Odeña, Thamiah Izabell B.

BSE-English 1A

THE TWO FACES OF THE 1872 CAVITE MUTINY

By Chris Antonette Piedad-Pugay
      The 12th of June of every year since 1898 is a very important event for all the Filipinos.  In
this particular day, the entire Filipino nation as well as Filipino communities all over the world
gathers to celebrate the Philippines’ Independence Day.  1898 came to be a very significant year
for all of us— it is as equally important as 1896—the year when the Philippine Revolution broke
out owing to the Filipinos’ desire to be free from the abuses of the Spanish colonial regime.  But
we should be reminded that another year is as historic as the two—1872.
       Two major events happened in 1872, first was the 1872 Cavite Mutiny and the other was the
martyrdom of the three martyr priests in the persons of Fathers Mariano Gomes, Jose Burgos and
Jacinto Zamora (GOMBURZA).  However, not all of us knew that there were different accounts
in reference to the said event.  All Filipinos must know the different sides of the story—since this
event led to another tragic yet meaningful part of our history—the execution of GOMBURZA
which in effect a major factor in the awakening of nationalism among the Filipinos.

1872 Cavite Mutiny: Spanish Perspective

       Jose Montero y Vidal, a prolific Spanish historian documented the event and highlighted it
as an attempt of the Indios to overthrow the Spanish government in the Philippines. Meanwhile,
Gov. Gen. Rafael Izquierdo’s official report magnified the event and made use of it to implicate
the native clergy, which was then active in the call for secularization.  The two accounts
complimented and corroborated with one other, only that the general’s report was more spiteful.
Initially, both Montero and Izquierdo scored out that the abolition of privileges enjoyed by the
workers of Cavite arsenal such as non-payment of tributes and exemption from force labor were
the main reasons of the “revolution” as how they called it, however, other causes were
enumerated by them including the Spanish Revolution which overthrew the secular throne, dirty
propagandas proliferated by unrestrained press, democratic, liberal and republican books and
pamphlets reaching the Philippines, and most importantly, the presence of the native clergy who
out of animosity against the Spanish friars, “conspired and supported” the rebels and enemies of
Spain.  In particular, Izquierdo blamed the unruly Spanish Press for “stockpiling” malicious
propagandas grasped by the Filipinos.  He reported to the King of Spain that the “rebels” wanted
to overthrow the Spanish government to install a new “hari” in the likes of Fathers Burgos and
Zamora.  The general even added that the native clergy enticed other participants by giving them
charismatic assurance that their fight will not fail because God is with them coupled with
handsome promises of rewards such as employment, wealth, and ranks in the army.  Izquierdo,
in his report lambasted the Indios as gullible and possessed an innate propensity for stealing.
       The two Spaniards deemed that the event of 1872 was planned earlier and was thought of it
as a big conspiracy among educated leaders, mestizos, abogadillos or native lawyers, residents of
Manila and Cavite and the native clergy.  They insinuated that the conspirators of Manila and
Cavite planned to liquidate high-ranking Spanish officers to be followed by the massacre of the
friars.  The alleged pre-concerted signal among the conspirators of Manila and Cavite was the
firing of rockets from the walls of Intramuros.
     According to the accounts of the two, on 20 January 1872, the district of Sampaloc celebrated
the feast of the Virgin of Loreto, unfortunately participants to the feast celebrated the occasion
with the usual fireworks displays.  Allegedly, those in Cavite mistook the fireworks as the sign
for the attack, and just like what was agreed upon, the 200-men contingent headed by Sergeant
Lamadrid launched an attack targeting Spanish officers at sight and seized the arsenal.
       When the news reached the iron-fisted Gov. Izquierdo, he readily ordered the reinforcement
of the Spanish forces in Cavite to quell the revolt.  The “revolution” was easily crushed when the
expected reinforcement from Manila did not come ashore.  Major instigators including Sergeant
Lamadrid were killed in the skirmish, while the GOMBURZA were tried by a court-martial and
were sentenced to die by strangulation.  Patriots like Joaquin Pardo de Tavera, Antonio Ma.
Regidor, Jose and Pio Basa and other abogadillos were suspended by the Audencia (High Court)
from the practice of law, arrested and were sentenced with life imprisonment at the Marianas
Island.  Furthermore, Gov. Izquierdo dissolved the native regiments of artillery and ordered the
creation of artillery force to be composed exclusively of the Peninsulares.
        On 17 February 1872 in an attempt of the Spanish government and Frailocracia to instill
fear among the Filipinos so that they may never commit such daring act again, the GOMBURZA
were executed.  This event was tragic but served as one of the moving forces that shaped Filipino
nationalism.

