You are on page 1of 17

Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Reinforced Concrete Design

Bill Mosley
John Bungey
&
Ray Hulse

Analysis of the structure

Book support material


1
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure

LOADS

• Permanent Actions: Structural weight


cladding
partitions etc

• Variable Actions: occupants


wind
earth pressure etc

Analysis of the structure

LOAD COMBINATIONS at ULS (1)


• Permanent + Variable - max 1.35G k  1.5Qk
- min 1.35Gk

• Permanent + Wind 1.35G k  1.5Wk

• Permanent + Variable + Wind (typical)


1.35Gk  1.5Qk  0.75Wk

Book support material


2
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


LOAD COMBINATIONS at ULS (2)

1.35G k + 1.50Qk 1.35Gk + 1.50Qk


1.50Qk 1.35G k 1.50Qk
1.35Gk
A C

(a) Loading arrangement for maximum sagging


moment at A and C

(b) Deflected shape

Figure 3.1: Three-span beam

Analysis of the structure

LOAD COMBINATIONS at ULS (3)


1.35G k + 1.50Q k 1.35G k + 1.50Q k 1.35Gk + 1.50Q k 1.35G k + 1.50Q k
1.35G k 1.35G k 1.35G k

(i) Loading arrangements for maximum moments in the spans

1.35G k + 1.50Q k 1.35G k + 1.50Q k 1.35Gk + 1.50Q k


1.35G k 1.35G k
A

(ii) Loading arrangements for maximum support moment at A


1.35G k + 1.50Q k
UK National
1.35G k 1.35G k Annex allows
A
alternative of
single load case
(iii) Loading for design moments at the supports according to EC2
with all spans
Note that when there is a cantilever span the minimum loaded with
load on the span adjacent to the cantilever should be 1.0G k
for loading pattern (i) maximum load
Figure 3.2: Multi-span beam loading arrangements
6

Book support material


3
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


Load Combinations: Ex 3.2
Gk = 25 kN/m Qk = 10 kN/m
A B C D

6.0m 4.0m 6.0m

(1.35x25 + 1.50x10)x6
=292.5kN (1.35x25x4) 292.5kN
(1) =135kN

(1.35x25 + 1.50x10)x4
(1.35x25x6)
=202.5kN =195kN 202.5kN
(2)

292.5kN 195kN
(3) 202.5kN

202.5kN 195kN 292.5kN


(4)

Figure 3.5: Continuous beam loading arrangement 7

Analysis of the structure


First Load Case
A B C D
Stiffness ( k ) 3 I I 3 I
. .
4 L L 4 L
3 1 1 = 0.125
. = 0.125 = = 0.25
4 6 4
Distr. Factors 0.125 0.125
0.125  0.25 0.125  0.25
=1/3 =2/3 2/3 1/3

Load (kN) 292 135 292

 292  6 135  4 292  6


F.E.M 0   0
8 12 8
-219.4 +45.0 -45.0 +219.4
Balance +58.1 +116.3 -116.3 -58.1

Carry over -58.1 +58.1


Balance +19.4 +38.7 -38.7 -19.4
Carry over -19.4 +19.4
Balance +6.5 +12.9 -12.9 -6.5
Carry over -6.5 +6.5
Balance +2.2 +4.3 -4.3 -2.2
Carry over -2.2 +2.2
Balance +0.7 +1.5 -1.5 -0.7
 132.5
M (kN m) 0 -132.5 +132.5 -132.5 0
8

Book support material


4
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


Load Combinations: Ex 3.2
133 133

(1) 65

158 158
108 108
11
(2)

103 103
151
100

(3)

109
151
151
100

(3)

109
151

Figure 3.6: Bending Moment Diagrams (kNm) 9

Analysis of the structure


Load Combinations: Ex 3.2
124 168
67.5
(1)
67.5
168 124

83 97.5 119
(2)
119 97.5 83

121 118
110
(3)
85 85
171

85 171
85
(4)

110 121
118
Figure 3.7: Shearing Force Diagrams (kN) 10

10

Book support material


5
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


BM & SF Envelopes
151 151 Design for hogging moment of
65 25% of midspan moment at endspan
(a) 11 kN.m

