Professional Documents
Culture Documents
e-ISSN: 2581-6454
Volume 5 Issue 2
Abstract
This paper has assorted multifarious studies depicting the behaviour of timber bridges to
administer a literature review. It focuses on weaknesses of the timber bridges under seismic
loading as well as methodologies adopted to overcome them. The behaviour of reinforced
joints of timber bridges, the serviceability limits of vibration induced by earthquake loading
and the preference of suitable bearings such that the seismic capacity of timber bridges can
be bolstered is summarized. Additionally, the authors have studied the effect of dynamic
behaviour undergone by the bridges under vehicular loading and its cost efficiency.
Moreover, this paper has also included diverse experimental studies that construe the
behaviour of existing bridges and the seismic behaviour of timber bridges from past
earthquakes. The conclusions of the compiled studied researchers provided the repercussions
of time and climate on the load-bearing capacity of the bridges. By regulating a comparative
study between the behaviour of the seismically loaded former bridges and existing current
bridges, the effects of the earthquakes yet to occur can be marginalized.
Figure 1: (a) Simple cantilever bridge of Bhutan (Source: Getty Images), (b) Traditional
timber bridge of Bhutan (Photography: Kiran Gurung), (c) Plan and structural drawing of
traditional timber bridge of Bhutan (Source: Pro Bhutan).
Figure 2: (a) Wooden Cantilever Supports, (b) Wooden Deck, Railings, and Columns, (c)
Shingle Roof (Photography: Kiran Gurung).
Wood et al. [7] studied the dynamic 3D beam in accordance to the guidelines
response of three glued laminated (glulam) given by the authors. The authors have
timber bridges wherein static and dynamic conducted numerous tests to attain the
field test were performed using a heavily static analysis of the modelled bridges
loaded truck. Bridge deformations such as acoustic emission testing,
(deflections and accelerations) were ultrasonic field-testing and in-situ testing.
analyzed for diverse vehicular speeds at The result obtained from the static analysis
the bridge midspan. The deformations and model analysis included results of
(deflections and accelerations) were selected members of the bridges, such as
reported using high-speed data acquisition
Top-chord, Diagonal, Vertical, Arch
system and DAF computations. The intent
member or Top-cross beam. The authors
of the study was to determine the dynamic
also listed the six lowest natural
behavior of glulam timber bridges so that
reliable design specifications may be frequencies from the 3D model analysis.
established.
Ross et al. [9] used stress wave timing
Spyrakos et al. [8] conducted the seismic nondestructive estimation tools to
study of historic covered bridges in West investigate timber bridges. It ascertained
Virginia by analyzing the structural that the role of the vehicular bridges is
modelling of the bridges. The static very important for the safe and efficient
analysis has been carried out with various working of the transportation. The bridges
loading to represent the 19th century have an average life cycle of 40 years and
loading and the modern loading as per thereafter it needs to be either repaired or
AASHTO. For the seismic analysis the replaced by assessing its condition. The
bridge should be characterized based on inspection of bridges could be done by
seismic performance category SPC=A and hammering, sounding, coring or drilling
SPC=B for A=0.19, SPC=C for A=0.25 as and another nondestructive testing such as
per AASHTO specifications, whereas the James V-Meter (Fig. 4a), Sylva Test (Fig.
bridge of the region has been modelled to 4b), and using stress wave timbers.
(a) (b)
Figure 4: (a) James V-Meter, (b) Sylva Test [9].
two phases, firstly, combined axial load and of timber piers. Fig. 5 illustrated the results of
reversed cyclic flexural tests on piles, the tests conducted with four different timber
secondly; tabular study of shaking behavior pile specimens.
Figure 5: Experimentally observed force-drift relationships for four timber pile specimens
[10].
(a) (b)
Figure 6: (a) Composite members in old timber constructions, (b) Possible concrete-timber
solutions for floors [12].
Figure 7: Weight plotted against span for a service load of 2.5kN/m2. a) All timber section;
b) Concrete-timber composition section; c) All concrete section [12].
