intervals
** 24 hourly or 8 hourly or 01 hourly monitored values, as applicable shall be complied with 98% of the time in a year. 2%
of the time they may exceed the limits but not on two consecutive days of monitoring
B. Ambient Noise Standards, CPCB

Noise Levels (dB (A) Leq (Limits)
Area Code Category of Area Night time
Day time (0600hrs to 2200hrs)
(2200hrs to 0600hrs)
A Industrial Area 75 70
B Commercial Area 65 55
C Residential Area 55 45
D Silence Zone 50 40
C. Standard Classification of Soil
1. pH <4.5 Extremely acidic
4.51- 5.50 Very strongly acidic
5.51-6.0 moderately acidic
6.01-6.50 slightly acidic
6.51-7.30 Neutral
7.31-7.80 slightly alkaline
7.81-8.50 moderately alkaline
8.51-9.0 strongly alkaline
9.01 very strongly alkaline
Salinity Electrical Conductivity Upto 1.00 Average
2 (mmhos/cm) 1.01-2.00 harmful to germination
(1 ppm = 640 mmho/cm) 2.01-3.00 harmful to crops (sensitive to salts)
Page | 1
Organic Carbon Upto 0.2: very less
0.21-0.4: less
0.41-0.5 medium,
3
0.51-0.8: on an average sufficient
0.81-1.00: sufficient
>1.0 more than sufficient
Nitrogen (Kg/ha) Upto 50 very less
51-100 less
4 101-150 good
151-300 Better
>300 sufficient
Phosphorus (Kg/ha) Upto 15 very less
16-30 less
31-50 medium,
5
51-65 on an average sufficient
66-80 sufficient
Potash (Kg/ha) 0 -120 very less
120-180 less
181-240 medium
6
241-300 average
301-360 better
Source: Handbook of Agriculture, Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi 1961.
D. Methods and Unit of Soil Parameters
Sl. No. Parameters Unit Test Methods
1 Soil colour ---- Visual Analysis
2 pH ---- IS2720- Part 26, 1987 by pH meter
3 Electrical Conductivity µmhos /cm IS:14767, 2000, Reaffirmed 2010
4 Moisture Content % IS2720-(Part II),1973, Reaffirmed 2005
Department of Agriculture & Cooperation, Page No.

5 Soil texture ----
67-70:2011
i Clay % -
ii Silt % -
iii Sand % -
6 Infiltration Rate cm/hr USDA Method
7 Bulk density lb/ft3 USDA Method
gm/cm3
8 Porosity % USDA Method
9 Nitrogen as N % IS:5194, 1969, Reaffirmed 2006

10 Phosphorus mg/Kg
95-99:2011
Page | 2
Sl. No. Parameters Unit Test Methods

11 Potassium as K mg/Kg
99-100:2011
IS2720-(Part 22),1972, Reaffirmed 2001 (By

12 Organic Carbon %
Calculation)
13 Organic matter % IS2720-(Part 22),1972, Reaffirmed 2001
E. Water Quality Criteria as per CPCB

