ASSIGNMENT # 3

QUESTION 1:

We applied Pearson correlation in this question because they are measure in likert scale so both
are quantitative variables.
The significant value is less than 0.5, so this data is significant and they have positive
relationship. The Pearson correlation value is 57.4%. The “N” is 43. The data show that 57.4%
chances are if 1st quiz marks are high so 2nd quiz marks will also high.
QUESTION 2:
We applied Pearson correlation in this question because they are measure in likert scale so they
are quantitative variables.
The significant value is greater than 0.5, so this data is insignificant so quiz 1 marks has no
relationship with any satisfaction elements. The “N” is 43.

QUESTION 3:

We applied Pearson correlation in this question because they are measure in likert scale so they
are quantitative variables.
The significant value is greater than 0.5, so this data is insignificant so quiz 2 marks has no
relationship with any satisfaction elements. The “N” is 43.
QUESTION 4:

We applied Pearson correlation in this question because they are measure in likert scale so both
are quantitative variables.
The significant value is less than 0.5, so this data is significant and they have positive
relationship. The Pearson correlation value is 72.4%. The “N” value is 43.

QUESTION 5:

We applied Pearson correlation in this question because they are measure in likert scale so both
are quantitative variables.
The significant value is greater than 0.5, so this data is insignificant and they have no
relationship. The Pearson correlation value is 15.9%. The “N” value is 43.
QUESTION 6:

We applied Pearson correlation in this question because they are measure in likert scale so both
are quantitative variables.
The significant value is greater than 0.5, so this data is insignificant and they have no
relationship. The Pearson correlation value is 8.1%. The “N” value is 43

QUESTION 7:

We applied Pearson correlation in this question because they are measure in likert scale so both
are quantitative variables.
The significant value is less than 0.5, so this data is significant and they have positive
relationship. The Pearson correlation value is 52.9%. The “N” value is 43.
QUESTION 8:

We applied Pearson correlation in this question because they are measure in likert scale so they
are quantitative variables.
The significant value of brand name, brand image, CBM management, CBM permanent faculty,
CBM extra circular activities, CBM course structure, CBM crowd are greater than 0.5, so this
data is insignificant so CBM fee structure has no relationship with these elements. The “N” is
43.
The significant value of CBM location and CBM infrastructure are less than 0.5, so this data is
significant and they have positive relationship the Pearson correlation of CBM location is 41.9%
and CBM infrastructure is 30.3%. Hence this show that fee structure has impact on location and
infrastructure. The “N” value is 43.
QUESTION 9:

We applied Pearson chi-square in this question because they are qualitative variables.
The significant value is greater than 0.5, so this data is insignificant and they have no
relationship. The “N” value is 43.
QUESTION 10:

We applied Pearson chi-square in this question because they are qualitative variables.
The significant value is less than 0.5, so this data is significant and they have positive
relationship. The “N” value is 43.