HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY Document Code

....
FACULTY OF CULTURAL SCIENCES
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
SEMESTER-BASED COURSE PLAN
DATE OF
COURSE CODE COURSE GROUP CREDIT SEMESTER
WRITING
19F04132802 MAJOR COMPETENCE
PSYCHOLINGUISTICS 2 6 10 June 2019
COURSE
Semester-based course plan Course Group Coordinator Head of Department
Developer
AUTHORISED B Y: Dr. Abidin Pammu, M.A.,
Dra. Fransisca E. Kapoyos,
Dra. Fransisca E. Kapoyos, M.Hum Dipl.TESOL
M.Hum
Expected Department’s ELOs that must be referred to by the course
Learning ELO 1 Ability to apply academic and professional working culture in performing jobs related to English language, English
Outcome (ELO) literature, and English Language Teaching (ELT).
ELO 2 Ability to explain theories of English language, English literature or ELT required in related jobs.
ELO 3 Ability to explain the relationship between English language, English literature, ELT and cultural concepts required
in related jobs.
ELO 5 Ability to use online sources for research and employment purposes
ELO 10 Ability to apply English language, English literature, or English Language Teaching (ELT) theories to solve related
problems based on procedural steps.

Course Learning Outcome (CLO)

Having the ability to be creative and initiative in integrating various skills that support the main competencies.

Lesson Learning Outcome (LLO)

 LLO 1 The ability to explain great automatic grammatizator.
LLO 2 The ability to describe animals that can talk and the difference between animal language and human language.
LLO 3 The ability to describe grandmama, teeth, biological evidence for language innate capacities.
LLO 4 The ability to describe a language program that has been set up.
LLO 5 The ability to explain linguistic information from innate aspect that makes sense.
LLO 6 The ability to describe the phase of a child when he starts learning to speak.
LLO 7 The ability to explain language learning by young children: approach context and process context.
LLO 8 The ability to analyze linguistic propositions such as bizarre grammar. \
LLO 9 The ability to explain bizarre grammar.
LLO 10 The ability to explain the use of grammar to speak
LLO 11 The ability to explain language utterances
LLO 12 The ability to describe possible questions about language acquisition and knowledge in language use
Course This course aims to introduce the field of psycholinguistics to students and provide knowledge about basic concepts in psycholinguistic
Description scope such as language acquisition, speech perception, word recognition, lexical arrangement, process and reading sentences, to explore the
relationship between language, ideas and culture.
Learning 1. The Great Automatic Grammatizator - Need anything be innate?
Materials 2. Animal that try to talk - Is language restricted to human?
3. Grandmma’s Teeth. Is there biological evidence for innate language capacity?
4. Predistimate Grooves. Is there pre-ordained language ‘programme’?
5. A blueprint in the Brain. Could any linguistic information conceivably be innate?
6. Chattering Children. How do children get started on learning to speak?
7. Puzzling it out. Exactly how do children learn language?
8. Celestrial unintelligibility. Why do linguists propose such bizarre grammars?
9. The white elephant problem. Do we need a grammar in order to speak?
10. The case of the missing fingerprint. How do we understand speech?
11. Cheshire Cat’s grin. How do we plan and produce speech?
12. Banker’s clerk or hippopotamus. The future

References Main:
1. Aitchison, Jean. 2008.The Articulate Mammals: An introduction to psycholinguistics 5 ͤ ͩ . New York: Routledge.
2. Lightbown, Patsy M and Nina Spada. 2008. How Languages are learned 2 ͤ ͩ . New York: Oxford University Press.
Supporting:

2
Lecturers in 1. Dra. Nasmilah, M.Hum., PHd
charge 2. St. Sahraeny , S.S., M.Appling
3. Dra. Fransisca E. Kapoyos, M.Hum
Pre-requisite N/A
subject

3
 Leaning Activities
Scoring
Learning Methods, Learning Materials
Lesson Scoring Percentage

Meeting
Students’ Tasks, [References]
Week Learning
[ Estimated Time]
(%)
Outcomes
Indicator Scoring online offline
Criteria &
Scoring Form
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
I 1 The ability to Clarity in Criteria: - LSM Form:lecture - Contract 5
understanding of describing - Clarity , - PT + BM [(1 - RPS, CPMK,
the prerequisite the accuracy + 1) x Learning method: Permenristekdikti
concepts in one capabilities and (2x60m)] Self-directed no. 44 Year 2015,
semester. acquired Task: learning, Dokumen KKNI,
communic
and the Students Cooperative Peraturan
ative Akademik UNHAS.
activities register at Learning,
carried out the LMS and collaborative
in this learn how to learning, discovery
course. use LSM learning
more
efficiently
and
effectively TM [(2x(2x50m)