Designated-Best-Use Class of water Criteria
Drinking Water Source without A Total Coliform Organism MPN/100ml shall be 50 or less
conventional treatment but after pH between 6.5 and 8.5
disinfection Dissolved Oxygen 6mg/l or more
Biochemical Oxygen Demand 5 days 20°C 2mg/l or less
Outdoor bathing (Organized) B Total Coliform Organism MPN/100ml shall be 500 or less
pH between 6.5 and 8.5 Dissolved Oxygen 5mg/l or more
Drinking water source after C Total Coliform Organism MPN/100ml shall be 5000 or less
conventional treatment and disinfection pH between 6 to 9 Dissolved Oxygen 4mg/l or more
Propagation of Wild life and Fisheries D pH between 6.5 to 8.5 Dissolved Oxygen 4mg/l or more
Free Ammonia (as N) 1.2 mg/l or less
Irrigation, Industrial Cooling, Controlled E pH between 6.0 to 8.5
Waste disposal Electrical Conductivity at 25°C micro mhos/cm Max.2250
Sodium absorption Ratio Max. 26
Boron Max. 2mg/l
Below - E Not Meeting A, B, C, D & E Criteria
Page | 3
ANNEX 2.1
LAND DOCUMENTS
ANNEX 2.2
MASTER PLAN OF PROJECT
SITE
ANNEX 2.3
POWER APPROVAL
ANNEX 2.4
ROOF TOP LAYOUT SHOWING
LOCATION OF SOLAR PANELS
ANNEX 2.5
WATER APPROVAL
ANNEX 2.6
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION &
DISPOSAL PERMISSION
ANNEX 3.1
HOURLY ONSITE
METEOROLOGICAL DATA
HOURLY ONSITE METEOROLOGICAL DATA
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 1 1.00 22.00 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 1 2.00 22.80 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 1 3.00 23.60 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 1 4.00 24.40 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 1 5.00 25.20 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 1 6.00 26.00 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 1 7.00 26.80 10.7 3.0 64.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 1 8.00 27.60 10.8 3.0 64.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 1 9.00 28.40 10.9 3.0 64.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 1 10.00 29.20 11.0 3.1 64.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 1 11.00 31.80 11.1 3.1 64.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 1 12.00 32.00 11.2 3.1 64.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 1 13.00 33.00 11.3 3.1 57.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 1 14.00 31.80 11.4 3.2 57.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 1 15.00 30.60 11.5 3.2 57.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 1 16.00 29.40 11.4 3.2 57.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 1 17.00 28.20 11.3 3.1 57.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 1 18.00 27.00 11.2 3.1 57.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 1 19.00 25.80 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 270 w
18 4 1 20.00 24.60 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 270 w
18 4 1 21.00 23.40 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 270 w
18 4 1 22.00 22.20 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 270 w
18 4 1 23.00 21.40 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 270 w
18 4 1 24.00 21.00 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 270 w
18 4 2 1.00 22.00 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 2 2.00 21.10 10.4 2.9 67.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 2 3.00 22.10 10.3 2.9 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 2 4.00 23.10 10.2 2.8 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 2 5.00 24.10 10.1 2.8 64.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 2 6.00 25.10 10.0 2.8 63.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 2 7.00 26.10 9.9 2.8 64.0 0.0 22.5 NNE
18 4 2 8.00 27.10 9.8 2.7 64.0 0.0 22.5 NNE
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 2 9.00 28.10 9.7 2.7 64.0 0.0 22.5 NNE
18 4 2 10.00 29.10 9.6 2.7 64.0 0.0 22.5 NNE
18 4 2 11.00 30.10 9.5 2.6 64.0 0.0 22.5 NNE
18 4 2 12.00 31.10 9.6 2.7 64.0 0.0 22.5 NNE
18 4 2 13.00 32.00 9.7 2.7 55.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 2 14.00 31.00 9.8 2.7 55.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 2 15.00 30.00 9.9 2.8 55.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 2 16.00 29.00 10.0 2.8 55.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 2 17.00 28.00 10.1 2.8 55.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 2 18.00 27.00 10.2 2.8 55.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 2 19.00 26.00 10.3 2.9 69.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 2 20.00 25.00 10.4 2.9 69.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 2 21.00 24.00 10.5 2.9 69.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 2 22.00 23.00 10.6 2.9 69.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 2 23.00 22.50 10.7 3.0 69.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 2 24.00 22.00 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 1.00 22.80 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 2.00 23.60 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 3.00 24.40 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 4.00 25.20 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 5.00 26.00 11.3 3.1 68.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 6.00 26.80 11.4 3.2 68.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 7.00 27.60 11.3 3.1 62.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 8.00 28.40 11.2 3.1 62.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 9.00 29.20 11.1 3.1 62.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 10.00 30.00 11.0 3.1 62.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 11.00 30.80 10.9 3.0 62.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 12.00 31.60 10.8 3.0 62.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 3 13.00 32.00 10.7 3.0 41.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 3 14.00 31.10 10.6 2.9 41.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 3 15.00 30.20 10.5 2.9 41.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 3 16.00 29.30 10.4 2.9 41.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 3 17.00 28.40 10.3 2.9 41.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 3 18.00 27.50 10.2 2.8 41.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 3 19.00 26.60 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 3 20.00 25.70 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 3 21.00 24.80 9.9 2.8 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 3 22.00 23.90 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 3 23.00 23.00 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 3 24.00 22.50 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 4 1.00 22.00 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 2.00 22.80 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 3.00 23.60 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 4.00 24.40 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 5.00 25.20 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 6.00 26.00 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 7.00 27.80 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 8.00 29.60 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 9.00 31.40 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 10.00 33.20 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 11.00 33.00 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 12.00 34.00 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 4 13.00 35.00 10.7 3.0 46.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 4 14.00 34.00 10.8 3.0 46.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 4 15.00 33.00 10.9 3.0 46.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 4 16.00 32.00 11.0 3.1 46.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 4 17.00 31.00 11.1 3.1 46.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 4 18.00 30.00 11.2 3.1 46.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 4 19.00 29.00 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 4 20.00 28.00 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 4 21.00 27.00 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 4 22.00 26.00 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 4 23.00 25.00 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 4 24.00 25.10 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 5 1.00 25.00 10.5 2.9 67.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 5 2.00 22.80 10.4 2.9 67.0 0.0 135 SE
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 5 3.00 23.70 10.3 2.9 67.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 5 4.00 24.60 10.2 2.8 67.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 5 5.00 25.50 10.1 2.8 67.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 5 6.00 26.40 10.0 2.8 67.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 5 7.00 27.30 9.9 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 8.00 28.20 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 9.00 29.10 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 10.00 30.00 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 11.00 30.90 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 12.00 31.80 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 13.00 32.80 9.5 2.6 45.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 14.00 31.90 9.6 2.7 45.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 15.00 31.00 9.7 2.7 45.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 16.00 30.10 9.8 2.7 45.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 17.00 29.20 9.9 2.7 45.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 18.00 28.30 10.0 2.8 45.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 19.00 27.40 10.1 2.8 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 20.00 26.50 10.2 2.8 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 21.00 25.60 10.3 2.9 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 22.00 24.70 10.4 2.9 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 23.00 23.80 10.5 2.9 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 5 24.00 23.00 10.6 2.9 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 1.00 23.50 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 2.00 24.40 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 3.00 25.30 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 4.00 26.20 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 5.00 27.10 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 6.00 28.00 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 7.00 28.90 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 8.00 29.80 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 9.00 30.70 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 10.00 31.60 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 11.00 32.50 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 12.00 33.40 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 6 13.00 33.60 10.5 2.9 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 14.00 33.00 10.4 2.9 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 15.00 32.10 10.3 2.9 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 16.00 31.20 10.2 2.8 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 17.00 30.30 10.1 2.8 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 18.00 29.40 10.0 2.8 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 19.00 28.50 9.9 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 20.00 27.60 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 21.00 26.70 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 22.00 25.80 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 23.00 24.90 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 6 24.00 23.50 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 1.00 22.40 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 2.00 23.50 9.2 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 3.00 24.60 9.1 2.5 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 4.00 25.70 9.0 2.5 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 5.00 26.80 8.9 2.5 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 6.00 27.90 8.8 2.4 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 7.00 29.00 8.9 2.5 67.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 7 8.00 30.10 9.0 2.5 67.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 7 9.00 31.20 9.1 2.5 67.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 7 10.00 32.30 9.2 2.6 67.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 7 11.00 33.10 9.3 2.6 67.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 7 12.00 33.70 9.4 2.6 67.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 7 13.00 33.20 9.5 2.6 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 14.00 32.80 9.6 2.7 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 15.00 31.80 9.7 2.7 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 16.00 30.80 9.8 2.7 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 17.00 29.80 9.9 2.7 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 18.00 28.80 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 7 19.00 27.80 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 7 20.00 26.80 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 7 21.00 25.80 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 7 22.00 24.80 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 7 23.00 23.80 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 7 24.00 22.40 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 8 1.00 21.00 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 2.00 21.80 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 3.00 22.60 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 4.00 23.40 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 5.00 24.20 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 6.00 25.00 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 7.00 25.80 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 8 8.00 26.60 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 8 9.00 27.40 11.3 3.1 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 8 10.00 28.20 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 8 11.00 29.00 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 8 12.00 29.80 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 337.5 NNW
