Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared by:
Agliba, Via B.
Benemerito, Katrin Joy V.
Ocampo, Rachelle S.
Tagarro, Royanie Krissy J.
CE- 4A
Submitted to:
Engr. Ronald Danan
Course Instructor
Republic of the Philippines
Nueva Ecija University of Science and
Technology College of Engineering
Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATION
Construction estimating is the process of anticipating the expense of building a physical
structure. This step is essential, and one of the most crucial in the construction process.
Estimators need to be as accurate as possible because profit margins (the livelihood of
contractors) are impacted if any estimated direct and indirect costs for the project are
off by even the slight amount.
Project owners use cost estimates to determine a project's scope and feasibility and to
allocate budgets.
ESTIMATING FORMATS
Two most commonly used formats:
Master Format
often referred to as CSI Master Format, currently provides WBS into 16 trade/materials
based divisional categories (in the process of being expanded to 49 divisions)
Uniformat
represents WBS costs according to a hierarchy of system elements, and is supported
through various organizations, e.g. the U.S. General Services Administration and CSI.
Although different in their system headings, each provides a hierarchical WBS by
systems.
ESTIMATING METHODS
• Preliminary Estimates
Early in the planning stages, both building owners and designers must agree on an
anticipated cost of the project at bid award. Preliminary Estimates are employed in the early
planning phases of a proposed project to match an owner's needs, expressed as written
programmatic requirements, with budget constraints in order to establish its overall scope
(size) and quality expectations. The WBS recommended at this stage is a systems-based
format, where elements of the building (e.g. exterior closure) are the method of
categorization. Estimate comparisons at this stage are especially valuable in evaluating the
feasibility of strategic alternatives being considered to satisfy current and projected space
requirements (e.g. new construction versus renovation, or lease space). As the design is not
fully developed at this stage, a design contingency is typically included, typically between
10–15%. Issues which need to be identified at this juncture include method of procurement
being considered, location market factors, specific site constraints or challenges, proposed
phasing plans, and start and finish dates. It is recommended that a formal risk analysis be
carried out at every stage in the design, but particularly in the planning stage when
proactive steps can be taken to mitigate identified risks.
• Intermediate Estimates.
After proceeding with a preferred course of action, Intermediate Estimates are
employed at various stages of project design development to maintain accountability for
initial budget projections and as a means of evaluating competing alternative construction
assemblies, systems, and materials. On large projects it is common practice for an owner to
employ a construction manager or professional estimator to continually update project
estimates and provide feedback on budget impacts of decisions on major design elements.
The estimates will typically still be in a Uniformat systems WBS , however a
summary/conversion may also be provided in CSI MasterFormat. The risk assessment
should be updated and a contingency factor calculated depending on the outcome of the
Republic of the Philippines
Nueva Ecija University of Science and
Technology College of Engineering
Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija
risk analysis. As the design progresses and risks are mitigated, the design contingency can
typically be reduced.
Many owners employ Earned Value Analysis cost management practices as the design
progresses, to determine if the project is on track according to both schedule and budget.
This can be as straightforward as tracking costs across building systems (e.g. the mechanical
system) or can be more mathematically based to forecast the final outcome of the project.
• Final Estimates.
As the design is completed a detailed pre-bid estimate can be prepared. At this stage the
design contingency would typically be reduced to zero: however, in some instances, there
will still be risk surrounding the project, which would make it prudent to still include a small
bidding contingency. The estimate should be organized in the same WBS as required of the
bidders, which typically is CSI MasterFormat. This then allows for a comparison of the final
estimate with the bids received and can aid in negotiating with the lowest bidder. In
addition, having the final estimate and bids in the same format facilitates developing cost
databases for use in planning future projects. This typically means taking a CSI bid and re-
sorting the data into a Uniformat WBS.
Using standard estimating formats for cost estimating and cost management:
b) Uniformat Estimates
Uniformat estimating applies unit-cost data to building-system and component site
elements. This “systems” approach uses a hierarchical structure of cost elements, beginning
at Level 1 with basic systems, such as Substructure, Exterior Enclosure, and Interior
Construction, 7 general requirements and principles section 1.3 and proceeding to
successively more detailed subdivisions of these systems at Levels 2-5. The resulting levels
of detail not only serve to structure cost information but also facilitate estimates to
whatever level of detail the design team can provide as the project is developed through
the design submission phases. For example, by the final concept design phase, the design
team and estimator may have Level 4 information on Substructure, but only Level 2 detail
for Interior Construction. Although the construction industry uses several variations on the
Uniformat concept, GSA requires that cost estimators use its particular version, for
consistency in use and maintenance of GSA’s cost databases.
CSI MASTERFORMAT
CSI MasterFormat is the standard used to provide synchronicity between
manufacturers and builders. The MasterFormat is used by manufacturers to ensure that
their products meet requirements such as size, weight, or material types.
Over the years, people within the building and construction manufacturing
industries have dubbed MasterFormat as “the Dewey Decimal System” of building and
construction.
The CSI MasterFormat is a series of coding systems, broken down and
categorized by sections referred to as Divisions.
More specifically, 50 Divisions in all to date. Up until 2004, there were only 16
Divisions (more about the divisions below).
HISTORY OF CSI
Republic of the Philippines
Nueva Ecija University of Science and
Technology College of Engineering
Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija
MASTERFORMAT
In the mid-20th century, sometime after World War II, different material types
and new products began hitting markets. Construction specifications began to develop,
attempting to usher standards into the growing list of building materials.
In 1963, CSI published a format for construction companies and manufacturers
to use, which enabled them to place orders or fabricate along with this numeric system
of standards. At the time, this format consisted of 16 total divisions. It wasn’t being
called the MasterFormat till around 1975.
Due to the rapid expansion of technology, building materials, and furnishings
installed into various buildings, CSI expanded their 16 Division formats to a 50 Division
format back in November of 2004. Some of these divisions work as placeholders- blank
in wait for the expansion.
-The MasterFormat also helps contractors and architects work on additions in the future
and renovations. The data can be easily retrieved. And with the increased use of
building information modeling (BIM), the MasterFormat is a good fit. More and more,
modeling software systems are using MasterFormat’s format for BIM integration.
Republic of the Philippines
Nueva Ecija University of Science and
Technology College of Engineering
Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija
MASTERFORMAT REVISIONS
In 1963, the data organised into the CSI Format for Construction Specifications (the
precursor to MasterFormat) included 16 primary areas. The standard divided the data into
groups. These groups were then categorised into subgroups which were then broken down into
divisions.
Over the years, the standard has expanded, most significantly in 2004. Subsequent revisions of
the MasterFormat have been released in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020.
The 2018 version of MasterFormat includes information regarding maintenance and repair
operations, recycling and other lifecycle activities based on the same format and numbering
structure as those used for construction specifications.
As of July 2020, this is the current structure of MasterFormat (based on the 2018 revision; the
most recent revision was published in late 2020).
several Divisions are not yet populated with any information. They have been reserved for
further expansion as different categories may arise. This is CSI’s solution for preparing for the
next wave of technological and material leaps.
SPECIFICATIONS GROUP
Division 05 — Metals
Division 06 — Wood, Plastics and Composites
Division 07 — Thermal and Moisture Protection
Division 08 — Openings
Division 09 — Finishes
Division 10 — Specialities
Division 11 — Equipment
Division 12 — Furnishings
Division 13 — Special Construction
Division 14 — Conveying Equipment
Division 15 – Reserved for Future Expansion
Division 16 – Reserved for Future Expansion
Division 17 – Reserved for Future Expansion
Division 18 – Reserved for Future Expansion
Division 19 – Reserved for Future Expansion