THE

KENNEDY BOYS
AND
OUR
INVISIBLE
GOVERNMENT
- e-

By MYRON C. FAGAN
- e-

No. 90
 "CFR" IS OUR INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT
- - -e - - -
In this issue we pi ck up wh ere we left off in our "Ne ws-Bulletin,"
No. 88, issued in Februar y, 1962.
In that issue we provided a compreh ensiv e picture of th e back-
grou nd of th e "Council on Foreign Relations." W e clearl y establish-
ed th at th is sinister outfit is th e special Cab al set up by th e Master-
minds of th e Intern ationalists-Communist Conspiracy to m anipulat e
the political machin ery th at operates th e "Invisible Governm ent."
We depi cted th e methods th e CF R employ to control th e nomin a-
tions, by both Parties, of all th e cand ida tes for th e Pr esiden cy and
Vice Presidency - how th ey ap point all members of th e Cabinets,
th e Secretari es, Assista nt Secretaries, Under Secretaries, head s of
all of our F ederal Agencies - and how th ey infiltrat e th eir tools
into both Houses of Congress.
One of th e amazi ng fea tures about this Machiavellian Ca ba l is
that although it has been functioning since World War On e th e vast
majorit y of th e America n peopl e have been totally un aware of its
existence . Even today, despite all of th e recent publicity, very few
peo ple are consciously awa re of its existence - and most of th ose
few are only vag uely aware of its objectives.
But perh ap s th e most amaz ing feature of th e CFR's methods is
th at th ey are so incredibly simple, yet, so fri ghteningly suc cessful,
th at all importa nt decisions of th e White House, th e State Dep art-
ment , the CIA , th e Pentagon, all F ed eral Agencies are DICTATED
by the CFR - eq ua lly amazing is th e fact th at onl y a few , a very
few, of even our most astute political analysts are awa re of it.
All th at is du e to just one thing: th e rigid self-effaceme nt th e out-
fit has successfully mainta ined through all th e years! It was set up
to do just one job: crea te a pool of th e "tools" necessary to man th e
"Invisible Government" - to "cond ition" every individual in th at
"pool" into a complete accepta nce of "ours not to reason w hy, ours
but to do or die" as his creed . . . and to accomplish th at so qui etl y
th at nobody outside of th e Hi erarchy would be aware of it. Th ey
( the CFR ) developed a perfect techni que to accomplish it; to wit:
As established in "News-Bulletin" No. 88, whe n th e CFR was
organized it was, to all outward app earances, nothing mor e nor less
th an an exclusive "Club," with a limited membership of 1,000 care-
full y selected men . Fi ve hundred of th at ori ginal th ousan d were
so-called "resident members," meaning th at th ey we re "off icially,"
(but not necessarily) "resident" within 50 miles of th e CFR head -
qua rters in New York. The othe r 500 were thos e whose pr ofessions
-1-
and businesses required them to live in other parts of th e country-
and they were known as "non-resident members." During th e year s
that followed th ey (the CFR) found it nec essary, or desirable, to in-
crease the membership to 1,500, th eir present full membership. But,
significantly, the percentages of "resident" and "non-reside nt" mem-
bers have always been kept th e sam e : half "reside nt" - half "non-
resident." Following is the reason for it:
The original block of 500 "resident" members was composed of
th e Top Brass of th e "Inte rnationalists-Communist (One-World)
Conspiracy" (ICC) , such as Baruch, Lehman, th e Warburgs, Schiffs ,
Rock efellers, etc., and th eir most trusted Li eutenants. In oth er
words, the principal "resident" members ar e th e "Hierarchy" of
both CFR and ICC, plus th eir working staffs - th ey formulate all
strategies and make all th e decisions. Also, all individuals proposed
for "non-resident" membership mu st be approved and passed b y th e
Executives (the Hierarchy ) in th e "Reside nt" group. .-'
The 500 "non-resident" (now approximat ely 750 ) members have
no voice in th e d elib erations of th e "reside nt" group - th ey have
no voice in th e decisions. Actually, in th e main, th ey compose th e
"pool" from which th e "Masterminds" ( H iera rchy) choose th eir
"tools" for th e various high offices in their "invisible government"
in Washin gton. But, pending such assignm ents, th e "non-resident"
members perform another very vital chore for th e CFR, to wit:
Every year th er e are newcomers in th e political field s all over
th e country. It is vitally important for th e CFR to know all about
such newcomers . The "non-reside nt" members , strat egically located
in all communities, serv e as th e obs erv ers , or "talent scouts" for th e
CFR. They compile dossi ers on all political newcomer s in th eir com-
munities - particularly on thos e who show promise of becomin g
Pr esid ential timber, or who exhibit tal ents for vari ous official spots
in Fed eral Gov ernment Agenci es. Ev ery dossier scru pulously lists
th e str engths and weaknesses, th e amb itions and th e susceptib ilities
of th e "newcome r" it covers . After car eful appraisal by th e CFR
membership committee (the Hierarchy ), th e most promising of th e
newcomers ar e "invited" to "non-reside nt" member ship - but th e
"invitation" alwa ys carries with it an "or else" ultimatum . . . th e
"or else" meaning: "yours not to reason why, yours but to obey or
die." . . . th e "die" meaning political obli vion. W e have seen how it
worked with Rich ard Nixon.
Now, on e may well wonder how such a small group of men can
intimidate and enslave men of great political stature . . . one also
may wonder how this small group can control th e thinking of th e
vast majority of th e Ameri can people to such a degr ee that CFR
-2-
displeasure can mean politi cal death for topmost political figur es -
as it did (to all int ents and purposes) for Bob Taft , for Bill Jenn er,
for Joe McCarthy, for Bill Knowland, for Martin Di es, for many
others. W ell, just a glan ce at th e nam es of th e CFR members quick-
ly reveals th e sour ces of its powers.
- - -e - --

JUST A FEW CFR ASSASSINS

- -- e -- -

At this point I will name only th ose in th e Mass Communicati ons

Media , I will nam e th em alpha be t ically rather th an in th e order of
th eir importa nce.
Herbert Agar, Editor, Louisville Courier-Journal .. . Hanson W. Baldwin,
Military Affairs Editor, New York Times Joseph Barnes (Ike's pal), Editor-
in-Chief, Simon & Schuster, Publishers William Benton, Publisher, En-
cyclopedia Brittanica . . . Je hn Mason Brown, Editor, Saturday Review of
Literature . . . Cass Ca'nfield, Chairman of Editorial Board of Harper &
Brothers, Publishers . .. Erwin Canham and Joseph C. Harsch, The Christian
Science Monitor . . . Marquis Childs, syndicated Columnist . . . Norman
Cous ins , Editor-in-Chief, Saturday Review of Literature . . . Gardner and
John Cowles (Brothers), owners of Cowles Magazine Co., publishers of
LOOK, Minneapolis Star & Tribune and Des Moines Register and Tribune -
they also own a chain of Broadcasting Stations Mark Ethridge, Publisher,
Louisville Courier-Journal and Louisville Times Philip Graham, Publisher,
Washington Post & Times Herald . . . Allen Grover, Vice President of TIME,
Inc. . . . August Hecks cher, Editor, New York Herald-Tribune . . . Palmer
Hoyt, Publisher, Denver Post . . . ERIC JOHNSTON, Czar of Hollywood . . .
David Lawrence, Editor-in-Chief, U. S. News & World Report . . . Hal Lehr-
man, Editor, New York Post . . . Irving Levine , NBC News-Editor and Com-
mentator . .. Walter Lippman, Syndicated Columnist Henry R. Luce,
Publisher, LIFE, TIME, FORTUNE, SPORTS ILLUSTRATED Malcolm Muir,
Editor-in-Chief and Board Chairman, NEWSWEEK . . . Edward R. Murrow,
now Chief of USIA William S. Paley, Chairman of Board, Columbia
Broadcasting System Ogden and Whitelaw Reid (formerly) respectively
Chairman of Board and Editor-in-Chief, New York Herald Tribune ... James
B. Reston, Editorial Writer (Syndicated) New York Times . . . David Sarnoff,
Chairman of the Board, Radio Corporation of America (also NBC, RCA
VICTOR, etc .) . . . Harry Scherman, Founder and Board Chairman of Book-
of-the-month Club . . . William L. Shirer, Author, Radio News Commenta-
tor . .. Paul Smith, President-Editor-in-Chief, Crowell Publishing Company.
. . . Leland Stone, head of News Reporting for RADIO FREE EUROPE and
Chicago Daily News foreign correspondent . . . Robert K. Strauss, formerly
head of FDR's "Council of Economic Advisers" - now owner of a string of