18 4 8 13.00 31.00 10.9 3.0 52.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 8 14.00 30.10 10.8 3.0 52.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 8 15.00 29.20 10.7 3.0 52.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 8 16.00 28.30 10.6 2.9 52.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 8 17.00 27.40 10.5 2.9 52.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 8 18.00 26.50 10.4 2.9 52.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 8 19.00 25.60 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 20.00 24.70 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 21.00 23.80 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 22.00 22.90 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 23.00 22.00 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 8 24.00 23.00 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 9 1.00 24.00 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 9 2.00 24.80 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 9 3.00 25.60 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 9 4.00 26.40 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 9 5.00 27.20 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 9 6.00 28.00 9.2 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 9 7.00 28.80 9.1 2.5 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 9 8.00 29.60 9.0 2.5 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 9 9.00 30.40 8.9 2.5 68.0 0.0 90 E
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 9 10.00 31.20 8.8 2.4 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 9 11.00 32.00 8.7 2.4 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 9 12.00 32.80 8.8 0.9 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 9 13.00 34.00 8.9 2.5 59.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 9 14.00 32.90 9.0 2.5 59.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 9 15.00 31.80 9.1 2.5 59.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 9 16.00 30.70 9.2 2.6 59.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 9 17.00 29.60 9.3 2.6 59.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 9 18.00 28.50 9.4 2.6 59.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 9 19.00 27.40 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 9 20.00 26.30 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 9 21.00 25.20 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 9 22.00 24.10 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 9 23.00 23.00 9.9 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 9 24.00 21.90 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 1.00 20.00 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 2.00 21.20 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 3.00 22.40 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 4.00 23.60 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 5.00 24.80 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 6.00 26.00 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 7.00 27.20 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 10 8.00 28.40 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 10 9.00 29.60 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 10 10.00 30.80 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 10 11.00 32.00 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 10 12.00 33.20 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 10 13.00 34.00 10.9 3.0 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 14.00 33.20 10.8 3.0 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 15.00 32.40 10.7 3.0 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 16.00 31.60 10.6 2.9 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 17.00 30.80 10.5 2.9 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 18.00 30.00 10.4 2.9 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 19.00 29.20 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 20.00 28.40 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 10 21.00 27.60 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 22.00 26.80 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 23.00 26.00 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 10 24.00 25.20 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 11 1.00 26.00 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 2.00 26.80 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 3.00 27.60 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 4.00 28.40 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 5.00 29.20 9.9 2.8 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 6.00 30.00 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 7.00 30.80 10.1 2.8 66.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 11 8.00 31.60 10.2 2.8 66.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 11 9.00 32.40 10.3 2.9 66.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 11 10.00 33.20 10.4 2.9 66.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 11 11.00 34.00 10.5 2.9 66.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 11 12.00 34.80 10.6 2.9 66.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 11 13.00 35.00 10.7 3.0 56.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 11 14.00 33.90 10.8 3.0 56.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 11 15.00 32.80 10.9 3.0 56.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 11 16.00 31.70 11.0 3.1 56.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 11 17.00 30.60 10.9 3.0 56.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 11 18.00 29.50 10.8 3.0 56.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 11 19.00 28.40 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 20.00 27.30 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 21.00 26.20 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 22.00 25.10 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 23.00 24.00 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 11 24.00 22.90 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 12 1.00 22.00 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 2.00 23.10 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 3.00 24.20 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 4.00 25.30 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 12 5.00 26.40 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 6.00 27.50 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 7.00 28.60 9.5 2.6 61.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 8.00 29.70 9.4 2.6 61.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 9.00 30.80 9.3 2.6 61.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 10.00 31.90 9.2 2.6 61.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 11.00 33.00 9.1 2.5 61.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 12.00 34.10 9.0 2.5 61.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 13.00 35.00 8.9 2.5 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 14.00 33.80 8.8 2.4 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 15.00 32.60 8.7 2.4 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 16.00 31.40 8.8 2.4 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 17.00 30.20 8.9 2.5 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 18.00 29.00 9.0 2.5 57.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 12 19.00 27.80 9.1 2.5 68.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 12 20.00 26.60 9.2 2.6 68.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 12 21.00 25.40 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 12 22.00 24.20 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 12 23.00 23.20 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 12 24.00 23.00 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 13 1.00 22.80 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 2.00 24.00 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 3.00 25.20 9.9 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 4.00 26.40 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 5.00 27.60 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 6.00 28.80 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 7.00 30.00 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 13 8.00 31.20 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 13 9.00 32.40 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 13 10.00 33.60 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 13 11.00 34.80 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 225 SW
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 13 12.00 36.00 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 13 13.00 37.00 10.9 3.0 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 14.00 36.10 11.0 3.1 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 15.00 35.20 10.9 3.0 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 16.00 34.30 10.8 3.0 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 17.00 33.40 10.7 3.0 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 18.00 32.50 10.6 2.9 51.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 19.00 31.60 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 20.00 30.70 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 21.00 29.80 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 22.00 28.90 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 23.00 28.30 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 13 24.00 28.00 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 14 1.00 27.00 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 14 2.00 28.10 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 14 3.00 29.20 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 14 4.00 30.30 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 14 5.00 31.40 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 14 6.00 32.50 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 14 7.00 33.60 9.3 2.6 65.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 14 8.00 34.70 9.2 2.6 65.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 14 9.00 35.80 9.1 2.5 65.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 14 10.00 36.90 9.0 2.5 65.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 14 11.00 38.00 8.9 2.5 65.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 14 12.00 38.80 8.8 2.4 65.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 14 13.00 39.00 8.9 2.5 44.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 14 14.00 37.80 9.0 2.5 44.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 14 15.00 36.60 9.1 2.5 44.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 14 16.00 35.40 9.2 2.6 44.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 14 17.00 34.20 9.3 2.6 44.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 14 18.00 33.00 9.4 2.6 44.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 14 19.00 31.80 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 14 20.00 30.60 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 14 21.00 29.40 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 14 22.00 28.20 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 14 23.00 27.80 9.9 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 14 24.00 27.00 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 1.00 26.00 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 15 2.00 27.10 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 15 3.00 28.20 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 15 4.00 29.30 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 15 5.00 30.40 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 15 6.00 31.50 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 15 7.00 32.60 10.7 3.0 54.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 8.00 33.70 10.8 3.0 54.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 9.00 34.80 10.9 3.0 54.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 10.00 35.90 11.0 3.1 54.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 11.00 37.00 11.1 3.1 54.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 12.00 37.80 11.0 3.1 54.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 13.00 38.00 10.9 3.0 36.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 15 14.00 37.10 10.8 3.0 36.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 15 15.00 36.20 10.7 3.0 36.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 15 16.00 35.30 10.6 2.9 36.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 15 17.00 34.40 10.5 2.9 36.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 15 18.00 33.50 10.4 2.9 36.0 0.0 270 W