A Response to Injustice: The Filipino Version of the Incident

        Dr. Trinidad Hermenigildo Pardo de Tavera, a Filipino scholar and researcher, wrote the
Filipino version of the bloody incident in Cavite.  In his point of view, the incident was a mere
mutiny by the native Filipino soldiers and laborers of the Cavite arsenal who turned out to be
dissatisfied with the abolition of their privileges.  Indirectly, Tavera blamed Gov. Izquierdo’s
cold-blooded policies such as the abolition of privileges of the workers and native army members
of the arsenal and the prohibition of the founding of school of arts and trades for the Filipinos,
which the general believed as a cover-up for the organization of a political club.
       On 20 January 1872, about 200 men comprised of soldiers, laborers of the arsenal, and
residents of Cavite headed by Sergeant Lamadrid rose in arms and assassinated the commanding
officer and Spanish officers in sight.  The insurgents were expecting support from the bulk of the
army unfortunately, that didn’t happen.  The news about the mutiny reached authorities in
Manila and Gen. Izquierdo immediately ordered the reinforcement of Spanish troops in Cavite. 
After two days, the mutiny was officially declared subdued.
      Tavera believed that the Spanish friars and Izquierdo used the Cavite Mutiny as a powerful
lever by magnifying it as a full-blown conspiracy involving not only the native army but also
included residents of Cavite and Manila, and more importantly the native clergy to overthrow the
Spanish government in the Philippines.  It is noteworthy that during the time, the Central
Government in Madrid announced its intention to deprive the friars of all the powers of
intervention in matters of civil government and the direction and management of educational
institutions.  This turnout of events was believed by Tavera, prompted the friars to do something
drastic in their dire sedire to maintain power in the Philippines.
       Meanwhile, in the intention of installing reforms, the Central Government of Spain
welcomed an educational decree authored by Segismundo Moret promoted the fusion of
sectarian schools run by the friars into a school called Philippine Institute.  The decree proposed
to improve the standard of education in the Philippines by requiring teaching positions in such
schools to be filled by competitive examinations. This improvement was warmly received by
most Filipinos in spite of the native clergy’s zest for secularization.
       The friars, fearing that their influence in the Philippines would be a thing of the past, took
advantage of the incident and presented it to the Spanish Government as a vast conspiracy
organized throughout the archipelago with the object of destroying Spanish sovereignty. Tavera
sadly confirmed that the Madrid government came to believe that the scheme was true without
any attempt to investigate the real facts or extent of the alleged “revolution” reported by
Izquierdo and the friars.
       Convicted educated men who participated in the mutiny were sentenced life imprisonment
while members of the native clergy headed by the GOMBURZA were tried and executed by
garrote.  This episode leads to the awakening of nationalism and eventually to the outbreak of
Philippine Revolution of 1896.  The French writer Edmund Plauchut’s account complimented
Tavera’s account by confirming that the event happened due to discontentment of the arsenal
workers and soldiers in Cavite fort.  The Frenchman, however, dwelt more on the execution of
the three martyr priests which he actually witnessed.