-3-
small newspapers and magazines in California, and publisher of Trade
magazines ••. Arthur Hayes Sulzberger, Publisher, New York Times . . .
C. L. Sulzberger (Syndicated), Editorial Writer, New York Times .. •

Th ere are ma ny more CFR memb ers and stooges in our Mass
Communicati ons Medi a, such as th e Eric Severeids, th e Alsops,
Howard K. Smiths, Herbert Matt hews, Chet Huntleys, Brinkleys,
etc ., etc . - far too man y to be nam ed in our limited space. How-
ever, it is imp ortant to mention th at insofar as th e Pr ess is concern -
ed every one of our Wire Services (A P, UP/ , etc.) is LO ADED with
CFR members and stooges . As for "Hollywood," I stressed on man y
occa sions th at every Major Lot and Di stributing organiza tion in
th e Film Industr y is absolut ely controlled by th e Lehm an -Warburg-
Goldm an-Sachs clique of Internati onalist Bank ers (the Hierarchy of
th e ICC-CFR)-also th at ALL Nation al TV and Rad io Network s
are similarly controlled by thi s same cliqu e.
Thus you can readily understand how and why th e American
peopl e have been (and are being) deceived , deluded an d br ain -
washed ever since CFR came into bein g .. . you can see wh y every
political opportu nist, ran gin g from th e F D Rs, Eisenhowers, Ken-
ned ys, Nixons, down to th e pr ecinct levels, zea lously fulfills th e
d ictat es of th e Masterminds (CF R) of th e Great Conspirac y. Thus
you can see th at our only hope for th e salvation of our Country lies
in our Congress - but it MUST be a Congress th at is LOYAL to
th e American people and our Constitution - a Con gress th at will
not hesit at e to put on tri al, via impeachment proceedings, all th e top
betrayers, wh ether th ey be Eisenhowers, Earl Warre ns, or Ken-
ned ys ... but w e will only get such a Congress if a fully AWA K-
ENED Ame rican people w ill rigidly SCR EE N every man th ey send
to W ashington!
And now, for th e benefit of th e still doubting ones, I mu st aga in
STRESS that (anyw ay, un til now ) virtua lly 99 percent of th e Ame r-
ican peopl e are not even awa re of th e existence of th e "Council on
Foreign Relations." Even more imp ortant, insofa r as th e infinitesima l
fraction of th e peopl e wh o are aw are of its existence are conce rne d,
th e CFR is a non -partisan , non-politi cal, public-spirit ed organiz a-
tion (Club), set up to render a public service for th e American peo-
ple - and to advise and guide our government in its Foreign Rela-
tion s policies. In short, on th e surface, it is a purely benevolent out-
fit . And , until now, it has successfully kept its true nature com-
plet ely cam ouflaged.
But, of course, th ere wa s (and is) a lot of educa tional (d irty ) work
to be done to "condition" th e American peopl e to acce pt th e CFR's
"be nevolent guidance" in our F oreign affairs . .. ditto to "educate"
-4-
th e peopl e to accept th e "UNITED NATIONS" (th e housing for
th e One-World Governm ent ) as th e world's only hope for everlast-
ing PEACE ... ditto to "brainw ash" all American parents into ac-
cepting UNESCO as th e overlord of our Educational Systems. There
were (and still are) many similar "educational" processes necessary
to delud e and lur e th e American peopl e into accepting the plann ed
"One-World" enslavement. Th e CFR could not directly engage in
any of th ose pr ocesses without a grave risk of losing its "hush-hush"
umbrella. Th erefore, th e "Masterminds" set up sepa rate and distinct
"Fronts" for each of th e various "educational processes." All th e
"Fronts" are, on th e surface, completely ind ep endent of each oth er .
And, of cours e, th e CFR blandly denies all connections and/or af-
filiat ions with any of th em . Thus th e Masterminds hoped (still hop e)
th at wh en and if anyone of th e "F ronts" is unmasked , as, for ex-
ample, UN ESCO has been unmasked, th e dirty work of th at "Front"
could not be traced to th e CFR.
Thus, th e unm asking of th e "Council on Foreign Relations" would
not be complete without a th orough explora tion of its various
"Fronts."
- -- e - - -

"FRONTS" ARE THE HEADS OF THE "HYDRA"

- - -e - - -

Perh aps th e most viciou s and dangerous of th ese "Fronts" is th e

one th at operat es under th e name of "TH E FOREIGN POLICY
ASSOCIATION" (FPA ), form erly known as th e "League of Free
Nat ions Association."
As a matter of record , th e FPA wa s founded in 1921, and in-
corporat ed under th e laws of th e State of New York in November,
1928. But , actua lly, it stems from a meeting of writers and educa-
tors at Columbia Univ ersity, New York City, in April , 1918.
Th e chief key figur es at that meeting, to nam e just a few , were
Heywood Broun , W alt er Lippman , Quentin Reynolds, Jack London,
Nich olas Murray Butler , th en head of Columbia, Dr. Georg e
Counts and John Dewey. The proclaim ed reason for th e meeting
was to determ ine wh at role th e United States would play in world
affairs after World W ar One. But th e real objective was an organiz-
ed camp aign to repl ace "readin' and writin' and 'rithmatic" in our
schools with th e "progressive education" scheme - which was to
be th e sprin gboard for th e UNESCO tak e-over of our educational
systems.
- --e- - -

-5-
 NOTE: The entire horrifying UNESCO plot is revealed in our "News-
Bulletin," No. 86, entitled: "UNESCO: NO. 1 ENEMY of
AMERICAN YOUTH." Ed.