18 4 15 19.00 32.60 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 20.00 31.70 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 21.00 30.80 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 22.00 29.90 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 23.00 29.00 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 15 24.00 28.00 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 16 1.00 28.90 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 16 2.00 29.80 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 16 3.00 30.70 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 16 4.00 31.60 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 16 5.00 32.50 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 16 6.00 33.40 9.2 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 16 7.00 34.30 9.1 2.5 65.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 16 8.00 35.20 9.0 2.5 65.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 16 9.00 36.10 8.9 2.5 65.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 16 10.00 37.00 8.8 2.4 65.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 16 11.00 37.90 8.7 2.4 65.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 16 12.00 38.80 8.6 2.4 65.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 16 13.00 39.00 8.5 2.4 45.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 16 14.00 37.90 8.4 2.3 45.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 16 15.00 36.80 8.3 2.3 45.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 16 16.00 35.70 8.2 2.3 45.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 16 17.00 34.60 8.3 2.3 45.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 16 18.00 33.50 8.4 2.3 45.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 16 19.00 32.40 8.5 2.4 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 16 20.00 31.30 8.6 2.4 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 16 21.00 30.20 8.7 2.4 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 16 22.00 29.10 8.8 2.4 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 16 23.00 28.50 8.9 2.5 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 16 24.00 28.30 9.0 2.5 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 1.00 28.00 9.1 2.5 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 2.00 29.00 9.2 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 3.00 30.00 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 4.00 31.00 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 5.00 32.00 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 6.00 33.00 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 7.00 34.00 9.7 2.7 64.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 8.00 35.00 9.8 2.7 64.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 9.00 36.00 9.9 2.8 64.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 10.00 37.00 10.0 2.8 64.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 11.00 38.00 10.1 2.8 64.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 12.00 39.00 10.2 2.8 64.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 13.00 40.00 10.3 2.9 40.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 17 14.00 38.50 10.4 2.9 40.0 0.0 225 SW
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 17 15.00 37.00 10.5 2.9 40.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 17 16.00 35.50 10.6 3.0 40.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 17 17.00 34.00 10.7 3.0 40.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 17 18.00 32.50 10.8 3.0 40.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 17 19.00 31.00 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 20.00 29.50 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 21.00 28.00 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 22.00 26.50 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 23.00 25.00 10.6 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 17 24.00 24.00 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 1.00 24.90 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 45 NE
18 4 18 2.00 25.80 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 45 NE
18 4 18 3.00 26.70 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 45 NE
18 4 18 4.00 27.60 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 45 NE
18 4 18 5.00 28.50 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 45 NE
18 4 18 6.00 29.40 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 45 NE
18 4 18 7.00 30.30 9.7 2.7 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 8.00 31.20 9.6 2.7 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 9.00 32.10 9.6 2.7 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 10.00 33.00 9.7 2.7 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 11.00 33.90 9.8 2.7 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 12.00 34.80 9.9 2.8 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 13.00 35.00 10.0 2.8 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 14.00 34.20 10.1 2.8 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 15.00 33.40 10.2 2.8 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 16.00 32.60 10.3 2.9 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 17.00 31.80 10.4 2.9 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 18.00 31.00 10.5 2.9 65.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 19.00 30.20 10.6 2.9 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 20.00 29.40 10.7 3.0 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 21.00 28.60 10.8 3.0 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 22.00 27.80 10.9 3.0 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 18 23.00 27.00 11.0 3.1 66.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 18 24.00 28.00 11.1 3.1 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 1.00 27.00 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 19 2.00 27.80 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 19 3.00 28.60 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 19 4.00 29.40 10.6 3.0 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 19 5.00 30.20 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 19 6.00 31.00 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 19 7.00 31.80 10.3 2.9 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 8.00 32.60 10.1 2.8 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 9.00 33.40 10.0 2.8 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 10.00 34.20 9.9 2.8 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 11.00 35.00 9.8 2.7 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 12.00 35.80 9.7 2.7 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 13.00 37.00 9.5 2.6 58.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 14.00 36.20 9.4 2.6 58.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 15.00 35.40 9.3 2.6 58.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 16.00 34.60 9.2 2.5 58.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 17.00 33.80 9.0 2.5 58.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 18.00 33.00 9.1 2.5 58.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 19.00 32.20 9.2 2.5 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 20.00 31.40 9.2 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 21.00 30.60 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 22.00 29.80 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 23.00 29.20 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 19 24.00 29.00 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 1.00 28.00 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 2.00 28.80 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 3.00 29.60 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 4.00 30.40 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 5.00 31.20 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 6.00 32.00 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 7.00 32.80 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 8.00 33.60 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 20 9.00 34.40 9.9 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 10.00 35.20 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 11.00 36.00 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 12.00 36.80 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 13.00 37.00 10.1 2.8 63.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 14.00 36.10 10.2 2.8 63.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 15.00 35.20 10.2 2.8 63.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 16.00 34.30 10.3 2.9 63.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 17.00 33.40 10.4 2.9 63.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 18.00 32.50 10.4 2.9 63.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 19.00 31.60 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 20.00 30.70 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 21.00 29.80 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 22.00 28.90 10.6 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 23.00 29.00 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 20 24.00 30.00 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 1.00 29.00 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 2.00 29.70 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 3.00 30.40 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 4.00 31.10 11.0 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 5.00 31.80 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 6.00 32.50 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 7.00 33.20 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 21 8.00 33.90 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 21 9.00 34.60 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 21 10.00 35.30 11.3 3.1 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 21 11.00 36.00 11.3 3.1 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 21 12.00 36.70 11.4 3.2 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 21 13.00 37.00 11.4 3.2 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 14.00 36.30 11.5 3.2 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 15.00 35.60 11.6 3.2 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 16.00 34.90 11.5 3.2 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 17.00 34.20 11.4 3.2 62.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 21 18.00 33.50 11.4 3.2 62.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 19.00 32.80 11.3 3.2 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 20.00 32.10 11.3 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 21.00 31.40 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 22.00 30.70 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 23.00 30.20 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 21 24.00 30.00 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 22 1.00 29.00 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 22 2.00 29.60 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 22 3.00 30.20 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 22 4.00 30.80 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 22 5.00 31.40 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 22 6.00 32.00 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 22 7.00 32.60 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 8.00 33.20 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 9.00 33.80 10.6 3.0 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 10.00 34.40 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 11.00 35.00 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 12.00 35.60 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 13.00 36.00 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 14.00 35.20 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 15.00 34.40 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 16.00 33.60 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 17.00 32.80 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 18.00 32.00 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 22 19.00 31.20 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 22 20.00 30.40 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 22 21.00 29.60 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 22 22.00 28.80 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 22 23.00 28.00 9.9 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 22 24.00 27.80 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 1.00 27.00 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 2.00 27.90 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 23 3.00 28.80 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 4.00 29.70 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 5.00 30.60 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 6.00 31.50 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 7.00 32.40 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 23 8.00 33.30 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 23 9.00 34.20 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 23 10.00 35.10 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 23 11.00 36.00 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 23 12.00 36.90 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 225 SW
18 4 23 13.00 37.00 10.5 2.9 59.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 23 14.00 36.00 10.6 2.9 59.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 23 15.00 35.00 10.7 3.0 59.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 23 16.00 34.00 10.8 3.0 59.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 23 17.00 33.00 10.9 3.0 59.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 23 18.00 32.00 10.9 3.0 59.0 0.0 67.5 ENE
