Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/332398357
CITATIONS READS
6 413
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Tjandra Setiadi on 27 June 2019.
Email: efri.mardawati@unpad.ac.id*
Abstract
Xylitol is a natural sugar that has the sweetness level similar to sucrose, but has lower calorie. It
is an important sugar alternate for diabetics people. Reduction of xylose is a normally method to
produce the xylitol. It conducted through chemical hydrogenation of xylose at high pressures and
temperatures by reacting pure xylose with hydrogen gas using a metal catalyst. This process
requires pure xylose as the raw material. Alternatively, the reduction process can be carried out
through fermentation. This process does not require high purity of xylose as the raw material, and
thus the oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) hydrolysate, without any prior pretreatment, can be
used. In order to scale up the xylitol production by way of fermentation, kinetic study of xylitol
fermentation including growth and xylitol formation kinetic using the synthetic xylose as
substrate will be required. Data used in the kinetic model development were obtained from series
of batch fermentations of Debaryomycess hansenii ITB CCR85 varying the initial xylose and
glucose concentrations. Yeast growth could be sufficiently modeled using the Monod kinetics,
whereas xylitol production could be reasonably well modelled by Luedeking Piret kinetics.
1
Mardawati et al./JIITA Vol.1 Issue 1 (2017) 1-6
2
Mardawati et al./JIITA Vol.1 Issue 1 (2017) 1-6
Table 1. Summary of runs conducted in this 2.5.2 Xylitol Production for D. hansenii
research. ITBCCR85 Growth on xylose substrate
6 0 10 QP =
(P−P0 )
(5)
t
7 0 15 where:
8 0 20 P = xylitol product concentration (g/L)
T = Total fermentation time (hours)
2.5 Data Interpretation YP/S = Product-from-substrate yield (g
xylitol/g xylose)
2.5.1 Estimation of Growth Kinetics YP/X = product-from-cell yield ( g xylitol/g
Parameters cell)
Growth of microorganisms were QP = The volumetric productivity (g/L/h)
parameterised as the specific growth rate 2.5.3 Estimation of Product Formation
that was calculated from biomass Kinetic Parameter
concentration data during the logarithmic
phase, following equation 1. Product formation is commonly stated
dX
in its specific rate form. Definition for
= μX (1) specific product formation rate (qP) is
dt
expressed in Equation 6.
µ is referred as specific growth rate
1 dP
(1/hours), the µ value depends on substrate qP = (6)
X dt
concentration. Many models are used to
describe the relationship between µ and Generally, microbial products are classified
substrate concentration (denoted as S); into three categories (Shuler & Kargi,
however, the simplest model is formulated 2002), which are:
by Monod, as expressed in Equation 2 and a. Growth-associated product
The kinetics parameters were estimated For a growth-associated product,
using the Lineweaver-Burk plot in Shuler product formation rate is proportional
and Kargi [10]. to growth rate.
μmax .S
qp = αµ (7)
μ= (2) b. Non-growth-associated product
KS +S
For a non-growth-associated product,
where: product formation rate is unaffected by
X = cell concentration (g/L) growth rate.
t = fermentation time (h) qp = β (8)
µ = specific growth rate (h-1) Non-growth-associated products
S = substrate concentration (g/L) include secondary metabolites.
μmax = maximum specific growth rate (h-1) c. Mixed-growth-associated product
Ks = Monod constant (g/L) This product formation model is a
combination of growth-associated
product (Equation 7) and non-growth-
3
Mardawati et al./JIITA Vol.1 Issue 1 (2017) 1-6
4
Mardawati et al./JIITA Vol.1 Issue 1 (2017) 1-6
that D. hansenii ITBCCR85 has low affinity 3.2. Estimation of Xylitol Formation
to glucose, while its maximum growth rate
Kinetics Parameter
is even lower than C. mogii.
In general, the increase in xylose Xylitol production was observed from
concentration in the substrate resulted in fermentation of D. Hansenii on xylose,
an increase in the produced xylitol because glucose can not be converted to
concentration and xylitol yield (YP/S), except xylitol. In Table 3, the yield of xylitol from
for the run at initial xylose concentration of each experiments are presented.