- - - e - --

Of course, that "Progressive Education - UNESCO" schem e was

predicated on th e expe ctation of a suc cessful launching of th e
"L eague of Nations" - which, at th e tim e of that fir st (191 8 ) meet-
ing, was con sider ed "in th e bag." But wh en th e American p eople
repudiated the "League," th e Mast erminds of th e Conspiracy found
th ey'd have to revise th e entire plot - start from scra tch all over
again, as it were.
Their fir st ste p was th e setti ng up of th e "Council on Foreign
Relation s," which , to all intents and purposes, has since become th e
active "INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT" of th e United Stat es ... th e
second ste p was th e "Foreign Policy Association."
As we know, th e on th e surface fun cti on of th e CF R wa s to
"adv ise and guide" our governme nt in its Foreign Relations poli cies.
The function of th e FPA was to organi ze an d operate th e "brain-
washing" machiner y th at was to keep th e American peopl e un aw ar e
of the plottings th at wer e to gradua lly transform th e United Stat es
into an enslaved unit of an Internati onalist-Commun ist On e-W orld
Government.
Unlike th e CFR, th e FPA never attempted to op er at e as a "hush-
hu sh" organizati on. On th e th eor y th at a d aring offen se makes a
p erfect defen se, th e FPA boldly proclaimed its (sup posed) objec-
tiv e, to wit : The FPA cam e into existence more than 40 years ago,
at a tim e when we h ad no radi o or TV to serve as mass commu-
nic ationsmedi a, and wh en (so FPA conte nded) our Press paid very
little attention to world affair s. H ence, th e founder s of FPA p ro-
cla imed th at th er e was need for an organi zation whi ch would spe -
cialize in th e study of world affai rs an d Ame rican foreign polic y,
and which would make th e "carefully analyzed" inform ati on ava il-
abl e to the Ameri can people throu gh lectures and printed publica-
tions.
According to its brochures, th e FPA is a non-profit organizat ion
(financed by various FOU NDATIONS ) set up to carryon research
and educationa l activiti es to aid in th e understanding and construc-
tive development of American for eign policy. Its By-Laws more
specifically "explain" th e purposes of th e org anization, to wit:
"To promote community organizati ons for world education . . .
to provide assistanc e to local organizati ons throu gh a national serv-
-6-
ice center . . . to advance public understanding of foreign policy
problems through national programs and publications of a non-par-
tisan character, based up on th e principles of freed om, justice - and
DEMOCRACY." Th e By-Law s further specifically stip ulate th at
th e orga nization would merely assemble and disseminat e F ACTS ,
whil e remainin g neutral in matters of controversial nature - and
would at all times carefully refra in from ope ra ting as a "pressure
group" in any way.
So far, all th at sounds very good . . . . but a more care-
ful analysis reveals th at th e main purpose of th e FPA is to
"prevent 'imperialsim' and 'nationalism' from sweeping America and the
world" .. . and th at tells th e RE AL story! ! !
Immed iat ely after F PA becam e a "going concern" it launched its
"GREAT D ECI SIO NS" so-called "educational" pr oject . . . the "edu-
cation" in th e "GREAT D ECISIO NS" subtly advocates Int ernation-
alism , One-W orldism , and all that goes with that philosophy.
Simultaneously, th ey began to set up FPA b ran ches in various
cities and communities th rou ghout th e nation. As far back as 1954
th ey had set up 600 College Intern ati onal Relations Clubs. This, in
addition to FPA cha p ters, or Bran ches, in more th an 1,000 com-
mun ities.
In th e mid-1950s th e FPA enlarged and tr an sform ed many of th e
"branches" in th e lar ger communit ies into wh at th ey called "W orld
Affairs Centers." Th e enlarg emen ts were accomplishe d throu gh
mergers of th e FP A "branches" with other groups working in th e
same dir ection on matters of foreign policy, resear ch and pr omotion,
the FP A providing th e "research" mat erial and lectures, and general-
ly serv ing as th e "brains" of th e new organi zations.
Among th e groups th at th us becam e closely affiliated with th e
"\Vorld Affairs Cent ers" were th e "Am erican Association For Th e
United Nations," th e "United W orld Fed eralists," UNESCO, "SANE"
and similar groups working toward ultimat e On e-World govern -
ment through th e UN IT ED NATIONS! Thus today, with th e FPA
masterminding th eir activiti es, th e "Wo rld Affairs Centers" are ac-
tively pr omotin g such tr easonous pr ojects as "United Nations W eek ,"
UNICEF greeting (Christmas) card sales and Halloween "T rick
or Treat" collections, etc., etc. Th ey also fun ction as pr essure groups
for "Fo reign Aid," Summit Meetings, Cultural Exchange, "Ban Th e
Nuclear Tests" and Desegregation campa igns, etc., etc. Th ey also
serve as th e "we lcom ing comm itt ees" and ho sts for th e visiting Krem-
lin "dignitaries" such as Mikoyan , Koslov, Khrushchev, etc . All of
us can sure ly remember how th ey rolled out th e red carpets for
all th ose Red Butchers.
-7-
 One of the FPA 's most important activities is th e setting-up of
th eir "GREAT DECISIONS" programs on TV and otherwise, under
the auspices of the various "World Affairs Centers," also local
"GREAT DECISIONS workshops" and "group discussions," "W orld
Affairs" luncheons and Church "stud y groups," as well as "study
groups" in P-TAs, Women's Clubs and oth er civic organizations. In
addition, th ey sponsor adult "evening classes" for foreign study
and/or "family evenings" which include "suppers," ente rtainment,
and dances for fund raising purposes, etc., despite th e fact that they
get all th e financing th ey need from th e tax-fr ee Foundations.
Here I wish to stress one point: There are many well-meaning,
but naive, civic and religious groups and good-intentioned indivi-
duals joining in th e activities of th e FPA and "W orld Affairs Cen-
ters." For th e most part th ese groups and individuals are not aware
of the past records of th e leaders, nor of th e authors of text books
and published material pr escribed for th e "GREAT DECISIONS"
programs, but are deluded into lending th eir names to all thos e
organizations by assurances that all of th e obj ectives are "humani-
tarian." That is th e technique all Red Fronts have alw ays employed
to provide th eir organizations with "respectability." Tragically for
our country, that technique is quite successful, and th ere are many
otherwise loyal Americans actively participating in th ese treasonous
activities - or, at least, lending th eir nam es to th em.
In th e past that has brought considerable unh appiness for such
collaborators, both th e unwitting and th e witting ones. When th e
"Front" becomes exposed, th e collaborators become branded by th e
same expose. Th ey imm edi at ely scream to high Heav en that th ey
were "innocent dup es" - that was th e alibi of all th e Hollywood
Reds aft er th ey were caught in th e "dragnet." But careful checking
revealed that the perc entage of truly "innocent dupes" in th e Holly-
wood Red Fronts was almost nil. However, th e perc entages of
duped ones in such organizations as "Ame rican Assn. for th e United
Nations," the UWF, th e "Christian and Jewi sh Brotherhood" are
consid erable. But they have nobody but th emselves to blame - all
loyal Americans should car efully check th e nature of th e organiza-
tions th ey ar e solicited to support.
Now let's go to th e FPA official publications. Th e FPA issues
three basic publications. They are titled : "Intercom" ... "He adline
Series" ... "Foreign Policy Bulletin ." Th e "Intercom" is a monthly
pamphlet, published nine tim es per year and serv es basically as a
so-called information service on world affairs, materials, speakers,
programs, etc. The "H eadline Series" is issued six tim es a year and
is a booklet on key foreign policy issues and subj ect s. The "Foreign
Policy Bull etin" is published semi-monthly and "analyzes" foreign
-8-
affairs and current issues in th e news. Of the th ree pu blica tions,
none is mor e viciously potent than the "Foreign Policy Bulletin" in
anesth etizing th e public consci enc e and consciousness to the evil
and danger of Communism . . . it constan tly "brainwashes" the
American people into accep ting Recognition of Red China - and
One-World Gov ernm ent through the UN ITE D NATIONS!
Now let's tak e a look at th e guiding gen ius of the FPA's "re-
search department," the source of all the ma terial in the "GREAT
DECISIONS" and all the propaganda spewed by the "World Af-
fairs Cent ers" and their affiliated "Fronts."
Her nam e is Vera Mich eles Dean. She is Russian-born , and she
has been the "guiding genius" of th e FPA ever since 1928. Employ-
ing a lot of complicated pseudo-intellectual phraseology , she has
don e a great deal of writing and has also given innumerabl e "lec-
tures." Fr equently, alerted Americans in her audience b reak into
her lectur es with vehem ent protests against her insertions of sly pro-
Communist propaganda in solid chunks of oth erwise pa latable and
non-obj ectionable statements ... the same thing has happened in
her lectures befor e University students,
Nevertheless, this Dean female is a fiendishly clever woman. She
has a tru ly remarkab le techniq ue for pu tt ing her "messages" across.
It is best described by one magazine ed itor, who is on the FPA
mailin g list:
"This woman sug ar-coats all he r 'messages' ve ry neatly," said this Editor .
"Every Soviet atroci ty, e ve ry Communist act of uHer ly indefendible ag-
gression, subversion, or terror is ne atly pla yed down, philosophized away
in double talk, and fin ally equated with non-analogous alleged moral lapses
on the part of the United States in the past, even if she has to go back a
hundred years to find a match ing example."