18 4 23 19.00 31.00 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 20.00 30.00 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 21.00 29.00 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 22.00 28.00 11.3 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 23.00 27.50 11.3 3.2 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 23 24.00 27.00 11.4 3.2 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 24 1.00 26.00 11.5 3.2 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 24 2.00 27.20 11.6 3.2 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 24 3.00 28.40 11.7 3.2 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 24 4.00 29.60 11.7 3.3 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 24 5.00 30.80 11.6 3.2 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 24 6.00 32.00 11.5 3.2 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 24 7.00 33.20 11.3 3.1 68.0 0.0 292.5 WNW
18 4 24 8.00 34.40 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 292.5 WNW
18 4 24 9.00 35.60 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 292.5 WNW
18 4 24 10.00 36.80 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 292.5 WNW
18 4 24 11.00 38.00 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 292.5 WNW
18 4 24 12.00 38.70 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 292.5 WNW
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 24 13.00 39.00 10.4 2.9 39.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 24 14.00 38.10 10.3 2.9 39.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 24 15.00 37.20 10.1 2.8 39.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 24 16.00 36.30 10.0 2.8 39.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 24 17.00 35.40 9.8 2.7 39.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 24 18.00 34.50 9.7 2.7 39.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 24 19.00 33.60 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 24 20.00 32.70 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 24 21.00 31.80 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 24 22.00 30.90 9.1 2.5 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 24 23.00 30.00 9.0 2.5 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 24 24.00 29.00 8.8 2.5 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 25 1.00 28.00 8.7 2.4 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 2.00 28.90 8.5 2.4 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 3.00 29.80 8.4 2.3 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 4.00 30.70 8.5 2.4 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 5.00 31.60 8.6 2.4 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 6.00 32.50 8.7 2.4 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 7.00 33.40 8.8 2.5 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 25 8.00 34.30 9.0 2.5 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 25 9.00 35.20 9.1 2.5 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 25 10.00 36.10 9.2 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 25 11.00 37.00 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 25 12.00 37.90 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 202.5 SSW
18 4 25 13.00 38.00 9.5 2.6 59.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 14.00 37.10 9.6 2.7 59.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 15.00 36.20 9.8 2.7 59.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 16.00 35.30 9.9 2.7 59.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 17.00 34.40 10.0 2.8 59.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 18.00 33.50 10.1 2.8 59.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 25 19.00 32.60 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 25 20.00 31.70 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 25 21.00 30.80 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 25 22.00 29.90 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 25 23.00 29.00 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 25 24.00 28.00 10.8 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 26 1.00 27.00 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 26 2.00 27.80 11.0 3.1 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 26 3.00 28.60 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 26 4.00 29.40 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 26 5.00 30.20 11.3 3.2 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 26 6.00 31.00 11.5 3.2 68.0 0.0 112.5 ESE
18 4 26 7.00 31.80 11.6 3.2 62.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 26 8.00 32.60 11.5 3.2 62.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 26 9.00 33.40 11.4 3.2 62.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 26 10.00 34.20 11.4 3.2 62.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 26 11.00 35.00 11.3 3.1 62.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 26 12.00 35.80 11.2 3.1 62.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 26 13.00 36.00 11.1 3.1 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 26 14.00 35.10 11.1 3.1 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 26 15.00 34.20 11.0 3.1 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 26 16.00 33.30 10.9 3.0 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 26 17.00 32.40 10.8 3.0 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 26 18.00 31.50 10.8 3.0 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 26 19.00 30.60 10.7 3.0 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 26 20.00 29.70 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 26 21.00 28.80 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 26 22.00 27.90 10.5 2.9 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 26 23.00 27.00 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 26 24.00 26.00 10.3 2.9 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 27 1.00 25.00 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 27 2.00 25.90 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 27 3.00 26.80 10.1 2.8 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 27 4.00 27.70 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 27 5.00 28.60 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 27 6.00 29.50 9.9 2.7 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 27 7.00 30.40 9.8 2.7 58.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 8.00 31.30 9.7 2.7 58.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 9.00 32.20 9.7 2.7 58.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 10.00 33.10 9.6 2.7 58.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 11.00 34.00 9.5 2.6 58.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 12.00 34.90 9.4 2.6 58.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 13.00 36.00 9.4 2.6 52.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 14.00 35.10 9.3 2.6 52.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 15.00 34.20 9.2 2.6 52.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 16.00 33.30 9.1 2.5 52.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 17.00 32.40 9.1 2.5 52.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 18.00 31.50 9.0 2.5 52.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 27 19.00 30.60 8.9 2.5 68.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 27 20.00 29.70 8.8 2.5 68.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 27 21.00 28.80 8.8 2.4 68.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 27 22.00 27.90 8.7 2.4 68.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 27 23.00 27.00 8.8 2.4 68.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 27 24.00 26.00 8.9 2.5 68.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 28 1.00 25.00 9.0 2.5 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 28 2.00 25.90 9.1 2.5 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 28 3.00 26.80 9.2 2.6 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 28 4.00 27.70 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 28 5.00 28.60 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 28 6.00 29.50 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 90 E
18 4 28 7.00 30.40 9.6 2.7 58.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 28 8.00 31.30 9.7 2.7 58.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 28 9.00 32.20 9.8 2.7 58.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 28 10.00 33.10 9.9 2.8 58.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 28 11.00 34.00 10.0 2.8 58.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 28 12.00 34.90 10.1 2.8 58.0 0.0 247.5 WSW
18 4 28 13.00 36.00 10.2 2.8 47.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 28 14.00 35.30 10.3 2.9 47.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 28 15.00 34.60 10.4 2.9 47.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 28 16.00 33.90 10.5 2.9 47.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 28 17.00 33.20 10.7 3.0 47.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 28 18.00 32.50 10.8 3.0 47.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 28 19.00 31.80 10.9 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 28 20.00 31.10 11.0 3.0 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 28 21.00 30.40 11.1 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 28 22.00 29.70 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 28 23.00 29.00 11.3 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 28 24.00 28.00 11.4 3.2 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 1.00 27.00 11.5 3.2 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 2.00 27.90 11.6 3.2 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 3.00 28.80 11.5 3.2 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 4.00 29.70 11.4 3.2 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 5.00 30.60 11.3 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 6.00 31.50 11.2 3.1 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 7.00 32.40 11.1 3.1 66.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 29 8.00 33.30 11.0 3.1 66.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 29 9.00 34.20 10.9 3.0 66.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 29 10.00 35.10 10.8 3.0 66.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 29 11.00 36.00 10.7 3.0 66.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 29 12.00 36.90 10.6 2.9 66.0 0.0 135 SE
18 4 29 13.00 37.00 10.5 2.9 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 14.00 36.20 10.4 2.9 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 15.00 35.40 10.3 2.9 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 16.00 34.60 10.2 2.8 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 17.00 33.80 10.1 2.8 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 18.00 33.00 10.0 2.8 52.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 19.00 32.20 9.9 2.8 66.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 20.00 31.40 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 21.00 30.60 9.7 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 22.00 29.80 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 23.00 29.00 9.5 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 29 24.00 28.00 9.4 2.6 68.0 0.0 180 S
Wind Speed
Wind Speed
Temp(°C)
Humidity
Direction
Direction
(Mtrs/S)
Relative
Rainfall
(Km/h)
Month
(mm.)
Wind
Wind
Hour
Year
Day
(%)
18 4 30 1.00 27.00 9.3 2.6 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 2.00 27.90 9.2 2.6 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 3.00 28.80 9.1 2.5 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 4.00 29.70 9.0 2.5 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 5.00 30.60 8.9 2.5 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 6.00 31.50 8.8 2.4 68.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 7.00 32.40 8.7 2.4 64.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 8.00 33.30 8.6 2.4 64.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 9.00 34.20 8.5 2.4 64.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 10.00 35.10 8.4 2.3 64.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 11.00 36.00 8.3 2.3 64.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 12.00 36.90 8.2 2.3 64.0 0.0 157.5 SSE
18 4 30 13.00 37.00 8.4 2.3 48.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 14.00 36.10 8.6 2.4 48.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 15.00 35.20 8.8 2.4 48.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 16.00 34.30 9.0 2.5 48.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 17.00 33.40 9.2 2.6 48.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 18.00 32.50 9.4 2.6 48.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 19.00 31.60 9.6 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 20.00 30.70 9.8 2.7 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 21.00 29.80 10.0 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 22.00 28.90 10.2 2.8 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 23.00 28.00 10.4 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
18 4 30 24.00 27.00 10.6 2.9 68.0 0.0 180 S
ANNEX 4.1
PREDICTED GLCS
SUPERIMPOSED ON LANDUSE
MAP – 10KM FOR NOX
2 µg/m3
4 µg/m3
6 µg/m3
8 µg/m3
10 µg/m3
Annex 4.1: Predicted GLCs superimposed on Land-use Map - 10 km for

