Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FINAL PROJECT
TOPIC: DELAY CIRCUIT 4NS-IRC
2
Specifications Table
DEVICES WIDTH (um) LENGTH (um)
P1 10 5
P2 1.8 0.18
P3 1.8 0.18
P4 1.8 0.18
N1 0.18 0.18
N2* 8 5
N3* 7 4.5
N4 0.18 0.18
*N2, N3 acts as a capacitor to put delay to the circuit.
b. Schematic 2 (1 Cap)
Specifications Table
DEVICES WIDTH (um) LENGTH (um)
P1 10 5
P2 18 1.5
P3 1.8 0.36
P4 1.8 0.36
N1 0.36 0.36
N2* 8.22 8.22
N3 0.36 0.36
* N2 acts as a capacitor to put delay to the circuit.
3
III. IMPLEMENTATION AND SIMULATION RESULT
1. Implementation
- We have designed the project with Custom Design so it will have serveral task:
Schematic, Symbol, PreSimulation, Layout, Parameter Extraction, Post Layout
Simulation (for Schematic 1).
a. SCHEMATIC
- The idea is we will take the current bias (I) to control the precision control of
the delay time and create the delay circuit with current bias as input (in
testbench). The delay circuit looks like VRC which have 2 inverter acts as a
buffer but it has a capacitor (NMOS) to increase/decrease delay time.
Schematic 1
4
Schematic 2
b. PreSimulation
- At the first time, our team tried with the current 1uA (at 25 C degree) but the
result wave of output isn’t nice as we expect so we changed the current value
into 0.1nA (at 25 C degree) which has a better result.
5
- Despite of 2 testbenches below seem difference but they’re not, they’re the
same function and parameter
Schematic 1
Schematic 2
6
Hình 7 PreSimulation Delay IRC 4ns
7
Hình 9 Rise/Fall time Result at 25 C degree
8
Hình 12 PreSimulation Result Delay time at -10 C degree
9
Hình 14 PreSimulation Result (Delay:4ns) at 25 C degree
10
Hình 17 Rise/Fall time PreSimulation at 60 C degree
11
DELAY DEGREE ( C ) RISE/FALL TIME (ns)
4.01ns 25 1.49/1.16
4.66ns 60 1.95/2.35
3.69ns -10 1.25/0.88
*All the result on the table is the avarage result.
c. Layout
Schematic 1
Schematic 2
12
Hình 21 Layout of Delay IDC 4ns
d. Parameter Extration
- With Custom Design, we have 3 steps to comfirm our layout are correct:
• DRC (Design Rules Check): This step uses the DRC function to check
that the design conforms to the design rules are not.
• LVS (Layout Versus Schematic): This step checks if the layout is
properly designed with the design (schematic).
• LPE (Layout Parasitic Extraction): This step estimates and displays
the amounts of parasites on the circuit including capacitors and resistors.
- So Parameter Extraction is LPE step in Custom Design.
13
Schematic 1
Schematic 2
14
Hình 23 Parameter Extraction (1)
- It looks like layout but look closely we will see the circuit including capacitors
and resistors.
15
Hình 24 Parameter Extraction (2)
16
- Same with the PreSimution, we will simulation the post layout with 3
temperatures: -10, 25, 60 C degree.
Schematic 1
17
Hình 28 Post Layout Simulation Delay Result at 60 C degree
18
Hình 30 Post Layout Simulation Delay time at -10 C degree
19
Hình 32 Post Layout Simulation Delay time at 25 C degree
20
Hình 35 Rise/Fall time Post Layout at 60 C degree
21
DELAY DEGREE ( C ) RISE/FALL TIME (ns)
3.6ns 25 1.23/1.28
4.54ns 60 1.96/2.63
3.4ns -10 1.23/0.93
*All the result on the table is the avarage result.
COMPARE BETWEEN PRESIMULATION AND POST LAYOUT SIMULATION
a. Schematic 1:
PreSimulation
DELAY DEGREE ( C ) RISE/FALL TIME (ns)
4.03ns 25 1.6/0.924
4.85ns 60 2.35/2.85
3.64ns -10 1.4/0.806
Post layout simulation
DELAY DEGREE ( C ) RISE/FALL TIME (ns)
3.84ns 25 1.76/1.1
4.71ns 60 2.7/3.15
3.52ns -10 1.48/0.887
b. Schematic 2:
PreSimulation
DELAY DEGREE ( C ) RISE/FALL TIME (ns)
4.01ns 25 1.49/1.16
4.66ns 60 1.95/2.35
3.69ns -10 1.25/0.88
Post layout simulation
DELAY DEGREE ( C ) RISE/FALL TIME (ns)
3.6ns 25 1.23/1.28
4.54ns 60 1.96/2.63
3.4ns -10 1.23/0.93
c. Comment:
- In Schematic 2, Rise/Fall Time are quite stability in PreSimulation and in
PostLayout Simulation and the current bias wave is clearly than Schematic 1.
But Delay time in PostLayout not as expected, it just has 3.6ns/4ns (in
Schematic 1 is 3.84ns/4ns).
- Despite of 2 testbenches above seem difference but they’re not, they’re the
same function and parameter so it takes 2 results with 2 Schematic.
- In my conclusion, Schematic 2 is the best case for 4ns because it delays time
in PostLayout is acceptable with 3.84ns/4ns and the difference of Rise/Fall
time between two Schematic are not large.
22
IV. SUMMARY AND FUTURE RESEARCH/CONCLUSION
- After doing this project, I have gained the following experience:
• W/L of PMOS, NMOS make an important contribution in creating
delay timing in this circuit also the current bias (I) too.
• At previous project, we have done the VRC dealy circuit so this IRC
delayc circuit help us know more about delay circuit in general.
- We hope to have access to more designs to learn more.
-------------------------------------------The end----------------------------------------
23