HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF CULTURAL SCIENCES Document Code

....
ENGLISH DEPARTEMENT

SEMESTER-BASED COURSE PLAN

DATE OF
COURSE CODE COURSE GROUP CREDIT SEMESTER
WRITING
BASIC COMPETENCE
CRITICAL READING 19F04110502 2 2 4 June 2019
COURSE
Semester-based course plan Course Group Coordinator Head of Department
Developer
AUTHORISED BY: Dr. Abidin Pammu, M.A.,
Dra. Fransisca E. Kapoyos, Dra. Fransisca E. Kapoyos,
M.Hum. M.Hum. Dipl.TESOL

Expected Department’s ELOs that must be referred to by the course

Learning
Outcome (ELO) ELO 1 Ability to apply academic and professional working culture in performing jobs related to English language, English literature,
and English Language Teaching (ELT).

ELO 2 Ability to explain theories of English language, English literature or ELT required in related job.

ELO 3 Ability to explain the relationship between English language, English literature, ELT and cultural concepts required in related
jobs.

ELO 4 Ability to perform spoken and written English communication in the context of cultural diversity.

ELO 6 Ability to analyze spoken and written texts, based on English language, English literature or ELT theories.
 Course Learning Outcome (CLO)
CLO 1 Ability to understand and apply learning strategies to increase the comprehension and retention of information from texts
CLO 2 Ability to examine patterns of organization from texts .
CLO 3 Ability to identify main idea and evaluate supporting detail.
CLO 4 Ability to identify structure or organization of an argument.
CLO 5 Ability to distinguish between facts and opinions in text.
CLO 6 Ability to identify assumptions, bias, stereotypes , author’s point of veiw, connotative and denotative meanings.
CLO 7 Ability to analyze the common types of fallacies.
CLO 8
Ability to identify the evidence of a text: accuracy, logic and completeness and validity.
CLO 9
Ability to evaluate the text
CLO10
Ability to identify synthesis of ideas .
Lesson Learning Outcome (LLO)
LLO 1 Ability to understand and apply variety reading and learning strategies,’ previewing and predicting’, and ‘skimming’ to increase
the comprehension and retention of information from texts.
LLO 2 Ability to understand and use patterns of organization in reading
LLO 3 Ability to identify main idea and supporting details to improve understanding of texts.
LLO 4 Ability to identify the structure or organization of an argument include issues, conclusions, and reasons in reading.
LLO 5 Ability to differentiate between facts and opinions in texts.
LLO 6 Ability to interpret assumption, bias, stereotypes, author’s point of view, and connotative and denotative meanings in text
LLO 7 Ability to identify common errors in reasoning.
LLO 8 Ability to assess the accuracy of evidence given in supporting an author’s argument..
LLO 9
Ability to synthesize ideas on related issues from intertextual sources in reading text.

Course This course is designed for helping students to sharpen their critical reading skill, to improve their academic literacy, and expand their general
Description knowledge. Students will read a variety of texts in order to improve their analytical, interpretive, and evaluative skill. Students will sythezise
text in all forms in order to develop new ideas and conclusions. They will apply critical and evaluative skill for research, presentation, and
written assignments.
Learning 1. Various reading and learning strategies.
Materials 2. Patterns of organization of text.
3. Main idea and supporting details of text.

2
 4. Structure or organization of an argument.
5. Facts and opinions in text.
6. Assumption, bias, stereotypes, author’s point of view, and connotative and denotative meanings in text.
7. Common errors in reasoning.
8. Accuracy of evidence given in supporting an author’s argument.
9. Synthesizing on related issues from intertextual sources in reading text.

References Main:
1. Seal, Bernard. 2000. Academic Encounters. Reading , Study Skill, and Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Sonka, Amy L. 1981. Skillful Reading. A text and workbook for students of English as a second language. London: Printice-Hall
International, Inc.

Supporting:
Mikulecky, Beatrice S and Linda Jeffries. 1996. More Reading Power. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

Lecturers in 1. Dra. Francisca E Kapoyos, M.Hum.

charge 2. Dr. Kamsinah, M.Hum.
3. Ainun Fatimah, S.S., M.Hum.
4. Drs. Husain Hasyim, M.Hum.
Pre-requisite N/A
subject

3
 Leaning Activities
Scoring
Learning Methods, Learning Materials
Lesson Scoring Percentage

Meeting
Week Students’ Tasks, [References]
Learning (%)
[ Estimated Time]
Outcomes
Indicator Scoring online offline
Criteria &
Scoring Form
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
I 1 Ability to master the Clarity in Criteria: Form: Lecturing Learning contract,
concept of describing Clarity, Method: RPS, CPMK,
academic the ability accuracy, self-directed Permenristekdikti
prerequisites to obtained and communicative learning, small no. 44 Year 2015,
follow within one the activities . group discussion KKNI Document,
semester. done in TM[ (2x(2x50] Unhas Academic
following the Regulation.
subject.