NOx (μg/m3)
ANNEX 4.1
PREDICTED GLCS
SUPERIMPOSED ON LANDUSE
MAP – 10KM FOR CO
2 µg/m3
2.5 µg/m3
3 µg/m3
3.5 µg/m3
4 µg/m3
Annex 4.2: Predicted GLCs superimposed on Land-use Map - 10 km for

CO (μg/m3)
ANNEX 5.1
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF
STP TECHNOLOGIES
ANNEX 5.1 ALTERNATE STP TECHNOLOGIES
Ten STP technologies are compared and explained in detailed in Tables below:
Facultative Aerated Activated Sludge

Parameters Waste Stabilization Pond Systems* Duckweed Pond System* Trickling Filter*
Lagoon* Process*
Advantage a. The inherent simplicity of a. Less sensitive to low a. Simple operation of the a. Simple operation a. Performance
construction offers low cost temperature, high nutrient plant requiring lower of the plant is not
technology option. levels, pH fluctuations, skilled manpower. requiring lower significantly
b. High quality effluent at least pests and diseases b. Minimum civil, skilled manpower. affected due to
operating costs. compared to other aquatic electrical and b. Rugged system, normal
c. Low skill requirement for plants. mechanical less prone to variations in
operation of the plant. b. Simultaneous significant installation. hydraulic and wastewater
d. Fish yield from aquaculture nutrient removal. c. Lower energy costs organic over characteristics
ponds around 4 ‐ 7 MT/ha/year c. Yield of highly protein compared to other loading. and seasonal
containing vegetative aerobic processes. c. Reduced changes
material (35 ‐ 45%) as d. Lower O&M cost requirement for
animal feed process
d. Duckweed as an excellent monitoring.
feed for poultry. d. Sludge with better
e. Realization of tangible settling
economic returns from sale characteristics
of raw or processed weed
or fish
Disadvantage a. Large land requirement a. Low pathogen removal a. Risk of groundwater a. Blockage of ports a. Performance
b. High cost of lining due to reduced light contamination in in distribution is adversely
c. Risk of odour nuisance and penetration. porous and fractured arm. affected due to
mosquito breeding b. Duckweed die off in cold strata. b. Blockage of bio- interruption in
d. Risk of groundwater contamination c. Weather conditions b. High cost of lining filter due to power supply
in porous and fractured strata excess biomass even for a
growth or floating short period.
matter. b. Foaming
Facultative Aerated Activated Sludge
Parameters Waste Stabilization Pond Systems* Duckweed Pond System* Trickling Filter*
Lagoon* Process*
c. Risk of odour and problem may