15 g/L. In particular, the maximum product Similar phenomena was observed in
yield on substrate achieved is 0.310 g/g, literaters. Microbial production of xylitol
which corresponds to xylitol volumetric by D. Hansenii NRRL Y-7426 in Converti
productivity of 0.022 g/L/h. This value et.al [4], the result showed that at relatively
could still be improved because the xylose low starting xylose substrate concentration
utilization is still low (max = 58%). (S0 = 50 g/L), xylitol formation was very
The productivity volumetric,QP, slow (Y p/s = 0.24 g/g, QP = 0.058 g/L/h;
productivities as well as the product yield On the other hand, another initial xylose
on starting substrate, YP/S, were very low concentration range (90–125 g/L), YP/S was
under conditions of substrate of 7.5 g/L, rather high (0.82–0.83 g/g). This
therefore the yeast could have not taken phenomena in which constitutes a very
enough energy to grow and preferred to interesting result for a potential industrial
consume the carbon source for respiration development of this fermentation process.
and ATP production in Converti et.al [4]. It also stated that the rate of xylitol
The calculation of xylitol yield base on production increased similar with the
xylitol concentration per cell biomass (YP/X) increasing initial xylose in Dominguez et.al
has the same phenomena, that the increase [5]. Xylitol fermentation for the same strain
in xylose concentration resulted in the resulted yield of 0.79 g/g at initial xylose
increase xylitol yield (YP/X), which is the concentration 279 g/L. A high
maximum (YP/X) of 0.860 g xylitol/g cell. concentration of xylose (279 g/L) was
5
Mardawati et al./JIITA Vol.1 Issue 1 (2017) 1-6
14
Xylose (g/L)
4
-1
0 24 48 72 96
Fermentation time (h)
(a)
4 4
Biomass (g/L)
3 3
Xylitol (g/L)
2 2
1 1
0 0
0 24 48 72 96 0 24 48 72 96
Figure 2. The Profile of final substrate (a), xylitol product (b) and biomass (c) were
produced by D. hansenii for each substrate concentration. ( : 7.5 g/L; : 10
g/L; : 15 g/L; X : 20 g/L)
was started during the growth phase and that xylitol is produced both at the growth
the concentration reaches its maximum in and stationary phase, which agrees with the
the stationary phase. The calculation of observation. Validation of model was done
specific product formation rate (qP) at each with simulate this parameter to estimate
specific growth phase is presented in Table the xylitol production in the fermentations
4. time, further compared with the
experimental result ( Fig.3).
Table 4. Estimation of product formation
kinetics parameters.
CONCLUSIONS
Initial substrate
concentration 7.5 10 15 20 The results showed that glucose is
(g/L) significantly easier to consume than xylose
rp growth
0.0010 0.0030 0.0050 0.0090
during the fermentaion of D. hansenii
(g xylitol/L.h) ITBCCR85. The growth was observed to
rp stationer
follow Monod kinetics model, with
0.0090 0.0140 0.0210 0.0260 estimated parameters (KS and µmax)
(g xylitol/L.h)
subsequently 18.55 g/L and 0.27 hour-1 for
qp growth 0.0001 0.0003 0,0004 0.0009
( g xylitol/g X.h)
glucose, 4.6 gL-1 and 0.10 hour-1 for xylose.
Xylitol formation was categorized as mix
qp stationer
0.0041 0.0058 0.0081 0.0087
growth product, with product formation
( g xylitol/g X.h) kinetics estimated to be qp = 0.006µ +
β average 0.0070 0.007. The maximum xylitol yield obtained
in this work was 0,310 g/g which
α average 0.0060 corresponds to volumetric productivity of
xylitol of 0.022 g/L/h. These values were
The calculation showed that both obtained from experiment with initial
alpha and beta are non zero. This indicates xylose concentration of 20 g/L.
6
Mardawati et al./JIITA Vol.1 Issue 1 (2017) 1-6
mixgrowth simulation
Substrate 20 g/L
experiment data
3
Xylitol (g/L
2
1
0
0 24 48 72 96
Fermentation time (h)
Xylitol (g/L
2 2
1 1
0 0
0 24 48 72 96 0 24 48 72 96
Fermentation time (h) Fermentation time (h)
Figure 3. Xylitol products from experiment and model simulation on the fermentations
time for each initial xylose concentration
7
Mardawati et al./JIITA Vol.1 Issue 1 (2017) 1-6