II 2 The ability to Clarity and Criteria: Form: lecture 5

explain natural accuracy in Clarity , LMS PT & BM - Semantics and
and situational describing accuracy and [1x (1x60m)] Learning method: Pragmatics,
language natural and class activity Assignment: self-directed aspects of
learning, small
4
 acquisition, situational Students group discussion language
irrelevance rats, language upload TM[ (2x(2x50m)] situations, etc.
and natural acquisition, assignments
language irrelevance regarding
rats, and language
natural biological
languages controls
behavior dan
language fits
into categories
III 3 The ability to Clarity, - Criteria: Form: lecture Chapter 2 15
describe the accuracy in Accuracy - Method: self-
ability of animal describing directed learning ,
to speak differences collaborative
between learning. TM[
animal (2x(2x50m)]
language and
human
language

5
IV 4 The ability to - Criteria: Form: lecture Chapter 3
describe Clarity, Clarity and LMS Method: self-
grandmama’s accuracy in accuracy directed learning,
teeth: biological explaining discussion
evidence for biological
language skills evidence: TM [ (2x(2x50m)]
5
that are innate human brain,
abilities spoken or teeth, tongue,
written texts. and vocal
cords that
have been
adapted
V 5 Ability to Clarity in Criteria: Form: lecture Chapter 4
describe explaining accuracy
preordained language Method: self-
language biological directing learning,
programs controls small group
behavior, discussion
language fits
into categories TM: [(2x(2x50m)]
of behaviour :
reach certain 5
level of
maturation,
develops
natural pace,
following
predictable
sequence of
milestones.

6
VI 6 The ability to Clarity: Criteria: Form: interactive Chapter 5
explain the accuracy in accuracy and lecture
brain's blueprint, describing the participation in
innate linguistic brain's discussions Method: Self
information blueprint for directed learning,
innate Cooperative
linguistic learning. 5
information
TM [2x(2x50m)]

VII 7 The ability to Clarity: Criteria: LMS PT & BM Form: interactive Chapter 6
describe the first accuracy in accuracy and [1x (1x60m)] lecture
time of children explaining the clarity Assignment:
to begin to speak child's phase students Method: Self
when he starts upload directed learning,
learning to assignments Cooperative
speak. about how learning. 10
children begin
learning to TM [2x(2x50m)]
speak (papers)
in groups of 3
students

VIII 8 MID TERM TEST 15

IX 9 The ability to Accuracy in Criteria: Form: Interactive Chapter 7 5
explain a child's describing accuracy and lecture,
phase of learning content clarity presentations in
language: content approach and
7
 approach and process Form of small groups TM
process approach.. approach. assessment: - [2x (2x50m)]
Oral questions
/answers

Group /
individual
work

X 10 Ability in Clarity: Criteria: Chapter 8 5

analyzing linguists accuracy in Clarity and
propose such analyzing accuracy LMS Form: Interactive
bizarre grammar: linguistic lecture,
linguistic knowledge participation in
knowledge. group discussions.
TM [2x (2x50m)]

XI 11 The ability to Clarity: Criteria: Form: Interactive Chapter 9 5

explain the use of Accuracy in lecture,
grammar in expressing the Clarity and LMS participation in
speaking use of accuracy group discussions.
grammar in TM [2x (2x50m)]
speaking

8
XII 12 The ability to Clarity in Criteria: LMS 5
Form: Interactive
describe the understanding Clarity
lecture,
understanding of of language and accuracy
participation in
language utterance:
group discussions.
utterance: understanding
TM [2x (2x50m)]
understanding and and producing Chapter 10
producing
XIII 13 The ability to Criteria: Form: Interactive 5
The ability to explain the Accuracy lecture and group
explain the design design and and clarity discussions. TM
and production of production of [2x (2x50m)] Chapter 11
utterances. utterances.
XIV- 14-15 Clarity and Criteria: LMS PT & BM 10
XV Accuracy in Clarity and [1x (1x60m)]
explaining accuracy Students upload
prospects for assignments
Ability to describe language regarding the
the prospects for acquisition relationship
language questions – between
acquisition language
questions and the Accuracy in knowledge and
relationship explaining language use,
between language language comprehension
knowledge and knowledge and and speech
language use, language use, production.
comprehension comprehension
and production of and production Chapter 12
utterance. of utterance.
XVI 16 FINAL TEST 15