filter fly occur.
c. Requires
elaborate
sludge
digestion/dryin
g/disposal
arrangement
Land
0.15-0.25
Requirement 0.80-2.3 ha/MLD 2-6 ha/MLD 0.27-0.4 ha/MLD 0.25-0.65 ha/MLD
ha/MLD
Energy
Requirement Negligible Negligible 18 kWh/ML 180 kWh/ML 180-225 kWh/ML
Capital Cost
Of the same order as WSP
Rs. 2-4
Rs. 1.5-4.5 million per MLD with additional cost of Rs. 2.2-2.9 million/MLD Not available
million/MLD
floating cell material
O&M Cost
0.3-0.5
Rs. 0.60-0.1 million/year/MLD Rs. 0.18 million/year/MLD Rs. 0.15-0.2
Not available million/year/ML
installed capacity installed capacity million/MLD/year
D
Source: * Compendium of Sewage Treatment Technologies, National River Conservation Directorate Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India, August 2009
Submerged
High rate Activated
Fluidized Aerated Aeration Fixed Film Moving Bed Biofilm
Parameters BIOFOR Technology* Sludge BIOFOR-F
Bed (FAB)* (SAFF) Reactor**
Technology*
Technology*
Advantage a. Higher aeration efficiency a. Higher aeration a. Deep reactors a. Deep reactors a. Smaller footprint.
through co - current diffused efficiency through enabling small space enabling small b. Can be retrofitted to
aeration system. diffused and tapered requirements space requirements activated sludge systems
b. Able to withstand fluctuations aeration system. b. Elimination of the b. Ability to for increased capacity or
in flow rate and organic loads. b. Compliance with need for sludge effectively treat higher quality of
c. Compliance with stricter stricter discharge recirculation and dilute domestic effluent.
discharge standards. standards. monitoring of MLSS wastewaters c. Biomass recirculation
d. Effluent suitable for UV c. Stable digester in the reactor c. Low & stabilized not necessary.
disinfection without filtration. performance and c. Capacity to handle sludge production d. High effluent quality in
e. Absence of aerosol and odour consistent gas shock loads. eliminating the terms of BOD and
nuisance in the working area. production d. Low & stabilised need for sludge suspended solids.
f. Absence of corrosive gases in sludge production digestion
the area eliminating the need
for sludge digestion
Disadvantage a. Continuous and high None except high cost a. Reliance on a. Clogging of a. Increased power
chemical dosing in primary patented filter reactor due to requirements for
clarification. media. absence of primary aeration, therefore
b. Undigested sludge from b. Reliance on sedimentation. increased operational
primary clarification requiring flocculants, b. Reliance on costs.
post treatment polyelectrolyte and proprietary filter b. Higher cost of media.
chemical media c. Must maintain high
disinfectant. c. High reliance on oxygen concentration.
c. Requires skilled external energy d. Increased level of
manpower input pretreatment with fine
d. Requires skilled screening.
manpower e. Process sensitive to
sustained peak hour
flow.
Land
Requirement 0.04 ha/MLD 0.08 ha/MLD 0.06 ha/MLD 0.05 ha/MLD 0.05 ha/MLD
Submerged
High rate Activated
Fluidized Aerated Aeration Fixed Film Moving Bed Biofilm
Parameters BIOFOR Technology* Sludge BIOFOR-F
Bed (FAB)* (SAFF) Reactor**
Technology*
Technology*
Energy
Requirement 220-335 kWh/ML 180 kWh/ML 99-170 kWh/ML 390 kWh/ML -
Capital Cost
Rs. 6.5-8.1 million/MLD Rs. 5.2 million/MLD Rs. 3-5 million/MLD Rs. 7 million/MLD Rs. 2.1 million/MLD
O&M Cost
Rs. 0.18 Rs. 0.6-0.75 Rs. 1.14
Rs. 0.86 million/year/MLD Rs. 6 million/year/MLD
million/year/MLD million/year/MLD million/year/MLD
Source: * Compendium of Sewage Treatment Technologies, National River Conservation Directorate Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India, August 2009
ANNEX 12.1
NABET ACCREDITATION OF
GCPL
ANNEX 12.2
MOU BETWEEN GCPL &
EEPL
ANNEX 12.3
NABET ACCREDITATION OF
EEPL
Scheme for Accreditation of EIA Consultant Organizations
Scope of Accreditation
As per NABET Scheme Project or Activity as per
S. Schedule of MoEF
Consultant Organization
No. Sector Notification dated
Name of Sector Category
Number September 14, 2006 and
subsequent amendments
in view of their having scored less than 60% marks in
Office Assessment. They can take up projects in these
sectors only for Cat. B as an organization.
Conditions apply
Envirogreen Consultants (India) Pvt. Ltd *
Address: 1-B, Macchla Marg, New Patel Circle, Hiren

