Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators

Weight per Very Unsatisfacto

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Satisfactory
KRA QET Satisfactory ry

5 4 3 2
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 24.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in
Education Knowledge knowledge Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as Objective 1 as
Services and of content shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
Pedagogy within and rating rating rating rating
across sheets/interobs sheets/interobs sheets/interobs sheets/interobs
erver erver erver erver
curriculum
agreement agreement agreement agreement
teaching forms forms forms forms
areas.

Efficiency
Timeliness
2. Ensured Quality Ensured that Ensured that Ensured that Ensured that
the ICT used the ICT used the ICT used ICT are used
the positive redefine and augment and modify but do not
use of ICT transform enrich learning processes and create a new
to facilitate learning experiences improve learning
the teaching experiences and are learning experience
and are documented experiences and/or are
and learning
documented properly and and are documented
process properly and consistently documented but not
consistently using any properly and consistent with
using any referencing consistently one referencing
referencing style as shown using any style as shown
style as shown in the submitted referencing in the submitted
in the submitted learning style as shown learning
learning material in the submitted material
material learning
material

Efficiency
Timeliness
 3. Applied a Quality Applied Applied Applied Applied
teaching teaching teaching teaching
range of strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
teaching challenge require learners require learners lead learners
strategies to learners to to make to describe and along a single
develop draw connections explain ideas path of inquiry
conclusions using ideas learned as and/or to
critical and
and justify their learned as shown in the simple recall
creative thinking or put shown in the submitted and rote
thinking, as parts together submitted learning memorization
well as to promote learning material of concepts as
deeper material shown in the
other
understanding submitted
higher-order of ideas learning
thinking learned as material
skills. shown in the
submitted
learning
material

Efficiency
Timeliness
2. Diversity 4. 24.00% Quality Utilized Utilized Utilized an Utilized a
effective effective effective teaching
of Learners Established teaching teaching teaching strategy or
& a strategies that strategies that strategy that is strategies that
Assessment learnercente are appropriate are appropriate appropriate in partially
and red culture in responding in responding responding to respond to
to learners’ to learners’ learners’ learners’
Reporting by using
linguistic, linguistic, linguistic, linguistic,
teaching cultural, cultural, cultural, cultural,
strategies socioeconomic, socioeconomic, socioeconomic, socioeconomic,
that respond or religious or religious or religious or religious
backgrounds at backgrounds at backgrounds as backgrounds as
to their
an individual a group level* shown in the shown in the
linguistic, level* as shown as shown in the submitted submitted
cultural, in the submitted submitted learning learning
socioecono learning learning material material
material material
mic and
religious
background
s

Efficiency
Timeliness
 5. Planned Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in
and Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as
delivered shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
teaching rating rating rating rating
strategies sheets/interobs sheets/interobs sheets/interobs sheets/interobs
erver erver erver erver
that are
agreement agreement agreement agreement
responsive forms forms forms forms
to the
special
educational
needs of
learners in
difficult
circumstanc Efficiency
es*,
including: Timeliness
6. Used Quality Provided Provided Provided Provided
learners with learners with learners with learners with
strategies
accurate, and accurate, and accurate, and inaccurate
for providing specific and specific general and/or
timely, directed constructive constructive destructive
accurate constructive feedback as feedback as feedback as
feedback* as shown in the shown in the shown in the
and
shown in the evidence evidence evidence
constructive evidence submitted submitted submitted
feedback to submitted
improve
learner
performanc
e Efficiency
Timeliness MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
shows shows shows shows
feedback given feedback given feedback given feedback given
within 5 within 6-10 within 11-20 beyond 20
working days working days working days working days
from from from from
submission** submission** submission** submission**

3. 7. Selected, 16.00% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated

Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in Level 4 in
Curriculum developed,
Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as Objective 7 as
and organized shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
Planning and used rating rating rating rating
appropriate sheets/interobs sheets/interobs sheets/interobs sheets/interobs
erver erver erver erver
teaching
agreement agreement agreement agreement
and learning forms forms forms forms
resources,
including
ICT, to
address
learning
goals
Efficiency
Timeliness
 8. Set Quality All of the Majority of the Half of the Less than half
learning learning learning of the learning
achievable outcomes set outcomes set outcomes set outcomes set
and are aligned with are aligned with are aligned with are aligned with
appropriate the learning the learning the learning the learning
learning competencies competencies competencies competencies
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
outcomes
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
that are
aligned with
learning
competenci
es