An article in th e November , 1946, issue of "Plain Talk" summed

up her balefu l influ enc e as follows :
" Unde r the present leadership of Ve ra Micheles Dean , the FPA's Research
Depa rtment is a factory fo r propaganda to appease the Soviet Union and to
apo logize and provide valid reasons for its expansion in all directions. The
Department's output reveals the double standard of political judgment that
is the mark of fellow travelism at its most effective level,"

In her latest book, "Building of Emerging Nations," she cites

Castro, Khrushchev, Mao Tse-tung, Ti to, Kwame Nkruma, Nasser,
Nehru and Sukarno as th e grea test and most h umane of all the
"builde rs." She lavished lyrical praise upon Tito, emphasizing that
he "p layed a major role" in bu ilding the so-called "third force of
-9-
uncommitted nations" . . . but nowhere do es that book report Ti to's
support of all major fore ign polici es of th e Soviet bloc, including
votes in th e "United Nations" for Castro . . . All that only scratches
th e surface of th e Dean woman's crafty propaganda for Communism
and One-W orldism.
In the "Foreign Policy Bull etin ," La D ean shrilly and continuously
spouts an FPA policy that hews closely to th e Moscow line , to wit:
Russia is the moral and ethical equal of the United States; Russia ha s sur -
passed the United States in military power and can destroy us; salvation
of the wo rld depends on increase d U. S. foreign aid, which (naturally) MUST
be funnelled throug h the UNITED NATIONS; Communism is merely a phase
of the 20th Century 'ind ustria l evolution" and is bound to disappear; West
Germany must be disarmed; anti-Commu nist d ictators must be deposed;
Red China must be admitted to the UNITED NATIONS and recognized by the
U. S., etc ., etc. By contrast, the FPA publications seldom mention an y of the
Communist at rocities - but when they do, they provide some fo rm of
pious justification for them.

The ed itorial staffs and regular contributors of the FPA publi-

cations are composed of such notorious pro-Communists and One-
Worlders as Arthur Schlesinger, Chester Bowles, Jam es P. Warburg,
Joseph Harsch, Herbert Matthews, Edwin Reischauer (now Am-
bassador to Japan), Henry Steel Comm ager, Ernest Gross, John K.
Fa irbank, Cyrus Ea ton, etc., etc.
This phase of our story would not be complete without a few
words about th e Dean woman's background. As pr evious ly not ed,
she is Russian-born. She denies that she is, or ever was, a memb er of
th e Communist Party - as if that in itself is important, becaus e by
all her words and deeds she is as dedicated to Communism as
Castro. The "House Committee on Un-American Activities" (HU-
AC) has documented her long record of subversive affiliations and
activities, and the Communist Fronts to which she belonged are
posted on the U. S. Attorney General's lists. Also, she was one of
th e guiding spirits in the setting up of "The Congress of Am erican
Wom en," a Communist Front so rampant that HUAC devoted a
114-page book to it ... and thi s is th e woman who is th e Editorial
mastermind of all the FP A publications! ! !
- - -e- - -

AMERICAN ASS'N. FOR THE UNITED NATIONS

- - -e - - -

Fo r a number of years, from ear ly in 1945 to 1950, this outfi t

(AA UN) was unquestionably the most dangerous and most ef-
-10-
fective of all th e CFR-FPA "Fronts." During th ose years it also had
an aura of respectab ility never achieved by any oth er of th e
"Fronts." It sucked in, as members and fin anc ial supporters, MANY
of our fin est people. Of course, th at was th e period in wh ich th e
UN was genera lly acce pted as a Hol y of Holi es.
The AAUN came into being simultan eou sly with th e ill-omened
birth of th e UN itself. The founder , and still head , was one Clark
Eichelberger, one of th e CFR's most hi ghly prized memb ers
(natch!) and a smooth and sanctimonious One-World "humanitar-
ian."
Employing th e technique th at serve d th e FPA so well, th e AAUN
immediately laun ched a campaign to set up AAUN branches, or
chapters, all over th e country. Within a year th ere was a flouri sh-
ing AAUN chapter in every community, large and sma ll, in th e
United States. And , still employing th e same techni qu e, th ey set
up "Study Groups" in W omen's Clubs, P-T As, Civi c groups of all
types - th ey held Seminars - th ey provid ed Speakers for all
occasions, etc., etc.
Naturally, th ey had th e full co-operation of all th e FPA and oth er
CFR Fronts. In many cases, th e Directorat es of th e FPA Bran ches
and th e AAUN Ch apters were int erlocked. Also naturally , th e AA-
UN co-operated with all th e othe r CFR "Fronts" - and th at was
wha t finally unm asked th em, to wit :
In 1949, we ( CE G) launched a campaign to forc e th e California
Legislature to rescind th e "United World Federalists" (UWF )
treasonou s "Resolution" (more about thi s later). Th e UWF fou ght
back frenziedl y - th ey launched viciously vitupe rative attacks on
me, on CEG, on th en Senator Jack B. T enn ey, on everybody who
worked for th e rescission. All of th e various CFR and FPA "Fronts"
came rushin g to th e support of th e UWF - but none so frantically
as the AAUN. Th e Los Ange les "Chapter" led all th e oth ers. I
pro mptly began a resear ch of th e backgrounds of th e officers of th at
'Chapter." Th at research develop ed th at th e Pr esident of th e Los
Ange les Chapter, Mary Workman, and various officers, were mem-
bers of th e Communist Part y and / or various Hollywood Red Fronts.
I confronted th em with my (documentary) evide nce at one of th eir
Seminars (on behalf of UWF ) at th e Santa Monic a W omen's Club.
Naturally, it startled th e audience . It stunned th e cha rged AAUN
officers - th ey had no defense. Within tw enty-four hours tho se
officers "resigned" - and th e Ch apter elected a new set of officers.
Th at story spr ead to all parts of th e nation. It definitely estab-
lished the pr o-Communist compl exion of th e AAUN.
- - -e- - -

