Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DESCRIPTION OF COURSEWORK
2. All the assessment submitted must be the outcome of the student. Any form of academic
misconduct is a serious offense which will be penalised by being given a zero mark for the
entire assessment in question or part of the assessment in question. If there is more than one
guilty party as in the case of collusion, both you and your collusion partner(s) will be subjected
to the same penalty.
For this assessment, you are required to work individually. The assignment consists of a -
minimum 5 maximum 20 minutes long - video presentation on a specific aspect of international
communication (see the list below, F. Task). The presentation will make up for 50% of your
overall final grade for this course. The style is up to you: You can act as a news presenter, you
can choose to only use slides and audio, you can combine the two or you can come up with an
interesting alternative – as long as you get the main information across and follow the structure:
I. Introduction;
II. Main Body (the individual title of part II depends on the topic of your talk, for instance:
„Imagined Communities“);
III. Conclusion/Summary (what are the consewuences of this apoproach);
IV. Evaluation (which presents your own point of view).
Feel free to be as creative as possible: You are a student of advertising, not of the law! A
presentation does not need to be boring.
But be careful: Don’t go too wild. Focus! Make sure the creativity serves the main purpose of
getting the information across. For instance when it comes to the use of music. Don’t let it doodle
all the time in the background. Make sure one can still hear you talking. It is much more effective
to only have music now and then. Choose wisely which kind of music and why – in other words,
make sure it is motivated – maybe to accompany a visual sequence without any words? Etc. All
these things can be discussed via email or phone or in the live class sessions with the lecturer.
A handout (max. 2 pages!) that contains all the relevant information is an essential part of your
presentation. You will find a guideline on how to do a handout here:
https://speakingaboutpresenting.com/delivery/presentation-handouts/.
E. Evaluation Breakdown
No. Percentage
Component Title
(%)
1. Content (CLO 1, C2) 20
2. Delivery (no CLO) 20
3. Organization (CLO 1, C2) 20
4. Originality (no CLO) 20
5. Hand-out (CLO 1, C2) 20
TOTAL 100
Choose one of the following topics of international communication you would like to present on:
History of International Communication: Case Study (One Belt One Road Initiative,
China/US rivalry, Public Sphere in China, Corona virus, Myanmar etc.)
The lecturer will then assign you different texts on the topic you need to read carefully (make
notes!), then present on them (focus on the key aspects, CLO 1: comprehension), including your
personal evaluation at the end (Do you agree? Do you disagree? Why? What did you find
problematic/fruitful?).
Deadline:
.
Submission of your CLO 1 presentation video: Week 6, Monday 10th May 2021.
Submission:
Make sure to name the video file correctly: Student ID_Assignment CLO 1_Your
Name_Title of Presentation (example: JRN1902222_Assignment 1_Alicia Fang Jia
The handout (pdf-document only) consists of a filled-in official XMUM cover page, a
undersigned and dated own work declaration, the hand-out, and marking rubrics at the end.
The following tables explain the criteria for assessing the presentation in order to determine its
overall classification. (Assessed work often displays varied strengths and weaknesses: for instance
knowledge of content may be significantly stronger than the organization, or organization may be
stronger than the syntax. Teachers therefore evaluate the various aspects of each piece of work in
order to determine the most appropriate overall mark.)
Need Weight
Criteria Excellent Good Average Poor (%)
Marks
Improvement
(5) (4) (3) (1)
(2)
The presentation was Presenter focuses on side
Appropriate amount of Presenter focuses primarily informative but several aspects, wanders off the topic
Presenter says practically
material is prepared, and on relevant content and elements went unanswered. and is unable to summarize
Content (CLO nothing and focuses
points made reflect well their sticks to the topic. Presenter An overall view that the chapter. Presenter uses
primarily on irrelevant
1 C2) relative importance. adapts the content in a summarized the content was words and concepts which
content. Presenter appears to
20
Presenter adds individual general way to the listener missing. Much of the are inappropriate for the
ignore the listener and the
reserarch on era/artist and and the local situation. information irrelevant; knowledge and experiences
situation.
presents the chapter in his coverage of some of major of the listener (e.g., slang,
own words. points. jargon, technical language).
Introduction is attention-
getting, lays out the key
aspects well, and establishes
a framework for the rest of
the presentation.Information The message is organized. Command of ideas and
arguments: some reference The organization of the
is presented in a logical The listener has no difficulty
to topics raised by the message is mixed up and The message is so
sequence. The speaker helps understanding the sequence
Organization the listener understand the and relationships among the module but with limited random. The listener must disorganized you cannot
20
(CLO 1, C2) understanding of their make some assumptions understand most of the
sequence and relationships ideas in the message. The
significance; limited ability about the sequence and message.
of ideas by using ideas in the message can
to organise material or relationship of ideas.
organizational aids such as outlined easily.
announcing the topic, concepts; short and
previewing the organization, impoverished answers.
using transitions, and
summarizing.
TOTAL 100