158 158

124 171
110

(b) kN

110 124
171

Figure 3.8: Bending-moment and shearing-force envelopes


11

11

Analysis of the structure


Continuous beams

Providing that:
• there are three or more approximately equal spans
•spans differ by no more than 15% of longest span
•characteristic live load less than dead load
•loading is uniformly distributed
Moments and loads can be obtained from coefficients

12

12

Book support material


6
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


Continuous beams
End Span Interior Span
0.11FL 0.10FL 0.10FL

(a)
Bending Moments
0.09FL 0.07FL

(b) 0.45F 0.55F


Shearing Forces

0.60F 0.55F

F= Total ultimate load on span = (1.35Gk + 1.50Qk ) kN


L = Effective span

Figure 3.9: Bending-moment and shearing-force coefficients for beams

13

13

Analysis of the structure


ANALYSIS OF FRAMES
H2
(1)
H1

Half stiffness Half stiffness

H2
(2)
H1

Half stiffness Half stiffness

H2
(3)
Figure 3.10: Building Frame H1

H1 , H 2 = Storey Heights
14

14

Book support material


7
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


Substitute Frame: Ex 3.3

J K L M

3.5m
A B C D

4.0m
Beam
600x300
E F G H

6.0m 4.0m 6.0m


350
300
Typical column
section
Figure 3.12: Substitute frame

Same Load Cases as previous example 15

15

Analysis of the structure


First Load Case
A B C D
Cols AB BA Cols BC CB Cols CD DC Cols
M  M  M  M 
D.F.s 0.39 0.61 0.32 0.20 0.48 0.48 0.20 0.32 0.61 0.39
Load kN 292 135 292
+ - + - + -
F.E.M. 146 146 45.0 45.0 146 146
- - + + + - - - + +
Bal. 56.9 89.1 32.3 20.2 48.5 48.5 20.2 32.3 89.1 56.9
+ - - + + -
C.O. 16.2 44.6 24.2 24.2 44.6 16.2
- - + + + - - - + +
Bal. 6.3 9.9 22.0 13.8 33.0 33.0 13.8 22.0 9.9 6.3
+ - - + + -
C.O. 11.0 5.0 16.5 16.5 5.0 11.0
- - + + + - - - + +
Bal. 4.3 6.7 6.9 4.3 10.3 10.3 4.3 6.9 6.7 4.3
+ - - + + -
C.O. 3.4 3.4 5.2 5.2 3.4 3.4
- - + + + - - - + +
Bal. 1.3 2.1 2.8 1.7 4.1 4.1 1.7 2.8 2.1 1.3
M (kNm) - + - + + - - + - +
68.8 68.8 135.0 40.0 95.0 95.0 40.0 135.0 68.8 68.8

16

16

Book support material


8
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


BM & SF Envelopes

17

17

Analysis of the structure


BM & SF Diagrams 135 157
135 135
69 69 67.5
95 95
28 (1)
(1) 67.5

157 135

118 118 91 97.5 111

107 107
88 88 (2)
45 45
(2) 91
111 97.5
10 133
77 77 111
106
147
67 115 80 102 (3)
46
(3) 89 92
1 160
79
114 160
147 92 89
102 80 115 67
46 (4)
(4)
1 111 106
79 133
114

Figure 3.13: Beam bending-moment diagrams (kNm) Figure 3.14: Beam shearing-force diagrams (kN)
18

18

Book support material


9
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


BM & SF Envelopes
147 147
115 115
69 69
28
kNm
10

118 118
135 160
106

kN

106
160 135

Figure 3.15:Bending-moment and shearing-force envelopes


19

19

Analysis of the structure

Column Moments

37 21 21 37
32 19 19 32

Figure 3.16:Column bending-moments (kNm)


20

20

Book support material


10
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


Substitute Frame: Ex 3.4

3.5m
1.35G k + 1.50Qk
1.35G k
=292.5 kN =135 kN
A B C 18

4.0m
16 kNm

6.0m 4.0m

Figure 3.17:Substitute frame Figure 3.18: Column moments


21

21

Analysis of the structure


Lateral Loads: Ex 3.5
5.25kN
3.5

10.5kN 4th
Lateral load = 3.0kN/m

3.5

10.5kN 3rd
3.5

11.25kN 2nd
4.0

12.0kN 1st
4.0

6.0kN

6.0 4.0 6.0

Figure 3.19: Frame with lateral load


See example in text
22

22

Book support material


11
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


Shear Wall Structures: Ex 3.6

0.3m 0.3m

0.2m 0.2m

20m
12m
Resultant horizontal
force Fz 10m 10m 10m

15m 15m

F = 100kN
Figure 3.22: Shear Wall Structure Figure 3.23: Symmetrical Arrangement of Shear Walls