-II-
 Before I conclude this phase, I wish to alert you to one other
crafty "gimmick" (th e POLL racket ) the CFR has been employing
with amazing effe ctiveness to delude the people:
During th e past 30 odd years th e American peopl e have been
"conditioned" to accept th e "Gallup Poll" as an infallible barometer
of all moods and trends in our nation. During national elect ion cam-
paigns, th e Gallup Poll "informs" us which candidate is in greatest
favor with th e voters - fr equently, it functions similarly on be-
half of CFR-favored gubernatorial and Con gressional aspirants.
After the UN was exposed as our betrayer in th e Korean W ar, the
Gallup Poll rushed to th e rescue (of th e UN ) with a "poll" which
"informed" us that th e vast majority of th e American peopl e just
LOVE th e UN - wh en th e UN's Kat an ga atrocities were unmasked ,
a Gallup Poll "informe d" us that a vast percentage of our peopl e have
supreme faith in th e UN as th e only instrument to maintain PEACE
in th e world . . . during th e Ei senhower Administration, after every
one of his disastrous ( so-called) "mistakes," a Gallup Poll cam e forth
to "inform" us of th e vast popularity of th at phony "Military Genius"
... today, despite the murderous (and delib erate) betrayal of th e
Cuban inv ad ers ; despite his vicious arrogance in th e Steel crisis;
despite th e naked evidence of his ruthless grabbing for powers
never intended by our Constitution for an y Chi ef Executive, the
Gallup Poll constantly "informs" us of th e vastl y growing popularity
of would-be Dictator Kenn edy.
That is how th e Gallup Poll "reports" on every individual and
every obj ective favored by th e CFR. But let th e subj ect be a Joe
McCarthy, a John Birch Society, a General W alker , or an y loyal
("Extremist") American, and th e Gallup Poll "percenta ges" prompt-
ly go into reverse.
A natural question ari ses: why? The answer is very simple-
and significant: George Gallup, sole own er of th e "GALLUP POLL,"
and Presid ent of th e "National Municipal League," is one of th e
"Council on Foreign Relation s" choicest Members! ! !
Now, th e important qu estion is : how does th e "Gallup Poll" ar-
rive at its "p ercenta ges?" Th e answer is very simple.
For a national poll th e Gallup "reporters" int ervi ew approximate-
ly 1,000 peopl e across th e nation. And that is the most ridiculous
feature of th e whole "Poll" gam e - I am sur e that no clear-think-
ing person could believe that th e "answ ers" of 1,000 peopl e, even
if hon estly arrived at, could possibly be an infallible barometer of
th e thinking of the entire 180 million American men and women . ..
But now let's go a step further : As we know, throughout th e nation
-12-
there are pock ets of peopl e who consider th e UNITED NATIONS
a "holy of holies." Similarly, th ere are pockets of Kennedy support-
ers - ditto Eisenhower worshippers, etc., etc. Naturally, th e Gallup
organization is fully aware of it - th ey know just where those
"pockets" are. Thus, when they ne ed a "poll" to show that a great
majority of th e American people LOVE th e UN , th ere is nothing
to pr event th e Gallup reporters from conc entrating on the known
UN-lovers until th ey have accumulated 50 or 60 percent "right"
answ ers. In addition, among th e other 40 to 50 perc ent "polled,"
th ere are bound to be some additional individuals who favor the
UN; some who are d efinitely "oppos ed;" some who are "undecid ed ."
Thus, if th e percentages releas ed b y Gallup were to run, say, 80
percent for th e UN - 8 perc ent opposed - 12 percent undecided ,
th e percentages would be statistically correct - but th e methods
employed to compile th e statistics completely belie th e true be-
liefs of th e peopl e as a whole. In oth er words: "Figures don't lie, but
liars write figures." And , of cours e, th ey can employ th e sam e kind
of "samplin gs" to popularize a Kennedy or an Eis enhower , a
"World Court" or "Federal Aid to Education" issue . . . and th ey
can - and do - employ the same methods to downgrade a Joe
McCarthy, a General Walker , a Congressional Investigating Com-
mittee.
Now we are confronted with another very logical qu estion: how
can th e purported "opinions" of a mere thousand people sway the
thinking of millions of peopl e? Again, th e answer is very simpl e:
practically all of th e nation's newspapers publish th e "GALLUP
POLL." Not one ever casts any doubt on its reliability ... not one
ever reveals th e paucity of its "samplings" . .. not one ever reveals
how th e Gallup "reporters" seek out th e "right" kind of peopl e in
ord er to get th e kind of "answers" th ey want to feed to th e public.
Indeed , many newspapers, such as th e New York Tim es, th e W ash-
ington Post, St. Louis Post-Dispatch (all "Liberal" pap ers) assur e
th eir readers, by innuendo or oth erwise, that th e "Gallup Poll" is
GOSPEL . . . And through th e years , th e vast majority of th e
American peopl e have been believin g what their newspapers tell
them - and you can 't bl am e th em, because to this very day many
of them believe th ey have a fr ee pr ess, a free Radio, a fr ee TV.
All that, despite th e fact that th e "Gallu p Poll" went far astray
on a number of occasions - especially in its political polls ; as, for
one example, in th eir 1948 Presid ential election poll s - also in th e
off-years of 1942 and 1946. But they alw ays come up with a simple
excuse - said excuse being that th ere was a sudden shift in public
opinion between th e publication of th e poll and th e days th e vot es
were cast . .. even though the lapse of tim e was only a few days!
-13-
 Next in importanc e to th e "Gallup Poll" is th e "Roper Poll," own-
ed and operated by Elmo Rop er, th at most arde nt supporter of
W endell Willki e. The "Roper Poll" usually runs parallel with th e
"Gallup Poll."
MR. ROPER IS A HIGHLY PRIZED MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN
RELATIONS I ! !

Now let's go on to see how th e Kennedy Boys fit into th is

genera l scheme .
- - -e - - -

WHY KENNEDY WAS "ELECTED"

- - -e - - -

Kennedy's "election" to the Presidency was no happenstance. It

was ordained by th e C,F,R. Wi th Nixon th e "Republican" candidate
and Kenne dy th e "Democrat" candida te, as far as the CFR was con-
cern ed , it was a case of "Heads we win and Tails you lose." How-
eve r, th ey left no trick und one to make sure th at th e Kenn edy
boy would "win," The fact that three pr ecin ct wor kers in Chicago
we nt to prison for tamperin g with th e vote counts is just one in-
dicati on of it.
Th e CFR mad e Kenned y th eir first choi ce, not becau se Nixon
would have been a less-willin g tool, but becau se Kenn edy's ego,
his arrogance, his ruthlessness, his gree d for personal power in-
dicated th at he would b e a mor e perfect one. Ho wever, th ey took
no chan ces with our would-be Ceasar - the Kennedy Cabinet and
the vast majority in the important posts in Wa shington are mem-
bers or hirelings of the CFR!
- - -e - - -

PREFACE TO KENNEDY PROFILES.

- -e -- -

Through th e yea rs, psycholo gists have been tellin g us th at en-

vir onm ent alone do es not mold th e man . Broken homes; p arental
neglect; disregard of morals by one pa rent or th e oth er, thus lead-
in g to a feelin g of insecurity; parental failure to guide th eir chil-
dren's choic es of comp anionship - all such th ings contribute heav-
ily to juvenile delinqu ency. But th ere is a more potent influence in
th e make-up of a man (or a woman) - an influ ence th at usually is
not visible, an influ en ce th at can best be describ ed by th e word
HERITAGE. W e often hear such expressions as: "Like Father, like
son" - or "he comes by it honestly," th e "it" being an addiction to
-14-
crime, to dishonesty, to immoralit y, etc., etc. Which means that
every one of us is born with a "heritage" for good or for evil, for
honesty or for dishon esty - a heritage of family traits and char-
act eristi cs whi ch can be tra ced back into ancestry. Biographers of
Alexander th e Great, of Julius Ceasar, of Abrah am Lincoln, probe
th e family (ancestral) ba ckgrounds of th eir subj ects - and establish
th at ancestral traits come down through generations, to show up
in th e actions and in th e ambitions of almost every individual .. .
all of Shakespear e's gre at heroes and villain s were characte rized by
th e famil y tr aits of th eir for eb ears.
Now, with some, th e "heritage" may lie dormant throughout th eir
spans of life - or may b e conquered by th e individual . .. with
oth ers, th e "heritage" takes possession virtually at birth - and con-
tinues as th e ruling influ ence to th e end of life.
Th e histor y of th e Roth schild famil y provides concrete proof to
support my th esis th at a "heritage" of principles is handed down
from generation to genera tion - and frequently fun ctions as the
rulin g influ ence in a man's career. It was th e fir st of th e Roth schilds
who, 200 or more yea rs ago, proclaimed th at if he could get con-
trol of th e money system of a nation, it would not matter who was
the rul er of th at nation, he (Rothschild) would be its master. Th at
"heritage" has rul ed th e lives and careers of all th e Roth schild s to
this very day. Another notable, and concrete, example is th e first
John D. Rockefeller - he handed down his "heritage" of gree d for
wea lth and power to his son and to his son's sons. Anoth er, and even
more significant, example is th e one th at can best be describ ed as
a "Racial" Heritage. I refer to th at anc ient (m ythological) tale th at
Almight y God had "chosen" th e Heb rews to inh erit and rul e th e
World . Tho se ancient Hebrew s passed th at "promise" on to th eir
descend ants as th eir "RACIAL heritage" - a "heritage," which said
descend ants, l e~itimate and illegitimate, have ever since been
endeavo ring to 'collect" and thu s kept th e entire world in bloody
turmoil th roughout all th e centur ies clear ba ck into antiquity. In th e
18th and 19th centuries th ese "collectors" went unde r th e name of
"ILLU MIN ATI" - tod ay th eir "collection agency" is better
known as "The Int ernationalists-Communist Conspiracy acti vely,
but surreptitiously, operated in Americ a by th e "COUNCIL ON
FOREIGN RELATIONS," with counterpart organ izations in Brit ain
and all oth er nations throughout th e world.
A thorough appraisal of th e men who compose th e Hierar chy of
th e ICC and th e CFR clearly reveals wh y th ey are governe d by
that anci ent "Racial Heritage." As with th e Roth schilds, a number
of th e present Hierarchy ar e lineal descendants of th e most fana-
tical "ILLUMINATES" of th e 18th and 19th centuries.
-15-
 H owever, th e genera l (1 ,500 ) membership of th e "Council on
Foreign Relations" is a d ifferent story - one th at undoubtedly
baffles tho se wh o are only surface-aware of th e nature of the CFR.
For manv of th e "resident" and "non-resident" memb ers are men
who , by reason of ancestry, are not subj ect to th e influ ences of th at
ancient "Heritage" - indee d, th ey should be unalterabl y opposed
to it - yet, th ey knowin gly and willingly render full service and
fealt y to it. Why? The answer is very simpl e : th ese men are op-
portunists in whom avarice for wealth and power rises above all
principles of honor, of decency, of integrit y . .. and that brings us
to the Kennedy s!
- - -e - --

