You are on page 1of 1

Development of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor

(AnMBR) for Municipal Wastewater Treatment


J. Cumin*, Y. Hong*, M. Dagnew*, R. Bayly*, W. Parker**
*GE Water & Process Technologies, ON, Canada
**Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada

GE
Water & Process Technologies

Introduction/Abstract Pilot design and integration Results


By integrating membrane to digesters it is Table 2. summarizes the values obtained for BOD5,
possible to run anaerobic digesters at a relatively 1. Cassette COD, and TSS in the feed and permeate streams.
extended SRT and shorter HRT, which minimizes The average BOD removal during municipal and
washout of the slow growing anaerobic bacteria. molasses added municipal WW operation were 87
The pilot scale AnMBR was built and operated and 96% respectively.
with commercial piloting method for about 18
Figure 5 presents the instantaneous flux and
months with screened and molasses added
corresponding TMP during the bioreactor’s transient
municipal wastewater.
and steady state condition. During the municipal
This study has demonstrated that it is feasible to wastewater test period, the TMP was less than 5
employ AnMBR for municipal wastewater kPa, and membrane fouling was not observed.
treatment at an ambient temperature. During the Upon addition of molasses to the municipal WW the
8.5 hrs HRT and 80-100 days SRT conditions, the sustainable TMP increased to 30 kPa (Figure 6).
sustainable membrane TMP was < 30 kPa at a
flux of 17 LMH and average effluent BOD of 14 Table 2. Summary of key AnMBR process performance.
mg/L were achieved.
Molasses +
Municipal WW
Value Municipal WW Unit
Feed Permeate Feed Permeate

BOD5 93 14 200 8 mg/L

Methodologies COD 224 47 580 67 mg/L


The pilot scale AnMBR was designed, constructed Figure 2. AnMBR cassette picture: Cassette is attached to
pressure vessel cap; Prototype modules (2 x 29 ft2) TSS 130 0 181 0 mg/L
and fed with 3 mm screened sewage from the
Skyway WWTP, Burlington, Ontario. The
TKN 26 27 28 19 mg/L
operating tank volume was 630 L. This volume
included an anaerobic bioreactor of 550L and a 2. Membrane tank TP 2.8 2.5 5 2.1 mg/L
separate membrane tank of 80 L through which
the bioreactor contents were re-circulated (Figure Figure 5. Instantaneous operating flux (LMH) and TMP (kPa)
1). A summary of the pilot scale steady state profile during molasses added wastewater treatment
AnMBR operating parameters are shown in Table
1. During steady state the HRT were 8.5 and 17
hrs. and the OLR were 0.6 and 0.9 g COD/l/day
for screened and molasses dosed municipal
wastewater operation, respectively. The SRT were
80-100 days.

Figure 1. Schematic of AnMBR system

Figure 6. Instantaneous operating flux (LMH) and TMP (kPa)


Figure 3. Membrane tank diagram: reactor working volume 80 L; profile during molasses added municipal wastewater treatment
module design 500d; Membrane reactor is operated in a side
loop attached to Anaerobic Digester

3. Anaerobic digester (CSTR)

Table 1. Summary of AnMBR operation Parameters.

8.7 HRT, 2 module, 17 HRT, 1 module ,


17 HRT
Molasses
Screened 1 g COD/L/day
1 module 1 gCOD/L/day
added
Parameters Municipal Unit
Municipal 0.6
WW
WW
Tank volume 630 630 L
Instantaneous flux 10 (17) 10 (17) gfd (LMH) Conclusions
Surface area 5.4 5.4 m2 • Achieved sustainable flux of 17 lmh.
• Effluent quality achieved BOD < 15 mg/L, TSS~
HRT 8.5 17 Hours 0 mg/L.
• 12 months of stable operation for municipal
SRT 80 - 100 80 - 100 Days wastewater application.
• Membrane cleaning required after 3 months of
OLR 0.6 0.9 g COD/L/d
operation for molasses dosed operation at 17
Figure 4. Anaerobic digester : Operation volume 540L; lmh
Biogas sparging Sequential Sequential 10/10
Insulated and heating capability; Configured for testing with • New lower energy opportunities for wastewater
Temperature 22 ± 1 22 ± 1 °C municipal low strength and molasses added wastewater treatment exist and AnMBR will play a central
role in alternative WWTP flowsheets in the
future.

You might also like