Efficiency
Timeliness
4. 9. Built 24.00% Quality Sustained Secured Communicated Communicated
engagement collaboration with and with parents/
Community relationship with parents/ with parents/ obtained guardians
Linkages s with guardians and/ guardians and/ response from and/or wider
and parents/ or wider school or wider school parents/ school
Professional guardians community to community to guardians and/ community to
facilitate facilitate or wider school facilitate
Engagemen and the involvement in involvement in community to involvement in
t & Personal wider school the educative the educative facilitate the educative
Growth and community process as process as involvement in process but
Professional to facilitate evidenced by 2 evidenced by the educative received no
or more of one MOV no. 1 process as response/reply
Developme involvement
MOV no. 1 or 2 or 2 evidenced by as evidenced
nt in the MOV No. 3 by MOV No. 3
educative
process

Efficiency Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any

4 of the 3 of the 2 of the 1 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV

Timeliness
10. Quality Participated in Participated in Participated in Participated in
any any any any
Participated professional professional professional professional
in network/ network/ network/ network/
professional activity that activity that activity that activity that
networks to requires output* requires output* requires output* does not
and proof of and proof of to share require output
share
implementation implementation knowledge and to share
knowledge ** within the ** within the to enhance knowledge and
and to school to share department/gra practice as to enhance
enhance knowledge and de level to evidenced by practice as
to enhance share the submitted evidenced by
practice
practice as knowledge and MOV the submitted
evidenced by to enhance MOV
the submitted practice as
MOV evidenced by
the submitted
MOV

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 of

different kinds different kinds different kinds the acceptable
of acceptable of acceptable of acceptable MOV
MOV*** MOV*** MOV***

Timeliness
11. Quality Updated the Discussed Accomplished Accomplished
Development progress on the the the Strengths
Developed
Plan and Development Development and
a personal approved by Plan with the Plan from Development
improvemen the rater during rater to check learning Needs portion
t plan based Phase II of the whether objectives up to of the
RPMS cycle Development resources Development
on reflection
Needs were needed to Plan after self-
of one’s addressed address assessment at
practice and Development the beginning
ongoing Needs during of the school
Phase I of the year
professional
RPMS cycle
learning

Efficiency Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the Submitted the

IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with IPCRF-DP with
any 4 of the any 3 of the any 2 of the any 1 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
Supporting Supporting Supporting Supporting
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV

Timeliness
 5. Plus 12. 12.00% Quality Performed at Performed at Performed at Performed at
least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related
Factor Performed work/activity work/activity work/activity work/activity
various that contributed that contributed that contributed that contributed
related to the teaching- to the teaching- to the teaching- to the teaching-
works/ learning learning learning learning
process beyond process within process within process within
activities
the school/ the school/ the learning the class as
that Community Community area/ evidenced by
contribute to Learning Learning department as submitted MOV
the Center (CLC) Center (CLC) evidenced by
as evidenced as evidenced submitted MOV
teaching-
by submitted by submitted
learning MOV MOV
process

Efficiency Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any

4 of the 3 of the 2 of the 1 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV

Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

Ratee Rater
Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Actual Rating
Poor Score
Results

1 Q E T Ave
Demonstrated
Level 3 in
Objective 1 as
shown in COT
rating
sheets/interobs
erver
agreement
forms or No
acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
Demonstrated
Level 3 in
Objective 5 as
shown in COT
rating
sheets/interobs
erver
agreement
forms or No
acceptable
evidence was
shown

No evidence
was shown

No evidence
was shown

Demonstrated
Level 3 in
Objective 7 as
shown in COT
rating
sheets/interobs
erver
agreement
forms or No
acceptable
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
 No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

RATING FOR OVERALL

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Approving Authority