THE KENNEDY "HERITAGE"

- - -e - - -
Th e Kenned y with whom we are chiefly concerne d is John F .,
th e Chief Exec utive of our nation - God help us!
I say "God help us," becau se, with th e possible exception of
Franklin Roosevelt, John Kenn edy is th e most deadl y menace to our
Freed oms and to th e SOVEREIGNTY of our nati on th at we have
ever had in th e White House.
F or concrete evide nce th at I am not alon e in th at belief, on May
9 of thi s yea r, all th e F ront-pages in our nati on blazed with th is
warning by none othe r th an Dwight Eisenh ower : "JF K POWER
GRAB PERILS LIBERTY!" .. . In th e body of his statement, Eisen-
how er elucida ted th at headline with a grim and clear warning th at
John F . Kennedy is a MENACE to th e American peopl e and our
nation.
Now, a defender of Kenn ed y might well retort: "Look who's talk-
ing!" And he'd be perfectl y right. E isenhower killed th e Bricker
Amendment in ord er to safeg ua rd HIS grabs for pow er . . . he
fr antically tri ed to force rep eal of th e Connally Amendment . . .
he constantly advocate d th e transfer of all power, including Nucl ear ,
to th e "United Nations" - and th at, quite aside from his delivery of
Berlin and th e Balkans to Moscow, only scratche s th e surface of
Ei senh ower's efforts to aid and ab et th e Con spira cy to destr oy th e
sovereignty of our nation. Nevertheless, his warning th at Kenn edy
is our grea t menace is ab solutely sound. And that may bring up
one of two qu estion s with various rea de rs : .. . 1) W ere my reviews of
Ei senhower's collaborations overdrawn? . . . 2) H as h e "seen the
light" - is his warning prompted by remorse?
My answe r to both questions is: NO!
-16-
 Ike was motivat ed to issue th at wa rn ing by th e same emotion
th at imp elled Trygvie Lie to flatl y confirm th e Hi ss-Molotov secret
agree ment in his book "In Th e Cause Of Peace," i.e. : Beginning
with th e production of "Thieves' Paradise" in 1947, we endeavored
to alert th e nati on to th e existe nce of th at Hiss-Molotov agreeme nt.
But 1947 was too early - th e UN still was a "holy of holies," and
th e "righteously indignant" deni als by th e Stat e D epartment and
th e Pentagon null ified our cha rge . But in 1952, our rev ival of th e
play, supported by several "News-Bulletins" in which we re vea led
all of th e UN betrayals in th e Korean W ar , including th e fact th at
Moscow's Gen . Vasiliev, on leave of absence from the UN , was th e
actual Comm ander-in-Chief of th e North Koreans and Red Chinese,
crea ted such repercussions as to fri ghten th e Mas term inds of th e
On e-World Conspira cy. Once again th e Stat e Dep artment and th e
Pent agon issued indi gnant denials - but thi s tim e th eir deni als
had become "suspect" - a growing dem and to "Get the U. S. out
of the U.N." began to swee p th e nati on. The "Masterminds" decid ed
that a flat den ial by Tr ygvie Lie was vitally necessary - but Li e
refu sed to commit such an outright falseho od. That was "curtains"
for him! After he was ousted from his lush job with th e UN, Li e,
findin g him self a (deliberately) "forgotte n man ," d ecid ed to wr ite
"In Th e Cause Of Peace." And, wh ether motivat ed by desire for
reven ge, or by a troubled conscience, he flatl y confirmed the H iss-
Molotov agree ment in th at book.
Now, it wasn't long after Eisenhower moved out of th e White
Hou se that he found him self almost as mu ch a "forgotte n man" as
Trygvie Lie. With thi s diff erenc e: At best, ex-officios are a dime a
doz en, so to speak. Under any circum stances, EX-Secr et ar y-General
Lie would have been a "forgotte n man" - th e "Masterminds" have
no time to waste on useless "retired old gentleme n." Still, th ey
might occasionally have "invited" him to make an appearance at
semi-importa nt functions in th e inn ocuous role of "elderly states-
man." But wh en he refu sed to lie for th em he commi tted a "cardin-
al sin" - and becam e a forgotten pariah . . . does anyone hear
of Try gvie Lie today?
Now, of course, th at isn't th e case with Ei senh ower. Th at "Mili-
tary Genius" never disobeyed. During his years as Comma nde r-
in-Chief of th e Allied Armi es he faithfully carr ied out all th e
orders of th e "Masterminds" .. . Ditto whe n he was head of NATO
. . . ditto during hi s eight yea rs in th e White House. During all
tho se yea rs he wa s a tremendous value to th e "Masterminds" -
and th ey made him feel th at he was th e most important man on
earth. But th e moment he became an EX-Presid ent his valu es for
th e "Masterminds" becam e virtually nil. As far as th ey are con-
-17-
cerned , he now is just another "retired old gentleman" puttering
away on th e golf courses. In other words, h e is a case of "Th e King
is d ead , long liv e th e Kin g." They have no tim e to waste on th e
"de ad Kin g" - all th eir inter est now is in th e new "King."
F or a brief period, Eis enhower enjoyed his "retirem ent." But,
as we know, he is a very vain man. For eight years he had b een
th e Mr. BIG in W ashington - for eight years th e whole world
kow-towed to him. H e was th e gr eat Star in th e gr eatest "Show"
in th e world. All of a sudden he is no lon ger th e Star - he is just
an innocuous "Elde rly Statesman" - all th e ch eers and plaudits
of th e "aud ience" are for th e new Star. The loss of th e "lime light"
b egan to irk him. H e began to burn more and more as he saw th e
" young up start" in th e White House seize all th e powers he ( E isen-
hower ) had preserved for himself by killing th e Brick er Amend-
ment - and grabbing for m ore and more power! What p articul arl y
"b urns" Ik e is that he has always viewed Kennedy as a b ra sh , half-
baked young political opportunist - and h e finally blurted hi s
"burn" in th at startling May 9 h eadline.
Now, undoubtedly, th er e are man y among us who b elieve th at
Eis enhower's warning was prompted by loyalty to country . . .
other s, who have a b etter understanding of th e man, ma y feel
that his conscience had som ething to do with it . . . but quite a
few others, myself among th em , know he h as no consc ience, and
that hi s warning was an outcr y of deepl y wounded vanity. How-
eve r, what ev er it was th at prompted him , his charge th at Ken-
nedy is a men ace to our nation is po sitively sound and accur ate . ..
and now let's go back to Kennedy.
To ge t a clear image of this Kenned y man - to see .what ~akes
him (and his whole family ) tick , we mu st uncover his part~cular
"H eritage" that feeds his GREED for powers not gra nted to 111m ? y
our Constitution - powers which th e American people never in-
tended to give him. In th e following, you will see why I am full y
qualifi ed to uncover his "He ritage ."
Early in 1930 I receiv ed a hurry call from Hollywood to come
to th e aid of an ailing Film production. In 1930 th e "talkie" was
still in its infan cy, and many of th e Hollywood (silent) scr een writers
had not yet mastered th e art of adapting di alo gu e to action. H ence,
th e calls from Hollywood producers for Broadway playwrights and
directors wer e fr equent in those days. The Film I was called to
"do ctor" was th e famous "H OL ID AY" - th e Producer was th e
Pathe Pictures Corporation - JOSEPH P. KENNEDY was th e
owner of PATHE!
"H OLID AY" turned out to b e th e prize-winning Film of that
-18-
year. For my reward, Pathe made me a very tempting offer to take
charge of th e story department - and that was when and how I
came to know a great deal about Joe Kennedy.
Kenn edy was a very recent newcomer in the Film industry. He
knew very littl e, if anything, about "show bu siness" as a whole.
Ed B. D err, th e Kenn edy-appointed President of Pathe, had for
many years been Kennedy's chief accountant. Charles Sullivan,
Treasurer of Pathe, also was a long-tim e Kennedy employee. Neither