Unraveling the Truth

       Considering the four accounts of the 1872 Mutiny, there were some basic facts that remained
to be unvarying: First, there was dissatisfaction among the workers of the arsenal as well as the
members of the native army after their privileges were drawn back by Gen. Izquierdo; Second,
Gen. Izquierdo introduced rigid and strict policies that made the Filipinos move and turn away
from Spanish government out of disgust; Third, the Central Government failed to conduct an
investigation on what truly transpired but relied on reports of Izquierdo and the friars and the
opinion of the public; Fourth, the happy days of the friars were already numbered in 1872 when
the Central Government in Spain decided to deprive them of the power to intervene in
government affairs as well as in the direction and management of schools prompting them to
commit frantic moves to extend their stay and power; Fifth,  the Filipino clergy members
actively participated in the secularization movement in order to  allow Filipino priests to take
hold of the parishes in the country making them prey to the rage of the friars; Sixth, Filipinos
during the time were active participants, and responded to what they deemed as injustices; and
Lastly, the execution of GOMBURZA was a blunder on the part of the Spanish government, for
the action severed the ill-feelings of the Filipinos and the event inspired Filipino patriots to call
for reforms and eventually independence.  There may be different versions of the event, but one
thing is certain, the 1872 Cavite Mutiny paved way for a momentous 1898.
        The road to independence was rough and tough to toddle, many patriots named and
unnamed shed their bloods to attain reforms and achieve independence.  12 June 1898 may be a
glorious event for us, but we should not forget that before we came across to victory, our
forefathers suffered enough.  As weenjoy our freeedom, may we be more historically aware of
our past to have a better future ahead of us.  And just like what Elias said in Noli me Tangere,
may we “not forget those who fell during the night.”

Odeña, Thamiah Izabell B.

BSE-English 1A

1. How much is the budget that the DepEd needs to replace quake-cracked classrooms
in Mindanao?
2. Who will lead relief efforts in earthquake-stricken parts of Mindanao?
3. In what mountain did Phivolcs installed seismic instruments?
4. What does ASEAN mean?
 5. Where did the 35th ASEAN summit held?
6. Who is the Presidential Peace Adviser?
7. What Asian country donated to quake-hit Mindanao?
8. How much did this country donated?
9. Estimated worth of the damages that is caused by a powerful earthquake in
Mindanao.
10. PNPA cadet that was rushed to the hospital that is suspected of hazing.
11. Worth of projects ‘parked’ in 2020 budget?
12. Food Corporation that has a product that is positive of African Swine Fever.
13 – 14. The 2 products of this corporation that is positive of ASF.
15. President Rodrigo Duterte urged the public not to vote for ______________ if she
decides to run for president.
16. The house of President Rodrigo Duterte will be tested by structural engineers of?
17. Who is the Transportation Secretary?
18. A landslide struck this Mountain following a 6.5-magnitude quake that rocked
southern Mindanao.
19. Title of the operational plan of PDEA to public transport vehicle personnel for a
random drug test.
20. Former mayor of Bukidnon who is sentenced by Sandiganbayan for up to eight years
in prison.
21. What does PCOO means?
22. QCPD deploys how many cops for undas?
23. Who did President Rodrigo Duterte designate as OIC during ASEAN meet?
24. President Rodrigo Duterte said that it is the best weapon for quake.
25. DOH supports the total ban of ____________ in the country.
26. Who is the Department of Agriculture secretary?
27. What does BI means?

ANSWER KEY

1. 1.6 billion
2. Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana
3. Mt. Apo
4. Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN)
5. Thailand
6. Carlito Galvez Jr.
7. China
8. P22 million
9. P1 billion
10. Cadet 4th Class John Desiderio
11. P20 billion
12. Mekeni Food Corporation
13. Skinless Longganisa
14. Hotdog
15. Leni Robredo
16. DPWH
17. Arthur Tugade
18. Mt. Apo
19. Undaspot
20. Manolo Fortich
21. Presidential Communications Operation Office
22. 2.4k
23. Salvador Medialdea
24. Prayer
25. Electronic Cigarettes
26. William Dar
27. Bureau of Immigration