Solution and strategy (SAS)

We have been asking the wrong questions. From day 1.

The first question should’ve been: why do people go to restaurants?
Asking that is vital because we don’t want them to go anywhere right?
NO!
New solution!
I looked into it, and there are plenty of reasons people go to restaurants. And that isn’t too bad for us,
for a couple of reasons.
We can help small-exclusive or ‘normal’ restaurants expand their business!
All we need is a bit of land. Actually, we need nothing. The restaurant wants to expand, so they need
land.
But if they can get the land anyways where do we come in place?
Singapore airport terminal 4!
Who said a restaurant needs a human? If an airport can self-sustain, its a piece of cake for the
restaurant (pun intended). Like seriously. We could go up to a restaurant that is available for
renovation, and do it for them in a matter of days. (which we should try)
So when people order their food in that restaurant, it arrives from the other restaurant. But wait, this
seems futile.
NO!
If a restaurant needs no people, where will the food come from?
Kitchens.
But there is no person… Who’s cooking?
Wrong question! The kitchen isn’t in the restaurant, that’s absurd thinking. Who thought it would be a
good idea to cook and eat in the same building?
The kitchen would be a separate, dedicated building, with the sole purpose of cooking.
Now aren’t we wasting energy on transporting the food?
Not really, at least in the big picture, no. If the kitchen operates like a factory, they can produce much
more, bringing the costs back to equilibrium, plus they have more space, hence, greater capacity for
automation. All restaurants will essentially just be futuristic buildings with tables and chairs.
Why would a restaurant expand, and accept our ‘assistance’?
Because when a restaurant expands, they obviously won’t open up on every block, they want to cover
as much unique area as possible, and we want to shoot food as far as possible. This solves our range
issue, if you were confused with what I was going on about.
So that’s a long-term solution, which also seems enthusiastic, but ignore it for now, for I may unveil the
strategy.
A lot of people which eat in restaurants are actually corporate/office workers. We don’t have to focus
on ordinary consumers. This also solves the issues of catering to the needs of common people;
minimizing noise pollution, etc. And if offices comply, we can operate on top of sky scrapers! The
ecstasy of elegant solutions!

The reason I offer this idea on such short notice is to make sure it doesn’t collide or counteract your
new ideas, so you can consider this in your thinking. Plus I got some new ideas on automating a
restaurant (e.g. face recognition payments).
Also, what do you think about centrifugal launching? Like a ride which goes round and round, but once
you open the hatch, it goes off in a tangent.
All we need is a motor, and a handle/pulley to hold the container, and open the hatch at a very specific
time. MUCH simpler than coil gun, albeit more bland, and lacking sci-fi-hood.
Also, I cannot emphasize this enough, LANDING is the biggest issue by far, in fact, if we got a great
solution to landing, I’m ready to leave school and start now (won’t do it, I’m just saying that it is very
important).