of th em knew very much about th e Film business - but both of
th em kn ew all about Joe Kenn edy.
By 1928 Hollywood was in th e throes of transformation from
"Silents" to "Talkies." That change was having a profound effe ct on
Show Business in gen eral, but on Vaudevill e in particular. The
Vaudevill e Moguls did not anticipate complet e death for their
industry, but th ey did realize that th e "Talkie" was going to b ecome
their greatest competition in th e years to com e. And th ey began to
ponder wa ys and means to make th e "Film" an integral, but minor
(th ey hop ed ) feature in th eir theatres ... and that was wh en Joe
Kenn edy saw an opportunity to turn an easy dollar for himself!
At th e tim e that Kennedy stepped into th e picture, th e two giant
Vaudevill e chains w ere Keith-Albee and the Orpheum Circuit. Ed
Albee was head of Keith-Albee, and Martin Beck was th e head of
Orpheum. Actually, however , some years earlier, Alb ee and Beck
had pooled th eir booking op erations in what was known as the
"UNIT E D BOOKING OFFICE," so both chains were controlled by
Albee.
The proposition Kennedy submitted to Albee wa s ing enious -
if it had been feasible. Kennedy not only promised to save Vaude-
ville, but also to transform th e Keith-Alb ee-Orpheum Circuit into
the greatest Show Busin ess emp ire in th e nation. What he submitted
was a three-prong proposition:
No.1. ) Set up a motion picture producing company of th eir
own - th eir own chains of th eatres alone would assure inst antan-
eous financial success for th e Producing Corporation; even more
important: th eir vastly sup erior Films would minimize th e com-
petition from non-vaudevill e Movi e Theatres . . . and new com er
Kenn edy blandly assured Albee that he luul th e "know- how" to
produce Films that would make eve n Paramount and MGM look
amat eurish by com parison . . . No.2) Set up th eir own Distributing
Or ganization (Exchanges) - not only to serv e th eir own th eatres,
but to mak e a drive for the bookings of all ind ep endently-owned
(parti cularly Vaudeville) theatres in th e nation ... No.3) Set up
a new Corporation (or Holding Company) and transfer ownership
-19-
of th eir Ch ain s to th at Corporation in return for Stock - and th en
FORCE all the small-cha ins and own ers of individual Vau deville
Theatres to tr ansfer th eir th eat res to th e new Corp orati on in re-
turn for Stock an d man ageri al job s.
Albee was dubious a bout th at last fea ture in No. 3, but Kenn ed y
promptly showe d him th e "b lackiack" th at would acco mplish it ;
to wit: all th e sma ll chain s and ind ep endents dep ended up on th e
Keith-Albee owned "United Bookin g Office" for th eir merchand ise
(Vaudeville Ac ts) - all th e recalcitrant (stubborn) sma ll-chai n
and ind ep endent th eatre owners could simply be denied all th e
good Acts - and that w ould be "death" at th eir box-offices!
Of course, th at was a ruthless "surrender or d ie" ultimatum -
but, accord ing to Cha rlie Sullivan and man y other Kennedy em-
ployees and associates, "surrende r or die" was th e pet techniqu e
Joe Kenn ed y employed to amass hi s fabulous (est imated four hun-
dred million) fortune . .. one can't accumulate that kind of for-
tun e [ust: by hoarding hard-earned nickels and dimes - now , can
one?
Albee swa llowed Kenned y's "pie in th e sk y" bait as hungrily as
a tr out snaps at a fly. In hi s mind's eye he saw hims elf as th e future
Emperor of th e Vaudeville-Motion Picture world ... of course, he
didn't eve n dream that foxy Joe had reserved that high spot for him-
self - anyw ay, he gave Joe th e word to go ahead.
Now, each of th e vari ous op erations in th e Kenned y plan required
a sepa rate corpora tion. E ach corporati on required its own Stock
issue. Each Stock issue had to be "properly" allocated and man i-
pulated . . . Can you guess who did all the "manipulating?" Th at' s
right - Joseph P. Kenned y.
Now , I'm sure THIS will sur prise you : with eac h "manipulation"
th e holdings of Albee, Beck and th e Keith heirs dim inished and
diminished and diminished , whil e th e holdings of Joe Kenn ed y
p yramided and pyrami ded and pyram ided . . . and th en one (not
so) fin e day Vaudeville br eathed its last and wa s "laid away to rest
in peace." And with it wa s buried th at glittering Vaudeville-Motion
Picture (dream) Empire th at Kenned y "sold" to Ed Albee. Th e AI-
b ees, Becks and Keiths disappeared from th e Hollywood scene -
but not Joe Kenn edy! RKO and Path e (the produ cing division
of th e "dream") became Joe Kenned y Lots. But not for long.
Kennedy wasn't kidding himself wh en he "sold" Albee his ma g-
ical "knowhow" to produce supe rior Films - he knew he didn't
belon g in Holl ywood - he quickly disposed of hi s Lots, pi cked up
his "wi nnings," and dep arted for oth er fields ripe for his "talents"
and sh rewd operations.
-20-
 In d iscussing th e Kenn ed y "talents" and operations, Charlie Sul-
livan said : "Take th e words Greed , Ruthless, Connivin g, Scheming,
Unscrupulous, etc., roll all of th em into one and you have Joe
Kennedy ."
But let' s be fair abo ut it, "he came by it (that "Her itage") honest-
ly" - Joe's father arr ived in Boston a penniless and mor e or less
illiterat e stee rage immi grant. His fir st job was swamper in an off-Skid
Row saloon - soon he was th e bartender - before very lon g he
was th e owner of th at saloon . Don't ask how he acco mplishe d it.
In th ose years the neighborhood saloon wa s th e pr ecin ct's political
"club house," so it wasn't lon g before th e "immigrant" was wi elding
considera ble political influence in th at pr ecin ct - with a resultant
finger in all "political pies" . . . which brought man y an "honest
dollar" into his pocket - even "a piece" of a neighborh ood bank.
Son Joe's operations were fa r mor e spe ctac ular and far more en-
richin g, but th ey had th e same Kenned y touch .
Thi s analysis of th e Kenned y "He ritage" would not be complete
without th e followin g anecdote - particularl y as it reveals th e
Kenn ed y driving gree d for power which paved th e way for one
Kenn ed y into th e White House and another Kenned y into th e U. S.
Attorney Generalship long before either of th e Boys wa s in his
teens.
John Connolly, an old friend of min e, was a teen-age pal of Joe
Kenn ed y's. Lat er, th ey were partners in Kenned y's early real esta te
operati ons in Boston. John fr equently regaled me with stori es of th e
th en young Joe's crafty operations, of his arrogance, of his gra n-
diose ambitions - among th em nothing less th an th e Pr esiden cy
of th e United States.
John was an usher at Joe Kenned y's wed din g to Rosie Fitzgerald .
Some years lat er he also wa s present at an anniversary celebration
of th at marriage. During th at evening, Kenn ed y, by th en well along
th e road to th e vast fortune he fin all y amasse d, boastfull y an nounce d
th at afte r he had mad e his "pile" his next objective would be th e
Wh ite Hou se. Th at "dream" was rudely jolted by none other th an
his fath er-in-law , "Ho ney" Fitzgerald , wh ose own politi cal career
had an odor not to be confused with atta r of roses. Fitzgerald
bluntly warn ed Joe that if he ever tr ied to run for any political of-
fice he'd be a "soft touch" for any opponent-with all th e skeletons
th at would come tumbling out of his closets he (Joe ) would be a
dead pigeon before th e campaign would be a week old.
That was th e end of Joe's aspirations for th e White House - for
himself! But like th e Red s, th e Kenned ys never give up. In th e early
1930s, wh en Joe Kenned y was fancyin g hims elf a Holl ywood Mogul ,
-21-
he boastfully vowed that one fin e day there would be a Kennedy
in the White House - and then another Kennedy and another and
another. He vow ed that he 'd spend half of all his millions to ac-
complish it.
- - -e - - -