II 2 Ability to *Clarity and Criteria : Form: Lecturing Unit 2 p.34, 5

understand and accuracy in Clarity, Method: Unit 8,p. 132
apply variety using accuracy, and self-directed
reading and strategies classroom learning,
learning strategies,’ previewing and activities. discussion,
previewing and predicting to Task 1 collaborative
predicting’, and increase the previewing and learning.
‘skimming’ to comprehension predicting TM [ (2x(2x50m)]
increase the of the text and Task 2
comprehension and students save skimming
retention of time on
information from reading.
texts. * accuracy in
applying
reading
strategies,
skimming,
4
 students will
save time on
reading
assignme
III 3 Ability to identify Clarity and Criteria: Form: Lecturing Unit 6, p89 5
main idea and accuracy in Classroom Method:
supporting details to saving time on activities self-directing
improve reading learning, small
understanding of group discussion.
texts TM: [(2x(2x50m)]

IV-V 4-5 Ability to Clarity and Criteria: LMS Interactive Unit 7, p.101 5
understand and use accuracy to accuracy, PT + BM lecturing,
patterns of explain the classroom [(1x(2x60m)] Self directed
organization in main idea and activity and Task: learning,
writing (Listing, supporting discussion. The students Cooperative
Sequence, details to upload their learning.
Comparison/Contra improve assignment on TM [2x(2x50m)]
st and students’ writing a
Cause/Effect) ability to biography of
understand the theirselves.
texts

VI- 6-7 Ability to identify Clarity in Criteria: Form: Chapter 4 5

VII an argument include identification Clarity, Interactive lecturing
issues, conclusions, an argument, accuracy, and Self-directed
and reasons in conclusion and classroom learning
writing. reasons in activity Collaborative
writing learning
TM: [2x(2x50m)]

VIII 8 Mid Term Test 15

IX 9 Ability to Clarity and Criteria: Form: Chapter 5 10
differentiate Accuracy to clarity and Interactive
5
 between facts and differentiating accuracy, lecturing, students
opinions on texts between fact classroom presentation in a
and opinion activities small group.
TM [2x(2x50m)]

X 10 Ability to interpret Clarity and Criteria: Chapter 6 10

assumption,bias, Accuracy in Clarity and
stereotypes, interpreting accuracy.
Form:
author’s point of assumption, Classroom
Interactive
view, and bias, activity.
lecturing,
connotative and stereotypes,
Students
author’s point
denotative presentation
of view, and
meanings in text In a small group.
connotat ive
TM [2x(2x50m)]
and denotative
meaning in
text.

XI- 11-12 Ability to analyze Clarity and Criteria: Chapter 7 10

XII the impact of accuracy in Clarity and Form:
fallacies in an anlyzing the accuracy. Interactive lecturing
argument impact of Classroom Students presentatio
fallacies in an activity in a small group.
argument. TM [2x(2x50m)]

XIII 13 Ability to assess the Criteria: Form: Chapter 8 10

accuracy of Clarity and Interactive lecturing
evidence given in acuracy. Students presentatio
support of an Classroom in a small group.
author’s argument activity TM [2x(2x50m)]
XIV- 14-15 Ability to Clarity and Criteria: LMS Chapter 9 10
XV synthesize ideas on accuracy Clarity and PT + BM
related issues from analyzing and accuracy. [(1x(2x60m)]
intertextual sources evaluating Classroom Task:
6
 Evidence. activity The students
Clarity and upload their
accuracy to assignment on
synthezise writing
articles. synthezise article
using evidence

XVI 16 FINAL TEST 15

7
 HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF CULTURAL SCIENCES Document
Code
ENGLISH DEPARTEMENT ....

SEMESTER-BASED COURSE PLAN

Course CODE Course Group Credit SEMESTER Date of writing

T=? P=?
AUTHORISED BY Semester-based course plan Course Group Coordinator (Koordinator Head of Department
Developer (Pengembang RPS) RMK)

Expected Learning Department’s ELOs that must be referred to by the course

Outcome (ELO) Write the ELOs related to the course, which includes attitude (A), Knowledge (K), Generic Skill (G) and Specific Skill (S)
(Capaian ELO 1
Pembelajaran
Lulusan CPL)
ELO 2
...
...
ELO 10
Course Learning Outcome (CLO)
CLO refers to specific topics generated from the ELOs assigned to the course
CLO 1

CLO 2
CLO 3

8
 CLO ...

Lesson Learning Outcome (LLO) (Sub-CPMK)

LLO 1

LLO 2 …..

LLO 3

LLO 4

Course Description Tuliskan disini relevansi & cakupan materi/bahan kajian sesuai dengan matakuliah ini dan sesuai dengan CLO (Sub-CPMK)
Learning Materials Tuliskan di sini bahan kajian dan dijabarkan dalam materi pembelajaran dalam pokok-pokok bahasan yang akan dipelajari oleh mahasiswa sesuai
dengan CLO (Sub-CPMK) tersebut di atas.
References Main:
Tuliskan pustaka utama yang digunakan, termasuk bahan ajar yang disusun oleh dosen pengampu MK ini.

Supporting:
Tuliskan pustaka pendukung jika ada, sebagai pengayaan literasi

Lecturers in charge Tuliskan nama dosen atau tim dosen pengampu mata kuliah
Pre-requisite subject Tuliskan mata kuliah prasyarat, jika ada

9
 Leaning Activities
Learning Methods,
Lesson Scoring Scoring
Students’ Tasks, Learning Materials
Meeting Learning Outcom Percentage
[ Estimated Time] [References]
(%)
Indicator Scoring Criteria & online offline
Scoring Form
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
1
Kontrak kuliah, RPS,
CPMK,
Permenristekdikti
nomor 44 tahun 2015,
Dokumen KKNI,
peraturan akademik
Unhas.
2
…
8 Mid-of-semester test/evaluation
9
…
16 End-of-semester test/evaluation

10