Magri, Udaipur- 313002
Email:egcipl@yahoo.co.in,
58 1 Mining of minerals - Open cast only B** 1 (a) (i)
Tel.:9352239829
** Though the EIA Coordinator for this sector was

found suitable for Cat. A, however, the organization as
a whole was accredited for Cat. B, in view of their
having scored less than 60% marks in Office
Assessment. They can take up projects in this sector
only for Cat. B as an organization.
Envirotech East Pvt. Ltd. (EEPL) Mineral beneficiation including

7 A 2 (b)
59 pelletisation
Address: Bengal Ambuja Coml. Complex, UN-F-13, 4 Thermal power plants A 1 (d)
List of Accredited Consultant Organizations (Alphabetically)/ Rev. 37 (A) Jan. 07, 2016) Page 47
*denotes Provisionally Accredited Consultants
S. Schedule of MoEF
1050/1, Survey Park, Kolkata -700075 Metallurgical industries ( ferrous &
8 non ferrous) - both primary & A 3(a)
e. mail: eeplkol@gmail.com secondary
eeplkol2@gmail.com 9 Cement plants A 3 (b)
10 Petroleum refining industry A 4 (a)
Tel. : 033-24188127/ 24188128 11 Coke oven plants A 4 (b)
09331026867 Petrochemical based processing
(processes other than cracking &
20 A 5 (e)
reformation and not covered under
the complexes)
Conditions apply Synthetic organic chemicals industry
(dyes & dye intermediates; bulk
drugs and intermediates
excludingdrug formulations;
21 B 5 (f)
synthetic rubbers; basic organic
chemicals, other synthetic organic
chemicals and chemical
intermediates)
22 Distilleries A 5 (g)
Pulp & paper industry excluding
manufacturing of paper from waste
24 A 5 (i)
paper and manufacture of paper
from ready pulp without bleaching
Ports, harbours, jetties, marine
33 A 7 (e)
terminals, break waters and dredging
38 Building and Construction Projects B 8 (a)
S. Schedule of MoEF
Townships and Area development
39 B 8 (b)
Projects
Mining of minerals including Open

1 B 1 (a) (i)
cast/ Underground mining
4 Thermal power plants B 1 (d)
Metallurgical industries (sec. metallurgy
8 B 3 (a)
only)
Envisafe Environmental Consultants * 9 Cement plants A 3 (b)
Synthetic organic chemicals industry
Address:3rd floor, Akash Ganga Complex, Near Parimal (dyes & dye intermediates; bulk
Railway Underpass, Beside Suvidha Shopping Center, drugs and intermediates
Paldi, Ahmedabad-380007. excludingdrug formulations;
21 A 5 (f)
synthetic rubbers; basic organic
60
chemicals, other synthetic organic
Email:envisafe@gmail.com, pushpinshah@gmail.com chemicals and chemical
intermediates)
Tel.: 9825125278,9328961241 Highways, Railways, transport
34 terminals, mass rapid transport B 7 (f)
Conditions apply systems
Building and large construction
projects including shopping malls,
38 multiplexes, commercial complexes, B 8 (a)
housing estates, hospitals,
institutions

18102019LAZI7NT4compresspdf huK8mO1o

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

18102019LAZI7NT4compresspdf huK8mO1o

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT

“FOR DONG FANG ELECTRIC (INDIA)

Sector : 8(A) Building and Construction projects

Signature & Date

Period of Involvement : August 2017 to January 2019

Functional Area Experts:

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT

Declaration by the Head of the Accredited Consultant Organization

Name : Nandini Choudhury

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

3.10.2 Hydrogeology 3-11

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

6.1 THE PLAN 6-1

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

13. ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL DAMAGE, REMEDIATION PLAN &

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

SI.No. Name of Tables Page No.

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

BASELINE ENVIRONMENT STATUS

 The NPK content was found to be good for growth of plants

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

Surface and Ground Water

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES

Impacts & Mitigation Measures during Operation phase:

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

 DG set shall be provided with acoustic enclosures and anti-vibrating pads.

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

 It does not require skilled man-power;

 No pre-treatment and no chemical usage;

ENVIRONMENT MONITORING PLAN

 To ensure that the environmental control systems are operating satisfactorily.

 To suggest ongoing improvements in management plan, if required, for subsequent effective

RISK ASSESSMENT & DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN

ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL DAMAGE, REMEDIATION PLAN AND

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

Sl. Project Events Date Application No./File No.

1.2 PROJECT PROPONENT

1.3 PROJECT LOCATION

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

1.4 NEED OF THE PROJECT

1.5 THE STUDY

1.5.1 The Process

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

1.5.2 Regulatory Compliance Requirement

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

1.6 STRUCTURE OF THE EIA REPORT

PROJECT PROPONENT ENVIRONMENT CONSULTANT PAGE

Chapter 9 - Environment Cost Benefit Analysis: The chapter comprehensively analyse