And that is th e "HERITAGE" that Jack Kenned y brought with

him into th e White House - th e "H ERITAGE" which governs his
every act and d eed - th e "HERITAGE" which he is determined
to transform into a dictatorship of th e United States.
In our next issue I will reveal th e step-by-step "manipulations"
he has been employing - and is continuing to employ - to make
hims elf th e "Philip Dru" of America - I will show how he plans
to disarm th e United States government and every individual and
hurl us into an Internationalist-Communist On e-World Govern-
ment - I will show that KENNEDY MUST BE IMPEACHED if
we hope to save our Country! . .. In th at issue I will provide a
com plete survey of all of Kennedy's horrifying acts of obvious tr ea-
son!
I had int ended to include that surv ey in this issue, but I soon
reali zed that it is far too important to be crowded into a few
pages - it will require a complet e "Ne ws-Bulletin" to provide a
clear picture of his plottings.
Aside from that, I felt th at I shou ld clarify all th e ramifications
under which th e "Council On Foreign Relations" is operating, as
th at will tend to clarify, at a glance, every Kenn edy "manipulation"
to transform th e U. S. into an enslaved unit of th e CFR's planned
On e-World Government.
Now, all of the above ma y bring th e read er to wonder how Ken-
ned y can recon cile his "H E RITAGE" with that of th e Hierarchy
of the ICC-CFR - how he can achi eve his "PH ILI P DRU" ob-
jective and yet fu lfill th e ICC-CFR obj ective. Th e answer is simpl e:
whatever else may be said of th e Kennedys, we must admit th ey are
fiendishly crafty - Machiavelli had nothing on th em in th eir
d eviousness of plotting and conniving. Joe always opera ted on th e
th eory: "if you can't lick 'em, join 'em." He "joined" Ed Albee and
"took" th e Keith-Albee-Orpheum empire . Ja ck can 't hope to "take"
th e ICC-CFR as easily as th at , but serving as th eir cre ated "Philip
Dru" will give him a mighty good star t - aft er all, th e mighty
Ceasar had to serv e as Consul befor e he achi eved his compl ete
mas tery of Rom e and of all of th e th en known world. However, if
Jackie-boy thinks he can - and will try to - outsmart th e CFR
boys , he is "asking" for th e sam e thing that Cea sar got from Brutus.
- 22-
 - - -e - --

TWO VERY ILLUMINATING INCIDENTS

- - -e - - -

If an y of my readers still have any ling ering b eliefs that I have

exaggera ted and over-estimated th e fiendish powers of th e CFR,
th e following inciden ts should utterl y dispel thos e doubts . . .
equally important, one of th e inciden ts will starkly reveal th e cor -
ruptness in th e moral fibre of the Kenned ys - of John F . Kenn edy,
in particular :
No.1 ) In 1944 Tom D ew ey was th e Republican candidate for
th e Pr esid enc y of th e United States. In that year Franklin D . Roose-
velt was at th e very crest of his popularity - he still was th e idol
of th e vast majority of th e American people. Although th er e w er e
some very faint whispers that th e "great humanitarian" w as not
quite th e "humanitarian" his worshippers believed him to b e, th e
CFR, whos e very loyal servant h e was , quickly suppressed all thos e
vague rumors - and thus assured another landslide victory over
Dewey.

However , shortly after D ew ey achieved his nomination, he was

provided with fully do cumented and irr efutable proof th at FDR
had plotted and incite d the Japanese to commit that horrible "Pearl
Harbor" atrocity - in order to enable him to hurl th e U. S. into
World War II!
Had Dew ey revea led that proof, it not onl y would have won th e
election for him , but it positively would have brought Roosevelt to
tri al for tr eason and murder - and surely led to his execution.

As a matter of known fact, D ew ey was all set to use th at story

at a properl y cho sen tim e. But one of his most trusted lieuten an ts,
a CFR stooge, hurriedl y sent word about it to CF R headquarters.
Th e CF R promptly order ed D ew ey to "shut up , OR ELSE!" . . .
And Dew ey "shut up" - and Roosevelt went on to commit his final
betrayals at Yalta.
After D ew ev's defeat it became known that he had failed to use
a "story" that ~ould have won victory for him - but it was explain-
ed aw ay by a sta teme nt that General Geor ge Marshall had induced
him not to reveal his story for fear that it could h ave spelled disas -
ter for our War policies - and D ew ey was duly eulogized for his
" patriotism ."

-23-
 - -- e -- -

JFK'S FIRST MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE

- - -e- - -

No.2) In 1960, shortly aft er Nixon became th e Republican can-

didate, he was handed the following documented story about John
F . Kenn edy. It was a photostatic cop y of an item in :
"T he Blauvelt Family Geneology," compiled by Louis L. Blau-
velt, and published by "The Association of Blauv elt Descend ants."
It bears th e "United States Library of Congress Catalog Card No .
56-10936." Th e following item was pho tostated from pa ge 884 of
th e book :
" (12, 4 2 7 ) DURIE, (Ke rr), MALCOM, (Isabel O . Cooper , 11 ,304). We
have no birth date. She was born Kerr, but took the name of her
stepfather. She first married Firmin Desloge, IV. They were d ivorc ed.
Durie then married F. John Bersbach. They were divorced, and she
married, third, John F. Kennedy, son of Joseph P. Kennedy, one time
ambassador to England. There were no children of the second or th ird
marriages."

This reveals that thi s man who poses as a devout Catholic, this
piou s man , who , ostentatiously never misses a Mass, ha s through
the years been making a mockery of his Church-has secretly smash-
ed the most sacred canon of his Church.
Unquestionably, if Nixon had used th at item in his campa ign
he not only would have won the election, but it would hav e tor-
pedo ed Jack (and all th e Kenn edys) out of the poli tica l world for-
ever. Actually, Nixon did plan to use it - but word of his intention
reached th e CFR. They took the same action with him that th ey had
taken with Dewey in 1944: th ey ord ered him to "Shut up - OR
ELSE!" And Nixon "shut up" . .. and Jack Kenn edy went on his
merry way to destroy the SOVEREIGNTY of the Uni ted States -
and the Freedoms and Liberty of th e Americ an peop le!
There is only one thing that will stop him: IMPEACHMENT! I
Impeachment of Kenn edy will au tom at ically lead to Con gression-
al investigations of the CFR - of our State D epartment - of all
F ed era l Agencies - of UNESCO - and, finally, of the UNITED
NATI ONS!! !
Believe me: THAT is our only SALVATION ... You will clearly
see why in our next issue.

- 24-
 Published by

CINEMA EDUCATIONAL GUILD, INC.

s-, Hollywood 46, Calif.
P. O. Box 46205, Cole
--e--
Organized to Combat Communism
--e--
MYRON C. FAGAN, NATIONAL DIRECTOR
--e--

May, 1962 - News-Bulletin

--e--
KNOW the TRUTH and the TRUTH shall make you FREE.
--e--
The most important thing for all of us to always remember is
that the salvation of our Country depends upon getting the TRUTH
of the GREAT CONSPIRACY to all of the American people.
When-and if-that will be accomplished our nation will again
be FREE-and SAFE. Our press won't do it-you know why-
so it is up to YOU and me to do it.
--e--
This News-Bulletin copyrighted May 1962
Price per copy, fifty cents
All rights reserved
--e--
For members of CEG the price is 25 cents per copy.