Seavey and Larson [13] inspected the that most of the bridges constructed under
timber bridges to assess the lifespan of the auspices of the initiative have
existing 19th century, and critically judge performed well structurally, and only in
whether they should be retrofitted or the case of the Fredericksburg Bridge has
rebuilt. The study stated that such bridges any serious distress, possibly related to the
should undergo a thorough inspection. A treatment process rather than design. They
system POINTIS computer is used for the also discerned that there is no particular
evaluation of the bridges elements, as it relationship among the timber bridges
requires accurate reliable information. For between span length and cost per sq. m.
timber bridges, it requires information
such as its moisture content, preservatives, Brunner [15] studied the design of a
span, legs support, and depth of timber bridge in Switzerland. This design
degradation and so on. work of the bridge has forms of two
continuous, simply supported beams of
Mckeel and Gomez [14] extensively 10.5m span (Fig. 8a). The substructures
researched the modern timber bridges in abutment and the central column were
Virginia addressing the costs, structural constructed with gabions from galvanized
performance, and maintenance steel wires imported from France (Fig. 8b).
requirements of these structures. The study He observed that the gabions is cheap
deduced that the timber bridges were not alternative and is technically advantageous
economically competitive, and their life in being insensitive to erosion hazards.
cycle cost competitiveness cannot be The central column is about 3m high with
resolved in the moment. They concluded its foundation on rock in the middle of the
river. It has been protected by surrounding abutments have been protected with hewn
it with a belt of timber logs filled with rock blocks placed on the sides facing the
rock material. The foundations of the river (Fig. 8c).
Figure 8: (a) Structural System of the pilot bridge, (b) Weaving wires for gabions, (c)
Erosion protection [15].
Parisi and Piazza [16] undertook research timber-concrete composite structure offers
on seismic strength of traditional timber the highest mechanical characteristics.
structures. The authors recognized that Ghosh et al. [17] conducted a study
experimental and numerical analyses of comparing thermal and seismic behavior of a
fully strengthened trusses depicted a bridge constructed with traditional and
discernable seismic response by the modern isolation bearings. The authors
structure in the post elastic range. Timber observed that designing of bearings is
faces permanent deformation when load is essential for the safety of bridges for
applied perpendicular to fibers but yields earthquake displacements and resistance. The
higher mechanical properties when bearings have to be designed considering the
compressed and load is applied parallel to long-term effects due to temperature,
the fibres. Different possible reinforcing shrinkage and creep. It has been discerned
solutions have been incorporated such as that the modern isolation bearings have
insertion of bolts, placing of steel stirrups superior thermal and seismic response than
on the connection sides, and steel binding traditional bearings, wherein latter requires
strip. It also stated that for seismic revolutionary change in the concepts of
upgrading of joints, metal fasteners have bearing design. These bearings have been
to be designed such that they can ensure also designed to ensure that superstructure is
functionality in a situation of reduced isolated from the vibrations transmitted by
compression that may develop under the substructure. Fig. 9 illustrates the various
seismic loading. It concluded that the types of arrangement of bearings were used.
Morris [18] studied several archaic timber framed structures from earthquake.
wooden bridges in North America and The first technique known as “Borbone
from various parts of the world like Å set system” developed in southern Italy and
Bridge, Flisa Bridge, Sletta Bridge in second technique is Greek earthquake
Norway. The paper recommends selection
of material and durability design according resistant solution called “Lefkada
to Canadian Highway Bridge Design traditional building technique”. In the
Code. It further stated that all wood in Borbone system, the timber frame extends
permanent structures shall be preservative all over the floors, stiffness for wall is
treated in accordance with above design mainly provided by filling material
code or American Wood Protection inserted within frames and bracing if any
Association. The author identified that and the roof is supported by a truss system
relying entirely on preservative treatment
which doesn’t transfer any thrust to the
and ignoring design is equally risky.
Priory, across the globe, the longevity of walls and structural joints and is fixed by
many non-covered timber bridges mainly nails. In the Lefkada system, the structures
depended upon bulky application of are multi storied building with masonry
creosote. But due to escalating walls at ground floor and upper floor are
environmental concerns provoked by held by timber frame only and stiffened by
application of creosote, numerous new diagonal members. In this system, the
timber bridges are being dealt by using the
timbers are provided parallel to the wall
management practices tool developed by
the Western Wood Preservers Institute, which supports the first floor slab but
Wood Preservation Canada and Southern doesn’t contribute to the seismic
Forest Products Association. resistance. However, it prevents the
building from total collapse and repairs
Sandra et al. [19] mentioned that there are can be done without interfering with the
two techniques of preservation of the rest of the building.
Figure 10: (a) Cantilever Beam, (b) Diagonal Planks (Source: Ministry of Home and
Cultural Affairs), (c) Reinforcement, (d) Placement of stones at the river bank (Photography:
Deepti Sharma).