23
23

Analysis of the structure


MOMENT REDISTRIBUTION
w/unit length
Increasing load w
Load

Load causes plastic hinges L


to form at A and C when wL2 Elastic BMD
moment capacity reached 12 B M A = MC = M u
A C
Moments at A and C can wL2
not increase. Additional 24
Additional moments diagram
load induces additional (Hinges at A and C)
moment at B
Moment capacity reached
Collapse mechanism
at B. Plastic hinge forms at
B in addition to A and C. Elastic BMD (Collapse loads)
Beam collapses wL2 Final Collapse BMD
12
Collapse and elastic BM
diagram are same shape.
Elastic BM diagram can be
redistributed to give Figure 3.28: Moment redistribution - one-span beam
collapse diagram
24

24

Book support material


12
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


MOMENT REDISTRIBUTION

•Equilibrium must be maintained


•Beams or slabs must be predominantly subject to flexure
•Ratio of adjacent spans be between 0.5 & 2
•Column design moments must not be reduced
•Other restrictions on amount of redistribution – see Ch4 –
30% maximum

25

25

Analysis of the structure


Moment Redistribution: Ex 3.9
Redistribute (reduce) by up to 30% which will increase mid-
span sagging moments and change reactions and shear forces
147 Reduce by same amount
115 so as not to change
67 80 102 column moments
46

1
79
Max moment 114 But don’t increase sagging moment
from critical beyond maximum from other critical
load case = loading cases
118 kNm
Original Bending Moment Diagram for maximum support moment
26

26

Book support material


13
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure


Moment Redistribution: Ex 3.9
140
67 108 80 102
46

5
79
118
(b) Redistributed Moments (kNm)

134
111
105

90 92
158.5
(c) Shears (kN)

Figure 3.29:Moments and shears after redistribution

27

27

Analysis of the structure


Moment Redistribution: Ex 3.9

With redistribution:
• the moment at a section of a beam can be reduced
without exceeding the design moments at other sections
• the values of the column moments are not affected
• equilibrium is maintained

28

28

Book support material


14
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure (BS8110)

BS8110 - key differences

29

Analysis of the structure (BS8110)

LOAD COMBINATIONS at ULS


• Dead + imposed - max 1.4G  1.6Q
k k
- min 1.0Gk

• Dead + wind 1.0Gk  1.4Wk

• Dead + imposed + wind


1.2Gk  1.2Qk  1.2Wk

25

30

Book support material


15
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure (BS8110)

LOAD COMBINATIONS at ULS


1.4G k + 1.6Q k 1.4G k + 1.6Q k 1.4G k + 1.6Q k 1.4G k + 1.6Q k
1.0G k 1.0G k 1.0G k

(i) Loading arrangements for maximum moments in the spans

1.4G k + 1.6Q k 1.4G k + 1.6Q k 1.4G k + 1.6Q k


1.0G k 1.0G k 1.0G k
A

(ii) Loading arrangements for maximum support moment at A

1.4G k + 1.6Q k

(iii) Loading for design moments at the supports according to BS8110


Note that when there is a cantilever span the minimum
load on the span adjacent to the cantilever should be 1.0G k
for loading pattern (i)

Figure 3.2: Multi-span beam loading arrangements


26

31

Analysis of the structure (BS8110)


Continuous beams

End Span Interior Span


0.11FL 0.08FL 0.08FL

(a)
Bending Moments
0.09FL 0.07FL

(b) 0.45F 0.55F


Shearing Forces

0.6F 0.55F

F= Total ultimate load on span = (1.4Gk + 1.6Qk ) kN


L = Effective span

Figure 3.10: Bending-moment and shearing-force coefficients for beams


32

32

Book support material


16
Reinforced Concrete Design to EC2 Mosley, Bungey & Hulse

Analysis of the structure (BS8110)

End of chapter 3

33

Book support material


17

You might also like